Dec. 5, 2011 (#975)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 5, 2011:
Media Drumming about What's Coming:
"Incredible Forces Across Us are Sweeping,
Gov. Churns Out Laws from Every Meeting,
All with Portent of Force and Brutality,
Turned on Peoples by Bestial Mentality,
Yet Like Sheep at Grazing, Regardless of News,
We Feel Unperturbed Between the Chews,
Police Have Been Armed to Fight a War,
That's What Planes, Tanks and Machine Guns For,
Not for the Occasional Terrorists, But for Collapse
Of Failing States, or Just Perhaps
For the Coming Riots the Think-Tanks Project,
Gone Will Be Motto of Serve and Protect,
Overwhelming Force Abroad and at Home,
And Terrorist Inquisition to Chill to the Bone"
© Alan Watt Dec. 5, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 5, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December the 5th 2011. For newcomers, you should help yourself to the web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Youíll find hundreds of audios for free download and hopefully youíll begin to understand this incredibly massive system, very intricately woven together through different agencies, organizations, private banks, international money lenders, foundations, non-governmental organizations that really run the world, and all the think tanks that really plan the future that work with them, and all these organizations beneath them which help shape the way by lobbying governments and getting lots of information out to the media, thatís all on board with it too. So youíre living in a planned society, a planned future, and itís been that way for an awful, awful long time in fact, an awful long time. I go through the histories of some of the organizations that came up with the initial idea, that at least surfaced during the 19th and 20th centuries and Iím sure they were on the go long before that, but at least they surfaced with certain names for their organizations during those years. Sometimes they changed their names too and they worked in secrecy, even though the same organizations were putting Presidents and Prime Ministers in since the late 1800s. Most people didnít even know that they existed or the name of the organization; even Winston Churchill didnít know during World War II. Eventually they called themselves the Royal Institute of International Affairs for Britain and the Council on Foreign Relations for the US; they have branches in every country. And they literally have been writing all your media, writing your childrenís history books, for generations, and they plan the future for you too. They run all the media too.
So help yourself to those and youíll find a whole bunch of sites listed on cuttingthroughthematrix.com; these are all the sites I have. Thereís nothing else I have thatís outside that page so if you see something with my name on it, it isnít mine. Youíll find that if you get sticking on download try one of these alternate sites Iíve got listed because so many folk go into the .com at the same time generally every night. They all carry the audios. They all carry transcripts in English for print up, if you want print up versions, and if you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu youíll find a variety to choose from there as well. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. Iím basically on my own here. Iím not backed by organizations or advertising companies. I donít have shares or own companies in fact, which is okay for those who do, as hosts, but I donít do it that way. I rely on you the audience to keep me going by buying the books and disks Iíve got at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] And straight donations are really, really welcome as I say, because this is not an empire or a business here. I think you lose a lot when you start into a full-time business type patriot side of things because you become a business, you become part of that which youíre supposedly opposing, or at least exposing. And you canít help it when youíre dependent upon big money coming in every day. And thatís just what happens.
Itís just like music too; you know musicís the very same thing. Everything starts off as an anti-something, anti-establishment, and of course it becomes mainstream and it loses everything on the way. It becomes mainstream. Even the ads on television start using them, and you know thatís when itís lost its punch. But thatís the way things go and weíre fighting, really, for our lives across the world, against this massive monolithic structure really thatís taking over, which is called globalism, new world order Ė thereís a whole bunch of terms all for the same thing. Bush the 1st mentioned it. He said it was coming into view, in his lifetime, and he talked about the thousand points of light, the BIG organizations that are fronting for it, the banks, everything, and the NGOs. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix. Thereís so much happening across the world, because weíre being guided, the whole worldís on board, every nationís on board with this one big agenda, the same thing that happened after 9/11 where every country immediately came out with this massive anti-terrorism bill, which was identical to their neighbors, the ones to the north, south, east and west. And across the world at the same time, which tells you they were all ready to get up and running, on board together with the same agenda. And of course, 9/11 was the start for the new world order. Many people actually said that. They said the 21st century was the Century of Change and thatís why it became Obamaís slogan in fact, from his marketers of course, change is good, change is good. And of course nobody thought to ask, define this change, you know, and weíll see if itís good or not. It didnít matter because marketing and slogans always win.... Lenin talked about that.
So anyway, the 21st century was the Century of Change. Now, everything is in doublespeak from the top, as we know, Orwellian doublespeak where theyíll tell you something. Theyíll always use the poor across the world as an excuse for doing something, generally to rip off everyone else, including the poor across the seas, because we are natural human beings, we have empathy, we want to help people, that kind of stuff. But the psychopaths at the top, being psychopaths, know what language to use that will work on you. So, itís either to keep you safe, theyíll take away all your rights for instance and do all the nasty things which they do, but also with the poor too, weíll redistribute the wealth. Now hereís top bankers in the world following a Marxist doctrine, and no one questions it. Since when did bankers go into the altruistic business? It doesnít happen, with bankers, where the only thing that counts is profit, massive profit, maximize the profit. But theyíre all on board of course with this redistribution of wealth across the world, under the guise of carbon trading and that kind of stuff. And in reality itís to go into those countries and end up owning all the resources of those countries. Thatís what foreign aid is about as well. Itís always been that way.
So weíve gone through massive changes towards this new world order. Weíre IN it. Weíre well established into it. People have adapted into it. And even the hype to do with the TSA, doing all their nasty stuff at the airports is becoming kind of passť now. Weíre used to it. Thereís articles in the paper all the time about old folk being stripped and searched and all the rest of it. And no one really raises much of an eyebrow now, because we adapt as a species. And thatís what they count on at the top, weíre always adapting to new rules, regulations. And all regulations and rules are meant to alter your behavior. You are under behavior modification all the time. All the time.
Now, back in 2005 I mentioned before, when for the first time the Council on Foreign Relations came out, on its own, on national television as the Council on Foreign Relations, not just someone from it advising some President or Prime Minister as weíd often seen before, but as their own organization. They admitted they drafted up the amalgamation for the North American Union. And it is to be a total amalgamation. Then of course once the word got out they quietened it down a bit. They kept having their meetings and integrating with their signing of more treaties until 2010, and 2011; theyíre still going on with new treaties. And hereís one of them too; Iíve mentioned it before. This is actually part of the integration for those who canít figure it out. Iíve mentioned this border deal with the US that will allow police to come into Canada from the US. And it says...
Border deal fuels concerns in Canada
thestar.com / November 29, 2011 / Les Whittington
OTTAWAóArmed U.S. police officers will for the first time be allowed to operate in Canada along with the RCMP as part of far-reaching changes in Canadian-American border operations to be unveiled next week by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama. (Alan: Now, theyíll be doing the same with Mexico and elsewhere too, in other countries by the way. Everything I read here is for other countries too. Theyíre very quiet about it but thatís what theyíre doing.)
The joint action plan to be announced at the White House (A: Thatís great, Canadians will find out, from the White House.) will also break new ground by introducing exit-entry records that will track the movements of everyone who leaves the United States or Canada, with the information available to authorities in both countries. (A: So weíre sharing all criminal databases.)
In the months and years ahead, the deal between Ottawa and Washington will reshape security, travel and commercial arrangements at the border in a variety of profound ways ó some of which have already raised alarms among Canadians. (A: I havenít seen any. In fact it would take an awful lot to happen to raise alarm in most Canadians to be honest with you.)
The agreement, which has been the subject of confidential (A: And they have actually been secret negotiations...) negotiations since last winter, is intended to reverse the economically damaging border tie-ups that have been growing since Sept. 11, 2001, while upgrading anti-crime and anti-terrorist security for both countries.
In contrast to the silence from Canadian negotiators (A: That tells you all you need to know about Canadian negotiators, theyíre totally silent.), some U.S. officials have been open about what the new reality at the border will look like in the years ahead.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder revealed last fall that the deal will authorize Canada and the U.S. to designate officers who can take part in police investigations on both sides of the border. The pilot project, Holder said, will improve the two countriesí ability to deal with the ďunprecedentedĒ threats along the border from terrorists, human smugglers, illegal firearms traffickers and drug dealers.
The model for the joint policing program is the Shiprider project, a three-year-old plan under which the RCMP and U.S. Coast Guard join forces and ride in each othersí vessels when patrolling boundary waters. (A: So I guess the Canadians get a chance to jump into the high-tech ones the US has got; theyíll all want that little, you know, ride in the boat there.)
As part of the measures to improve security and streamline border practices, the Beyond the Border blueprint (A: Theyíve had so many names for this, clear pass and a whole bunch of names. Now itís called Beyond the Border blueprint...) is also expected to include greatly increased information-sharing between Canada and the U.S., including the exit-entry plan.
This secretly devised shake-up of border operations has sparked widespread concerns. (A: Well, how can it when itís just been announced and itís secret? [Alan laughing.] You know.)
ďItís contemptuous of Canadian citizenry to unveil a program in which weíve had essentially no input,Ē (A: Well thatís fairly typical for Canada.) said Micheal Vonn, policy director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association.
ďThis process has really been conducted behind closed doors. Weíve had no white papers, no reports ó nothing that we could point to to say, ĎHere are the pros and cons, here are the drawbacks, here are the things we are considering,í Ē she said.
So itís quite amazing to see it. The whole integration deal is here. Because back in 2005, between then and 2010 they had another big article out about Fortress America where thereíll be total integration of ALL forces across America, including sharing not only of all databases to do with business, whatever, but also to do with every single citizen. So basically weíre all in each otherís computers, and thatís called integration for those who donít know what that means. It also talked about sharing customs, cash basically, all import duties and stuff like that. Thatís integration folks. Thatís total integration. So again, thereís no outcry because most folk donít even know itís happening. They donít know. Itís kept secret. And you get these little bits in the paper and thatís all you get, youíre told.
And itís interesting too, that the US is going on about the drugs coming in from Canada into the States, etc, and at the same time thereís been so many exposťs about them actually sharing the cash often and laundering money. Hereís an article here...
US agents laundered drug money: report
news.yahoo.com / AFP Ė Sun, Dec 4,
Anti-narcotics agents working for the US government have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds to see how the system works (A: [Alan laughing.] Do you want to believe that folks?) and use the information against Mexican drug cartels, (A: Itís kind of like when they smuggled all the guns to them too, and says letís see if they shoot each other, you know.) The New York Times reported Sunday.
Citing unnamed current and former federal law enforcement officials, the newspaper said the agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders.
Some 45,000 people have been killed in Mexico since 2006, when its government launched a major military crackdown against the powerful drug cartels that have terrorized border communities as they battled over lucrative smuggling routes.
According to these officials, the operations were aimed at identifying how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are (A: Like they didnít know already, eh, they didnít know that already?), the report said.
The agents had deposited the proceeds in accounts designated by traffickers, or in shell accounts set up by agents, the paper noted. (A: So, can you tell the difference between whoís legit and who isnít legit? Legit just means you got a badge... youíre setting up shell accounts and all the rest of it to launder cash.)
What a world we live in, eh? What an incredible world we live in. And really, we hardly live at all actually because what does living mean? Living should be the ability to live with your own mind, and be free of all these impositions by preexisting, preexisting before you were born, authorities, that spread like cancers. Once they establish themselves on paper they just blossom and blossom and blossom. So youíre not really free. Youíre constantly bombarded with messages to accept the system, even when the definition of the country keeps changing. People donít notice it. They still go out and cry when the national anthems come on in different countries and they donít realize that you donít stand for any of the things which you stood for 20 years ago, or 30 years ago. None of them. Youíre 180 degrees off but they donít notice. But the freedom to have privacy in your own mind is of paramount importance and the privacy not to be under an extortion racket, run by government, is also a right everyone has as well Ė I donít care what name they want to give it, thereís a thousand names they could choose from but extortion rackets are extortion rackets.
Remember, the US too, part of the whole battle for independence was the right for, really, legal and taxational representation. Where have you ever seen the government ask the publicís input on anything to do with taxation? All you get handed is, hereís a new tax, hereís another tax, and hereís the other tax... and weíre jacking these taxes up. We pay taxes on fuel when we mail things from Canada. The Post Office has got a fuel charge. Itís gone up 5 times since last year. No one was told about that or asked their opinion. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Now, Britain has been sunk by mass immigration for years. Iíve read the article on air from Tony Blair when he was in, the Assistant Prime Minister who said that Tony Blair had said to him, to massively increase the immigration in order to destroy what was left of the British culture.† He said it must be so destroyed they could never reform, they would have no memory basically of what it was before all this happened. In other words, you canít create something new until you obliterate the old; thatís the old strategy which has been used, with these globalists. Itís interesting too, Iíve even put links up in the past where you hear Tony Blair and all these multi-millionaires, probably a billionaire now because JP Morgan is backing him. Youíll see them all singing The Red Flag, keep the red flag flying high, all these guys on stage; they belong to the Socialist Internationale, which is just another form of communism, one of the fronts of it actually. Anyway this article here is...
Wanted: more immigrants to boost British economy - independent.co.uk / Ben Chu / 3 December 2011
So thereís a big hoopla about that, more of them are coming in. And they already are a welfare state. And actually it helps, it helps the anti-terrorism, it helps the police recruit more and more because thereís always crime when the poor ones come in and they canít get work. I mean, thatís just obvious isnít it? And somebody, one of the top guys got fired a few years ago for saying that. He says, yeah, when poverty and prices go up and poverty really hits the public thereís going to be more crime, it always goes hand-in-hand. He got fired for telling the truth. Thatís just what happens, anywhere. So Iíll put this link up too.
And an interesting link to vaccines, they give you 2 centuries of official statistics, which contradict all the hoopla that the big pharma gives us today on the actual efficacy of these different vaccines. It says...
Vaccines Did Not Save Us Ė 2 Centuries of Official Statistics
This is the data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here 2 centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies.
(A: It goes to say that the improvement and the abating of diseases has gone down because of better health, sanitation and food, good drinking water, higher standards of living. Well thatís always been known as well. Thatís always been known too.) The main advances in combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean drinking water. Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living conditions also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research. . .
It gives you the facts and thereís a PDF to download, a big long one, and lots of information on it, child nutrition, all that kind of stuff, and how everythingís been reduced basically through, as I say, sanitation, good food, better food Ė not this... Itís bad food again by the way, itís gone back to bad because itís run by the chemical industry. But better sanitation and health and cleanliness, and folk arenít crammed, you know, 12 to a little room as they were during the industrial revolution. So it gives you the facts on it so you can have a perusal of that for yourself and come to your own conclusions. And it also has links to big law suits against pharma, that theyíve admitted Ė thereís an awful lot of them there Ė when they tell you thereís no harm in Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine and hereís all these quiet law suits going on and they actually give the cash and admit, yeah, they caused it. And autism too.
Now, sometimes you get a stunner Ė I call it a stunner Ė because big sciences are behind video games. They always have been. Itís no secret. Theyíve come out with their mainstream articles in the past talking about how initially these games were designed for the military, so that they would kill quickly, automatically, in a Pavlovian fashion, without thinking of the fact that Iím killing a human being. So they gave them video games, and then they gave them to the children. And I said years ago, this was because they wanted to raise a generation of people whose minds had been altered by the video games, just like troops, and these will be the guys whoíll be going round your doors dragging you out of the house, when itís time to come and get you at home. This article simply is another one of the many articles to do with the fact that new studies prove that the games alter, actually alter brain function. Thereís so many articles on this. It wonít matter because most mums will go out and keep Johnny happy by giving into his demands, or his tantrums, because everybody else has got one, mum, and theyíll get their little video game to make it worse.
Violent video games alter brain function
upi.com / Dec. 3, 2011
INDIANAPOLIS, Dec. 3 (UPI) -- The brains of young men changed in brain areas associated with cognitive function after one week of violent video game play, U.S. researchers say.
Dr. Yang Wang of the Indiana University School of Medicine and colleagues showed a direct relationship between playing violent video games over an extended period of time and a subsequent change in brain regions associated with cognitive function and emotional control. (A: Very important... emotional control.)
The controversy over whether violent video games are potentially harmful to players has been debated for many years, Wang said.
"For the first time, we have found that a sample of randomly assigned young adults showed less activation in certain frontal brain regions following a week of playing violent video games at home," Wang said in a statement.
The study involved 28 healthy adult males, ages 18-29, with low past exposure to violent video games, randomly assigned to two groups of 14.
Members of the first group were instructed to play a shooting video game for 10 hours at home for one week and refrain from playing the following week. The second group did not play a video game at all during the two-week period, Wang said. (A: So they had a control study group.)
Each of the 28 men underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis (A: That tells you what part of your brain lights up, thatís actually working at the time.) at the beginning of the study, with follow-up after one and two weeks.
"The findings indicate that violent video game play has a long-term effect on brain functioning," (A: Thatís interesting too.) Wang said. "These effects may translate into behavioral changes over longer periods of game play." (A: But they also affect the emotional parts of the brain as well. Really what youíre seeing is almost the same as a psychopath, with the imaging; the front part isnít working up at all; thereís no emotion. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix. The US has so much weaponry, because itís such a big maker of weaponry. They use to do jokes about it many years ago about selling it off, and other cartoons would have the country sinking under all the weaponry and missiles and so on. This article here says...
The Pentagon Is Offering Free Military Hardware To Every Police Department In The US
businessinsider.com / Robert Johnson | Dec. 5, 2011
The U.S. military has some of the most advanced killing equipment in the world that allows it to invade almost wherever it likes at will.
We produce so much military equipment that inventories of military robots, M-16 assault rifles, helicopters, armored vehicles, and grenade launchers (A: ...everywhere...) eventually start to pile up and it turns out a lot of these weapons are going straight to American police forces to be used against US citizens.
Benjamin Carlson at The Daily reports on a little known endeavor called the "1033 Program" that gave more than $500 million of military gear to U.S. police forces in 2011 alone.
1033 was passed by Congress in 1997 to help law-enforcement fight terrorism and drugs, but despite a 40-year low in violent crime, police are snapping up hardware like never before. (A: Itís Christmas isnít it?) While this year's staggering take topped the charts, next year's orders are up 400 percent over the same period.
This upswing coincides with an increasingly military-like style of law enforcement most recently seen in the Occupy Wall Street crackdowns.
Tim Lynch, director of the Cato Institute's project on criminal justice told The Daily, ďThe trend toward militarization was well under way before 9/11, but itís the federal policy of making surplus military equipment available almost for free that has poured fuel on this fire.Ē
(A: Itís not hard to see where itís all going. This is all going to get used with flash mobs and so on, which the think tanks who work for the military projecting the future have come out with before. I put two up before too, of their omnibus exposťs from the think tanks themselves who advise the military for Britain and the US and NATO, and they all coincide with what they believe is going to happen as we go into eventually even food rationing. Thereíll be riots for food, under austerity plans, and of course the economy going down the tube, all manufacturing done in China. And riots will eventually break out, sparked, as they claim. They call them flash mobs. Theyíve got weaponry including basically battlefield nukes to deal with large emergencies. All this stuff took place, you know, back in the 80s, when Margaret Thatcher was in in Britain and Reagan was in the US.† I donít know if you ever saw the movie called Threads, it was called Threads, to do with the arming for a possible ĎMAD destructioní they called it, mutually assured destruction, with Russia, Soviet Russia at the time. There was a documentary that went along with it and they talked to the top police chiefs who were given total power over countries like Britain. And you should hear this character, like a Nero, talking down to the people asking him questions. He says, yes we have total power, complete total power over every citizen, etc, etc. And thatís when they started to militarize and change their whole ideas of what policing was all about. And the same was happening within the US as well. Weíre now living in... it was all planned to end up this way. Everything thatís happened was planned to end up where we are today. But back in the 80s is when they came out with all the big think tanksí reports on the coming collapses, etc, collapses of countries, rogue nations, defaulting nations, and how they would deal with the civil unrest as it all went down the tubes. And here we are living with them. And here they are armed the same as the military. They even get trained with the military now. Theyíve been training with the military since at least the 90s, the early 90s, the police. So it says...)
ďItís kind of had a corrupting influence on the culture of policing in America,Ē Lynch says. ďThe dynamic is that you have some officer go to the chief and say, people in the next county have [military hardware], if we donít take it some other city will. Then they acquire the equipment, they create a paramilitary unit, and everything seems fine.
ďBut then one or two years pass. They say, look weíve got this equipment, this training and we havenít been using it. Thatís where it starts to creep into routine policing.Ē (A: And thatís whatís happening now, all these SWAT teams turn up just itching, itchy fingers to test out all their gear and kill real people. And they really are like that folks. Thereís folk like that, unfortunately they get selected, with psychological testing, and theyíre like that. They want to kill, they want to kill their own people.)
Weíre in a bad way. I hope you realize weíre in a bad way. And it was intended to get to this stage. Intended to. Whenever you see governments put any laws on the books you know darn well theyíre going to expand those laws every year by amendments. Same thing. And when you give all this weaponry to the cops then theyíre going to start to want to eventually use them, and then bring them, and expand it into domestic disputes and things like that, which they already have been using as reasons.
So again, bad, bad signs, but this was all predicted a long time ago, when the whole idea of policing, and the whole idea of what even government was changed. Back in the 70s the Club of Rome said that democracy doesnít work, we shall have to bring in a form of authoritarianism. Now, this is one of the biggest think tanks for the United Nations and for the other countries as well; they all listen to the Club of Rome think tank. It also spawned off a couple of other think tanks which are associated with it which deal with other things across the world, including your carbon taxes that are coming up. Itís a big, big player and they said that authoritarianism would be the only way to rule over the public in a new post-democratic society. And this is all, all youíre seeing, with this militarization and terrorism everywhere, which is nothing nowhere. Itís all in the ether, you understand. Itís not in reality. Itís in the ether. But everythingís being used as an excuse to bring in this totalitarian society.
And youíre being trained. When they put cameras along the streets youíre being trained to behave differently than when you would if you were not being observed. And they know that too. You canít be spontaneous and have fun or play around with your pals on the way to a store or whatever. You know youíre being watched so you end up like the dull characters you would see in these old Soviet Union or Stasi areas of East Germany. You would see, no one looks up, no one looks down, you just look at the sidewalk and donít look at anybody in the eye. And youíre being watched. Thatís behavior modification. Remember what Skinner said? If you want to change the people themselves, their behavior, you put something different in their environment. So even though you donít know youíre being changed, youíre adapting and changing to them. Thatís what your masters want. And itís working.
Now, in the Occupy Wall Street movement, thereís been exposťs come out, already, to do with the fact that Soros and many of the big players were behind all of this as well. Not totally of course, most people probably were decent people who were just so sick and fed up of the scams of the same clique running the money system and plundering the public over and over again and then getting rewarded by taxpayersí money. Taxpayers whoíll be in debt forever trying to pay it off and these guys start giving themselves bonuses before you know it. But at the top, always be careful of mass movements. Youíre always led by those who USE the mass movement. That was the same after the revolution in Russia of 1905 and then the Socialist Parties were granted power and then you had the coup in 1917 with the Bolshevik Party. I could go on about the Bolshevik Party, but anyway, they jumped in and took it over.† So they use everyone else to do the dirty work and then they jump in and take over, and theyíre ruthless. And the same old things would happen all down through history; weíre only given left-wing or right-wing, left-wing or right-wing. Both sides are run by the banking boys. Iím talking about the international moneylending families, they own them both. Look at your history of them. Look at Anthony Suttonís books, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Who Financed Hitler and so many others, well documented books that really went into archives. And this article here says...
Activist Boasts of Communist Leadership in Occupy Movement Ė
Links (A: Actually links...) to Re-election of Obama
biggovernment.com / Trevor Loudon
While addressing a gathering of the international communist front World Federation of Democratic Youth (A: That is one of their fronts, folks.), in Lisbon Portugal, November 10, 2011, Young Communist League USA organizer Lisa Bergmann, boasted of communist leadership in the US ďOccupyĒ movement and their desire to harness the movement to the re-election campaign of President Barack Obama. (A: That tells you right off the bat that the banks run them both, because it doesnít matter who you put in as President, this guyís proven here, Barack Obama, that heís on the side of Wall Street and all the same guys as all the whiteys before him. Heís chosen, and aahhh, people get fooled all the time, eh.)
Addressing the assembled young comrades, Bergmann made no bones about communist participation in, and initiation of, ďOccupyĒ encampments all over the United States. (Emphasis added)
My name is Lisa Bergmann from the Young Communist League USA. On behalf of our organization I would like to thank WFDY and the Japaneses Communist Party for hosting this inspiring, well-organized event and for ensuring that the YCLUSA could be here with all of you today. The Young Communist League USA stands firmly, as it always has, united with all of you against U.S. imperialism, greed, and warÖ
Youth in the United States are shouting at the top of their lungs that the U.S. capitalist economic system has failed themÖ thousands of youth in the United States are taking to the streets to demand a better world.
Inspired by the ďArab SpringĒ and other youth movements in Europe and Latin America, the Occupy Wall Street Movement began in the heart of the U.S. capitalist system, and has now spread to more than 300 cities in the United States. (A: And she goes on and on and on. So basically, you jump out of the frying pan into the fire if you follow the two ones that are always offered to you, and theyíre always run by the same people by the way. If you know what I mean.)
In Britain, the National Health Service, this thing here has been slashed so many times to the bone. See, people in Britain, I donít think theyíve ever had the illusion they were worth very much, by the masters that run the system. Theyíve never really had that, you know. Even less today because weíre even seeing the kind of... At one time politicians would humor the public and give little sly comments once in a while about the public. But now they donít even bother, they just tell you what they think of you all. And weíre all supposed to be grateful if you got a job at all, even though governmentís been your main problem since the time government was invented. Anyway it says...
NHS must come clean over use of 'death pathway'
telegraph.co.uk / Rebecca Smith, Medical Editor / 2 Dec 2011
(A: You see, euthanasiaís coming to the top. This was discussed years ago, at the same time they were doing Threads, by the way, in the 80s. Well youíre going to have all these postindustrial people with no work to do and they might get restless and overturn the government, what will we do, you know. Euthanasia was discussed, ways of sedating them by putting lithium in the water was discussed; itís back in the news today in fact. And various other methods were discussed to keep them all quiet and happy and doped. Remember as far back as some of the big planners, world planners, Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxleyís brother, and Bertrand Russell, they talked about different drugs to keep the people from getting restless, put in the water supply, food, or even sprayed upon them Ė I think theyíve done all of these things to be honest with you, and theyíve attacked us through vaccinations. A lot of folk you canít rile up about anything, honestly. And you kind of look at them... and you know, they can function and they can work but you just kind of look at them. Thereís just no angst about anything, things that you should be angry about. So this death pathway is also one thing to do; itís to step up euthanasia. Rather than pay, take away their profits, you see, basically, by treating you in hospital if youíre elderly... See, the United Nations stated that a good global citizen was a good producer AND consumer. When youíre elderly and youíre taking your pension, that really annoys the government; theyíd rather you just died and left the pension for them to blow on something else, you know, or pocket. So they talked about euthanasia, increasing that, and thatís why you get the increasing movements towards euthanasia. Theyíre all highly sponsored and paid for from either government grants or government and private grants, from the big foundations. So they call them death pathways in Britain. God help you if youíre going to get old. God help you if you have no families anymore to help you. God help you all. Because Iíve seen it all, whatís coming.)
A leading doctor has called for the NHS to reveal the true extent of the use of the controversial 'death pathway' after a report found up to half of families are not informed of its use. (A: Thatís when their relatives go into hospital.)
Loves ones are not always told the relative is on the controversial Death Pathway.
In a quarter of hospitals trusts, discussions were not held with one in three families.
Thousands of patients in the NHS are put onto the Liverpool (A: And this is what they call it... ) Care Pathway (A: Itís your exit pathway! Theyíre going to make sure you exit, you know.) each year in their last days and hours.
It aims to give patients a 'good death' (A: ...a Ďgoodí death, you see..) by avoiding unnecessary and burdensome medical intervention (A: They donít feed you or give you water. [Alan laughing.] Thatís burdensome... burdensome medical intervention...) but there have been accusations it hastens death because it can involve the removal of artificial hydration and nutrition. (A: They let you starve to death, folks. THIS IS THE 21st century. If you donít get that, folks, you donít DESERVE to get anything else.)
A report into palliative care in the NHS found that in one, unnamed hospital trust, half of families were not told that their loved one had been placed on the LCP (A: The Pathway...) and in a quarter of trusts, one in three families were not informed.
Dr Patrick Pullicino, a consultant neurologist at East Kent University Hospitals, said it was vital that more information was made available about the use of the Liverpool Care Pathway in the National Health Service.
He said: "We need to know how frequently it is being used. (A: We donít even know how frequently itís being used. Theyíre just throwing people in there and keeping quiet about it... starving them to death, you know.) Data should be released showing the proportion of patients who die in hospital who were on the Liverpool Care Pathway and how many were on it against their will or that of their family." (A: And itís got a bunch of related articles as well.)
You understand, they donít want to spend the cash on medication or life extension or anything else, or even getting you well enough to go home. That suits the government. As I say, you go home, youíll be collecting your pension.† THEY want that. They want that, you see. They want your pension. If you get old, thatís all youíre worth folks, is what they can get out of you. If they canít strip organs out of you and sell them, whatever, thatís the only function you have. This is how hard the world is today. This is how cruel the world is today. Iím not kidding you. Iím not kidding you. Hereís an article here. Itís to do with cremation.
A dead heat - crematorium to sell power for National Grid
(A: Thatís how they sell it to the public, the idea. So crematoriums are going to funnel in power to the national grid, you see. Isnít that nice?)
A crematorium is planning to become the first in the UK to generate electricity to sell to the National Grid - by using heat from its furnaces. (A: Here they are, free energy again. They make use of you Ė Iíve said this before Ė even after youíre dead, by doing post mortems, or autopsies on you, and this guyís got to get paid by the State, you see, tax money; itís a big clique that works in that business. And if they canít harvest any organs out of you too, you know, or if they can theyíll sell them Ė big money, big money Ė and then they take whatís left and they throw you into this crematorium so that you can heat the local area. You know, itís called a ďdead heatĒ...)
A dead heat - crematorium to sell power for National Grid
telegraph.co.uk / Jasper Copping / 27 Nov 2011
Many crematoria are currently replacing their furnaces, to meet government targets (A: ...government targets. Thatís your government for you, folks.) on preventing mercury emissions from escaping into the atmosphere. (A: No kidding. This is the reason theyíre doing it? You see, because weíve been lying to you for years, yeah mercury IS poison, you know, unless you get it in a vaccine. Iíll continue with this when I come back from this break. Incredible! Weíre getting used to heat towns now, and they get us for free. Back with more after this.)
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix. Actually Iíll take a call now. Thereís Barrett from Idaho on the line if heís still there. Are you still there Barrett?
Barrett: Yeah, howís it goiní Alan?
Alan: Yes, go ahead.
Barrett: Yeah, what if you do everything right... You buy gold, you buy silver, you got a cache of food, you get your ammunition, your firearms, so you can protect your food and your stuff. When the smoke clears whoís to say the governmentís not going to do what they did in 1933, take our gold away, and in í64, you know, the silver, and just, you know, take our firearms like they did in Katrina?† The military came in and did that.
Alan: Thereís nothing government isnít capable of doing by law. Sure. And they did confiscate gold before and they certainly could do it again. And they can also pass laws saying anyone trading in it or accepting it can be locked up, you know, or put in prison. They can do anything to stop it from happening, absolutely, yeah. And I was just thinking today, you get these little quips that go through your head sometimes, and I was thinking about how people keep saying, whenís all this going to happen, you know. And over the last 10-15 years, I had a picture of a house standing there and then the house is taken away by the mortgage company, itís just dragged off the lot you know, and thereís the guy sitting there, in the mud, clutching onto his rusty old firearm, and a bag of gold with him, and heís still saying, they wonít get this from my cold dead hands. I thought, whatís the point when you let it get to that stage? You know. Thereís no point at all. Youíve already lost everything else. Youíve lost your jobs. Youíve given all your jobs to China. Youíve been ransacked by the government and the bankers, in collusion. And sure, it doesnít matter what you do, they can take it all from you, you know. Even if you want to store it in a house and hang onto a house, whoís to say theyíre going to allow you to even stay in that house, during times of crisis? The whole idea is for mass evacuations Ė this is what theyíve got planned Ė mass evacuations when riots break out and that kind of thing break out. This is all on their military sheets. You know, so, yeah, I mean, you can try and do all the right things, it doesnít guarantee that youíre going to come out unscathed. Thatís your whole problem with things.
The whole idea is never to allow things.... STOP ADAPTING.... stop adapting to everything thatís rammed down your throat. You got to stop adapting and say hey thatís enough, in fact itís more than enough, letís get rid of all these laws and go back to having some freedom again. We canít have government rule by secrecy. Thatís not government rule at all. Thatís called tyranny. And you canít live under tyranny, unless youíre very happy with it. And some people are happy with it, the entertainmentís rolling along, you know. And I get the mail sent to me where, yep, hereís these latest dancers trying to outdo the other dancers by pretending theyíre having sex on the stage Ė maybe theyíre having it, I donít know. I mean, yep, thereís lots of that to goggle your eyes as everything burns and sinks. But who knows, I mean... But you donít allow things to get to that kind of... Even in ancient times, philosophers warned against the use of tyranny, in lieu of safety. When you give up safety you have no freedom or security. When you give up freedom, I should say, you have no security. Giving up freedom means you have no security, thatís the bottom line. But folk adapt and they adapt to everything else that comes along.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. Remember too, help me out at my end as well. Go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US-Canada Integration Step-by-Step--Armed US Police to
Operate in Canada
US Agents Laundered Drug Money
More Immigration for Britain
History of Vaccine Effectiveness Contradicts Historical Evidence
Violent Video Games alter Cognitive Function and Empathy Dysfunction
Pentagon Offering Free Military Hardware to Every Police Department in the US
Young Communist League Backs Obama
National Health Service and "Death Pathway"
Crematoriums to Feed Nat. Grid with Free Natural Resources