November 5th, 2010 (#701)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt November 5th, 2010:
You'll Be Dead Before Fed By the
The Flag of Revolution, Bloody Red, is Seen,
Sacred Colour for Victory is that of Green:
"Thinking Of All the Schemes of Mice and Men,
The Old Red Terror is Resurfacing Again,
A "Scientific" Dictatorship, "Equality for All",
Millions of "Alls" Buried Beneath this Sod Ball,
Camouflaged So Well We Don't Associate,
Control-Freak Reds who're Filled with Hate,
Infiltrating Over Decades, Now at the Top
Of All the Nations, Telling Us to Hop
To Their Dictates, Backed by Force
Of Law, which Committees Decide, Of Course,
Using the Technique of Bogus Science
To Strip Independence and Self-Reliance,
Giving "Interdependence", Sounds So Good,
Depending on U.N. to Dole Out Your Food,
Carbon Credit Experiments, Pavlovian Technique,
Punishment and Reward Will Make You Meek,
You'd Think the Reds Would Be Old and Toothless,
But Their Offspring's in Power, Cold and Ruthless"
© Alan Watt November 5th, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - November 5th, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on November the 5th, 2010. Now I always suggest, I get it over at the beginning, that newcomers should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and bookmark the other sites you'll see listed there. These are the official sites. They all carry the same audios and they all carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks I've given too, for print-up. And if you want print-ups in other languages, go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. And if you find sticking on the .com site, it's because too many folk go in at the same time, according to the big server, anyway. That's their excuse. So try these alternate sites if you find sticking on download, and hopefully you'll get a clean, quick download.
Now remember too, that you're the audience that bring me to you. I could be paid by advertisers, I have the offers, but I don't take them, because then it's kind of compromised. You can't say what you want to say sometimes if someone is paying your bread money. So, it's okay if others do it. Other hosts do that, it's fine. That's their living. That's their bread and butter. But for me, this is not a business, it's a necessity, and therefore I've got a free hand to do what I want. So you must help me with mine. The ads you hear on this show are paid by advertisers to RBN, then that gets the airtime up there. That pays for that. That pays for the broadcast and their staff and their equipment and their bills. So, help me out with mine. Buy the books and the discs and so on I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And they're different from the other books you'll ever read in your lives. I don't bother giving you long, boring detailed stories of repetition that's been copied from many, many books before, because that's all the historians do. It's his story, and he'll warp it a little bit each way, according to which parliament or government is in charge of things. They keep changing it anyway, even while we live, it's always getting changed. So, I show you a different technique of how they control us down through the ages from ancient times to the present. And I show you some of the coding they've used as well, and still do use on you all the time. A lot of the tricks they use on you, via the media. So, buy the books, and that will keep me going. From the US to Canada, you can purchase them with a personal check. You can use an international money postal money order from your post office. You can use PayPal to order or donate. If you want to order, send a separate email after your PayPal donation, with your name, address and order, and I'll get it out to you. Same across the rest of the world. You have the PayPal for ordering or donating. And don't forget too, I do appreciate donations, regardless of how small they are. And you can also use across the rest of the world, Western Union, which is kind of hefty for their fee that they charge. Money Gram is cheaper, and it's even cheaper still if you just get the Money Gram check, made out in Canadian dollars and post it. It will take a few days to get here, but it's a lot cheaper than any of them. And some people just send cash. It's up to you how you want to do it.
Hopefully that will keep me going, because it's a big expense here, and this is not a job, it's a full time, I can't call it anything. It's not a career. It's a full time necessity, really, and it takes its toll, believe you me, because there's not a day where you can take a day off for rest. It doesn't happen that way. You're in the middle of the most amazing takedown of the world that we've ever seen. It was planned by the same people that brought in Communism for the worldwide revolution, and the organization behind it, the financing behind it is incredible with the massive think tanks, foundations, all across the world, and they've successfully, basically corralled every country into it, and most folk don't even know it yet. But they're going to. They're going, when the food rationing comes in and the UN gets on its real high horse as it was intended to do, that big Communist organization, believe you me, there will be no complaints department at that particular organization when you're hungry. And they have no mercy whatsoever. Exactly like the Communist system, because it is the Communist system. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And I wasn't kidding at the beginning of this show when I said it's the same bunch, with the same agenda, and the goal is the whole world. They've pretty well accomplished it actually, through fifty years of treaties at the United Nations, and charters being signed which really, they eventually turn into treaties, and agreements, again, which are binding, as they call it, and they've tied the whole world together for the Great Society. Sometimes they call it the Big Society, sometimes the Great Society. And it's to do with total control in a Socialized fashion over every individual who is born and lives on the planet from birth to death. That's what it is. And the big Greenie departments and the Conservation departments and so on, they're all part of the Eugenics Depopulation Agenda under the United Nations. That's its purpose of it, actually. And the UN uses the same Communist tactics, naturally they will, because it was all Communists who went into it. In fact it was Communists who drafted up the charter for the United Nations, helped by some Canadian Communists too, along with Alger Hiss. And they wanted a world where they would distribute the food across the world.
And if you go into the Council on Foreign Relations website, or Chatham House for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, you can look on their own sites, you can see them, they've been working on the coming food shortages for the last fifteen, sixteen years now. You see, that's part of the agenda. You see, when this whole system comes in, and it's coming in all the time, through different phases, over your fuel bills and so on, carbon taxes, etc. They always do a massive purge. When the Russians came in, they killed off all the small farmers. They slaughtered them all. And they lied of course to begin with. They even told many folk to go off into the country, after the Revolution, and they'd give them land and so on. They started planting stuff and so on. And then they took it all from them and left them to starve. Same in the Ukraine. And when they were doing that, they were exporting the Ukraine's grain across the world, and watching them starve to death. Incredible documentaries, video shots of that stuff. And you think it was bad at Belsen and so on, it was nothing compared to the Ukraine, believe you me. Deliberate killing off of a people. And the same thing happened in other countries too, where the Communists took over. Same tactics, always, slaughter the people who had the small farms, then the state is in control of the farms.
In this upgraded amalgamation that came out at the Reece Commission, remember, back in the '50s, where they were told that the Soviet system would be blended with the Western system, very seamlessly, and integrated. Well, that's called public/private. And that's why your governments now are all powerful and every department they have really is a Socialist Department now. It doesn't matter what they call themselves, what party you think they are, the massive bureaucracy if you break it down is all to do with mass Socialism and organization of the masses, from everything that you need to survive. Water, food, everything. And rationing will come, because they always, as I say, have a mass purge, when they really see success coming. And they're heading towards starvation, basically. We'll have starvation in the future. I guarantee you it. And the big Agri-Food Businesses, which there are five of them. I think they're only one. I think it's the same shareholders that own them all, are public-private with the governments. They will be the masters of the food, via the United Nations, who will distribute the food. That's in their charter, by the way, if you go into the Department of Agriculture at the UN. They will eventually distribute the food across the world to your new region, as they call it, and then it will work its way all the way down to your local Commissars, and your Communitarian regions or local areas, and they'll give you your little handful of beans, or whatever you happen to get. And I'm not kidding about that. That is going to come. That's going to come. They always have massive deaths, always, when they take over. And we're sitting here playing away. Things are fine. Your internet comes up fine and your television switches on, and there's the same comedies, and blah, blah, blah, everything must be fine, and you don't know what's really happening. You don't care to know. Well, tough luck for those who don't care. I don't bother with them at all.
Now, I also said a while ago that at the Copenhagen meeting they had, with the various environmental groups, this massive, massive Communist organization or groupings under the United Nations of their Green groups. And they are part of that structure. They are definitely part of that structure with the same organizations, Communism, they cannot deviate from the Party Line, they must parrot what the top guy says, regardless of how ridiculous it sounds, even, or even how well it's contradicted by evidence, they will stick to that party line like an army, a parroting, robotic army, and of course, they do.
Now, I said at the time too, that eventually, we'll be taxed for everything. All your expendable money that was used to buy consumer goods, will go into taxes, fees, fines, and all the rest of it. You'll pay for the privilege of living, so that the big boys at the top of course can live for the privilege of being stinking rich and happy, and eating well. Exactly the same as the Soviet Union, by the way. Run by the same people I should say, too. Here's an article here.
UN told climate funding is 'feasible'
(Alan: See, it doesn't matter if their whole bogus theories are knocked down. As I said before, if God came down himself and said to his own people, he says, "Look, you can't do this. You're all wrong." Then, it wouldn't matter. They'd have to put a nuke out there and kill God or something, because they will not backtrack on their agendas which are chiseled in stone. So, it says:)
Money raised from banks, taxes, and carbon permit auctions could match the $100bn promised at Copenhagen, says report (A: This is for the UN.)
The UN chief Ban Ki-Moon (A: I like to say, he jumped over the moon) at a news conference in Bangkok.
A report presented to the UN chief Ban Ki-moon says it is 'challenging but feasible' to raise $100bn a year by 2020 for (A: Now here's what they've always used in Communism, to help the poor, you see. To help:) developing countries adapt to the effects of climate change. (A: You know, changes in the weather. Hot one day, cold the next. Stuff we've always had down through the last few millennia. You know. And it says:)
Seventeen finance ministers, leading economists and heads of state (A: Now, who are the heads of state? They aren't saying, eh?) say that it is "challenging but feasible" to raise $100bn (£62bn) a year by 2020 to allow poor countries to adapt to the effects of climate change and reduce emissions. (A: Now, that's a big lie, because they have already given permits to allow the so-called emerging poor countries to burn coal and everything else with no filters, etc. And, by the way, so can China. They signed that under the GATT Treaty, they'd be allowed to do it for twenty or forty years, if need be. It says:) If their findings, contained in a major report handed to the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, are politically acceptable, the chances of a new global climate agreement are substantially increased.
Money from banks, carbon taxes, carbon permit auctions (A: You better get this, seriously. Carbon permit auctions, because you're going to get your own personal one.) and new transport taxes (A: That's your cars and vehicles.) could raise the $100bn promised to developing countries at the Copenhagen summit last December, said the high-level advisory group which was chaired by the prime ministers of Norway and Ethiopia and included Lord Nicholas Stern, (A: We know all about Mr. Stern there, and who he actually really is, and what he's all for, and it's drastic depopulation, by the way, if you don't know. He'd have fitted in well at the beginning of the Bolshevik Revolution, in fact. He's got the right stuff. It says:) financier George Soros (A: Well, who else, but George Soros?), UK energy secretary, Chris Huhne, and South African, Indian and French politicians.
The authors suggested public money could be raised from carbon taxes ($30bn), possible aviation and shipping taxes ($10bn), (A: Well, you know it all comes down to you, the consumer at the bottom line, don't you. I hope you realize this. And it says:) the redirection of fossil fuel subsidies ($10bn), and by increasing the flows of money from multinational development banks such as the World Bank ($40bn). Private funding of between $30bn and $50bn could come from carbon offset markets and a further $100bn -$200bn could be generated from private sector flows. A possible "Tobin-type tax on all financial transactions was effectively ruled out by the high-level group which argued that it was complicated to implement because it would require global agreement.
(A: Well, they've never had problems getting global agreement before, have they? You know why? It's because, you see, these guys took over all your governments fifty years ago. That's why. It says here:)
"I do think it fits the bill. It's an agreed report and that is significant. A big chunk of the money, as much as $50bn, is public money," said Stern. "There was a lively discussion. You have some pretty strong people there, many of us have had direct responsibility for making public policy at a senior level. It's now for the political processes around the world to pick up. There is inertia in the international discussions, I hope this will help," he said.
Stern said that a higher price on carbon was needed.
(A: Now remember all this carbon has already been arranged through Gore and Lord Rothschild through the bank in Switzerland, where all the world's carbon money, all this gas of nothing, this big abstract nothing, will get funneled through and then it will get redistributed to where it's supposed to go, the UN and so on, after they take their big cut off the top. And we're allowing all this rubbish to happen. It says:)
Guaranteeing major new aid flows for developing countries has become a prerequisite for a new climate agreement, but many developing countries argue that the $100bn on offer from rich countries falls far short of the funding necessary to help 130 poor countries which face devastating climate change. Others want the money to be drawn wholly from public finance sources which they say is more predictable.
Public finance sources, eh? And what they really want is to fill their pockets in these countries, of course, because they have their own little dictators, who all belong to the right group, in charge of these little up-and-coming countries too. They're all in place. That's how it's done, folk. That's what organization happens to be. That's what they mean by it.
Now, I mentioned this article before, but it's written a little differently here. And it's from Australia, the Herald Sun, and it says here, Column:
Why you may soon need a warmist’s permission to eat
(A: That's one of these greenie warmists, you know, who, no matter if you're wearing a fur coat and you're freezing, it's still going to warm, because as I say you can't change it. It's written in stone. It says:)
SO you think I exaggerate when I say global warming is just the latest cause of the closet totalitarian?
Then pay close attention to an experiment the warmists are about to inflict on the people of Norfolk Island.
I've mentioned that before. They're the test subjects to be given their cards. Everything they buy and so on will be tallied up to see how much carbon they're using. And it's nonsense too. What they work out is, you're buying a toy duck, say, and how much energy it costs to make that toy duck is then transformed through some ridiculous mathematical equation, into the carbon that it would have cost to produce it. This is how they work out this big farce. This beautiful farce. It is beautiful. Only these guys could dream this, the same guys that dream up the bubbles in the stock market, for things that don't even exist, give you this. They run this. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I'm back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about an experiment that's being put out there on an island, off Australia, as far as we can see, as a test run, you see, for the rest of their country and the rest of the world, of course. They do this all the time. I remember, years ago, they used, I think it was Orillia in Ontario for the cashless society for a while, to see how it would work, and how they could track and trace everything you purchase and buy. And that's really what it was for, you know. Data, data, data collection. So the Communists can run you properly. How many beans you've got. How many so and sos you've got, and so on. Anyway, getting back to this article here, from the Herald Sun, and it says here:
Be warned. What’s being trialled there with $390,000 of Gillard Government money may, if it works, be spread to the mainland, say the researchers.
Which means it’s coming for you.
The plan - and, no, I’m not joking - is to put Norfolk Islanders on rations to fight both global warming and obesity. (A: Oh, let's tuck obesity in there too.)
Funded by the Australian Research Council, and approved by the Socialist Left Science Minister Kim Carr, researchers from the Southern Cross University will give each volunteer on the island a “carbon card”.
Every time they buy petrol, electricity or an air flight, they will have “carbon units” deducted from the fixed allowance on their card.
More units will be lost each time they buy fatty foods, (A: See, there you go.) or produce flown in from a long way away.
(A: Like, you know, more exotic foods, like, you know, meat or something. It says:)
If, at the end of each year or so, they have carbon units left over, they can sell them. If they’ve blown their allocation, they must buy more.
But each year, the number of carbon units in this market will be cut, causing their price to soar - and thus the price of extra food, power and petrol to rise - because the idea is to cut greenhouse gases and make Norfolk Islanders trim, taut and terrifically moral.
(A: See, you must get moral tuition too. It's bad, bad, eating meat and so on. Terrible. Terrible, meat eater. You carnivore, you. And all that kind of stuff, you see. And they've already trained the children about this stuff, already. They've trained them beforehand. They always go for the children, down through the ages. The Communists love this kind of technique, especially when they push it all through UNESCO, and all your national Teachers' Associations are federated with UNESCO to make sure they all get the same brainwashing for the children.)
Conservatives well aware of human fallibility will immediately spot the obvious flaw in this latest scheme of the Left to remake humanity.
(A: And that's what it is, to remake humanity. They've always got this idea of rebuilding all the flaws and eradicating the flaws in humans, making us good little robots.)
It’s this: what happens when people run out of their carbon rations, and can’t afford the extra units they need to buy more fuel, power or even food?
This is precisely what I put this week to Garry Egger, head of this experiment and professor of Lifestyle Medicine and Applied Health Promotion at SCU.
His response was astonishing and revealing, because this basic question - which so exposes the teeth of the totalitarian - would have been one you’d think he’d long wrestled with.
After all, his personal carbon trading idea is not new, so much does it appeal to the fingerwaggers and bullies infesting the global warming faith.
As far back as 2006, Britain’s then environmental minister, David Miliband, (A: You know, another guy whose family came running over to Britain, before WWII, and the rest of them were in Russia.) proposed a similar scheme, since endorsed by the Environment Agency and House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, which even insisted the Government defy howls of protest from mere voters. (A: So in other words, they were not to be swayed by what the people want. It's a mandate, right.)
“Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-condition for a personal carbon trading scheme; (A: That's what they said. This is Communism, folks.) "Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-condition for a personal carbon trading scheme; (A: So they're going to get it whether they like it or not.) The need to reduce emissions is simply too urgent,” the MPs (A: Members of Parliament) said, before being driven off to dinner. (A: Their big dinner, you know. It says:)
(Or as our own Professor Clive Hamilton, author and former Greens candidate, puts it, global warming is so “horrible” that leaders must look to “canvassing of emergency responses such as the suspension of democratic processes”.)
(A: Are you getting the picture here, folks? See, it's all been done already. It's all taken over. These characters were sent out from certain countries a long time ago to infiltrate, take over. And they're running your countries now, on both sides. It says:)
Nor is Egger’s idea new in Australia, The farcical “ideas summit” of prime minister Kevin Rudd’s 1000 “best and brightest” Australians also recommended it - which is a very good reason to be alert and alarmed.
“We have the technology now to create a ‘carbon account’ for individuals,” says the summit’s report, (A: And I said that at the very beginning. It's going to be down to the individual.) in between appeals for chairbound workers to be given 30 minutes a day of exercise and stairs to climb at work.
Yet although carbon rationing plans have been kicked around for years by the Left, that key question of the conservative has still not been answered. As in: what if people don’t want to live your dream? What if they rebel, or merely fail you?
Let’s go to the transcript of my interview with Egger on MTR 1377 this week, to see how he answered.
(A: This is how this guy answered it, this guy, who came up with it. He's asked this question.)
Me: What happens to those people who overdraw their carbon emissions ...
Egger: In the first year you are just warned ... (Later) if you overspend, you’ve got to buy the units that are cashed in ...
Me: If you put this in on the mainland and you were really strict about it - you really thought the world was warming very, very dangerously and someone exceeded their rations of these carbon units - one would presume that you would make food, for example, too expensive for them to buy.
Egger: That’s right ... so if you’ve got, for example, a very fatty unhealthy food that is imported from overseas which takes a lot of carbon to develop it, then the price would go up ...
I hope you're listening; for the hard of thinking, I'll repeat this when I come back from this break here.
Hi folks, we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And we're talking about the coming personal ration card and carbon card as well. You'll have a food ration card that will tie in with your ration, your carbon rations. I have no doubt whatsoever. So this is Mr. Egger, the big professor fellow who's introduced this far left Commie, really in Australia, thinks it's wonderful, as a good Socialist should, you know, and he says here:
Me: If you put this in on the mainland and you were really strict about it - you really thought the world was warming very, very dangerously and someone exceeded their rations of these carbon units - one would presume that you would make food, for example, too expensive for them to buy.
(A: And Egger, this Totalitarian, he sounds just like George Bernard Shaw, he says:)
Egger: That’s right ... so if you’ve got, for example, a very fatty unhealthy food that is imported from overseas (A: Now stop right there and think about that. Why should you have to import some fatty food from overseas? Huh? What's happening in your local areas? What's happening? You see, they're already at war with the farmers to eradicate your meat. They've told us that at the United Nations, already. So, I'll continue. It says:) which takes a lot of carbon to develop it, then the price would go up ...
(A: So they'll just price it out of existence. Then:)
Me: What happens to a very fat family, a very irresponsibly fat family, and they’ve blown their carbon budget to the scheissenhausen and you’ve made their food terribly expensive? What about the kids? They go to breakfast and they’ve got one baked bean?
(A: Well, this is Egger. Listen to the haughty answer here.)
Egger: In general you’ll find that in a very fat family they are low-income earners ... so those people would actually benefit from a scheme like this because the food that they buy, the energy that they use, they don’t use as much energy as the rich anyway ...
(A: There you go. There's your Commie answer.)
Me: But what happens? Their ration of carbon credits runs out and you’ve made food too expensive for them to buy. What happens to them?
Egger: Again, they get money back from doing the right thing.
(A: Like starving I guess is the right thing. This question:)
Me: No, but they’ve done the wrong thing. That’s why they are fat and poor. They’ve done the wrong thing, they’ve run out of their carbon credits. What are you going to do to them then, when the food’s too expensive to buy?
Egger: There are going to be personal cases like this that need to be worked out and they need to be worked out in the tax system as well as in the carbon credits system.
(A: Do you understand the massive bureaucracy that Socialists love, running you, that this is all going to cause? I'm sure it's already set up, actually. It says:)
Egger, founder of GutBusters, undoubtedly means to do good. (A: I don't know why, you know.) He has no wish to see children starve.
(A: I wouldn't count on that, if you want to go into this guy's psyche, I'm sure of it.)
YET I think we have here an insight into a key failing of so many grand schemes of the Left to improve resistant humans or build for them someone else’s idea of the perfect society.
These schemes so often are too perfect for the flawed humans they supposedly serve. But it’s the humans who must then adapt to the system, and not the other way around. Which is where some force is required; some democracy sacrificed.
(A: Remember too, that Communism in theory, under its charter, if you read it all, is another Utopia. Quite wonderful, really, it's just that it's not meant for humans to fit into and live in. That's the only flaw it has. That doesn't matter to the control freaks. Anyway, it says:)
What a buzz for the closet totalitarian then, to bully other people “for their own good” - in this case, to “save the planet”.
When the cause is so just, which planet-saver could let some contemptible fatty stand in their way, begging for the carbon credits to feed their chubby children?
On the other hand, which planet-saver would deny themselves any aid or comfort in this great struggle?
Need an illustration of what I’m talking about? Egger himself plans to jet off to Mexico (A: He's off in his jet, you see.) next month to boast to a United Nations global warming conference how he persuaded Norfolk Islanders to ration just such joy flights for themselves.
(A: So he's allowed to travel, but they're not going to travel. The test subjects are not traveling. He's traveling, yeah. Just like the Soviet Union. He says:)
This is your future coming right at you, folks. Best you realize it’s no longer a joke.
And it is no longer a joke. This was decided years ago. Nothing happens by chance. They don't just suddenly come out with this kind of stuff. They planned this forty, fifty years ago, including carbon taxes, as a good con game. Global warming, as a good con game. To bring down society and the population size, and you'll all be trained and put yourself in the hands of the experts. And that's what it's all, all about. And the big bankers are part of it because their boys helped design it, you see.
Now anyone who drops out of any cash money to this great wonderful Commissariat organization at the UN, is immediately kind of blacklisted. So here's what happened to Canada here.
Canada dropped to eighth place Thursday in a United Nations index that tries to measure quality of life in countries around the world.
(A: You get it if you're always dishing cash out to all their projects, like sterilizing women abroad, and stuff like that, and abortions. It says)
That follows Canada's fourth-place showing in the 2009 UN Human Development Index.
(A: UN Human Development Index. Sounds very Socialistic, doesn't it?)
Norway tops this year's quality-of-life list, as it has for much of the last decade.
Canada routinely led the list in the 1990s, when the UN first started compiling the index of living standards, giving prime ministers bragging rights about the country.
But development experts caution there is absolutely no statistical significance to shifts in the top 15 or 20 countries on the index, given their relative wealth. (A: What wealth? It's all crashed.)
"This year's eighth isn't comparable to last year's fourth, and down to first," David Morrison, executive secretary of the United Nations Capital Development Fund…
You see, all the big bankers are in there. But the bottom line is, you see, Canada is cutting their foreign aid, because we're broke, you see. And we've got this really silly great war to fight, you see, and protect the poppy fields over in Afghanistan. And that's costing a lot of cash already, you see. And they're already bad enough with their healthcare, cutting and slashing, just like Britain. And so, they've cut back on their overseas money to the UN, the big monster at the top. So they've been downgraded because of that. That's what they do, these spiteful little sods. Who wants their approval anyway? Do we really need it? I don't think so.
Now, there's a caller on the line. There's Tom from Wisconsin. Are you there Tom?
Tom: Yeah, Alan. I'm here. I called last night, and I'm becoming sort of a regular caller on your show, and it's because I think that you have a very focused and level-headed approach to understanding this control grid that's being built all around us. And my question to you last night, was, for me it was more focused on, what is going to keep the elite, once they have their Utopia future, you know, past 2050, with those that have been able to survive through the hell that they're planning for everybody. What is going to, what will keep them from destroying each other? And the reason I ask that is because, you know, I suppose it's possible that their religious orders will keep things structured as they pass through into the New Man, but I'm also wondering too, if perhaps, you know, as repeated through history, where elites have battled each other, for power and control, and I'm just wondering what in your opinion will stop them, or what system will prevent them from destroying each other?
Alan: Part of it is because they have a centralized organization of control of themselves. They're all in the same one big club. And it's much the same as the Soviet system, including the wealthy ones too, you know, the bankers and so on. And they do have a central, high committee to keep them all in check. Now, what could happen…
Tom: It would be like the Council of Three, Council of Six, Council of Twelve.
Alan: That's correct. And what you'll find too, is that, just like the Soviet system, they might go through a little spat amongst themselves like Stalin, when he started killing each other off, you know, different ones who had served him, etc. And even before Stalin, they were getting bumped off. They kept eradicating them out of the photographs, you'll notice, you'll look at the old Communist photographs, there's always another one missing every year, as they bumped each other off for the top positions. So, even amongst the same group, and even the same ethnic backgrounds, you even found that happened. However, they do believe, and it was Arthur C Clarke that tipped me on to that in one of his books, his last book, and it was to do with 3001, after they've got rid of all the cattle and all the small ones at the bottom and have their Utopia, and the elites come through. They'll actually be, as we're monitored with the internet for everything we do, they actually talked about using particular techniques which would measure their own brain patterns, brain thoughts, and prevent them from doing psychopathic things to each other. And I thought, I'll bet you that could be part of it. Now, they've already taken that into consideration with the Department of Defence's report for the next fifty years or so, where they said that the big mega-cities that will survive, after they've basically demolished all the rural areas, bunged the peasantry into the already overcrowded, old cities, and the elite will live in the top new cities, these brand new supercities that they've been building across the world. They might have the occasional war between the cities, he said, using high-tech weaponry, but they can't use a lot, because they'll be so well armed, they could destroy each other so easily, so they'll have to come to compromises. But I can see, personally, that they will try and go for this personal monitoring system that will stop the psychopaths from attacking each other. They've talked about it. They've actually talked about it, yeah.
Tom: And then I have just one follow-up question. Terminator 2, or Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, kind of hints at this future where machines will be sentient creatures that will run around kind of like with a Borg hive mentality of, you know, the mission is number one, you know, like that's the protocol. But then, what I'm wondering is, will the elite allow themselves to merge with the machines, or will they keep themselves separate, so they can't be taken over by the machines, I guess is what I'm wondering, as like a system.
Alan: They themselves, and it was Charles Galton Darwin, on the behalf of the elite, who wrote The Next Million Years, and that's quite the boast, of control. He said that we are in the middle of making a more sophisticated form of slavery, because we've always had a system of slavery in one form or another. He said, we shall put the masses into a form of slavery which they will not even know. Well, they're in slavery. He says, but we the elite mustn't alter ourselves genetically or by using the hormones, which they will use on the masses, by the way. We know that it's all through our food, it's all through your plastic and so on. He says, we shall not do this, he says, because we must retain our survival capabilities, but what we'll do to the masses, we'll destroy their survival capabilities, the governments will be making all their decisions for them. They won't need to make decisions. But we, the elite, must, we're the captains of planet earth and we must retain our vital facilities for survival. So they themselves will remain untouched. They already have life extension and stuff like that. And they'll get greater life extension, but for themselves, the main part is the brain. They don't want to alter their brain. They think they're the most superior part of evolution that the planet has ever seen, and therefore they have the right to rule us, but they mustn't change their brain. They have the psychopathic ability to be utterly ruthless when required. And they think that's a trait, a good trait to have. And they don't see psychopathy as we at the bottom see it at all. They see that as a natural proof of survival of the fittest in the Darwin theory.
Tom: Wow. So really, so all the modifications and all the changes in the progress that they talk about, that they propagandize us with.
Alan: Just like you always get promised a Utopia, and super strength, and part machine. And, oh, yeah, they might give you part machine and all, and be part cyborg to do a good job in the quarry, you know, so you can lift stuff. But, technically they also want to change you, because they've already said that man uses very little of his brain capacity. And they could by putting a chip in you, and this is a big part of their program, they could actually use your brain to run other computers, while you're mucking out a byre somewhere in a farm, and you wouldn't even know what you were doing. You would think you were walking around on the moon, having some wonderful escapade, like James Bond. And they could literally use you without your knowledge and make you think you're having a wonderful time somewhere in a palace, while, as I say, you're actually mucking out a byre.
Tom: So, literally, they could turn us into a Matrix, the movie set up, type of reality where we plug in and they feed off of us and use us, like a battery.
Alan: There's no doubt about it. Loyola, the Loyola International Science Conference they had, starting in the year 2000, and they've had one every year since, led off by Newt Gingrich. They had the top bioethicists in. The top guys in bioengineering, micro-biology, and they said they do have a chip, ready to go, that everyone will eventually get implanted with; our only problem is getting the public to accept it. And that will be done he said, through the culture industry. Through movies, through entertainment, through making the children want it. They'd pay novelists, as they've always done, to write it into novels and so on. Scriptwriters in Hollywood, yadda, yadda, ya. And make it an appealing thing to have. And, he says, but once they have it, there will be no such thing as individuality. This was their first meeting. And he said, think of it more like the beehive. You'll hear the sort of buzzing noises of thoughts of other people, going back to the central computers which will rule them and guide them. And then he said, think of it more like the beehive, but there would be no more individuality. In fact, he said, it would be impossible to even try to perceive of yourself as a distinct, separate individual.
Tom: Well, I can tell you this, Alan. They're going to have to kill me, before I'll let them modify me. So, I just want to thank you every single time, and I just want to thank you again, for all that you do, because for people like me, that gives me some hope that, not hope, but it gives me a way of working this out, so that I can come through in the end and maybe have a family.
Alan: That is your right. Never mind what they tell you. That is your right. You're born on this planet as a sovereign independent being, not as a slave to anybody who has some political philosophy or something like that. You have the right to choose what you want to do. And that's something that we have to start teaching these guys very quickly, because, believe you me, they know what they want to do, and they do believe they have the right to do it.
Tom: Well, they're not going to, they're not going to have their way with me. They're going to have to kill me first. So, thank you again, Alan. You have a nice night.
Alan: You too. And thanks for calling. And there's Stan from Saint Mary's. Are you there, Stan?
Stan: Hi, Alan.
Stan: How you doing, tonight?
Alan: I'm hanging in here. It was snowing earlier.
Stan: Yeah, how'd you make out with the tree falling down on the roof?
Alan: Oh, I had to saw all that up and everything. But I was just hoping that this year I'd evolve quickly, like that article I read last night, where they're blaming all these ridiculous theories for evolution in young girls' puberty, regardless of the amount of estrogen that's in all their food and baby food, and everything else, and I thought, my God, maybe this year, maybe my sense will tell me to involve into a hairy monster, and I'll be really warm all winter. I don't think it's going to happen, you know, but using the same theory I read last night, it should happen, you see. (Chuckle)
Stan: (Laughter) You know, it's interesting. I was listening to your last caller, and I hear this statement you made, and most people believe they're using 10% of their minds, you know, this small amount, and stuff. And I don't know if you've done any research on that, or have any idea where that came from.
Alan: It came out from early psychiatric meetings. Psychiatry was always Socialistic from its beginning, Darwinistic, because they tried to prove on the outset, that all mental illnesses were due to hereditary factors and genes. And that helped to make it possible for Hitler to kill a lot of the mentally ill. They claimed at the time that most folk only used 10% of their brain, and there's more to it than that, but hold on, and I'll come back with you after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And we've got Stan on the line. Are you still there, Stan?
Stan: I'm still here.
Alan: Yeah, where did you want to take that, was it to?
Stan: Well, I just bring that up as a simple point, because I use this as sort of a technique to get to some people, to wake them up a little bit. And, yeah I realize that it came from Sigmund Freud, and you know, that psychiatry and Freudian, and of course Freud was a fan of Darwinian, and it all works together. I think it was an explanation between consciousness and subconsciousness. Freud felt that, you know, 10% of consciousness.
Alan: And yet the man who broke away from them, and wrote his own books, who worked with Freud in fact, eventually said that it was all nonsense.
Stan: It was all nonsense. It is all nonsense.
Alan: He fell out with Freud, because Freud, being a good Communist, and it was big part of the world idea of the agenda, Freud wanted all his followers to go out there and tell the world that everything that happened in human nature was due to nothing more than sexual drive. And this guy said, no way, that's crazy.
Stan: Yeah, I refer to him as Sigmund Fraud.
Alan: Well, he was definitely a fraud, and if you follow his daughter and her personal, she became head of the world psychiatry, and she treated women and their children. Every single one of the children she treated committed suicide.
Stan: That's correct. And some of them even in Freud's own house, I believe.
Alan: That's right.
Stan: But you know, I'll talk to people, and a wide array of people and stuff like that, and say, particularly Christians and stuff like that, and I'll ask them if they've heard of that. You know, that they use 10% of their brain and what they think of that. And to somewhat they agree with that. And I ask them, well, why would God put you on this planet to use 10% of your brain. It doesn't particularly, it makes them start to think about things. So I look at things simplistically. And I wanted to make a comment on the two big movements that are going on in this world, with the Green Movement and this movement of One World Trade, shipping stuff over from China and around the world. Doesn't particularly go together does it?
Alan: No, it doesn't, but you've got to understand the history of the Green Movement, and it was first proposed by a great friend of Stalin, who happened to be I think the grandfather of Madeline Albright of America – the one who starved Iraq and said it was a good thing to starve them to death. And it's an ongoing agenda. It's an ongoing agenda that's very old. Don't fall for this that the Soviet Union was gone. We're in the World Soviet now. Absolutely. And they created the Green Party to go forward as a Green Party that would take care of nature, blend with the World Wildlife Fund and all the big bankers and so on, and get that, use that, and environmental policies to reduce the population, under any con guise they could dream up, global warming is a good one, or the coming Ice Age was another one, they've tried all kinds of things. In the '60s the same guys who are pushing Global Warming today were putting out books saying we're going to freeze to death, and I've read the articles here that they wrote. So, they're just following the party line, and this is the party line. It is a party we're talking about here.
Stan: Exactly. But getting you to drive a fuel efficient car that is shipped over from Japan or China doesn't particularly make sense.
Alan: No, it doesn't but remember too, under Agenda 21 at the United Nations, when you're put into your little community, which they're already doing in Britain, there will be essential vehicles on the road only. No private vehicles will be allowed. That's in the Millennium Project, Agenda 21: For a Sustainable Development. You've got to read it. It's all in there. That's why you won't be importing them down the road. Thanks for calling in. That's the music. I could go on and on about this, of course, but an hour is very short. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, Good Night, and may your God or your Gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
UN Agenda Pushes on With Global Carbon Taxes
You'll Need a Warmist's Permission to Eat
Canada Freezes Foreign Aid then is Dropped to 8th Place on UN Goodie-Two-Shoes Chart
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"