Oct. 11, 2011 (#938)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Oct. 11, 2011:
Interdependence to March On, Relentless:
"The World's in Transition, Events All
Protests, Riots and Unemployment Depicted
From the Big Think-Tanks, They've Said
How Public Will Be Managed and Led,
Mass Migration as Nations Become Obsolete
And Authoritarian Regional Powers will Compete
On Behalf of Corporations for All Resources,
Look Up Strategic Trends for Their Discourses,
Big Losers are Those Selling Their Labour,
Cheapest Regions are Looked On with Favour,
Democracy Redefined, Run by Civil Leaders,
Fronts for Foundations, Bottom Feeders,
Food Scarcities to Rise, Even in West,
For International Market will Sell to Rest
Of the World Where Bid is High,
Service Economies Can Never Try
To Compete, In This World of "Interdependence",
Increasing Taxes and Change to Go on Relentless"
© Alan Watt Oct. 11, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Oct. 11, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 11th of October 2011. For newcomers, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the audios which are there for free download. There’s hundreds and hundreds of them there and hopefully by the end of it all, if you’re still holding onto your sanity, you’ll understand the big system that you were born into, that the educational system didn’t tell you about and the media certainly won’t go into it either. You’ve been run by, really, big think tanks for an awful long time, who work on behalf of those who own the world, via the economy and the economical system, which they run, and especially the international banks which they run. We do have guys who do international accounting for this particular group, and they run the whole planet. And they don’t sit and wait for crisis to happen; they plan crisis, they benefit from the crisis. And the ones we’re going through now simply are the update to their last set of crisis, which they created when they came out with the Bretton Woods and then the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, The Bank for International Settlements and other ones too, which are to take over this global society which the big boys wanted to... well, basically that’s them capping the whole system for themselves. It’s a world domination system. It ties in exactly with what Rockefeller said a long time ago that it was far better that bankers and intelligentsia – meaning academics, high academics, professors and all that – manage the world’s direction rather than leaving it up to the individual auto-determination of national sovereign nations. And that’s what we’ve been working against for all this time and most folk haven’t a clue that it’s happened. And they’re still going through it and your future’s all planned for you, including the bank crashes, and including the solutions they come out with too.
So as I say, help yourself to those. Remember too, I don’t bring on advertisers; I’m not sponsored by guests, who really are advertisers. It’s up to you to keep me going so you can buy the books and disks I have at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. There’s a bunch to choose from. [Order and donation options listed above.] Straight donations are really awfully welcome at this time because as I say, I’m not in it to make an empire of myself or to get rich and all the rest of it. I certainly get enough acclaim from a lot of people across the planet, and even sometimes the top of Google from the odd story here and there, but it certainly doesn’t pay me anything, because I don’t ask for it. It’s up to you, as I say, to keep me going if you want to. I’m not compromised, in other words, this way, by owing anything to anyone or having to go along with things that I might not agree with. So you can help me keep going by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. All the sites listed there have the audios in English and transcripts in English. If you want transcripts in other languages for print up you can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and take your pick from the choice offered there.
We are going through the biggest transition phase, as we all know of course. This is a massive transition, and they actually call it this at the top at the United Nations. They’ve been planning it for an awful long time. The 21st century was to be the Century of Change, and academia would prattle on about this in a sort of stealth language so that you wouldn’t understand what they were really on about, unless you were in on the in crowd. And of course we know what it means now. It’s Agenda 21. It’s the whole worldwide redistribution of your wealth to the big multinationals across the planet. We’ll go into that tonight and show you where it’s all going. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back. This is Cutting Through The Matrix and we truly are in this new management system. We’ve been in it for quite some time. It’s only now they’re bringing it into the next step of public/private partnership management. All governments now are using lots and lots of think tanks and outside resources, private resources, for advice on policies, etc. So when you think about it, it’s very easy for a small group of people who already own the international banking system to own these think tanks to tell the governments what to do. And the governments do that in fact, because after all, what were these characters in government before they went into government? They were lawyers or something else, and they didn’t know as much about government as the average person in the street basically. Low-level psychopaths go in. And they do what they’re told, just as long as they’re well rewarded. Therefore they’re kind of at a loss when they’re given a position over a particular area of government, like the military or whatever. The only field exercises they’ve had is really knocking a ball across a field in golf. And here they are in charge of the military one day. So they need the advice from the experts, you see, and that’s what they do. And we pay them for that, so why bother having a politician in the first place? It’s to keep the façade up that they serve the public. That’s why. If a guy in uniform came on as your representative for the government who is elected, supposedly, you’d kind of wonder about it, if they were all wearing uniforms. So it’s a good disguise.
In reality we’re going through the transition phase now. Because the old system, remember, the Club of Rome said, of democracy, it just didn’t work and they had too much to do, to accomplish, to get this mission for Agenda 21 through. In 100 years they’ve got to get a vastly reduced population; they’ve got to bring in new system where the people are taught to be awfully happy while they’re getting awfully poor actually. And I’ve got reports from some of their sites on this, how to do it and what to achieve. And even Bertrand Russell said that, the people eventually will be very happy because the government will tell them they are. And that’s really how it is, you know.
So anyway, there’s no end to this in sight because they have so many plans to bring forth, in sustainability, oh, climate change; I’ve seen it even from the Department of Defense. Climate change will be a big problem in the future because all the experts say so; that’s all the experts they allow on their panels. The ones who don’t agree with them, and there’s actually more who disagree, don’t get a mention anywhere at all. Because after all, climate change and carbon taxes, it’s a new form of control, and a vast revenue booster too for those who run the world; lots of cash to be made of it. It can also rule your life too because you won’t be allowed to do so many things that you used to do before. Control factor is very, very important in all of these measures that come out from the government or from the United Nations departments, this multitude of departments they have running the United Nations, and we all sign onto them, at least your so-called elected premiers or presidents do.
Now, sustainability is one big thing. We know that Rockefeller recently, I think it was earlier this year, called for a rapid reduction in population. He said the tradition methods which he and all the NGOs and many other foundations were funding, Bill Gates and all the rest of them, under the guise of health care across the world, was actually of course abortion. That’s really what they mean by it, for sustainability. And since the early 1970s they’ve been funding massive abortion projects across the third world. Because their think tanks at that time told them, oh, there’s going to be a massive, massive increase in the very poor people in Africa who were going to invade the West and stuff like that. Now, it’s not enough now that that’s going ahead. Now Rockefeller and all the rest of them, now that we’re pretty well global, you see, and there’s a lot of nations disappearing under consortiums like the EU, this new Soviet system that runs the whole of Europe. And America’s to go the same with Canada eventually once they get over this financial blip they got at the moment, then we have to go into one big consortium here. And they’ve set it up too, for the ASEAN countries, the Far East countries. So the same kind of thing, these blocs. We’ll all eventually disappear, with their names and even their histories being eradicated right now in fact and I’ll touch on that later, hopefully if I remember to do it.
rapid depopulation has to be introduced now, claimed Rockefeller, and there’s only a few ways they can do it. That’s to further poison your food, you see, all your food that you take. We already are poisoned with the chemicals and the GM, the modified genes and so on, that a warfare industry made now. Monsanto was in the war business and now they’re making your food to keep you healthy. And you trust them? Well, good luck to you folks if you still believe that; tune into something else, maybe a nice new age thing that gives you lots of fantasy and hope. But there’s a reason for everything that happens. You don’t bring in hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of guys who were previously looking at genetic warfare and killing ethnic peoples, specifically targeting the ethnic DNA, and make them make your food for you. There’s a little clue for you. And then you get every government on the planet, they mandate you must eat this GM food, because that’s all you’re going to get eventually. Think about it.
Now, but it’s very important under all these regulations to take count of who’s alive and who’s dying, who’s dead, etc...
Government to introduce new £170 death tax?
(Alan: This is in Britain because it’s the premier flagship.
Now, they already pay death taxes; this is for another reason.)
money.aol.co.uk / Adrian Holliday / Oct 10, 2011
Death is going to get more expensive - by about £170. Whether you are burnt or buried when you go, the government is planning to grab an extra £170 from your estate via a new death tax. It claims the tax is needed because they want to improve the accuracy of death statistics.
(A: Awfully important to know how many’s getting born, who’s dying. Now, they already know that the ethnic races that belong in Europe, for an awful long time, are on a vast decline. In fact, all their official reports go along with that, study upon study, and they’re awfully happy about that too apparently; I’ve read a lot of their articles over the years. Because they were awfully good people and they were told not to have children, have cars instead and women should have businesses going. And they all went for it and of course they had no children, or maybe one would come out of a couple of two. Most folk can’t even stay together anymore because they watch television where it’s nothing but sex and Hollywood type characters, which they just lust after and that’s why they’re on there of course. So it doesn’t really work in reality; reality’s not like that. I mean, Hollywood is a fantasy, folks, but most folk today can’t tell that; it just makes them dissatisfied with who they’re living with. So all these warfare techniques have worked very, very well. So most of them didn’t have children or one at the most, and of course, by the time you’re dead you’ve halved the population if everyone followed suit. And they have all these stats down, as I say, if you go into the United Nations Department of Population. So they want to now tax you so that they can get up another department, for the Department of Statistics, dedicated to see who’s dying and keep an accurate death toll. It says...)
Crucially, it would mean the family of the deceased having to stump of £170 for all non-coroner related deaths before the person is allowed to be buried.
Nothing in life is certain but death and taxes, but the government is making sure you will not only be certain of death but of paying extra tax when you go - and before you're settled in the ground or urn.
What happens if the family refuse to pay? Would you continue to be stuck in the freezer, like an abandoned car, sucking down expensive state-funded electricity? There could be quite a stack of bodies.
Funerals are already expensive enough (A: They’re like lawyers, in the medical industry, and pharma; they’re guaranteed massive payments from insurance and so on – it doesn’t matter if they win or lose. You can’t lose as an undertaker.): funeral directors' fee; pallbearers, hearse, flowers, fee for the minister, a headstone possibly and its upkeep, plus all the council permissions (A: I mean, it’s so crazy, the system we live in now, permits for everything.) - a line of outstretched hands.
But now there's another one, direct from the government, and before the family can say goodbye. For those who can remember back to last year, the Tories (A: Conservatives.) got very animated about Labour's plans for a £20k "death tax" to fund national carers. But £175 is a bit less than £20k.
Next, prepare to pay tax on a birth certificate, so you can be taxed both ends. (A: It’s interesting, you see, once again this is a legality. Your birth certificate really is ownership. If you register anything to the government you can have the use of it for a while, but it’s not yours. It doesn’t matter what you register, a car or whatever, and the same with your child. And then they can tax you, you see, because you’re giving property and ownership to that entity, the government, this private corporation. You’re giving a life over to them, and they can do what they want then, fill you full of inoculations, make you a moron, and make you incapable of ever waking up and saying, hey, this is all wrong.) Taxed as soon as you draw breath, and taxed once breath goes. Only a matter of time.
And folk of course will go along with it because they go along with everything, as they get robbed blind by this entity called government, that calls themselves public servants, you know, public servants. Not bad being a servant when you’ve got more cash rolling in than any of the people, any of your supposed masters. It’s such a farcical joke. But people go along with it. People go along with it, don’t they? And there’s no end to it, you understand. There’s no end. So here they are because they want to ensure they reach their target quotas of death and live births, you’re going to pay extra cash. Yeah, like they don’t have enough cash rolling in already. They’re lending cash out across the world like a bank. And who gave them permission to do that? Well, as a private corporation they can do whatever they want. That’s what. And then they give the money out, redistribution of wealth they call it, right from the Communist planks, the Manifesto, but they’re really giving it to big corporations in third world countries.
Now, we know that there’s a lot of the ongoing October revolution right now – they love October for revolutions – and the Wall Street protests that’s going on across the country in the US; it may be spreading into Canada eventually. And there’s lots of people that’s just ticked right off with this. And it is so true, isn’t it? I mean, what court... Supposing we had a real justice system, which we don’t of course; we have a system that serves the system. And these characters plunder you twice a century, minimum, and then they get rewarded by your tax money to float them again, so they can do it once again. Back in a moment after this break with more on this particular story.
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix and I was just mentioning about, yeah, there’s an awful lot of folk who are just completely ticked off with the constant plundering of incredibly rich banks who give billion dollar bonuses to top dogs, of course, every year, right after they got the bailouts too. They were right at again, same old thing, and still scamming the public left, right and center. And yet the establishment is firmly behind the ones who are in power in the banking system to make sure they keep going. So really, as far as they’re concerned, America is just a list of corporate banks at the top, the big, big boys at the top. That’s all America is to them. And we’re just there for their use of, of course.
So people are really demonstrating all over. You got a lot of left-wing out unfortunately, I mean the hard radical Marxist groups, which were prophesied back in 2007 from the military, the Ministry of Defence’s think tank report, that that would happen with their flash mobs, etc. So they knew all this was coming before it all happened, before they even said okay we’re broke, you know we’re bust. It was all figured out in advance because they keep their watch on everything that’s going on. And I really believe that all the big banks at the top, you know, planned all this. They knew they were creating nothing but bubbles. They were passing all these houses and mortgages around like crazy until they couldn’t even find who originally owned it. But each time they would sell it to the next character they’d double and triple the price and say, this is a great deal, etc. It was all utterly criminal really, and they got off with it because the government won’t touch them. Because you see, that is the establishment. That is the establishment.
So anyway, lots of folk are ticked off and of course unfortunately a lot of the left-left Marxists also want to bring in this new system which Rockefeller and all the big boys at the top want to bring in as well. Isn’t that amazing? You know, the new system with a new way of living and austerity. They were talking about austerity long before the bank crash, believe you me, planning at the United Nations and for the 21st century. It’s part of Agenda 21. And here they go with it. So unfortunately a lot of them who are protesting will get boondoggled again by fancy words, lots of promises and they’ll end up into this new, even more restricted totalitarian system, all dumped into the slum cities until we’re living on top of each other, because that is the agenda for the bulk of the populace, for the whole 21st century. And eventually only those who are in very high positions will be able to afford to live on the land, because basically they’ll serve the world system and they’ll be on top of the national school boards, all of these things. The only ones who can afford all the permits, and a lot of them will be just, you know, waved right through without the permits in fact. You won’t be able to get on the land, and that’s already been discussed as well. As far back as Julian Huxley when he was head of the United Nations UNESCO, he said the same thing. He said, that will be a problem down the road, and this is in the 1950s, he says, should we leave any in the country at all, or how do we get them off. He says, well, I’ll have to think about that. Well, what they mean by thinking about it, is that the average person who is non-essential to the state or the world system will be unable to live, and not allowed to live, in the country. That’s what they want. They want everyone under the watchful eyes of CCTV cameras and in the cities where they can be readily reached and disposed of if necessary.
Washington protest: American Spectator condemned over article
Patrick Howley claimed he infiltrated Saturday's DC protest in order to discredit it – but account has since been altered
guardian.co.uk / Karen McVeigh / 10 October 2011
Saturday's march was organised by the October 11 group, which protests against America's use of unmanned drones overseas. (A: That was one of them.)
A conservative US news magazine has come under fire after one of its journalists boasted of being an agent provocateur at a clash between protesters and security guards in Washington.
The incident, in which guards used pepper spray on protesters trying to enter the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum, was widely reported to be linked to the Occupy Wall Street protests.
Patrick Howley, an assistant editor at the American Spectator, wrote over the weekend that he had infiltrated the protest group in order to discredit it. He said: "As far as anyone knew I was part of this cause — a cause that I had infiltrated the day before in order to mock and undermine in the pages of the American Spectator — and I wasn't giving up before I had my story."
However, Howley's breathless account of his role as provocateur – which goes on to condemn the protesters' "lack of nerve to confront authority", and his own determination to escalate the protest further as he rushed past security guards into the museum – has since been altered. The magazine appears to have taken down the story, although it has been reported in the Washington Post and on the Firedoglake and Daily Kos blogs. (A: The links are all here to see what he originally had written.)
Removed from the new story is any mention of Howley's motive to "mock and undermine" the protesters, or his disdain for their "lack of nerve". Instead, he says his involvement was intended for journalistic purposes, and that he rushed inside the museum "to find a place to observe."
Charlie Grapski, a citizen journalist and activist, accused the American Spectator and Howley of breaching journalistic integrity, and of criminal acts – and called for them to be investigated and charged. (A: Well you know, an awful lot of journalists are also associated with the CIA; that’s been well disclosed from the top themselves over the years. And lots of university professors are as well. The same in Canada with the CSIS.)
Grapski said: "It is not journalism. This goes against every tenet of ethical journalism. Howley was doing it in order to 'mock and undermine'. His actions shows that the protesters were not out to disrupt, but that chaos and disruption followed his actions. Not only has he distorted the story to discredit others, he has engaged in criminal acts." (A: But he’ll get off with it because he’ll be one of their boys. So whenever you’re in a big, big crowd of course, you expect the provocateurs; they’ve been caught so many times. The police send them in, dressed as YOU; you’ll often see them because they have their hair shaved like skinheads and they all wear the same boots. And they try to get things really going. They can even hire them. Today there’s professional provocateurs you hire in groups; they’re gangs of them. And you fly them in from other countries; they fly them around the world in fact. And governments employ them. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, beware of the groups that you want to be involved in because you’ll often be used for a completely opposite – it’s very Orwellian – purpose than you actually think you’re involved in. And there’s so many radical, far, far left ones there that want to bring in the same system, if you really look at the system they want to bring in, of total control over everyone’s lives and the planned society. It’s exactly the same as the so-called far, far right or the ones who run the world. In other words, the bankers do, and that’s the way it’s all planned for the future.
VeriSign demands website takedown powers
No court order necessary
theregister.co.uk / Kevin Murphy / 11th October 2011
VeriSign, which manages the database of all .com internet addresses, wants powers to shut down "non-legitimate" domain names when asked to by law enforcement.
The company said today it wants to be able to enforce the "denial, cancellation or transfer of any registration" in any of a laundry list of scenarios where a domain is deemed to be "abusive". (A: Now, that can be stretched to any dimension by lawyers, as you well know. Any term can... ‘abusive.’ Or someone can say I’m offended... oh, I was offended by that site, pull it and that’s it.)
VeriSign should be able to shut down a .com or .net domain, and therefore its associated website and email, "to comply with any applicable court orders, laws, government rules or requirements, requests of law enforcement or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency (A: All these private ones that work now for government.), or any dispute resolution process", according to a document it filed today with domain name industry overseer ICANN.
The company has already helped law enforcement agencies in the US, such as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, seize domains that were allegedly being used to sell counterfeit goods or facilitate online piracy, when the agency first obtained a court order. (A: They always give you the worst scenario, but they know it’s not for that at all. You know where it’s all going to go.)
That seizure process has come under fire because, in at least one fringe case, a seized .com domain's website had already been ruled legal by a court in its native Spain.
Senior ICE agents (A: They love all these names. It’s like Spectre from James Bond and stuff; they just love this stuff.) are on record saying that they believe all .com addresses fall under US jurisdiction.
But the new powers would be international and, according to VeriSign's filing, could enable it to shut down a domain also when it receives "requests from law enforcement", without a court order. (A: ...without a court order.)
"Various law enforcement personnel, around the globe, have asked us to mitigate domain name abuse, and have validated our approach to rapid suspension of malicious domain names," VeriSign told ICANN, describing its system as "an integrated response to criminal activities that utilize Verisign-managed [top-level domains] and DNS infrastructure". (A: So they’re trying to say it’s malicious domain names and criminal... I think they should do government ones, all the .gov/.com ones, because you’ll never get anything more criminal than that, believe you me, and piracy.)
The company said it has already cooperated with US law enforcement, including the FBI, to craft the suspension policies, and that it intends to also work with police in Europe and elsewhere.
It's not yet clear how VeriSign would handle a request to suspend a .com domain that was hosting content legal in the US and Europe but illegal in, for example, Saudi Arabia or Uganda.
VeriSign made the request in a Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) document filed today with ICANN. The RSEP is currently the primary mechanism that registries employ when they want to make significant changes to their contracts with ICANN.
The request also separately asks for permission to launch a "malware scanning service", not dissimilar to the one recently introduced by ICM Registry, manager of the new .xxx extension.
That service would enable VeriSign to scan all .com websites once per quarter for malware and then provide a free "informational only" security report to the registrar responsible for the domain, which would then be able to take re-mediation action. It would be a voluntary service. (A: Mind you, if they say they found it on your site even if they can’t prove it, I guess that’ll give them a reason to pull it, you see.)
RSEP requires all registries including VeriSign to submit to a technical and competition evaluation.
And it goes on on a little bit more but basically you’re seeing... It’s actually in the Department of Defence’s report for the next 50 years, this, how they’re going to go on and unify all the basic stuff to do with all communication, because they foresee terrorism in everything. In fact, in the latest Military Defence report one, think tank for the UK and the US and NATO military, they actually say that, that the difference between who’s an actual terrorist and people who are not really terrorists but could be radicalized, even individually, will expand the meaning of terrorism to do with communications, etc, etc. So this is all planned and this is part of it too. And plus they want a unifying, one agency across the world to dominate, overseeing all of the internet. They’re pushing for this global system of amalgamation.
Now, here’s a part of it here in fact...
UK official sees cyber, security consolidation
uk.reuters.com / Oct 11 2011 / Andrea Shalal-Esa
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The global security market will likely see increasing mergers and acquisitions in coming years, given the large number of firms and buyers in the sector, and the intensity of the threat, a top U.K. official said on Monday.
"The opportunities for consolidation in security are much more obvious than they are in defence," Richard Paniguian, who oversees defence and security exports for the British trade and investment office, told Reuters in an interview at the annual conference of the Association of the U.S. Army.
The defence sector consolidated heavily after the end of the Cold War, but many new companies have sprung up after the September 11, 2001 hijacking attacks to deal with growing threats to government and corporate computer networks and physical infrastructure.
"In the world of security, where the threats are enormous, in order to surmount these threats, there needs to be a kind of consolidation of both the industry and most importantly, the purchasing power," Paniguian said.
Defence industry executives and analysts expect a new wave of consolidation among second- and third-tier companies in the global weapons-making business. They believe that companies specializing in cybersecurity are a particularly attractive target.
Paniguian said the sheer scale of the challenges of protecting corporate, government and military computer networks from a vast array of threats underscored the need for better coordination within individual countries, and among them.
So they want to consolidate it all. And it’s strange, this all came out right after the latest Department of Defence think tank study for the next 50 years that was just released there. So they go right into it, on board with it, and get the ideas out to our little minds, bit by bit by bit until they bring it in and we’re all kind of ready for it when they bring it in. That’s how they train us for what’s to come, by predictive programming.
Now, we’re so politically correct now, because see, the whole world’s in many transitions, as they erase borders in many countries and allow the free flow of goods and services AND labor, into countries, and everything I’m about to read now was put out by Department of Defence think tanks 20 years ago, some 30 years ago, but here it’s in the paper now. Actually, back in the days of John Dewey, he mentioned this too. It says...
French history erased in new wave of revisionism
eutimes.net / Posted by EU Times / Oct 3rd, 2011
France, Marseille: Parents and teachers across France are up in arms over new textbooks which carry accounts of French history revised to avoid insulting ethnic minority pupils. They say common sense has been sacrificed to political correctness in French schools.
Natives of France now fear their identity will soon disappear along with their history.
A modern French history textbook now boasts no less than 20 pages on the history of black slavery while devoting a mere six pages to the achievements of Napoleon – shown here sitting on a toilet. (A: ...in this children’s textbook.)
France’s new history textbooks are enraging parents and teachers who call it political correctness gone mad.
Dimitri Casali, history professor and best-selling author on the newly-banished giants of France warns of dire consequences of the new educational policy.
“If we don’t teach our minorities the history of their adopted country, they won’t feel French. We’re already seeing riots on our streets,” (A: They have been for years in France, actually.) Casali exclaims. (A: And that is true. If they don’t... And even the Department of Defence says this too, they’re in a quandary because on the one hand they know that if you don’t bring in immigrants and make them feel part of the country, until it is their country, and they adapt the dominant culture already established, then they’ll keep their own and then they will become radicalized down the road and they’ll have riots. You see. So we’re seeing the stage set for the riots actually, and they’ve been doing that for years. So as he says...
“We’re already seeing riots on our streets,” Casali exclaims.
In the new textbook, the Crusades are now called insulting to Muslims, the Sun King Louis 14th is labeled imperialist (A: It’s all communist written, you see.) and Napoleon is mocked as the Colonel Gaddafi of his day. The star of the new school books is Mali’s previously little-known King Kankou Musa who ruled over the West African country in the 13th century.
The purge even extends to literary giants like Victor Hugo, author of the world classic, Les Miserables.
France is already breaking up, believes Professor Casali, because its young people have no sense of identity. Parents are deeply concerned too.
Father-of-three Jean-Noel Villemin from Paris says, “We need to study even the worst pages of our history because you cannot understand politics today if you don’t understand history (A: And it’s so vitally true. You got to KNOW the big changes you went through in history and why.), if they want to understand and vote properly.” (A: Well, they always vote for the same system.)
Legal action is seen as the only way to stop the erasure of France’s national history.
“Schools now give 10 per cent of their schedule to the medieval African Mali Empire. I’ve studied it, and what exactly is its contribution to world development?” asks Parisian lawyer Marcel Ceccaldi.
Thousands signed a petition after lessons on the French Revolution were replaced by study of the African kingdom of Monomotapah, which many say they have never heard of. The Ministry of Education refused to be interviewed, but gave RT this statement:
“We are changing the school curriculum to reflect globalization. Monomotapah is being taught because it is important to have a view on other world cultures such as Egypt, China and India,” the statement reads.
A new European Parliament report has backed compulsory school lessons on the benefits of the European Union (A: That’s this new sovietized parliament.), from “a very young age.” Critics say pupils are learning less and less about their own countries and warn that states which stop teaching their past will simply consign themselves to history.
Now, it ties in with John Dewey an awful long time ago, because John Dewey was set up to bring down the American educational system. He belonged to the different far left causes and he was trained in Germany to bring this system over to America. And he said in his books if you read them for yourself, he said that eventually we’d have this multicultural world as we amalgamate the whole world into one system, and he said, we shall teach, eventually we’ll phase out pretty well all history where there’s any conflict at all. It will just disappear from the history books like Orwell’s memory hole. So that was the plan and you’re seeing it in action many, many, many, many decades later. So nothing happens by chance. It’s all planned that way. The whole world order is always planned in advance by those who control it at the time. You know, he who controls the past controls the future, you see. So nothing happens by chance, as I say.
Now, there’s another article I’ll put up too...
Michigan: Police Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops
ACLU seeks information on Michigan program that allows cops to download information from smart phones belonging to stopped motorists.
thenewspaper.com / 4/19/2011
The Michigan State Police have a high-tech mobile forensics device that can be used to extract information from cell phones belonging to motorists stopped for minor traffic violations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan last Wednesday demanded that state officials stop stonewalling freedom of information requests for information on the program.
ACLU learned that the police had acquired the cell phone scanning devices and in August 2008 filed an official request for records on the program, including logs of how the devices were used. The state police responded by saying they would provide the information only in return (A: Listen to this... They would provide to the ACLU the information of what they were up to ONLY in return...) for a payment of $544,680. The ACLU found the charge outrageous.
"Law enforcement officers are known, on occasion, to encourage citizens to cooperate if they have nothing to hide," (A: Oh, if you have nothing to hide you’ll let us go through everything, and x-ray you and poke you and look up your orifices. I mean, that’s what it’s come down to folks and you’re all letting it happen. That’s how you consent to it. And when you consent to it you create a legality; you’re helping it become a monstrous legality.) ACLU staff attorney Mark P. Fancher wrote. "No less should be expected of law enforcement, and the Michigan State Police should be willing to assuage concerns that these powerful extraction devices are being used illegally by honoring our requests for cooperation and disclosure."
A US Department of Justice test of the CelleBrite UFED used by Michigan police found the device could grab all of the photos and video off of an iPhone within one-and-a-half minutes. The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.
"Complete extraction of existing, hidden, and deleted phone data (A: ...all your deleted phone data... it’s all there too. It’s all stored, you see.), including call history, text messages, contacts, images, and geotags," a CelleBrite brochure explains regarding the device's capabilities. "The Physical Analyzer allows visualization of both existing and deleted locations on Google Earth. In addition, location information from GPS devices and image geotags can be mapped on Google Maps."
The ACLU is concerned that these powerful capabilities are being quietly used to bypass Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.
You should never have gone and allowed even the name ‘law enforcement officers.’ They used to be called ‘police’ at one time, and they were public servants. And they used to call people sir and madam, etc, because they knew that YOU were their paymaster. You still are their paymaster, but how through conditioning they can get the people to get dumbed down and stupid through all the propaganda movies. It’s all movies, drama, all propaganda that you see on television. And look at the ones now; you can’t watch a movie without them battering down doors, all dressed in black, until when it happens to people they say, it’s just like the movies. Well sure it’s like the movies because the cops wanted to be like the movie stars. Now they get their chance. Ah dear, dear, it’s gone way too far, way too far. I tell you one thing, it’s doesn’t bode good for the future because the more powerful and the more longevity a system like that has in that kind of form, they will not go down quietly. They will not give up at all. Believe you me, they’ll get more ferocious and more aggressive.
Now, getting back to what I said before, that politicians can’t think for themselves, they don’t expect to anymore.
Meet the PC oligarchy that now rules Britain
spiked-online.com / 6 October 2011 / Brendan O’Neill
(A: Now, this is a good article because it’s the same across the world now, including the States.)
You couldn’t have asked for a better snapshot of the unbridgeable chasm that now separates politicians from the public than the Tory Party conference. This weird, media-oriented, stage-managed display of pragmatism and bluster confirmed that politics has become completely disassociated from ordinary people’s lives and concerns. The conference showed that the political class and the only other section of society that has any interest in what it thinks and says – the media – are now so insulated from the madding crowd that they not only think in a different way and have different outlooks on life, but seem to speak in a different language entirely. The rarefication of British politics is complete.
The most striking thing about the Conservative Party conference was the extent to which its agenda was determined by what is not happening in the real world rather than what is. Surreally, this was a supposedly political gathering at which the big issues of the day – from the economy to the future of Europe – were either skirted around or given the deeply unconvincing Cameron-as-plucky-bulldog treatment, while issues that have no traction whatsoever amongst the public – from sexist language to gay marriage (A: These are the topics they pick, you see, these things.) – were put centre stage by both Tory spokespeople and political reporters. (A: They’re all run now, you see, by think tanks and experts that tell them what the topics will be – they’re useless, in other words, as leaders. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and I’ve just got time for a call. I’ll take Mark from Texas. Are you there Mark?
Mark: Sure am, Alan. You know, the phrase that I hate the most is that phrase public/private partnership, because I don’t think it really, truly describes the association. It’s public corporations and private corporations partnerships. You with me? Now, here’s what I’m seeing with this association that’s being developed. It’s going to continue to morph and they’re going to continue, Alan, to transfer taxing, not authority but taxing collections from the public corporation to the private. They’re going to continue to move all taxing collections to the private corporation. In other words, they’re going to place it with your electric bill, with your water bill, with stuff that’s essential. And by the way, there’s a good possibility, I can’t prove this, I’m still working on this one. But Alan, there’s a good possibility they could put a lien on your house if you don’t pay your electric bill, once.
Alan: Actually, they’re doing that in Greece. That was one of the solutions they came up with in Greece.
Mark: Oh you’re kidding?
Alan: No. They’re actually doing that. There was a book written back in the 30s, in techniques and techtronics, and it was to do with this very system where taxing folk on energy will be done by private corporations in the future. And the public/private partnerships go into a form of feudalism; Quigley verified that too, all private corporations. And in Greece, I read the article about a week ago, it’s on my archives section at the web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com, where they’ve actually, the government had put through the payments for all these taxes that they’re owing, via their electric bills, through a private corporation, and if you don’t pay them they come in and cut off your electricity. But the next step is to take your house over.
Mark: Well, and they’re actually trying to push it. If you look at their phrasing now on all the political talk, it’s all, oh we need less taxes, less taxes. We’re not going to have less taxes, Alan. They’re just going to throw it to the private side.
Alan: The private side and as you say, they’ll tax it on energy, because that was the whole focus of this new system that takes over, along with money, it’s also energy consumption, and that will be a form of taxing you even more for energy. And you’re already doing it, actually, under the carbon taxes, and once the Value Added Tax kicks in in the US, which is definitely going to happen, all the rest of the world’s got it, and it started off from the CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the whole VAT idea. You’re going to find that you’re paying for even the wrapper that that candy bar was made, how much energy it took to make that candy bar, how much carbon it created during that. And it’s all taxed on top of your candy bar, and anything else you buy as well is taxed the same way.
Mark: Well, I’m just even thinking, though, with essentials for living in a house, you know, not just with electricity, you have your natural gas, you know you have your heating oil. There’s lots of ways they could do this and not even really, even, you know, put it underneath the circle of carbon. They could just do the essentials.
Alan: Oh, absolutely.
Mark: They just nail you that way.
Alan: That’s where it’s to go. All energy consumption, and that’s what this other group eventually, along with the big top bankers that are still working today, back in the 1930s said, eventually we can actually use energy ITSELF as a form of currency. And that’s also where your carbon credits come in and all this kind of stuff. But taxing you right down, yeah.
Mark: It’s amazing when you try and think like a crook and somebody beats you to it.
Alan: That’s it. [Alan laughing.]
Mark: [Caller laughing.] Thanks, Alan.
Alan: Well, the best crooks have already done it. That’s just it.
Mark: Yeah! I’m just a little late on being a crook.
Mark: God bless you, brother.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Mark: Bye now.
Alan: From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada – and remember, buy the books and discs, or donate, and keep me going, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com – it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Gov. to Introduce Death Tax to "Help Fund Better
Provocateurs in Amongst Washington Protest
Verisign Demands Take-down Powers for Non-Legit. Domain Names
Cyber Security Private Gov Consolidation
French History Revised for Political Correctness in Global Society
Cell Phone Searches During Traffic Stops
Politicos Run by Marketers and Think Tanks