May 19th, 2011 (#836)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 19th, 2011:
The Con of Politics, Rather Shoddy,
Left and Right Live Off Same Body:
"Whether Right or Left, Both Play the Game,
For Control Over Masses, The Means is the Same,
Both Elites Aspire to Live High on the Hog,
From Sweat and Labour of the Underdog,
The Techniques to Victory I'm Sure You'll See,
Are for Elites to Inbreed, Become "Pedigree",
As Generations Pass, Then Every Daughter
Will Swoon at the Pomp, In Ignorance of Slaughter,
With Revised History and Books Turning to Dust,
Rich Winners are Worshipped, In Cash We Trust"
© Alan Watt May 19th, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – May 19th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on May the 19th, 2011. I will start off the broadcast by advising newcomers to look into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and bookmark all the sites I’ve got listed there. These are all the official sites I have. They all carry a lot of audios of the shows I’ve done over the years and carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks too, for print up. And if you want transcripts in other languages, remember to go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, which will give you a variety to choose from.
Remember too, you’re the audience who bring me to you. If you want me to keep going, then you can help to support me by buying the books and discs I have for sale on the .com site. You can use a personal check from the US to Canada. You can also use an international postal money order to Canada. You can use cash. You can also use PayPal. Use the Donation button on the .com site, and follow it with an email, with your name, address, and order, and I’ll get it out to you. Across the rest of the world, same idea. You’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and you’ve got PayPal again to order, using the donation button. Remember, straight donations are definitely welcome, because everything, as we all know, is skyrocketing, as we go into inflation. It’s amazing how Canada is so tied at the hip with the US, and the cost of living has always been higher here anyway with more taxes and value added taxes they call GST here, and various other hidden taxes. We’re certainly going into inflation as well, along with the US, tied at the hip. So, that’s just the way it is.
What I try to do on this broadcast is to bring you a much bigger picture, rather than get you off into emotional anger and so on. And that’s generally what articles put out in mainstream media is meant to do to you, give you something to titillate you for the day, and make you angry for the day, or indignant, or kind of blasé or whatever. You’re left with your opinion. And they flood us with lots and lots of stories, many of which you’ll never remember in a few days time anyway. So, I try to pick the ones that are relevant really to the big world system that’s coming into view. It’s already here, technically. The rest of it will get bashed into place through carbon taxes and fanatical scientists that are on the gravy train as they call it of big salaries, as they warp facts and figures to suit their theories, because they must get world government through. It must be based on saving the planet. And it must be based on every child being taught that we’re all to blame for causing it. That’s the whole idea behind this big socialist type run system, run by the fascists at the top, or owned by the fascists at the top. Because that’s what it is.
And I laugh when I read the left wing and the right wing stories, because, regardless of the changes in government, the same treaties that have been signed for the last fifty years with the United Nations, just continue, as they go deeper and deeper into more and more treaties that bind us all together. The politicians do musical chairs. They’re all appointees. Basically, once they’re in, they get appointed to different positions they know nothing about, in fact. What do lawyers know about any of these positions they get put into? And then they do musical chairs with them, like Canada is very famous for doing musical chairs, where you can be in charge of the health system one day, and maybe a week or two later in charge of the military. So, bureaucrats, the top-level bureaucrats run this show, really, on behalf of the masters who own the banking system and etc. And you know, that’s what Winston Churchill said, he said, to fight Hitler, we’ve got to copy his tactics, he has the bureaucrats on his side. And that’s how the world is really, really run. The politicians come and go. They fill their pockets from the lobbyists. And they give out the contracts and get their kickbacks. And technically, they’re not people you want to mix with anyway. They’re basically low-level psychopaths. And when you get their histories, generally after election, you find out just how much debt they’re into already, how many scams they’ve pulled, how many bankruptcies they’ve been through, and now they’re in the big honey pot. They’re allowed to scam so much honey out of the pot, as long as they don’t go too far with it. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And I’m going to touch on the global warming nonsense that’s the religion they’ve created, the Greening Religion. Gorbachev, remember said years ago in one of his books, he said, we are in the process of creating a new type of Earth Worship, he says, based around basically, sustainability and so on. He’s a top socialist himself. And he still goes around the world giving speeches under a Socialist banner, basically. He mentioned that this will have to be a kind of Green Religion, he said, years before we heard the terms used. And so, he was in on the know, of course, by those who really put him in place to do what he’s doing with all the rest of them. And of course, what he also meant too, is that it would be taught as a religion, in the school system. And it certainly is, and has been for a while now, too. And it’s even amazing how much stuff they put into movies, and even comedies to do with it; just repetition is all you need to reinforce the basic premise. Basic scientific, psychological ploy that they use. And it’s always worked very well. And eventually actually, once they get what they want, it doesn’t matter what lies they use to get it through. And they will. It’s the same with wars too. Lies are used to get wars started on all sides. And propaganda is used, massively. And it doesn’t matter, they’ll just get public support behind them to get it started. Once it’s started, it doesn’t matter if it’s found out or not. That’s standard again, when you read the various military manuals that they have. They must get the war going, get the public behind them, and then, if they found out later it’s all been a set-up, or the governments have lied to them, it doesn’t matter, they say, we can’t pull out now because the country we’ve invaded will fall into chaos. Even though it’s already bombed into chaos, it will fall into chaos with no law, etc.
And it’s the same with all the other lies that they tell you as well. Once this big scam of global warming is rammed through, under the United Nations, to put the United Nations above all the other nations, remember, this is the whole goal of the United Nations, they’ll be able to dictate to every country how much carbon they’re allowed to produce and so on and so on and so on. And it’s a farce, because we’re carbon-based life forms and everything else on the planet is as well, that lives. That doesn’t matter. Reality doesn’t matter when it comes to creating a form of religion in order to get another agenda through. It’s very much like the Marxists used to say too, and they would teach their students, even in Canada, get into politics, by any means possible. Take any party you want, just get in there. Lie, lie, lie, and get in. Once you’re in, then you can do what you want. And Pierre Trudeau took that to heart, because he was actually a member of the Comintern, as far back as the 1950s when he led the delegation from Canada, off to Moscow, representing the Comintern for Canada.
Anyway, no one wants to know this stuff basically these days, because we’re taught that new is good. It’s like everything else that you buy. It must be new or it’s no use. I mean, like a week old is old, isn’t it? Same with history and so on. And those who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it. There’s no doubt in that at all. That’s why the same cons work over and over and over again. And even Plato said that too. You can introduce the same, he basically meant a con, to control the public, over again, if the public have been made to accept it in the past, you must know the formula, how it was introduced. If you introduce it in the same way, it doesn’t matter in what time you reintroduce it, the public will behave in the same way and adapt to it in the same way too. Old stuff, and again, we’re managed by sciences which are very, very old, and the sciences are kept really for a much higher elite than the ones who attend most universities. And that’s the way it really is, like Bertrand Russell said. Anyway, it says:
Former “alarmist” scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) (Alan: That’s man-made global warming) is based in false science
David Evans is a scientist. He has also worked in the heart of the AGW machine. He consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (A: You’d think that’s somewhere where you grow leeks or something, eh?) (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modeling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. He has six university degrees, including a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. The other day he said:
The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, (A: Because they’re awfully well paid.) understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic.
And with that he begins a demolition of the theories, premises and methods by which the AGW scare has been foisted on the public.
(A: And then it goes into the politics of it, because everything is political, isn’t it? It says:)
The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s. But the gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome. (A: Now, here’s a top player, verifying what I said at the beginning.) too many jobs, industries, trading profits, (A: That’s the carbon trading schemes the big boys have got.) political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control (A: Total. Go to the dictionary and look up total. And control.) riding on the outcome. So rather than admit they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now outrageously maintain the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
He makes clear he understands that CO2 is indeed a “greenhouse gas”, and makes the point that if all else was equal then yes, more CO2 in the air should and would mean a warmer planet. But that’s where the current “science” goes off the tracks. It is built on an assumption that is false.
(A: And what is the science?)
But the issue is not whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much.
Most scientists, on both sides, also agree on how much a given increase in the level of carbon dioxide raises the planet’s temperature, if just the extra carbon dioxide is considered. These calculations come from laboratory experiments; the basic physics have been well known for a century.
(A: And what actually happens is if the planet warms for a few years, you’ll find that the sea will warm, it lags afterwards, and when you’re cooling, that’s when the sea is still warm and is giving off carbon dioxide. Anyway it says:)
The disagreement comes about what happens next.
The planet reacts to that extra carbon dioxide, which changes everything. Most critically, the extra warmth causes more water to evaporate from the oceans. But does the water hang around and increase the height of moist air in the atmosphere, or does it simply create more clouds and rain? Back in 1980, when the carbon dioxide theory started, no one knew. The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas.
(A: In fact, most greenhouse gas is moist air.)
But it didn’t increase the height of the moist air around the planet as subsequent studies have shown since that time. However, that theory or premise became the heart of the modeling that was done by the alarmist crowd.
(A: So, the modeling is this, from the scientists.)
This is the core idea of every official climate model: For each bit of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three bits of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of three — (A: So, these climate models, they’re specially-made computers and so on. So:) two-thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (and other factors); only one-third is due to extra carbon dioxide.
That’s the core of the issue. All the disagreements and misunderstandings spring from this. The alarmist case is based on this guess about moisture in the atmosphere, and there is simply no evidence for the amplification that is at the core of their alarmism.
What did they find when they tried to prove this theory?
Weather balloons had been measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10 kilometres up, as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above. During the warming of the late 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, the weather balloons found no hot spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves that the climate models are fundamentally flawed, that they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.
This evidence first became clear around the mid-1990s.
Evans is not the first to come to these conclusions. Earlier this year, in a post I highlighted, Richard Lindzen said the very same thing.
(A: And Lindzen said:)
For warming since 1979, there is a further problem. The dominant role of cumulus convection in the tropics requires that temperature approximately follow what is called a moist adiabatic profile. This requires that warming in the tropical upper troposphere be 2-3 times greater than at the surface. Indeed, all models do show this, but the data doesn’t (A: So, the models and the computers all show it, but the actual factual data doesn’t.) and this means that something is wrong with the data. It is well known that above about 2 km altitude, the tropical temperatures are pretty homogeneous in the horizontal so that sampling is not a problem. Below two km (roughly the height of what is referred to as the trade wind inversion), there is much more horizontal variability, and, therefore, there is a profound sampling problem. Under the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that the problem resides in the surface data, and that the actual trend at the surface is about 60% too large.
(A: So, surface data will always give you a 60% higher reading.)
Even the claimed trend is larger than what models would have projected but for the inclusion of an arbitrary fudge factor due to aerosol cooling. The discrepancy was reported by Lindzen (2007) and by Douglass et al (2007). Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data.
(A: We found that out with the leaked emails and so on. A small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data. And he said earlier, global governance is riding on this. And total control. That’s over everything. You, everything. Anyway:)
Evans reaches the natural conclusion – the same conclusion Lindzen reached:
At this point, official “climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.
And it goes on and on, but I’ll put this up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, after the broadcast. Back in a moment.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And sometimes being a spook, a spook as I call them, spies, spooks, it’s a shady world of spookdom. I call it spookdom, because you never know who’s who. Even a lot of the spooks don’t know who the other spooks are, or, if they do, they don’t know if they’re double spooks, double agents or triple agents, or whatever they are, because most of the spooks have no real qualms of accepting cash from other countries, or whatever. I mean, that’s just the way they are. It’s interesting, the whole idea of spookdom, in fact, because, I remember reading an article where an RCMP undercover cop went into biking gangs, and he actually got more bonded with the gang members than he did with the guys in the RCMP. He thought they were more reliable to help you out in trouble than his own mates in the RCMP. Anyway, getting off the subject.
This is about a spook, he was set out. I’ve mentioned for years now, since 9/11 happened, after listening to one of the first BBC broadcasts on sting operations, where they would hire people from within Muslim communities to act as ring leaders to stir up angst against Britain on the internet, and so on, and get away with it all, saying nasty things, and again, get away with it. And young, impressionable guys would probably get in on the act too, and they’d make a hero out of him. He’d set them up in collusion with the governmental authorities, and then in would come the operation to sting them with bomb-making equipment or whatever. The same thing happened in Canada a few years ago, and the guy who actually set up the sting was working for CSIS, that’s the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and the RCMP, and he actually appeared afterwards, kind of quite happy about himself. Chuffed you’d call it. Very chuffed looking, for having done his bit, dressed in his traditional garb and all the rest of it. I think this is the same guy the article is about. It’s from the CBC Canada. It says:
Mubin Shaikh probably understands better than most what inclusion in the cable means. (A: A cable basically was sent from the Canadian Security Intelligence Services and the RCMP to the US Security Services. And his name was on it. His name was on the list of these suspected terrorists. And it says:) It is a list of people provided by Canada's intelligence agency to the U.S. government — people suspected of what CSIS calls "terrorist-related activity."
The names are now in American databases and watch-lists, with all the consequences that entails.
Along with Shaikh, the secret cable, provided to CBC News by WikiLeaks, names all the people originally arrested in the infamous Toronto 18 case in 2006, some of whom went on to prison on terrorism-related charges.
(A: This is the young guys that this guy helped sting. And it says:)
Shaikh knows the other names on the list well. He was the man who put them away.
A Muslim and Canadian citizen, Shaikh was recruited in 2004 as what CSIS calls a "directed source" — someone assigned to penetrate groups and cells suspected of planning violent attacks. (A: Now, in Britain, they actually admitted at the top that they were creating the groups that didn’t exist by putting these guys out in front, who are very, very vocal, who would attract admirers, especially young men, basically, who are easily impressed by it. Anyway:) He had volunteered his services after returning to Canada from Syria, where he'd lived for two years.
In 2005, once he'd determined that a large group in Toronto was plotting serious attacks, the case, along with Shaikh, was handed by CSIS over to the Mounties, who launched a criminal investigation.
Shaikh became an official, paid agent of the Crown and continued his undercover work for the RCMP, until they rounded up and charged the 18 alleged conspirators.
At that point, Shaikh became the Crown's star witness, testifying in five different criminal proceedings that sent several people to prison.
"It was his evidence that took them all down," Alberta lawyer Dennis Edney told CBC Wednesday night. Edney represented Fahim Ahman, a ringleader who eventually pleaded guilty and remains in prison.
"Most of the warrants for wiretaps that were obtained were obtained as a result of conversations he had with the suspects."
Shaikh proved himself nearly bulletproof to attempts by defence lawyers to discredit him.
There is no doubt of his value to Canadian authorities, or to the Canadian justice system.
And now, described to the Americans by his former employers as "involved in the Toronto 18 conspiracy," he is in at least three American counterterrorism databases, and knows he would be ill-advised to attempt travel to the United States.
(A: So, basically, they’ve turned over his name as well, the guy that they’d recruited to sting other people. He says:)
"I understand the consequences," he says.
Inclusion in the so-called Visa Viper watch list, (A: So, it’s called Visa Viper.) to which he was nominated by the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa in September 2009 (and the cable indicates he'd already been placed on another U.S. watch-list), means his name would also have been sent to the wider database of the American National Counterterrorism Centre. And possibly beyond, to other intelligence agencies, some of them rather unsavory, with whom the U.S. government shares intelligence.
(A: How can your government share intelligence with unsavory characters, as it bombs across the world to bring this open democracy?)
"This is just the tip of the iceberg," says Shaikh. "I think someone's got some explaining to do. It just doesn't make any sense, really."
(A: Anyway, CSIS has nothing to say about it. And you don’t expect them to say anything, anyway.)
The story, however, has nothing to do with Foreign Affairs and everything to do with CSIS, which had claimed to CBC News earlier this week that it was a careful, responsible steward of information about Canadians.
Anyway, the leak got out and the guy’s on a banned list, so he can’t go to the US now. And if he’s wise, he wouldn’t go abroad now either. Well, that’s the price of being a spook, I guess, isn’t it? Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back, and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And as we go down this path into the chaos that’s all planned, we’re really in the chaos, as a war is going on, mind you, a world war is going on, right now, a war to change not just countries across the planet, but to merge countries too, into blocs, and also to put it all also under auspices of the United Nations, eventually. Very old plan, going back to the 1800s, and Karl Marx even talked about it, and maybe used a bit different terms. He talked about a global governance and all that kind of stuff, and trading blocs that would be under this global governmental system. On the way to it of course we have all these hassles now of finishing off the last few countries that are different from everybody else, in that they have a religion which is also part of the way that they govern. It’s all through their society.
And the UN of course, when it started up, said they’d take all peoples in with their present governmental systems, and they weren’t prejudiced and so on. And really, since George Bush Jr. was in, we had the New American Century, with Revolutionary Democracy, where they’d invade countries and force democracy on them. So they changed all their tactics, but then, they always lie at the top, don’t they, as to what they’re really after. They always do that, you know, to get along. And it’s the same thing with finishing off the Middle East, because every country that they’ve been using the soft power, they’ve been funding the internal revolutions, and then filling it up or backing it up with military strikes from NATO and so on, every country has been taken down practically, except the last couple, including Iran. And they’re really at it now with Iran. The same list that they came out with in the early 90s from the New American Century group, is the same list they’re going through today. And this article here is from Press TV. It says:
The Israeli lobby in the US is pushing President Barack Obama to go to war with Iran and the Middle East countries need “to be on guard about this [plot],” says a political analyst.
“Israel lobby AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] is pushing for confrontation with Iran,” James Morris told Press TV in an interview on Thursday.
Morris said it was worrying that Obama's National Security Advisor Tom Donilon has called on the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs to take stronger actions against Iran.
The analyst added that neo-conservatives in the US are also plotting against Syria
(A: Well, forget the Neo-Conservatives, because they’re all exactly the same following. Even Rumsfeld congratulated Obama on following the same list, basically. Anyway:)
plotting against Syria since Damascus supports the Lebanese resistance movement of Hezbollah.
“What is happening in Syria with the protests...I think the neo-cons through the National Endowment for Democracy (A: That was that Revolutionary Democracy group.) have been involved with this, perhaps in terms of rabble-rousing in Syria,“ Morris said.
“They want to create strife there [in Syria] and get President Barack Obama to intervene like he did in Libya,” he said.
Morris urged the Middle East countries to be vigilant against US and Israel's plots in the region.
“The only thing I can say is to be ready for more war...It is all part of a plan to get an eventual war for Israel against Iran and Syria and the region really has to be on guard about this... We just have to watch out for that.”
Now a few years ago, they had all that stuff from the Israeli press too, when Bush was in, because they came up with the same list that the New American Century group in the US had come up with, with the few countries to be taken down, and even the order that they were to be taken down on too. So, we’re just going through an agenda and a script. And most of the big things that happen on the planet are all just part of this big script. You get rather bored when you know it all, and you’ve read and studied it all, and you can remember most of it. You get kind of bored, kind of going through day by day, watching these things come into view and happen. And it’s all a mystery when it happens again, even though it’s been written about years ago.
And Russia, here’s another one too, Russia. The US is now starting to put missiles in all the countries around Russia, which is not a nice thing to do if you’re trying to make peace you know, and so, Russia is giving out warnings now. It says:
On Wednesday, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned that his country would take “retaliatory measures” if the United States would continue with the construction of the so-called missile defense system, AFP reported.
“We [Russia] would then be talking about developing the offensive potential of our nuclear capabilities; this would be a very bad scenario. It would be a scenario that throws us back into the Cold War era,” the Russian president said during a press conference.
Medvedev warned of an early pull out from the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), if the deployment of the missile shield would go forward in the absence of Russia.
So, they always say that the countries, all countries, technically, it doesn’t matter if it’s Socialist or Fascist, are all Fascist by nature. And Fascism goes down at the end in exactly this way, where they can only exist on war. And then, when everything is conquered, what do they do then? What do they do? You can’t just plunder and plunder and plunder countries, when you’re making nothing back home except bombs and drones and all this kind of stuff. Well, we’ll live through this, don’t worry, as we all go down the tubes into poverty, which they call austerity.
Anyway, also, the FBI is really on about domestic terror. They’ve got to find terror everywhere, obviously, to justify all the thousands and thousands and multi-thousands of jobs they’ve created under Homeland Security. You cannot create even a police force if there’s no crime. Eventually they start laying off members. Any system you set up in bureaucracy has to multiply itself and then prove how necessary it is to the system by finding crime, or whatever, or bringing in more cash, or getting cops on the streets to ticket people. Whatever it is. And then they try to justify and rationalize why you need them. So, not much is happening in the way of a domestic terror threat right now. And it says:
The FBI considers them one of the nation’s top domestic terror threats. (A: This group, and it’s the sovereign citizen’s movement. It says, it includes here:) Their members include cop killers and a convicted Oklahoma City bomber. They call themselves “sovereign citizens,” and have taken various measures to fight the U.S. government. But now, the government is fighting back.
Sovereign citizens are a loosely organized group of people who claim they are not subject to government laws. Estimates suggest there are as many as 300,000 sovereign citizens in the U.S. Sovereign citizens have been known to oppose taxes, file liens against public officials, sign documents with a red thumbprint, and use homemade license plates.
Some sovereign citizens focus on the role of government, a relatable, much-debated issue in the U.S. Alfred Adask told “60 Minutes,” "I think the government has gone far beyond its Constitutional limits.” The problem is where they draw the line. Adask once said, “We have the right to keep and bear arms in order to shoot our own politicians."
(A: And that is what Franklin and others actually mentioned to do with the right to bear arms.)
The violence used by some sovereign citizens is cause for serious concern.
Anyway, this is an article by 60 Minutes, so you know the spin that will be on it, anyway, and where it’s to go. But it’s true, if you have no right of free speech, you know, then what do you back it up with? And that’s why they had them written in that manner in the Constitution, which now is a terrorist document, if you read it. So, anyway, that’s just how, the way things go.
And again, too, I can remember reading a long, long time ago, of, I don’t know if it was Aristotle that said it, but it was one of the old philosophers, but he talked about the brutality that was used to civilize a country. He says, civilization is a very brutal process, as they went plundering in those days to grab the loot and the resources and stuff from other countries. Always under the guise of bringing them civilization. The Romans carried on that torch after them, and it’s still going on today.
But, to see the Queen going to Southern Ireland, or to Ireland, I should say, and parade around there, being greeted, where you can’t even fly the flag, by the way, the Irish flag, it’s upset a lot of people, because there’s a long history in Ireland of incredible suffering and slaughter as well, going all the way back to Queen Elizabeth I. And they were using Ireland as a breadbasket. Many of the ancient ministers as they call them, around the Monarchy, actually referred to Ireland as the Breadbasket that would feed the British and all the troops abroad for the empire and stuff like that. And they actually did that too. They looted the country and actually caused the famine. People think that the people just lived on potatoes. Absolute nonsense. At that time, there was more exports out of Ireland going on than ever before. And they were getting enforced at the point of the Queen’s military at that time. Anyway, I’ve got two or three articles here, and one is about the flag itself:
Police seizing and destroying Irish flags for queen’s visit under injust legislation
Independent Journalist “Madam K” (A: Her name is.) was stopped at a newly erected police barrier in Dublin today during the visit of the German/pseudo-English Queen Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Wettin. (A: That’s really Prussian, a Prussian name.) The garda told her that “under the warrant you cant have a flag at the moment!”
(A: So, this reporter wasn’t allowed to carry a flag with her, even in her purse, you know.)
The act she referenced was the Public Order Act Section 21. It states “indicate that to proceed beyond the barrier (A: Everyone was going through barriers, you know, these electronic barriers and magnetic resonance stuff, to see what you’re carrying on you.) while in possession of any intoxicating liquor, disposable drinks container or offensive article will render such liquor, container or article liable to confiscation.”
The bit she means is the “offensive article”.
That’s what we’re reduced to in this country. There was probably a tricolour flying as that bangarda took an oath to “serve her county” *ahem* and now she’s reduced to confiscating them for the Royals.
(A: So, in other words, the cops confiscated her flag, even though it wasn’t listed on any of the stuff under Section 21. Not to offend the Queen, you see, who must be kept under the illusion that she still rules the world, I suppose. Anyway, there’s that, and then there’s another article on the state dinner menu for the Queen’s visit there. And it’s all to be paid for by the taxpayers of Ireland. They’re awfully nice people. And it says:)
State Dinner Menu for Britain’s Queen Paid for With Irish Taxpayer’s Money Whilst Poverty Striken Irish (A: That have just been, remember, looted by the banks even worse than some other countries. That’s why their:) Citizens Get AUSTERITY!-
I make no apology for my disgust of this creature who has been invited, to soil the soil of Ireland by her presence, by a traitorous and corrupt political elite so that she may lord it over her Irish peasantry who she believes she owns. (A: And this is from Neil Foster. It says:) And by the way RTE…. Get it right… this witch is only the ‘queen’ of ENGLAND, if even that!
(A: It’s interesting too, if you look at the modern definition of England, it doesn’t exist. It’s really under Britain. No kidding, look at some of the big modern dictionaries. It says:)
Take a look at the menu for these parasites to stick their eugenicist snouts in at the expense of the beleaguered Irish taxpayer who has been given Draconian austerity measures to impoverish them further.
It really does make me feel sick to the stomach to watch this despotic family walk the streets of Dublin, and with contempt endemic in her family history for the people of Ireland, dare lay wreaths of poppies to ‘commemorate’ Irish Freedom Fighters, who died fighting her family’s despotism, whilst her own gullible military are losing their lives protecting the same opium trade which built her family’s evil British empire.
(A: And that’s a truth there. They still own the opium trade.)
What is wrong with people that they haven’t turned out in their tens of thousands to express utter contempt for this display of maximum arrogance and effrontery to the memory of those killed in the massacre of Croake Park, again by this despot’s family.
I believe in forgiveness if the perpetrators are truly sorry for their actions but if anyone seriously thinks that these inbred tyrants are sorry for any of their past evils and those they are still perpetrating to this day, then get on your knees slaves and worship royalty whilst they rape you of everything you or your family has ever accumulated with their criminal banking cartels to assist.
(A: Ain’t that the truth though, eh?)
What is wrong with people when they actually believe that these parasitical murderers are better people than they are because they’ve pillaged ever nation on the planet?
And that’s true. When I was young, I used to go around all the castles, because I was really intrigued by them. It wasn’t just how huge they were. It was the dates they were actually built, and how thick they were, and the kind of money, from the peasantry, that must have been looted from them, and countries too, to build these incredible, massive castles, so as these regals could live inside them in safety. And they often built them on top of cliffs, etc. And today, it would run into the trillions to build some of them. And these were built early on when the Normans came in, basically. And again, inside too the palatial fireplaces they’d have for their get-togethers in the winter, fireplaces 12 to 15 feet wide, and 6 feet high. And they’d have the peasants throwing logs on for them of course, and stuff like that. But I mean, you couldn’t believe how they lived. And they were utterly ruthless.
And what I used to do too, was go around, you’d always find the torture chambers and the condemned cells and stuff, often buried into the mountain that the castles were built on. And these little dingy places, much like today, where they torture people. Nothing much changes. When it works, why change it. You could hardly lie down, never mind stand up. And you’d have no window, or maybe a little thing about four inches square, if you’re lucky, and just dirt floor and you lay on the floor. That’s how you slept. And they often rounded people up when they got any disturbances at all, just like Lenin did too. You just grab a bunch of peasants and hang them, and leave them to rot to scare the rest. That was part of his motto. And he, of course, learned this from Royal Families a long time ago, by reading their histories. And what they would do is just grab peasants, and make a big demonstration of them in public, and then lock them up for years. Make sure the public in the villages, etc, always knew these people were locked up. And then, once they were old and crippled, and they couldn’t even stand up straight, because of the height of the cells, and they looked like some walking corpse, they’d release them and let them go to further terrify the general public that if they said or did anything, they’d end up in the same boat, the same condition. And it’s so true. It’s so, so true.
You know, it was only recently, about a year or two ago, that the Great Lord Kitchener, Lord Kitchener was one of the big army generals that helped conquer parts of Africa and India and different places. And of course, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs had been writing their history books, since the early 1900s. Winston Churchill talked about that. He said, he didn’t know that the guys who were causing the wars and financially profiting off the wars, he meant the Royal Institute of International Affairs at that time, under the Milner Group and the Rhodes Society, are also the ones who are giving our school children, right up to university level their history books. They were writing their histories as well. Nothing has changed.
Anyway, Kitchener, under the Official Secrets Act, I think it was locked up for a hundred years or something with Kitchener, his great tactic was just to go into the towns that were causing him trouble, and take all the males out by the hundreds and have them all shot down. And that’s why it was put under the Official Secrets Act, but it’s okay to tell us today, not that anyone cares. People don’t care anymore, you see. And if you think anything has actually changed, than I really, really am scared of you. Scared of you, why? Because, you see, you’ll be the willing follower for Fascism or for Communism or any kind of Marxism, you will be a willing follower going through the same game and being used by the same kind of characters that have been used in the past. So you do scare me. Ignorance scares me. Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. I’ll also put two articles up on the protests in Ireland as well. And we’ll go to the callers now, and there’s Luke from Vermont there. Are you there Luke?
Luke: Yep. Hi. Thanks for taking my call. I just noticed a couple of things. First of all, we have to look at, we have to listen to people tell us that they want to reduce our numbers in their books, and on the Georgia Guide Stones, but if we ever open our mouths and say, hey, we want to reduce some of their numbers, we’re going away.
Alan: Yeah, of course, absolutely. And they’re ready for it too. They’re ready for the crash, the bigger crash to come yet. They’re ready for when they really, really force austerity upon the US citizenry, and you will have no extra spending cash at all. It will be essentials only, if you’re lucky to even get them. They’ve been preparing for that in the US for thirty years, by the way.
Luke: Yeah, it’s definitely true. I, well, I was about to dramatize there. I’m still in video game land. I went to a mental hospital for opening my mouth up to a doctor. And I went in for like three weeks and I had to take pills, and you know, the mapping, the whole layout of this building I was at, was the shape of a brain. You know, I don’t know if that’s apparent, but it certainly seemed like it to me. Drugs did play a part before I went in. I will, I will say that to be honest. But, anyway, while I was inside there, I noticed something in a magazine, and it was an ad for a Power Bar, and, because you’re always talking about Symbology, and I thought this might have had some. It said, “Power Bar.” There was a guy on top of a mountain, and there were three mountains, two others surrounding him, and then the one he was on. And the caption said, “Happy he ate Power Bar. Sad he forgot flag.” And I was like thinking to myself, “Wow that sounds incredibly similar.” And there was a little pentagon symbol.
Alan: You’ll see the same three mountains in one of the big movie companies as well, and then they surround it with 22 stars. There used to be 32 stars they used. I think it’s down to 22 stars now. It’s the same three mountains you’re seeing there. And you’re right enough, it’s a Masonic symbol.
Luke: Very interesting.
Alan: And a lot of people too, the Soviet Union were famous for locking people up, remember too, for their views. And just like they are in America now, they diagnosed everything as an illness, so they could always get you on one or another. Even poor mathematics in America now is diagnosed as an illness. You could be a genius in English literature, but if you’re bad at mathematics they’ll classify you as mentally ill. And I’m not kidding. That’s in their manual now. Even nervous leg syndrome, that children get when you’re sitting there for too long, and your leg starts fidgeting. That’s classified as an illness. And they’ve got pills for that. They’ve got pills for everything. And they’ve got pills for your points of view, as well. So, really, you see, all systems, as I say, eventually become the same. They’re really all the same systems, no matter what ideology they pretend they’re under, it’s run by a small clique that must stand around the tenets of their system and parrot everything, even though it’s completely, just like global warming, if all the facts don’t fit, it doesn’t matter, they’ve got to hang on to it, like a religion until the end. And they destroy everything in the process and all of you in the process to get their way too. And that’s a sad thing, again, which history does teach us. Thanks for calling. And Hitler said the same thing about Germany. At the end, the very end, he says, “If Germany can’t win then they should all die. They’re not fit.” He believed in the Darwinian principle, you see. So, that’s the way it is.
From Hamish and myself, from Ontario Canada, Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
Former Gravy Train Global Warming Scientist Recants
Key Canadian Intelligence Operative Denounced to US Authorities
Israel Lobby, US and Iran
Russia Warns West of New Cold War if New Missile Systems Cordon Russia
FBI and Sovereign Citizens Movement
No Irish Flags Allowed at Queen's Visit
Irish Flag Banned for Queen's Visit
Irish Pay for Queen's Visit during "Austere Times"
Menu for the Queen
Irish Greet Queen with Protests
British Media Versus Irish Opinion re. Queen's Visit