May 18, 2011 (#835)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:


Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 18, 2011:

Money -- Approval and Kickbacks
For the "I'm All Right" Jacks:

"Pimps and Prostitutes, The Modern Insanity
Of Those for Paychecks, Discarding Humanity,
Becoming Their Jobs, The Suppression of Others
Condoned by Uniforms, Slogans and "Brothers",
No Journalist Would Ever Pen a Spoof
If it Contained a Mere Modicum of Truth,
They Play the Game to Please the Masters
By Reinforcing Pabulum, Fear, Disasters,
The System's a Joke, Perpetual Darkness the Goal,
Of Those Who for Money Sell Out Their Soul"
© Alan Watt May 18, 2011


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - May 18, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the May the 18th 2011.  For newcomers, look into the web site and help yourself to the audios which are there for free download; there are lots to choose from.  Hopefully it will give you a head start on what runs the big system we live under, this big menagerie of stories and tiers of bureaucracies and government departments and supranational governments and so on, all these things, how they intertwine and how, really, you’re working towards and living towards an agenda that was worked out well over 100 years ago in its structural form and actually implemented then too, to bring about a global government with a new type of system, not democratic by any means, but a system where the fittest, the better suited as they say, the most intelligent will work on behalf of the big bankers, the international money lenders, those who are already stinking rich, and basically bring in a new ordered society with a kind of socialist streak on it, kind of communist you might say, to run the people at the bottom, but really a fascist system on top, because they don’t believe in democracy by any mark at all.  And we’re well under it actually.  Even the takedown of the US was predicted by them.  They work things out like long-term business plans, way in advance, and we’re simply going through the stages now of the crashing of what were called first world countries, well planned and thought out.  Your countries were given away a long time ago as far as your economies were concerned with big treaties they signed under the United Nations with the World Trade Organization and other UN affiliates.  So that’s what it’s really all about.  All of the stuff that you get in the papers today is just daily fluff – that’s all it is – as they never bring up the past, they never bring up how this all came to be. They try to keep you stuck in the moment thinking, it’s just happening in my lifetime and it’s just by happenstance and circumstance that things are happening today.  Nothing is further from the truth. 


Look into the web site.  Do that and remember, transcripts are available from all the sites as well for print up, of a lot of the talks I’ve given.  You can also purchase the books and disks I have for sale at  [Order and donation options listed above.] 


So that’s the key to all of this.  You’re living through a big business plan run by private organizations actually.  You’d be surprised to find that most the institutions that really work with government are private organizations, long before you heard the term public/private partnerships and so on.  It’s been like that for over 100 years, well over 100 years.   You’ll find that the biggest partner, really, is the private sector.   Not the public sector but the private sector because all these organizations that tell the governments what to do are privately owned; they’re private.  And they often call themselves non-political organizations, and they’re telling the truth, like the Council on Foreign Relations; they always preface their announcements by, this is not a political organization. They’re true, because you see, they don’t play politics; they simply write down agendas.  It’s a big, big difference from having to play the game of politics when you can simply write out where the world’s to go and here’s how we’re going to bring it there.  The chaos you see now with unemployment, which is going to get a lot worse, believe you me, is nothing to what’s to come, unfortunately.  I hate being the bearer of bad news but that’s just the way it is.  It’s all planned that way.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, we’re back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and we’ve all heard about the greening projects and the sustainable communities from the wonderful United Nations, another private organization, and how it’s going to affect all your lives, and already is in fact, a lot more to come yet with taxes for everything, even for breathing.  Lots more is to come down the pike on this one. Of course there are different projects being started up under, again, this umbrella of the United Nations through NGOs, big foundations and so on, to build sustainable communities.  And they’re all over the US too.  They don’t know that communitarianism is already here, in fact; the same in Canada.  It’s to get worse too. 


The idea of these sustainable communities is for, really, an upper middle class, although they don’t ever mention the classes much in their little PR outputs. One is to do with San Francisco and it’s called, part of the Greenbelt Alliance. They’re all over the US now and Canada.  The Greenbelt Alliance are, again, these non-governmental organizations that are helping design where humans will live.  I guess if you don’t live in them you’re subhuman or not human at all, as opposed to calling you the poor.  Anyway, they’re already building them.  I’ve mentioned the ones in Britain with Prince Charles spouting off how wonderful they are and so on for this new kind of peasant type village of middle class servants, because that’s what they’ll really be, you see.  I noticed even years ago in Canada, in Ontario, that most of the people buying houses in the country were buying farms that were put under by the governments and the ones who were buying them over were employees of the governments that helped put the farmers under.  They call them ‘hobby farms’ and they could afford to live in them and use them as houses and recreation and their walkabouts and stuff like that.  No one else could afford them, you see, plus they get tax breaks for working for government and so on.  They also get mortgage breaks as well, of course.  There’s an awful lot you get with working for government.  But it reminded me, too, of the old system of the Soviet Union where the higher you went up on the ladder in the governmental structure the more perks you got with having your own little dacha in the country and all your servants and everything else. 


This ad here is from San Francisco.  I’ll put a couple of these links up tonight on it.   This sounds wonderful, really... 


Sustainable Development


What is a livable community?  Imagine an attractive, pedestrian-oriented and easily accessible neighborhood, with houses close to shops, restaurants, workplaces, entertainment, and other activities. (Alan:  Now, you know it’s not going to be the working class because they won’t be able to afford houses, to go to shopping, eat out and stuff like that.)  There are parks and great public spaces. People have choices in the types of homes provided (A:  Meaning your price range.), and new housing meets a variety of income ranges. For many, it is possible to commute to work by train or bus.  (A:  And that’s true.  Some will have special permits to drive, because under Agenda 21 it’s to be essential vehicles only. That generally means police, fire, and ambulance, and bureaucrats.  So it gives you a list of...)


These are some of the essential elements of livable communities, towns and cities that are economically, environmentally and socially sustainable.   (A:  I won’t read all the garbage on it, but basically it’s the same stuff, as I say, worldwide, because in the US it’s called the greenbelt for human corridors and sustainable development and it’s called other names for other countries.  But it’s on the go, as we talk.)


Big grants are handed out by governments to these folk who could already afford these houses obviously, but you’ve got to be in-the-know to get them, the right sort of class you know.  What do you do?   I work for government, I’m a civil servant.  Oh, well, we can help you out there.  And that’s how it works out, you see.  So I’ll put those links in tonight on it. 


One Bay Area -


It’s amazing too how each culture is catered to according to the culture and how they’re trained.  And every culture is trained.  Folk don’t like to believe that they’re actually trained in a culture.  You see, for an awful long time we’ve never really had a real culture.  We’ve been trained to believe in flags and systems and parties and all of that.  In Britain it’s always been the-stiff-upper-lip and just-grin-and-bear-it kind of stuff.  You know, that sadomasochistic type of training they used to give the children.  This says...


'Over-50s suffer a lifestyle crash':

Millions less comfortable than a year ago

 (but stiff upper lip helps them keep positive)

(A:  What rubbish!  What rubbish!   That’s to stop their jaws from quivering and then they start crying, you know.  That’s the reality of it.) / By Daily Mail Reporter / 17th May 2011


61 per cent 'cut back on non-essential spending' 

(A:  Well you see, this is what I’ve been talking about for years, the coming austerity, because all your money will go on bare essentials.  That’s what that means.  There’s many ways to get it through without putting the word in for you, and this is how it’s done.)


More than 60 per cent of Britons over the age of 50 say the quality of their lifestyle has ‘crashed’ over the past year, an alarming report reveals today.


It warns that millions of older people are being crippled by the combination of high cost of living, record petrol prices, tax increases and poor pay rises.


The report, from old-age specialists Saga, paints a bleak picture of ever-increasing financial burdens forcing over-50s to make drastic cutbacks in their personal spending.  (A:  Then it goes on and on with a lot more palaver too, talking about how bad it is, etc, etc, etc.  Really it gets down to, again, the fact is they have less disposable income. They’ve got no non-essential spending left.  That’s what it means.)


That’s where the US is to go too.  That’s where they’re being trained to go very quickly in fact.  Believe you me, the economy and the cost of living in the US is being kept artificially low.  As long as they were fighting the wars and all the rest of it, they had to keep it artificially low, and they’ve got a lot of catching up to do.  They also complain in this article about the Value Added Tax, which is called the GST (General Sales Tax) in Canada, and how it’s spread and keeps rising on everything that you purchase now.  It’s just out of sight.  So I’ll put this article up as well for you to see how bad it is.  And a new article too...


The new era of green taxes:

 Climate change targets to cost every household (A: extra...) £500 a year (A:  I guess that’s on top of the £1600 a year for the pensions for the EU bureaucrats and stuff like that, and all the other things they have to pay for now, now that they belong to the wonderful sovietized EU.) / David Derbyshire / 18th May 2011


UK targets the toughest of any country in the world.


Tough new climate change targets will cost every household in Britain £500 a year.


The targets will usher in a new era of green taxes (A:  What do you mean ‘green’ taxes, eh?  What do they mean by ‘green’ taxes?  Really.  What is green?  Tax is tax!  Plunder is plunder, with all the guises they put it under.) and soaring fuel bills for millions of cash-strapped households.


Energy Secretary Chris Huhne yesterday committed the UK to a legally binding 50 per cent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 (A:  I guess they better hurry up and get into these sustainable communities where they can walk around and bicycle.)  in a move that will leave Britain £13.4billion-a-year worse off.  (A:  Why do people vote?  I honestly... I’m utterly at a loss to understand why people keep voting.  Really.  I really am at a loss.  You know, they keep waiting for a savior to come that they can vote into office, that’s just going to make...  Why would you vote for the same system that’s used and abused you and crippled you and left you in the state that you’re in? Why would you? because anybody who’s put in front of you, any face that they put in front of you, and vet before you see them or hear them, whether it’s US, Canada, Britain or elsewhere, have all been vetted.  They’re standing for the system as it is, with the same banking system running the show, and debt money and borrowing from private banks when there’s no need for any country to borrow at all.  Why would they keep on voting, eh?  Anyway it says...)


The targets are the toughest of any country in the world and will come at a huge price for Britain’s struggling economy.  (A:  What economy?  What’s the economy in Britain now?  They’re already dividing up the country into regions to be merged with other regions so that they can, in the future, have a generation growing up never taught there was an England, an Ireland, a Scotland, or a Wales.  Mind you, that City of London will still be running the whole show.)


In contrast, the U.S. has pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by only 3 per cent, while China – the world’s biggest polluter – expects its carbon dioxide emissions to rise.  (A:  Well you see, under the World Trade Organization, the GATT Treaty, all the emerging nations, and that includes India too and Brazil and elsewhere, don’t have to pay any, and they don’t have to comply.  They don’t have to pay any emissions taxes for up to 25 years or so and then they can get it postponed for another 25 years if they so wish.  These are the places to go, folks.  Remember Jacques Attali said that, Millennium: Winners and Losers in the Coming New World Order.  He said, the next boat people will be Americans leaving shores looking for work abroad.  That’s already happening by the way.  There’s lots of folk abroad from the US, Britain and elsewhere in other countries across the planet now, who managed to get out, and who have got a better standard of living where they are now.)


Critics say the plans could have only a minuscule impact on halting climate change (A:  Well there’s no evidence to say it will change anything at all, except make us more broke.  Which is actually the point of it all; they know it’s nothing to do with climate change.  It was an excuse to tax you out of your lifestyles and bring on austerity, and make you comply and move into cramped city areas for the majority of the public that can’t afford the little dachas in the country.)  but could stifle economic recovery and hamper business. They will also mean higher fuel bills, hitting poorest homes the hardest.


The announcement of the carbon budget – the limit on emissions – comes after a bitter rift in the Cabinet between Mr Huhne and Chancellor George Osborne and Business Secretary Vince Cable, who claimed the targets would make the UK uncompetitive.  (A:  No kidding.  And people are frozen in the winter and they expect thousands more this winter who can’t use any oil because they’re broke.  How can you make anybody competitive?  Hmm?)


Anyway, that’s austerity.  It’s all techniques laid down a long time ago, step by step, and now we’re going into the austerity phase now, under a lot of BS about carbon and greening and all that rubbish.  But any excuse will do.  It’s like the King, I think it was King James the 1st that brought in the light taxes, and he would tax you by the window, and people bricked up their windows.  I’m not kidding. That actually happened.  Now it’s the air, eh.  Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, we’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  Remember, Karl Marx talked about the trading blocs, how they’d amalgamate countries together and give them a superparliament under a world parliament eventually and that meant the United Nations at the top and basically an EU structure for the European communities with their parliament too.  And the American amalgamation, too, which by the way is still going on, it’s amazing how much they’ve already merged together and apparently the Prime Minister in Canada is still having negotiations, they’ve signed a lot of documents recently with the US for further integration with the US and Mexico and even other countries too.  But they keep it quiet from the papers here but there’s a lot of data that has snuck out about it. 


This article I’m going to read here is from Cease Fire and I guess it’s a leftist magazine, it says a leftist critique, and it starts off with Noam Chomsky who is a big enigma because I’ve heard Chomsky before say a lot of right stuff and points out the very obvious, but he also has often said there’s never been real socialism.  Well, what on earth is real socialism?  Hmm?  What is real socialism?  People should really put that across as to what they mean by real socialism, because personally I think Jacques Ellul was far more to the point and objective about all systems; they all become corrupt.  They all become corrupt and those psychopathic types always rise to the top of any system, and you cannot keep it legitimate for very, very long, no matter how you start it off.  And once you bring in central banking and borrowing and all the rest of it, they’re all going to be corrupt.  It’s just one big gangster system at the top.  So I’ll skip the part about Noam Chomsky and go on to what this author goes on to.  And he gives the old stories, of course, of how they had to merge Europe together because they had all these wars.  Well, they had all these wars since the Rothschild family took over about 5 countries and became the central bankers.  We’ve had perpetual war from then on actually.  This also misses out the fact too, that it was part of the deals done during World War II with FDR, and then the ones who came after him; that was one of the criteria for the Lend-Lease projects to bail out the countries involved in the war, was that they had to amalgamate Europe.  People don’t really realize that.  It was an old plan because it was dreamed up in World War I through the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  They wanted it then.  So anyway, he goes into integration and so on and what they really mean by integration.  It says...


Politics The problem with the EU: a Leftist critique / April 28, 2011 / Tom Kavanagh


By “integrating” further and further with the gargantuan European Union structure, the British government has lost far more of its independence than is generally accepted or actively mentioned by the broadsheet press. It is easy to see why many on the political “left” aren’t too concerned with this: after all, if the government, so utterly beholden to the interests of private corporations and capital as it is, doesn’t represent us anyway, why should we care if it has any power or not?


The answer, often overlooked, is that the alternative is even worse. The European Union is fundamentally and necessarily undemocratic.  (A:  I’ve been saying that since before they actually legitimized it.)   I am of the belief that much the same can be said of the British political system, however the idea that the answer to the problem of under-representation (at best) at national level is the imposition of a supranational structure that does not answer to the people in any of its constituent countries is an absurdity that has eased itself unchallenged into a position of respectability.  (A:  It’s completely non-democratic.)


The European Union is fundamentally undemocratic because, at its inception, the people in the countries whose governments opted in were not given a say in the matter. The same can be said of countries which have subsequently joined without first polling their citizens – the Union has been imposed from the top down.


Since most nations have joined, the powers wielded by the EU have also been drastically expanded, to such an extent that the comparatively benign, trade-facilitating economic union which existed when Britain joined has now been superseded by a virtual United States of Europe (A:  I’d call it the Soviet Union.), paying lip service to political representation whilst actively discouraging and blocking it.


That the institution is necessarily undemocratic is evidenced by the fact that, broadly speaking, whenever a European population has been able to vote for or against binding its own political institutions with those in Brussels, forced integration has been roundly rejected. As such, it is necessary for the people running the show to prevent people from voicing their opinions at the ballot box – if they were heeded, the outcome would be the dissolution of the edifice as it currently exists.


The British people were promised a referendum on the EU constitution by the previous Labour government, however as it became obvious that the chances of that being approved were minute following crushing defeats in France and Holland, the ruling classes put their heads together, changed the name, moved a few words around, and rebranded it as the Lisbon Treaty. That’s all right then, no point in wasting people’s time by letting them vote on something that isn’t even a constitution.


Former French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing confirmed what many opponents of the constitution and treaty had long attempted to point out. He told an audience at the London School of Economics that the French electorate’s rejection of the EU Constitution in the summer of 2005 had been a “mistake” which “should be corrected”.


Commenting on how he and his kin planned to attain this correction, Giscard d’Estaing affirmed, “Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals we dare not present to them directly… This approach of ‘divide and ratify’ is clearly unacceptable. Perhaps it is a good exercise in presentation. But it would confirm to European citizens the notion that European construction is a procedure organised behind their backs by lawyers and diplomats.” That is precisely what transpired.  (A:  So he goes into that and how, really, through various back doors they got the whole thing ratified.  Lots of payoffs at the top too, mind you.  That’s something they understand at the top, all those lovely psychopaths, as they tell us all we must live together quite happily, and they sit on their big fat paychecks.  Back with more after this.)


Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix.  Every law that’s ever been put on the books generally – we live in such an Orwellian world, you see – every law generally has a different intention than the sounding name that they give to it and the title that they give to it.  And once a law is on the books it generally is put on the books again; it’s almost like a stealth law, and we all sit back and yawn thinking, well what’s the problem with that, you know.  Really, it’s got another intention and it spreads.  They spread like cancer once they have them on the books.  That’s always the intention.  And they go in a whole bunch of different areas, you see.  And here is one too.  We know that the internet’s going down and its life is going to be very short now.  And people will still stay on it.  This is what they knew.  They keep lots of porn and that stuff and entertainment on it for people to keep watching it. So they know how the people work through psychology.  It says...


Senate bill makes illegal Internet streaming a felony / Eric W. Dolan / May 17th, 2011


Those who illegally stream live video or audio over the Internet could face up to five years in prison under legislation recently introduced to the U.S. Senate.


Ars Technica reported that Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), John Cornyn (R-TX) and Christopher Coons (D-DE) proposed a bill last week that would make "illegal streaming" of copyrighted content a felony.


Under current law, copyright infringement already carries felony penalties, but questions have been raised about whether broadcasting audio or video live over the Internet could be considered the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted works.


Streaming content has been considered a "public performance" rather than "distribution."


Two months ago, a report published by the White House's Office of the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator urged Congress to make illegal streaming of content a felony and allow law enforcement to wiretap those suspected of being involved in copyright infringement.


The report called on Congress "to ensure that [the Department of Justice] and U.S. law enforcement agencies are able to effectively combat infringement involving new technology" by clarifying that streaming unauthorized audio or video is a felony.


It appears Klobuchar, Cornyn and Coons followed the White House's legislative recommendations. Their bill would make showing 10 or more "public performances" by electronic means in any 180-day period a felony if the total retail value of those performances tops $2,500 or the cost of licensing such performances is greater than $5,000.


"It is high time that the punishment fit the crime. Illegal streaming of stolen content is growing and poses a threat to the profitability of movie theaters and to the jobs of our 160,000 employees in the U.S." said John Fithian, president and CEO of the National Association of Theatre Owners, in a statement. "We thank Senators Klobuchar and Cornyn and recommend bipartisan support for the passage of this important legislation."  (A:  So piece by piece this great wonderful tool is being chopped away as you use them.)


I’ve mentioned before about John Anthony Hill who was locked up by the British because he basically did an excellent video on 7/7 and pointed out all the incredible things that didn’t mesh up with the official report.  He said that the guys they eventually killed, that they claimed were the terrorists, were actually part of, which was an advertised practice for bombs going off in those exact areas, that day.  That’s a fact. They were advertising in the newspapers and over 1,000 people volunteered to take part in it.  And bingo!   On that very day in those exact places the bombs go off.  He pointed out all the inconsistencies in the official report.  Britain had to get something happening, just like that something was needed for 9/11, a Pearl Harbor event in order to go into full black-clad clothing, machine-gun type scenarios and get you all under a wartime type scenario.  That’s the whole thing, you see, war type scenario. We heard all that stuff being mentioned before it all happened.  Even the Green Party is saying it was far better under a warfare scenario, like World War II, because people became more austere and they obeyed government better, etc, etc, etc, and they ate less and they got along, and, you know, obedience.   So...


Suppressed News: “False Flag” Whistleblower Acquitted in Britain

(A:  I’ve mentioned this before but this is another article on him.)

Britain’s Largest Terror Attack Likely “Mossad/MI-5″ Operation

Anthony John Hill, “Maud dib” Found Not Guilty for Exposing 7/7 “Inside Job” / By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


The story has been censored from the American media.  Few Americans know of or remember the “British 9/11.” (A:  This is from Veterans Today, by the way.)  Fewer still are aware that a powerful legal case has been made showing full government complicity in the planning and execution of the attack and the extent the British government has gone to in order to suppress information about one of the worst kept secrets in history.  The film “Ripple Effect,” considered a threat to British “security” (A:  No kidding.  A film.  You make a film and it’s a threat to British Security.) led to one of the most incomprehensible criminal cases in recent years.


Anthony John Hill "NOT GUILTY"

On July 7, 2005, Britain suffered its largest terror attack, what they call “7/7,” their “9/11.”  However, a wealth of evidence, much incontrovertible, has shown these terror attacks to have been something else, “false flag” terror meant to support the Blair government’s policy of continuing and even expand its participation in the “Global War on Terror.”


The 4 Muslim “suicide bombers” once believed responsible for the incident are now believed to have been recruited as part of a well documented (A:  And it IS well documented.) mock terror drill scheduled for that day that included 1000 participants, some of them paid actors hired to carry dummy explosives.


It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files’ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot (A:  In other words, they were not just patsies, they were really fall guys, you see; they thought they were volunteering, I’m sure.) – as the best account yet.


The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view.


As part of what has been called “the continuing coverup of 7/7,” Britain reached across international borders and extradited a journalist (A:  The guy who made this movie.), attempting to impose a 20 year sentence for an alleged infraction of British law that happened in another country.


In doing so, Britain has claimed the right to censor any and all communication, print, video and internet in any country around the world that agrees support extradition under these circumstances.


One nation complied, Ireland.  (A:  Where they arrested him.)


After 151 days in dismal Wandsworth Prison, much of it in solitary confinement, John Anthony Hill is finally free. The crime he was accused of was the mailing of a “7/7 truther” DVD from Ireland to the United Kingdom.  Yes, you are hearing me right, he was extradited from Ireland for sending a copy of the film, “Ripple Effect,” which outlines complicity by the Blair government in terror attacks that killed 56 (A:  ...people...) back in 2005, including 4 “suicide bombers” now believed by many to have been murdered in a bizarre plot.


More frightening still is the idea that mailing a DVD, available worldwide on Youtube to anyone, could be considered “perverting the course of justice.” 


Kollerstrom’s  website, Terror on the Tube, describes the trial and acquittal:


(A:  He calls himself...) Muad’Dib’s (A:  ...I don’t know why.   I’ll just say, John Hill...) trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.


On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court.


Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.


This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.


It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.


Hill was found not guilty, not because his actions were considered legal but rather because his testimony made a powerful case against the British government.  The jury was pressed to convict Hill (A: the judge of course.) but refused.  The 10 members who sided with Hill and refused the instructions of the Crown did so, out of utter shock at the powerful case Hill made demonstrating that, not only 7/7 was an “inside job” but 9/11 as well.  Hill took on both attacks and 10 of 12 jury members sided with what has been often called “conspiracy theory.” 


It’s got a whole bunch of videos on this site, so I’ll give you the links and I’ll put them up at at the end of the broadcast.  It’s well worth going through because he really did an excellent job on showing the trains that weren’t running that day even, and regardless of the fact they weren’t even running the terrorists were supposedly on board them, stuff like that.  It’s just astonishing.  But that’s what they can do to you now when you go against, you know, Her Majesty’s government.  And it still IS Her Majesty’s government, believe you me.  They all swear allegiance to it and not the people. 


Now, in the States too, you can see as the panic drives up, as they try to keep hold of a country going way down the hill, plummeting, through massive debt and being deindustrialized through the World Trade Organization signed into by their own presidents, by the way, who sold them down the river.  They’re really lashing out at anyone criticizing the government at all.   It’s an amazing thing the Americans have got because it was discussed by the fathers of the Federation in the US if they should have a king or should they have a different kind of government.  And part of the reason they discussed the king was that the people were so used to it, and they also knew that people love to worship a human being.  People don’t know it in the States, too, they even sent an envoy over to France then Italy looking for Prince Charles who had been the survivor of the last big battle in Scotland against London’s guys, and they approached him to become king.  And he didn’t want it.  So they went ahead with this form of government.  But it doesn’t matter because throughout the whole 20th century into this century the US, through its massive propaganda machine too mind you, paints the president and the first lady up to be a king and a queen.  It’s the same kind of stuff.  They walk on water. They’re holier than thou.  They don’t go to bathrooms or go do any nasty stuff like that.  And that’s what people love to worship.  Anyway, when he’s under attack, the guy at the top, just like the Queen for instance, they do come down on you. 


White House Threatens Boston Herald's Press Access for Not Being Favorable Enough to Obama / Lachlan Markay | May 18, 2011


The Barack Obama White House rewards its friends and punishes its enemies. News outlets would be wise to ensure that they don't fall into the latter category.


That is the message the Obama Campaign tried to send in 2008 when it sicced campaign activists on talk radio shows that dared to give voice to Obama's critics. It was the message the White House sent with its assault of the Fox News Channel. And now it's the message the administration is sending by reportedly threatening to bar Boston Herald reporters from full access to presidential events simply because the White House does not approve of the paper's editorial judgment.


The Herald gave former Massachusetts governor and GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney front-page op-ed space in March, bumping off a story about a presidential visit to Boston. That, the White House claimed, signaled that the paper is not "fair" or "objective" in its coverage. Hence, the Herald will be barred from pool duty on presidential visits, a White House spokesman implied.


The White House Press Office has refused to give the Boston Herald full access to President Obama’s Boston fund-raiser today (A: well...) , in e-mails objecting to the newspaper’s front page placement of a Mitt Romney op-ed, saying pool reporters are chosen based on whether they cover the news “fairly.” 


So unless you give glowing reports on Obama you’re just not going to get in on the little circus, not that I would care personally because it’s all PR shots and they read scripts and stuff.  It’s all done by script writers.  Personally I’d just like to do away with Presidents and Prime Ministers and we can have the script writers on.  They do all the work.  They are the guys that are really in-the-know of what’s to be said to the public.  These are the guys that are trained in mass psychology and marketing and how the masses work and how our minds work.  And we could give a form of Oscars every year for the best ones, that write the best scripts, and it would save you the cost of Presidents and Prime Ministers.  That’s what we should really do.  Because we’re living in a complete joke, I hope you understand.  It’s a joke.  It’s a sick joke but it’s still a joke.  That’s what democracy is.  So I’ll put that link up as well. 


Also, this article here is from Market Watch.  It says...


Strauss-Kahn? Here’s the real IMF scandal - By Brett Arends / / May 18, 2011


And it’s nothing to do with him.  Forget him, they’ll just find another monkey on steroids, you know, and that’s psychopathic to replace him with.  Anyway it doesn’t matter.  It gives you basically what the IMF’s involvement in the world crash was.  The same organization that wants to get in to every country’s books and start doing, be the official bookkeepers for every nation, by the way, under this world system they’ve helped to manage and bring in, and how they helped actually bring on the big financial crash that we’re all suffering though right now.  I’ll put this article up, and also on it, there’s a PDF where their own organization, under the IMF, going over its own stuff, lambasts the organization for doing all the stuff I’m just talking about, bringing on the financial crisis.  So it’s got the links to it, to what happened, who did what, and what they should have done and what they didn’t do, and what they actually did do.  That’s all on that as well. 


Pdf:  IMF Performance in the Run-Up to the Financial and Economic Crisis -


It’s just disgusting!  The system we live in, as I say, it’s a joke.  To be honest with you, I couldn’t be a reporter in major mainstream because I couldn’t go along with it.  I couldn’t.  I don’t care about the paycheck; I couldn’t go along with it.  The problem in this system, you see, we’re trained, very, very cleverly trained, again, through psychology, and you’ve got to go through Gatto’s books and all the other books put out there on what education is meant to bring in to society, a wonderful obedient brainless class of citizenry that serve the system – that’s what it’s for – making sure they get all the right politically correct values brainwashed into them.  But not to think for themselves.  It’s taboo going through college and university to think for yourself.  You play a game; everyone knows you’re playing a game when you have to parrot what the professor says.  Everyone, everyone prostitutes themselves going through this system.  And then when it gets into the wider world in professionalism of journalism and all the rest, they’re all prostitutes too.  They know damn well, every single one of them, they’re a prostitute for a paycheck.  And people become their jobs.  They become their jobs, literally.  From the executioner or the guy that’s sent across the world to slaughter people, I’m just doing by job, this is what I do, I’m a soldier.  Really?  Really?  You were born saying, I am a soldier?  I don’t think so.  And no journalist could possibly keep their job if they were ever, ever to write the darn truth.  And they all know it.  Utter prostitutes!  I’ll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks, we’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about the pimps and prostitutes that people become when they get a paycheck.  They’ll do anything for a paycheck.  And it’s true what they said during the Civil War in New York where the mayor said at Tammany Hall.  He said, you can always hire half the poor to kill the other half.  It’s unfortunately darn, darn true.  Everyone that puts a uniform on, too, will do the same thing.  He doesn’t care who he’s killing, he just does what he’s... well, that’s my job you know.  And everyone says the same thing, all the bureaucrats say the same thing too, with that, you know, neutral face that they learned to put on.  Everyone’s a pimp and a prostitute in a corrupt system.  And they darn well know it.  Darn well...  And really, the people who go along with it, and get caught up in it, with the media, just astound me too.  They can’t even be real to themselves.  If you can’t be real to yourself you can’t be real to the public, on anything.  Just pimps and prostitutes. 


As I mentioned before too, you cannot create any governmental agency, any type at all, even local government agency, that eventually doesn’t expand like a cancer because once you get a few together, you see, they say, well we better start justifying our job here and find new reasons for us to exist, and then make them understand above us that we’re vitally important.  So they just hire cops like cancers, who are all over the streets, they’re all over the roads, are collecting tickets or whatever they’re doing, because they got to make new kinds of crime all the time to justify their job.  And then once countries get scared, you see, when they know it’s kind of going down, they become more severe.  That’s when they really start bashing their own people... for all kinds of things.  This article here too, I’m sure you’ve all heard about the...


Secret Service interrogates Tacoma 7th grader

The young boy was questioned by Secret Service for his Facebook posting. / Dana Rebik / May 16, 2011


A Tacoma seventh grader faced federal interrogation at school for what he posted on his Facebook page.  His mom said it all happened (A:  Because she was standing nearby eventually when she came in and saw him getting interrogated.) without her knowledge or permission.


Timi Robertson said she had just finished lunch with a friend Friday when she got a phone call from her son's school.


"I answered it, and it's the school security guard who's giving me a heads up that the Secret Service is here with the Tacoma Police Department and they have Vito and they're talking to him," Robertson said.


After Osama bin Laden was killed, 13-year-old Vito LaPinta posted an update to his Facebook status that got the Feds attention.  (A:  The Feds are so worried about children and what they’re saying.  They’re like a cancer that’s spread... and they’ve got to show how vital they are for security so they can hire more guys and stuff. The bigger the numbers... each department feels safer the bigger the numbers they’ve got, the more staff they have.)


"I was saying how Osama was dead and for Obama to be careful because there could be suicide bombers," says LaPinta.  (A:  Now, all he’s doing is parroting the mainstream news because that’s what was all over the mainstream.  Red alert, red alert, red alert, everybody be terrified, terrified.  You know.  He was parroting mainstream news, right.)


A week later, while Vito was in his fourth period class, he was called in to the principal's office.


"A man walked in with a suit and glasses and he said he was part of the Secret Service," LaPinta said. "He told me it was because of a post I made that indicated I was a threat toward the President."  (A:  They can’t even read right, these guys, these morons.)


The Tacoma school district acknowledged a Secret Service agent questioned Vito and that it was a security guard who called Vito's mom because the principal was on another call. The school district said they didn’t wait for Vito’s mother to get there because they thought she didn't take the phone call seriously.  (A:  Well, who would, eh?)


"That's a blatant lie," Robertson said.


The teen’s mom says she rushed to Truman Middle School immediately and arrived to discover her son had already been questioned for half an hour.


"I just about lost it," she said. "My 13 year-old son is supposed to be safe and secure in his classroom and he's being interrogated without my knowledge or consent privately."  (A:  You’re lucky they didn’t waterboard him as well, because that is what you all, everybody in the US, are allowing the US to become.  And they’ll work around to YOU one day... every single one of ya.)


From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 



Topics of show covered in following links:


Sustainable Development---Greenbelt Alliance

--More on Above

Over 50s Suffer Austerity Measures

Green Taxes

Undemocratic EU and its Tactics

Unauthorized Video Streaming--a Felony

John Hill of 7/7 Ripple Effect Freed by Jury Against Judge's Wishes---Videos

White House Threatens Boston Herald

The Real IMF Scandal

How the IMF Helped Bring On the World Financial Crisis--Report by its Independent Evaluation Office

7th Grader Interrogated for Parroting Mainstream News


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"