January 28, 2008 (#68)
"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
LIVE ON RBN
Title Copyright Alan Watt January 28, 2008:
UN'S IN THE MIDDLE,
NATO AND THE
WARSAW PACT ARE ONE"
© Alan Watt January 28, 2008
Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - January 28, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on
walk with your eyes open
But your lips they remain sealed
While the promises we made are broken
Beneath the truth we fear to reveal
Now I need to know now darlin'
I need to know what's goin' on so c'mon
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, and it's the 28th of January 2008. Newcomers I always ask to look into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as much of talks as you wish, because you'll find a lot of the pieces of the big jigsaw puzzle are interspersed in all different talks I've given over the years and also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can find transcripts in the various languages of Europe. You can download them, print them up and pass them around to your friends because the time is really getting short when this big war of the worlds, really "war on the world" is more appropriate, is speeding up because they see their goal in sight into the beautiful big scientific dictatorship that they've planned for so long and we've all grown through it.
Most of the things we think about, most of the topics we talk about, even the way we perceive life in general, our culture, our nations, the world, is all given to us. It's indoctrination through a scientific technique. In other words, if everyone else thinks it's normal you must be normal too. Yet they did the same trick a long time ago when they told them the earth was flat. Same technique only on a much grander scale, and as Bertrand Russell and others and Huxley and all the rest of the big boys said a long time ago, they'll do it by repetition. It's repeating the same lies over and over until we parrot the same slogans and we talk it into existence. It becomes reality. Must be true if everyone else says it too. Very, very simple technique.
When you go into Professor Carroll Quigley's books, "The Anglo-American Establishment" and also "Tragedy & Hope," he tells you – this was the official historian for the Council on Foreign Relations, which is the American branch of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, a parallel government that was set up a long time ago to get the big job done to the Great Work. Because democracy, as they knew, would take way too long with so much bickering going on with different competing factions and groups, so they had a parallel government set up under a massive, massive system, a super-structure of different parts or think tanks and so on working together on all the future problems which they foresaw and which they were ready to deal with before they even came up across the horizon. That's how they plan the future and Carroll Quigley talked about the Great Plan, how they'd bring it into being, and he said in his books – and remember, this is not just a professor. He was also an adviser to the State Department and to political advisers for many, many years. He was also the man who chose Rhodes Scholars for world government positions. He chose Bill Clinton and others. There's lots of bureaucrats at high-level federal positions across the world who are Rhode Scholars, all trained by the big world government system which started off in Oxford, England.
Quigley said, "we shall eventually merge capitalism and communism together," and he says, "we don't mind who we deal with, as the Royal Institute or the Council on Foreign Relations. We deal with dictators, tyrants, democracies, communists" and so on. He said, "because the greater plan was to eventually bring them all step-by-step into the same system and merge them," and what they've done through the great experimentation and that's what it is. You understand when American was created after the revolution they called it "The Great Experiment." It was a massive study that would be done on the populace. The Communist Revolution was called "The Second Great Experiment," the two systems. I think I hear music coming up so I'll be back after these messages.
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix and I was just mentioning how they did experiments of the different systems were eventually to be merged together. When I traveled across the world, I caught the old world because so much has changed since I went around it, I saw the different countries were doing big social experiments with their populations. Holland was one where they pretty well reversed roles and the men were encouraged to stay home – they were paid to stay home and look after the babies, and stuff like that, so I knew there was tremendous social engineering which was not by chance. Someone was taking data on this and we saw what was happening in the Soviet system as well because the Soviet people themselves are no different from anyone else across the world. They take whatever they're given as truth as well, their propaganda, their indoctrinations, and they believe in the system that's created for them, but they were also getting their particular system of security, which is now merged with the U.S.
If you've noticed, the heads of Soviet departments now are the heads of Homeland Security in the U.S. That's not by chance because even with the Ford Foundation when they were asked during the Reece Commission on foundations and all the power and influence they had and a book came out called "Foundations: Their Power and Influence" with the Reece Commission on what they were actually funding. The Ford CEO told, I think it was Chairman Norman Dodd, they told him our function is to merge comfortably and easily the Soviet system with America. This was all done under the auspices of the Royal Institute for International Affairs. It ran all sides of everything. That's why things are going the way they are today.
Now I just got a letter from a person I know who was brought up in the communist system and this is part of his letter here. It's amazing how synchronicities work because I was thinking this and in comes the letter, and he said:
"In the early '50's in communist East Europe they introduced the same personality profiling as is now being done in the West. Looks like there was good cooperation with the Royal Institute for International Affairs. At workplaces some colleagues were in charge of reporting on the others and that the personnel they kept files on each of us personnel offices. On the housing blocs they were the moles called entrusted agent of the bloc and abilities they were reporters of the moods."
Alan: In other words, how your personality was and it was going.
"So this system was truly international. We also saw chemtrails back in the '50's in Hungary and discussed them with schoolmates; we didn't know what they were."
Alan: Now that's true enough. They were testing out the same stuff they're doing today back in the '50's. I can remember asking my uncle at one point in Britain, who was in the RAF (Royal Air Force), what those big trails were in the sky, these figures of eight that lasted for hours and hours, and he couldn't answer either and he was in the Air Force. He'd never seen them before. They were testing out the chemicals they're now dumping on us today which are tranquilizing us, because you use tranquilizers when you want populations to go through massive, massive cultural changes.
To continue with his letter he says:
"When I went to primary school we had to hand in a written autobiography on our family briefly stating what our parents did before and after liberation. The communist teachers told us that national state will die away."
Alan: Now that's true. That's the theory and there will be no family. The children will be taken away from the mothers and become wards of the state. Now we know for a fact that the war on the family in the West was just as intense. They had more to overcome mainly through propaganda and working on both male and female, making them both dissatisfied, raising the status of single mothers and then the state comes in as a new father and raises the child basically on subsidies, daycare and so on. This same thing was written in 1861 in a theatrical play of the Hungarian writers that he mentioned at the top of the letter. It was also mentioned as well of course in Karl Marx's manifesto, although he didn't really write it up. This thing was planned not only in the 1920's but 150 years ago. If you go back to the days of Plato, "The Republic," which they all quote at the top, it was planned then too.
"They said in the 1950's the world system will be a scientific socialism. Today I see the same slogans reappear as the communists told us, we'll let communism come to the West known only by the central committee or aristocrats or " nature's nobility" as they said in the Harry Potter story. All the best."
Alan: That's standard. That's all factual. This is someone who's awake and can see the same system in control here. We also find too, of course, that Bertrand Russell who had the experimental schools in the West, given royal approval to start them up, where he did things that no other school could have done without going to prison (at least for the ones in the top). He was trying to destroy the family by encouraging all kinds of things including pre-pubertal sex with the intent that the more partners they have the very slim chance there would be of them bonding when they got older, and that's pretty well been accomplished in today's society, and it was to be intergenerational. They said it would take them three generations of steady indoctrination into the new system, free sex, all the rest of it, until casual sex would be the normal amongst children and it's all been successful.
I know they're going on a roll with all of this through television. It is the new normal. It truly is with all these supposed reality shows where they pick a bunch of Hollywood children and dress them up, put them in a big mansion and everybody's eyes are stuck on their little childish chatter where they have all these hormones and no brain. That's what the youngsters are taught to adopt, but because their parents are also degenerated through their indoctrinations, they let it go, and that's how it's been done. They could never have started this 30, 40, 50 years ago at this stage. They had to give us three generations because each generation, as it's being brought down, accepts more and more degeneration. Quite simple because these guys at the top work as I say in generations and even centuries. That's what foundations do.
Quigley himself said that foundations can accomplish their purpose because a foundation has tenets. They have a system built into it and they can recruit people that will work their entire lives with them, retire and pass on their knowledge to young recruits coming in. It could take generations to achieve their objective, but because they are well funded and have employees and pension plans and recruitment drives, they can actually pull off a goal, even if it takes them 1, 2, 300 years. Makes no difference, they can do it.
If you go into even Weishaupt's writings, he talked about the use of the great foundations that would be built up to master the world; so did Mr. Albert Pike. It's been successful and they go under charities even with the new chip, the MasoniCHIP they call it. All freemason lodges now and magazines are pushing the chipping of children "for their safety" and if you go into the histories written by the Quatuor Coronati Lodge in England, which is their premiere lodge for their own historical records, they'll tell you that they were the ones that gave us the standard education and the international system of education. They push for all these things and the useful idiots at the bottom do it willingly. They don't know what they're really doing – all part of the global agenda.
You know we live in quite a world. It's a macabre world of fantasy. More fantasy than reality and all you have to do is create a form of disassociation – you disassociate people from true reality and this is the technique that was well studied on the Far East and even Buddhism. Intense interest by scientists over 100 years ago went into the study of Buddhism especially because they found that disassociated techniques were used in the pupils or the students of Buddhism where they could walk through incredible scenes, even if it was slaughter, and not be affected because nothing to them really was real. They already found this out in some forms of ardent Hinduism, but they were also taught that nothing was real – everything was a thought or a mirror thought of Brahma, and so you could watch a whole tribe being slaughtered and it wouldn't affect you because it was all illusions and dreams basically. That's where we are almost today because on the West they decided to use entertainment. Massive, massive entertainment all working together through magazines, radio, television, movies, novels and so on, to create this disassociative state which we all live in today.
For most people, as they go through life, nothing is really real. That's why at the top they can tell them amazing things that are going to affect them personally, but they don't think it will affect them personally. "They must be talking about someone else, not me, I'm special. I live in my little cocoon here and I go home at night and I watch television and I zonk out and my favorite shows are always on, and as long as my favorite shows are on, the world must be just hunky-dory." It's as simple as that.
I saw this in the '70's and '80's in Britain, a time when the culmination of the deindustrialization process signed at the end of World War II by Britain's leaders into the United Nations and the U.S. agreement, because that was part of the signatory, they would actually de-industrialize the West, but mainly Britain. I saw it culminating in really the '60's, '70's and '80's with massive unemployment. Every day there was factories closing, year after year, week after week, and this was the normal. Suicide was higher in Britain than even Sweden (Sweden used to hold the records), and it was an apathetic feeling. I used to hate coming back to Britain to see what was happening to it. The welfare system was pushed to the maximum. The welfare offices themselves were all painted inside like battleship gray. It was admitted years later it was the most depressing color, a neutral type color, and that's why they all painted them this battleship gray. Massive psychology used even on the poor and the desperate.
I saw that. I saw people – I cut one guy down who hung himself on the same street because he lost his job. That was the "Great" Britain back then. Well, guess what? It's coming to you. It's coming to America. In fact, it's already here. We're being kept afloat artificially and they haven't given you a substitute to take over. I'll be back after the following messages.
Hi folks. Alan Watt back Cutting Through the Matrix and just giving a little bit of history of how everything that happened even in the '60's, '70's and '80's into the '90's was planned, the de-industrializing of most countries in Europe but mainly Britain. The massive fallout in society, it was terrible, divorces galore. Everybody starts divorcing when there's no money. The shame that everyone felt being on welfare, where they were treated like some sort of criminal, and yet that was encouraged.
Margaret Thatcher, the great Maggie Thatcher, the iron lady, she actually extended the opening times for bars because at that time there used to be a morning time, 10 till 1 or 2, and then open again later on in the evening, till about 11 at night. She extended it all day and the reason being she said it will keep the unemployed youth off the streets where they could be protesting or rioting. Everything was managed you see. As long as they gave them enough money for staying in the bars where things seemed less hopeless, then they wouldn't be causing any problems as we went through that change; and the same thing is to happen in the states. In the states they knew there would be much more trouble because of a different outlook on life. There's still memory at least of something that was supposed to be freedom and therefore for the last 20-odd years they've been building up a massive internal army and many factions of it and divisions of it to deal with all the strife that they see coming down the pike as they go through the massive changes. It's pretty well been implemented now and it's all been done under this utter rubbish of "it's for your safety."
When guys are walking around looking menacingly dressed in black like executioners (and that's why they chose the black color) with machine guns and asking you to bend over, that is not for your safety. In every other age that was called "despotism" and "tyranny" and "terror" and that's the object of terrorizing the public. That's what that is. That's not called "civilization," at least in my definition.
Now Valery Giscard D’Estaingwas the author of the European Constitution and this is a quote from him. Now listen carefully, those that are hard of thinking.
“Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly… All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way.”
Alan: That's the guy who authored the European Constitution. At least he was at the head of the committee that did it, Valery Giscard D’Estaing. I'll read it again because this is happening here too. This is the sort of arrogant boast they'll give once in a while knowing that most of the public have their minds off in some reality TV show.
"Public opinion will be led to adopt…"
Alan: Led to adopt. Public opinion will be led to adopt--
"…without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly… All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way.”
That was put through in the last constitution that had been thrown out by the people of Europe. That's how arrogant these characters are. They know they can just sit back, reword something, tuck it away in some massive new bill, pass it through and it's law. It's now legal. They have the legal rights to do whatever they wish, including killing you if need be. It's all quite legal.
It's not bad being a member of the tyrants club. There's nothing really that's illegal for you to do because you make sure that you write everything into law that you want to do. Now it is legal. That's what they've done in the U.S., Canada and across Europe and Scandinavia and across the world, this big international club that runs all the countries, that pass the same laws to give themselves the rights so that they're not accused of being criminals – the right to do whatever they wish with you. To spy on you, to listen in to all of your conversations, have access to all your data, because you must be predictable. You could be a terrorist and you don't even know it yet. You could be a secret Muslim or a potential Muslim and all that utter nonsense—utter rubbish and claptrap.
As I say, when you see men, goons, dressed in black with machine guns ordering you around, you better believe you're in big trouble. Now Hollywood has been churning out movie after movie after movie since the Pentagon started funding them with million and millions of dollars to put out exciting movies to deal with terrorism. They've had more terrorist acts on celluloid than they have had in reality, just like the propaganda movies they put in World War II. Hollywood put out so many war movies in World War II, they fired more blanks than real bullets that were fired in World War II; that's how bad it was. All these terrorist movies they're churning out now are always wrapped up in a good story to tell you and to condition you that there's the guys, there the goon squad, the guys that all look the same (just like the faceless soldiers in the Star Wars movies), running through the streets banging down doors. That's all quite natural because there's terrorists out there doing all sorts of things everyday on celluloid in studios in Hollywood, but no where else. That's how you change reality and the perception of reality.
Getting back to the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the coordinating system that was set up really at the beginning of the 1900's which emerged out of the Cecil Rhodes Foundation on behalf of British Royalty and I'll go into this in more depth after these messages.
Hi. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, trying to show you that nothing that happens, happens by chance. Conditioning takes a little while to work on the victims and they have all the time in the world because our whole lives we've brought up in a Pavlovian scientific system. So were our parents. They didn't know it either. They have less of a clue than we do because they were under it too and they also came through wars. They had World War II, Korea, Vietnam and the UN had their little wars all over the planet, as they still do, because the UN was set up to be the global army – to be the global dictatorship that would run the world eventually when they hand power, which they will do when the three main trading blocs are all united, the UN is meant to take over as the supreme council basically. That was its purpose. Read into the books of the founders of the United Nations. Read into the books that were put out especially during World War II in the U.S. by the big boys on the United Nations. They all worked towards it and their job was to write lots of propaganda to convince a post-war world why they must accept global government. They put out lots and lots of books on this subject and it didn't quite take so well, so they simply put it in a quieter mode for a while, while they worked steadily towards it, and they realized it probably take them another 50 years to get their agenda through.
They've been pretty successful so far because Europe is united against the wishes of its people, which shows you that true democracy really does exist—because it never existed at all and democracy is a con game. It always was and now it's the same thing with the North American Union. You have the Council on Foreign Relations admitting publicly on national television in countries like Canada that they drafted up the whole deals that are signed every year by the presidents and prime ministers of Mexico and Canada and the U.S. They signed the further integration since 2005. Every year they just go up there, they don't even read it, they just sign it because that's their job. They're front men and it becomes more integrated in such a way that it cannot be pulled apart. That's what they tell you. So many lawyers working on it would take them so many years to unravel. I don't see why, since any law that's put on the books can just be thrown out.
I've got a good wood stove here, it could probably go through quite a lot all at once. That's how you get rid of bad laws. Quite simple. You don't need lawyers to do it and we're integrating as I say through this Council on Foreign Relations, which is just the Royal Institute for International Affairs.
You'll notice too that when Bill Clinton had his little dalliances and played his little cigar trick blowing smoke rings, he didn't go in front of the American public right away to answer for his naughtiness. No. He was called up to the Council on Foreign Relations. He addressed them. Now they are a non-governmental organization, this powerful bunch.
How come he had to go and address them before he addressed anyone else, before he even addressed the people he's supposed to represent? Supposed to; again, the con game.
Well, you see he was going to the ones he represents because those guys are his peers and his bosses. The parallel government is alive and well and most people haven’t a clue of reality because pretty well all of their spare time is taken up by entertaining themselves through fiction. Downloading themselves through fiction, watching countless heroes win in battles against terrorism (which is just all over the place), all from Hollywood, and they're programmed. I mean it's impossible to shake most people out of it. They're gone so I try and address those who are awake, those who are trying to get awake, or, as they said in ages gone by, those who are trying to walk. You teach the lame to walk. You leave the dead to bury their dead. You can't lead people into a reality who don't want to come to it. It's impossible. Don't frustrate yourself. However, for those who are trying to understand, you help the blind to see and you help the lame to walk. You have to be very careful how you expend your energy and your time because the time truly is short now.
This is a battle for the entire planet. It's a battle for every human being on the planet because they intend to take us over completely and not just through propaganda and indoctrinations and inoculations and spraying and giving you food that makes you very sick. They also want to rebuild a better class of slaves, purpose-made slaves, the ideal design, the other meaning behind ID, Ideal design.
Now they're on a roll as they try and eradicate the last vestiges of what they call quaint old-fashioned cultures and they want to standardize the world, especially what's left of the Middle East where they still have families and they have a religion which they tend to go along with and a culture that's very old. They're probably the last bastion that holds out. They don't belong to the World Bank unless they get smashed into the ground and they're forced on to it and the debt system and then UNESCO moves in to inoculate everyone and train the first young bunch of youngsters in the schools to grow up to be good little democratic leaders or puppets. It depends how you view it.
Here's what they're going to do now and this is also a propaganda piece because otherwise it would not be released into the newspapers. This is from "The Guardian". It’s January 22nd, 2008.
"Pre-emptive Nuclear Strike a Key Option NATO Told."
Alan: Now remember, as I say, this is meant to terrify us, that's why it's released to the public, but it's also meant to terrorize all the other peoples across the world that haven't given in yet.
"The west must be ready to resort to a pre-emptive nuclear attack…"
Alan: That means you strike first. You kill first.
"…to try to halt the "imminent" spread…"
Alan: It says it's imminent, so there's a little adjective put in there to make you think it's --
"…an imminent spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, according to a radical manifesto…"
Alan: They love manifestos.
"…for a new NATO…"
Alan: A new NATO. Remember, NATO is a scrambled ATON, the old sun god from Egypt.
"…by five of the west's most senior military officers and strategists."
Alan: Look at the NATO logo and if you're very good at being able to see things in different ways, you'll see a little hidden swastika in there – a nouveau swastika.
"…Calling for root-and-branch reform of Nato and a new pact drawing the US, Nato and the European Union together…"
Alan: We're all getting pulled together now that we're all amalgamating.
"…in a "grand strategy"…"
Alan: They love grand and great because they have the great lodges and the Grand Work, the Great Work to fulfill.
"…to tackle the challenges of an increasingly brutal world…"
Alan: Increasingly brutal world. They should know since they're doing all the brutalizing.
"…the former armed forces chiefs from the US, Britain, Germany, France and the Netherlands insist that a "first strike" nuclear option remains an "indispensable instrument" since there is "simply no realistic prospect of a nuclear-free world"."
Alan: Oh my goodness!
"The manifesto has been written following discussions with active commanders and policymakers, many of whom are unable or unwilling to publicly air their views."
Alan: I could add being good little psychopaths that they are.
"It has been presented to the Pentagon in Washington and to Nato's secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, over the past 10 days. The proposals are likely to be discussed at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April. "The risk of further [nuclear] proliferation is imminent…"
Alan: That's around the corner you see. It's imminent.
"…and, with it, the danger that nuclear war fighting, albeit limited in scope, might become possible…"
Alan: Might become possible. Well, the sky might fall too. We might just fall out of orbit and all the rest of it. There's lots of possibilities.
"…the authors argued in the 150-page blueprint for urgent reform of western military strategy and structures. "The first use of nuclear weapons must remain in the quiver of escalation as the ultimate instrument to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction." The authors - General John Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff and Nato's ex-supreme commander in Europe, General Klaus Naumann, Germany's former top soldier and ex-chairman of Nato's military committee, General Henk van den Breemen, a former Dutch chief of staff, Admiral Jacques Lanxade, a former French chief of staff, and Lord Inge…"
Alan: Inge is a strange name, I-N-G-E.
"…field marshal and ex-chief of the general staff and the defence staff in the UK…"
Alan: In other words, the whole kit and caboodle of them.
"…paint an alarming picture of the threats and challenges confronting the west in the post-9/11 world on the ability to cope."
Alan: So they're going to bomb the hell out of everybody and that's their answer to it, but really, as I say, that's a propaganda piece to terrify all those who won't buckle under and conform into this standardization process of the new society for the world. That's really what it's for and also to convince all the people across the world, the people who believe all this rubbish, that we should be all frightened – frightened because there's just so many crazies out there running around with nukes and stuff. They're generally in military arsenals in your own country, so maybe the military should gid rid of them (their own weapons), since they hold all this stuff, all the weapons of mass destruction. If they're so worried about them, why don't they just get rid of them? But that will never happen, will it? because psychopaths never give away their tools of their trade and they never give away their cards either. That's a propaganda piece put into "The Guardian," which doesn't surprise me at all. Most of this stuff in the media is propaganda.
Now we've got Maggie from Texas on the line. Are you there, Maggie? Hello, Maggie.
Maggie: Yes. My question concerns TV, which you mentioned before. I noticed the exact moment when the TV dramas changed from a format of just generalized sales of sex and violence to very specific propaganda scripts, but what I noticed at the same time, and it surprised me, was that the vocabulary seemed to get very much more sophisticated and it seemed to be not only written by a different group of people, older, middle-aged even, but using vocabulary and blurring illusions, musical illusions and so on that almost would not be understood by most people educated who are under 40 now or 35 certainly. I just wondered if you have noticed the same thing and why you think they did that and to what audience you think they are appealing?
Alan: I think what it is too is that when you use "linguistic minimalism," and that's what Orwell called it, they have created a young society who have fewer words in use than any other previous generation, which makes it harder for them to express thoughts. However, they admire people who can.
Maggie: Do they?
Alan: They admire people who can put things over succinctly because it’s a trait they should have but it's not being taught to them. In fact, it's been discouraged. Therefore, when they put stuff out in dramas et cetera, especially when it's their hero figures on the dramas, the cops, the military, the anti-terrorist squads and all this stuff and all this fictional stuff, they will identify even more with these people because they admire them and so you're right. They have brought in more highly qualified scriptwriters and Hollywood is working hand-in-glove with the Pentagon on all of this stuff.
Maggie: Oh yes, that's very obvious. But I remember I knew a screenwriter or a scriptwriter about 10 years ago and she was talking about how you might make it in movies a little but you could never be a scriptwriter for TV unless you were under 30, preferably under 25, and that certainly went away overnight.
Alan: They did realize too that the skill wasn't there even in the very young. They thought that they could write even more immature scripts, keep them absorbed by getting young people in, but it really didn't wash over because it was just too familiar to the youngsters. There was nothing to really watch. It was just like their every day life, so they had to bring more intelligence into it to try and grab their attention and hold their attention while they get their indoctrination.
Maggie: Okay. Well thank you for your insights and I'm glad you've noticed what I've noticed.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Alan: Now we've got Ron from Michigan there. Are you there, Ron?
Ron: Hello, Alan. It's great to speak with you. You mentioned something a few weeks ago about their altering coffee and I was curious about that. I didn't hear you expound on that.
Alan: Yes. It was about 10 years ago in the Toronto Sun newspaper – it was also in the Toronto Star, so I guess it was in all the major newspapers at the time, it just mentioned – it was in actually the business section. That's all that was left in the restaurant so I just grabbed it and looked at it and it just mentioned the coffee purchasers had demanded from the growers that they change to the modified coffee shrub or they would not purchase their coffee, and it made no sense. I thought, well, obviously the producers weren't complaining that their yields were too low. It was nothing to do with costs or anything on behalf of the purchasers, but the purchasers were mandating that the producers change over to this genetically modified bean, and I realized then there was a different agenda behind it; and sure enough, coffee has changed big time since then. You see, if you want to alter people, and this was discussed at top levels, you go for the things they commonly use. If you notice, Monsanto went for the most common daily intakes in food, the types you take fairly well on average every day or every week. They went for those ones first, same thing for the coffee. If you want to alter people, dumb them down, even make them sick, you can use plants. Now plants are fantastic for producing drugs. Opium comes from a Poppy. Heroin comes from opium and they knew this in ancient times. You can alter people's moods and behaviors by altering simple plants to produce certain drugs or even acids or whatever.
That's why they brought top scientists and kept this secret from the public under law at the top that they were altering all of their food. They'd also altered the coffee because this was a must-be operation. They admitted in Canada that Monsanto had a secret deal with the Canadian government to experiment on the population of Canada for 10 years without our knowledge. Now during that whole time they were obviously taking the data from all hospitals, doctors, and so on, on the changes in the physiology and the state of health of the public. They had other things they were looking for, I'm sure, and we know the IQ has dropped. It’s officially dropped. We know that the body shape of the people in the West is incredible. It's just gone out of all proportions. It's altering all the time.
Ron: You can see it in their faces in the stores.
Alan: They've altered the coffee as well and I don't trust when they bring in top scientists that take different genes from different creatures and put it into coffee beans.
Ron: My goodness.
Alan: When there was no need for it in the first place.
Ron: No, no. The coffee I've seen in Mexico has been almost tree size, so I know that they do have shrubs.
Alan: Check back in the newspapers and find those articles. You'll be quite surprised. I'll be back after these messages. Hi. I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix and we have Keith from Florida. Are you there, Keith? Hello. Hello, Keith.
Keith: Hey, speaking of mindless juvenile propaganda, 2007 was the 50th anniversary of Atlas Shrugged. I don't know if you're aware of that.Ayn Rand, I got turned off to her years ago because reading her books is like walking in some sort of perverted 1950's military propaganda film written by a Barbie doll or something.
Alan: Her name was Alice, I don't know if it was [Morgantaller]. She was sent over to lead – many of them were ordinary people who thought she was standing up for individual liberty. What they didn't realize was she was standing up reiterating and voicing on behalf of the people like Rothschild that was her lover. She was actually putting out their right, what they believed, for those who were superior to rule the majority underneath them and that the laws that they had for the public did not affect them. She thought that genius had the right to rule those that were rather silly or stupid according to her and she was quite the woman for this. She was a eugenicist, no doubt about it.
Keith: She put together this bizarre collective which Alan Greenspan was a member and she and a few others put together a collection of ethical essays under objectivist philosophy called "The Virtue of Selfishness" and really it's just a lot of nonsense. Recenty I stumbled on an old clip of her on the Phil Donahue show and I tell you, even in her late age, she was very mean spirited and some of the stuff that she said was just absolutely outrageous. It's amazing to this day that people are so beguiled by this person.
Alan: They fall for it. Again, there's always two ways of looking at something and the majority of the public that followed her were really the lower middle class thinking she was standing up for individuality; but for those from the elites' point of view, she was actually pushing what their beliefs were. She was the mistress of Rothschild and others at the top and she believed in their right, the geniuses right to rule the lesser.
Keith: I mean her English was pretty amazing for being raised in the old Russia.
Alan: She was raised exactly for her purpose, believe me.
Keith: I believe that. I mean all propaganda, Hollywood, top diva, stuff like that. Anyway, I just wanted to hear anything new.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Keith: Thank you Alan. Have a good afternoon.
Alan: Don from Canada. Are you there, Don? Hello Don?
Don: Yes. Can you hear me?
Alan: Yes, go ahead.
Don: Just to touch on a couple of things here. You were talking about coffee earlier and the fact that I can't believe how many people drink this Tim Horton's coffee that's based all up here. I see everybody, everybody carrying around a cup and I've never seen this until like just recently like after big events on 9/11 or whatever. Everybody drinks that coffee and I can't stand it. I mean I've gone organic so I can't really vouch for that coffee because I tasted once and it tasted like swill, but that's just me. I mean just to say that they're putting something in that coffee. They say that they haven't, but I know that they do. I just have that feeling.
Alan: The main purchasers have the clout. They buy the beans on wholesale and yet why would they demand they all change to these particular modified beans?
Don: Oh exactly.
Alan: That's why I don't trust them.
Don: I don't trust them either. Another thing I just wanted to say--
Alan: We're cutting off and that's the end of the show. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your god or your gods go with you.
(Transcribed by Linda)