May 12th, 2011 (#831)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 12th, 2011:
A Riches to Rags Story:
Try the Lottery,
'cause UN Creates Poverty:
"Dear United Nations, Help Us No More,
We're All in Straitjackets, Poorer and Sore,
Since You Were Formed We've Given Trillions in Aid,
Even Now When We're Broke You Still Get Paid,
You Push Sexist Policies Under Thin Veil,
Saying Third World Want Abortions, Blame the Male,
A Marxist Regime, Run by Big Bankers
Who Run CFR and All Media Gangsters,
Your Routine of Pity, Consternation,
To Help Masters Own All by "Conservation"
And Foisting Carbon Taxes, A Con of a Vision,
Turning the World into Servile Poor Prison,
Liars, Bombing Nations to Force Democracy,
Scheming Eugenicists, With Utter Hypocrisy"
© Alan Watt May 12th, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt Ė May 12th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 12th of May, 2011. Newcomers should look into the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and help yourself to the audios which are there for free download. I try, hopefully to give you the shortcuts to understanding this system youíre born into, and everyone else is born into before you, in fact, your parents, grandparents, and so on, and how really itís an artificial structure, a superstructure, going over above governments, and inside governments too, they place their own boys inside, with a very long-term goal. Itís been on the go for an awful long time, centuries actually, and they wrote about it in their own books, especially in memoirs of retirees, from the big associations, which help rule the world. And you can piece it all together. Thereís plenty of proof out there. They give you your culture, your thoughts, your talks for the day, the things youíll bicker about. And they give you your presidents and prime ministers, pretty well across the world now. They set up the United Nations, and they go under the guise often of charity, with their big massive foundations, which really are tax-free exemptions for their big banks and their big businesses, like the Rockefeller foundation. So, through many, many different avenues, they manage to shape the world according to what they want it to be, including updating your culture to suit the times and getting you ready for the next move as well of integration globally. Weíve been going through that for years now.
And remember too that on this particular broadcast, I donít bring on guests to sell stuff or to bamboozle you. And therefore, I hope that you will help me out to stay on the air by buying the books and discs I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Remember, all the sites listed have transcripts too of a lot of the talks for print up, as well as the audios, and if you want transcripts in other languages, go to alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and help yourself from the variety offered there. So, if you buy the books and discs I have for sale, you can certainly keep me ticking on for a little while longer. From the US to Canada, remember, you can use a personal check. You can also use an international postal money order, from the post office. And you can send cash. And you can also use PayPal to order. Just use the donation button, thatís supplied there. Youíll see how to order on the site, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and then follow it with an email with name, address, and order. Iíll get it out to you. Across the rest of the world, same idea. Youíve got Western Union, Money Gram, youíve got PayPal to order with the donation button.
And remember, straight donations are certainly, certainly appreciated, because as I say, it costs quite a bit of cash to keep even this, what Iím doing here, on the go. And Iím not out to make a profit, believe you me. And if I did, Iíd go the way that most do go. Most hosts make their money from bringing guests on, who either pay them, or theyíre paid by advertising. And thatís okay. Theyíve got families and all the rest of it, or they want a career, but personally, Iím only on the air, because I thought years ago it was time to come out with this information, before it was too late, before it was even banned to speak about it, and that will happen fairly shortly. Actually, theyíre cutting in already with so many international laws to do with free speech, which isnít free anymore. Itís limited speech, and selected speech or selective speech. Thatís what weíll have in the future, in the near future. And youíll notice already, most of the interesting topics that weíre given are spun and given to us by the mainstream media, which is all across the internet now. And thatís what everyone is going by. Three levels of news or reality. One is the bottom level media, itís all spun by the Council on Foreign Relations, the guys who help run America, on behalf of their brother in Britain, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Theyíve been running the world for an awful long time. Every president and prime minister has been a member since the late 1800s, when it was called a different name. And Carroll Quigley who was the historian for them, and looked over their records, and wrote a book about it, actually said the same thing too. So, your media is spun by them, because every owner is a member of the CFR as well. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, weíre back, and weíre Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about this massive institution across the World, that has many other organizations, specialized, working in specialized areas with different names, but really itís all one big private organization. And we donít vote these guys in, and yet they put the guys forward for you to vote for at the top levels in every country pretty well. They have for a hundred years. And the public have no clue about it. They get lost up in the hype, as the same CFR media goes into action, to tell you who to pick. So, itís an interesting system we do live under. And part of their system too was to create the United Nations. First they created the League of Nations, they called it, and then the United Nations at the end of World War II. And the idea was to bring in a system of blocs, different blocs, regions, they call them, or blocs, training blocs, and merge countries together. And they said in the early days that theyíd have to create wars for this to make the people give up sovereignty.
And so, they helped plan World War I, in effect, because Professor Carroll Quigley who, as I said, was a historian, he was introduced to the group through Zimmern, his name was. Zimmern was an advisor to Winston Churchill and also a Communist. He ran the Communist paper for Britain. And it just shows you that theyíre all pals together, of course, but they were all for setting up the Soviet Bloc, and they were also involved in setting up Germany for World War II. And if you want to hear Quigley talking about this himself, Iíll put a link up tonight, on one of the very few interviews that he ever gave to his students. And youíll hear him talk about this, if you get past the first half where he talks about his books and how he had a hard time getting them published, because he was blowing the whistle on the Council on Foreign Relations. And he was all for what they were doing, by the way, but of course they didnít want the public to know. And they actually, eventually pulled his book, and didnít allow another printing, etc. So, youíll hear him, with his own mouth, talking about what happened to him, and how these guys literally have been running the world for up to the 1960s, already since the late 1800s. And the public knew nothing about it.
And one of the great guises is, again, through charity, and helping people. Itís always through the fronts of helping people. Who can deny them? Getting laws passed to help people, but in reality theyíre shaping the world and the cultures, and they do believe in using a form of Marxism. Quigley talked about that himself in his own book, Tragedy and Hope, he mentioned that theyíre often mistaken for the left wing. Itís because they use these tactics through charities and their foundations to get laws passed, which, of course, gives them the right to put their own boys into the new bureaucracies that are built up to take care of things. And they always go in the opposite direction of what you think. So, itís very deceptive.
Even George Orwell gave them the term, this big system, and he called it Big Brother, as well, because they donít believe in freedoms at all. They believe in a planned society for a planned world. And they had to use the Marxist system to destroy the family unit. That was the one thing that all down through time had stood up against these people, was the family unit, and if they could destroy the family unit, they could have every individual separated from every other individual, and then the government could literally talk down to you, just like Orwell showed you in Nineteen Eighty-Four, when the screen addressed him with a number, Smith and a number. So, thatís the system youíre going into.
And one of the biggest tricks, of course, was a United Nations that tries to use this kind of white and blue flag, very familiar those colors, arenít they. And theyíre so much for peace and equality across the world. Nothing is further from the truth, because theyíre set up, literally, to take over all forms of your own government, in every area. And they have actually been doing that through the United Nations for years. They pass laws there through treaties, and then your own government enacts them into law, right down to your building codes and everything else. And all your Greening agendas come through the United Nations, because, again the big banking boys who really are at the top, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. This is the kind of system they want, where they own all the land, and the food supplies and everything. Itís all the natural resources. Everything you need to live and survive, they want to own. And youíll have to come to them, as Rockefeller said, eventually for your food and everything else, and on your bended knee, by the way.
One of the tricks too, was to form UNESCO, at the United Nations, and that was to really start to get a common culture built across the world through the indoctrination through school systems across the world, and raise a new generation that were internationally minded, and Marxist in their perspective. They would be very easily managed then by the big boys at the top. And they used all the teachers unions to get it through. And Julian Huxley, of course, was the first CEO of that. And Iíve mentioned and read from his own books before on the air here. Theyíll be in the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, where you can hear him talk about the strategies he was going to use. How theyíd blur sexuality and all the rest of it, and really make promiscuity the normal thing, until people wouldnít want to get married anymore. Then, of course, theyíve literally split up all bonding. They would separate the bonding process from the sexual act, and theyíve done it all. Everything that they wanted theyíve pretty well accomplished. And you think youíre just evolving and doing your own thing.
Well, hereís an article here, and Iíll put it up tonight too, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of this broadcast. Iíll put the link up. And itís from Chatham House, the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is the Big Brother system for the CFR and all the rest of them. And itís about UNESCO. It says:
Global Governance for the 21st Century: A UNESCO Perspective by Irina Bokova
Whoís the director general now of UNESCO. Theyíre all in for family planning now and all that stuff, and lowering and reducing populations, etc. And she goes through some of the history of it, and so on and so on, and so on. She goes into economics, of course, and how theyíre going to manage the economies of the planet, and then she goes into what the UNESCO part of the United Nations is all about, which is to indoctrinate children into the proper way of thinking for their masters, in other words. So, Iíll put this whole article here. And thereís a PDF on the article too. You can download it for yourself. And she talks about global governance, and how itís not quite settled yet. Thereís still some challenges across the world as they bomb people out of existence and into the same system. The ones who are objecting to it, that is. And then they use the poverty stuff too, how they want to eradicate poverty. These guys literally want to bring you down to a few million people across the whole globe. And whatís interesting too is all the organizations as well, which they help, they actually are the boss over, all the Greening stuff, all of that kind of stuff. Itís very, very interesting. And Iíll put that up, as I say at the end of this broadcast tonight.
So, global governance for the 21st Century. Did you vote for these guys? Do you vote for the United Nations? Well, nobody votes for the United Nations. Theyíre an independent, private organization, run by bankers, the international boys. And whatís interesting too, is they put out these articles, the same group, of course, put out these articles about other countries that they want to target or are targeting. And you might remember, a few months back there before they started bombing Libya, that Gaddafi had asked for money to help contain all the refugees, which Europe asked him to contain. Because they didnít want Europe flooded with refugees passing through Libya. They wanted them to stay there. Well, he was going to pay for it all, all these people, was going to pay for it all through their oil money and so on. And he did the natural thing: Well, if you want us to do that, pay for it. And it was a big hullabaloo in the newspapers at the time. Well, hereís the latest spin from the same guys who run the world.
Libyan government is forcibly expelling migrants in a bid to flood Europe with refugees, UN claims
(Alan: Now that heís getting bombed, of course, thatís the last thing on his mind, is containing them. And whoís complaining about it? The United Nations. Oh, this wonderful private organization, you know, that wants to rule the world. Pretty well does. So, theyíre blaming him for all this flood of immigrants into Europe.)
Colonel Gaddafi has previously warned European leaders backing the revolt against his 41-year rule that he would 'unleash a wave of migrants against Europe' in retaliation for military strikes.
The arrival of large numbers of migrants fleeing Libya has already caused strains among EU nations.
(A: Well, whenever they go in and bomb any country, if youíve noticed, thereís always a flood of refugees out of them, Somalia and so on, all across the world. Itís been happening forever, wherever they go in and bomb. Would you stay there? Do you want to stay and get bombed by the biggest armies and the most advanced militaries, and targeting systems in the world? I wouldnít stay there. Would you? So, theyíre blaming him for all these guys flooding out of it. Here they go in and bomb the country, and the people flood out and they blame Gaddafi.)
Antonio Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, told a conference in Paris today: 'There are elements to make us think that at least some of the actors involved in what's happening today in western parts of Libya may be attempting to use this weapon of forcing people to move into Europe.'
What a hypocrite, eh? Weíre bombing them. They flood out. And letís blame Gaddafi for it. Itís amazing, as I say, the abuser always blames the victims, eh. They always do. What a great tactic it is. Thatís the tactic of the wild mind that they talk about, the ones that would survive, the ones that are not domesticated. Weíre domesticated and you think in a linear fashion. These guys donít think linear, but they know how you think. Theyíve trained you to think in a linear fashion, so that youíll believe them.
And then, weíre so sick of bailing out the big banks themselves, who never, ever really failed. Theyíre too big to fail, as they say. And weíll never change the laws to stop them from doing it again. Thatís why they keep the same laws on the books, so that they can do it again. They like to bankrupt countries, and often the world, twice a century. Thatís their standard technique. Anyway:
$5 Fees May Be Coming to an ATM Near You
(A: Why? Well, it says, J.P. Morgan Chase and others are trying to recoup approximately $30 Billion a year lost in overdraft fees. So they want to put a $5.00 ATM charge on every transaction. Thatís their excuse, anyway, to just rob you all the more. So:)
Nessa Feddis, spokeswoman with the American College of Consumer Financial Services, agreed there are "enormous pressures on banks because of lost revenue."
These are the guys who lost all the cash in the world and said it went to money heaven, remember? Well, how come they knew where it went to, eh? Ha, ha, ha. It didnít disappear. But thatís the rubbish we get at the bottom level. Weíre the mushrooms, and this is the stuff you feed mushrooms with. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, weíre back, Cutting Through the Matrix, and talking about the big system thatís interlaced with other systems, all belonging to the one group, basically, but specialized systems which all work towards the capstone, the big head of the pyramid, and how they run every aspect of our lives, and I mean every aspect of our lives, including the culture creation. The culture destruction, when itís done its job. And then the creation of the next part of the culture and so on. Weíre led by the generation, and actually, they can actually do it much, much faster now. And theyíve been doing that for a long, long time, so much so that Beria, who was the head of the NKVD, during the early part of the Soviet Union in the 30s talked about the ability to literally, rather than take seventy years to alter a culture, one whole generation, they could actually alter it within a space of three to five years by scientific indoctrination through schools and media and so on. So, itís much faster today, of course. Itís done like a seamless flow of culture changes all the time, as weíre taught to accept new and newer and newer things, things that we would turn our back on long ago, youíll accept without a thought tomorrow, because everyone else is going to accept it, and thatís how you think. Well, everybody else is accepting this, it must be alright. And then weíre told to feel bad about not thinking about or accepting things. So youíre a bad person if you donít go along with the rest of them, you see. Thatís very simple Pavlovian training.
Hereís an article tying in, of course, with the United Nations, and UNESCO and all the other characters too. Itís very interesting and I meant to read it a while back. Itís from the Guardian. Now, the Guardian again is one that plays the left wing in Britain. Itís all for all the eco stuff thatís coming down the pike, and the high taxations, and getting folk off their land and into the overcrowded cities, on behalf of their own masters, who are the same bunch I was talking about earlier. This is about the next Earth Summit at Rio. The Rio í92 Earth Summit was the one that brought you a whole bunch of organizations which are now common knowledge. Youíve heard them so many times, but you didnít know where it all came from. And it shows you photographs at the top of the first í92 meeting, and the closing speech at the Rio í92 Earth Summit. By the way, it was all drafted up by Rockefeller himself, and given to Maurice Strong to chair basically. And Boutros Boutros-Ghali was there too, so great they named him twice. You know, all that kind of stuff. Anyway, it says here:
I've got good news
(A: This is the lefty Greenies speaking of course. They want us all to stop breathing and save CO2 and pay high taxes for breathing at all, anyway:)
Öabout the future of the planet.
Good news first. Next year, a honking big global Earth Summit is coming our way -- one with a proud heritage. Formally titled the U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development, (A: These are the guys who brought it to you, the United Nations.) the meeting is known as RIO+20 because it will come 20 years after the first Earth Summit in Rio in 1992. That original Earth Summit (itself 20 years after the equally important Stockholm Convention on the Environment and Human Development)
(A: This is all from the Royal Institute of International Affairs by the way. As I say, they run the United Nations. They created it.)
gave us an embarrassment of policy riches: the Climate Convention,
(A: This is what they gave us from this one.)
the Convention on Biological Diversity,
(A: Where they gave the plants and insects all the rights and humans none.)
Sustainable Development Commission,
(A: About Population reduction and so on.)
the Precautionary Principle, a long and ambitious list of promises called Agenda 21,
(A: Thatís where that came from.)
The Forest Principles, and much more. Over a hundred heads of state turned up to Rio Di Janeiro last time amidst intense global attention. This time, the reunion party is going back to Rio again on 4-6 June 2012. Chances are it will all be a big deal again.
(A: Now, a couple of days is nothing, right. So, itís just like these big G20 Meetings, where they meet and they all shake hands. They get about five minutes to speak, each person, and then they just eat for a couple of days and drink till theyíre drunk and their servants take them back to their big chauffer-driven limousines and stuff. Itís much the same as that; in other words, all the plans, all the papers are drawn up in advance by the Sherpas, they call them. Thatís what they call these guys who are sent across the world, these bureaucrats over the years, doing all the work necessary for these heads all to come together for two days, get drunk and all that, and sign. They call them Sherpas. So, anyway, here they are at it again.)
At a recent preparatory meeting in New York, the agenda for this next Earth Summit became clear. The leaders will issue a "focused political document" tackling the transition to a global "green economy"
(A: See, they turned you into a service economy when they took your factories off you and sent them to China, and you paid for it through your taxes, by the way, through agreements, through World Trade Organization at the United Nations. And now that the service economy is going down the tubes, now youíre going into a Green Economy. It means, if youíre lucky, youíll be eating grass, maybe. And it says:)
and reform of the international institutions responsible for sustainable development. This second "reform" strand could feasibly restructure everything ranging from the U.N. Environmental Program (UNEP) and the U.N. Development Program to the 500 different multilateral environmental treaties (A: 500 different multilateral environmental treaties) and agreements currently in place.
(A: They want to add to them, triple them, quadruple them.)
These cover toxic chemicals, ocean conservation, (A: No fishing and so on.) biodiversity, desertification, climate change, ozone depletion, forest protection, (A: Meaning no more firewood.) and more. Given the rising trends of global temperature...
(A: Which is all baloney, as we well know. They say they have a good chance of pushing it all through.)
Hopefully RIO+20 will deliver a jolt of political will to the global environmental agenda, as well as a smart plan to get the planet back on track.
Well, whose track are they talking about, because, you see, weíve never been asked about any of this. We just have these big private organizations that are funded by the big foundations, massive foundations, with trillions of dollars, with NGO armies that lobby. We get no say in this at all. Democracy, I donít think so. Back after this.
Hi folks, weíre back, and weíre Cutting Through the Matrix. And I wonít read any more of that Guardian rubbish, because, you see, the big bankers want to bring in a world state of poverty, the global plantation. They want to continue to constantly give whatís left of any work at all or industry to other countries across the world to help equalize things, you understand. And youíll come down to their level. Theyíll come up to your level, somewhere in the middle, in between, maybe in the paddy field, I donít know. But thatís really what they want. And this is to be a world where weíre all basically powerless to feed ourselves. This is what theyíre bringing in. Or to do anything ourselves. Weíll need permission for everything. Just for existing weíll be penalized. And the Guardian thinks this is wonderful. Mind you, theyíre well paid to do that too, and also the organizations which they also work for, not just the papers, because these reporters work for higher organizations. Hereís an article too:
EPA Whistleblower Criticizes Global Warming in Peer-Reviewed Study
(A: The other side of the nonsense. You see, everything is hinging on global warming, which has actually fallen flat on its face. And all of these laws that they want to ram through are based on the theory of global warming and the destruction of the environment and so on, by us, of course. Itís all your fault, you see. Again, the abuser always blames the victim. So it says:)
The scientific hypotheses underlying global warming alarmism are overwhelmingly contradicted by real-world data, and for that reason economic studies on the alleged benefits of controlling greenhouse gas emissions are baseless. Thatís the finding of a new peer-reviewed report by a former EPA whistleblower.
(A: And it goes through a bit of his history in the EPA, where he was penalized for not giving them the sort of stuff they wanted to hear. He was using factual data, and of course, thereís nothing factual about the agenda. Itís all make-believe, but itís got to go through, otherwise they lose control.)
Dr. Alan Carlin, now retired, was a career environmental economist at EPA when CEI (Competitive Enterprise Institute) broke the story of his negative report on the agencyís proposal to regulate greenhouse gases in June, 2009. Dr. Carlinís supervisor had ordered him to keep quiet about the report and to stop working on global warming issues. EPAís attempt to silence Dr. Carlin became a highly-publicized embarrassment to the agency, given Administrator Lisa Jacksonís supposed commitment to transparency.
(A: Right? Transparency as they penalize the people for telling what they see is the truth.)
Dr. Carlinís new study, A Multidisciplinary, Science-Based Approach to the Economics of Climate Change, is published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. It finds that fossil fuel use has little impact on atmospheric CO2 levels. Moreover, the claim that atmospheric CO2 has a strong positive feedback effect on temperature is contradicted on several grounds, ranging from low atmospheric sensitivity to volcanic eruptions, to the lack of ocean heating and the absence of a predicted tropical ďhot spot.Ē
So, he goes through all the factual data, but the factual data, as I say, doesnít matter when thereís a big agenda riding on all this stuff. Just much like the Rio Summit used the similar stuff back in their day, and will, again, reiterate it, and give you more laws in 2012 at the next meeting. They need this global warming trash to basically make you give up all your rights. And then when you get thrown off your rural areas and so on, and crammed into these big cities, up to the year 2050, when weíre all supposed to start dying off very quickly, then theyíll have their wonderful Utopia in the future, for the real boys, who really own the world, who donít give a darn about the environment, since after all, you see, they own the big businesses across the world that are actually criticizing themselves. Interesting, great technique isnít it? Great technique.
Why do you think all the big international corporations are on board at the Copenhagen Treaty and so on? Theyíre all on board for all of this stuff. They all want carbon taxes. Rothschild himself put forth the bill in Britain for carbon taxes, and through the United Nations, because their private bank in Switzerland will actually get the honor of having it all funneled through his bank. Can you imagine the interest, just stuff going in there overnight from all over the world? Thatís how the world is really run, eh? Moneyboys run the world, and no politician dares oppose them, because they all belong to the bankers. Thatís who put them in there.
And Iíll put this link up tonight as well, and another article too Iím putting up tonight is from Al Jazeera. Itís about Glencore, this big corporation. It says:
The rapid rise in prices for food, fuel and commodities has been disastrous for the world's poor, including Indonesian market vendor Lia Romi. But it's a bonanza for multinational trading firms such as Glencore.
While Romi has trouble feeding her family, Glencore - the world's largest diversified commodities trader - is planning a US$11billion share sale, likely the largest market debut ever seen on the London Stock Exchange.
"The price for our daily food has at least doubled in the past two years," Lia Romi told Al Jazeera through a translator. "Food costs 100 per cent of my family's daily income [of about $3].Ē
While Romi, and millions like her, worry about feeding their families,
(A: Donít worry, the United Nations are going to help you. Yeah.)
the initial public offering from the commodity speculating giant will create at least four billionaires, dozens worth more than $100 million and several hundred old fashioned millionaires. Chief Executive Ivan Glasenberg is set to make more than $9bn from the share sale. And speculating on food prices is an important part of his wealth.
(A: See, all your food now is getting tossed around on the big global market. And they actually have hedge funds too, and other funds, where they can speculate on. Itís interesting, isnít it? I mean, Rothschild bought over, apart from farms all over the world and all through India, through corporate farming and brought in the GM stuff all over the world too, Rothschild also bought over the Weather Channel. Because now theyíre speculating on bad crops coming, to put the prices up even higher. Wonderful, isnít it? The same guys that crash your banking system and rip you off, are now controlling all the food, and your politicians let it be that way. Shouldnít you ensure that you have your own farmers, who first and foremost will sell to their own people? Huh? Well they canít be interdependent at the same time and look after our own people, obviously, in this interdependent world, can we? Itís a ridiculous idea. Total control of the planet. Anyway, it says:)
Valued at about $60 billion, Glencore controls 50 per cent of the global copper market, 60 per cent of zinc, 38 per cent in alumina, 28 per cent of thermal coal, 45 per cent of lead and almost 10 per cent of the world's wheat - according to information the firm disclosed prior to its share sale. It also controls about one quarter of the world market in barley, sunflower and rape seed.
"They are possibly one of very few mining companies that are price makers, rather than price takers," said Chris Hinde, editorial director of Mining Journal magazine. "They are the stockbrokers of the commodities business [operating] in a fairly secretive world. They are effectively setting the price for some very important commodities," he told Al Jazeera.
The firm employs about 57,000 people, generated a turnover of $145 billion in the past year and has assets worth more than $79 billion. Glencore's media department refused interview requests from Al Jazeera.
(A: And youíll find, of course, Glencore is a front company for the very same people Iíve been mentioning earlier on, because theyíre all involved, this big club at the top. And they have many, many, many, many front companies. Many of them. It says:)
Based in Baar, Switzerland, (A: I guess probably right next to their bank, actually, the Rothschild one.) where regulation is minimal, the company's sprawling interests span Bolivian tin mines, Angolan oil, zinc producers in Kazakhstan, Zambian copper mines and Russian wheat operations.
Iíll put this link up too, and you can read all the rest of it too, and wonder how corporations can get so incredibly huge. And also tonight, I wanted to put up a bit of hilarity on Hillary. Because sometimes Hillary is hilarious. And sheís not the most popular person, Hillary Clinton. And some people can get away with things, certain people can get away with things. And itís quite funny, really. It says:
Hasidic Newspaper Defends Airbrushing Hillary Clinton Out of Photograph
(A: Now that would really set well with her, because I remember, one of the security staff who came out and wrote a book about his days with Hillary and Bill at the White House, he said she was a tyrant. Always cursing and swearing and yelling at everybody. And she even told all the staff that they were to look down when they spoke to her, and never look her in the eye. Thatís the Royal technique. In fact, itís still pretty well promoted. When youíre going to meet the Queen, youíre told not to stare in her eyes. You should see the old movie, itís quite funny too. Itís called the Madness of King George, who actually went crazy, and what happened to him. And that was part of it. Are you looking me in the eye, sir? That was almost a capital offence. So anyway:)
Hasidic Newspaper Defends Airbrushing Hillary Clinton Out of Photograph
On Friday, the Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper Di Tzeitung ran the now-famous photo of President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and others in the White House Situation Room. Just one problem: In Di Tzeitung's version, Hillary Clinton wasn't there. Neither was Director for Counterterrorism Audrey Tomason, the only other woman in the shot. Di Tzeitung had airbrushed them out.
(A: Itís great eh. People you just canít stand, you just airbrush them out, and thatís it. Itís kind of like what Stalin did. You know, the photographs of the top Politburo every year, and every year or so there was a couple of them missing. And the next year another couple. And they just filled in the background.)
This is, evidently, editorial policy at the paper--Di Tzeitung never runs photos of women, because such images could be "sexually suggestive."
(A: They must be joking. Hillary?)
But the removal of Clinton and Tomason made the media sit up and take notice. "Apparently the presence of a woman, any woman, being all womanly and sexy all over the United States' counterterrorism efforts was too much for the editors of Der Tzitung to handle," scoffed Morning Gloria at Jezebel.
(A: Another paper I guess.)
The writer Taylor Marsh called it "unethical" and "unacceptable ... The people who made the decision to rewrite U.S. history, including the publisher of Der Tzitung, have shown themselves to be part of the problem in this world."
Rabbi Jason Miller at The Jewish Week criticized the move on theological grounds: "Der Tzitung edited Hillary Clinton out of the photo, thereby changing history. To my mind, this act of censorship is actually a violation of the Jewish legal principle of g'neivat da'at (deceit)." And Miller pointed out that the manipulated photo might violate man's law as well as God's: the White House made the photo available with the disclaimer that it "may not be manipulated in any way."
So, anyway, the paper who did it, the fundamentalists, got back to them, and they rationalized why they had to do it. You know, youíve got to admit it, they give everyone the finger, and they get away with it. And thatís how everyone should really be, you know. So, itís quite a hilarious article, and you can have a look at it yourself. I mean, as I say, Hillary is not the most popular person in the world. She and Madeline Albright go across the world stirring up more wars against all the Muslim countries. And Iím sure of course sheíll be like an angry woman at a divorce on this one, kind of like, after all Iíve done for you. But thatís how it will be. Itís quite amazing.
Now, another article too is:
Krystian Zimerman's shocking Disney Hall debut
Poland's Krystian Zimerman, widely regarded as one of the finest pianists in the world,
(A: This was 2009, by the way. Iím talking about people who stand up for what they think is right.)
created a furor Sunday night in his debut at Walt Disney Concert Hall when he announced this would be his last performance in America because of the nation's military policies overseas.
Before playing the final work on his recital, Karol Szymanowskiís "Variations on a Polish Folk Theme," Zimerman sat silently at the piano for a moment, almost began to play, but then turned to the audience. In a quiet but angry voice that did not project well, he indicated that he could no longer play in a country whose military wants to control the whole world.
ďGet your hands off of my country,Ē he said. He also made reference to the U.S. military detention camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(A: That was back then of course, in Cuba.† Now theyíve got them elsewhere.)
About 30 or 40 people in the audience walked out, some shouting obscenities. ďYes,Ē he answered, ďsome people when they hear the word military start marching.Ē
(A: And itís true enough, isnít it?)
Others remained but booed or yelled for him to shut up and play the piano. But many more cheered. Zimerman responded by saying that America has far finer things to export than the military, and he thanked those who support democracy.
(A: Thereís very few of them, I guess.)
For the first half of the recital, Zimerman had played a Bach Partita and Beethovenís last piano sonata, Opus 111, with firm determination.
(A: Anyway, it says here, of course, the US Security had attacked him before, because of his views, and he travels with his own Steinway Piano. And it says:)
But shortly after 9/11, the instrument was confiscated at JFK Airport when he landed in New York to give a recital at Carnegie Hall.
(A: And this is their excuse that they used for destroying his piano. They did destroy it.)
Thinking the glue smelled funny, the TSA decided to take no chances and destroyed the instrument.
(A: Can you imagine destroying a pianistís instrument? Thatís called spite, folks. Spite. And the order came from above, obviously.)
Since then he has shipped his pianos in parts, which he reassembles by hand after he lands. He also drives the truck himself when he carries his instrument from city to city over land, as he did after playing a recital in Berkeley on Friday.
Anyway, he said heíd never be back to the US, because of its military policies of trying to dominate the planet, but he should be educated on whoís really running America, and what the global plans are. Because the average American citizen is getting nothing out of this. Theyíre getting whacked and decimated financially. Thatís what theyíre getting.
And thereís quite a few other articles I might manage to try and get in. Thereís one person on the line, actually, or two. Iíll maybe try that first. Thereís Kay from California on the line. Are you there, Kay?
Kay: Yes, hi. Hi, Alan. I had a couple of questions. First I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoy your show. Itís an educational show, or broadcast, I donít know. Itís not really a show. But I had a question that I was wondering if you could help me with. I donít know if it was this program or something else I was listening to, where it was talking about drug companies have a trust fund thatís set there by the politicians, so that if they get sued, they donít actually pay money. It comes out of the trust thatís set there by taxpayers?† Thatís true?
Alan: It is true. I think Dr. Mercola has a website, and he goes into all the histories of the big Pharma, in great detail in fact, and he goes through lots and lots of what theyíre up to, and the cons and scams. Thereís so many scams Pharma has, because itís the same with Monsanto, itís all part of the same business. You canít, Monsanto for instance, are the only ones allowed to give the reports on their own chemicals they use for their own plants. You canít as an independent inquirer do a test and get it published, or they can sue you for testing them. So theyíve got the laws changed, so no matter what they say, thatís going to be put down as the gospel, and you canít test. And if you find out anything nasty about it, you canít publish it. Itís the same with the big Pharma too. Big Pharma, and Iíve done some articles on them, and I even mentioned a link to one of the videos that are up there, where they hire their own writers to give them glowing reports on each medication they come up with. And theyíre told to only put in all the good stuff, and never mention the bad stuff, the side effects and all the rest of it, or the deaths, or whatever. And this particular video went through quite a lot of that. It also went through some of the people who are involved in doing this business for Pharma. In one of them, one of these articles they actually said that to get a pill through, they said, donít worry about it, weíve got our own guys inside the Food and Drug Administration, and then he named off the doctors who were on the payroll for this big Pharma company who work at the federal Food and Drug Administration. I mean, thereís nothing passed for your benefit. Itís all big money, big moneyís benefit. Back after this.
Hi folks, weíre back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And, what Iíll do, Kay, is Iíll put up some links tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and then you can do a whole journey into the mass of information that is out there by independent groups and so on, who have done their studies on big Pharma, and it will show you the incredible scams that go on all the time. And itís covered up. Now, Iíll try and fit in Kenny from Scotland, if heís there. Are you there, Kenny?
Kenny: Hello, Alan.
Alan: How are you doing?
Kenny: Oh, youíre there? Fantastic. Hey, Alan, itís just to say, Iím not going to eat up too much time, because this phone call is costing a fortune, as you can imagine, but itís just to personally thank you, Alan. Iím a long-time listener, and itís just to personally thank you for all the work that youíre doing just now. And you know youíre spreading the truth, I donít want to say youíre a hero, because thatís the wrong word to use, but you know, youíre right up there. And itís just, Iíve really nothing specific to say to you Alan.
Alan: Where are you in Scotland?
Kenny: Iím in Glasgow.
Alan: Youíre in Glasgow, eh. Whatís the price of gasoline there, petrol, right now?
Kenny: Oh, I donít know. I donít drive.
Alan: Ah, you probably canít afford it, right? Yeah.
Kenny: Well, I canít afford it, yeah. I mean, youíve got the road tax and then youíve got whatever else on top of that. And so, I donít, Iím not really into the driving and all that kind of thing. But, Iíve got to say, Alan, the advice you give about reading the big boysí books themselves, has really helped me in my experience.
Alan: Yes. Itís the only way to learn.
Kenny: I walk around, I walk around with a kind of robo-head on, as I think youíve mentioned before, most of the sort of time. It does get you down and that, but itís just to let the other folk out there know, there is a way out. You can get out. You can get out. Iím planning on getting out of this city, and out of this culture that Iíve been brought up into, and just sort of move on, away from it all.
Alan: Yes. You have to try. You have to try and get out of it, because itís just going to get worse. Itís planned to get worse as you can see. And your media Iím sure is giving you nothing but bad news, day after day, to get you all ready for it.
Kenny: Oh, yes. Itís constant. But Alan, it was just to thank you for the advice that you give.
Alan: I appreciate that. I appreciate that.
Kenny: Everything you do, and I will be sending a donation. As you can appreciate yourself, itís tough times on everyone.
Alan: I know. I know.
Kenny: So, Iíll be sending a donation, and I urge everyone else out there to send donations in to you. And thatís pretty much all I really wanted to say, Alan. Iíve got no specific questions.
Alan: Well, thatís good enough Kenny. Well, you take care of yourself. And feed yourself as best as you can, and get out of the city if you can, as well, because itís going to be awfully hard as they go ahead with this agenda, as you know.
Kenny: I just want to advise everyone to just get out of the cities. I mean, it is crazy when you think about it. I mean, even just in Scotland, I travel around the country quite a lot, and those vast areas, those vast areas, thereís plenty of land out there, and weíre all crammed into these cities with the illusion that thereís some sort of overcrowding.
Alan: Yes. And actually, Iíve got more reports here, Kenny that they want to do the same across the world. Thereís even articles in the paper today, where Germany is losing all of its rural population. Theyíre all getting pushed into the cities. Itís for the whole world. And thatís where they want us all. Thanks for calling in, Kenny. And cheerio, as they say in Scotland. Take care of yourself. From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada, itís Good Night, and may your God or your Gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
Rare Quigley Interview on RIIA and CFR---Talks on Their Banking Power and Geopolitics, World Domination etc..
Global Governance for the 21st. Century---RIIA/CFR
UN, Libya and Sour Grapes over Refugees
5 Dollar ATM Fees Coming
Next Rio Summit for Global Socialism, Massive Poverty by "Green Economy" and even Larger Bureaucracy ---Rio 2012
EPA Whistleblower Criticizes Global Warming
Now you See Her--Now You Don't--Hillary Clinton Airbrushed Out of Photograph
International Pianist Announces He Will Never Again Perform in USA
Demise of Rural Germany
Exposťs on Big Pharma and its Ties with Government and Gov. Agencies:
Dr. Healy Telling How Medicine is Pharma-Driven. Gives a little History of How Doctors and Public are Fooled
The Dangerous Partnership between Government and Big Pharma
Vaccine Education--Pros and Cons for Educated Choices
Serious Disabling Vaccine Side-Effects-UK
Taxpayers on hook for any H1N1 vaccine damages--Canada
Government compensation for vaccine-damaged children
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program