Nov. 30, 2010 (#716)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 30, 2010:
Cancun Says Rationing Coming
Redistribution of Wealth is Bad for Our Health:
"Climate Summit Priests are Busy Fashioning
The Next Phase into Food/Energy Rationing,
For the Wealthier Nations Only, Of Course,
And Since They are the Only Source
Of Wealth and Borrowing Power, They Say,
To Bring Up the Third World They Will Pay,
While Their Own Countries Fall to Dust,
As U.N. Dictates They Should and Must,
When We're Back to Mud Huts We'll Be Sustainable,
With Hunger, Disease, Medicine Unobtainable"
© Alan Watt Nov. 30, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 30, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 30, 2010. Newcomers to the show should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com; thatís my web site. Youíll see all the official sites listed on the front page. Bookmark them for future use Ė itís awful handy if the .com site goes down. You will always get a clean download, hopefully, from the other sites. Thatís sometimes what happens, so many folk go into the .com site at the same time for downloads that sometimes you experience kind of sticking on the download. Try these alternate sites on the front page. They all have transcripts of a lot of the talks to go along with the audios and you can print them up in English. If you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu; once again, there is a link on the .com site to it and you can choose from a variety of languages of the world. Remember, you are the audience that brings me to you, so please support me. Itís up to you. I can go off and do other things and start earning money for a change because you donít earn anything here, believe you me. Itís just scraping by at the moment. So for those that want to support me, in these dangerous times and thatís the only reason I am out here right now trying to educate the people on the history of how we got here and who is behind it and where itís going, then support me by buying the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Order and donation options listed above.]
Thatís really what we are left with these days, because everything is going wireless, as the wireless transactions and electronic cash, etc and that seems to be how the big boys want it because they can really keep tabs on everyoneís spending and incomes and all the rest of it. Thatís really one of the main reasons the internet is out there, apart from conditioning everyone to put all their data on there so they can get a good, full personality profile on you and mark you down as safe, or unstable, or maybe a problem and all of that kind of stuff, which is going on and has been going on since the beginning.
We are going through the greatest change in history weíve experienced for centuries. The big boys themselves admitted that a long time ago, even when I was young. They knew it was all coming up and they knew they were integrating the world under a standardized system. Not a nice democratic system, where supposedly the people are served by the government. Itís the other way around. The people are there to serve the government of the world in this particular system. We are now in a post-democratic system and thatís a pretty well officially come out from the Club of Rome. Democracy was too slow and cumbersome, too many competing, conflicting parties all demanding things, that they said they could get nothing done. So that great UN think tank said theyíd have to go post-democratic, into an authoritarian type of society, to speed things up and get it moving. And since 2001 youíve seen enough of that already, Iím sure, and yet you ainít seen nothing yetÖ in a sense, as to what really is coming down. The big boys, again, in many of their books, the ones who attended all the global meetings, through the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, wrote in their memoirs about this wonderful utopia they are bringing in, where we all obey the masters. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, Iíve gone over so many different big authorsí books and quotes and given you the statements by them and where they planned to bring the world. They talked about standardizing a whole world system using the British Empire initially, in the earlier phases of it, as a nucleus basically that theyíd build around for a global empire. Itís interesting to note too, that the drafters of this, who were based in London at the time, primarily, and in America, through the Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. They said that initially Britain would pay the costs in men and equipment, taxations and so on to bring in this world system, across the world, and then theyíd hand it to the US, which is exactly what they did in fact and the US has been paying for it since. Interesting too, they also knew that the quality of life in their own countries would go down.
These top guys were eugenicists. They wanted to use the masses. They knew that too, they would lose an awful lot of them in the big wars they planned to take over the world. But they also knew theyíd take down the masses once they started to near their goal. Thatís what you are seeing now, with the cries on depopulation from the big boys like Rockefeller, Bill Gates, and that other front woman who gives most people their views, most women their views, definitely on daily television, Oprah Winfrey. They all belong to the luck gene club, as they like to call it. They have talked about rapid depopulation. Itís time now for rapid depopulation. People cannotÖ they have a terrible time trying toÖ they get lost in the emotive speeches that are given by big players at big meetings. They fall for the propaganda. Whereas those in on the act know to read between the lines and what they are really aiming at, so they donít get confused with the wonderful sounding charitable aims that these people are pushing. They donít get confused at all. They know what their main primary goals are.
We know that there are many meetings going on now to do with climate change, of course. Itís just a new priesthood for you. Various big players talked about bringing in a new priesthood, a scientific priesthood. These characters really are anything but scientific. I call them the weather priests because they are all getting very handsomely paid for their non-governmental organizations, and some of the scientists too, a lot of the scientists, well, pretty well all the scientists at the meetings are living high on the hog now because of this new religion of global warming. It doesnít matter if hell freezes over, they are still going to call it global warming. It doesnít matter if God came down himself, whatever God you want to choose from, and told them they were all wrong; theyíd have to nuke him because the agenda is set in stone. This is the one thing that they have hinged everything on. To change the world by rationing, and I said at 2001 when it came along, youíll see a whole war scenario across the world including rationing, and this is the start of rationing coming, supposedly to save the world.
These guys at the top are the greatest con artists youíll ever meet. They work for the biggest players and the richest men on the planet back them. Eventually you will have no rights, no property, and you will be gradually brought down in population, very quickly, apart from the slow sterilization techniques they have used so far on the general populations of the West with inoculations and their food, their GMO food and so on. Youíll also get taken down much quicker in the very near future. I think they have already started it in fact. You know, you can live in areas for an awful long time and adapt, you adapt, we are a very adaptable species as they know at the top, and when the death rate starts going up in your areas, you initially say, oh, thatís a bit strange, and people might chat here or there, or they might not at all, generally they donít. And you can come to accept new high levels of death very, very quickly and take it as a new normal. We already treat cancer as a new normal. At one time cancers were very rare. It was taught in medical schools that the most common ones now, were extremely rare at one time. Only 30-40 years ago they were very rare cancers. Now they are just busting out all over. Just like all the test animals that they fed the GMO foods to.
This climate priesthood club are meeting in Cancun to push the next bit of the scary scenarios. Iíll put up tonight too, a link to some of the quotes that they have given in the past where the top leaders of these summits admitted to their own, you know, their own converted crowd, the other lesser priests down below them, that we always give out scary scenarios to make the public succumb and give in to our demands. SCARY SCENARIOSÖ
"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest."
- Prof. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports
They have all these ridiculous scary scenarios, right out, at this moment, this is when they churn them all out, all ridiculous stuff, utterly scary you see, because they have nothing to base their bogus science on, as we go into a cooling period. Britain is under snow right now and lots more to come.
Anyway, here you go, from this article hereÖ
Cancun climate change summit:
scientists call for rationing in developed world
(Alan: So there you go. I said it in 2001, you will get rationing, because in all war scenarios Ė and they are using perpetual war strategy now, on the whole world. Perpetual wars, one thing after another, never-ending war, war on this, war on that, and war on terror, which is actually a war, or a reign, of terror on your mind. So they are calling for rationingÖ in the DEVELOPED world.)
Global warming is now such a serious threat to mankind that climate change experts
(A: You see, these priests are Ďexperts.í) are calling for Second World War-style rationing in rich countries to bring down carbon emissions.
By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent 29 Nov 2010 / telegraph.co.uk
(A: Itís interesting that every top scientist has said that carbon FOLLOWS a warming period. Theyíve got all these amazing graphs and so on that go back for hundreds and hundreds of years to prove their points, but that doesnít matter. Facts donít matter in this particular religion, because itís a mission. Itís really a missionÖ to change us and to get us all paying carbon taxes and paying for every breath that you breathe, CO2.)
In a series of papers published by (A: Guess who? The Masonic Royal SocietyÖ) the Royal Society (A: The ones with the Royal Charter to exist.), physicists and chemists from some of worldís most respected scientific institutions, including Oxford University and the Met Office (A: That all live in grantsÖ), agreed that current plans to tackle global warming are not enough. (A: They never will be, of course. And you should see how many jets that they fly all of these characters around in, to go to these meetings. Itís just amazing. And then they have their 20 course lunches. Some of them have even got spas in their rooms. This is the upper class, the ones that are going to make you, tell you how to live in little mud huts.)
Unless emissions are reduced dramatically in the next ten years the world is set to see temperatures rise by more than 4C (7.2F) (A: Utter tripe. Tripe!) by as early as the 2060s, causing floods, droughts and mass migration. (A: Weíve all got the massive migration already, and itís forced migration, and itís encouraged by the United Nations, and itís also economic.)
As the world meets in Cancun, Mexico for the latest round of United Nations talks on climate change, the influential academics called for much tougher measures to cut carbon emissions.
In one paper Professor Kevin Anderson, Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, (A: These guys used to get paid peanuts because no one cared about the weather. No one could predict the weather and suddenly itís a science. They can tell you exactly how itís going to be, all these SCARY scenarios. And they are living high on the hog now, like kings, with all of this money thrown at them. So these guys have got a lot to loseÖ if, IF, not that it will be, proven bogus, because it is a bogus religion that they are involved with.) said the only way to reduce global emissions enough, while allowing the poor nations to continue to grow, is to halt economic growth in the rich world over the next twenty years. (A: WE are rich, by the way, all of us countries that are now paying, for the next 500 years with compound taxes to pay off all these debts incurred by the banks going down. WE are the rich guys. We are the rich guys that are paying for all of these third world countries to build all their polluting factories and so on abroad. Because they are exempt from it; Iíll be touching on that next. They are exempt on that for 20 years, which can renewed for another 20 years. So they can pump out as much as they want. But you guys, light up a cigarette and you will be decapitated, in public.)
This would mean a drastic change in lifestyles for many people in countries like Britain as everyone will have to buy less Ďcarbon intensiveí goods and services such as long haul flights and fuel hungry cars. (A: Youíd think they were talking about themselves, all these rich pigs at the top. And thatís what they are. They are pigsÖ because they are liars too.)
Prof Anderson admitted it ďwould not be easyĒ to persuade people to reduce their consumption of goods. (A: Remember what they have said too? This is the post-consumerist society; they decided that a long time ago. Post-consumerism is all part of this. So this is getting used for also pushing THAT particular agenda as well.)
He said politicians should consider a rationing system similar to the one introduced during the last ďtime of crisisĒ in the 1930s and 40s.
This could mean a limit on electricity so people are forced to turn the heating down, turn off the lights and replace old electrical goods like huge fridges with more efficient models. (A: Which by the way they have tested and they have found they are no more efficient than the old ones; some of them are worse.) Food that has travelled from abroad may be limited and goods that require a lot of energy to manufacture. (A: The thing is too, these same governments, under the United Nations agendas, have been forcing the small farmers off the land for years, since World War II, with ever steeper and steeper requirements and so on, making it impossible for them to carry on. So a lot of countries now are dependent for imports of food, because no one is growing it at home. Think about that too, I hope.)
ďThe Second World War and the concept of rationing is something we need to seriously consider if we are to address the scale of the problem we face,Ē he said.
Prof Anderson insisted that halting growth in the rich world does not necessarily mean a recession or a worse lifestyle, (A: Oh, really?) it just means making adjustments (A: Thatís allÖ adjustmentsÖ) in everyday life such as using public transport and wearing a sweater rather than turning on the heating. (A: Iím sure heíll be doing that tooÖ You know, where he looks at the stars and makes comparisons with the zodiac, looks at the Cabala and says, yep, thereís going be a really high increase in CO2. Thatís really what it boils down to. Itís utter nonsense.)
ďI am not saying we have to go back to living in caves,Ē he said. ďOur emissions were a lot less ten years ago and we got by ok then.Ē
The last round of talks in Copenhagen last year ended in a weak political accord to keep temperature rise below the dangerous tipping point of 2C(3.6F). (A: Well, it hasnít gone upÖ so whatís his problem? I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. Iím back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, reading this awful article from the Telegraph. Itís really a PR piece. Itís a propaganda piece to scare us all to get ready for the next phase, and now itís going to be rationing of all kinds of things. They are going to eventually bring in carbon taxes on every individual person. Not everybody on the planet, all the third world countries will be exempt for 20 years or so, as we put all our money over there to build factories and so on for them. Thatís what we did in China, by the way. China didnít make itself. It was created by the Western countries under agreements with the World Trade Organization. Thatís why we paid for the factories, that we all had at one time. We paid for them to uproot and go all the way to China, set up there again, all by your tax money, and they could actually claim losses for the first 10 years if they claimed they werenít getting the expected profits in by then, which could be extended for another 10 years if need be. And they are all doing it. You have no idea whatís been happening. None at all. You are mushrooms: you are kept in the dark and fed you know what.
There is another article here on Cancun which touches on a few things. I think itís got some pretty good stuff here. Itís from India, but it does touch on a few aspects, such as the accord. See, this meeting right now on climate is really a big economic summit to do with redistribution of the worldís wealth, from, you know, you rich guys out there, that are all bankrupt, to the other countries where the big boys have already set up shop. I donít know if you realize, when they keep saying Ďemerging nations,í isnít it interesting that a few years ago, and I read it on the air here, the Republic Broadcasting Radio. I read on the air that the Rothschild family, and I put the link up too, there was a video there, where they were going into India. They had already demolished so much of Indian farming by putting them under because of the genetically modified seed that Monsanto and others were pushing on them. And you canít keep the seed; it doesnít grow the next year. Youíve got to buy new stuff every year. And they were forced to use the pesticides; it was literally destroying their land and their water supplies and everything else. Then they were committing suicide by the THOUSANDS, literally thousands, and they still are by the way. But there is Rothschild just buying them up by the thousands. You see, these boys go in and they put their money in Ė this is an old tactic with the Rothschilds. You just demolish your potential enemy and you take all that heís got for peanuts. Thatís what they did. They were determined, through the UN and all their front groups, they would take over India and the whole economy. Theyíd be, theyíd own the economy of India, and all the food supply as well. They did the same thing, by the way, in Brazil, this other up-and-coming country. It didnít happen by itself. Itís because the money is poured in by the big boys and sure enough, there is Rothschild again, buying masses and masses of land for the last few years. Because thatís going to get matched, through the UN, dollar for dollar, with all the other groups that must then go in. Great, great scams eh? But not for anyone else; just for themselves, you see. They have been at this for a long, long time, these guysÖ lots of experience down through the centuries.
From this particular article hereÖ
Cancun summitís success hinges on ICA
(A: Thatís another accord that they made to do with redistribution of wealth.)
Amitabh Sinha / Tue Nov 30 2010 / indianexpress.com
(A: Further down the page this particular author saysÖ)
Cancun : For the second successive year, the success of the annual climate change conference ó the two-week meetings began in the Mexican resort town on Monday ó seems to hinge on how much major developing countries like India are willing to let the international community scrutinize the actions they are taking to tackle the problem. (A: See, they are exempt from it. They can put out smokestacks there, fueled by coal and everything else, the same as China and Brazil, and there are no penalties whatsoever. Because they are bringing them up as they take us down. But we are paying for it all.)
Unlike the rich countries (A: They still call us rich countriesÖ) ó grouped together in Annex-I of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol ó developing countries like China, India or Brazil are not required to cut down on their greenhouse gas emissions, the single biggest reason for global warming.
But in view of their rapidly increasing emissions ó China is already the largest emitter in the world while India is fourth largest ó there is a near unanimity that unless these countries also take steps to control the growth of their emissions, the battle with climate change cannot be won by the human race.
However, while the rich countries are bound by an international treaty (A: Öjust to let you all know, which your own papers arenít telling you; you have to go to India to find out.) to reduce their emissions by specified targets over a time period, the major developing nations are only expected to take voluntary actions that will help in reducing the global emissions over a long period. Both India and China, for example, have offered to take steps to increase their energy efficiencies. (A: Again, itís voluntary.)
Here is where one of the major faultlines of the climate negotiations lies. Developed countries feel that India or China is at an obvious advantage, (A: Well naturally. If everyone else is going to pay through the nose for every little bit of heat you have, and you are paying for all the energy to make that little cell phone you are damaging your brain with, and you have to pay the carbon tax on that by the way, then of course the guys who pay nothing are going to just go ahead in leaps and bounds.) as the purely voluntary nature of their commitments mean they cannot be held accountable. (A: Like China and so on.) The rich countries therefore are in favour of developing a mechanism to hold these nations to their word. India or China do not want any outsider to supervise their actions and argue that they are already making a concession by taking specific actions that ó unlike the Annex-I countries ó they are not legally mandated to take. (A: So you see, we are already bound to pay for that. But mind you, we are already paying for their hospitals in China Ė I hope you all realize that Ė because they are still classed as a third world country. The biggest producer in the world in manufacturing is still classified, under their legal definitions, as a third world country. So weíve got to build THEIR hospitals, the same in India and the same in Latin America. Thatís the deal folks. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. Weíre back, Cutting Through The Matrix. So from Cancun to the International Conference on Population and Development, itís the 15th anniversary for those that donít know this vital important thing. Hillary Clinton was the main speaker there of course. Itís all about depopulation. I had a caller last night who asked about depopulation in third world countries and I mentioned that Kissinger brought it up years ago and put a bill through on depopulating the third world because it was the most major threat to national security. Of course there were other countries that were involved with it. It goes through the United Nations under the guise of helping women. So I mentioned at the beginning of the show too, that people donít know how to read things. They get caught up by the emotional stuff thatís put inside, by the script writers because script writers write all this stuff for these people to parrot, like Hillary Clinton, because her mouth cannot get around half of the stuff thatís even on here. Her brain certainly doesnít work that way. Her mouth is like a sailor actually.
Sheís so worried, being a good mum and all, about the health of women across the world and she wants to make sure, as they all do of course, that they have the rights to health care, family planning and all the rest of it, which means abortion and sterilization and so on and so on. She mentions the commitment to achieve the MILLENNIUM Development Goal 5. Now, the Millennium Development Goals are also part of Agenda 21. They are alternating terms for the same thing. The UN eventually was advised to change it because we were all mentioning and reading off the Agenda 21, from the United Nations, the big long-term plan for depopulation and so on, and getting us all into sustainable habitats, through our much smaller societies and so on. They changed it to Millennium Development Goals and they also use Sustainable Development for the same agenda as well.
Remarks on the 15th Anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development
Hillary Rodham Clinton - Secretary of State, Washington, DC / January 8, 2010 / state.gov
(A: They haveÖ) Millennium Development Goal Five, namely a [three-fourths] reduction in global maternal mortality, and universal access to reproductive healthcare. This goal is, again, critical to and interconnected with every other millennium development goal. (A: And it is; they are all connected together, depopulation, etc, etc. Well, you go through the female for that, you see.) But the world has made less progress toward fulfilling that goal than any other. (A: Then she goes on about the money that the US alone is going to pump into it; thatís your tax money again folks, for those who donít know; these are not charitable institutions.)
The U.S. Congress recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and reproductive health programs worldwide. (A: Sounds wonderful, health programsÖ Health is a nice word and they use these touchy-feely nice words to do the most drastic awful things. Iíll put this link up as well on my web sites at the end of the show and you can look it up for yourself.)
There is a caller on the line and itís Clint from Ontario. Are you there Clint?
Clint: Hello, Alan. Thank you for taking my call. The caller last night touched on the subject, the female; she mentioned Zionism to you as well. As you know, I wanted to talk to you about that, about the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion from Bill Cooperís book. After reading it, it really solidifies my opinion that not only World War II, what they did with the Jews there, it kept people from bringing up Zionism or anything to do with the Jews and to make it seem like everybody would be anti-Semitic to this plan. Now, with this protocols, a lot of people have said, that Iíve seen on the net anyway, have said that itís a bunch of bull. But after reading it I find it amazing, like how true it is to whatís going on today, like every aspect of government, controlling government, banks, not only Masonry, but the media, everything. After talking with a friend of mine here in town who I befriended a while ago, heís taught me a lot, not only with the corruption but in life itself, finding myself and whatnot. But he says itís just a part of the plan, like rewriting history. Like youíve said yourself, with King James and Francis Bacon and Karl Marx and all those guys, and how itís a part of the plan and they just keep rewriting history here. Now, youíve also mentioned in your book, with zion, it is spelled with an ĎsíÖ
Alan: Öas well.
Clint: Yeah. Is that a God to them orÖ
Alan: Itís Cabalistic. Youíve got to understand, in Cabala you can use the first couple of letters of two words together. So the old term for the wilderness of sinÖ sin, sin also is the moon, by the way. So you take Ďsií and you have the moon. ĎOní itself is one of the names of the obelisk or the virile parts of man, or the world agenda. So thatís where the word Ďhardí comes from; the hard followed by, you know. It comes right out of that language in that particular religion you might say. It goes all the way back to ancient Egypt. So the obelisk was also an Ďoní as well as a Ďben-bení; there are different names for different descriptions of aspects of it. The Ďoní was the power. So you have literally also a refection of the moon and sun together, the harmony, also the opposites together, through a dialectic you always end up with the desired effect. They did this even in ancient times in Egypt as well. They loved the puns on words; they would put puns on words. Itís interesting even in Egyptian the word for your natural son, an offspring, is Ďsení. Of course the term for the sun is Ďsuní, for in the sky. So they love the puns in words and we still have that today. There is a lot of that of course done in Cabala with the first couple letters of each word put together. Itís a form of opposites.
Clint: You show that good in your books, like how certain English words now, a thing like zion and other words, are broken down with that, the meanings into the words.
Alan: Oh, absolutely; there is no doubt about it. Itís too many, even in the English language, introduced into the English language, to be happenstance and coincidence. You canít keep falling over coincidences with so many different words.
Clint: Itís almost like a code, right?
Alan: Well, actually they use it like a code and Masons use it too. Albert Pike talked about that. He said that, we never speak so plainly as when Ė we Masons heís talking about Ė we talk to each other in public, because the public hear one thing and of course the Masons get a different meaning. So they talk like this. This is their way of amusing themselves in fact. Scion also meant a cutting, a cutting of a plant, as a scion. So when you graft a cutting from a plant to get a hybrid going, you are cutting a scion; itís a scion. Itís also the same with your offspring; heís a cutting, like off of the father whoís bred him, and the mother of course. They wrap this into the Tree of Life mysticism and so on. They love mystic language in Freemasonry. So you join the Tree of Life, when you are high up there and you have all of the credentials to join THE Tree of Life as such.
Clint: It could be like a more advanced form of Gematria again, right?
Alan: Yeah. They also sometimes put a Ďscioní in there (just to confuse you with a Ďsioní) which is the splice off of it. When you have the phonetic words spoken, and they all sound the same, there is a reason for them all sounding the same; itís because itís part of an ancient tradition. Remember too, that Bacon and these guys were all part of the Rosicrucians and Queen Elizabeth the 1st, her court was staffed really by the first openly Rosicrucian court in Britain.
Clint: So could they all be likeÖ are they Jews? Like all of them?
Alan: No. No, you donít have to be. You could be grafted into it. Thatís where the confusion comes in to a lot of this too. There is no doubt whatsoever, there are societies that go down through the ages, even many Jews are unaware that there are societies within Judaism, with a different agenda all together in fact than what they think. Weíve had the Sabbatians, for instance; they were a massive group led by a messiah in the Middle Ages. He was going to attack Medina I think it was, and then the local Prince got a hold of it and captured him and his followers. They all converted to Islam. But then they infiltrated Islam and kept their own secret society going. Later on another member, a later member, became Catholic and brought it, all these residents, into the Catholic Church as well. Initially theyíd all been Judaic. But they did not believe in traditional Judaism either. They believed in pure Cabala; there was no good or evil. In fact you needed both of them, they believed, to make a perfect singularity, of a person or a world for that matter, the constant conflicting part. They also say that anything that comes through the ensof, the holy spirit type thing, call it what you want, from the creator Ė any thing that a human being could do Ė and that goes for all perversions as well Ė therefore was a natural thing to go through. So it gave license to behave any way you wished to. Interesting too, in one of their groups, that infiltrated the Catholic Church eventually, they had particular daughters that were specially bred, just like the Freemasons talked about with their dollies, and it was the highest honor was to mate, not marry but mate, and perhaps have an offspring, with the daughters of some of these very high members. Thatís official stuff. Youíll find that even in Wikipedia.
Clint: One more thing I wanted to ask you, since you were talking about what we could do about what they are doing. For somebody like myself, to go out and to be an activist, to hand out literature, to hand out DVDs, or to tell everybody about whatís going on. You can only do so much. Itís like my friend told me too, you are just pissing in the windÖ more or less.† Now, thereís got to be another way to try and awake the masses where you are not sounding like a preacher, or you are not coming off as a conspiracy nut. I was wondering, yourself, if you have an opinion or an idea for what someone like myself and other listeners of yours, who want to get the message out, to let people know about the chemtrails and Agenda 21, and all the poisoning, is there something that we should be doing? Or that we could do that would maybe help along with the process? Or are we just all screwed and this is just a plan throughout history and itís going to happen no two ways about it?
Alan: Our main problem is the scientific techniques of dumbing us down, that Bertrand Russell talked about, that were already being implemented in his day. What you are seeing around you is the final outcome of it all. The people truly are dumbed down. They have been given a dumbed down education. They do believe that the media will tell them all they need to know. They are entertained, more than they are actually informed about anything. They have been trainedÖ they have been trained through, again, scientific methods of repetition, even through adverts. Youíd be surprised how many of the same little phrases youíll hear through all different kinds of ads, but they are all the same, to reinforce the primal indoctrination. Itís through everything. Itís through their movies. Itís through what they watch in comedies. They are constantly being trainedÖ and you cannot get through to most of them. It almost isÖ
Clint: Itís a pointless causeÖ so to speak.† I hate to say that because I donít want to be one to just give up. I know there could be change butÖ
Alan: The thing is, we really are at the bottom here of an anything but democratic structure. There has never been real democracy. Most of them who are still spouting on about democracy today are special interest groups who are pushing what appears to be the left wing causes, but itís actually the global causes for their masters who are the richest people on the planet. And a lot of those guys who follow are simply brainwashed, happy fools, the willing fools. They are willing fools, as Albert Pike called them. They donít really know what they are championing on, or bringing in even by their championing. Their leaders certainly do. There is nothing out there, there is no lobby group whatsoever from the grassroots that wants a different system, or even a system that we thought we had but didnít. In the US for instance, here is a dilemma in the US. Most folk are trying to go back to what they saw as a golden age. What period in time do they want to go back to? You see? Do you want to go back to the Great Depression when the bankers collapsed the economies then and thousands of folk wereÖ there was starvation in the US then. Do you want to go back when outside forces gave you the Civil War and you were slaughtering each other? Do you want to go back where Wilson, under the command of the Milner Group from Britain through Lord Grey, got them involved in World War I? Or do they want to take up the burden of another world war? They are already paying for the war on the world right now, by standardizing the world, massive debt, they canít get out of it, and this is going to finish them off; itís intended to finish them off as a people.
Clint: Thatís where World War II comes in, where it gave everybody kind of a false sense of freedom. Like we liberated the tyranny and now we are free.
Alan: That was it.
Clint: And now for the past 50 years, America has only thought that they are a free nation really.
Alan: And to be honest with you too, I look at the cultural society thatís been created by the media and the big boys who have brought it down to the most debased level. Itís completely debased. There is no morality anymore, you understand. Young people are emulating what they see. The girls are emulating what they see. Everyone is being kept as a perpetual teenager, even though they are 60 or 70 that has watched television. People donít get older and wiser, they get petrified of getting old and they spend all their money trying to look young. Itís incredible whatís been done on society. What you really need is a movement to bring back a workable society, with common values, common values, and no special interest groups, no special rights for any special minority and all this stuff. It has to go back to basic values for the people in general. Without that you are done for; there is nothing to stand up for when everyone is debauched at the bottom. The corruption IN society, the personal corruption has gone so deep. We have all the degeneration that has been pushed through the sexual revolutions. We accept abortion, and here I am reading about what they are doing in the third world countries, we accept that. And we go on about Adolf Hitler and his chimneys. Every town and village and city across the country has hospitals with weekly days set aside for nothing but abortions, and those chimneys are working well. And we think thatís all normal. Something is wrong. We have no value on life. And if you donít have any value on life, then those masters in control can do anything they want with you or your neighbor and no one cares.
Clint: Thatís what I find when you try to tell people about these wars and whoís backing them and how people are being maimed. I tell them, one day that could be here, and they are like, no, no, itís not going to happen here. Then when you speak to them you almost get like a gang mentality, of people who gang up on you, and then they start ridiculing you and name calling and stuff.
Alan: Well, they will because they are conditioned.
Clint: It goes back to that programming, like you said, like itís a conspiracy nut, you know.
Alan: Yes. And they have conditioned responses put to them, by the media again, where, again, celebrities come out on television and they will use the term conspiracy nut. So thatís all they have to do is parrot that. After all, a celebrity said it.† Thanks for calling and I'll be back after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. You have to remember too, that regardless of the protocols and so on, because they will always be controversial as to who wrote it, go into the writings of the founders of the Zionist movement because they are out there for your perusal, if you want to buy them.
These guys were far more explicit in their aims and their goals, and itís from their ownÖ itís from the horseís mouth, the actual founders. Itís kind of scary actually when you read them. Itís also Darwinian. Youíve got to understand, since there were so many Jews in Germany even in the 1800s, and of course even you find that Moses Hess really was the guy who came up with the idea, eventually, later in his life, for a homeland for Israel. He wanted it based exactly where it is; itís in Palestine, he said. They took his bones over and heís over there in Israel today. He was the guy who really was behind Karl Marx and Engels. Itís very Darwinian and he said himself that they got their nationalistic ideas from Germany that was rising up at that time as a nationalist country; all the countries were going nationalistic, and proud and ready to fight each other. So that went into their own particular understanding for their own people and gave them the same idea.
At the same time you had Charles Darwin and Darwin was on about the survival of the species. Of course the ones who survive are the most vicious and cruel and just look after their own. Technically, technically Israel is doing exactly what Darwin would propose, making sure that against all odds they will come out on top for their own people. As I say, they really are an example for everyone else to copy, if they care to. There is nobody else to copy. They are the only nation allowed to be utterly nationalistic now, in the whole world, while everyone else is getting taken down the tubes and losing whatever culture that they thought that they had. See, there are two ways of looking at everything. And always remember that, two ways of looking at everything. But yeah, there are definite societies within every organized group and people. We are run by all kinds of groups and many of them are linked together under the same lodges.
Iíll try and get Emily in for the last minute if weíve got a minute to spare here. Are you there Emily?
Emily: I am. I amÖ and now listening to you I want to change my question. Iím curious as to why Israel would be the only nationalistic nation left.
Alan: Because they have never compromised with any other country. They have never compromised with any UN charter. They remind me of the Soviet system because, again too, itís got a lot in common with the early Soviet system. The Soviet system would never agree with all the different agreements at the United Nations that they put out for the rest of the countries. Russia would just say no and Israel is exactly the same. Because they are well aware too that once you start compromising you start to lose. A compromise is actually losing. Whenever you compromise on anything you are losing something. And by their traditions and...
Emily: And they are able to have that luxury to do that, and we are so, you know, beyond our controlÖ
Alan: Because the largest lobbying groups in the world are Jewish groups. Thatís no secret, every country has admitted it. They are the largest groups for lobbying, so they do lobby. They do put their time and energy and their money out on nobody but their own people, and thatís why they will survive.
Emily: Then itís by design. Itís the same design. I mean, itís by design that we are brought down and itís by design that they will survive.
Alan: The old statement, you see, thatís still quoted every week today, is, the nations come and go but Israel is forever. Youíve got to understand what that means. Thanks for calling, the music is coming in.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Scenario" Quotes from Climate Priests
Cancun Climate Religion Summit---Rationing for Developed Nations
Cancun Summit and Pollution
Hillary Clinton--Reproductive Health Care the Primal Issue (Depopulation)