Aug. 9, 2011 (#893)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 9, 2011:

The Great Mire of London:

"Don't Think Authorities Bury Head in the Sand
As Burning and Looting Spread Through England,
The Looters, Unchecked, Each One a Dope,
Is Monitored, ID'd and Given Loose Rope,
Until Police State Moves in to Use New Toys
In This Experiment on Girls and Boys,
You Are in a Police State, Don't Be Confused,
They Want to Test Powers, Mobs are Used,
Those Watching, Being Programmed by TV,
Will Hear Big Brother say "See, You Need Me",
Authorities Give Authority to Themselves
And Buy More Pervasive Surveillance from Shelves,
See-- No One is Safe with Family, or Alone,
Big Brother Wants Cameras in Everyone's Home"
© Alan Watt Aug. 9, 2011

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 9, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 9th of August 2011.  For newcomers, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the hundreds of audios which are freely available there, where hopefully youíll get shortcuts to understanding this big system you live in and you were born into, your parents were born into it, a big system they know nothing about really, most of them.  Most people go to their graves never really understanding theyíve been manipulated and lied to and conned and prodded, and basically prompted along their lives to think that things are just happening in their lifetime, out of the blue, things just happen out of the blue.† And they never stop to think that if so many thousands of experts in every country are dealing, on every single topic imaginable, that these things cannot be so unpredictable after all. 

 

Youíre living through a planned society, a planned change into this new system.  And of course, like all new systems you canít make an omelet without breaking eggs and thatís why you have riots and chaos and all the rest of it, all planned that way and Iíll show you later tonight how that was done in fact, some of it, and how they generally tell you, long in advance, as to what they want to do at the top.  The global society, itís not going to be some big happy family all just purchasing big television sets.  Itís going to be a very eugenically driven society to get the survival of the fittest while all the rest are simply killed off or allowed to die.  The hardest thing to do in this society is to hold on to your sanity as you go through these massive changes.  As I say, nothing happens in a big way without it being planned that way. 

 

And while youíre at it, remember, buy the books and disks Iíve got for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  Theyíre different from other books and I hope to give you little insights into how weíve been managed in the past, even from ancient times, through language and the use of words and images.  Images are awfully important symbols.  And how literally weíre programmed from early childhood to go along with a system where a few at the top benefit and the rest donít.  Itís that simply really.  Only today theyíre using much higher technologies and weíve read about some of them on this particular broadcast.  So buy the books and the disks.† [Order and donation options listed above.]  And straight donations are certainly welcome as well, as we watch this nonsense of inflation go across the world, thatís planned of course. 

 

And it wonít touch the big money boys because they were the guys that planned it all, and they will reap the rewards; thatís all the cash and all the real estate that they collect when you all go under.  Thatís how itís done.  Youíre plundered generally twice a century and thatís why the banking system is never totally overhauled and new regulations put in place and nobody swings for it, basically, after theyíve plundered whole countries.  Itís set up that way because they want it that way.  whoever controls the money controls the nations and thatís what Rothschild said himself.  Every Prime Minister and President goes to their borrowing facility with cap in hand and borrows the cash instead of making their own.  Thatís what youíre up against, clever men.  The problem with the people outside this little circle who run it is that theyíre bribable at the top.  Thereís always psychopaths who are very bribable who become Prime Ministers and Presidents and keep the con going and help to loot you. They get well rewarded themselves mind you, like Tony Blair for instance.  They make all their money once they come out of politics; thatís their payoffs.  And we live in an awfully corrupt system.  Of course, from their angle and perspective theyíll tell you they actually deserve it, running the country and all, very difficult you know, flying in private jets and wining and dining and letting your underlings make all the decisions that the advisors around you actually made.  Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  It is hard for people to hold onto their sanity because they get swept up in the media nonsense as they divert your attention from one country to the next, to the next, to the next and have you going in circles.  So life becomes a kind of kaleidoscope with bits and pieces, or bytes of information just sinking into your head, and making no sense of it all because theyíre unrelated to other bits and pieces.  Thatís really how youíre controlled because the ones at the top are very cool, calm and collected and they know exactly where the world is supposed to go.  Hard to imagine for most folk. 

 

See, youíre already under a global society; you have been for a long time.  Theyíve had international organizations and think tanks working for well over 100 years now.  They plan the future and they plan that they will always be there in the future.  And a long time ago they brought academia on board to work for the bankers, with think tanks, etc, and grants to their universities, to work on ways to manage the mob Ė thatís everybody else Ė as we go through all these big drastic changes.  Part of it too, was to destroy nationalism.  And of course, during World War II we know they had meetings especially held in the US to do with the destruction of the nation-state. They said it was the worst possible thing they could have, after Germany.  I guess it was okay to be Russian because technically that was an empire that was constantly expanding, mind you most of them were communist anyway and still are to an extent at the very top, because they used communism or socialism to bring in their world state.  Itís against nationalism, you see. 

 

So the idea was that eventually the borders would go.  Theyíd have free trade and the free transport of goods and labor.  What they really meant by that was bringing in the excess surplus populations across the world, of diverse countries, into countries that were already full up basically, and creating the tensions and the chaos when no work would be found.  Thatís partly why the riots are going on in Britain right now because theyíve never intended to give the people work there.  The work today, all manufacturing, almost all manufacturing is made now in China, and that was also the plan, and we were all to be service economies.  Which is nonsense, itís a nonsensical idea.  Even when they floated that idea first in Britain, before they gave all their factories away in the 70s, then they said, it would never, ever work.  It was not meant to work for very long, put it that way.  Then the US adopted the same stance as they signed the World Trade Organization along with Canada and other countries, and then sent their factories abroad, again tax funded for the moving and all the rest of it.  Awfully nice of us to do that. 

 

This is what they call democracy.  Itís astonishing, really, that people still go and bother to vote at all, isnít it?  I mean, it really surprises me they go off, after living their lives and watching this sort of stuff happen and still go and vote for democracy. And they get these fresh faces all waxed to vote for, and the agenda goes on regardless of which party claims to be in power.  Because you see, theyíve already signed all the treaties and update them yearly from the United Nations and it doesnít matter which oneís in, they always carry it on.  Even Jefferson talked about that.  He said, when you see agendas, the same agendas, continue between changes in the House Ė thatís parties Ė he says, know then that youíre under tyranny.  And weíve been under it for an awful long time.  Thatís just the facts of it. 

 

The craziest thing too, was to create this European Union.  That was, again, a mandate made during World War II, part of the Lend-Lease Program, according to Eisenhower and others, was to make sure that the nations were integrated into a unified Europe.  People donít realize thatís what really started it.  And that was part of the deals that they signed on and they set up in 1948, all the offices across the countries involved, to integrate them on the sly, as they say Ė very quietly that is Ė and always to lie to the public until it was up and running.  And thatís exactly what they did.  And everyone unfortunately is supposed to fit into this round hole, all the square pegs, regardless of what country you come from or what nature of the people you live with, because weíre all different.  And they refuse to accept that.  Weíre all supposed to fit into the same round hole basically if weíre all square pegs.  Anyway, thatís the world we truly live in.

 

Thatís why youíre going through the planned depression now. And it combines with austerity.  Now, under their own laws, if you ever followed them before they mentioned the word austerity, you would think that their plan was to get you back up and running in manufacturing and creating jobs, etc.  But no.  Weíre told no.  Weíre supposed to, since the bank crashes, weíre supposed to be austere, eat less and buy less, and be quite happy that theyíre going to take all your spending money off you to pay high energy taxes, high fees, for everything, and that will take care of all that excess cash you had in your pocket.  Thatís whatís happening now. 

 

Whatís even crazier is when you watch one country after another in Europe go around this circle of bailing each other out, and itís all tax money you know, from countries that are already supposedly bankrupt, into a black hole, that they say we donít know if the money is going to eventually plug this hole or not.  So they keep throwing more billions at it.  Itís an absolute con.  What a con!  We live through one incredibly large con after another, and people are taught, by straight faces on television, that this is serious stuff and experts are managing the whole darn thing.  Isnít that amazing?  I think our IQ must have really dropped over the years for us to accept such rubbish, coming from mainstream media, with their experts.  If they were such experts none of it obviously would have happened in the first place.  And apart from that, if Greece had failed on its own, let the banks crash.  OR, let them fiddle their books like every other country fiddles its books to make it look glowing and wonderful.  They can keep the same cons going forever if they want to, in a positive way rather than a negative way.  ALL the books are rigged.  Money itself is rigged.  Itís all a con.

 

Anyway, here we go with the US and it says that theyíve downgraded the US for its purchasing power and so on, which means youíre going to buy at higher interest now.  And the same bankers you bailed out, by the way, will now be getting even more interest off you.  Fannie Mae, by the way, also had its hand out the other day there for another $5.1 billion dollars. 

 

Fannie Mae seeks $5.1 billion more from taxpayers - rawstory.com / Reuters / August 5th, 2011

 

Theyíre still getting bailed out, all these banks.  Anyway, it says...

 

Downgrade Ignites a Global Selloff

Dow's 634.76-Point Plunge Is Worst Since '08 as Worries Rise About U.S. Economy

wsj.com / E.S. BROWNING

 

The downgrade of the U.S.'s credit rating sparked a global selloff on Monday, pushing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to its sharpest one-day decline since the financial crisis in 2008.

 

In scenes reminiscent of three years ago, selling accelerated as the day went on, and investors were forced to sell to meet margin calls from lenders demanding more collateral.  (Alan:  Itís such a magic trick, isnít it?  You ever watched the guys with the cups and they put the dice in one and then they move them back and forth all fast and say, where is it then, where is it then, and you get a little prize if you guess right? Well, this is what itís like, isnít it?)

 

Theyíre either bailing out other countries or they go down themselves in the process and it makes no sense at all.  If you were truly that broke you wouldnít be giving a CENT out of the country to any other country, never mind building hospitals in China because you signed a deal way back when you did the WTO trade deal.  You would not be building up India to be an up-and-coming country with your tax money, but you are.  And all of this kind of stuff.  So itís just incredible we have to go through this farce, and thatís what it is.  Itís a farce which will really hurt people, as we all get trained to be austere and to basically get pent-up frustrations until they have the BIG riots, the REAL BIG riots which are scheduled to come down the pike.  Not the little looting ones in London right now and across England; thatís just youngsters whoíve watched enough advertising on TV saying, donít you want this big flat TV screen, and theyíre going shopping.  Thatís what that is right now, because obviously they canít afford it, but theyíre told theyíre supposed to have it according to the lifestyles on the ads on television. 

 

However, this is the farce that weíre told is reality.  And theyíve got no ends of experts to come out and tell us why we must keep throwing money at other countries, hoping to shore up or plug the hole, the big black hole in space, to stop the money flowing through.  Itís almost like congealing it, eh?  Like just putting lots of corks in there and hoping they all congeal together with some jelly and it stops just disappearing into the big black hole.  What a farce!  And they call this economics.  And the guys get, you know, they get big letters behind their names for being economists.  What a joke!  What a joke, isnít it?  Youíre better with somebody with a crystal ball; itís cheaper too to keep them.

 

Anyway, thatís the US, theyíve been downgraded, etc, etc, so the US has to get used to borrowing money, at a much bigger interest rate, and to get used to being austere, which means donít eat as much, donít buy as much, and be prepared to pay 10 times as much for energy. Because you see, energy and taxes is where your pocket money is to go now.  Thatís what they mean by austerity.  Itís all planned that way.  And youíve still got wars to fight.  Youíve still got to finish off, take out Iran eventually, and Syria; Israel is pushing for Syria too I noticed.  And finish off all those jobs.  And pay for it all.  And then you turn back in on yourselves, because thatís what you have to do.  All this weaponry and all the technology thatís experimented with abroad will be used back home over a span of 30 years Ė and Iíll get into that later Ė as they take the populations down. 

 

Now, Al Gore, the allegory himself, is quite the character because he was raised by Armand Hammer really.  And Armand Hammer was given the name Armand Hammer from his daddy who came into America early on, practiced back-street abortions when he wasnít qualified, sold a lot of very dodgy mixtures for cough syrups, etc, but eventually he got his little boy in.  He named him after the arm and hammer of the Soviet flag basically.  Itís interesting too, Armand Hammer himself had an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin all through the Cold War.  And he could come back and forth, to the US and back, and be a very popular guy in both houses you might say, of government, and no one ever questioned his motives.  Itís quite interesting.  Anyway, Al Gore was all trained for this global system.  This global system of high-level communists doesnít mean they have to be poor, you understand.  It was never intended that high-level communists be poor. They truly believe in eugenics, more than youíd ever imagine.  They believe that the ones at the top should claim the wealth of the planet, as they order you on how to live for yourselves.  Anyway, Al Goreís admitting defeat up to a little bit on his global warming scam.  Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  Al Gore, as you know, was one of the first guys to be given the job to come forward, to make himself a lot of cash at the same time, by pushing global warming and then Ďclimate change.í  They changed it to climate change when the warming wasnít working out too well, and Britain and other countries were under snow for a good part of the year last year, and folk have forgotten that already.  Anyway, they changed it to climate change and he got really ticked off because people arenít taking him so seriously anymore.  And NASA and other ones have come out and said, well CO2 is following warming, it always does.  It doesnít cause or lead the global warming, it follows warming, because basically the sea absorbs CO2 at times and then it gives it off again when itís a bit warm.  So anyway, the facts donít matter when it comes to this.  And some of the top people have said that the facts donít matter; theyíre more interested in their computer models Ė theyíre living in a virtual reality.  Anyway it says...

 

Al Gore admits defeat

The end of the Great Global Warming Scam is just that much closer.

joannenova.com.au

 

(A:   This is from a speech he gave there and Iíll put the little audio up too if I can find it and you can listen to him actually say this for yourself.)

 

Al Gore admits defeat:

ďWhen you go and talk to any audience about climate, you hear them washing back at you the same (A:  He says CRAP... ooohhh....) crap over and over and over again,Ē he continued. ďThereís no longer a shared reality on an issue like climate even though the very existence of our civilization is threatened. (A:   Well, the existence of his special bank set up to deal with carbon credits is threatened thatís for sure.)  People have no idea! Ö Itís no longer acceptable in mixed company, meaning bipartisan company, to use the goddamn word (A:   ...he says... goddamn word too...) climate. It is not acceptable. They have polluted it to the point where we cannot possibly come to an agreement on it.Ē

(A:   So then he says too, because NASA came out and says volcanoes, etc, alter the climate, and sunspots too. And he says...)

 

Gore Unhinged! Loses it on skeptical claims: 'It may be volcanoes.' Bullshit! 'It may be sun spots.' Bullshit! 'It's not getting warmer.' Bullshit!' -- Climate Depot Responds!

Visit Site: Climate Depot's Point-By-Point Rebuttal to Gore's Highbrow Scientific Arguments

climatedepot.com / August 07, 2011/ Marc Morano  Ė  Climate Depot

 

(A:   He says Bullshit, to every one of them, the nasty man that he is.  This is a man who talks to children in schools, you know, and brainwashes them, saying terrible things like that.  So Iíll put this link up tonight and you can hear yourself as the guy gets rather ticked off as the true fanatic that he is.  Mind you, theyíre all fanatical when it comes down to their own personal cash and heís already rich enough of course, all of the ones at the top are.† He wants, along with Rothschild, to put all our tax money, via an energy mathematical equation, into their own particular banks, where they can reap incredible interest off it, even overnight.  The whole world goes through them, you see.  So this is Al Gore getting all nasty and nothing surprises me.)

 

Now, Iíve talked about the degradation of society; it falls into the riots in Britain.  It falls into the riots that will come everywhere else, thatís scheduled to come by the way.  Itís not just a matter of people saying Iíve had enough and somebody going crazy.  It literally is scheduled that way.  Weíre living in police states across the world, all since 9/11, and that was all part of it, getting ready to contain a post-consumerist society with massive inflation coming, thought out a long time ago by the big think tanks.  Again, because you now have the destruction of the family unit; itís gone basically, the old traditional families.  Thereís very few dads anymore who have any say in the matter, the ones who still exist, and of course, the youngsters join gangs, etc.  And then when the economy goes belly up as always, it does once in a while, they go shopping through store windows and through the glass panes as well.  Anyway, weíre seeing that in Britain.  Iíll put up quite a few links up to the British ones. 

 

Riots claim first life: Man, 26, dies in hospital after being shot while sitting in car in London - dailymail.co.uk / 9th August 2011

Do you know these looting suspects? Police release just TWELVE pictures (but we've found 40 more to be going on with) - dailymail.co.uk / 10th August 2011

London Riots: Government Prepares Troops, Martial Law Imminent - youtube.com

Fightback! London's looters stay home as 16,000 police flood the streets ready to use plastic bullets - dailymail.co.uk / 10th August 2011

So where WERE the police? Shopkeepers mystified at tactics that left them defenceless - dailymail.co.uk / 9th August 2011

Further riots in London as violence spreads across England - bbc.co.uk / 9 August 2011

On the street with Manchester's masked youths - bbc.co.uk / 9 August 2011

 

And they claimed it started off... it doesnít matter how it started off because a special SWAT team, a British team called Trident who deal with firearms, shot a guy, a youngster, and they claim thatís what started it off.  Another claim is that the cops beat up a 16-year-old girl.  It doesnít matter, as I say, what started it off.  The fact is, it was shopping time and people had had enough as theyíre crammed into these cities with ever more increasing immigration coming in all the time, more and more and more.  And that ties in with what Tony Blair said to his chief of staff who came out on national television, as I read it here in fact, and said, we must bring in massive immigration of the most diverse types to totally destroy any semblance of British life forever.  That was in mainstream news; I have the articles here if anybody wants to question me on it.  That was from his assistant Prime Minister. 

 

So we watch degradation.  Weíve also watched degradation through music.  And children too, have been brought up with this awful rap stuff for years and years and years, copying even an ethnic group they canít even identify with; itís ridiculous.  Again, you know 50 years ago the boys who made the record industry what it is, said that they could actually make that happen. The first step, and it was all worked by the Frankfurt Institute too.  The first step was to get people from stopping dancing together, and holding each other.  Iím not kidding you; I know the whole history of this and how it was worked.  They came in with the pop music and then you danced separately from your partner, and kind of stared at your feet or maybe her knees or whatever.  That was to get it started, to change it from seeing the person to seeing nothing but sex.  And itís been awfully successful.  The end of the family unit, the State came in to take care of the fallout and now the State is your nanny.  And itís literally your nanny too; it brings your child up for you.  All planned a long time ago.

 

The next part too, was the total destruction of remaining religion; awfully successful there too.  The religions that are left are generally charismatic and a bit crazy.  Theyíre more political for other countriesí rights than they are about their own.  And you also go into the massive programming on television, even starting with the X Files where in every episode you get SWAT teams and then the main female in it is always chopping up bodies as a pastime to find out what killed them.  Then in came CSI and talk about stiffs and all the different names for what were once people, becoming normal.  Weíre being desensitized to everything and now weíre eating Chinaís new booster pills for stamina made out of dead babies.  Iíll get back on that after this break.

 

Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about the degradation of society, planned degradation by the way.  Youíll find guys like Aldous Huxley and then his brother Julian Huxley especially who was the first CEO of UNESCO, the United Nationsí wonderful standardization tool for children, talking about this particular phase of it that would come in the future, a time of fallout basically, as they destroyed the family unit and the fallout that would come from afterwards with it.  And how they would create an atheistic, almost anarchistic type society, so theyíd have to use the heavy hand to control them, and that would be done through, again, scientific indoctrination through school. Grabbing them at an early age, thatís what they hoped to do. 

 

Getting back to how weíre degraded, as I say, itís done through all television programming.   They always give you a little mystery and a murder and you follow the thing to the silly end, of the rotten story, and on the way youíre downloaded with predictive programming on, well, people cutting up corpses and, oh, weighing livers and, oh, itís just like a matter of fact sort of thing, nothing to do about humanity at all.  Weíre dehumanized, you see.  So we watch this kind of stuff.  Itís happened before in China, of course, they have a thing about keeping fit forever.  The BBC have done reports in the past where they actually bought aborted babies out of the back doors of abortion hospitals and they were given recipes on how to make soup and all kinds of delicious stuff like that from it, to enhance your youth, etc.  So here they are again and this is out of the International Business Times.  And the South Koreans are the ones who are pursuing this because now theyíre selling them in that country from China.  It says...

 

Chinaís New Lucrative Business:

Dead Babies Turn into Stamina Booster Pills

sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com / August 5, 2011

 

China, South Korea, Abortion:  The team reveals that the truth behind the dead baby pill is horrific and disturbing.

 

Chinese hospitals and abortion clinics that are connected to the business immediately notify pharmaceutical companies when a baby dies, mostly because of a still birth or an abortion.

 

The companies purchase the baby corpses and store them in some familyís refrigerator to avoid suspicion. The next step in this highly secretive process is putting the corpses in a medical drying microwave and grinding them into pills. The ground baby powder is then put in a capsule, ready to be sold as a stamina enhancer, according to the SBS team.

 

The Korean team acquired the dead baby capsules and ran DNA tests on it. The test results reportedly indicated the pills were 99.7 percent human. The test also found hair and nail remnants, and even the gender of the baby could be identified. The process will be aired with visuals in the SBS TV documentary on Aug. 6, 2011 in South Korea.

 

So, thatís how youíre dehumanized.  And itís in all your entertainment too now by the way.  And society is ready for the big heavy hand to be put upon it because we are not cohesive on any shared values whatsoever.  Thatís part of the process of getting society ready for the big hammer. 

 

Alan:  Actually, thereís a caller hanging on from the UK.  Itís Daniel; Iíll see if Daniel is still there.  Are you there Daniel?

 

Daniel:  Just quickly, about these riots in the UK, I was wondering what your opinion was because to me they sound very strange, they have kicked off in eight other cities simultaneously.† And it does seem very, very odd to me.  If there was a riot because this guy got killed, and I donít know if you know incidentally, but they have now confirmed that the bullet that hit the policeman was actually a police issue bullet.† So they think that a policeman shot another police, which doesnít surprise me. But anyway the point is, doesnít it sound a big strange that these riots have all of a sudden kicked off in eight other different cities up to 250 miles away?  What do you think itís all about?

 

Alan:  Well I can remember the last riots they had.  And the last riots were through the same cities actually.  And they were organized, by leaders.  The mob doesnít matter; the mob follows.  As I mentioned yesterday, it only takes 5% of those manipulating information to get 95% to follow. And so it can be very high up; who knows whoís handling it.  It could be MI5 for all we know.  What happened back in the last big riots, it culminated with jeeps going around the town with people, it was some black organizers actually, and some in from Africa who were communists, and they were directing the mobs where to go.  And that was not a spontaneous uprising either.  So this time itís the same kind of deal thatís happening.  Itís probably a test I would say for bigger things to come.  Now of course with what they say is social networking, 5 people could be managing 100.  5 people sitting in an office somewhere could manage 100 quite easily, or more, and get them all going at it and telling them to come out and loot.  Itís quite easy to do today with todayís climate of, again, austerity and massive taxation, no work, and all the rest of it.  Sure, yeah.

 

Daniel:  Well this is what Iím thinking because I remember with the student protests last year, Iíll never forget the police commissioner said at the end of it, because of all this, from what happened, he said, weíre considering banning anti-government marches.  And Iíll never forget that because it just seems too much of a coincidence, but it isnít a coincidence, that all of a sudden we have these spontaneous riots over 4 days in 9 different cities all around the country.† And the governmentís been recalled; theyíre at Cobra meeting deciding what to do.  I mean letís face it, we can see this is going to end up in a state of emergency, isnít it? 

 

Alan:  Well theyíve already said theyíre bringing 16,000 police in.  I wouldnít be surprised too if they brought special police units in from the rest of Europe for the first time to get that as a new normal for us all. And I think also that theyíre talking about bringing the military in, so theyíre probably preparing to advance if it doesnít cool down.  And it will be managed quite rapidly once that starts.

 

Daniel:  So to sum up, are you confident that this could be an orchestrated thing that weíre seeing here and itís not as genuine as weíre supposed to think it is?

 

Alan:  Very few things are genuine, on a scale like this.  The cops already had the ability to move in fast but they didnít.  They allowed it to continue; they stood back and watched the stores being looted.  So that right away there, thatís a message to the youngsters, continue because nothingís going to happen, obviously.  So they want a riot.  You understand, what theyíve created since 9/11 has been a police, an open police state.  Youíre living in an open police state.  And they havenít had the powers that they want to use.  Theyíve got the powers on paper but they havenít actually put them into operation or tested any of them out.  So this is a live test of it for bigger, much bigger things to come in the next few years.  Thatís all it really is to me as far as Iím concerned. 

 

Daniel:  I agree with that.  I wanted to ask your opinion.  And do you think weíre going to get a lot of retroactive prosecutions in the future, do you think, because thatís why theyíre monitoring?

 

Alan:  What theyíll do and theyíre already doing it, theyíre putting up, through all the CCTV cameras, which for one time suddenly theyíre all clear and sharp now, the pictures.† And theyíre putting up all the suspectsí faces.  That will also test out the procedure of who will turn who in, you see, because thatís part of the police state mentality is to get everybody spying on everybody else and turning everybody else in.  So again, you get this new society that will come out of it too.  Itís really a big test.  Itís also a predictive programming test for the public who are watching this on television, getting them used to that itís a scary world out there so we got to accept these new law enforcement measures and give them more ability to... why not just put cameras up in our houses so as they can watch us to see that weíre good and safe, you know.

 

Daniel:  Well thatís Big Brother, isnít it?  Thatís what theyíve done... Big Brother, isnít it?

 

Alan:  Thatís right.

 

Daniel:  Okay, Alan.  Well thanks for taking my call.

 

Alan:  And thanks for calling.

 

Yeah, itís definitely a big test.  And Iíll go back to an article I read; itís up in my archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  It was from The Guardian in 2007.  It was from the Department of Defence.  It sounded crazy at the time but I said, you wait and see, theyíll bring it on.  It says...

 

Revolution, flashmobs, and brain chips. A grim vision of the future

guardian.co.uk / Richard Norton-Taylor / 9 April 2007

 

(A:  This is a top military think tank for NATO and Britain.)

 

Information chips implanted in the brain. Electromagnetic pulse weapons. The middle classes becoming revolutionary, taking on the role of Marx's proletariat. The population of countries in the Middle East increasing by 132%, while Europe's drops as fertility falls. "Flashmobs" - groups rapidly mobilised by criminal gangs or terrorists groups.  (A:  Or, by the government.)

 

This is the world in 30 years' time envisaged by a Ministry of Defence team responsible for painting a picture of the "future strategic context" likely to face Britain's armed forces. It includes an "analysis of the key risks and shocks". Rear Admiral Chris Parry, head of the MoD's Development, Concepts & Doctrine Centre which drew up the report, describes the assessments as "probability-based, rather than predictive".

 

The 90-page report (A:  And itís on my web site too; Iíll pull it up tonight and you can download the whole lot.) comments on widely discussed issues such as the growing economic importance of India and China, the militarisation of space, and even what it calls "declining news quality" with the rise of "internet-enabled, citizen-journalists" and pressure to release stories "at the expense of facts". It includes other, some frightening, some reassuring, potential developments that are not so often discussed.

 

New weapons

An electromagnetic pulse will probably become operational by 2035 (A:  They have it now, by the way.) able to destroy all communications systems in a selected area or be used against a "world city" such as an international business service hub. (A:  It was announced in Britain a few months ago that under the Parliament, or under Whitehall, they have a pulse weapon that if they released it that everybody with a pacemaker or a diabetic pump, insulin pump, would have been killed, theyíd keel over within a 50-mile radius immediately and die.  Anyway, getting back to the article...) The development of neutron weapons which destroy living organisms but not buildings "might make a weapon of choice for extreme ethnic cleansing in an increasingly populated world". The use of unmanned weapons platforms (A:  Space weapons and so on...) would enable the "application of lethal force without human intervention, raising consequential legal and ethical issues". The "explicit use" of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons and devices delivered by unmanned vehicles or missiles.

 

Technology

By 2035, an implantable "information chip" could be wired directly to the brain. A growing pervasiveness of information communications technology will enable states, terrorists or criminals, to mobilise "flashmobs", challenging security forces to match this potential agility coupled with an ability to concentrate forces quickly in a small area.

 

Marxism

"The middle classes (A:  Eventually, as you go into austerity... this is before they mentioned the word austerity, because this is all planned you see.) could become a revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by Marx," says the report. The thesis is based on a growing gap between the middle classes and the super-rich on one hand and an urban under-class threatening social order: "The world's middle classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest". Marxism could also be revived, it says, because of global inequality. (A:  And by the way, Iíve had some letters from some actual Africans in Britain right now who are just visiting, who are Marxist, and theyíre all for this rioting going on.  Because under Marxism you must have the big riots to bring in your own group, right, an overthrow.)  An increased trend towards moral relativism and pragmatic values will encourage people to seek the "sanctuary provided by more rigid belief systems, including religious orthodoxy and doctrinaire political ideologies, such as popularism and Marxism".

 

Pressures leading to social unrest

By 2010 (A:  And thatís already gone...) more than 50% of the world's population will be living in urban rather than rural environments (A:  Itís only 6% now in the States on the land.), leading to social deprivation and "new instability risks", and the growth of shanty towns. By 2035, that figure will rise to 60%. Migration will increase. Globalisation may lead to levels of international integration that effectively bring inter-state warfare to an end. But it may lead to "inter-communal conflict" - communities with shared interests transcending national boundaries and resorting to the use of violence.

 

(A:  And it goes into...) Population and Resources (A:  ...causing social tensions, etc.)

 

(A:  It goes onto...) The Middle East (A:  Itís always a big thing for the Middle East.)

 

(A:  They go on about...) Islamic militancy

 

(A:  And then...) Iran (A:  ...how it will grow and grow and grow.)

 

Terrorism (A:  ...will be everywhere, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.)

 

(A:  And they even tack on...) Climate change (A:  ...Al Goreís climate change.)

 

Everythingís in here for the military. Thatís their scenario.  You should read through the 90-page report because they said theyíd use neutron bombs to basically neutralize large crowds that are rampaging through cities. 

 

"DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036" [PDF file, 6 MB] (U.K. Department of Defence Document)

 

2007 it was brought up, just to let you know, so nothing that wasnít planned and this is probably a bigger test than before.  Itís not a huge test yet, I mean it could be much bigger than it actually is, but itís definitely a test on the multi-jurisdictional task forces; thatís all your SWAT teams, your specially trained police, your Trident groups that go after firearms with firearms.  And they might even bring police in from abroad I believe for the first rapid deployment forces of the special police forces that they have now as well.  They even have a special military thatís already got 2 or 3 battalions in it for the European rapid response team.  So who knows?  It depends if they go looting tonight or if theyíve got enough televisions to last them a lifetime or whatever it happens to be.  Weíll see what happens and comes out of it.  But then they will make an example of all those that were photographed by picking them off one by one, and probably making a hullabaloo of, look we caught them, etc, etc, weíre doing our job, you need us.  Thatís the message to the public:  you need us.  So thatís that.

 

Alan:  Now, thereís also Paul from Ontario hanginí on there. Are you there Paul?

 

Paul:  Hi Alan.  How are you?

 

Alan:  Not too bad at all.

 

Paul:  Thatís good. Well first of all Iíve been a listener for a while and this is my first time calling in.† I wanted to start off by thanking you for some of the information you provide and the way it which you present it.  It really has augmented my undergraduate education in a profound way.  Everything from, you know, the round table system to NGOs to global governance as they say, and culture creation, itís really been a value to me and for that I thank you.  And I do plan on going forward myself and spreading the word quite frankly.  You donít have a choice.  Like you say, you do have a responsibility just as a doctor would in times of pandemic really.† But I really wanted to bring up with you tonight this perennial debate between intentionalism, in other words, you know, are things planned, or as compared to functionalism as they call it in the academic literature, in other words was something done by design or does it just sort of happen.  As you know, most people would like to go with the latter, just sort of stumbling along from one tragedy to the next, whether in globalist areas or national politics.† And thatís the way that itís typically presented to them.  Now, not everything is done with mustered intentionalism but these massive world changing political events and stratagems certainly are and we need to be able to recognize that.  And I have found out through studying history that, a great case study for that, for being able to recognize intentionalism, is Nazi Germany.† I mean, the historiography is marked with a staggering debate over whether or not they planned everything they did, or if through so-called functionalism it just sort of happened.  Which is really amazing to me.  I mean basically what theyíre suggesting is that this modern industrial-scale killing apparatus simply fell into place.

 

Alan:  Not only that, if you go even back further youíll find the same thing with Soviet Russia and the Bolshevik Revolution because they were funded into existence as well.  Remember, the West fed them initially; they had full-time ships going back and forth for 30 years under American aid and British aid to keep them going.  Because they couldnít even feed themselves because they killed off all the farmers; there was a big slaughter spree.  Meanwhile itís come out too that Lenin and all the top honchos of the Bolshevik party also left massive accounts, personal accounts in Switzerland, worth millions, you know, each.  So these were the great, great communists.  But the fact was, as I say, you can read Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, a great book, and you can also see the one of who funded communism and the Bolshevik Revolution as well. 

 

Paul:  Thereís also that great book, I Paid Hitler, by Thyssen who was the German industrialist who was basically talking about his links with the West.

 

Alan:  Yes.  And thereís also the Schacht family too that FDR was related to.  Hold on, weíll be back after this break.

 

Hi folks, weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to Paul from Ontario.  And itís really the two views of history, too, itís kind of like conspiracy theory versus the open theory.  I prefer to call it HG Wellsís theory, who called it The Open Conspiracy.  He said, we always tell the public what weíre going to do, itís their problem if they canít quite decipher it.  And thatís how the world is really, really run.  You have thousands upon thousands of think tanks, every countryís got them. They all work internationally with the other think tanks to make sure theyíre on track together.  Youíll find that they all come up with the same conclusions.  As I say, itís like before they did the World Trade Organization deal and the NAFTA and the GATT deals, where they planned to give their manufacturing bases to China and build up China to be the manufacturer of the world.† It didnít do it by itself.  The same as Brazil and India, we are funneling our tax money into those countries now, by international treaties, to build them up to first world countries as we go down the tubes.

 

Now, they knew when they were going to give all the factories to China there was going to be a big, big gap in employment, obviously, when thereís no factories for all those folk to work in anymore.  What are they going to do?  So they even knew, roughly, how long it would be before theyíd have riots in the streets, how many years it would take before the people would start rioting, when they found out theyíre not going to replace those jobs.  They donít make mistakes.† You donít make mistakes like, oh we did this and we didnít notice this would happen, we didnít think of that.  Nonsense!  Their whole job is to look at every possible repercussion to every law, treaty, whatever they sign, and they know whatís going to happen.  And thatís just the way the world is run.

 

Any big business could not be successful and survive if it didnít plan its investments 50 years plus down the road.  And thatís what they do.  Well when youíre government youíre even bigger than that.  And you donít hire thousands of professionals and people to come in, plan a whole future and leave anything to chance.  Nothing is left to chance.  Itís a battle plan basically and you expect people to come up and object in different segments of society to different parts of your plan and you even supply the leaders or the parties that will crop up, to make sure you guide all opposition down back into the slime.  Thatís how itís really, really worked out. 

 

Anthony C Sutton, Professor Sutton put out some amazing books and it was all documented books to do with who financed Adolf Hitler.  And he also had Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution.  And you canít understand it unless you read those books.  Remember, under the Trading with the Enemies Act even the Bush family, one of their seniors or their uncle, ended up in trouble because he was helping to finance Hitler.  So was Ford.   So was GM.  In fact, GM and Ford, by the way, both got recompensed for the allies bombing their factories in Germany and they got recompensed in the late 70s, if folk didnít know that.  We all paid them for their loss of production.  Isnít that nice? 

 

So the big boys never, never lose out at all.  Is Paul still there? 

 

Paul:  Yeah, just along those same lines as we move sort of to the one world model, they definitely do seem to have it down to a fine science and itís kind of difficult to understand why people canít understand, you know, sort of long-term political statecraft.  I mean, itís been with us for a long time.† But would you, in your opinion would you say as a result of the spread of atomic weaponry to all the major powers, that we are indeed past open conventional large-scale interstate warfare?

 

Alan:  Weíre using other techniques now.  Weíve been using weather warfare for years and that came out at the United Nations in the 70s.   Thatís when all the countries were called in to sign the treaty not to use it.  As Brzezinski said, itís the perfect weapon, no one knows that youíre using it; they canít prove it, all they can see is the effects of it.  So he said it makes atomic weaponry obsolete. And you also have covert weaponry to do with bacterial and viral warfare thatís released once in while in different areas across the world.  Africa was the testing ground for all the Western laboratories for that.  So weíre way beyond all of that.  Thanks for calling, thatís the end of the show.

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Fannie Mae Holds Hand Out Again--5.1 Billion This Time

Downgrades and Global Selloffs

Al Gore admits Defeat

Al Gore Loses Cool as CO2 Myth and Global Warming Take a Dive (with Audio Links)

London Riots Take First Life

Wanted for Looting

Troops Prepare to Deal with Looters and Arsonists

Violence Across England

Police Stand By while Shops Looted and Burned

Riots Across London

Sale of the Century in London

New Lucrative Business--Stamina Pills from Dead Babies

Revolution Flashmobs and Brain chips--Article from 2007

"DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036" [PDF file, 6 MB] (U.K. Department of Defence Document).