June 23rd, 2011 (#861)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 23rd, 2011:
By Way of Deception, Aliens Up for Election?
"Lots of Cash Fed to Scientists, Busy Little
When Experimental Aircraft Fly, They've Ways to Deceive Us,
It's a Bird - a Plane - It's a UFO, The News Will Announce,
And a Belief Starved Populace is Ready for to Pounce,
An Unidentified Object is One Which No Nation Claims,
Yet All Big Nations are Playing High-Flying Games,
Cults Spring Up, Enthusiastic, Praying for Arrival
Of Beneficent Aliens Who'll Help with Our Survival,
Some Gurus say Space Masters are On Route, Very Near,
Pray for Intelligent Life Out There, 'cos There Sure Ain't None Down Here"
© Alan Watt June 23rd, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – June 23rd, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 23rd of June, 2011. For newcomers to this broadcast, look into the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you’ll find hundreds and hundreds of audios to download for free, where you can hopefully get the shortcuts to understanding this big system that you’ve been brainwashed not to see, through your educational system and the media. I try and show you how it all links together, with big foundations, big international banks, corporations, etc, and how they literally form a parallel government, and they’ve been here for an awful long time. And some of the big players to do with this parallel government have written their whole memoirs telling you where the whole world is going, how it’s going to be, and all the rest of it. And I give you the links to them, etc. So, help yourself to those, and remember, all the sites you see listed on the .com site have transcripts in English for download and print-up. And if you want transcripts in other languages, go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, and you’ll find a variety offered there.
Remember too, you’re the audience that bring me to you, so you can help buy the books, and discs that I have on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And from the US to Canada, you can use a personal check, still. You can use an international postal money order, still. And you can send cash. And you can also use PayPal. You’ll find it on the .com site. There’s a donation button. Use that, and I’ll get the order right out to you. Remember, straight donations, too, are very, very welcome. After the donation, remember to send an email with name, address, and order as well, just to verify it, to make sure I don’t lose it. And across the rest of the world, you’ve got Western Union, you have Money Gram, and again you have PayPal, using the donation button. Follow it with an email, name, address, and order, I’ll get it out to you. You know, Canada Post has been on strike for about a week, and apparently they’re getting ordered back to work today or tomorrow, by the government, because everything has kind of stopped on that front. So, you can continue to order, and hopefully I can get things out next Monday.
We live in a world, again, that we’ve been conditioned not to see. And as I’ve said before, if your parents don’t know, then you won’t know. All mammals are the same. You look to your parents to warn you of what creatures are dangerous to you, and how to avoid them. And if your parents don’t know, then you’ll get eaten. And it’s the same with humans. Just another mammal. If your parents think everything is normal and quite natural and sit and watch television every night, then you’ll grow up thinking the same thing as them. Your education is meant to reinforce this delusion really, which is a fixed, false belief that everything is quite natural. And the media and the entertainment business take over as well. And they’ve got every generation and ages within the generations sussed out perfectly. They know exactly what to target for the five year olds, ten year olds, fifteen, twenty, thirty, forty, etc. So, it’s so well orchestrated this world in which we live. And they know that you’re worried about different things when you’re forty or fifty, you’re worried about your pension coming up, will you have a job, what’s your pension going to be worth. That kind of stuff. When you’re a teenager you get lots of sex, a big candy store of sex now, and that will keep you busy for quite some years in fact, and you won’t really care about anything else that’s happening in the world. And for the youngsters, they’re training them to be interested in sex through their education at school and through all the music television, and all the movies that they watch as well. So, everybody is worked out in their own age-group perfectly. Perfectly well understood, because, as Plato said, culture comes down from the top. It must be authorized. Any unauthorized culture could destroy the system, and so it has to come down from the top. And he also mentioned that they work together. And that was drama. Today we’d say movies, and he said, the music, the musicians, and the kinds of music they play, and also the fashion industry. Nothing has changed in 2300-odd years. Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, we’re back and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Everything in this world really has a different purpose from the purposes that they make you believe they’re intended for. And it’s very, very Orwellian indeed. You have to look around 180 degrees to find out what’s really happening, or what an institution or organization is actually there for, and even within your own governments, different departments. And we know that the big plan, of course, through all of the big foundations that work together, they’re all on board, as the pirates like to say, themselves, that they want to bring in a planned society. And the whole idea with climate propaganda is to be the big stick to force us all to live in sustainable communities, bring down the population, share your wealth across the world. All the old Communist or Socialist Manifestos. And it’s working very well, because everyone is on board with it. They’ve put so many lies out, and they’re backed with so much money, because the foundations are actually owned by the big banking boys. I’m talking about the international moneylenders, in fact, and captains of industry. I think they’re like generals of industry really. And they form the parallel government. And they fund these armies of non-governmental organizations. They fund textbooks for colleges and universities, to make sure the propaganda is getting into all the right places. And they hand so many press releases out to the press that are immediately just put right in newspapers, and they get lots of exposés on television too, because, you see, we must believe, you understand.
We’ve got to believe. It’s like George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, where Smith is being tortured, and O’Brien keeps saying, “How many fingers am I holding?” And by this time, Smith knows how many he’s supposed to see. He doesn’t really see that, but he’s supposed to see it, and he says, anything that you want. And that’s what Big Brother wants you to do; whatever reality he gives you, you must believe it. And if he says he can fly, then you must believe it. And you’ll really suffer if you don’t. This is the world to do with Agenda 21, sustainable development, and climate change, of course, which they really latched on to, a long, long time ago, as a good one to use. In fact, go back to the books, many years, go over them, and you’ll find that the same guys who are writing about global warming were putting out best-sellers back in the sixties, early seventies, to do with the coming Ice Age. Same authors.
So, here’s an article here. It’s from the Washington Times. It says:
EDITORIAL: U.N. climate propaganda exposed
Industry lobbyists behind ‘scientific’ claims in IPCC
(Alan: That’s the United Nations panel on climate change, which is headed by an ex-railway driver, Mr. Pachauri. It’s a press release:)
The entire world will soon depend on renewable energy so governments ought to start subsidizing these industries immediately.
(A: This is from the IPCC at the United Nations.)
So said the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in a report released Tuesday.
(A: That’s a political panel. They have nothing to do with science.)
The study’s conclusion was such a blockbuster that the panel issued a press release last month previewing the finding. “Close to 80 percent of the world’s energy supply could be met by renewables by mid-century if backed by the right enabling public policies a new report shows,” it proclaimed.
Since this statement was supposedly based on actual scientific research, Steve McIntyre, editor of the Climate Audit blog, did what the IPCC must have assumed nobody would bother doing. He checked the sources cited in the report. He discovered the IPCC’s banner claim was not the work of prestigious and disinterested scientists toiling away in a laboratory, but of hacks with a political agenda and direct financial stake in the issue.
(A: Yeah, because there’s big money involved in this.)
The 80 percent claim was lifted directly from a paper entitled, “Energy evolution 2010 - a Sustainable World Energy Outlook,” whose primary authors included Sven Teske from Greenpeace and Christine Lins from the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC).
(A: So they wrote the report.)
According to the latter group’s website, it is “the united voice of the European renewable energy industry.” EREC speaks on behalf of the companies that make windmills, solar panels and other uneconomic forms of energy that rely upon heavy government subsidies to turn a profit. Not surprisingly, the IPCC’s primary goal has been to browbeat governments around the world into pouring taxpayer cash into this rent-seeking industry.
In addition to being the source of the 80 percent claim, the Greenpeace activist also happened to be a primary author of the relevant chapter of the new IPCC report,
(A: No conflict of interest there.)
“Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation” (SRREN). The incestuous relationship is not limited to Mr. Teske. Greenpeace and the renewable-energy lobby jointly released a version of the “Energy evolution” report that contained a forward by Rajendra K. Pachauri, (A: He’s the railway engineer.) the IPCC’s director general.
The IPCC sees nothing wrong with this arrangement.
(A: So they get their own guys to write up the reports as official reports for the public, right?)
“The IPCC relies on a wide range of expertise including authors from the business sector as well as from NGOs and academia,”
(A: Well, you can trust them, eh.)
IPCC spokesman Rockaya Aidara told The Washington Times. “Sven Teske is one of nine lead authors of Chapter 10 of the SRREN.
(A: That’s their big report.)
Two coordinating lead authors have overseen the process of writing this chapter. It was a balanced team work with different views and expertises represented.”
Claims of balance are hardly credible when the process is infiltrated by ideologues and industry insiders looking to apply the veneer of science to their craven grab for other people’s cash. Fortunately, the days when leftists could get away with passing off their global-warming scare stories unchallenged are over. Skeptics smell blood and closely examine every document, frequently identifying gaping holes in logic and credibility.
That’s why the Environmental Protection Agency needs to pull the plug on the job-crushing cap-and-trade style regulations
(A: That’s your carbon taxes they want to bring in.)
it seeks to impose. The agency based the whole of its “endangerment finding” on the work of IPCC, as if it were scientific. It would be more honest for the EPA to say its rules are based on the desire of Greenpeace and the renewable-energy industry to raise taxes on competing sources of electricity. They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this fraud.
You’re darn right they shouldn’t. And we shouldn’t be paying them a darn cent either. And Mr. Pachauri should go back to driving train engines, if he can find his way, along the line. And that’s what it’s all about. It’s a political agenda, apart from that too. It’s not just all cash, even though Pachauri himself has been done a few times for funneling cash from the UN into his own little private businesses in India. More than just a few, you know, mill. Anyway, this is corruption. And corruption is very rampant in these leftist organizations.
Now, there’s an article too about the hacking that’s going on across the planet, supposedly. It says:
Hackers 'steal entire 2011 census'
The entire 2011 UK census database has been stolen by hackers and will be published online, it has been claimed.
(A: It’s hard to know if this is true or not. And this is from the Telegraph, anyway.)
Ryan Cleary, an alleged member of the hacking group behind the claim, LulzSec, was arrested in Essex this morning by specialist cyber crime officers from Scotland Yard.
The 19-year-old was taken to a central London police station (A: Etc, etc, etc.)
A “significant amount of material” was also seized from an address in Wickford, Essex.
So, I don’t know if they got the whole census or not. And it wouldn’t surprise me. I mean, Britain has been so careless with its security. They’ve had so many exposés of people and people on welfare and everything else and medical records getting put all over the planet by different peoples. And they keep telling us it’s safe, it’s safe, isn’t it. This internet is so safe, isn’t it. But then, it’s not really there for all that. It’s really there to really get all your data on a daily basis, since you help them so well.
Apple, of course. We’ve had so many police now and governments getting in the heat, getting put in the spotlight for allowing cops to get off with murder, literally murder, by shooting people, beating them over the heads and stuff, and with people having cameras on their phones, they want to stop it. So:
Now Apple wants to block iPhone users from filming live events with their smartphone
(A: The excuse they give us is so you won’t, you know, steal people’s music, etc., live in concert. But the reality is it’s for the cops, who are going to get more and more volatile on the public, because they’ll be told to get more volatile on the public to keep us in line as we go into this austerity blitz of poverty. Anyway, it says:)
Holding up an iPhone will trigger infra-red sensors installed at the venue
These instruct the device to shut down its camera
(A: The cops will also have them, obviously.)
The days of filming a live concert or sporting event on your iPhone may soon be a distant memory.
Apple is developing software that will sense when a smartphone user is trying to record a live event, and then switch off the device's camera.
Anybody holding up their iPhone will find it triggers infra-red sensors installed at the venue.
These sensors would then automatically instruct the iPhone to shut down its camera function, preventing footage from being recorded.
Only the iPhone's camera would be temporarily disabled; other features, such as texting and making calls, would still work.
It will be for the police, as well, as you darn well know that’s the real reason for it all. There’s been so many, so many cops now, because the cops have all got the message. They’re allowed to kill people. That’s part of the new authoritarian society that the Club of Rome suggested, remember. And it’s a sort of permission they’re getting from the fact they’re not being thrown in prison. That ripples right through their brotherhood, as they like to call themselves, the fraternity, and they all get the message they’re allowed to kill folk. And lots of them are actually going ahead and doing it. And that’s to train us too, to just simply jump and obey. And:
Telstra, Optus to start censoring the web next month
MOST Australian internet users will have their web access censored next month after the country's two largest internet providers agreed to voluntarily block more than 500 websites from view.
And they are Telstra and Optus. That’s starting with them. And we’ll see how that goes, and if anyone else copies them in the near future, because that’s the way it’s all going to go, as you know. And I’m going to talk more about the climate debate, after I come back from this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Now, I’m sure most of you know that Australia is the test bed really for the carbon taxes, and they’ll iron out all the problems to find ways to sneak it into our countries, to make it even easier for us all to accept it really. And I said from the very beginning, it was never to do with big corporations, etc. They’ll get the cash. They’re already trading carbon taxes amongst themselves and making a fortune off it. It’s the public that pay it all. And that was always the intention of it. And it Australia too, the climate scientists, there’s big articles out there where they’re claiming they had to move, the ones who came out with all this rubbish, because they say they’re having death threats from the general public, who are rather annoyed at all their nonsense that they’ve dreamed up, under the guise of carbon. Anyway, this article here talks about the climate debate. It’s hysterical says the chief scientist. So, he’s on board of course, because this is part of his job, because he’s on board with the whole climate agenda.
AUSTRALIA'S chief scientist Ian Chubb has waded into the highly charged debate surrounding climate change, arguing people who disagree with the scientific evidence supporting human-induced global warming do not "deserve equal weight".
(A: That means equal authority of opinion.)
Professor Chubb yesterday used the stage at the National Press Club in Canberra to say the debate on climate change had been "appalling" and "hysterical", and to label the scientific literacy of politicians as lacking.
He also signalled his intention to take a more robust involvement in policy development.
Professor Chubb took over the job after Penny Sackett, who failed to secure one face-to-face meeting with Julia Gillard, resigned earlier this year.
(A: Julia Gillard is their Fabian prime minister. It says here:)
He yesterday took aim at the media's coverage of the climate change debate, saying it had not conveyed the science in a "proper and balanced" way.
"I think attacking people because they're giving a message is appalling. I think some of the language that's used is bordering on the hysterical," he said. "I've seen literature that suggests (more than) 90 per cent of experts in climate science are all of one view.
(A: And that’s an utter lie. I’ve got so many reports from scientists, thousands of them actually, who say it’s all nonsense. )
And that is that the planet is warming and humans have intervened to accelerate that process.
(A: So he’s blaming humans for causing the problem, which is of course what has to get drummed into us, so as we’ll become sterilized all quite happily. That’s the few that are still fertile will allow themselves to be sterilized.)
"So somebody who comes along and says it's not true doesn't deserve equal weight.
So, unless you parrot the Communist line here, and say, “Yep, humans are causing it all,” then your opinion is of no value at all, he’s basically saying. What a prune this guy is, eh? This chubby, Chubb guy. He’s rather locked up on himself, I’d say. Anyway, this is the sort of character that they put in charge, who literally is intolerant, and he’s not open. A scientist has to have an open mind, you understand, to all points of view. This guy has none. Because it’s a political agenda, as I say, and a commercial agenda for the big corporations who already trading millions of dollars of carbon taxes and credits as they call it. The European Union gave millions out to all the big corporations to get them trading a few years ago, and they’ve actually said they’re making profits off it. So it’s not to benefit the ordinary people, as you well know. Now, I’ll go to the phones now. There’s Larry from LA on the line, if he’s there. Is Larry still there?
Larry: Yes. Alan, there’s a scenario in history I want to get your opinion about. It’s about this king, his name was Montezuma. And he mistook the conquerors for the gods, because he had it in his legend, because they had iron shiny breastplates, the arrows bounced off, and they had fire sticks. Just a handful of them got in. They were invited in, got in, thousands of them, slaughtered thousands and seized the king and got the kingdom. Now, to bring this to today’s history, do you think it could be in the consideration of the elite’s minds, they’ve got safe havens. They could dig in probably at least three generations. You can burn the whole surface, every city, and just annihilate the world, virtually. And we already know, you can live where an atomic bomb went off, at Nagasaki, Hiroshima. Okay. So, do you think it’s in their minds to go in their safe havens, burn the earth, come out, and round up the survivors with their fancy flying machines, and giant tanks, big guns, and warships, and say we are the gods and get the people to bow down to them again?
Alan: It would not be impossible, because they have discussed this at high-level meetings, all possible scenarios; under the guise of atomic warfare they even did all that then. And that’s when they used, this is the beauty of tax money, they used the tax money of the peoples during the Cold War to build hundreds of underground, some of them are little cities, actually, with their own barbershops inside them and everything, to keep the right people through maybe even for a thousand years, in a fair state of luxury and comfort and so on, stacked with all the kinds of foods. They even have underground hydroponics and things like that. They actually have these, and I put up a link a while back, of some of them in Britain, under different buildings for the top politicians, the House of Lords, and people like that, the Queen, that a guy actually did. And so, they have them all over the place. You also take into account what they have is the Arks they call them. Not just the ones for the seeds, the good seed, they also have Arks, containing all the DNA of every species on the planet of everything that grows or lives in any form whatsoever. One of them is in New Orleans and it’s called an Ark. Public broadcasting service showed a documentary on one of them. It was headed by a woman scientist who also teaches at a university there. She literally said, everything is frozen in an embryo stage, and we can bring these things alive at any time in the future we want, even a hundred years time. Hold on, I’ll get into more of that, when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, we’re back and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, talking to Larry from LA, talking about is it possible the elite have already got plans to survive for some lengthy period of time, perhaps underground, for instance, and come out later on when everything is wiped out and destroyed. And they do exercises, simulated exercises like that. Rand organization, this strange not-for-profit organization that does all these big, big surveys for every government across the planet, and for the Pentagon and elsewhere, they came out with a whole bunch of measures, could they survive. How many could survive. And what would their population have to be even to repopulate the earth. All that kind of stuff. And I mentioned that they have Arks. One is not just for food, for seed, but also for people and all animals, grass, everything, stored in they say three across the world, just for that type. And they can actually keep sperm and ovum of different creatures together, put it together at any time after dethawing them in the petri dish, and then insert them into any carrier, any mammal carrier. So even a human could get born inside some other kind of creature. And she said, this woman from one of the Arks, she said, they’d actually tried this and it’s very successful. So they’re all ready for this whole setup. They’re all completely ready for it.
And I’ll tell you another thing too. Years ago I talked about my impression when I first came to Canada and went through the States, and what I noticed right off the bat, was everything looked so temporary. The houses were made of wood, basically, with wooden siding. Now it’s all plastic siding; it’s even easier to destroy. The telephone lines, the power lines, were all on poles above the ground. Easy to dismantle, destroy, get rid of. And I thought, what a contrast to some other countries. It looks so temporary. That was my first impression, that there’s a temporary time period for all this to stand before it would be knocked down or something else was to come afterwards.
And, at the top, they talk about end of life extinction. And it’s called ELE. If you look it up at university websites, you’ll see some of them teach this to members of government, where they bring in various professors of science and history and geology and they talk about previous wiping out of the planet, and where did the dinosaurs go? Where did this group go? They know at different times different parts of the world had been wiped out. So, this is always on their minds, because it’s very true, very true. So much of your money always goes to ensure that the preservation of the elite go on down through time. That’s the first thing that they must protect. And that’s the first thing that all governments protect. It isn’t just protection of government to ensure its continuity, it’s to protect the elite and ensure their continuity, because to them, that’s all that matters. So, I would say absolutely. They can do this at any time they want. I’ve seen the documentaries put out by very reputable people on some of these underground bases, bunkers. Some of them are cities, as I say. One of them in London literally has their own bar for them. Bar, as I say, barber’s shops, and so on, underneath them so they don’t get bored, movie houses, stuff like that. So, our tax money built it all for the elite to go on down into time.
The US also built a continuity of government, which is also for the elite, base in Australia for themselves to go, should anything break out in the Northern Hemisphere. That was a few years back. So, they’re always, this is always utmost in their mind, even if it happens from some unforeseen circumstance, something coming in, an asteroid, whatever, they’re insuring of their own survival down through time.
Larry: Yeah. Now, Alan due to the idea of the Arks and collecting all the genetics of every living thing on the planet, that tells me they have a fear, and that fear would be destroying the life of any single entity. They don’t want to destroy all of any single entity, because they don’t know that in the future they might not need it for their own survivability.
Alan: Absolutely. Right now for instance, what they’re doing now, now that nothing unforeseen is happening, and we have the weather modification, they’re controlling that. They will give us food shortages this year, because they’re drowning the breadbaskets of the US and Canada. There’s just standing clouds over them, just pouring rain. So they’ll do it in different places, but not all at once, at the moment. They’re also, as I say, ensuring their own preservation down into the future, regardless of circumstances. They’re rewilding the areas with wolves and mountain lions for goodness sake, in places like Florida. Panorama did a great documentary on that. And the public are told just to accept it, you can’t shoot them, oh, that’s illegal. If this thing is wanting to eat you, just be eaten. Well, you know, it’s time the public got back into some common sense, and some guts as well, and did something about it, because what a cheek, what a cheek, what a nerve, what a nerve to rewild these animals into populated areas of humans, while you’re still basically the tenant, they’re moving these things in for their future, not for your future. You’re all supposed to move into the big cities where you’ll get some measure of protection maybe, but I mean, how many slaps in the face will the public take before they stand up and say, “Hey. That’s enough. You’re not going to rewild carnivores in my area, while I’m still walking around here.” You know. It’s so disgusting.”
Larry: Yeah, that’s the $64,000 question. Alan, would you ever consider being a guest on a talk shoe program, or that’s not possible?
Alan: Send me an email and I’ll get back to you on it then.
Larry: Okay. You can see what it’s about. And I’ll send you the email. I appreciate you, and you have a good one.
Alan: And you too. I meant to say too, you see, that high technology is also really viewed as magic by people who are ignorant. That’s what scientists have always said. And they’re using high technology now to modify the weather. They’ve been doing it for years. It’s a perfected art now. It’s no big deal. It’s not experimentation. They know what they’re doing. And they can make anything happen on a disaster level if they want to, at any time they want to. And they can bring on the food shortages too, just by drowning us out, or else giving us no rain at all. They’ve tried both methods. So, it’s quite fascinating to see all this happening. You’re living through it. You know what they want to do, and they’re talking about, I don’t know if you ever saw the old Star Trek movie. I think one of them was called, was it the Genesis Project? Where they were reseeding a planet, as they called it, by increasing its oxygen and getting all life started from scratch. Well, this is basically the stuff they talk about if necessary to do after a nuclear war, after they’ve been in their bunkers for so many thousands of years. And they won’t be suffering either in these bunkers. You’ve got to understand, everything that could possibly happen in an atomic warfare age has already been thoroughly bashed out and hashed out, by them, and all the things they could do to preserve themselves have already been done. Already been done. I was going to say too, yeah, when high science is viewed upon as magic by those beneath them, the primitives, then with Montezuma’s age too, when the conquistadors came in, they also were riding horses then. Of course, the natives had never seen horses before, and they thought that man and beast were one creature. They didn’t know it was two separate creatures. So that added to the terror as well. Now, I’ll go to the next caller, and it’s Mike from Wyoming. Hello Mike.
Mike: Good evening, Alan. Let me get you thinking about numerology for a second. The number 40 recurs within the old and new Testaments, multiple times. What significance does that number have?
Alan: Forty is also a degree in a much higher Masonry. And that’s why you say life begins at forty. That’s where the saying comes from. You’re brought into true life and understanding at forty. It’s also from Hasidic Judaism, because they’re supposed to study the Talmud up until forty, and only then they’re supposed to start studying Kabala with numerology, etc. Then they’ll understand it more, but not until forty.
Mike: Where does the fascination with that number start, though?
Alan: I think it probably came from, see, forty, even in the ancient times, and you’ll find it even in Biblical references, forty really meant immeasurable, massive, in other words, almost countless. They often use the word forty; the wilderness of Sin, forty years, stuff like that. That has a totally different meaning too, then what people think it means. Anyway, forty is so important. And the number four itself is so important, because the quaternary as they call it, the number four, has all of the measures of the trinity, plus the occult side too. And they often refer to that as the Magician, the number four is the Magician, the one who’s higher than the rest of orders, spiritual, temporal, and so on. He’s higher than them, but he also has the ability to change reality for the world. So, in the occult language, they use that. They also call him Black Jethro, by the way, as a sort of nickname in the occult. Four is also where you stand. Foursquare. Again, you have the foursquare building. And the perfect Ashlar or stone that’s been cut to be the good Mason, has also, again, it’s got the four main sides on it, you might say. If you hollowed it out, it would be just a wall in itself, with the four sides. So, four also means perfection to an extent.
Mike: Ten also has some significance, doesn’t it, as in you know, four times ten?
Alan: That’s right. There are certain numbers, as you know, if you go through them, they always crop up the same numbers over and over again, or they dominate the numbers they’re going to multiply.
Mike: I was listening to your previous caller, and I just happened to think about this attorney we have locally here. This is a small town of about 11,000 people in south-western Wyoming. There’s an attorney who also has a degree in molecular biology and he’s in the process of giving a series of talks to the local senior centers, on UFO-ology, which he’s been a student of for many years. And it struck me that they lay out so many false paths, you don’t know which way they’re going to go, but this certainly could be one. In fact, my barber was regaling me with this possibility today, you know, are they going to give us a kind of an Independence Day scenario, you know, thinking back to that recent movie, where they, you know, send out phony UFOs with some kind of genetically engineered organism, so that we can all unite under one banner, the UN banner, I guess, to fight these supposed extra-terrestrials that they’ve probably designed in the Pentagon or some Pentagon funded research.
Alan: You know, it would sound farcical if so many presidents hadn’t talked about it, because presidents, I think Reagan talked about UFOs and invasion, if only that was an invasion, he said, it would bring us all together in this world, you know. And of course, they had movies out too, The Day the Earth Stood Still, version 1 and 2, where the UN would take over, all the scientists would run the world rather than a sort of democratic election. That was always the message, but it would bring us all together. And I think it was Lester B Pearson also came out with that. He helped draft up the UN Communist Manifesto with Hiss and a couple of other Canadians, and he mentioned it as well in one of his speeches, and he became the top guy at the UN at one point, and he said the same thing, if we’re attacked from outer space, it would be a perfect way for the whole world to come together as one people and basically form a new kind of system and a new way of living. But it didn’t start with him. I think you can go back to John Dewey who was the first guy to use that particular terminology and that particular aspect to bring the world together. That’s an awful long time ago.
Mike: Henry Kissinger too, his famous quote about people in Los Angeles objecting now to the blue helmets, but if confronted with a threat, whether real or promulgated, you know, they would gladly bear the boot of the UN soldiers.
Alan: That’s right.
Mike: Yeah, and I was struck too. I was kind of a fan of the old movie with Michael Renne, The Day the Earth Stood Still. I was puzzling over why they would remake it when it’s still, it pretty well stood the test of time.
Alan: I’ll tell you why they remake it, and I’ve noticed in a few movies they’ve remade, actually, that were very important movies to do with giving up your rights and going under the United Nations and letting Mr. Pachauri and others rob you blind, but it was to bring in the more modern, politically correct messages along the way. Because they’ve updated us all into political correctness now. We know it’s politically correct. And to bring it up to date. And really, that’s what they’re doing is bringing it all up to date. Oh, mankind is destroying the planet. That’s all in there too, all the global warming stuff and etc, so they keep updating the movies to bring in all the politically correct messages for the youth of today.
Mike: You know, sometimes, I’m sure you’re a little like I am, you know, that you get a little bit depressed, a little bit anxious over what’s happening, but you know, as I talk to people across this country, here in the US, I talked to a lady today, I was trying to send out a counsel case, I had a difficult case, and I was looking up a guy that I had taken a course under years ago, and I ended up talking to a lady who worked with him for like thirty years. It turned out the guy had been shot by one of his fellows, shot and killed. I hadn’t heard about this. But at any rate, she’s in Tennessee, and I was asking her how the weather had been down there, and just kind of making casual conversation, and she said, oh, yeah, it had been very nasty, not as bad as in Joplin, Missouri. And I said, it makes you wonder. We’ve had this incredible string of bad luck, you know, in the Midwest, right in the breadbasket of the country, you know, given that the government has this weather control technology. And when I bring up that topic, you know, I don’t hear anyone saying, boy, you’ve got some kooky ideas, or you know, I don’t get weird looks anymore. People generally, and this lady agreed with me. She said, yeah, I think you’re right on target. So, somehow the information is getting out there.
Alan: Yeah, it’s getting out. They still don’t want to believe that they’d actually do it to us, because we’re nice people. You see, we’re nice people and we judge everybody else by the way we are. And of course, you have psychopaths at the top. But they’re starting to get it, as you say. They know it’s not global warming. We’ve been cooler than ever before. It’s cool and rainy all the time, and it’s been like that for quite some time, and so they know we’re being lied to, even by their own experiences. We’re not getting roasted. It’s the opposite that’s happening.
Mike: Yeah. Well, thanks very much, Alan, I appreciate it.
Alan: Thanks for calling. And I’ll be back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And just before I go to the next caller, this is from one of the guys who went up high at the United Nations, and in Canada, Lester B Pearson, the guy I mentioned, he says, “Perhaps there’s a hopeful possibility here in the conquest of outer space. Interplanetary activity may well give us planetary peace. Once we discover Martian spaceships hovering over the earth’s airspace, we’ll all come together. How dare they threaten us like this, we shall shout, as one, at a really United Nations.” And that was Canadian diplomat, Lester Pearson, Nobel Peace Prize Lecture, given in December, 1957. This is an actual cut-out from an actual paper. I’ve got it here. So, they’ve been at this idea for an awful long time. Now, we’ll go now to Lucretia, from Oregon, if she’s there.
Lucretia: Hi, Alan. Thank you. Yes, I’ve wanted to thank you for that link of John Taylor Gatto. I have his book, but that hour talk he gave was just phenomenal on how they’ve dumbed us down and their plans. And they’ve basically made juveniles out of all men, you know, just keeping them into sports. And I really hope everybody listens to that link you put up there, with John Taylor Gatto. That was excellent. And then if you get a chance, you know, the first caller there was talking about, you know, they probably have a safe place, and it was fascinating. I heard a caller talk the other night on the Bosnian pyramid. They say this pyramid literally has incredible energy coming out of it, and food, and it just doesn’t go bad, and the oxygen is just incredibly pure in there. And what else. Let’s see, there’s no radiation, whereas normally when you get down into the ground. The technology that they have, and this pyramid is definitely way over ten thousand years old, it’s fascinating, how they probably have incredible, immaculate cities underground.
Alan: Well, you can actually go into, look up a search for Cheyenne Mountain, in the US, and they built, they literally excavated an entire mountain. They built a railroad up to it to take away the dirt. And this was never released to the public. It shows you the secrecy of the forces, the armed forces and so on. They used brand new techniques of reinforcing the outer edge of the mountain so it wouldn’t collapse and fall in on itself, could withstand atomic warfare, it had enough food in different levels, underneath it, to keep a massive community going, for, who knows, maybe five hundred, a thousand years. We paid for all of that, and that’s only one of them that they have in the US. They actually, at least on that one, did a documentary not too long ago on it. And it’s been there since I think the 60s. It shows you the kind of work that goes on so quietly and with such incredible secrecy, using your tax money, again, to make sure that a few can live and survive for who knows how many thousands of years. You’re only limited really to your ability to make oxygen, and that’s an old science now in the high-tech field, and grow your own food underground. That’s old stuff again. They were trying that back in the late 40s, for the elites, underground shelters, hydroponic foods.
Lucretia: I wonder if they can grow things like nectarines and strawberries as well.
Alan: Oh, why not. I don’t see why not. It’s all temperature control and the right kind of lighting.
Lucretia: Sure, well, yeah, and then you were talking about the underground road all the way from Canada to Russia.
Alan: That was in the mainstream paper, a few years back. They were doing it from Pigeon Lake, British Columbia. It was a Russian scientist that designed it. It was supposed to be completed by 1999 or the year 2000, and that’s the last we heard. And it was to come out near a lake in Russia. And it said this was the fourth one they’d done. And I thought, we know nothing here. Nothing at all. That was the mainstream media.
Lucretia: Thank you. Sorry, I didn’t get to my main question, I’ll call back. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, where it’s glub-glub-glub with all the rain, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
UN's Panel on Climate Change--Financial and Political Objectives Exposed
Hackers Steal Entire 2011 Census?
iPhone Camera Blocking Technology for Police
Australia--Optus to Start Censoring the Web Next Month
Chief Aussie Scientist says "Those Opposing Human Induced Global Warming Do Not Deserve Equal Weight in Debate"
Documentary--Britain's Underground Facilities (a Tiny Few)