Oct. 11, 2010 (#682)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Oct. 11, 2010:
It's the Knowing and Waiting:
Fabian Global Economy,
"Each Move Alone Seems Incidental,
As the Fabian Technique is Incremental,
It Takes the Overall Plan to Know
Where Separate Announcements Intend to Go,
From Expectations We Must Recede,
Global Economy Dictates Each Need,
Global Suffering Shared in Tearful Pool,
Except for the Bigwigs, Those Who Rule,
Centuries of Collusion with Rich and Parties,
Playing Dialectic, The Leaders, Smarties,
Fooling the People, Sure to Follow,
Responding to Prompting of Phrases Hollow,
Party Paths Converge for Those Who're Mobile,
Destination Equal Poverty Now We're Global"
© Alan Watt Oct. 11, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Oct. 11, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on October 11, 2010. I always start the show off by advising you to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, and I tell you that you the listener bring me to you. Look at the items I have for sale and please buy them because that’s what keeps me going. I don’t take money from advertisers and the money that comes in is simply from you, the ones that listen, to keep me going… and hopefully you will keep listening in. We are definitely on a roll towards a new world order. Even though the news is very, very quiet there are big things happening, obviously, and world meetings going on. The IMF is really coming to the fore. That kind of stuff happens, but meanwhile the media itself is giving us basic trivia and a lot of recycled news… lots of recycled news; stuff that’s been said over and over and over when nothing much happens. So if you want to look into all the audios I’ve given in the past, go into my web sites and you will find hundreds of them there, peruse them at your heart’s content. Listen to them. You don’t have to agree with everything that I say but you can definitely check up what I do say. Hopefully that will put you on the way to some kind of understanding of this big, complicated CON GAME we call reality and give you some sort of idea of how to handle it in your own way. Because that’s all it boils down to, is how will you handle the big changes, how have you handled the big changes, did you even know they were happening, or were you simply adapting along with everyone else? Remember, [order and donation options listed above]. So that’s my rushed entry tonight because we are big late getting on for some reason.
As I say, this new world order is not really new. It’s been on the go, long before you were born. There have been other world orders in history. Even the feudal system was a world order. The dominant church was a world order. And before Christianity there were world orders too, under empires basically using the same techniques and always having what Huxley called the dominant minority to rule over the public, and with the dominant money boys to finance those big empires as well, and tax the people too; they still do today. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. That guitar just wails and that’s often how you feel when you live through this big system which really you have no control over. It has control over YOU – it always did – and your parents and grandparents and those into the distant past even.
As far back as the 1700s there were lots of books written around revolutionary times when they talked about the kind of system they’d like to bring in. You had different levels of authors in those days; some of them simply worked for the revolution, promoting the revolution, and others went into the more philosophical parts of it and what kind of society they hoped to bring out of it. It’s amazing when you look at even the writings coming out of France especially, from some of the big authors there, when they talked about this system which really resembled communism in all of its ways in fact, including some of the techniques it also used. In fact, a lot of the techniques of killing off an elite and an intelligentsia class, to take over, by mass slaughter, was copied in fact by the Bolsheviks when they got into power. You have to go into the commune of France as well to see what happened there and what they were proposing to do; again, a communistic society. It wasn’t just peasants, believe you me; it wasn’t just a peasants’ revolt. It was most of the elite at the top, I mean the real elite, were on board with it, especially the moneybags.
Today we are going into the whole changing of society. Aldous Huxley talked about this when he talked about the ‘scientific’ side of things. That’s really what they were all aiming towards, the eradication of all religions, which kept people in bondage they claimed, or superstition – the term they love to use even today – and replace it with SCIENCE. Science, supposedly, being beyond refute and exact and truthful. Of course science has been used, as we know, for many bogus theories right up to the present time of global warming. So it’s anything but the be-all and end-all of truth. It’s used for political purposes, as always things are of course; things will always end up being used for political purposes.
So many people wrote about the same things at the same time in the 20th century too. Huxley himself, and Bertrand Russell, talked about science and a scientific revolution. Russell went as far as to say that if there was to be a dictatorial society, a tyrannical society, he’d rather have it be a scientific tyranny than any other kind of tyranny. Of course he himself, and his offspring, or his descendants I’m sure, would benefit from that. They would go on through it without being slaughtered like those below, and sterilized and all the rest of it.
Charles Darwin was all part of this too. It’s amazing how Darwin and Marx and all these characters came out at the same time to promote this new society, when they were at the height of the Industrial Revolution. They were producing amazing things mechanically. The steam engine of course was being improved all the time. The weapons and armaments industry was going like you would not believe. They even had international arms trading shows, expos, in different countries to show off the latest big Howitzer Guns, all that type of thing. They thought that this is a time for would-be tyrants to get in on the act because they saw this power that was coming up, through science, and they knew they could use this to conquer whole nations very quickly and even reduce the planet to rubble if they wanted to. Tremendous heady power… very, very heady power for those who wanted to get up into areas of rulership.
And with them came, of course, the philosophies of who should be the totalitarian ruler. Should it be a sort of Nazi, socialist, national socialist type philosophy, advocating a superior species being bred out of the existing higher-ups of the Arian race, or should it be scientifically designed where the best genes were kept out of every people to be used and put together in individuals who would end up being geniuses for the communist side? So really when you boil it down they were all on this… they would take you back to the same ending. The paths would always meet at the end, with right, left, and everything else. Don’t think that Capitalist Society as they called it, was any different. They used combinations of both Fascism and Communism. In fact, they supported the communist party and helped feed them for 50-60-70 years, all through the Soviet era.
The big banking elite, the big aristocracy, realized that an obedient society had always been their problem, and with a scientific society they could make that happen; they could bring it in. They would use the dialectic process to get it going. Countries would have to give up all their sovereignty and come together under a global world system of control, total control where it wouldn’t just give you jobs and so on, it would decide who would get born and who would not get born, according to your gene types and any possible inferior genes would determine if you even got born. In fact it would determine if two people could even mate together. They foresaw the time, like Huxley did himself, when engineers would basically use artificial inception and so on and gene removal, gene enhancement – take some out, add some others – to create the perfect society. This was all happening from the 1800s even right through the 1900s and the 20th century. This amazing goal – for a lot of stuff they supposedly hadn’t even discovered at that time – that has always astounded me. They didn’t find the gene until much later, but they always called it the gene, and they just knew they were on those chromosomes. So they have known about this long before the public were told in the history books of what was being discovered. They were WAY ahead of anything the public were ever told.
You cannot make predictions on things that you are hoping for… and put all your plans into motion, banking and counting on that. You have to know that you’ve actually found these things, that you can do what you want to do. All you have to do is create the right circumstances and get the public to accept it. How do you do that? Well, you bring in the Bernays guys, the PR companies, the marketing companies. You create massive feminist movements, until women really don’t need guys, except maybe to have a child, and even that you can do with bypassing the father all together now. Simply send an egg off somewhere and pick the type of male that you want it fertilized by, and even pick a woman to carry it for you and that way you save your nice figure. That’s all happening and has been for quite a few years now.
So technically we are in a form or Brave New World, where all old values go out the window. It’s like Nietzsche said, when he said, God is dead. He said, how would you behave in a world where God is dead? Meaning morality-wise, your values and morality and so on, your whole world outlook, how would you behave and see it all if there was no God? And suddenly by some reason you could actually know that for a fact, how would your world view be then? In other words you’d be wide open to become Gods, those who wanted to, and therefore you had all the superman type characters coming out of National Socialism. Before Hitler did, it started in London and you find the founders of the Fabian Society for instance, talked about the creation of superman. George Bernard Shaw wrote a short story, Man and Superman, and how the old type would NOT be allowed – those who were unable to adapt into new technologies – they would not be allowed to come in to the new type, because according to Darwin they would hold back and destroy those who are fit to come through. That was the same ideology that Hitler used, and the same ideology, by the way, as the Soviets used, because Hitler learned everything from the Soviets on how to mass kill. They had been at it a lot longer and they also wanted to create the Soviet Man. They called it the new Soviet Man, a new creature. With the help of Pavlov, indoctrination and of course genetic tinkering and tampering, they believed they could create this kind of creature for what they called world peace.
There are many ways of bringing world peace. Arthur Koestler (and others) talked about it in his book, Ghost in the Machine, and how different branches working under the United Nations were trying all kinds of chemical, physical lobotomies to try to find ways to kill off that part of the brain that makes you independent. The UN had declared that independence, the INDIVIDUAL, individuality, was their main enemy and the enemy of man. Therefore they would have to basically do something to alter man himself, BUT not the elite; the elite have to retain their wild capabilities, as Charles Galton Darwin said in the 1950s, because they would be guiding the world and would have to have all their self-preservation faculties working. But the public wouldn’t need it, he said, because the state would be making all their decisions for them.
Most folk think of the state as a system where government simply comes out in an authoritarian way and speaks down to you, kind of like the BBC did for decades actually. The same as Radio Moscow used to do; they just give you announcements, from the top down. The different Ministries have decided this and different Ministries have decided that… that’s all you heard one after another. Now they have their Public Relations department to make it softer and to tell you lies in a more entertaining fashion. What we fail to realize is this agenda is going on full-steam ahead… full-steam ahead. There is an article for instance - I haven’t got it here – where the greatest breakthrough for infertile women, now that SO many women are infertile, they can get transplants of a womb. I guess they’ll put it in temporarily until you have the child, but because of the rejection problems and the costs of it all, on various kinds of cortisones and anti-rejection drugs, then they can remove it after the baby is born. And of course women do champion science, as their new God actually, the one that gives you the total body makeover, according to Oprah Winfrey and all the gurus that are put out there for women to follow. We’ll see where it goes with that. It’s just amazing how they adapt first, but then women do adapt quickly, as they know at the top. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Here is a quote by Aldous Huxley from his 1962 speech at Berkeley and I have the link to the whole talk on my site in the archives section, but you’ll find it elsewhere on the net. He says here,
It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution (Alan: It’s the ultimate revolution…) with which we are now faced is precisely this. That we are in the process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy, who have always existed and presumably will always exist, to get people to love their servitude. (A: …to love their servitude.)
You know, we get up and angry about that but you know, when you read Charles Galton Darwin he also says that there have always been systems of slavery; it’s always existed. He said in his book The Next Million Years, we are now in the process of creating a more sophisticated form of slavery. Sophisticated, meaning that you wouldn’t really realize that you were a slave – even though you’re a wage slave, paying it all back in taxes, as they spread the wealth supposedly. Redistribute the wealth across the planet as they are doing right now, after the worst crash we’ve ever had. That’s what they’re doing with your tax money but they can’t help you at home because you’re global now, you see. You’re part of the ultimate revolution. They are going all the way, including bioengineering human beings and they have been bioengineering us for a long time. You can see the effects around you, if you walk into town. On the young men and the young women, you’ll see the effects there. It’s actually there; it’s very obvious.
Then of course they have the ones to play on the mind by different techniques. Dr. Jose M R Delgado who was Director or Neuropsychiatry at Yale University Medical School, Congressional record number 26, Volume 118, February 28, 1974 said this… We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. That ties in with what they were talking about, with Arthur Koestler and his book, The Ghost in the Machine.
"We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, (A: And that’s how we do live. We live and think, you know, we don’t want to die; it is you; you are the only you there is. But we think that we are important enough to keep on living; at least hopefully to yourself or to others.) but this is only his personal point of view. . . Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. . . . (A: That’s why they are using all these techniques in school today for groupthink.) We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electronic stimulation of the brain."
- Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974.
He also talked about the whole population getting it. Well, tie that in with the writings of Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages, in the chapter The Technotronic Era, and you will be quite amazed at what he was talking about there, techniques of bathing whole continents in particular electronic waves that could pacify the people and make them very placid. Now, they never talk about things unless they have already tested them out, and they have tested this stuff out on the populations, large populations. Then they have the study, the crime reports come in; is it up or is it down and so on and so on. Mind you, they can also make you very aggressive with these techniques as well. They have done that too, to study the effects of violence, as they go up or down or what, what happens. So what they are talking about actually does work.
Now we are under the total surveillance society as well, under the comic guise I should say, the tragic comedy guise of terrorism, which is beautiful for ramming everything through since obviously everyone is a potential terrorist; they just don’t know it yet. But given the right circumstances they might turn into one, that’s what they mean by it. That’s what they mean by it. Remember too, what Kissinger said about the definition of a terrorist, when he was asked at a European meeting what he meant by terrorism, what was a terrorist? He said, anyone or groups of people who are against the new world order, the new globalist society.
Since we are at this stage of the game and no one mumbles much about it… we don’t mumble much because they have never, ever had… they’ve never been given so much entertainment as they have today. Never in history has so much entertainment been given to the public, through electronic gadgets that are cheap enough for most folk to buy. They can just pass their time staring at their little screens or texting their friends and all that kind of stuff, and chasing rainbows, and going from one guru to the next, to find out the meaning of life. But never, ever have they had this kind of technique used before. Who would have thought that basically entertainment, games and movies, and texting people would occupy most of the people’s free time, including the youngsters too, while everything that everyone fought for in the past is being taken away from them? And they still think, because they still think that they ARE important, like Delgado said. He says, most people think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his own person point of view. Most folk do live in that; it’s a natural state to be. You think, I must be important; I’ve got to keep feeding myself; I’ve got to live. It’s an imperative to live so you think you have that to go by. But no. These guys have decided otherwise. If you are to live at all it’s only because they are going to suffer you in the meantime, and use you and tax you and send you off for wars, to finish off the rest of the world global system. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just going over, recapping basically, stuff I’ve gone over before. But if you don’t remember the basics you won’t remember anything else, as you are flooded daily with bits and bytes of news and lots of data. Just data, data, data, most of which you’ll forget because there is just too much data to remember. That’s also part of the internet. They knew, at the time, at the top, that they could overcome most people’s reluctance to go along with the changes in the world. Even when they start their blogs up, their chat rooms, in fact they set up a lot of forums for them to join but they put their provocateurs in there as well from the beginning. They could also over-flood people with data until their brains kind of shut down and everything would become a kind of fantasy to them, much like the mainstream media has become a fantasy to most people when it’s interspersed with Hollywood and the bimbos and all that kind of stuff. It’s not real news anymore at all. You cannot mix it all with entertainment and call it news.
We have all these games played on us. It’s only important really to remember the basic stuff as we go through the big changes which have been planned. Remember too, that big international institutions – they like to call the foundations ‘institutions’, something that goes along with government but is not government, for which government depends, and you find the big institutions as they like to call themselves, private companies, work hand-in-glove with governments. What politician that you know of could walk into a position and get appointed as, say, the health high chutzpah, for the country, when they know nothing about health? Or they get put in charge of energy, where they were a real estate lawyer before that, or something like that? It’s because they depend on the bureaucrats and so on, and the bureaucrats depend on the handouts on all these different areas from the marketers who work for the institutions themselves.
So technically government is run through a couple of ways and the most common one is to do it through the handouts, the marketers. The RAND Corporation for instance, is listed as a private nongovernmental organization, a charitable organization… that runs the military and everything else. [Alan laughing.] Of course, that’s the parallel government. A parallel government runs the other governments, and the other governments at the top know it. They are darned well aware of it… ALL OF THEM. There hasn’t been a prime minister elected or a president elected since 1946 who did not know what was going on and what was planned for the world, because they all signed at the meeting in San Francisco onto the United Nations, and they all had to sign that they would give up parts of their sovereignty, a bit at a time.
We are on a rush now, and Stephen Harper of Canada, when he was at the G20 meeting, you will see a little clip on YouTube – I’ll put the link up for you. [Stephen Harper, "I know some people don't like it. It is a loss of national sovereignty] It’s only about 20 seconds but he does mention that a lot of people don’t like what’s happening because we have to give up some of our sovereignty for the NEW GLOBAL ECONOMY. Now, people think, what is the new global economy? It’s an economy where the World Trade Organization, the ones that brought us the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs and made various other Star Chamber organizations, that they are bringing us into a new system along with the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, another private company, under the United Nations umbrella, under The World Bank umbrella as well, again, private organization made up of international private money lenders. That’s what runs the world and they are bringing this all in. They want to restructure the world. They want the right to run every country’s economy, finances, all their bookkeeping, everything. That’s what they want to do. That’s what it was SET UP to do. And those who set it up, the IMF for instance, talked about it at the time. John Maynard Keynes talked about it, the second part would come after he was dead. Well that’s now… as it rises up to its glorious position, as they would say. So here is an article…
Financial regulators planning worldwide rules for large firms
By Howard Schneider - Washington Post Staff Writer / washingtonpost.com / October 10, 2010
International bank regulators are planning a fresh wave of rules for the world's most important financial companies in an effort to ensure that firms considered "too big to fail" are better protected from collapse - and that taxpayers are insulated from the fallout if they do. (A: Well, that last part will never happen.)
The new regulations could include demands that such firms - referred to by regulators as "systemically important financial institutions" - keep more capital on hand than other banks and companies, draft detailed "living wills" to outline how they could be eased into bankruptcy without damaging the larger economy, and be subject to more intense government supervision.
While many of the details are still to be worked out, the head of the effort said a general set of 16 recommendations will be presented at a gathering of world leaders next month in Seoul. (A: You notice all these things that happen in the world today, happen outside our countries? In some far-off place that we can’t go and just go in and listen to what they are doing? That’s all intentional too of course.)
The companies in question "are very big and powerful," said Mario Draghi, head of the central bank of Italy and chairman of the Financial Stability Board, the international panel working on the new regulations. "There needs to be supervision at the global level. You need supervision up to the challenge." (A: And so on and so on.)
The aim, Draghi said, is to create a system where it is less likely for globally important firms to get into trouble. (A: Well that means they are going to be more covered than ever probably, by the taxpayer. Because the big bankers rule the world, and rule this oversight, Financial Stability Board too I’m sure. Who appointed these guys into this position, of this private agency?)
It doesn’t really concern the general public because they go on. They have been dumbed down. They have lived through a war on their mind and they don’t even know it. They have been conditioned from schooling with scientific indoctrination; they don’t know that either. And most people are really just wrapped up in television, and having fun, and hopefully they can carry on with that forever; that’s what they wish. When you ask many of them, who do understand a little bit, they’ll say, well, the worst will come after I’m dead. I can live and be happy in my lifetime. They don’t care what the next generation is landed with.
Then of course, the IMF gets into the act as well. This was an article they actually published in 2009…
IMF warns over parallels to Great Depression
(A: That was to get the world ready to demand that they come up to their full power, as they were intended to be, running the whole world’s economy.)
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor / telegraph.co.uk / 16 Apr 2009
I’ll put this link up as well to let you know that we are living through a pantomime, where they release these articles AT the right time, at the right time in concert with other articles that are similar, to make you think that it’s all so imperative that they have their way. Not that we can do much to stop them because all of your politician are on board with them; they do what they are told.
We also get the articles which are farcical because they always want you to think that governments just are so shoddy that they slip up and make incredible, farcical payments to people who either don’t exist or are dead and stuff like that. Britain is famous for that, like they just keep screwing up. But they are not. They are not screwing up at all. They are not stupid either. There is always another reason why money goes missing, or it’s put out to people who are dead for instance. Here is the US as well…
72,000 stimulus payments went to dead people
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER - Associated Press Writer / ap.org / Oct 7
(A: So that gives folk at the bottom a bit of chatter amongst themselves… did you hear that dead folk got all the stimulus package? It says…)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- More than 89,000 stimulus payments of $250 each went to people who were either dead or in prison, a government investigator says in a new report.
The payments, which were part of last year's massive economic recovery package, were meant to increase consumer spending to help stimulate the economy.
But about $18 million went to nearly 72,000 people who were dead, according to the report by the Social Security Administration's inspector general. (A: They have everybody’s data, day by day. They know when you die. It’s instant. It’s instant retrieval. They don’t make mistakes. So where did that money really go? We will never, ever, ever know.)
An additional $4.3 million went to more than 17,000 prison inmates, the report said. Most of the inmates, it turns out, were eligible to get the payments because they were newly incarcerated and had been receiving Social Security before they were locked up.
In all, the $250 payments were sent to about 52 million people who receive either Social Security or Supplemental Security Income, at a cost of about $13 billion.
Now, again, that’s also meant to make people angry about those who are at the bottom of the ladder. Have you all forgotten how much we all have paid out, and will be paying for the next 10 generations, to the banks to bail THEM out? …with cash gifts? Because the biggest welfare, the biggest welfare goes to the corporations, the big corporations, and the big military boys. In Canada too, we’ve got companies here that supply the military with their big machines and weapons and so on. And every so often, every 4 or 5 years they talk about, oh, we are failing, we’re failing; we’ll have to lay off thousands of people… and they get cash grants from the government. GRANTS. That’s not a loan. That’s a grant; it’s a gift. But no, they turn it off on this kind of thing, on those at the bottom. Really, when the money gets paid out to all these dead people, 72,000 dead people, that money really was slated for something else; that’s what really happened with that.
James Delingpole from the Telegraph has written quite a lot of articles about the con of global warming and the climate change stuff and so on. He says here…
US physics professor: 'Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life'
By James Delingpole Politics / October 9th, 2010 / telegraph.co.uk
(A: This was a rehash of something that came out before but he put it out again because it’s so important and pertinent to what’s happening.)
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.
Anthony Watts describes it thus:
This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science.
It’s so utterly damning that I’m going to run it in full without further comment. (H/T GWPF, Richard Brearley).
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?
How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’ętre of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. (A: They all live on grants, you see.) For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.
It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:
1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate.
2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, (A: That’s interesting…to all world governments…) as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.
3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work. (A: And that’s true.)
4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. (A: See how a tight shop it is? It’s a must-be, you see. Nothing is to change this, no matter what happens. Even a deep freeze isn’t going to change it. I’ll put these links up for you to read in full on my web sites at the end of the show. I’ll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and just to finish off something in the same vein that’s come out from New Zealand.
Legal Defeat for Global Warming in Kiwigate Scandal
Oct 6, 2010 John O'Sullivan / suite101.com
(A: It verifies what Delingpole said last week when he said that the new findings that are coming out, and from the Bilderbergers too of course, who added global ‘cooling’ down on their agenda. He said, watch them distance themselves, all the big governments and so on, from the con men. It says…)
In the climate controversy dubbed Kiwigate, New Zealand skeptics inflict shock courtroom defeat on climatologists implicated in temperature data fraud. (A: So at least in New Zealand they put them on trail and they were found guilty.)
New Zealand’s government via its National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) has announced it has nothing to do with the country’s “official” climate record in what commentators are calling a capitulation from the tainted climate reconstruction. The story is also covered on web news aggregator site, icecap.com.
NIWA’s statement of defense claims they were never responsible for the national temperature record (NZTR). The climb down is seen as a legal triumph for skeptics of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition (NZCSC) who had initiated their challenge last August when petitioning the high court of New Zealand to invalidate the weather service’s reconstruction of antipodean temperatures. (A: That’s poles, very important.) The NZCSC Petition may be read here. (A: It gives you the link and you can read it yourself.)
According to the August official statement of the claim from NZCSC, climate scientists cooked the books by using the same alleged ‘trick’ employed by British and American scientists. This involves subtly imposing a warming bias during what is known as the ‘homogenisation’ process that occurs when climate data needs to be adjusted.
The specific charge brought against the Kiwi government was that its climate scientists had taken the raw temperature records of the country and then adjusted them artificially with the result that a steeper warming trend was created than would otherwise exist by examination of the raw data alone. (A: So they copied it exactly as it was that the East Anglia University boys who were getting millions of bucks getting poured into their research, for all their lies that they were putting out. It’s a political agenda, right.)
Indeed, the original Kiwi records show no warming during the 20th century, but after government sponsored climatologists had manipulated the data a warming trend of 1C appeared.
New Zealand Government Abandons ‘Official’ Climate Record
The NZCSC story reports that the NZ authorities, “formally stated that, in their opinion, they are not required to use the best available information (A: Ha, ha, ha…) nor to apply the best scientific practices and techniques available at any given time. They don’t think that forms any part of their statutory obligation to pursue “excellence.” (A: So, pursuing the truth doesn’t really matter to these scientists. They will pursue the answer that their masters, that pay them through the grants, want. That’s what they’ll pursue.)
NIWA now denies there was any such thing as an “official” NZ Temperature Record,
So in other words, the government is literally distancing themselves from these ‘advisory professionals’ that were going to change… I wonder if they will take the Fart Tax away as well? Because they’ve got all New Zealand farmers paying the Fart Tax for CO2. Maybe they should blow that up as well. That would be quite an explosion in the sky wouldn’t it?
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Prime Minister at G20 on Loss of National Sovereignty
Financial Regulators Planning Worldwide Rules for Large Firms
IMF warns of Parallels to Great Depression
72,000 Stimulus Payments--to Dead People
Professor of Physics--UCLA--Global Warming is Greatest Scam
Legal Defeat for Warmist Camp--New Zealand Gov. Distancing itself From Fake Science
Dr. Tim Ball on Climate Change as Religion
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"