October 27th, 2011 (#950)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Oct 27th, 2011:
Be Convinced by Psychological
Encroachment,
Abort the Child if You're Not Important:
"Marketers are Busy on Depopulation,
Working for U.N., Bringers of Devastation,
New Normal Says it's Safer to Have an Abortion,
Why Bother with Childbirth and Contortion,
Yes, Instinct for Children is de Rigueur,
But Don't You Want to Keep Your Figure?
Coincides with the Hype on Sustainability,
Working for Greater Good and Utility,
The Internationalists, Drafting Up Treaties
Say We've Evolved into Two Kinds of Species,
The Majority Belong to a Bygone Age
Of Industry, Coal, The Miners' Cage,
So Be Good, Don't Breed, Then Die Off,
Leave World to "Betters" and the Bankster Toff"
© Alan Watt Oct 27th, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Oct 27th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, on the 27th of October, 2011. For newcomers, I always tell you to help yourself to the free audios, which are available for download, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And hopefully, you’ll understand the big system. It is a system, an integrated system that runs the world, with its own planners, think tanks, big money boys, the big bankers are all in on it, of course. And they plan the future. And they plan the present. And it’s been going on for an awful long time, this whole system. Why give up power to chance if you don’t make the future happen to benefit yourself? That’s how they see things. And they’re quite right actually, that’s the truth. That’s how you do hold on to power. You simply make the future come to pass the way you want it to come to pass, with yourself still in power, or your offspring taking over in the same positions. Especially money control, everything revolves around the private creation and the management of money, and lending to governments. So, I show you the big foundations, the organizations, the parallel government, the NGOs, etc, all involved in this system. And where they’re taking you into austerity, depopulation is a big part of it. The United Nations is prattling on about it again. They always do at this time of year. And of course, we’ve all got to basically reduce the population, eat a lot less, and even eat insects, in fact. Even some of the big television stations are promoting chef shows on eating insects. Isn’t that wonderful? That’s for all you lot, mind you, not for the ones at the top. And I have no doubt they can pull it off if they make it trendy enough and sex it up. They always sex things up. That’s what they call it.
And remember too, you’re the audience that bring me to you, so you can help me keep going by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating. From the US to Canada, you can use a personal check, or you can send cash. Or, you can use an international postal money order from your post office. It’s the same price as an ordinary postal order. And you can use PayPal. You’ll find out how to do it at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And remember, straight donations are awfully welcome as we go through this farce of inflation. Across the rest of the world, you’ve got Western Union, you’ve got Money Gram, and you’ve also got PayPal, once again. And, once again, straight donations are awfully welcome. Young people today, very few will actually donate, because they think everything should be free. They really believe that’s how it is. And they don’t realize that whatever really is truly free is there to indoctrinate them. Basically, that’s it, simple as that.
So, anyway, what I try to do here is to document really the big foundations, organizations, and how structures work with other parts of the structures to keep this system in place. And to always keep the public totally distracted on trivia and irrelevancies, as we go through the biggest changes, the biggest changes, as this World Order is a Socialist type World Order, run by the big bankers on top, with thousands of think tanks working for them. And they want to bring in this type of Fabian Society, their utopia, where massive government and bureaucracies and governmental agencies will make sure that everyone is monitored, and actually upgraded, if you like, from cradle to grave, for a peaceful society. They’ve already got these projects running in places like Scotland, and other parts of Europe. And Sarkozy was one of the guys who helped design it, supposedly. He certainly pushed it. So, we’re going through into the planned society. And remember, I put up one of the documentaries, a few years ago, the Soviet Story was one of them. And you’ll see Shaw, the writer, who was one of the founders of the Fabian Society, saying that you, you, all of you people, the ordinary people will come to us, and you must justify why we should keep you alive in our system. Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And I’ve gone over so many of the foundations over the years, and mentioned various books like Foundations: Their Power and Influence. And nothing has changed, really. Think tanks run the world. They advise all governments. They’re all privately owned, of course. You don’t vote the think tanks in, however their policies end up being pushed on you. So it’s only quite natural that a small clique really of world managers run the world, along with the banking boys who will never ever give up their hold over the cash system and the money creation business, and lending to governments, because that’s total control. That’s more powerful than armies, because every government must pay their armies from the cash they get from you. And so that’s why the guys that went into money lending, thousands of years ago, knew they were going to be the winners. And that’s just the way it is, until people kick them out and put their own system in. And some countries did that at one time. But they won’t give up, of course. And just that’s the way it is.
Now, we know too that bread and circuses is what the public get, especially at election times. And it’s even more so in the US, because they literally have balloons and things, balloons and guys dressed like clowns, and like a festival parade, a big circus of things. And it’s kind of bizarre and surrealistic, if you think you’re voting someone in that you don’t really know at all, except he’s smiling a lot and holding a balloon. And he’s got the power to declare war, or get you all fighting someone else, that you’ve never heard of before generally, for a reason you’ll never understand. And, but it’s all done in a festival scenario. Well, I’ve talked about the culture industry before, and how the Pentagon works so heavily with Hollywood, and the music business too, by the way, and all the arts, in fact. And here’s Obama off to Hollywood. And it says here, this is from the Hollywood Reporter:
Among the small group of industry insiders who were invited to attended the early-morning meeting with the president at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel were: Weinstein Co. studio head Harvey Weinstein, CAA managing partner and music head Rob Light, ICM president Chris Silbermann, Modern Family creator Steve Levitan, Atlantic Records chairman Craig Kallman, producer/songwriter Bruce Roberts, talent manger and producer Jason Weinberg, UTA music agent Rob Prinz, talent manager and producer Eric Ortner, Island Def Jam senior vice president Karen Kwak, Warner Bros. Records president Livia Tortella, talent manager Greg Mertz....
(Alan: And so on it goes, on and on, Mara Buxbaum, Bruce Flohr, Michael Green, Tom Sturges, etc. It says:)
The event was not a fundraiser, and attendees were not asked to donate to the Obama reelection campaign. But those invited have been ardent supporters of the president and were identified as "influencers"
(A: Now this is the culture industry, the culture creation business. They not only create culture, they update it and alter it, and decide where it’s to go. A big part, even to do with the promiscuous society we live in today, because we emulate what we see, monkey see, monkey do. A very old trick, of course, but it works all the time. Anyway, it says they are the:
"influencers” with the ability to help Obama shape the national political conversation heading into a tough race in 2012.
(A: So, in other words, these are the people who literally come up with the fantastic ideas for campaigns. And remember, these are guys who deal with fiction and entertainment. And they run your lives, the serious business of your lives. They give you little slogans to chant and things like that. It says:)
An insider who attended the hour-long meeting with the Obama campaign staff tells THR that the vibe was casual. The president appeared for about 25 to 30 minutes, telling the group that his campaign would be tough and he needed their help to engage the Hollywood community in particular and the general public at large.
The meeting comes at a time when Obama seems to be grappling with how close his campaign should align itself with the entertainment industry.
I mean they’re joined at the hip. How can you get closer than that, you know? And they’re always in and out of, so was the same with Clinton too, they’re always in and out of the White House. Some of them slept there. Anyway, he’s been there quite a few times, to drum up support, and to come up with strategies. So that’s not too bad. You go to the top, these are the guys who can certainly do it, because they’ve altered whole nations in the way that their culture is and behaves, etc.
And I’ve also mentioned too that part of the big objective of this world agenda is to do with depopulation. What they always do, and what they had planned to do a long time ago, is they told the countries that were first world at the time, the producing countries, to have fewer children, which they did, because people across Europe were pretty obedient. They followed the orders and had about one child per family, maybe two max, and the population dropped. And then Thatcher got in, and she says, there’s not enough people to pay off the national debt, and there’s folk getting older, and there’s no children to take up the slack. So, the floodgates to immigration were opened quite a bit. They’d already been opened before she came, but they opened it further to the most diverse nations and cultures. And then, Tony Blair came in and he literally, I think, blew away the wall of the dam altogether. And that came out in the press from the assistant prime minister, who was told to do that very thing, let them all in. He says, to destroy the culture, and even the history of Britain forever, so it could never, ever re-emerge the way it was before. That’s been awfully, awfully good. So, whenever you hear a story like this one, you know it’s part of the agenda of destruction. It says:
4,000 foreign criminals set free to fight deportation including murderers, rapists and child sex offenders
Thousands let out of detention centres because there was ‘no prospect of them being deported in a reasonable time'
(A: Now, do you really believe that? Do you really believe that’s the reason? It says:)
Nearly 4,000 foreign criminals who should have been deported are at large on the streets of Britain, an official report revealed last night.
Human rights claims and red tape are giving them their freedom while they fight deportation orders.
The criminals include dozens of former prisoners convicted of offences such as murder, rape and sex crimes against children.
The figure emerged in a report by John Vine, chief inspector of the UK Border Agency.
He revealed there were 3,775 criminals in May this year who had been released from immigration detention centres because there was ‘no prospect of them being deported in a reasonable time…
Of those, 3,259 had served sentences for low-level offences,
(A: That’s like drugs and shoplifting, and stuff like that.)
another 429 for ‘more serious’ crimes, and 87 for the most serious offences – including murder, rape and paedophilia.
Some are unable to be deported because it is thought ‘unsafe’ to send them back to their home countries, or because of difficulties in getting hold of a passport so they can be put on a plane.
Last year, a total of 576 used the Human Rights Act to prevent them from being kicked out, the report found, with the vast majority citing Article 8, the controversial ‘right to a private and family life’.
(A: Clause, I guess. So that’s really how it is.)
In the past, the courts allowed immigrants to stay if they had a wife and children, but in recent years judges have extended its reach to include a rapist with a ‘social life’
(A: Maybe he only raped his neighbors. I don’t know.)
and a killer who lived with his parents.
During the inspection, immigration officials complained to Mr Vine that British courts were interpreting Article 8 much more liberally than European Court of Human Rights judges sitting in Strasbourg.
Worryingly, the Government lost one in three human rights cases which went to appeal.
(A: Anyway, it says:)
Between February 2010 and January this year, 425 foreign prisoners won their appeal against deportation. Another 151 were given permission to stay by Home Office officials.
So, what it’s to do, it’s to put more on the streets to create more crime, and the cops love it. The judges love it. And they always get more cops. And this is the time now too, for private cops in Britain. There’s quite a few places across Britain that have hired big teams from security companies. One of them is Force something or another, they call it. Force something company, corporation. They’re now the policemen. So, privatization has taken over, and of course, they’d love nothing better than to say, oh, there’s so much crime out there. And then they can hire more guys on, and become much, much bigger. So that’s what they do. And of course, the law system needs crime to survive. It’s a very lucrative field to be in. And they need lots of crime as well. But it also makes the country seem unsafe, you see. The more crime there is, the more unsafe you feel, and the more power you give personally to government, to do what they want, which they actually do do, of course. They use that.
And in the UK is a good example too, for, I’ve talked about Tony Blair who’s in the Quartet, they call this private little club of four, that’s got some strange deal working where they get paid by the British Government to be sort of envoys in a sort of official, unofficial capacity. And at the same time, Tony Blair fills his pockets by making deals for his master, J.P. Morgan, wherever he happens to go, at the same time, of course. And here’s another one too. Margaret Thatcher, who’s been out of the picture for a long time:
Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
(A: After she retired. It says:)
Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has claimed £535,000 of taxpayers' money over the last five years, government records have shown.
Baroness Thatcher, 86, who makes rare public appearances and suffers poor health, was paid from the public duties cost allowance available to ex-PMs.
Others to benefit have been her successor John Major, paid £490,000 in the last five years,
(A: They’re all out of office, eh. And, of course, Tony Blair, eh.)
In 2008-9, Mr Blair claimed £169,076 - more than his Downing Street salary.
(A: So, that’s basically like, you’ve retired from your work, but you pop in because you showed up at some little do, where they had a big dinner, and you said a few words, and so you get paid for prattling, even though technically she’s out, the public shouldn’t be paying her anymore. But they have all these special things worked out for them. It says:)
Since leaving office, Mr Blair, who ran the country
(A: Well, he actually ruined the country.)
for a decade from 1997, has claimed just under £273,000.
What a greedy psychopath this guy is. You should see the deals he’s making all over the planet for himself. It’s just disgusting, and getting away with it. Getting away with it. Anyway, I’ll be back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And everyone has been prattling on about this bill, this Protect IP bill to do with internet. And it’s been renamed, E-PARASITES Act, according to some here, which would create the Great Firewall of America. It says:
PROTECT IP Renamed E-PARASITES Act; Would Create The Great Firewall Of America
As was unfortunately expected, the House version of PROTECT IP has been released (embedded below) and it's ridiculously bad. Despite promises from Rep. Goodlatte, there has been no serious effort to fix the problems of the Senate bill, and it's clear that absolutely no attention was paid to the significant concerns of the tech industry, legal professionals, investors and entrepreneurs. There are no two ways around this simple fact: this is an attempt to build the Great Firewall of America. The bill would require service providers to block access to certain websites, very much contrary to US official positions on censorship and internet freedom, and almost certainly in violation of the First Amendment.
(A: Well, that’s in the mud anyway. It’s been in the mud for quite some time. It says:)
Oh, and because PROTECT IP wasn't enough of a misleading and idiotic name, the House has upped the ante. The new bill is called: "the Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act"
(A: There’s a mouthful for you.)
or the
(A: And they call it the)
E-PARASITE Act (though, they also say you can call it the "Stopping Online Piracy Act").
The bill is big, and has a bunch of problems. First off, it massively expands the sites that will be covered by the law. The Senate version at least tried to limit the targets of the law (but not the impact of the law) on sites that were "dedicated to infringing activities" with no other significant purposes (already ridiculously broad), the new one just targets "foreign infringing sites" and "has only limited purpose or use other than" infringement.
So, they’re really taking off with that. I’ll put that up tonight too, and all the other articles that I talk about, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the broadcast. So, that’s going on there. And another one too to do with the same one. I’ll put that up too. That’s from Technology and Science, and CBC News. They talk about that. Plus, there’s one in Canada, actually. First, this other one is:
Privacy watchdog reiterates lawful access concerns
(A: This is to do with Canada, this one. And I’ve mentioned it already about a week or two ago.)
Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart expressed particular concern about a proposal to allow police to obtain subscriber data from internet service providers without a warrant, including names, unlisted phone numbers and IP addresses.
(A: That would let them go so far and bypass the courts altogether.)
In an open letter to Public Safety Minister Vic Toews on Wednesday, Jennifer Stoddart reiterated her criticisms of "lawful access"
(A: They want a law passed to give them the right to do what otherwise would be illegal. So they’ve got to call it lawful access. That way they could break any law, if they get that kind of law passed for them. It says:)
introduced in the last session, and said she felt it was important to set them out again before the government reintroduces such provisions.
(A: And then she goes through:)
The previous lawful access bills — C-50, C-51 and C-52 — "would have had a significant impact on our privacy rights," Stoddart wrote.
"These bills went far beyond simply maintaining investigative capacity or modernizing search powers. Rather, they added significant new capabilities for investigators to track, and search and seize digital information about individuals."
Stoddart expressed particular concerns about a proposal in the previous legislation that would have required internet service providers to give subscriber data to police and national security agencies without a warrant, including names, unlisted phone numbers....
(A: And etc.)
Stoddart said that amounts to "circumventing the courts to obtain personal information."
"Only prior court authorization provides the rigorous privacy protection Canadians expect," Stoddart wrote.
And it’s true enough, too. And believe you me, there’s a lot of police. It’s happening in the States and other countries too. There’s a lot of police who do a lot of moonlighting, you might say, with other private companies, etc. And there’s a lot of your data being sold via the police, now that a lot of them in other countries have access to your data. An awful lot of that is going on. Big business, actually. So, anyway, they’re pushing ahead for it. And eventually every police station will be sitting listening to everybody if they’re bored stiff. All your phone calls. And, of course, it gives them more police establishments dedicated to that task. So, you understand, every government agency that’s hired on, it doesn’t matter how it starts and what it starts for, it wants to expand. They all expand. And they get different departments, which makes them feel more secure in what they do; in other words, they can’t be just all fired or laid off. They’re too important now just to let go. So they love to keep building new departments. And there are countries now where police departments are listening to everybody. They’re watching what you watch on the internet in real time. And this is of course what the whole darn system was designed eventually to do anyway, I’m pretty sure. So, that’s Canada.
Now, this article here is from Sovereign Independent:
Culling the Herd
(A: This is a big topic right now, with the United Nations. They’ve come out, for instance. And the United Nations, I think they said a few years ago, at one of their world meetings, that they could either keep 2 billion people alive in a kind of First World Country luxury, they called it, of that time, two or three years ago, and the rest of them on subsistence food and standard of living. They said, or we can basically bring down the population to keep that higher standard of living. Anyway, it says:)
Culling the Herd – How Women are Being Targeted in Eugenics Abortion Fraud!
How absurd does it have to get before women realize that that nice chap or lady in the white coat is not their best friend.
It’s true enough. There’s so many ads apparently on television with doctors with their white coats, and they always hang their stethoscopes around their neck, which is a dumb place to have it, because it would always fall off, especially if they’re running to deal with a cardiac arrest, you know. Back with more, after this break.
HI folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading an article about depopulation really, and how they use, when you get a governmental system of healthcare, politics are now involved in it. And everything that comes from a political agenda, from the top down to what is supposed to be a service, which is really authority. It becomes an authority as well. And they go into the political realm, obviously, the doctors become really like civil servants, all working for the state. And they go along with all the orders that come down from the top, from the big marketing companies that the government employs to change the minds and the ways and habits of people. And so, apparently the Telegraph had published this article, “Abortion is Safer than Having a Baby.” That’s the new normal, you see. That’s the new normal they’re pushing, and propaganda to make people believe it. So, it says:
The Hippocratic oath basically states that doctors should ‘do NO harm’ to their patients.
(A: That’s true.)
This must surely include a healthy unborn child.
But apparently not.
Now it seems that doctors will be telling women, as part of their public health policy, that abortion is now safer than childbirth. In an age when technology can split the atom, it seems a bit far-fetched to consider childbirth a life or death risk for women and abortion a suitable alternative for whatever spurious reasons such doctors deem plausible.
What kind of doctor can seriously consider telling women this ludicrous lie? If abortion was indeed safer than childbirth, then the female body would adapt to facilitate this naturally as a survival mechanism for the mother, as it indeed does in many cases of miscarriage. That is the very nature of nature.
To plant the idea in a woman’s mind when she could well be in a vulnerable and suggestible state of mind for many reasons, that abortion is the best thing for her is at best irresponsible and at worst a callous act of a doctor not worthy of the title.
(A: And so, they have here the facts and so on, and the links to what they’re on about. Also, there’s a link to the Daily Mail, which has the British family is shrinking: 60% of parents say they can’t afford a second child. And of course, they said that at the United Nations too, that economic disincentives could be foisted on the public to make it impossible to have a child. You couldn’t afford it. In fact, there’s an article recently I read on the air, about that very thing. It says:)
When the UN openly endorses China as the model state for the world with its horrendous record on human rights including their ‘one child’ policy and forced sterilisation and abortion programs, do you really think this is all a coincidence? Do you really?
And, of course, it’s no coincidence at all. And there are articles up there, there’s even documentaries they put out themselves at the United Nations, where they praise China as the model state for the world to follow. Mind you, it’s the same eugenics program all over the world, because, in China, if you’re from the upper middle classes, you can pay a little fine, if you want a second child. Because, you see, they want to breed the more intelligent, the more go-getter type, the up-and-coming type. They want to breed them. They can breed, but the rest of you, all the ones down at the bottom, the majority can’t, you see. It’s only for you. And that’s just the way it is folks. That’s Fabian Socialism.
And there’s a caller on the line, I think hanging on here. And I think it’s Justin from Florida. Are you there, Justin? Hello, Justin?
Justin: Hello, Alan. Hey, I just had an observation that I just wanted your opinion on. I was doing some thinking a little while back, and I was thinking about the tree of the knowledge for good and evil. And I was thinking, you know, about the words of Jesus in his parable, when he was talking about the trees and how a good tree can only bring forth good fruit, and a bad tree can only bring forth, you know, like the bad fruit. So, what is, I mean, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. You know, because, according to Jesus, that shouldn’t exist, you know, a tree with both good and bad fruit.
Alan: It’s an allegory or an analogy really. What they mean by that is prior to this happening, Adam and Eve, as I say, were in a pretty incredibly naïve state, in other words. They were innocent, completely innocent. So they lived in a state of blissful ignorance, you know. And the whole thing. There’s even jokes about it to do with Adam. You know, Eve is going around there with nothing on, wearing nothing at all. And you know, she’s fluffing her hair, and you know how they flick it, and stuff like that. And he’s too busy planting his cabbages and lettuces and things to take much notice. So she gets bored and goes off, and then she sees that, and she’s bored stiff, you know. And she can’t go shopping. There’s no shops anywhere, so she sees this tree. And she knows she’s not supposed to go there, of course. But she’s never had that fruit before, so she had to grab it. That’s their little joke about it. But what it really means is that they lived in a state of absolute innocence. Nothing had happened. They were not devious people. They didn’t play games with each other. They didn’t know, there was no such thing, there was nothing amoral about how they lived whatsoever. Bliss in a sense. You know how the saying is, ignorance is bliss. So, they were literally ignorant. They were ignorant of knowledge of all kinds, and therefore they lived in blissful ignorance.
What they’re trying to say is that by breaking a rule they lost the innocence, because they gained, in an analogy, they gained an insight into what was right to do and what was wrong to do. And that was what they say, in some religions, that was part of the fall. So, and then they, immediately, once they understood right, wrong, good and evil, they realized they were naked. In other words, it was the first thing that hit them was that they were naked. Before that it didn’t matter. And there was no guilt whatsoever. So, it’s a little story to tell you about that you need a higher understanding to even understand what good and evil is, otherwise you are in a blissful ignorance. However, knowledge brings consequences. Everything brings consequences. And I’ve said for many, many years, for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction. So, even for gaining knowledge, there’s a price to be paid for it.
And with intellect and knowledge, there’s definitely a high price to be paid for it, because with intellect comes cunning. And we have all the problems of today. That’s how they would probably put it across in a theological answer, you know.
Justin: Right, well, that kind of begs the question, was that tree created, you know, to be eaten, because, obviously, you know, the fruit, if it was good for food, it was there to be eaten.
Alan: Well, personally, I think Monsanto had something to do with that. (Chuckle.) Maybe it was GM. (Chuckle) You never know, eh.
Justin: Genetically modified trees, for giving knowledge.
Alan: Yeah. But the whole idea was now that they had knowledge, knowledge, when you take knowledge and intellect, and the gaining and accumulation of knowledge, then you go for the one thing that definitely Eve wanted, and this is again discussed in some theological circles, and it was thousands of years ago. Women, Eve represented women, basically. And she was the mother of all, in other words too. And, but it also showed her failings, and one was incredible vanity. And with vanity and beauty, the need to always be beautiful and live forever. And of course, that was the key for it. That’s the temptation that she had, right off the bat, when she could understand things. And she was lied to. You can become as god. You can become immortal, and in other words, she’d never age, and she’d be beautiful, etc, etc. So, it’s showing you that with awareness of anything, and once you lose that innocence and you have intellect, and you have the ability to think through things, you become rather cunning, and you can be a destroyer, as well as someone who could be a good mother, a good role model. And that’s even said in the version in India, where you have the mother goddess, basically, who is both the giver of life and the destroyer. It’s very similar.
Justin: Yes. And also, I was thinking, because, we have this knowledge of good and evil, you know. Like you said, if you don’t know evil and all you know is good, it’s just ignorance. So, in order to know that you’re in heaven you have to know the evil, so evil will never be destroyed, it will always be there. So I mean, it can never go away. It’s impossible.
Alan: Well, there’s actually schools of thought within that religion, that old, old religion, that discussed all of these things to do with the balance. And this is what all the occultic stuff, they fall into that too, they get off on what they think are secrets, but they’re not secrets at all. The balance of everything, where if everything was good, how would life be? If all was good, how would life be? Or if all was bad, how would life be? So they talk about the balance of the two, and for the complete person. The complete person must be aware of both, and maybe even experience a bit of both, to come to the proper balance themselves. I think we all do to an extent, going through life. We can touch or skirt around certain areas, before we learn, get enough wisdom, to know we must keep ourselves in balance, as well.
Justin: Yeah, and that’s the thing, you know. There really is a balance. It is. That’s what it is. That’s what the secret is.
Alan: That’s the secret, but the problem in a materialistic world, and that’s the problem with it too. Money is, it’s not just the love of money. Money is the root of all evil, in a sense.
Justin: Oh, it is, yes.
Alan: So, really, it’s all to do with the world of materialism. The whole idea of the balance, too, of good and evil, was also to do with the world of matter and the world of spirit. And at one time, they used to talk about soul and spirit. Soul was the activating force, that led you to spirit. And of course, even that was kind of copied to an extent from Egyptians. They believed that if you died without getting spirit entering into you, then that was the end of everything. You went into the big pea soup and got lost forever. Whereas if you got spirit in your lifetime, then you were truly alive. And that’s why in the New Testament, Jesus says, I come to give you life, and more abundantly. It was a spiritual thing he was talking about. So, an activating principle.
Justin: The activating principle is what makes you the individual.
Alan: Yeah. And that’s why he also said about people who didn’t have spirit, he says, let the dead bury their dead, which confused a lot of people. What he’s talking about was they might be animated, they might be walking around, but technically they’re dead without spirit.
Justin: Because they don’t have that individuality. They’re just swept along with the stream.
Alan: Creatures of instinct, they’re also called. In other words, they’ll do all the things of the world, and they’ll chase after things of the world, but they don’t seek after the higher things that are around the world but above the world as well, or wherever. The spiritual side of things, yeah.
Justin: And that’s what the allegory of all these, of the zombie movies and zombie entertainment that comes out, because you always have, you know, the group of the enlightened people, who haven’t been affected by the plague, and they’re surrounded by the dead who just want to eat them, you know, and just move on.
Alan: Yes. And even at the top of this materialistic system, you also have people who are kind of like eating zombies. They eat everything. They eat countries now through war and grab everything. They’re just like gluttons for power, owning more and more of the material. And so, you’re living in a state really, where there’s no balance at all.
Justin: Right. That’s why it’s spiraling out of control.
Alan: It is, but it’s a planned control, as we all know. They do publish well in advance what they want to take over, and what they want to accomplish. And it’s our disbelief. We don’t want to believe they really mean it. It shocks folks when they actually do it. But they do tell us where they’re taking us all, and it’s not pleasant at all. And you know, in the world of matter, I have no problem using the world evil. They are evil. And even for psychopathic, if you take the scientific term for it, which is just a scientific thing of describing the same thing, psychopaths technically are the ones who are at the top of the tree. They’re vicious. They’re cruel. They are definitely evil. People who sit and plan to take countries over and slaughter whole bunches of people, lie to their own populations as to why they’re doing it, they’re definitely evil people running the world.
Justin: Yeah, because they have no remorse and all they care about is themselves. They don’t have the ability to look, you know, into the other person’s eyes and see the other person’s pain and go, oh, well, maybe I shouldn’t do this, this is going to hurt them. All they care about is themselves.
Alan: They have no compassion whatsoever with someone outside their own club, basically. None at all. They feel nothing for people.
Justin: And that is evil.
Alan: It is evil. Absolutely. And that’s what runs the world. That’s what runs the world today. It has for an awful long time though really.
Justin: Well, thank you very much for taking my call, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Justin: You do a lot of good. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks. And we’ll go to Steven from Oregon, if Steve is there.
Steve: Hello, Alan. Are you there?
Alan: Hello.
Steve: Hello, hey. Just one quick thing, let’s talk about naked girls and sports.
Alan: Girls and sports.
Steve: I’m kidding. Hey, my friend, I appreciate you a lot, and the other caller that was just on, and I know mine is only an opinion, and that’s all it is, because we’ve all got opinions. But I think Eve had physical relations with something that brought a two-bloodlined seed, and so we got good and evil. I know really, I know it gets bigger than that. It’s kind of equal to something that we can understand. But that’s my point. And, so now we’re finding evil. And I guess probably some day, now this is just something to look at, like I said, I don’t know anything. I’m just Steven. But, at the same time, that’s something to look at. And so, basically, probably evil and good will collide some day? Maybe? I don’t know. But that’s what I look at. It was not a tree. It was not an apple. It was, I think she had sex with another entity. And I know that sounds weird, but that’s what I believe.
Alan: Well, that is discussed, as I say, in some of the old theological schools. They discuss that openly, because they’re allowed to question everything. And that is one, of course, that she had relations, put it that way, with a being that preexisted the garden, you know. In other words, from a previous age, something with intellect and something that could seduce. It had the ability, it already had the knowledge of seduction and how to do it, etc, etc. And then of course, they go into Cain and Abel. All through the Bible, there’s always two lines of everything running off, you’ll notice. There’s many instances of two different lines. One goes off to create this tribe, and one goes off to create that tribe, etc. You get so many of these instances. But you’ll find with Cain, of course, Cain slew, he kills his brother. And he’s the offspring, supposedly of this other, other being.
Steve: Can I hold, or should I just hang up?
Alan: You can hold on, sure. Back after this.
Hi folks, we’re back, and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking to Steven from Oregon about all the different theories that have come off from the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve, and what’s interesting too, of course, is, they’re all theories and they’re fun to debate and to think through all the different things, but he was touching on the fact that there’s another lineage that came out of Eve, and of course, that was Cain. And of course, that’s part of the whole theory of the Canaanites eventually came from that too. But the offspring were brighter than the other ones that she had eventually with Adam. And the offspring, Cain himself went down through time, basically, always hated, always marked, but no one was allowed to kill him. Interesting, interesting story. And he was an artificer. Weapon maker, by the way. I guess he was an arms dealer. And also, he helped to build cities. So he’s also thought to be Nimrod. And of course, you end up with the Tower of Babel and all the rest of it and wanting to be god. But it’s an interesting story for sure, and people will debate that forever, I suppose. Are you still there, Steve?
Steve: Yeah, I am here. That was amazing. So, basically, honestly, I cannot add to anything you say. It’s so amazing how you talk. So, I’m going to change the subject. Real quick, and I’ll get off right away. I saw you with a guitar. I’m sorry to change the subject, but you are so great. I’m sorry, I know you don’t like to hear that, but switching the subject. I saw you with a guitar. Are you a musician? And do you have songs or something?
Alan: Yeah, I’ve got songs out there.
Steve: And if I go on your internet, I can maybe find some or something?
Alan: Different names.
Steve: Oh, yeah. I really like to hear your music. I’m a musician too, and I’m sorry. And you cover the news so well. I just want to change the subject or something. You cover everything so well, Alan. And one last thing is, I was looking at some, and I’ll leave with this. I was just going back through some old rock and roll from the 70s. I was listening to Black Sabbath that somebody sent me. You know, and it goes, kings and queens of old, steal your life and steal your dreams. Supertramp. Oh, man there were such great bands back then that really somewhat saw the truth, huh?
Alan: Well, yeah, I mean, in those days too, you could sing about so many other things. It’s so base today. Everything has been brought down to as far as it can go. Once we hit rap, we hit the bottom, and the popular rap. And of course that was the intention of it, because I knew guys in the industry who knew this was the way it was supposed to plummet to bring down society towards the end. I met some of these guys, years before it all came out. Because that’s part of the culture industry. And they wanted to destroy all culture and remake it anew. But first you must destroy it. But then, the old bands, yeah, they could sing songs that you could whistle, that you could sing along to. It would have meaning personally, a lot of the things, because a lot of bands wrote about things which actually happened in their lives, personal things. And so you could relate to them, if you were a young person, going through the same things. And unfortunately, the whole system was directed from the top. The whole, you don’t just make yourself a star. You’re made to be a star. And there’s a big industry behind that. And they do have a political agenda, unfortunately, a social/political agenda to work on.
Steve: Thank you so much, Alan. You’re so great. I mean, I talk to you, and it’s almost like I’m talking to my best friend, and I really enjoy it. And I appreciate you taking my call.
Alan: Well, thanks for calling. And from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, remember, donate, buy the books, etc, because I don’t ask for sponsors. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests. And from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of
show covered in following links:
Obama Meets Hollywood-Culture Industry
"Influencers"
The Authorized Mess of Foreign Criminals in Britain
Private Cops in Britain
Margaret Thatcher Claims 535,000 Pounds from Public
Purse
The Great Firewall of America
Canada--Bill Enabling Police to Circumvent Courts to
Collect Personal Information
Culling
the Herd--New Normal, "Abortion is Safer than Having a Baby"
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||