May 27th, 2011 (#842)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 27th, 2011:
Don't Need Detective to Spot Global Collective:
"We Can Look at Europe in Contemplation
Of a Cloned North American Integration,
Annual Meetings Held and Still Ongoing,
Piles of Documents Signed Without Us Knowing,
The World Business Plan Designed by "Betters",
Will Integrate Regions into Bondage & Fetters,
Because High Minds Know How We Should Live,
And the Purpose of Peasantry is to Work and Give,
Regional Blocs Under a World Gov.,
Where P.C. Rules Shower Down From Above,
Control Freaks Ordering From Dawn to Dusk,
Austerity Measures Will Dole You a Crust,
Regional Democracy Blocs All Under One,
Authoritarian, Debt-Ridden, It's Almost Done"
© Alan Watt May 27th, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – May 27th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 27th of May, 2011. I always start off by advising newcomers to the broadcast to look at cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Help yourself to the audios there for download, hundreds of them to choose from, where I try and show you the shortcuts really to understanding the big system which runs the world. And it’s not the one that you think it is. It’s not individual governments and politicians. It shows you the superstructure above them with the organizations that have been at this for an awful long time. Very rich organizations, in fact, and how they set a plan up a long time ago through their wealth, incredible wealth, to take over all the remaining wealth of the planet through resources; gold, diamonds, food eventually and everything else, and how they’ve pretty well done it up to the present time. The same group that formed the United Nations. The same group that funded the Soviet system and every other system, and how they get conflicts going, and then they direct the conflict into the new society that they want to come around. You can’t have anything changing without conflict, so they create the conflicts and guide them. So, help yourself to the audios.
Remember too, that you’re an audience that bring me to you, so you can help me by supporting me and buying the books and discs I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And remember too, that apart from the audios on all those sites you see listed there, you can also download transcripts in English of a lot of the talks that I’ve given over the years. And if you go into Alanwattsentientsentinel.eu you can have your pick of a variety of other languages offered as well. Remember too, from the US to Canada, if you want to order, you can go into the website. You’ll see how to do it. You can use a personal check or an international postal money order from the US to Canada. You can use cash. And you can also use PayPal. Use the donation button, and follow it with an email, name, address, and order. I’ll get it out to you. And then, across the rest of the world, you’re left with Western Union, Money Gram, or again, PayPal, use the donation button. And remember straight donations too are very, very welcome in these austere times, as they say, as we’re loaning more money than ever across the planet.
At least we’re put down as guarantors to pay off the debts when they forgive them to the so-called Third World countries. And they’re going like crazy right now with the G-8, and I might touch on some of that tonight. We’re living in a vastly different world than the one that’s portrayed by television or media. Interesting enough, it’s always about forty, fifty years before anything that really happened in your lifetime is ever disclosed through official secrecy acts and declassified. Stuff like spraying you through the 50s, 60s, and 70s, with Cadmium and stuff like that. You know, it’s well hidden, massive projects over whole parts of Britain, and parts of the US as well. The big mosquito test they did with basically specially-created mosquitoes that they released in towns in the US in the 60s. People woke up in the morning and their houses were covered in these huge mosquitoes. That kind of stuff is never told to you at the time, just like the spraying in the air for the last, oh, since about ’98, pretty steadily, is not being discussed either. It will be long after you’re dead. And no one will care then, that’s why they tell you fifty years later. So, what we get really for news are mainly just distractions or exoteric reasons for what they seem to be doing, and it’s good enough for the general public. Even when it comes down to the Patriot Act, you’ll find that there’s really two Patriot Acts. There’s an exoteric one that they prattle on about in Congress, and then there’s the real esoteric one which only one Senator talked about, and he can’t disclose what it contains because it’s secret. So, that’s the world you’re really living in and you’re not allowed in on the big plan. You’re supposed to think things are just happening by happenstance, day by day. Back with more, after these messages.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. I’ve talked for years about how laws, once they’re on the books, really never come off. And even income taxes in some countries came out as temporary wartime taxes and they’re still with us today. And once they put a law on the books too, they tend to expand it. Once it’s on the books, there’s less prattle about how they’re going to expand it. They just go ahead and do it. It’s getting it on the books that’s important. And often, they’re very misleading, very Orwellian in Language. Some are more Orwellian too, like Patriot Act. I mean:
Patriot Act: three controversial provisions that Congress voted to keep
(Alan: That’s one of the headlines in the stories today. And the Patriot Act, you think about it, the US is a Republic, and in the speeches at the G8 and elsewhere, here’s your president talking about forcing democracy across the Middle East and Libya. It’s quite something to think about isn’t it? You have to bend your head around, and maybe your knees too. Anyway, this article here says:)
Congress had included sunset provisions in the USA Patriot Act to ensure that lawmakers revisited these measures. On Thursday, they extended three provisions for four years.
(A: It looks like it’s going to be permanently. It will be permanently. And you know it’s nothing to do with the War on Terror, it’s to do with the Terrorism to come, or at least the fear to come when people do riot, when they’re really into austerity, and the next stage of losing more homes and more homes goes on, and you find that you’re on food rationing if you can get any food at all, and the prices are going sky high. They’re really keeping them down artificially in the US, because the US is supplying most of the troops and the cash to fight all these wars right now. But once that job is over, believe you me, they’ll bring you up to the European stage, or down to I should say, of austerity, and it’s still going down everywhere else across Europe, so there’s a long way to catch up. So they’ll really need all these guys on the street with their machine guns and tapping phones and all that to make sure that they’re on top of it. That’s what it’s really, really for. And as you merge into not just into a New World Order, but you merge into the whole American continental region as they call it, that’s all part of it as well. And it’s such a cheat to talk about Patriotism when it suits them as they’re merging you into a continental new system. Anyway, it says:)
But in a rare meeting of minds, many liberals and some tea party activists opposed the bill on the grounds that it gives the government too much power and does not protect civil liberties.
The Senate passed the bill on Thursday 72 to 23, after working through objections by Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky.
The vote also cut across party lines in the House, where the measure passed on Thursday 250 to 153, with 31 Republicans and 122 Democrats voting in opposition.
On the Senate side, majority leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada blasted Senator Paul for putting the nation’s security at risk by delaying the bill.
(A: Security is at risk, right.)
Few laws have so consistently been associated with haste and fear as the USA Patriot Act, which first passed the Congress as ground zero still smoldered after the 9/11 attacks.
(A: Remember at the time too, Bush Jr. said it was unpatriotic if you read them, to the Congress. And I think it was only one or two of them that actually tried to read it. None of the rest of them even opened the book, so they were showing they were good patriots and doing what they were told.)
At the time, the Bush administration warned that new terrorist attacks could take place within days –
(A: They meant America was going to attack all over the planet, I think.)
and that if Congress did not grant government significant new powers of surveillance, lawmakers would be accountable for the attacks. The USA Patriot Act passed the Senate on Oct. 24, 2001, with just one dissenting vote, and later cleared the House by a vote of 357 to 66.
But Congress also included sunset provisions to ensure that lawmakers revisited these measures, outside such a climate of crisis. Over time, nearly all these sunset provisions have been made a permanent part of the law.
(A: Well, I’m really shocked about that one.)
Here are three provisions that Congress took up this week and extended for four years:
• Roving wiretaps. This provision gives intelligence officials authority to conduct surveillance on terrorist suspects
(A: Remember, they’re widely broadening their whole definition of terrorism now.)
regardless of how many communication devices they use (such as cellphones or the Internet). Approval for the surveillance must be obtained from a federal court. Law-enforcement agencies have been able to use wiretaps for criminal investigations since 1986.
• Business records. Another provision allows access to business records in cases involving terrorism, foreign intelligence, or espionage, with approval of a federal judge.
• Lone wolf. In 2004, Congress amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to authorize intelligence gathering on individuals not affiliated with any known terrorist organization, with a sunset date to correspond with the Patriot Act provisions. The provision, which is thus technically not part of the Patriot Act, is explicit in saying it does not to apply to US citizens.
(A: And they’ll probably have amendments on it to say, well, sometimes.)
On Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper wrote to congressional leaders warning that any lapse in the provisions of the law carried national security risks, especially following the killing of Osama bin Laden.
“The information obtained at the Osama Bin Laden compound (A: Which was a house, actually.) must be quickly analyzed
(A: They always say compound when they attack someone. I guess Obama goes home to his compound at night too, to have a cup of tea, or whatever he drinks.)
for any indications and warning of terrorist plots and attack plans,” he wrote. “As part of this effort we are using all our collection authorities to investigate and prevent terrorist attacks.”
But privacy groups say that Congress has never done a thorough investigation
(A: They’ve never done any investigation)
of how the law actually works, especially its impact on individual privacy rights.
(A: Well, we do know that you don’t have any.)
“Despite having months to debate and legislate on this crucial issue, Congress has once again chosen to rubberstamp the Patriot Act and its overreaching provisions,” said Laura Murphy, director of the Washington legislative office of the American Civil Liberties Union, in a statement. “Since its passage nearly a decade ago, the Patriot Act has been used improperly again and again by law enforcement to invade Americans’ privacy and violate their constitutional rights.”
So, it’s what you expected. It’s just routine now isn’t it? And it will be there permanently. Because, Americans and Canadians and a whole bunch of us have got to go through a whole lot more to get into the new system, which they call the New World Order. Interesting that Bush Sr. also said it was a new system of collective action. Now, that’s exactly the term that it was set up to do at the United Nations. They talk about collective action, collective security, and you also have collectivism, for your new Agenda 21 in your Communitarian areas. Collective action was where the UN could rubberstamp basically all the wars and tell all the nation members to go and attack whoever they didn’t like, or whoever was holding out from them, or wasn’t giving up their natural resources to them, because the bankers are really at the top of all this too, with the Royal Institute of International Affairs. These are the boys who set the whole system up.
So they’re on a roll now, and as I say, you always think of one level at a time working. You never realize that there’s two or three, maybe four levels of agendas working at the same time. So, as you’re finishing off the world to make it safe for supposedly democracy, which really means poverty, austerity, collectivism, and debt to international bankers, and then you’ve got the World Bank, the IMF and all the rest of it, and that’s what it really means, running under a kind of Sovietized system, you don’t realize that there’s another system above that going on at the same time, bringing the regions, the UN regions together like Europe is a region now, and America is classified as a region as well. I’ll touch on that tonight as well.
And just a little bit of trivia, for those who like trivia:
Unlabelled clone meat allowed on shop shelves as food safety proposals are ripped up
(A: It’s amazing what’s happening, isn’t it? The public just don’t count anymore, do they, at all? At one time, they used to, even politicians used to try and give long-winded speeches about what they were doing and why to fool you through much talking, but they don’t even bother anymore. They just say, ah, never mind the public, they won’t complain. And if they do, so what.)
Unlabelled clone meat allowed on shop shelves as food safety proposals are ripped up
Food from the offspring of cloned animals, including meat and milk, has been approved for sale without labels.
The Food Standards Agency yesterday tore up proposals that would have required it to go through a safety assessment.
(A: Well, who needs a safety assessment eh? We’re all going to die anyway, all the cancers from the GM foods, so it doesn’t matter.)
It comes despite research showing eight in ten shoppers oppose the cloning of farm livestock.
Shoppers will have no idea if meat has come from cloned animals after the Food Standards Agency approved its sale without labels
Unlabelled food produced using the offspring of clones, such as dairy products, meat pies and ready meals, can now go on sale without any threat of legal action.
But animal welfare groups say the cloning technique is cruel, with a high number of miscarriages, deformities and gigantism.
(A: And that’s true, when you see some of these videos of these things they’ve made, you know, these awful, poor looking creatures that can hardly stand up because their skeletal system isn’t designed to carry that kind of weight, that’s meant to go on this, for fast production of meat. And it’s just disgusting what they’re doing. But then, big money is behind it. And that’s what’s really driving it.)
The FSA’s decision is in line with Government policy, which supports clone farming and clone food without labels.
It says, that’s the government policy. The government is supporting clone farming and cloned food without labels. There’s just no regard for the public at all anymore. Just the government’s agenda. And who does the government kowtow to? Well, they kowtow to the GM producers and the guys that do the cloning, you know, and all the rest of it. This is the same in every country now. So, this is rushing ahead, and we’re just ignored now. I think probably, they know we’ll all die pretty shortly of one thing or another, if the radiation doesn’t get us from Japan.
Anyway, as we’re going into austerity, it’s just astonishing how much money you can borrow to hand out to other countries. And this is a thing that’s been going on since World War II, in all NATO countries especially, because in World War II, they set up these organizations, again, under the United Nations, the World Bank, the IMF, and the Bank for International Settlements. That’s a private group. They’re the biggie ones, who are really the bosses over the rest of them, by the way, according to Quigley. And the idea was that these countries would borrow the money from these banks, put the people down as collateral to pay them off, and then write off the debts if the folk couldn’t afford it, and give them another loan. We’ve been doing this for fifty, sixty years now. Back after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And just before I read this article on Foreign Aid here, which is all going to go to rebuilding the Middle East, of course, you know that too, for the oil companies, I’ll go to Ed in Washington if he’s still on the line. Are you there Ed?
Ed: Hi Alan, how are you?
Alan: Not too bad.
Ed: Good. I’m a first-time caller. Thank you very much for your educational efforts. I really appreciate it. On the durability of the Euro, it seems like the New World Order to a certain extent hangs on that. I’ve heard Bob Chapman talk about the Euro, and he thinks it will fall apart. You have another view. It seems like you’re on the other side of the spectrum. You’re, I don’t know, it sounds like you’re not too convinced the Euro will self-destruct because of the cultural differences and so on and so forth, and that’s basically the main question I wanted to ask you. And the second question would lead from that, follow from that, is, if the Euro fails, how much do you think that would, how much would that damage the New World Order?
Alan: Well, that’s just why it won’t fail. They cannot and will not let it fail. They’ll let everything else go down the tubes before they’ll ever, ever let their union fail. Don’t forget, they talked about the League of Nations setting up, and even before that, with the Cecil Rhodes and Milner groups in the late 1800s, they talked about setting up a joint Europe then. And that was their dedicated ambition for intergenerational work towards that. They’ve got what they wanted. And they will never let that fall apart. By force, if need be. It would take literally a war before, a war of the people, before they’ll ever, ever change anything or let it fail. They’ll let every other currency fail before they’ll do that. So it won’t happen. It’s impossible. They can’t. They’ve hung everything on this, this Union, and they’ve already gone ahead now, literally eradicating history across the whole of Europe, all history of conflicts or history of the past, etc. And so the young children are already being raised up with a whole new curriculum, a very vague history, where there’s no conflict at all, and they’re all just one big, happy family. That’s what they’ve been taught to believe. And the only ones who know this are the older ones who will die off anyway, and this is what, you’re living through an Intergenerational plan. And we tend to forget that all the time. You must always keep that uppermost in your mind, it’s intergenerational, and Karl Marx talked about the amalgamated Europe, and he talked about amalgamated America, and another one for the Far East. That’s all been pretty well accomplished. We’re still going through the transformation of joining the Americas today. Even Harper, Steven Harper of Canada, the prime minister, hasn’t disclosed to the politicians in Canada exactly what he signed, and what was going on when he went down to see Obama to do this integration. So, it’s all been kept very hush, hush and secretive. And I might touch on that tonight. But, no, they cannot let this fail. They’ll take the whole Europe down and destroy everybody before they’ll give up this dream, as they call it, their dream of the select few at the top. And it just won’t happen.
Now, back to this article here on Foreign Aid. It says:
British bill for foreign aid will be £8.7bn in 2011-2012, rising to more than £12bn in 2014
(A: As I say, they’re all meeting now, and eating well, over in France at the casino there, having a great old time to themselves to sign these, it’s basically all bills of lending to these countries, putting us all down as the guarantors to pay, and as we know, they always write off these debts of the so-called Third World. It’s actually going to build the new oil refineries and so on in the countries they’re taking over for the existing ones that they’ve taken over, countries like Iraq. We already paid for brand new refineries in Iraq, and then they had a big auction and handed it out as freebies to Exxon and all the big boys. Anyway it says, so:)
His decision led to Britain being branded the ‘soft touch’ of the international community by one of his own MPs.
(A: This is a country now that’s now really institutionalizing into its system the fact that thousands must die every year because they can’t afford fuel. But we can give all this cash abroad, and then write it off, and then pay off that too, to the International Bankers, when the country can’t afford to pay us back. And then, borrow more and give them another loan. This has been going on forever. And even after World War II, they set up the overseas economic development corporation, which is attached to your government. Every UN country that’s signatory has one. And that’s how they were doing it, through them. It wasn’t going to the poor people in the countries, it’s always been going to the big corporations, the international boys. Nothing has really changed. Just more money is going to them than ever before. It says in:)
And a damning report released at the G8 summit reveals that Britain spends more on aid as a percentage of national income than any other country in the world – while British taxpayers suffer through an age of austerity.
(A: That’s going to be generations of austerity. That’s what it’s going to be.)
The UK is spending exactly twice as much on foreign handouts as a share of Gross Domestic Product as the G8 average of the world’s leading economies.
And they’ve got the photographs and all, having a great old time in France and so on, these new Caligulas. I was going to mention too:
There’s a Secret Patriot Act, Senator Says
(A: It says here. This is on Wired Magazine. It says:)
You think you understand how the Patriot Act allows the government to spy on its citizens. Sen. Ron Wyden says it’s worse than you know.
Congress is set to reauthorize three controversial provisions of the surveillance law as early as Thursday.
Which is done. And I’ll touch on what he talks about in this article when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And Senator Ron Wyden says:
“We’re getting to a gap between what the public thinks the law says and what the American government secretly thinks the law says,” Wyden told Danger Room in an interview in his Senate office. “When you’ve got that kind of a gap, you’re going to have a problem on your hands.”
What exactly does Wyden mean by that? As a member of the intelligence committee, he laments that he can’t precisely explain without disclosing classified information. But one component of the Patriot Act in particular gives him immense pause: the so-called “business-records provision,” which empowers the FBI to get businesses, medical offices, banks and other organizations to turn over any “tangible things” it deems relevant to a security investigation.
“It is fair to say that the business-records provision is a part of the Patriot Act that I am extremely interested in reforming,” Wyden says. “I know a fair amount about how it’s interpreted, and I am going to keep pushing, as I have, to get more information about how the Patriot Act is being interpreted declassified. I think the public has a right to public debate about it.”
That’s why Wyden and his colleague Sen. Mark Udall offered an amendment on Tuesday to the Patriot Act reauthorization.
The amendment, first reported by Marcy Wheeler, blasts the administration for “secretly reinterpret[ing] public laws and statutes.” It would compel the Attorney General to “publicly disclose the United States Government’s official interpretation of the USA Patriot Act.” And, intriguingly, it refers to “intelligence-collection authorities” embedded in the Patriot Act that the administration briefed the Senate about in February.
Wyden says he “can’t answer” any specific questions about how the government thinks it can use the Patriot Act.
(A: In other words, they’ve already had discussions, again, secret discussions.)
That would risk revealing classified information — something Wyden considers an abuse of government secrecy. He believes the techniques themselves should stay secret, but the rationale for using their legal use under Patriot ought to be disclosed.
So, he goes on about how it’s spiked up on surveillance and all the rest of it, and yadda, yadda, ya. I don’t think anything will come to it, because they will never tell the public what they’re ever really actually up to. It’s always really been like that, by the way. That’s how it’s always really been everywhere in every country.
Now there’s Tom from Massachusetts on the line. Are you there, Tom? Hello, Tom.
Tom: Hello, how are you doing?
Alan: I’m hanging in here as always.
Tom: Well, that’s good. I’ve got a short question for you. I read somewhere, but I can’t remember where, but it says that our Federal Reserve System is actually patterned after the Office of the Exchequer in Great Britain. Is that correct?
Alan: Technically it is. The Exchequer is a throwover, a leftover from the Knights Templar, because they actually had an outside square in the Temple Bar area of London, in the City, where they marked out their debts and their loans on literally a draughts board, outside draughts board, massive thing. And they used these big long sticks to push the checkers around. And even today, the man in charge of the British Treasury is called the Chancellor of the Exchequer. That’s the shape of it, it’s an H, so they call it the H-Chequer. So they did pattern it after it, yeah.
Tom: Oh. And it goes back quite a while. I was doing some research on my own, and the office, well, the Department of the Exchequer is well, I guess the office too, would be dating back to probably close to, if not over, a thousand years.
Alan: Pretty well.
Tom: Well, this has been in effect for quite a while, and I can begin to see more of the tie in between the Anglo-American connection here and what bubbled over into the establishment of the Federal Reserve at the turn of the century. The influence of the...
Alan: Oh, massive influence. One good book to read was by Colonel Mandell House. And his title was honorary, but he had a big head and wanted a title so he gave himself a title. He worked for this Milner group by the way. He was one of the American representatives of the Milner group for World Government and to be under banking, by the way. That’s who the top boys are supposed to be, these international moneylenders. They’re not ordinary bankers. They literally lend to nations, private families a lot of them. And also, he came in, and he was the guy who pushed it. He drafted it up for Wilson and all the guys at Jekyll Island of course went across with them, and they signed it all into law. They always get a front man. Your presidents are nothing more than front men, and the same with Prime Ministers too. They get well rewarded for playing the game. But the idea was to bring in a central system, basically very much like Britain’s system, and you’ve noticed, even recently, they’ve made disclosures that the US has been, just like Britain, you’re lending money to other countries, as a government. Now, who ever gave the government the power to act as a bank on its own by lending money out, that’s your tax money, to other banks across the world? And of course, we find in World War I, just before the whole thing came to fruition for the Federal Reserve, they sent over the Warburg brother that had already put one of his brothers in America. He ended up being head of the Federal Reserve. And his brother in Germany ran the German system. So, through World War I, they kept the debts for both nations, and then after World War I, they did the reparations deals, they got together. So, here’s one on one side, using the money for Germany, and his brother was the one using it for American debt. I mean, what a con. And then of course, they’d also sent over Jacob Schiff, by Rothschilds. He was brought up by the Rothschild family in their home. And he also was a big part of it too, setting up some of the Federal Reserve Banks. So, it was all based from London. There’s no doubt about it.
Tom: Is there any connection between the Exchequer and the worldly setup of things, and why they would incorporate the religious aspect to it? For example, I think it was something mentioned about two times a year they’d have meetings, and one time would be at Easter and the other at Michaelmas.
Alan: That’s right. Old tradition. Ancient tradition. They love their traditions, there’s no doubt about it. I fact, it was the king at the time, when the Knights Templars were exposed in France for really being at that time one of the most powerful organizations on the planet, if not the most powerful; so powerful that they could, even though they were initially given a charter to exist by the Catholic Church, it was found out eventually they were taking so much land over across the whole of Europe. They’d even approach widows whose lords had died, the big knightly lords and get them to put their wills over to them. They were taking over estates all over Europe and Scandinavia, and they were also tax-free, by the way, like a tax-free foundation. And the Catholic Church was given the only exemption to be tax-free. Plus, they were also based in the Middle East, and they accumulated incredible fortunes, incredible fortunes, and they were eventually lending them out. They were the first ones to actually bring out a check, money in the form of a check, where you could deposit money in one bank in Britain say, in their bank, of course, the real gold, they gave you paper, and you’d go across to their Middle East areas and recoup it over there. So, these guys have been at this for an awful long time. And in England, the King even gave his treasury for safekeeping to the Templars, and that really was the beginning of the treasury, as they call it. They put it in their Treasury. And that’s the same one that the Exchequer still uses today.
Tom: Well, hey, thank you very much for the information, and keep up the good work, and I continue to look forward to your broadcast.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Tom: All right, we’ll see you.
Alan: And there’s Ali in England calling too. Are you there, Ali?
Ali: Hello. Hi. Peace be with you.
Alan: And the same to you too. We need more peace. We definitely need more peace, I agree.
Ali: Yeah. Yeah, I was basically calling you about the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations in America. I have a very close cousin to me, who’s actually recently become a senior fellow at the CFR. Basically, I was just ringing to ask you, what is the significance of that? I mean, is he just being used as a stooge to work for them? Or, is he very well aware of the real agenda of what’s actually going on?
Alan: If he’s a fairly new guy, a novice, he’ll go into the outer circle, they call it, you know. The outer circle. This is well explained in the book, Tragedy and Hope, and the Anglo-American Establishment, both by Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for them, for this organization. And he tells you that they bring newcomers in, sort of neophytes. They have so many think tanks all working on different areas of this global agenda that they often put them in as writers or as think tank members to work on certain problems across the globe, and then they’re tested and tested to see if they can really keep quiet. If they have special abilities, they’re brought up higher and higher, and then they get into, if they’re very lucky, very few do, into the higher, inner circle, and the inner circle meet at All Souls College at Oxford for life. They’re lifetime members. And there’s only about twenty of them allowed in there. There’s an exoteric side to it and an esoteric side to it. The novices generally write for their main magazines, like the Foreign Affairs magazine. Or else they write for their own websites. In fact they have huge websites now. So, I don’t think he’ll know too much about what they’re really up to at his level. But certainly even being attached to them means that you’re guaranteed to get up the ladder pretty quickly in any endeavor that you happen to pick on the side.
Ali: Yeah, I mean, he’s been coming on television, American television, on the news, discussing foreign policy in the Middle East and Northern Africa particularly around the so-called revolutions that are taking place over there. I mean, he’s coming on. He’s basically, you know, pushing their agenda.
Alan: Oh, he will have to. See, you can’t join it. You can’t actually say, I’d like to join this organization. You must be asked to join it, which means they’ve already been watching you.
Ali: Yeah. I mean, he was, you know, a pretty successful author over here in the UK. His book was obviously picked up. I mean, books don’t really become best-sellers unless they’re made to become best-sellers, right?
Alan: That’s right.
Ali: And he was a very successful author here, and it’s obvious that he’s obviously been picked up by these people.
Alan: And it will all depend what they have in store for him, depending how he can. You understand that they have a whole bunch of agendas on the go, but they’re always the same agendas as they go into other nations. And at the same time, they’ve got agendas back home, giving us an opposite story, or the wrong story of why they’re going into other nations. But the tactics are always the same. It’s to destroy what’s left of family units, the culture, the religion, and rebuild everything on the new so-called democratic system, which, as you well know, is not democratic at all. But you must always bring into all your writings as an author. Canada and Britain are famous for this, because most of the authors over there get funds from and grants from governments to write, but you must write about feminism, that must be included, you must have all the PC things written inside the story in the novels, to get the grants, and they all comply with that. They’re shameless prostitutes. That’s why they get picked for these things.
Ali: Yeah. And I just have one quick question as well. These people who get picked up to work for these organizations like the CFR, are they also part of any secret societies?
Alan: Well, they’re often encouraged to become, if they’ve not already become a member of, generally, basic Freemasonry to start with. That’s the foot in the door of the general societies, and then they go into higher societies, if they’re worthy as they say, to go into the higher societies.
Ali: Yeah. My cousin, he’s actually joined these people. He’s recently actually become a Sufi; and I know that there are high levels of Sufis, and it’s actually part of the secret societies, isn’t it, part of the mystery schools, if I’m not mistaken? And so, do you have to join one particular secret society, such as the Masons, or can it be other secret societies like the Sufis?
Alan: They can bring you in from any one of them, but eventually they bring you into general Masonry too, that accepts them from all the other societies. And that’s what they say, it’s a brotherhood of the world. And they don’t talk religion, any of the usual religions, put it that way, in their lodge; they are talking a religion. And many of the new members don’t even realize that initially, but there’s definitely a religion there that they’re talking about.
Ali: Yeah, and just one quick question. What is the meaning of the crescent, because I see it on all these Islamic Flags, and I know it’s something to do with the mystery schools and the mystery religions, but what is the meaning of it?
Alan: The meaning of their symbols?
Ali: The crescent.
Alan: Oh, the crescent. The crescent, it has different meanings. In the ancient Middle East, it was also, apart from being the New Moon, it was also called the Nasi. They like the word Nasi. And they play so much on the word Nasi. It means head as well. And so it’s a head. And they used to love the time of the year, especially the mid-winter solstice or Christmas time. Even long before that, even in Egyptian times, they would have that symbol especially when Venus was in between the horns, in alignment with the belt of Orion. That was one of their highest symbols, and it only happens once every so often. That’s one of their main symbols for the birth of their system. It’s also for the birth of something new coming out of the womb as well, or out of their own head, as they often say. It’s got that on one of the levels. There’s other levels of meaning too, but it would take a long time to explain them all. That’s why they love the NSA, na-sa, it’s the same thing, and NASA, and so on.
Ali: Well, that’s kind of interesting. Well, thanks for your help. May peace be with you.
Alan: And be with you too. Bye now, thanks for calling. Talking about the integration here, here’s one site I’ll put up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and it’s one of these funded nongovernmental organizations, not-for-profit organizations, that are all funded by the big multi-trillion dollar foundations.
The North American Model Legislature
(A: And it says, who are they? They’re called FINA-NAFI)
The North American Forum on Integration (NAFI) is a non-profit organization
(A: This is only one of many now, all funded by the same foundations.)
based in Montreal. NAFI, created in 2002, aims to address the issues raised by North American integration as well as identify new ideas and strategies to reinforce the North American region.
(A: Under the UN, remember, they’re all called regions.)
Over the first two years of its existence, NAFI organized conferences which brought together government and academic figures as well as business people.
(A: That’s what they use. They don’t bother with the general population. It’s just academia and government and business.)
The first conference organized by NAFI, entitled “Beyond Free Trade: Strengthening North America” was held in Montreal in March 2003. This conference was attended by 280 people, as well as prominent conference speakers. The second NAFI conference took place in April 2004 in Monterrey (Mexico)
(A: It’s great how these little poor guys with tin cans can get around to all these exotic places.)
and focused on North American energy resources, as well as the creation of a North American energy fund. About 200 participants and conference speakers took part in the conference, among which the former Energy Minister, Mr. Felipe Calderon.
And I’ll talk more about this when we get back from this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And, to go on with this article here, from this non-profit organization for the integration of the Americas. It says:
Making the academic world, the public and decision-makers aware of the challenges posed by integration between the three NAFTA countries;
(A: That’s their objectives. And also:)
Identifying the elements of the North American agenda which would allow the consolidation and reinforcement of the North American region;
Favoring the creation of North American networks to set the basis for a trilateral dialogue.
So, that’s one. And then I’ll put one up too. It’s called ALIPAC. And it’s got a lot of the data on the integration stuff that’s been going on over the years that they’ve kept quiet from the general public. And it says.
A secret document recently released by WikiLeaks
(A: And I mentioned that last week.)
reveals a high level US ambassador promoting a merger of the United States, Canada, and Mexico into one combined consumer and labor market,
(A: Just like the European Union, remember, because that’s the old agenda.)
with a common currency and a mutual electronic security perimeter with less focus on physical borders.
The secret documents reveal a well-developed plan that advocates secrecy, an incremental approach as not to alarm the public. The document clearly states, that the plan is to prevent US efforts to protect citizens from terrorism or disease from interfering with commerce and other financial interests. The documents also advocate that promotion of this plan focus on "individual firms, industries or travelers, and especially consumers" instead of the nations as a whole.
(A: That’s how they did it with the European Union. They kept saying it would make it easier for travelers, or easier for industries, but they never said we’re integrating you completely. You see, that was the whole game of it.)
This high level leak appears to validate earlier concerns by many groups of plans to create a new government, which would supersede the sovereignty of America, Canada, and Mexico in a way similar to the European Union. Critics of these merger plans call the plan the North American Union. Supporters of the plan call it the North American Community or North American Integration (NAI).
(A: Like that last site, I just read.)
"It is conspiracy, but it is no theory," said William Gheen of ALIPAC. "These traitors are trying to conceal their plans, but they are out in the open now. They are trying to force an economic union on America that is not ratified by the US Congress, not authorized by the US Constitution, and not approved of by the American public. This plan is being facilitated by the non-enforcement of our existing immigration and border laws."
So, it goes on and on and on. A lot of data. A lot of documents you can go into to read about it too. It’s been ongoing. As I say, remember, there’s always three or four things going on at the same time. Three levels of things. One, they’ll use a national level: America is at war with the world to save ourselves and the patriotism. And the second level: It’s to spread democracy across the whole world. And the third level: You’re getting integrated into something for the future. It’s almost here, in fact, and you’ll see it shortly in your lifetime. So, there’s always different things going on at the same time. The public are always fooled. That’s the whole intention of it. And it will be done the same way as Europe, until one day you’ll wake up and you’ve got a Parliament for the Americas, which was, by the way, discussed at the very first Free Trade Negotiations, back in the 80s. They mentioned they might set it up in Montreal. So there you go. Nothing really changes. It’s one agenda. Never forget that. There’s one agenda on the go, and it’s definitely the same boys behind it. They have been for well over a hundred years now, and even before that they had different names, even when Winston Churchill talked about it, he was so confused. He didn’t realize who they were, because he knew all the names but he didn’t realize it was all one association. They were so secretive about what they were doing with the Milner Group that became the Royal Institute for International Affairs.
Getting back to that little symbol of the New Moon, remember too, in the Soviet flag, which didn’t come from the Russian people at all, you’ll see a little star just off the top horn of the moon as well. It’s very significant that little star. From Hamish and myself, Hamish is my dog, by the way, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
Secret Patriot Act--Senator Says
Patriot Act Rubberstamped as the "New Normal"
The Cloned Meat Non-Debate
UK Doles Out More Foreign Aid than Any Other Country
G-8 Big Banks and Cash to Arabian Countries
North American Integration Forum
North American Merger
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)