Feb. 8, 2011 (#764)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 8, 2011:
Survival of the Fittest = Progression of Aggression:
"Eugenics, Economics, The Legacy of Darwin
Mixed with Marx Will Leave Us Starvin',
For Their Religion's Based on Pure Survival
By Evolution and Superior Arrival,
David of Yore Hired Many a Psalmer
Who Praised Him Up for Being a Charmer,
To Justify His Most Exalted Station
Over Inferior Beings, Not in Equation,
Modern Elitists Self-Justify Using Eugenics,
Using Grant-Guzzling Professors, Praising Heredics,
Rationalizing Intellect of Each Worthy Daughter
Who Births Cunning, Deceit and Slaughter"
© Alan Watt Feb. 8, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 8, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 8, 2011. Newcomers, I suggest you go into my web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the audios; there are hundreds of them to choose from. I try to give you shortcuts to the big picture and it is complex, really. As I say, this system is a new world order. Itís been here for a long time, in fact. We are simply going through one phase of its new world order right now as we go into the big transformation from one type of society to the next type of world global society. Of course itís mixed with eugenics and all the rest of it too; thatís all part of it. So help yourself to the audios. Remember, all of the sites you will see listed on the .com site have transcripts in English as well for download, for print up. You can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, listed on the .com site as well, where you can choose other languages for print up, and pass them around to your friends, hopefully. Remember, you are the audience that bring me to you so kindly purchase the books and the disks that I have for sale. That will help me keep going. [Order and donation options listed above.] On the web site there is a whole bunch of other sites Iíve got listed. These are the official sites because Iíve had trouble in the past where sometimes they get pulled with no reason at all and youíve always got another site to download from. If you find sticking downloads at the .com site itís because so many folk go in at the same time and download, so you can try these alternate sites that Iíve got listed there. You should bookmark them for future use just in case.
We are going through the biggest transformation now, where science has been replacing all the old Gods and putting itself up as a God, of course. You just say Ďexpertí now and everyone obeys an expert. It doesnít matter who they are or if they even are an expert, or scientist, and thatís good enough for all of us and away we go. Governments of course are behind them all the way with all their new theories and their new fads, etc, pushing them on the public as though they are Gods. Weíre being trained that this is the new system, they are the new priesthood and weíre supposed to obey them. Of course, the scientists donít go off by themselves shooting in the dark. Theyíre all controlled; theyíre all funded by the same handful of people really, and foundations for all the researching. The ones who fund them know what they want to hear. They know what they want to do with the world. And especially of all, they know what theyíre going to do with people across the whole world. Depopulation for their big utopia is a big, big part of it, controlling of the MIND is a big part of it, for those who are still alive today, although people are becoming infertile; most of them have been sterilized whether they know it or not Ė according to all the reports that come out, in the Western world especially. Out of it eventually theyíll have a new type of human, very much like the Brave New World scenario that Aldous Huxley talked about in his book. Thatís where they plan to go. At the moment, as I say, itís a matter of controlling us, using our tax money to build the structure for the new society as we go along. Thatís what itís all about, and of course redistribution of wealth is a big part of that across the world. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. This system in which we live has always been dominated by a Ďdominant elite,í sometimes called a Ďdominant minorityí in academia. People like Aldous Huxley talked about that; he called them Ďthe dominant minorityí. He said at Berkeley when he gave a talk there, that there had always been a dominant minority running the people and he didnít see any reason why it would continue off into the future. In other words, democracy and so on, wasnít even mentioned, it wasnít discussed at all. It was kind of an irrelevant thing, and technically it is an irrelevant thing because what you are given as democracy is a sham. Itís nothing but a sham to keep you working away and happy, and giving yourselfÖ you give your power to the people who you think are governing you. You give them legal power over you to do as they will. If you havenít learned your lessons by now, then I guess you never will. The older you get, regardless of the type of government they claim they are, theyíre all the same, exactly the same because there is only one agenda and they know where theyíre going with it.
Eugenics and economics have always been tied up completely together. You canít separate one from the other. Everything to do in this system, weíre told, is to do with economics. The bad news is always tax rises all the time, to do with new programs or military spending or whatever it happens to be, or welfare, and this is basically tied in with the whole idea of investing and eugenics. Because anyone investing in any area or country, or a group of countries, must know how the population behaves. How are they? Are they good workers? Are they fit? Are they healthy? Are they sickly? Öetc, etc. Thatís always been the way of it. When you go back into the old writings of John Stuart Mill, and then his son of the same name, they had that wrapped in with their theories and their predictions, completely intertwined together, the fitness of a people. In other words, how well can they produce on my behalf if Iím going to invest money there, because the whole profit motive is behind investment. Itís not to do with giving anybody work, believe you me, and also to do with the mentality of the people.
Every nation and the character of every people has been well documented and recorded on behalf of economics and the economists are really into this kind of stuff. So are the militaries too, of all countries. They want to know the personality types, the prevailing culture and mentality of a people. Will they run away from a battle? Are they persistent in battle even when they lose the first few, etc? Do they win and then give up on the first time they lose? All of that stuff has been so well documented. Itís rather incredible really Ė only incredible when you realize that you donít exist to serve yourself or those around you. You exist to serve the economy, and thatís taught as fact today. Thatís why when they come out in the newspapers and even talking about the cost of keeping a welfare state, or the cost of keeping a National Health Service, itís basically taking it away from the profit motive and it doesnít look so healthy when other peoples want to invest in your area or country, that is if you think youíve got a country left. So you just canít separate the two.
Then we find people like Malthus, who was basically an economist, who worked for the British government AND for the various companies and corporations of his day, the British East India Company. He also went across to the Dutch East India Company. He basically was a European advisor to all these big corporations of the past that blossomed into other things, even empires. He of course worked out even the calorific intake for food for the public, or those who were working on their plantations, just enough to keep them working, producing on an efficient level, but not too healthy that they could run away at the end of the evening, or when they were given their 4 or 5 hours of sleep before they got up to work the next day. It was that perfected to do with diet. It has never changed really.
So Darwin came along, of course Darwin mixed with Marxism and the two of them went flying off into creating this whole Marxist theory of evolution and the evolution of man himself into something great and a superman to come, the Uberman; all that stuff came from the two theories combining. Personally I think they were both fronting for something else; there is a trace of something else behind them both and preexisting them down through history to the present time. We had the communist era where they were trying to create the Soviet Man and then with the Nazi era where they were trying to create the Superman of Germany, of the Aryan type. Both of these things, really the ideas were born in London, England, in The City of London; they call it The City, which is a sovereign entity unto itself, with its own laws and rules, especially financial rules for the banks that are based there, the main banks are based there.
Itís interesting too that even employment and unemployment is mixed in with economics, because youíd think that Ė most folk do in their simplicity, do think that Ė governments are there to not impede the progress of job creation. Governments donít create jobs except for those who are employed by government and believe you me, there are lots of them these days. Otherwise, government is a drain on everything. They are a consumer of taxation. Private companies of course, are the only ones that can possibly create any kind of lasting worthwhile jobs, especially if theyíre in production, actual production of something. But if everyone was fully employed, they claim in economics, the cost of labor would increase because employers would have to bribe folk to leave their existing jobs and come to them. So they always say theyíve got to have a good pool of unemployed people; thatís standard economics in all government theories. So they make sure youíve got a welfare state of some kind and a good pool of people you can pull from to keep wages low because then itís an employersí market, as they say; they can offer you whatever they want to. Most folk live through their lives never really thinking about these things because itís not pushed except in academia and the students who are going into those particular areas who end up working as economists, in the area of controlling the rest of the public down below them.
Their big dream of course was to create a society where everyone would simply obey, and be fairly healthy but obey. They didnít want everyone to have equal intellect, believe you me, through eugenics for instance. They did not want that. They didnít want competition. A world where all the rest of those kinds, those kinds down below them, you know the inferior types, could match them in the future, was something of a horror to contemplate by those who already held onto the reins of power. Plus they understood through big think tanks and world meetings they had, prior to the 1930s, they would need a base of people who could toil and work in factories, and could toil in the soil, etc, without getting bored stiff and walking off. You need people with determination, who can stick at it, and endure hardship, and rotten climates and rotten weather and all the rest of it, and keep the food growing and production going. They themselves had said that the higher the intellect the harder it is to stay on at a boring job. So they knew that and thatís why we find that Aldous Huxley in Brave New World had the different created type, in-vitro fertilization type, of alpha pluses and then alphas and all the way down to the lowly classes, that simply were bred not to have too much of a mind that would wander; they would be quite happy doing repetitive jobs. Thatís always been the ideal of the Great Society, as they call it; they have many terms for the same thing. And their utopic vision, like A Modern Utopia, the book written by HG Wells, where the inferior types are eventually eliminated off; theyíre just simply eliminated out of the picture through sterilization of one kind or another. Then of course they have their beautiful utopia where everyone knows what theyíre supposed to do, work at, and no one tries to better themselves into a higher class. A rigid system.
At the moment weíre going through the sterilization process, of covert sterilization, thatís not even investigated. Apparently, itís not even worthwhile to find out why since 1950 the sperm count has fallen by about 85% in the Western males. Nothing happens, if we have been here millions of years, as they claim, nothing happens by itself, suddenly. And surely medicine itself looks at diseases and the course of them, like any detective story; what has changed in the last 50-60 years or so? What has changed? Then you can find out the causes. We know the inoculations came in big time then. We also know that the food, the processing, etc, started to change too. The food now hardly resembles the food of the pre-50s at all, even by taste, never mind texture and so on.
But the geneticists never stopÖ never, ever stop. There is a good documentary to see, and Iíll preface this, this particular documentary, by mentioning that The Philosophical Society, which is a Freemasonic society, put it out. It goes through the Soviet system. It goes through the English system. It goes through the eugenics societies in America that preceded all of them in fact, through the Rockefeller Foundation at Cold Spring Harbor where they had their big headquarters for eugenics and they sterilized so many people in the different states of the US itís just incredible. It went on into the 70s, from the 1920s. This particular documentary was put out by a Freemasonic society, and there is no condemnation of it, by the way, when you hear it mentioned.† Very good documentary footage on it but there is no condemnation, because in Freemasonry, even for those who donít know at the bottom level Ė and they really donít know much at all at the bottom level. They are the outer portico that Albert Pike talked about; they donít know much at all. But the upper levels, they know; thatís part of their particular theory as well, that man is evolving and those that get into the high degrees are superior to those who canít make it into them. Itís actually a eugenics society, whether they have caught on to that or not. But the ones at the top certainly do know itís a eugenics society; they talk about inferior and superior types. Of course, they think itís an innate thing in mankind himself to try and get to a higher level of understanding. The documentary is called Architecture of Doom and Iíll put a link up for that tonight after the show. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back, Cutting Through The Matrix. After World War II of course, with the racial hygiene programs as it was called in Germany, eugenics got a bad name. So they had to alter themselves into something else of course, really transformed themselves into another entity, under more science and they call themselves bioethicists now. Of course, bioethicists, whatís correct and what is not correct; should we kill these folk, should we not kill these folk Ė and they toss the coins back and forth. Bioethics is a big thing today and itís taught in all the big universities but itís the same as eugenics, plain and simple.
They never give up of course, on this wonderful utopia because theyíre funded by the biggest foundations on the planet. You have to remember too that Russia, Soviet Russia was socialist, and that Germany was socialist, even though they call it fascism, itís the same darned thing as far as Iím concerned. They both had the same programs on the go. They both believed in the evolution of man. They also believed, especially in Russia, that the Lamarckian Theory of Evolution was a major step, where you could condition people to pass on traits, you could actually condition them to pass on traits to their offspring. Then of course, the Mendelian Theory took over and thatís prevalent today. In other words, you are simply a product of your genetic makeup and thatís all you can ever be. Thatís the one that won out today.
There are many fronts for the eugenics societies. The Human Genome Project was as amazing front that was well funded again.† You have the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)/Royal Institute of International Affairs involved, the European Institute of International Affairs Ė theyíre all the same bunch. I hope you realize that too Ė the big bankers at the top, and you also have the foundations, the Rockefeller Foundations and Ford, Carnegie, etc, a whole host of foundations to do with eugenics basically, pushing a socialist world to give governments more control and ultimately the right to decide who can breed and who will not breed. Thatís the purpose of it at the moment. And they use lovely cons. One of the eugenicists is a man who heads up The Human Genome Project. Heís the boss and heís come out with a new test, supposedly, and here is how itís worded. This is a handout to all the newspapers, a complete handout from the guys who are pushing this.
New genetic test for severe childhood diseases
(Alan: So it sounds legit; itís a test FOR severe illness.
It doesnít say that it MIGHT find, or possibly might, or anything like that. No.)
Couples are to be offered a simple test to stop them passing on
any of more than 500 genetic diseases to their children.
(A: Right. So that sounds very concrete in its wording.)
telegraph.co.uk / By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent /12 Jan 2011
The blood test that costs £400 per person could be available in months and eliminate hereditary illnesses such as cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anaemia. (A: So it says, could be available Ö the Ďcouldí only applies to the availability of it. But it says, and eliminate hereditary illnesses, so itís going to eliminate, they claim, right.)
But it is also controversial because critics claim it could lead to a new form of eugenics. (A: Itís the same form of eugenics, with the usual priesthood, you know, white coats, behind it.)
Parents with a risk could ask for embryos to be screened out through IVF treatment or abortion if they were at risk of passing on a serious disease. (A: Now, Iíve read on the air here articles in the past where people were advised to have abortions because of possibilities of things; then they found that their children were perfectly healthy when they went ahead and didnít abort. It makes you wonder how many other ones would be healthy too. Because these screening tests are pretty well rubbishy, they cannot tell if you are going to have that disease or not. They cannot tell that. But you wouldnít think so if you read thisÖ itís really an AD handout, an advertisement, just handed out to all the newspapers, that put it right in their papers, quite happy to have some filler space, and of course there is no inquiry into it, or the guy who heads it up, on his past and his history too. You can look it up on Wikipedia for yourself, the Human Genome Project, and this article, and youíll find out who that is.)
A "pre-conception" genetic test could be used routinely by doctors to screen for severe, recessively inherited childhood diseases in couples before they have children, reports a new study.
Those with a family history of conditions such as cystic fibrosis and fragile X syndrome (A: Thatís when you end up in these strange movies, called the X-movies.) are already entitled to screening on the National Health Service. (A: But theyíre not, theyíre definitely not very reliable at all.)
Already tests are available for 100 or so diseases in the private sector but now with more powerful gene screening equipment scientists have extended the range.
The new test, developed by the National Center For Genome Resources in New Mexico. . . (A: Ö and ya-da, ya-da, ya, etc.)
It sounds all so wonderful and for safety, for safety; who wants somebody who doesnít measure up to whatís supposed to be the norm? and why not just abort it, or ALLOW them, allow them, if youíve got extra cash, to take those genes out and replace them with PROPER genes? you know, the proper type, you see. Thatís really what eugenics is all about. Itís the same thing with the poor, etc. Itís not that they want to bring down the whole human race. They want to bring down the WRONG KIND of people, thatís what they have said in the past. Thatís what Charles Galton Darwin said himself in the 1950s, the wrong kindÖ the wrong kind will outbreed the better kind, you see, the ones who are more psychopathic and know how to fight to get up there into positions of power and wealth by ripping everybody else off, because thatís all Darwinism is. Survival of the Fittest is the most cunning and utterly ruthless, with less conscience. If youíve got a conscience you canít get up there; you canít do it. So Iíll put this article up tonight, all of these articles up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can look it up for yourself. Hereís another article today as well, JournalNow.com. It saysÖ
Victims of forced sterilization are hurting and dying off
(A: This is in the United States, the forced sterilization program of eugenics of the past.)
By JournalNow Staff | Journal Editorials / www2.journalnow.com / January 23, 2011
I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about eugenics just to kick the show off really because itís in the news, and how theyíre going ahead with it under, again, the better science, theyíre BETTER now at eugenics than they used to be. They hate the term eugenics, they want to help civilization and help society by basically having the right to tamper with your genes and the sperm and the ovum and all the rest of it, and decide who should live and die basically. Thatís always been their program. And yet here isÖ
Victims of forced sterilization are hurting and dying off
(A: Öbecause they had this forced sterilization, not just in the US, they had it in Canada too, especially for American Indians.)
As the state legislature convenes Wednesday, Gov. Bev Perdue should present it with a clear plan for helping the surviving victims of North Carolina's forced sterilization program. Some might argue that, with the legislature facing the challenge of closing a $3.7-billion budget shortfall, this is not the time to help those victims. (A: Economics again isnít it, eh?) But with the victims continuing to suffer with physical and emotional ills from their operations, and with some of them having died waiting for help, the state has a moral obligation to finally right the wrong it visited upon them.
Well you see, there is no moral right when it comes to economics. Itís a very bland straight up and down affair. This article goes on about some of the history of the eugenics movement and the compulsory sterilization, because they had programs for the perfect American family, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation of course from the very beginning. They helped to get that through most of the US states. It ran from the í20s right through into the í70s, and they want to go back to it again. So Iíll put that up as well.
Hereís another article that ties right in with it too. This is a repetition of studies they do all the time to make sure that people ARE kept pretty dumb, at the bottom, because theyíre kept dumb even by the junk food that they eat. It saysÖ
Junk food diet may lower kids' IQ, study suggests
CTV.ca News Staff / Feb. 8 2011
Well, they have done this for as long as Iíve been alive. They know darn well what it does to the public. They know darn well what kind of diet a child needs when itís growing and what happens to its mind, its brain, if it doesnít get the proper diet. So another study just to make sure theyíre on target with keeping enough of the population at the bottom pretty low on the totem pole of the IQ, they claim.
At the same time we get all of this too, they go on about the welfare state, the welfare state, but the biggest welfare goes to the corporations. Thatís where the real welfare state is. We just bailed out the banks for goodness sake; these were cash gifts. These were complete gifts to them. Billions and trillions of bucks across the planet and they donít have to pay that back, eh. And now theyíre all giving themselves, in no time at all, billions of dollars in bonuses at the end of the year. This saysÖ
To us, it's an obscure shift of tax law. To the City, (A: Thatís the City of London, the banking city, the square mile.) it's the heist of the century
In David Cameron we have a leader whose job is to quietly legitimise a semi-criminal, money-laundering economy
George Monbiot guardian.co.uk, Monday 7 February 2011 / guardian.co.uk
'I would love to see tax reductions," David Cameron told the Sunday Telegraph at the weekend, "but when you're borrowing 11% of your GDP, it's not possible to make significant net tax cuts. It just isn't." Oh no? Then how come he's planning the biggest and crudest corporate tax cut in living memory?
If you've heard nothing of it, you're in good company. The obscure adjustments the government is planning to the tax acts of 1988 and 2009 have been missed by almost everyone Ė and are, anyway, almost impossible to understand without expert help. (A: And thatís true isnít it? They make everything very complicated to make you think, well only experts understand this. When that happens, you know youíre being ripped off. Something so simple should stay simple.) But as soon as you grasp the implications, you realise that a kind of corporate coup d'etat is taking place.
Like the dismantling of the NHS and the sale of public forests, no one voted for this measure, as it wasn't in the manifestos. While Cameron insists that he occupies the centre ground of British politics, that he shares our burdens and feels our pain, he has quietly been plotting with banks and businesses to engineer the greatest transfer of wealth from the poor and middle to the ultra-rich that this country has seen in a century. The latest heist has been explained to me by the former tax inspector, now a Private Eye journalist, Richard Brooks and current senior tax staff who can't be named. Here's how it works.
At the moment tax law ensures that companies based here, with branches in other countries, don't get taxed twice on the same money. They have to pay only the difference between our rate and that of the other country. If, for example, Dirty Oil plc pays 10% corporation tax on its profits in Oblivia, (A: Ha, these are just made up.) then shifts the money over here, it should pay a further 18% in the UK, to match our rate of 28%. But under the new proposals, companies will pay nothing at all in this country on money made by their foreign branches. (A: And thatís what free trade is all about, folks. Itís not for you, believe you me.)
Foreign means anywhere. If these proposals go ahead, the UK will be only the second country in the world to allow money that has passed through tax havens to remain untaxed when it gets here. The other is Switzerland. The exemption applies solely to "large and medium companies": it is not available for smaller firms. (A: And thatís what free trade is all about. Itís getting the small guys out of the way, so there is no competition, so the authorized big internationals have the field to themselves.) The government says it expects "large financial services companies to make the greatest use of the exemption regime". The main beneficiaries, in other words, will be the banks.
Öthe big banks, the big big banks, the ones that handle billions per day, in London, the City of London. Then it goes on to explain more of this and how the con game works. But thatís really how it is, isnít it? Itís always been that way. And in the States, the same day, it comes outÖ
Rich Take From Poor as U.S. Subsidy Law Funds Luxury Hotels
bloomberg.com / By David Dietz - Feb 8, 2011 Bloomberg Markets Magazine
Renovation at the Blackstone Hotel in Chicago qualified for a federal subsidy due to the neighborhood's 26 percent poverty rate.
The landmark Blackstone Hotel in downtown Chicago, which has hosted 12 U.S. presidents, opened in 2008 after a two-year, $116 million renovation. Inside the Beaux Arts structure, built in 1910, buffed marble staircases greet guests spending up to $699 a night for rooms with views of Lake Michigan.
Whatís surprising isnít the opulent makeover: Itís how the project was financed. The work was subsidized by a federal development program intended to help poor communities. (A: Doesnít that smack of the same thing the Queen of England was doing when she went into the poverty laws that were meant to help the poor in Britain, to get money to heat her palaces... eh?)
The biggest beneficiary of taxpayer help for the Blackstone revamp was Prudential Financial Inc., the second-largest U.S. life insurer. The company got $15.6 million in tax credits from the U.S. Department of the Treasury for helping to fund the project, according to Chicago city records, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its March issue.
JPMorgan Chase & Co., the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, also took in money by serving as a lender and the monitor of Blackstone construction financing, city records show. (A: See how theyíve got it all worked out together, this big clique at the top?)
Since 2003, some of the worldís biggest financial companies, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., U.S. Bancorp, JPMorgan Chase and Prudential, have taken advantage of a federal subsidy that will cost taxpayers $10.1 billion -- and most of the public has never heard of it.
Investors have used the program, called New Markets Tax Credits, to help build more than 300 upscale projects, including hotels, condominiums, office buildings and a car museum, on streets far from poverty, according to Treasury Department records released through a federal Freedom of Information Act request. (A: And on and on it goes.)
You know itís the same thing everywhere else, in France and in Britain too. In Britain, youíve got all of these Lords who pass the bills for the wind farms and they make sure that their buddies in the same organization, thatís called government, make sure that they get the wind farms put on their land, and they can rake in up to $10,000 each per month on themÖ paid by the taxpayer. Not a bad deal, eh? Not a bad deal, how this wonderful, open democracy works. Itís amazing how these same characters that do all the stealing and cheating use the term democracy when they want to screw more out of you, and get the next step of their plan through. Itís that wonderful? Itís like the US Constitution; these guys trash it amongst themselves. Itís been reported in many, many newspapers what the politicians have said about the Constitution; even Bush Jr derided it too: THAT piece of paper, he says. But when they want to use some of it to further something they want for themselves, oh out it comes all dusted off. Amazing, itís just amazing.
Iím also going to put some more bills up that are going through parliament in the UK, to do with giving more powers to supposedly local councils, deregulating it from the centralized government. Of course, under the guise of how more folk will have more say in their housing in their area and what happens in their area, itís well understood that the local councils, that will run all of this, are going to get these massive cash grants. Wait until you see all of this disappearing into pockets. Itís all run by local business; itís not the people. Thatís where itís going to go. And theyíre utterly corrupt.
Localism Bill 2010-2011
Also an article Iíll put up tonight too isÖ
Communist Capitalism Tightens Grip of EU for World State Model
Posted by Anders under English, Euromed / euro-med.dk / Thu 6 Dec 2007
Itís got awfully good information on the EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (ECFR). Thatís the European branch for the whole of Europe now, from the Council on Foreign Relations; all the top politicians are members. George Soros was the guy who started it up; heís the head of it. This is your wonderful new democracy. Iíll put that up too and you can go through some of the history of these characters. The Rockefellers are mentioned in here, the CFR, and lots of documentation, lots of links to official stuff that you can check up for yourself.
Alan: There are a couple of callers on the line. There is Justin from Ontario. Are you there Justin?
Justin: Hi Alan. Iím up in Thunder Bay, Ontario actually. You mentioned food earlier and I used to work in the produce section of a grocery store and I had many older people tell me that the Macintosh apples, for instance, are not the same as they used to be. Certain things like that, right, how itís generally changed. Iíve heard from other people that the seeds you get to grow your own foods actually will not reproduce themselves as well. Iíve just been checking out your web site and listening to this stuff and noticing things.† I recently drove by a Bank of Montreal, and just like the McDonaldís sign with the line under the ĎMí, noticing it, flipping it around into a number 13 and those kinds of things. Itís quite interesting actually. I donít think thatís, you know, coincidence.
Alan: No, itís not coincidence. Itís not coincidence at all.
Justin: I was just wondering about Nostradamus. Do you have any insight on that situation?
Alan: Well, Nostradamus was built up by the precursor of Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism. He was built up to beÖ like they do today, you make stars. You make stars. When you get away from all of the mystique and the nonsense that has been said about him, he made one main prediction that got him famous and that was to talk about the King being killed in a joust, by I think it was Montgomery from Scotland actually that was over there for a joust. Really the whole thing was a setup. These knights, when you see how they studied and they worked, and they really practiced Ė they could hit a plumb on someoneís hat, on the run, on the gallop Ė and he hit the King in the eye, as weíre told by Nostradamus and that elevated him into power. Then the Kingís wife took over and she was all into the Mystery Religions. So it was all set up to bring up the Mystery Religions, as it was called back then, but itís much higher than that. Itís high Freemasonry today, but itís been on the go for centuries, this same organization, very wealthy people behind it. And of course there is nothing better than getting the public to go along with something than telling them that this is foreordained, this is predicted, therefore it will be so. They become self-fulfilling prophecies because everyone works towards it. We find that the Germans used it for propaganda to justify their takeover of Europe with predictions, and Britain also had its team working there to counter the predictions of Hitler. So Nostradamus can get pulled out the bag at any time to justify anything. And really, out of the centuries, as it was called, all these different predictions, itís so vaguely worded you can make up whatever you want, and people certainly do. [Alan laughing.]
Justin: Yes. I had some other questions about free health care for Native Canadians; I myself fall under that category. I have been listening to your stuff about inoculations and stuff and I myself have had ear troubles as a child, I still do. And I heard you mention intuition as well, with other people, and I sort of felt this sort of intuition, this sort of distrust of a lot of stuff growing up as a Native Canadian. Just seeing, you know, certain things on a smaller scale, in sort of like a schoolyard setting, or certain settings, and just feeling this sort of intuition or distrust of certain things, feeling there is something bigger going on here.
Alan: Oh, there is something bigger going on. Weíre getting trained to know exactly what weíre supposed to know. And whether itís true or false doesnít matter; weíre supposed to know this. Your inoculations, you understand too, especially Indians on reservations in Canada because they get grants and so on, and theyíre kept in these reservations, by law they have to accept the medical authorities. They have to accept them. They have field-testing there on all these different inoculations. Now, whatís interesting to me is that childhood diseases, the runny noses, the otitis media, all the ear problems and so on, they tell you is natural in medical school. But before they came out with all these infant inoculations it didnít happen. They didnít have these. In other words, these things that weíre getting as childhood problems were actually caused by the vaccines. And I personally know people who have daughters, their daughters have had children and they convinced them, different ones convinced them, for the next child NOT to have inoculations. The ones who had no inoculations had no childhood diseases, no sore ears, no runny noses, no coughs. So obviously, itís caused by the very stuff that theyíre injecting into you. But the Indians unfortunately are supposed to mandatorily take all these inoculations because they take grants.
Justin: Oh yes. Yeah, Iíve been wondering about that. Why do native people get all this free health care and tax breaks and all this stuff like that? And you know, there are treaties that have been broken and all this stuff but it seems like theyíre still sort of getting a little bit of an edge on other people. I just wondered, why is that? Why these people? You know what I mean? There must be something going on there.
Alan: This is the fascinating thing, if you go into the history of eugenics and economics, and go into the writings of John Stuart Mill, he has it listed Ė the same as HG Wells had it listed; he worked for the later organization of the same group. They had all the different peoples listed as to superior all the way down to inferior. And they all had it classified, even in the 1700s, that the American Indian, the Irish, and eventually HG Wells added later on the Scots as well, would be people who would have to be eliminated because they couldnít adapt into the new system. No kidding; thatís what they said. So hold on and Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and Cutting Through The Matrix. I donít know if Justin is still there. Are you still there Justin?
Justin: Yes, I am still here, Alan.
Alan: I was going to say that, you understand that the whole policy, the whole belief system or religion of eugenics and Darwinism states that if people cannot adapt, not only do they die, they must dieÖ or they will bring down those who are evolving higher and higher, they will bring them down. Thatís what they truly believe and thatís really official policy, though academia. They still push and promote the same thing; thatís through government as well. Iíve talked to, I knew someone who was up in the government, the Federal Department for Indian Affairs in Canada, and she told me, she criticized that the Indians wouldnít work and so on, etc, etc. In other words, see, the only way you can adapt into this system Ė it is a system Ė is by joining them and mimicking them as Charles Darwin called it too; those who canít mimic the white guy has to perish basically. That means also going into the same kind of business, money borrowing, etc, and producing. Thatís what they call the normal system. So they will not tolerate any other kind of system going alongside themselves. So I think personally itís simply policy of extermination over time; thatís all it is to me.
Justin: Yes. I was also wondering if you believe that the alcoholicsí anonymous program is sort of a form of, another form of control or mind control. Having read some of the literature, in the beginning, the Rothschild name pops up.
Alan: Rothschild pops up. It was also the Oxford school, they called it too.
Justin: Yeah, the Oxford groups.
Alan: Thatís right. And the Oxford group too were part of the British Empire movement, actually they called it the British Israel Movement as well. Britain had the right to rule the world basically, thatís what they believed at the time, the Empire. This strange thing about alcoholics anonymous, itís a data bank for collection of information on peoples as well. Even though some of them will deny that, itís actually collecting data on lots and lots of people, which is similar to Freemasonry who must make a confession to someone. If youíre a Freemason, you go up through the ranks, you must make a confession. So you are blackmailable, you understand. Also, they tell them, itís a disease that you will always have for lifeÖ and all they do at these meetings, apparently, is simply talk about the bar and drinking, as though they were in the bar and still drinking. So in other words, the addiction itself is talking about booze. It doesnít stop. Itís a perpetual addiction of the same thing. I think if somebody wants to stop drinking theyíll have to do it by themselves and just stop.
Justin: Well, some of them do say that, you know, you should talk about the solution as opposed to the problem. But you knowÖ I donít know. I find it kind of strange they use occult symbology as well, and they openly admit that, with the square and the triangles and stuff.
Alan: The Supreme Being and all that stuff; that all came out of Masonry too, because the founders in the Oxford Group were Freemasons, very high Freemason themselves.
Justin: Yeah. It just seems a bit strange to me. Then it sort of seems like the destruction of individuality itself. Itís WE, WE this, WE this, never I.
Alan: You canít be in control of yourself when youíre being taught to always second-guess your own decisions. And thatís what itís teaching you: never be sure of your own decisions. Thatís what theyíre telling you. Itís groupthink. Youíre quite right.
Justin: So do you believe then that there is an agenda there where they say, okay you are not happy and you are destroying yourself as an alcoholic? So when you quit drinking and youíre a productive member of society, youíre a good little slave now, right?
Alan: Youíre good if youíre in a collar and a tie and youíre earning cash. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Eugenics Documentary on Some of its History and Future
Latest Bogus Eugenics Test
Victims of Forced 'Negative' Eugenics Sterilization
Same Old Study finds Same Old Results--Junk and Processed Foods Lowers IQ
"The City" and Heist of the Century
More Corporate Welfare
Localism Bill UK
Cap-Com Tightens Grip of EU for World State Model