Jan. 25, 2011 (#754)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 25, 2011:
Good Citizen Steered by Use of Fear:
"A Good Citizen is Formed with Aid of Science,
Studied Under Microscope, So, With Reliance
His Overlords can Predict All His Behaviour,
He'll Never Make Decisions, Looks for a Saviour
Who'll Guide Him Through this Fearful Life,
Where Governmental Decrees Cause Him Strife,
Always Fearful Down to His Very Soul,
Unconscious that Fear Keeps Him Under Control,
Fear of Unemployment, He Strives at Work
To Always Be Good, No Task He'll Shirk,
Fear of Living and Fear of Dying,
Fear of Unknown Keeps Him Trying,
Insured Against Fire, Sickness and Pain,
Yet Helpless When Economy Goes Down Drain,
Raising to Boiling Point All Those Fears,
A Good Predictable Citizen, All His Years"
© Alan Watt Jan. 25, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 25, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 25, 2011. I always start off the show by talking to the newcomers and there are new people who come in all the time. Itís amazing how many years you can be on and eventually it filters all around the place, and a lot of folk havenít heard you, but they come in all the time so I suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and help yourself to the hundreds of audios that you can download for free. I try and give you the big picture of the system in which you live and which is vastly different from the one that you have imagined or the one that you have been indoctrinated to believe exists, or the one that you even think exists when you start to wake up. Itís beyond all of that even. I give you lots of clues and I show you how this system IS truly a system, an orchestrated system, which plans the world in advance. There is lots of proof of it. Proof is everywhere in fact; they have their own sites up at the big foundations, etc and the associations, and all that kind of stuff. At the top they donít have gangs; they donít call themselves gangs. They have foundations and associations and clubs and things like that. Thatís how the world is really, really run, by the big boys with the big money, and why should they give it up? They have their plans for a future where their offspring can go off into the sunset forever and ever, and new days and new sunsets all the time. Thatís what this is about. In fact a lot of this stuff is even taught in university now, especially in the philosophy classes and under the guise of ethics and bioethics and so on, how to control a world population, how to use the population for economic purposes, and then also how to literally bring it down and then who is responsible. They even debate who is responsible if they had a potential culling of the public; all major universities have these courses. Quite something, but the media doesnít mention it.
So help yourself and remember too, you are the audience that brings me to you, so you can get these free audios. You can buy the books and disks and so on that I sell on the site; that makes me just about tick over and cling on with my fingertips to this system here and what Iím doing on this show. Itís a hard slog, believe you me, and itís not something I would wish on anybody. As I say, itís not even a vocation; itís beyond all that. Itís something that has to be done because Iím just so fed up of being conned, and watching the world being conned, over and over, that something has to be done. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember too, donations would be appreciated, believe you me; itís the same few folk since I started who tend to send in the pennies once in a while and most folk, today, really expect everything for free. And if you do, believe you me, you will be supplied with lots and lots of free stuff by the very people that you think you want to change because the boys at the top donít miss a thing. Before they even gave you the net they talked about information warfare. It was all over the newspapers before most folk even knew what a computer was, except massive machines with tapes in them. They already talked about information warfares and how theyíd control it. How do you control it? You make sure that you have the biggest sites out there once you come out. They always give us our top leaders; thatís whatís always been done. For every group that you want to belong to, there is always a leader supplied for you. Thatís how you donít lose control when you run the big world system. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and Cutting Through The Matrix, because it IS a matrix that we live in, indeed there is so much. Itís a tremendous science set up, long before you were born. You understand, that governmental control of populations is ancientÖ ancient; the Egyptians did it and before the Egyptians no doubt many, many other civilizations did it too. Theyíre always digging up older civilizations, and there is always a hierarchy who live off the rest of the public. Nothing has really changed except today the techniques are incredible; they are sciences which are explained and taught to the right people. They have no problem in altering our opinions about things, even giving us our opinions about things; thatís very common. And the media is an essential arm of government really and governmental control, so they can make us believe anything they want to. The same media never go into the big organizations above government; the organizations like the foundations, like all the non-governmental organizations, how much money they get, the training they get, what theyíre told to push for next after they won the last lot for whatever it is theyíre pushing for. They never, ever touch on this parallel government that professor Carroll Quigley did touch upon in his own books Tragedy and Hope and then the other one which is a must-read, The Anglo-American Establishment. Thatís how the world is really run. And the big bankers who set up the foundations to begin with also really run the non-governmental organizations.
NGOs are quite simple to run because most folk want to join a group. Whatever your particular thing is you will join your particular group, and the big boys supply the leaders. Only the leaders know where itís supposed to go; the followers are given PR stuff to follow. It tickles their emotions; they think theyíre fighting for something wonderful and all that, but in reality only the leaders know where itís supposed to go. Itís the same techniques of course that was used in communism. In communism too, the top cells knew the whole, the real agenda that they were to be involved with, while the masses were not to be even told. Their followers of the masses were not to be even told what was going on. Rosa Luxemburg talked about that too. She tried the revolution in Germany.
Itís amazing that the techniques never change, but then again, you know in ancient times, in Greece they said the same things, Plato said it. If something worked before in history on the public and with the public, if you reintroduce it with the same formula, the same sequence of events, the public will do the same or behave the same way again. So again, itís behaviorism they call it today in psychology and of course itís a perfected science. We are given our reality. Most of the time weíre entertained to keep us away from any reality and even the entertainment is embedded with the upcoming, new realities that are just going to be pumped into you down the road. Itís called predictive programming, so youíve got to be very careful what you allow into your mind and into your brain because you are under attack whether you know it or not.
The media again, this wonderful, you know, free media thatís not biased of course, is so quick to label anybody who even does their job, the job that the media doesnít do, which is inquiry into things. This article is about just one of these events.
UN human rights official claims 9/11 was US plot
A UN human rights official has been roundly condemned for suggesting that the US government may have orchestrated the September 11 terrorist attacks.
telegraph.co.uk / 25 Jan 2011 / By Jon Swaine, New York
(Alan: Now, when you read the article here I donít think he actually said that at all. He just says that there are a lot of questions that were not answered and so on. It saysÖ)
Richard Falk, a retired professor from Princeton University, wrote on his blog that there had been an "apparent cover up" by American authorities.
He added that most media were "unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events" on 9/11, despite it containing "gaps and contradictions".
And he described David Ray Griffin, (A: I like how they put it; see, hereís how they do it tooÖ) a conspiracy theorist (A: Thatís like saying youíre a Nazi, anti-Semite or something. Itís a LABEL. Itís a label right awayÖ like thatís your hobby or something.) highly regarded in the (A: Here you are againÖ) so-called "9/11 truth" movement, as a "scholar of high integrity" whose book on the subject was "authoritative". (A: Öin quotation marksÖ)
Ban Ki-Moon, the UN Secretary-General, described the comments as "preposterous" and "an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack." (A: The usual stuff. Hereís the president, the Secretary-General of the UN, the guy who told us that glaciers were melting and weíd all be under water shortly; that was years ago. And yet here they are attacking someone elseís opinion.) But Mr Ban said that it was not for him to decide whether Prof Falk, who serves the organisation as a special investigator into human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories, should be fired by the UN. (A: It goes on and on and on.)
The row came as the new Republican-led US Congress opened an inquiry into "urgent problems" with America's contribution to the United Nations (A: Thatís how it all started up and then of course out came all of this stuff about conspiracy and so on and what really happened on 9/11.)
But theyíre not going to touch the official version; itís chiseled in stone. Like all history always is by the victor, the ruling ones, and nothing will change. Thatís what children will be taught down the road, not that theyíll care much. Thatís how your mind is played with every day, by the way they word things. They can vilify someone so easily without being terribly nasty about it, very blatant, but itís psychology again. The media is not your friend; it never has been your friend.
Newt Gingrich of course, who is always busy doing things behind the scenes, who also was the chairman to kick off the first International Science talks at a university in Louisiana [Loyola], to do with the brain chip basically, who is all for this. Heís all for transhumanism, etc. Heís all for the greening revolution and all the rest of it. Heís back in the news again.
State bankruptcy bill imminent, Gingrich says
Fri, Jan 21 2011 / reuters.com / By Lisa Lambert
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Legislation that would allow U.S. states to file for bankruptcy will likely be introduced in Congress within the next month, Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House of Representatives and a powerful Republican party figure, told Reuters on Friday.
Although Gingrich, considered responsible for the "Republican Revolution" of the 1990's, is no longer in office, he has deep ties to Congress (A: Of course they are because theyíre never really out of it.) and is frequently named as a potential presidential contender in 2012. (A: Hmm.)
For months he has championed letting states file for bankruptcy in order to handle their long-term budget problems despite resistance from states and investors in the $2.8 trillion municipal bond market.
"We're faced with the danger that the states are going to try to show up and say to Washington: You have to give us money," Gingrich said. "And I think we have to have an alternative that allows us to say no."
Iíll put this link up too and you can go through all the rest of the pabulum because thatís all it is really, is more pabulum. It actually mentions in here that the States are really sovereign and I thought, well Iíve never seen anything like that, since Iíve been watching the States my whole life, especially to do with the anti-terrorism bills and all the rest of it. Itís just a federal walkover as far as I could see. But it actually mentions here that itís almost impossible for a State to go bankrupt because itís written into them, somewhere, in some charter, goodness knows where, that they canít really be held responsible, etc. I just donít understand it. Anyway, this is the bill so they can actually go ahead, if they want to, and declare theyíre bankrupt. Maybe they can sell themselves off to China like the nationís already done with everybody anyway so what does it matter.
This article here is to do with JP Morgan. An interesting group, this JP Morgan group, and again the foundations that they have and all the rest of it. Iím going to put this link up too. It saysÖ
Food Stamps as a JPMorgan Growth Industry
By Economic Collapse Blog / economicpolicyjournal.com / January 22, 2011
(A: Itís only one thing that theyíre into. Anywhere where thereís misery and suffering, the bankers are in there, to help you understand, to make sure that you use their organizations, to create more compound interest. It saysÖ)
There are just some things that are a little too "creepy" to be "outsourced" to private corporations. The JP Morgan executive in the interview below does his best to put a positive spin on all this, but it just seems really unsavory for a big Wall Street bank to be making so much money off of the suffering of tens of millions of Americans.... (A: When has it ever been unsavory for banks to make money off the sufferings of tens of millions of Americans? Iíve never seen that anywhere. They have no problem kicking them out of their houses and all the rest of it.)
So if unemployment goes down will this ruin JP Morgan's food stamp business? (A: And so on. But theyíre all into other things too. I donít know if you know that theyíre into a whole bunch of things.)
It turns out that JP Morgan also provides child support debit cards in 15 U.S. states and they also provide unemployment insurance benefit debit cards in seven states.
There is great money in misery, folks. There is tremendous money in misery, especially when youíve got the right contacts in government to make sure you get the contracts for what you want. You can give a bribe without it being so blatantly a bribe; youíre genteel in the way that you speak and the way that you put it across, and you belong to the right clubs of course. Thatís just the way it really is in the real world.
Iím not surprised at all actually with the greenies. What you must do when you want big change, the big boys that run the foundations create a movement, a non-governmental organization, and then they fund them heavily, and they train, they train the head; in fact they put the heads in to lead these NGOs. All the followers come in, all the ones that really believe in the little furry animals and stuff like that, and other ones come in too who are really just fanatics and they want something to bash, you know, the big demonstrations, because they really hate humanity. Thatís a fact; there are lots out there who just hate humanity. It seems now theyíre really praising Genghis Khan Ė no kidding Ė for those who can remember who Genghis Khan is. I think they made him their patron saint because he killed so many folk it says here. Itís the major mainstream media again. He killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted. No kidding you. This is the lengths theyíre going to, to try and validate their nonsense. Iíll read this when I get back from this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back, Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, this article on Genghis Khan and the greenies is astonishing. I really had to do a double take and see if it was April Foolsí Day because thatís the sort of thing you expect when you see this. Then again, there are fanatics out there, lots of fanatics. Iíve read all the articles, even from the main sites themselves of the foundations and the NGOs all into this stuff. Theyíve been quite blatant about the fact that they have to terrify the public and lie to them and so on to get what they want. What they want really is a vastly reduced population, etc. And as I say, theyíve made Genghis Khan their patron saint. It says hereÖ
Genghis Khan the GREEN:
Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted
By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 25th January 2011
(A: The levels plummeted, no kidding eh. They just know this because theyíve got a time machine.)
New legacy: Genghis Khan's bloody conquests scrubbed 700million tons of carbon (A: An exact figure, right.) from the atmosphere as depopulated land returned to forest
Genghis Khan has been branded the greenest invader in history - after his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest.
The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claims a new study.
The deaths of 40million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. (A: Except for Canadian trees, Iíll add to that, because the UN said that Canadaís got BAD trees. We thought weíd get one of these discounts with the carbon sinks and all that. But no, weíve got bad trees now. When they want cash, suddenly itís bad trees.)
And, although his methods may be difficult for environmentalists to accept (A: I donít think so.), ecologists believe it may be the first ever case of successful manmade global cooling.
So there you go. Genghis Khan was a greenie. I understood too, he got his slaves to build, you know, the little huts and that, and the mud-wattle stuff for the peasants and covered it with moss and green stuff like that. While he of course had a big castles and palaces, because you see when you live at that level and youíre dealing with important people youíve got to have big places to entertain them. Of course, these greenies all donít see themselves as the ordinary people who are going to get slaughtered; they always see themselves, somehow, as the managerial class and it never quite gets to their brain somehow that if there are no people around anymore down below them, well who are they managing? And who would need them as a managerial class? They donít think too far.
Iíve mentioned before about Canada and British Empire, which still exists actually; actually the whole world is a British Empire now since the whole plan for globalism was born in London and worked from London and still is. Anyway, if you live in these places your only right when it comes to being attacked by someone who wants to kill you, is to dutifully do nothing and die peacefully. Thatís really what itís all about in Canada. If you defend yourself in any way you really are risking to spend the rest of your life in prison.
Man faces jail after protecting home from masked attackers
nationalpost.com / Tamsin McMahon / January 20, 2011
Ian Thomson moved to a rural homestead in Southwestern Ontario to lead a quiet life investing in a little fixer-upper. (A: That means youíre at the bottom level.) Then his neighbourís chickens began showing up on his property. He warned his neighbour, then killed one of the birds.
The incident began six years of trouble for Mr. Thomson that culminated early one Sunday morning last August when the 53-year-old former mobile-crane operator woke up to the sound of three masked men firebombing his Port Colborne, Ont., home. (A: They were using Molotov cocktails, which is gasoline in bottles with lit ends on the end of it.)
ďI was horrified,Ē he said. ďI couldnít believe it. I didnít know what was happening. I had no idea what was going on.Ē (A: So they were trying to burn him down, and no doubt heíd have been burned to death too if he just hadnít woken up.)
So Mr. Thomson, a former firearms instructor, grabbed one of his Smith & Wesson revolvers from his safe, loaded it and headed outside dressed in only his underwear. (A: He had his permits and his gun safes and all the rest of it, etc, and all the different courses that you have to have in Canada.)
ďHe exited his house and fired his revolver two, maybe three times, weíre not sure. (A: He didnít hit anybody; I donít think he was trying to.) Then these firebombing culprits, they ran off,Ē said his lawyer, Edward Burlew.
His surveillance cameras caught the attackers lobbing at least six Molotov cocktails at his house and bombing his doghouse, singeing one of his Siberian Huskies. (A: Burning it.) But when Mr. Thomson handed the video footage to Niagara Regional Police, he found himself charged with careless use of a firearm. (A: Here you are, going to get burned to the ground and burned to death and what would be a natural response IN ANY ERA, except todayís, is taboo. Well, he should have died, you know; he should have just have thrown his hands up, you know, and been a good citizen and got burned to death.)
The local Crown attorneyís office later laid a charge of pointing a firearm, along with two counts of careless storage of a firearm. The Crown has recommended Mr. Thomson go to jail, his lawyer said. (A: You notice that they say ďThe Crown has recommendedĒ. Do you understand, you donít have democracy. You donít have democracy. The Crown is Her Majestyís jails and so on and Her Majestyís courts and Her Majestyís everything.)
His collection of seven guns, five pistols and two rifles was seized, along with his firearms licence. Mr. Thomson said he lives in fear that his attackers will return and has taken to arming himself with a fire extinguisher.
ďI donít have enemies,Ē said the soft-spoken man, who now studies environmental geosciences full-time at Brock University after being injured in a workplace accident. ďI donít know that many people. Iím a quiet man. I just want to go back to my life and be able to live out my days in relative peace.Ē
So you know, there you go. There were another couple of guys out on the East Coast that it happened to a few months ago too, who did the same kind of thing. They got out together when there were vandals going through the whole street apparently and they ended up in the hot water as well. You cannot defend yourself. Itís called Ďtaking the law into your own handsí Ė wait and be dutifully murdered. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Canada is a very docile country normally. People go along with authority of all kinds, in their everyday life kind of dutifully. Theyíre so well trained; if you do stand in a checkout counter in any store with a long queue and there are maybe 5 empty checkouts where thereís nobody serving, and you complain about it, the rest of them will turn around at you as though you had just, you know, caused a disturbance. Theyíre so well trained; you couldnít want better citizenry for obedience to authority. Iíve mentioned that book before; itís called Obedience To Authority; itís worth getting a hold of because it shows you the psychology behind it and how you are trained and so on and how you react. Theyíre so compliant in Canada they often donít have to pass laws at all. They simply, being an old boys network at the top, they can simply call up their buddies and different CEO positions and get them to go along with basically terrorism acts and so on, stuff like that. Here is an article; itís actually from Wiki in fact.
Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia / wikipedia.org
(A: This is basically so they can monitor everyoneís phone calls and webs and all the rest of it. Listen to thisÖ)
Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act is Canada's (proposed) federal statute governing lawful access. (A: What they mean by that is, lawful means that they can snoop on you as long as they make it law. And thatís okay then. There is no morality or ethics involved in this; itís just what do we want to do Ė letís, okay, pass a law and now itís lawful.) The Act first, requires telephone and Internet service providers to include an interception capability as they introduce new technologies, (A: By the way, back in 1995 Canada and the US signed an agreement that ALL technologies being imported into the country or made in the countries, that are for communication, including your fax machines, everything, had to have chips in them and codes so that the agencies could basically get into them if they want to, all government agencies. Thatís been the law since 1995.) and second, allows law enforcement to compel ISPs to disclose subscriber information without a warrant.
Concerns raised include:
- Creation of new surveillance powers while reducing the level of privacy protection and oversight associated with that surveillance.
- Increased burden to ISPs who would be required to retain traffic data for significant periods of time.
(A: Now listen to this, this particular act.) "MITA" (A: Ö they called it. Theyíre not even as good as the States. In the States they wouldíve put an ĎRí on the end. You can use Ďroyalí you see and say MITAR and it sounds more flashy like a Miter.) was not passed into law, as parliament was dissolved before the bill's final reading. Anticipating passing of this bill, however, ISPs such as Bell Sympatico (A: And most of the other ones, all the other ones did the same thing.) have modified their various policies and agreements to contain language to the effect that they may monitor, investigate, and disclose information to satisfy laws, regulations, or government requests. In February of 2009 Liberal MP Marlene Jennings introduced a private member's bill by the same name.
So you donít even have to make it law here, you just get the people to comply and okay, thatís no problem at all, and away you go. Thatís what they mean by Canada ALSO being a kind of model state for the world. Theyíre very lawful, obedient people in Canada, and all they care about apparently is drinking lots of booze, because thatís the most frequent ads you will see on television, and partying and just rummaging around in the snow and having a good time and stuff like that. So thatís really Canada for you. I was shocked myself to see how docile they are and how little they complain about anything. Itís really astonishing.
Now, you know the only thing that could stop this new world order, and even then I donít know; it depends on the banks who keep churning out little blips on computer screens they call money, to keep up with it, instead of just churning out the paper. The only thing that could bring this world system down is massive corruption and itís all over the place. There is massive corruption at the top. Globalism IS good, for the economy of those at the top. They just rake the cash in with their cons and so on. Tonight Iím also going to put up, by the way, a link to a Dutch accountant I think it was, speaking at the Parliament of Europe, in the parliamentary building for this great money pit, this black hole that sucks in the cash and the life from the people in Europe. She speaks about the corruption inside the EU because there is no accountability where all the billions go. And they want more and more and more all the time. She speaks up about this and if you follow it at the bottom, after youíve watched this little 2-minute clip or whatever, youíll see a bunch of other talks and things that she brought up in parliament. She really goes right into it. She even said they should be ashamed of collecting theirÖ they gave themselves a pay raise after putting up the fees for every country to give to them, by a massive amount, and gave themselves all a pay raise, etc. She said they should all be ashamed of themselves, I think she said.
Dutch whistleblower another warning
Tuesday, 18th January 2011 / ukip.org
Not that it will change anything. But corruption might just bring this whole thing down.† I mean thatís the only hope we have, is they get more corrupt and get away with more and more; theyíll just become incredibly corrupt until it doesnít function anymore. Anyway, the National Health Service system is wonderful for con men and con artists and old boys in the old boy network, where they can pull so many scams because there is so little checking on where the cash goes.
Now the NHS pays £1,000 for a bottle of salt water!
(A: As a medicine, right; as long as itís classed as a medicine you can get £1000 for that. Thereís a good business for anybody to want to go into.)
Last week, we revealed the NHS is being charged £175 for paracetamol. (A: A Pill.)
But as this investigation shows, that's just the tip of the iceberg
dailymail.co.uk / By Adele Waters / 25th January 2011
A pharmacist was shocked to discover an invoice for salt water charging £570. He has been told it soon will be £1,000.
Thousands of patients who have difficulty swallowing pills find taking their medicine in this form difficult ó if not impossible. (A: So they get liquid often.)
As a result, these patients are prescribed their medication in a liquid state. But few of them would realise medicine suppliers are profiteering from their frailty. (A: Well, they should know that anyway.)
Last week, Henrietta Spink wrote in the Mail about her shock on discovering that the liquid ≠paracetamol prescribed to her son cost the NHS a ≠staggering £175 for just 500ml.
As Henrietta said: ĎIf Iíd crushed up painkillers in a spoonful of jam, for example, as I normally do, it would have cost less than £1.í
But her experience is just the tip of the iceberg, as this Good Health investigation reveals.
Weíve discovered that suppliers are charging exorbitant rates for a range of drugs ó and some chemists are colluding with them and getting kickbacks in return.
This means that the NHS is being ripped off for millions of pounds at a time when it needs to watch every penny.
The drugs in question are called specials ó medicines not routinely produced by manufacturers.
Examples of specials include child versions of adult medicines that contain smaller quantities of active drugs or ó the most common form of special ó liquid states of medicines needed for patients who cannot swallow tablets.
It was not that long ago that specials were made up by pharmacists. (A: Thatís true; they made up the stuff right in the pharmacy and it was really pretty cheap.) But now ó partly as a result of EU (A: Again, this EU parliament who is in bed with the big pharma boys.) safety regulations (A: Safety regulations, eh, safety regulations.) ó they are put together by drug suppliers. The average difference in cost between a ≠standard pill version and a specials order is £188, according to an NHS report.
But the difference can sometimes be up to thousands of pounds.
One of the most popular specials is a liquid form of simvastatin, a drug to lower cholesterol. The NHS spent more than £3 million on around 14,000 liquid formulations of this in 2009, at a cost of £208 each (the equivalent amount in pill form costs £1.12).
But there are other, more shocking, price differences. ĎI couldnít believe an invoice I recently received,í one London-based pharmacist told us, on condition on anonymity.
ĎIt was for a supply of sodium chloride solution ó salt water, basically, to treat a child with hormone problems. The charge was £570. Iíve been told it soon will be £1,000. The ingredients would have cost just pennies.í
So itís just amazing, as I say, how the racket goes onÖ the racket goes on. And you know something else too, as everyone gets more and more afraid and the economy is up and down like a yo-yo and theyíre getting all these articles on it in the media about, oh my God, are we crashing or what? Everybody gets incredibly greedy; it kicks in survival. And these characters here just start tacking on incredible amounts for medications. Itís all connected, you understand, to the system in which we live, which is of course not to benefit you. Itís fantastic how things really, really work out.
In another article here, Iíve got to put out too, is to do with the measles, mumps and rubella. Now, a massive world campaign was funded by the big pharma industry to vilify the doctors, the very few doctors, who came out and says thereís a link to autism with these injections, the ones they always give you when the child is getting to say dada and mama and two weeks later he canít say anything. Of course itís just a coincidence that this is a normal pattern for modern autism. Old autism, you could see that there was something wrong from birth on. Now it starts right after the jab.
Scientists fear MMR link to autism
dailymail.co.uk / SALLY BECK/ Jan 23, 2011
New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children. (A: See, this particular darned vaccine will put the problem in different parts of the body, depending on your physiology, your particular physiology. It can affect your brain; most of them go to the brain; they cause fever in the brain. Thatís quite interesting because when the brainís in with fever, like anywhere else where thereís fever, thereís inflammation and cells die off. So maybe that would be helpful for a peaceful, docile population. It can also go to the bowel in other children too, and go into other areas affecting glands where they get allergies.)
The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield (A: He was in the paper not two months ago where they were ridiculing him and ridiculing him. I donít know if they disbarred him or what.), who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.
Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease (A: Very common, they get both together.) - and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus. (A: Now, they can tell itís not the normal measles virus; itís the LAB virus thatís made for the vaccine.)
Last night the team's leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: 'Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain (A: These viruses are VACCINE strains, created by the lab.) and none are wild measles. (A: So itís not the ones that occur in nature.)
'This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus. (A: Iíve been saying that for years.)
'What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is correct. That study didnít draw any conclusions about specifically what it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine. (A: Well, if itís lab created Iíd imagine, well, 2 and 2 equals what?) If thatís the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.'
The 1998 study by Dr Wakefield, then a reader in gastroenterology at the Royal Free Hospital in North London, and 12 other doctors claimed to have found a new bowel disease, autism enterocolitis.
At the time, Dr Wakefield said that although they had not proved a link between MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and autism, there was cause for concern and the Government should offer the option single vaccines (A: Giving them part and so on.) - instead of only MMRs (A: The triple dose.) - until more research had been done.
The paper - and the confused interpretation of its findings - caused uproar and led to many parents withdrawing their co-operation for the triple jab. (A: Then the government of course kicked in millions of pounds to put out propaganda and PR spin to vilify these people, and to tell the people that itís okay to get the autism shots.) Ten of the paper's authors also signed retractions on the interpretation (A: Because literally they were going to lose their licenses; they were told they would lose their licenses if they stuck by their findings.) but stood by the science.
This is the second independent study to back up Dr Wakefield. In 2001 John O'Leary, Professor of Pathology at St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, replicated his findings.
Last night Dr Wakefield said: 'This new study confirms what we found in British children and again with Professor O'Leary. The only exposure these children have had to measles is through the MMR vaccine. (A: They never had the disease; itís only through the vaccine.)
'They were developing normally until they regressed. (A: As I say, theyíll go through the milestones as they call them Ė milestones where youíre learning; theyíre interested in whatís going on around them, they recognize people, look you in the eye and the little words they start to use, and within a week or so after the shots theyíre just like zombies for a while.) They now suffer autism and bowel disease. (A: Remember too, you can get the bowl disease separate from the autism, and lots of folk have since they started all these massive injections. Theyíve grown up with incredible bowl problems.)
'The Department of Health and some of the media wanted to dismiss our research as insignificant. The excuse was that no one else had the same findings as us. What they didn't say is that no one else had looked.' (A: See, the big boys who want to keep their licenses donít go into this kind of stuff; they donít look in there, you know.)
A spokesman for the Department of Health said they had not read the American report, but added: 'MMR remains the best form of protection against measles, mumps and rubella.' (A: So there is the official answer to it you see, because itís big, big cash and theyíre not going to change that because so many end up with autism or bowel disease for their whole darn life. It ainít going to happen.)
Thereís a caller on the line. Itís Mark from Wisconsin. Are you there Mark? Iíll see if I can get you in here.
Mark: Yeah, hey, over here in the States the insurance companies just came out and said that they want to charge extra premiums for people who donít take vaccines. Apparently if you donít get the poison they are not making the kind of money that they want to make on everybody.
Alan: That doesnít surprise me. I mean, insurance companies and all these big organizations, the big big banks and all the rest of it, big pharma, if you could possibly trace all these companies, through all the different fronts that they have, itís like going through the Cayman Islands trying to trace dirty money. Youíll find theyíre all owned by the same peoples. Insurance companies, actually it was Jacques Attali who wrote A Brief History of the Future. He said that insurance companies will be the way that the world will be run in the future, in the next 10-20 years; everything will be privatized, insurance companies will dictate policies, even for hospitals and everything else. Theyíre already doing it for houses. They can tell you if theyíll insure you. If you have, say, you are burning anything except the authorized oil, for heating, if you are using a wood stove, they wonít insure you. You see. Stuff like that. So they have more power.
Mark: Isnít if funny how all the insurance companies have Masonic symbols on their titles and all that?
Alan: Oh, itís not funny. Itís just them giving us the finger. Because of course they are. Theyíre all connected into this same old system thatís run the world for such a long time. I watch the trains go by here often, and of course they all come from China Ė Hansung and all this kind of stuff on the carriages Ė because itís not passengers; itís all cargo Ė this is from coast to coast, this train, Canadian National and Pacific. Youíll see every company name Ė for cargo there are big carriages Ė they all have the Masonic symbols all over them, every single one, from every country. So youíre quite right. Thanks for calling. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back, Cutting Through The Matrix. As I say, all these containers that come off the ships from wherever the ports are, in BC and elsewhere, from China, are all owned by different groups all over the world and they ALL have Masonic symbolism on them, every single one of them. Itís quite something to watch.
Now, as Britain really is the first to show the way for the rest of the European countries, to show the way that eventually thereíll be no countries at all. Youíll just be regions under the EU parliament, and that is the plan of course. Theyíre amalgamating the forces now.
FRENCH WANT BRITISH AND GERMAN ARMIES TO UNITE
(A: This is the next step.)
express.co.uk / January 24,2011 / By Martyn Brown, Political Correspondent
FRANCE wants Britain to join with Germany to form a military partnership in which all three will share equipment and troops. (A: Actually, they share officers too.)
The move could see the Germans join an expeditionary force set up as part of the Anglo-French defence pact in November as well as all three sharing transport aircraft and air refuelling tankers.
This is the start of the total integration. They already have a kind of army formed already where they take part as the EU army and so on. So itís just ongoing, step by step towards this. Theyíve got all the time in the world to complete their missions and their agendas and manifestos. Of course we just have to suffer all through it, at least the ones that are awake. If youíre not awake then they say ignorance is bliss, and itís so true isnít it? You can just play and follow your indoctrination from television, and who is going to bother you?
Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest players. Itís amazing, the Sachs family, because you can go into them from Holland and Germany and elsewhere. Roosevelt himself was related to Sachs, you know, the big banking boy. Itís all in the family isnít it? This saysÖ
Goldman Sachs bankers to receive $15.3bn in pay and bonuses
guardian.co.uk / Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk / Wednesday 19 January 2011
Goldman Sachs has set aside $15.3bn (£9.5bn) to pay its staff in 2010 (A: This is for the City of London.) Ė an average of $430,000 each Ė in a move that re-ignites the controversy over City pay and bonuses at a time when youth unemployment is hitting record highs in the UK. (A: Iíll add, theyíre closing all the hospitals now.)
The best known of all the Wall Street firms did not attempt to show the restraint of last year when it reduced the amount being paid into its bonus pool in the fourth quarter of 2009 to make a $500m public donation to a charitable foundation (A: Their own charitable foundationÖ), Goldman Sachs Gives. (A: Of course Goldman Sachs Gives no doubt will lobby government to get things that Goldman Sachs wants. I mean, beautiful con, eh? Tax write-off too.)
The $15.3bn set aside for bonuses and salaries was down 5% on the $16bn for the previous year but did not fall as fast as revenues, which dropped 13% to $39.1bn in 2010. (A: Regardless that they actually claimed they made less money this year than at other times.)
Another article too, is to do with what Iíve said for years, now theyíre blaming the older folk in Britain because theÖ
Ageing population putting Britain under 'unsustainable' pressure,
Britain faces more painful austerity within a decade to address the ďunsustainableĒ pressure the countryís ageing population is putting on the economy, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has warned.
telegraph.co.uk / Philip Aldrick / 30 Nov 2010
And who says this? Well it comes from the BUDGET RESPONSIBILITY OFFICE. This is a country thatís never balanced anything. In fact itís very unbalanced. And here they are saying that the aging populationÖ It wasnít the banks that did them under, it wasnít joining the EU parliament and paying for 2 parliaments now Ė and the EU one is a big black hole; it just sucks everything into it, all the cash. It was nothing to do with that, and then bailing the banks out and all the rest of it. No, itís the older folk you see, itís just unsustainable Ė and thatís the term theyíre using by the way, Ďunsustainable.í See, youíve been trained step by step all along with the greenies and the media and so on; the old folk are Ďunsustainableí. Maybe it would be better to turn them into Soylent Green and sell them back to the public and make a profit, eh? That will come down the road one day when they say, oh itís scientifically cleansed, this stuff, and the proteins are the same as any other proteins, and they give you top scientists to convince you of that. Then the ones who are more avant-garde, oh that doesnít scare me; theyíll buy it first and Oprah will have it on and away it goes.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
UN Human Rights Official Claims Unanswered Questions
Concerning Official 9-11 Story
State Bankruptcy Bill imminent
Food Stamps--A Growth Industry for JP Morgan
Gruesome Greenies Anoint Saint Genghis Khan as Example for Followers
Canada, Defending the Home and the Law
Canada and its "Policy" of Surveillance
Corruption in EU Parliament auditing
Corruption in National Health System
MMR Jab Again Linked to Autism
Next Step in EU--Armies to Amalgamate
Goldman Sachs and Banker Bonuses
Ageing Population Unsustainable--Usual Propaganda
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"