Jan. 26, 2011 (#755)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 26, 2011:

Obama Schemes Behind the Scenes,
"We'll Work for Food 'cause Change is Good":

"Compete, Compete, The Leaders Cry,
With Third World Prices, It Makes You Sigh,
Knowing the Absurdity of Such Economics,
With Labour Costs, It's Almost Comic,
So the Moneybags Say Our Only Function
Is to Serve the Economy with Compulsion,
And Compete with Communism, Oh, Nice,
Work for Peanuts and Bowl of Rice,
Masters Say it's Good International Relations,
For We Peasants in Our Global Plantations"
© Alan Watt Jan. 26, 2011

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 26, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 26, 2011.  I always kick off the show by suggesting to newcomers to look into the archives at cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and help yourself to the free audios you will find; there are hundreds to choose from.  I cover a variety of topics, a lot of topics, but really I try and tie in the big picture for you, give you the shortcuts to it because we’re living under incredible psychological and indoctrinational control.  The big sciences have been involved in this our whole lives and your parents before you, and theirs before them for that matter because these sciences are not new at all.  They have been instigated on a massive scale across the world to bring in what’s commonly called the new world order, the globalist society, all of that kind of stuff, to bring out the perfect society for this global agenda.  A lot of heads will be cracked in the process of course, and they know this too.  Even HG Wells talked about it in the early 1900s, actually when they first set up the League of Nations at the end of World War I.  He talked about lots of people fighting this new world order, he says, but it won’t do any good anyway because it will be too overpowering for them.  We’re living through a script.  I try to show you how the script is run.  Help yourself to those audios. 

 

Remember, all those sites you’ll see listed on the .com site – these are the official sites – have the same audios.  They all have a lot of transcripts in English for download and you can find transcripts in other languages if you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu – you’ll see that listed on the .com site as well – and you will find a variety to choose from so help yourselves.  Remember too, that you bring me to you, you are the audience.  I don’t bring on the advertisers as you know and I don’t sell you anything.  The only thing I sell are the books that I’ve got, and I don’t even have time to write more; I wish I could.  You can help me out by buying the books and the disks at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  [Order and donation options listed above.] 

 

As I say, we’re living through a script, and incredible script, and just looking through the media today, the news, and what’s thrown out for us – and it is thrown out.  I had a picture in my mind of someone on a farm just throwing out the seed for the chickens to pick up; that’s really what the media is about really.  When big things are happening they give you lots and lots of trivia and lots of little things which you’re supposed to get riled about and argue about but you forget the next day, as they hand you more chicken feed.  I tend not to fall for that.  I try to see what really is going on behind the silence, really, of the trivia media because the media’s job is not to help you or inform you.  If they were there to do that they’d be telling you about ALL of the hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of organizations that run your lives, that the media never touches upon.  They run your banking.  They run every facet of your life and you don’t even know it.  And they’re all run by the richest people on the planet.  They have all kinds of scientists on board and so on to form the perfect society and to shape our minds as we’re going through the changes, so that we behave correctly.  I'll be back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  We’re back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  Most folk, as I say, are given their standard indoctrination in school to do with the world.  It’s shaped basically to shape your mind and to make sure that you believe correctly what you’re being told.  The initial indoctrination is very important because it will be backed up and reinforced down through your life by the media that takes over and even movies too that will slant a particular country or area of the globe in a particular fashion.  So you are being prepared from childhood for this. 

 

It’s so interesting to see.  They don’t want you to understand the whys of things.  You understand, most folk who listen to this show I’m sure really have got to the stage where they are questioning the whys of things.  It’s never mentioned.  Like, why are we global?  Says who?  And who worked towards globalism?  Who voted for globalism?  Did you?  Any of you get a chance to vote for globalism?  Of course not.  Again, why are these big foundations working on the sides with trillions of dollars, throwing money all over the planet to NGOs?  How come they also have seats on government boards and so on to direct policies, etc?  You see.  When did all this happen?  And who gave them permission to do it?  Because they never asked the citizens of any country to do this; they just did it anyway.  You start to realize, you’ve never really had a country of your own.  That’s the truth of it in fact.  You never did. 

 

In fact, I’d say the last bit of freedom there was, was probably after the American War for Independence for maybe 50 years or so, or 60 years.  That was a bit of freedom where you could go off into the bush and get lost if you wanted to, and there was nobody chasing you for taxes or anything else.  That was the little bit of freedom that you had because shortly in came the usual boys and the lawyers and then the associations and then rules and laws and taxations and everything else came out of it.  They forget so quickly too, in the US, that the first fracas they had after the Revolutionary War was the war against those who were making booze basically.  They would get rather astounded to find out they just fought a war for independence and taxes and so on, to find out that the first tax that they’re going to levy was on these guys themselves making the booze.  Anyway, that’s the way it goes. 

 

We live in a monetary system that was invented thousands and thousands of years ago by people from other countries.  In other words, other parts of the world and of course the Middle East was heavily involved even from the times of the Phoenicians and before them there were other groups and so on doing the same thing.  The traders who were also, what would later be called Merchant Bankers, later on, when they became rather official, they got official status.  They created the City of London as it’s called, the city itself, and moved their banking projects in there.  They ran all the shipping lanes, all the ships, all the trade and they also ran the government.  Nothing has changed really, over there in Britain for instance; it’s the same banks, and of course they brought in their Egyptian obelisks just to let everybody know who they were.  Anyway, they have this M.O. with them of course, an M.O., and they won’t allow any other system to work, you see.  Other parts of the world, because there were different cultures, had to be acted upon differently to bring them into this global system.  Long ago they decided to use communism to bring other big parts of the world together, under a kind of force, they had to be forced into it.  So they had their revolutions and they forced the people through a terror regime into compliance, and they claim that’s the fastest way to get them up to speed with the rest of the world, for this same system to blend together

 

They still play jokes with us today.  It’s so funny reading articles, as I say, the chicken feed they’re throwing out. There’s an article here from the Washington Times...

 

''If China becomes the world's No. 1 nation ... ." That was the headline in the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party . . . 

 

Now, we kind of laugh at it because we can’t understand communism making profits, and holding the US debt too.  We can’t imagine this being communist.  But you still have to belong to the Communist Party if you want to get up into university and in business.  That’s what runs their country; it’s not a democracy as you think of it at all.  It was only a few years ago that they suddenly changed overnight to say, well profit is good, you know; they added that on to Mao Tse Tung’s Little Red Book. 

 

So we’re supposed to swallow all this stuff, believing it’s just some strange thing… strange things happen and we don’t understand.  If it’s not explained to us by the media we tend to forget them.  In reality China was set up to be communist by the same people who already ruled – and I mean ruled – and owned, lock, stock and barrel, the countries of the West.  That’s who set China up, as a communist state, to bring all this in. 

 

You’ll find in writings little hints of the people who were sent over to help introduce the ideas into the Chinese minds, in universities, like Bertrand Russell.  He was sent over to introduce this idea – LORD Bertrand Russell by the way – into the Chinese mentality.  Just like all systems they needed heavy funding and that comes from the usual clique of international bankers.  These bankers don’t open up branch offices.  You have to go to them as a country’s leader to borrow from them.  So just like they set up the Soviet Union, and owned it basically, they set up the Chinese system as well.  Here’s the headline…

 

PRELL: China: U.S. No. 1 no more

China’s ambitions are not modest

By Michael Prell / washingtontimes.com / January 19, 2011

 

“If China becomes the world’s No. 1 nation … .” That was the headline in the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party, The People’s Daily, on the eve of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s state visit to Washington. The article went on to boast how “China‘s emergence is increasingly shifting to debate over how the world will treat China, which is the world No. 1 and has overtaken the U.S.”

 

A story like this does not appear by accident in the official Chinese Communist Party newspaper on the eve of a state visit to the world’s (current) No. 1 power, the United States.

 

It was a signal. The latest and boldest signal yet that China intends to become the world’s No. 1 power.

 

President Obama took the occasion of his first visit to China to show “humility” (Alan:  I wish he’d show some at home.) and to assure his Shanghai audience that “we do not seek to contain China‘s rise.”  (A:  Because that’s the plan you see.  In the books that the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs, that’s run by the big bankers that lend and set up revolutions in countries and wars and stuff, I’ve got books from the 1930s where they had world meetings and they talked THEN about bringing China up to be THE manufacturer for the planet, and that was before they had communism introduced into it.  These guys, it’s a big business plan we’re living through.  No kidding.)

 

The Chinese communists are taking the occasion of their first visit to the Obama White House - not to show humility, as Mr. Obama did to them - but to openly show their clear intention to dominate the world from the Middle Kingdom.  (A:  I should also add too, Arnold Toynbee, who was a professor for Rhodes Scholars who came to Oxford, he also talked about that.  He said eventually when America FADES, and he said American would last as the main nation for maybe 70 years, maybe less, and then China was deemed to take over.  At that time he spoke, in the 30s, China literally was a real third world nation.  So we’re living through a script.)

 

The Chinese communists are taking the occasion of their first visit to the Obama White House - not to show humility, as Mr. Obama did to them - but to openly show their clear intention to dominate the world from the Middle Kingdom.  (A:  That sounds like Lord of the Rings, eh; the middle kingdom.)

 

As Constantine Menges wrote in “China: The Gathering Threat,” “In the traditional Chinese view, the world needs a hegemon - or dominant state - to prevent disorder. (A:  It sounds very cabalistic doesn’t it? …the yin and the yang and all that stuff, and evil and good and the balance, etc.)  The communist Chinese regime believes China should be that hegemon.” Traditionally, the Chinese communists have cloaked their hegemonic ambitions under the guidance of the late Deng Xiaoping to “keep a cool head and maintain a low profile. Never take the lead - but aim to do something big.”

 

But in early 2010, cool heads and low profiles gave way to a senior People’s Liberation Army officer openly calling for “China to abandon modesty about its global goals and sprint to become world No. 1,” adding that “China‘s big goal in the 21st century is to become world No. 1, the top power.”

 

Now we have the official state paper of the Chinese Communist Party openly discussing “China as the world’s top nation” on the eve of China‘s state visit to the Obama White House. Why is this happening? And why now?

 

When Mr. Obama “arrived in China … as a fiscal supplicant, not the leader of the free world,” as stated in the Times Online, and bowed down to their communist premier, the Chinese communists took the president’s gestures as the signs of weakness they were, and quickly made “radical departures from late patriarch Deng Xiaoping‘s famous diplomatic credo of ‘adopting a low profile and never taking the lead’ in international affairs” by unveiling China‘s new “ambitious agenda” to assume a more powerful stance on the world stage and “to become world No. 1, the top power,” according to the Asia Times.

 

So now they’re taking the lead supposedly and we’re supposed to just get this gradually through our heads.  There is no doubt about it, as they go through the privatization of armies, they’ve got other countries to conquer, as you well know in the Middle East, and they’ll eventually have to bring in Chinese troops to police the world.  That is the agenda down the road.  Good luck to them because let them pay the taxes for it then, for a change.  I don’t think it will make much difference to people across the Western world; they’re too dumbed down and too well entertained to take much notice as to whether it’s a Chinese boot or someone else’s boot that comes through their door.  So that’s just the way it is folks. 

 

We’re being played, like crazy, and it IS an agenda, and it’s a script, it’s intergenerational and every generation has been used to bring this world society into being.  Not so that it will be some nice happy global family, but so that the same bigwigs who already conquered your countries a long time ago can run the whole planet, and be the Super Class as they call themselves, and as others have called them too, who will be as remote from you – as Russell said, you know – as a different species would be. That’s how they see themselves already.  Technically they are a different species in a sense.  They can’t imagine how you live.  I’ve had some of them tell me that; they can’t imagine how you, meaning the ordinary folk, live.  They have no idea.  It’s like Bush when he was in office, who at least was honest enough, and it was on tape on YouTube somewhere.  He said, I’ve never met a poor person; he’s never mixed with any, you see.  He’s never grown up with any.  He says, I need to know what the poor are thinking; find me somebody who knows poor people.  I mean, these people are so out of touch with the headaches that you have they can’t relate to you at all.  Not at all.  I feel your pain, says Clinton.  Yeah, you know where it is.  I'll be back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix.  It IS such a farce, isn’t it?  Because here you are, taught for years that communism was basically diametrically opposed to capitalism and profits and all that.  We’re supposed to just go through this floating period as the World Trade Organization and The World Bank and all the rest of them, and all of your governments signed on to it, pushed through the GATT treaty which allowed all of your companies, all of your factories to move to China, and of course the taxpayer would fund it all.  That’s all in the treaty.  And nobody questions it.  Nobody questions it at all.  A few people noticed.  Sir James Goldsmith noticed.  Other folk spoke out and says, this will take all the jobs away.  And they were right of course, against the pooh-poohs of the guys at the top that were saying, oh it will be prosperous for American and Canada and so on.  What a joke that’s been.  It’s prosperous for them of course, if they consider themselves a different form of Canada or America than everyone else does – which actually they do.  But it’s such a joke.

 

I said years ago, the biggest joke will be when the communists basically are lending and own all the debt of the West.  I’ve been proven right now; it’s out here now, that China holds the debt of the United States.  They are buying – the old game, the old ancient game, going back to the Phoenicians and before – of holding the debt.  During the whole Japan era, after World War II, when they built Japan up under, I think it was the Hopkins Plan.  He was set to build a post-war Japan; that’s why they knocked down and destroyed all their old buildings.  That was a renovation plan, by bombing, preparing for all the new ones and factories they’d put up there.  They decided then that Japan was going to be created to be the biggest producer in electronics and other things before World War II was ended, and they set up the whole system to do it.  So they flattened it basically, all their big cities, and then sent in the boys to set up the system.  That became very prosperous, for a while.  The Japanese had some work to go to, and they certainly made things awfully well.  It’s the same kind of idea with China. 

 

Japan used to hold the debt for America.  It would go back and forth like a yo-yo.  When America was soaring Japan would supposedly have less debt and when it was falling Japan would buy the debt.  That’s how they balanced this con game out.  Now it’s China doing the same thing.  The Chinese themselves are an ideal people, a collective-minded people, who are far easier to train than most other people.  They have never really known in their culture this idea of individuality.  You can condition them into a new system very quickly and very well indeed.  It works well with them.  So you have a whole people there who work together, they follow all the propaganda, and swallow it too.  They don’t rebel against their leaders; in fact they can’t even speak out against the leaders.  They are still communist, by the way; if you didn’t know that.  They still are communist, and no one says anything about it. 

 

The United Nations of course, that was set up by the same big bankers, using the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR, they set up the United Nations.  They have said at the United Nations that China is the model state for the world to follow.  See, it’s a perfected socialist, or fascist, state – you understand? – where the peasants do what they’re told.  You can shove them into factories and they work obediently, in awful conditions, for peanuts.  They’re awfully obedient to the masters, you see.  Terribly obedient, that’s the perfected state.  Of course they abort every second child, if you have a second child, UNLESS you can afford the fees; that’s the eugenics part of it.  If you can afford the fees it means you’re wealthier, obviously; you can afford them.  You can have a second and third child if you’re middle class.  So it’s eugenics in action; it’s the perfected society, as far as Rockefeller and the big boys that love this system have said. 

 

China Bank Moves to Buy U.S. Branches

ICBC Signs a Deal for Bank of East Asia's Retail Outlets.

wsj.com / JANUARY 22, 2011 / By LINGLING WEI

I’ll put this link up for you as well.  Then you have…

 

China to create largest mega city in the world with 42 million people

China is planning to create the world's biggest mega city by merging nine cities to create a metropolis twice the size of Wales with a population of 42 million.

telegraph.co.uk /  By Malcolm Moore in Shanghai and Peter Foster in Beijing / 24 Jan 2011

 

Everybody has seen this article I’m sure, of Mega City.  You have to read it again.  It’s going to create a whole bunch of cities, join them up, with 42 million people inside.  This is the perfected Agenda 21 for those who don’t know what that is, or Millennium Goals is another term they use for it too, for sustainability, where they cram everyone off the land into the cities, again the great work force for their factories, very cheap labor; they’ve got their nice slum area of course.  It’s going to be astonishingly big, this one of course.  They want eventually everyone in the world to live in these mega cities.  Mega Cities was first mentioned in the 90s by the United Nations that said, we must create Mega Cities across the planet, get the folk off the land, into those Mega Cities so that we can be sustainable, it says.  Anyway…

 

City planners in south China have laid out an ambitious plan to merge together the nine cities that lie around the Pearl River Delta.

 

The "Turn The Pearl River Delta Into One" scheme will create a 16,000 sq mile urban area that is 26 times larger geographically than Greater London, or twice the size of Wales.

 

The new mega-city will cover a large part of China's manufacturing heartland, (A:  That’s because they want the cheap labor all concentrated.) stretching from Guangzhou to Shenzhen and including Foshan, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Zhuhai, (A:  …and all the rest of these -hu’s and -han’s and -wang’s, etc.)  Jiangmen, Huizhou and Zhaoqing. Together, they account for nearly a tenth of the Chinese economy.

 

Over the next six years, around 150 major infrastructure projects will mesh the transport, energy, water and telecommunications networks of the nine cities together, at a cost of some 2 trillion yuan (£190 billion).  An express rail line will also connect the hub with nearby Hong Kong. (A:  Can you imagine getting stuck in a concrete jungle that big?  It will be good for anti-depressants though, wouldn’t it?  I'll be back with more after this break.)

 

Hi folks.  This is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about some articles from China.  I’ll put these links up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.  It says in this article too, that they’re going to basically move a lot more folk into these areas.

 

By the end of the decade, China plans to move ever greater numbers into its cities, creating some city zones with 50 million to 100 million people and "small" city clusters of 10 million to 25 million.

 

What they’re doing is supposedly to try to get them into the urban areas.  Well, that’s Agenda 21 for those who don’t know, and they want to do the same thing across Canada, the States, and elsewhere across Europe.  That’s also being implemented now, for those who live in la-la land.  They actually are implementing it through higher taxation and so on to drive you off the land.  They’re also saying it’s hard to keep up the infrastructure.  If you happened to get fed your water supply, gas supply, whatever it is you use, from them, they will find various means to get you off, until, as the UN said itself, eventually only 3% will live on the land and these will be very wealthy people.  We know who they’ll be. They’ll be the ones who rule you.  That’s where it’s all supposed to go.  So you’re living through a script. 

 

As I say, China never built itself up.  It was the World Trade Organization and the GATT treaty that set them up, and The World Bank and the IMF and all of your own politicians.  Well, they’re not yours.  You know that.  I think you’re wise enough to realize that none of your politicians are yours, in any country.  It’s one big club, you see.  Politics is a front basically for the guys who really rule the world. 

 

Remember too, even the bankers had meetings in the early 1900s.  These bankers were the richest people.  They’re not guys who have little exchanges on the street corner there where you walk in and open a savings account.  These are private bankers who lend to nations.  They had meetings to do with the world and democracy and they said, democracy can’t work; it would interfere with business and all the rest of it, and theoretically they, being the natural economists of the time, should rule the world.  They were in a far better position they claimed to do so.  Well, that really did happen.  That’s how it’s always been since then, under this fake guise of democracy and freedoms and all the rest of it. 

 

You know, I saw the little clip of the video of when they had the G20 in Toronto.  You’ll see this little fella being challenged by police that wanted to search him.  That’s what they did in Toronto during that time.  They searched you and searched your bags and your haversacks and so on.  The cop actually tells him when he asks the question, I’m a citizen, blah, blah, blah.  He says, well there is no Canada – there ain’t no Canada at the moment.  He says, this isn’t Canada, around the perimeter fence, you know. 

 

G20 officer: ‘This ain’t Canada right now’

Nicole Baute / Toronto Star / sovereignindependent.com

 

Just outside the St. Andrew subway station, a male York Regional Police officer wraps one arm around the protester and tells him: “You don’t get a choice, get moving.”

 

“Why are you grabbing me, man?” says the unidentified protester, who in another G20 video gives a brief monologue about animal rights. “I didn’t do anything.”

 

The male protester insists that, as a Canadian, he has the right to refuse the search. But the officer disagrees.

 

“This ain’t Canada right now,” he says.

 

Do you understand the DANGERS of what we’re hearing and seeing?  I wonder how many people actually understand what we see and hear in this day and age.  When you see these towering guys above little fellas, bossing them around, pushing them around, dressed like combat troops because they love the movies, these guys.   They know that the big masters give them the authority to do whatever they want to do.  They all know that too now.  They’re itching to just bash at the people.  They actually have the audacity to say that this part around here isn’t Canada anymore.  I mean, what was it then?  You know?  What was it if it wasn’t Canada?  Who’s making these rules and decisions?  What legalities are in use here?  What’s going on?  You know.  Does that mean you’re a nonperson or you’re an alien in your own country, because they suddenly decided to put a perimeter around something and you happen to be walking by the outside of it?

 

I’ll put that link up tonight too just for those who really are not quite…  And again too, people put it down to isolated incidents.  No.  No.  Don’t do that.  You’ve got to understand the whole world in general, and this is happening all over the world right now, as you are taught that you are now under a new system.  It’s authoritarian.  They’re not pretending about democracy anymore… unless it suits them.  Oh, we’re going to invade this country or that country to bring them democracy.  Revolutionary democracy was what Bush says, forcing it upon them.  And yet they never get it because we never had it either. 

 

Now, Egypt is interesting because, suddenly we find out there are riots in Egypt, that’s been about fairly stable for about 30 years or so.  It says here…

 

Egypt Protests: Thousands Fill Streets To Protest Mubarak

(A:  …who is the guy in charge.)

huffingtonpost.com / January 26, 2011

 

 CAIRO (AP) -- Thousands of anti-government protesters, some hurling rocks and climbing atop an armored police truck, clashed with riot police Tuesday in the center of Cairo in a Tunisia-inspired demonstration to demand the end of Hosni Mubarak's nearly 30 years in power. (A:  It doesn’t tell you much more about that.  It talks a bit about poverty and so on. But this is obviously orchestrated.  It reminds me of what they did in Iran actually, with the big NGOs that were put over there actually and well funded.  Brzezinski mentioned them, that they had NGOs in there whipping up trouble, for demonstrations, hoping they could overthrow the country from within.   I read the articles at the time; I put the links up too where you hear Brzezinski talking about it and saying he had a hand in it.  Well, this smacks of the same thing.)

 

Police responded with blasts from water cannons and set upon crowds with batons and acrid clouds of tear gas to clear demonstrators crying out "Down with Mubarak" and demanding an end to Egypt's grinding poverty, corruption, unemployment and police abuses.

 

Tuesday's demonstration, the largest Egypt has seen for years, began peacefully, with police showing unusual restraint in what appeared to be a calculated strategy by the government to avoid further sullying the image of a security apparatus widely seen as little more than corrupt thugs in uniforms.  (A:  Well, where is it different?)

 

With discontent growing over economic woes, and the toppling of Tunisia's president still resonating in the region, Egypt's government - which normally responds with swift retribution to any dissent - needed to tread carefully. 

 

Now, there is obviously more to this than meets the eye… because it’s been too quiet.  We were getting kind of bored with Iraq and we’re kind of bored with Afghanistan. They’re still slaughtering folk and big business is going over there and grabbing chucks of this and that and natural resources. But you know this is going further.  What’s going on here?  This is the next part that’s to go because you see, there are plans for the entire region, from Egypt to the Euphrates.  Some of them will know what it is but most folk won’t.  There are plans for that whole region there.  It’s so amazing too, to watch the goings on as people are stirred up to protest and so on.  Do you understand, it takes an awful lot – and this is a truism – for people to actually rebel?  Their backs generally are against the wall.  So when this kind of thing happens it’s been orchestrated, funded, and there are professional agitators obviously been sent out there; not that I’m standing up for the regime as it stands, but there is something else going on here. 

 

I’ll put up another link because the country that is mainly concerned about it of course is, guess who?  It’s Israel, you see.  [“Warily Eyeing Egypt, Israelis Feel Like Spectators”, New York Times.]  Israel apparently is more concerned than any of the rest of them about what happens in Egypt.  There is more to this story than meets the eye.  More to it than is going on and someone’s made big plans.  I’ve no doubt it will go a lot further.  We’ll see what really is at the end of it, hopefully. 

 

I like this article here because it reminds me of what I talked about last year when I talked about the video – if you can get a hold of it watch it; it keeps getting pulled off the net.  It was called StarsuckersStarsuckers showed you how gullible the public are to do with celebrities, how a few people could actually put up a stall in a shopping mall and get the women to hand over their children to do a pretense cutting off of chickens heads, supposedly as a kind of promo to see if they could get on to television.  And everybody wants their children to be stars, you see.  The second part of it was incredibly good because it showed you how celebrities are used for everything and how the gullible public – unfortunately it’s true – follow the stars. They put these front men in as heads of big charities who end up ripping everybody off of course.  Charities are notorious for ripping off.  They go along with the foundations.  Their money isn’t checked.  The incredible billions that pour in isn’t checked.  No one asks where it’s going or anything else.  It goes into pockets.  At least Starsuckers, if you watch the second part of it, did go into the Live Aid concerts and so on, and where the money went, or at least where the billions didn’t go, put it that way.  This article is on…

 

Fraud Plagues Celebrity-Backed Global Health Fund

January 26, 2011 / JOHN HEILPRIN  / The Huffington Post

 

GENEVA — A $21.7 billion development fund backed by celebrities and hailed as an alternative to the bureaucracy of the United Nations sees as much as two-thirds of some grants eaten up by corruption (A:  Well, it’s more than two-thirds.), The Associated Press has learned.

 

Much of the money is accounted for with forged documents or improper bookkeeping, indicating it was pocketed, investigators for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria say. Donated prescription drugs wind up being sold on the black market.

The fund's newly reinforced inspector general's office, which uncovered the corruption, can't give an overall accounting because it has examined only a tiny fraction of the $10 billion that the fund has spent since its creation in 2002. But the levels of corruption in the grants they have audited so far are astonishing.  (A:  And this is just one fund, right.)

 

A full 67 percent of money spent on an anti-AIDS program in Mauritania was misspent, the investigators told the fund's board of directors. So did 36 percent of the money spent on a program in Mali to fight tuberculosis and malaria, and 30 percent of grants to Djibouti.

 

In Zambia, where $3.5 million in spending was undocumented and one accountant pilfered $104,130, the fund decided the nation's health ministry simply couldn't manage the grants and put the United Nations in charge of them. (A:  Well, it’s safe there, right?  [Alan laughing.])  The fund is trying to recover $7 million in "unsupported and ineligible costs" from the ministry.

 

The fund is pulling or suspending grants from nations where corruption is found, and demanding recipients return millions of dollars of misspent money.  (A:  Good luck to them because it’s all gone.)

 

"The messenger is being shot to some extent," fund spokesman Jon Liden said. "We would contend that we do not have any corruption problems that are significantly different in scale or nature to any other international financing institution."  (A:  So three-quarters of corruption is pretty well close to every other international financing institution, it says.)

 

To date, the United States, the European Union and other major donors have pledged $21.7 billion to the fund, the dominant financier of efforts to fight the three diseases.  (A:  They don’t plan to fight these diseases.)  The fund has been a darling of the power set that will hold the World Economic Forum in the Swiss mountain village of Davos this week.  (A:  Which actually they had, I believe.  It’s interesting, the World Economic Forum, again, is the same bankers, international boys, and it’s WEF, which backwards if FEW, it’s for the FEW, you see.  You can’t get in; it’s just for the few.  So this goes on about all the incredible corruption which goes on. As I say, you’ve got to watch Starsuckers if you can get a hold of that.  It’s VERY, very well done.)

 

It was on the sidelines of Davos that rock star Bono launched a new global brand, (Product) Red, which donates a large share of profits to the Global Fund. Other prominent backers include former U.N. secretary-general Kofi Annan, French first lady Carla Bruni-Sarkozy and Microsoft founder Bill Gates, whose Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gives $150 million a year.  (A:  You should see what Bill’s taken in on charity; it’s incredible.  These guys don’t lose anything; everything they give out is a massive investment, believe you me. That’s the real world that we live in though. That’s the real world.  It’s just something else.)

 

The Chemical Cosh is an interesting story.  A cosh is something you hit someone over the head with, like a baton.  The chemical cosh is the drug industry, the LEGAL drug industry, probably run by the same guys that run and make the illegal drug industry.  It says here…

 

Teachers blamed for record number of children being prescribed 'chemical cosh'

By Kate Loveys / dailymail.co.uk / 21st January 2011

 

The vast majority of the children on 'chemical cosh' were given the potent drug on the instruction of their teacher.

 

There are now some 650,000 eight to 13-year-olds on the drug or its equivalents.  (A:  That’s like Ritalin, etc.)

 

This marks an astonishing rise, up from 92,700 in 1997 and just 9,000 in 1990, according to NHS figures.  (A:  National Health Service.)

 

Yesterday it emerged the vast majority of the children were given the potent drug on the instruction of their teacher.  

 

(A:  They’re all brainwashed, these teachers, and they’re the new type too.  The new type.  They want obedience in the classroom.  They want zombies actually.  It’s mainly young guys who get put on these drugs.  And young guys are awfully, awfully restless.  I should know that; I went to school.  At lot of this stuff is terribly boring and it was also indoctrination too, there is no doubt about that.  Lots of it was lies too because I used to go to the adult library and check everything out myself.  Anyway, you get fidgety in school when you’re like that.  Guys don’t quieten down until years and years later.  But the answer, of course, for a quiet classroom according to the feminist lobby, is docile boys who are all drugged on Ritalin.  That is part of this whole problem too, is the feminist lobby in the teaching industry because it’s a matriarchal society now.)

 

Critics say staff are too quick to dish out drugs if their pupils get restless – in an effort to keep control of the classroom. And experts warned of the damage inflicted on ‘developing minds’.  (A:  Well no kidding, it shrinks the brain.) 

 

Amphetamine-like Ritalin is prescribed to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. . .

 

It’s amazing too; if you’re caught with amphetamines you’re in the slammer, but it’s okay for teachers to dish them out to children.  Do you understand, something is vastly wrong in this world today?  Do you really understand that it’s not just mistakes?  It’s not just bumbling bureaucrats and so on.  There is something vastly wrong and there is something else going on obviously.  Do you know that?  Do you understand that?  I hope you do.  This is the kind of thing, as I say, that’s going on.   They want compliance, obedience, etc.  What they want really is a society like China.  That’s what they really want and they’ll use the drugs to do it.

 

Now, interestingly, between ages, if you study philosophy, and it’s still taught today in philosophy classes in various universities, that at the end of an age, of an Empire say, certain things manifest as the system goes down the tubes.  One is the perversion in sexuality affairs; that comes to the surface.  That happened in ancient Rome.  In fact, at one time the Emperor of Rome had to make a law to try and force the elite and the nobility and the middle class to breed because they were stopping breeding; guys were going off with guys for their parties in the bathhouses, the women were going off with women and stuff like that.  They wanted offspring to keep the empire going.  So there are different traits, etc, plus there were lots of new Gods that came in, in what we call today the new agey stuff.  That also comes to the surface during times of something collapsing because everyone senses the changes.  They sense that their values are altering.  They sense that something is dying in their system and they look to all kinds of escapes to try and make them feel comfortable about a world to come or something like that.  We have all of that happening now, but you also have erratic behavior by those in authority.  I’ll talk about that when I come back from this break.

 

Hi folks.  We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how other parts of the structure go off in odd tangents too.  We find lots of psychological experiments going off in schools.  I’ve read some over the years.  There is one where…

 

Teachers told terrified primary school children (A:  That’s from 5-12.)

World War Three had broken out then led them to cellar and (A:  …outside they…) set off fireworks and a siren (A:  …to make it all very real to them.)

By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 21st January 2011

 

Of course they’ve all had nightmares and everything ever since.  These are supposedly adults doing this to children.  It’s incredible what’s going on.  And of course there are no repercussions to this.  They seem to have some kind of modern immunity, which they probably have because there will be some psychologist involved from the big universities studying the effects, etc, to do with control, because everything is to do about controlling the minds of the general public and they love to start with children. 

 

We’ll go to Maggie from Texas on the phone.  Are you there Maggie? 

 

Maggie:  Hi, yeah, this is Maggie from Texas. 

 

Alan:  How are you doing?

 

Maggie:  You cover so much it’s hard to stick to any one thing.  You mentioned Bill Gates and I can remember the days when people used to criticize Bill Gates on the grounds that he never contributed to anything except his own children’s schools in Seattle, or the Seattle area.  Then that suddenly changed overnight.  I have the idea that he’s a front for his father who no doubt plans to live forever.  I have heard him speak several times and he doesn’t impress me as all that bright.  What is your comment on that?

 

Alan:  I think you’re dead on with that.  He was no genius, this guy.  He was a front man for a system, again, that definitely was pushed through to bring out the Microsoft systems for the world.  They wanted one system to dominate the whole world and they made him the front man for it too.  I’ve no doubt whatsoever about that; this is how they do things in reality, when you study history.  As you say, he suddenly becomes a philanthropist; he’s suddenly concerned.  But his main concern on where the money goes is into depopulation programs across the world.  That’s all part of this big global philanthropic club, is depopulation, mainly of the third world to start with but they want it back home as well.  He has spoken out. He belongs to the club Rockefeller, Oprah Winfrey belongs to, the ‘lucky gene club’ they call themselves, meaning good eugenicists of course.   They have talked about radical depopulation is necessary to save the world and so on.  So what kind of philanthropist is this?  He also said that inoculating children across the world will help reduce the population.  What does he mean by that?  You know. 

 

Maggie:  I remember when he was still young and he was talking about getting married, there was a very big publicity, a big deal, about how he was looking for a woman with exactly the right genes and so on.  He found Melinda.  I noticed that Melinda used to go to the Bilderberg meetings instead of him and I wondered if that was because he was so socially inept that she would do a better job. 

 

Alan:  Well, she actually might have particular genes that are more appropriate for the Bilderberger.  These people really are eugenicists and they do keep records of their family histories going way back.  They really believe in it.  Charles Darwin was the same; they intermarried just with the one family for generations.  They call them dollies, the women with the right genes. They call them dollies; they are the carrier of the right genes.  So you’re quite right.  They’re all eugenicists and they want to depopulate all the inferior types on the planet by giving them injections to depopulate the world.  Thanks for calling. 

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

China--US No. 1 No More

China Buying into US Banking Game

The UN, Agenda 21, Millennium Project, Megacities and China

"This Ain't Canada Right Now" Cop Tells Citizens at G20 Meeting

Israel Watches Egypt

More on Egypt

Big Charities & Corruption

Teachers Promote "Chemical Cosh"--Drugs for Children

Teachers told Students World War Three had Broken Out