Sept. 29, 2010 (#674)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 29, 2010:
The Collective Corrective:
"Collective Punishment's What Socialists Do,
Where Everyone's Punished for Crimes of a Few,
To Select the Few Would be Discrimination,
So No Rights for Everyone in the Nation,
No Brain Required to Know Something Stinks,
Conclusions are Reached by One Who Thinks,
Simultaneously Countries Enacted Same Bills,
Pre-Co-Ordinated, Gives You the Chills,
The Plan's Paying Off for the Institutions
Which By-Passed Democracy with Elitist Solutions,
Each Right and Freedom these Bills Surrender
Are Kissed Goodbye, Then Gone Forever,
Everyone Knows 9/11 was an Inside Job,
As We're Turned from Humans to "Slavish Mob",
War is Here, Plague and Pestilence Follow,
Then Organized Famine in a Near Tomorrow"
© Alan Watt Sept. 29, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 29, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September 29, 2010. We got cut off a couple of times there at the other end. I donít know whatís happening, but I think Iím back on the air. I always start off by saying go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Youíll find hundreds of audios for download. I get people all the time emailing me asking me where my site is. I canít believe it; I mention this every day at the start of the show. So remember, go into my web site and bookmark all the other sites Iíve got there Ė Iíve got stacks of them. They are all emergency standbys in case the big ones go down. So go in there and help yourself. They also carry transcripts of a lot of the talks Iíve given in English for print up. If you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu - youíll find that also listed on the .com site - and you can take your pick from the various languages of the world.
Remember that you are the audience that brings me to you. I donít go on as a business. I donít go on as a front for corporations who are selling things. I donít accept the cash from advertisers, although Iíve had the offers. And thatís okay; thatís how most folk make their living, by the money from advertising which is quite hefty in fact, if you go for it. But again, it puts you in a bit of a compromise because sometimes the listeners will ask you what you think of this and that, and this particular item, or herb or whatever it happens to be, and you canít make an honest answer if they were maybe sponsoring you for instance. This way I try to do it the cleanest possible way, and you suffer it in the mean time of course because itís up to you to buy the books I sell on the web sites and helping through donations and keeping me going. It is expensive to do what I do. This isnít an hourís show. Thatís what you think it is Ė here itís an hour and heís gone again. This will be uploaded until maybe 1, 1:30, sometimes 2 in the morning. Itís a seven day a week occupation. I wouldnít call it a job. If I wanted a job Iíd find one which was easier. The reason Iím doing this is because itís a vital time to come out with the information and really try and wake up various countries to show them that what is happening in their countries is happening across the whole world and how itís being implemented through international agreements by small bodies of men and your countries sign on to them, to your detriment. Thatís whatís really happening. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Iím back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Remember too, to purchase the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale or you can donate. Thatís all Iíve put out there so far to keep me going. [Order and donation options listed above.] These books are different from the stuff youíll generally read out there. Itís not written by the big CFR boys, and thatís really whoís been giving you your history for about 100 years. Itís the same in Britain too. And the same for the European community now; they have their own branch over the whole of Europe.
Winston Churchill even brought that fact up, in Parliament in Britain, that he was amazed, that he was left outside the loop. He said that it was astonishing that a small group of very powerful wealthy people, and important people, had been able to write the history for all the school books that everyone in Britain would read, and spin it to their own designs. Well nothing has changed. George Orwell touched on it too, true history goes down the memory hole, all the bad bits you know, and it leaves you with this sort of whitewashed, kind of nicey-nicey, quaint, Anne of Green Gables idea of the past and how wonderful it all was, etc. There is no mention of the incredible horror of the industrial era that they brought into some countries. They treated people just like they did with the Chinese, the way they are getting treated today, the peasants of China in the factories. It was no different across Europe and even some of the US too at one point, at one time.
These organizations all stemmed from the Milner Group. Iíve gone through some of the history of the Milner Group. You have to read it for yourself, for those who can read, because most folk today really cannot hold their attention for very long when they are reading something. Try not to get the e-versions because youíll find you canít retain it, off the screen. You can not do so. Too many people have told me the same things; that they cannot retain it but when they try the printed form their memory comes back and actually starts working again, Öbig difference. Iíve told you to go into the books by Professor Carroll Quigley who was the historian for America, for the Council on Foreign Relations. He went into the history of its parent company the Royal Institute of International Affairs. These organizations call themselves institutions, or non-governmental organizations. Very legalistic terms, institutes, because they kind of come up out of the blue by themselves; they fund themselves into existence, the big ones. They become part of the fabric of running your society with a quasi form of legal status and sometimes a complete form of legal status. The Bank of England is an institution. Youíll find the Rockefeller Foundation to an extent is an institution. The Federal Reserve is an institution as opposed to being owned by the government which it really holds on behalf of the public Ė thatís the way it was supposed to be. We have to realize there are many legal terms out there that really do mean a lot to those who create laws, and understand laws, and work with laws.
When the Milner Group branched in with joining in with the Rhodes Foundation and the Rothschilds, they branched into the Royal Institute of International Affairs and ran that organization. The same guys ran it for a long time. They wanted world wars and Quigley talks about this in the book, from their own records, their own archives. They wanted world wars to bring in their type of global government. They set up the institutions across the world to do so. They set up the League of Nations after World War I. It would never have come into effect without World War I and they were all for that. Then, because they didnít have enough power, they claimed, writers for this organization like HG Wells and others said we need another war. And they had their second world war. You do not realize the impact that that has had on all of our lives right to the present day because all these big organizations, international organizations, which work under the United Nations, are really directing our life. Thatís what they mean when they talk about global governance, as opposed to government. Itís governance, which really is government. It really is government. Of course it is. It has the force of law once itís signed into treaties.
The United Nations was set up to have an equivalent department involved for every bureaucratic department to deal with society and your own nation. Everything from building codes, all the way up the line, they have their own one there. In fact they give out all the laws that are signed into law via treaties to the countries that sign. But you donít realize that their idea was based on the British system, that Britain was to be the founding posts you might say, the foundation for this world global system, with a system of what they called free trade Ė which is not free; everything in it is very suspicious until you really read what it really means and get into it. It really is restricted trade for everyone and allowing free trade just for the big international corporations. The world they envisaged at the top was a world where they would do away with all small private businesses. The middle class was to be demolished, in every country across the world. The working classes would work for a long as they had their plant jobs.
They already had it planned when they set up the GATT organization, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, back in I think it was 1949. Every year or so they had meetings across the planet to keep pushing for this free trade idea which would bind countries together, legally under obligations. That worked right up until the World Trade Organization was founded in the 90s. Of course itís the same charter for the GATT organization that they use, as they transform themselves into the World Trade Organization. They are now, really, basically, defacto an institution which direct the trade of the world, who can trade with who. They can technically put forward for fining countries that donít go along in certain cutbacks of trading, or withholding trading, or stopping trade coming into your country. You see, nations used to protect themselves, naturally, from goods being dumped on your doorstep when you are trying to produce the same goods within your own countries.
The same went with the farmers too. Farmers had to make their livingÖ It was a very hard job for farmers. They worked from morning until night. Iíve met lots of them and from different countries. They are all the same, very hard working people. After World War II even they found that they were under massive national governmental bodies within their own countries because theyíd interfered and got right into all the running of their farms and their food systems, because of the war Ė that was the excuse the governments gave to themselves. So each country had a Ministry of Agriculture set up. But now of course, with the GATT treaty in 1949, they would go and work with the world, their treaty, with their Department of Agriculture at the United Nations. So they are institutions, you see, that are really running the world under a form of governance, global governance.
They said in their early treaties too, that they couldnít go too far at one time. They always take the pulse of the public. they never start a premature revolution, as Albert Pike said, and all of these really are social revolutions and economic revolutions that we are talking about. Youíve got to understand that. Most revolutions are bloodless. This article here is about the World Trade Organization.
WTO calls on US to cut farm subsidies
Published: Wednesday September 29, 2010 / rawstory.com
(Alan: They want to CUT the farm subsides, in their own country, and they also want to dump, you know, cheap stuff inside America and put the rest of the farmers out, which suits the big agri-food businesses well because they take them all over, amalgamate them all into huge, huge farms. At the United Nations it should be mentioned too, at their Agricultural Department, they did say Ė itís up there on record Ė one of their CEOs said, food was too important to be left to farmers. You see. And youíd better go into their agenda, their manifesto there, to find out where they are going with it, because they tell you where they are going with it. The UN eventually is to be in charge of ALL the food in the world and they will dish it out accordingly, in rationed quota systems, to the regions, and America will be part of one region and you will also be told, here is the conditions that go with it and youíve got to bring down your populations, we wonít give you extra rations, and so on and so on. This article, they are calling for the US to cut farm subsidies, from the World Trade Organization, formerly called GATT.)
The World Trade Organization called on the United States on Wednesday to cut its farm subsidies, saying that they were so "considerable" that they could affect market prices.
In a report analysing Washington's policies since 2007, the trade body said that while promoting its exports, the United States should also reduce "distorting measures ... including ... support for agriculture." (A: So support for agriculture should be done away withÖ)
The WTO noted that support granted to the sector under the multi-billion-dollar 2008 Farm Act are mostly "linked to prices and or production."
Thanks to this support, "producers of cereals, oilseeds, and cotton are effectively insulated from market prices while sugar and dairy have market price support programmes," said the WTO.
"The large size of the agriculture sector means that the absolute amount of support is considerable, varies from one year to another depending on prices, and can affect world prices," it added.
Understand, in this global system youíve got global austerity, as we all come down, as they slap on more and more taxes to finish us off. Thatís what itís about in the West. The UN is demanding more and more billions and trillions of dollars from all the countries to run its organization as it rises even higher. They have already announced Ė as I said yesterday from an article Ė that they are declaring themselves basically the defacto ruler of the worldÖ which was obvious they were going to do eventually. So they are dishing out more and more laws to get their agenda through quickly. Most folk are so far gone they donít know anymore; they donít really care. You know that? Most folk donít care about anything. They are totally damaged and domesticated. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. Weíre back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how everything is done at the right time, with their 10, 50, 70, 100 year plans. They have plans for every facet of society, including water takeover of the world; that kind of stuff. They do it incrementally. You cannot keep up with this if you tried. Itís impossible. Even going through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, some of their speeches and some of the documents that came out of it, with thousands and thousands of pages per meeting, you canít keep up with this kind of stuff. And thatís only one organization, working with all the other ones at the United Nations. Itís not meant that we really understand whatís really going on. We are focused by the media on election time, thatís all. Where you pick the best pantomime actor and youíll hope for the best and then you hate them 4 years later and get someone else in. So thatís really how the world is run. Itís by institutions and non-governmental organizations which have set up their own little United Nations foundation basically, or institution, to control democracy and eventually eradicate it of course. And republicanism too.
Here they are bitching about the US farm prices and policies. They go on aboutÖ
"Agriculture accounts for only 0.8 percent of US GDP and it employs just 1.4 percent of its labour force," noted Roberto Azevedo, Brazil's envoy to the WTO. (A: Now you know darn well theyíve just named Brazil to come up as an up-and-coming nation. That means that big money is to be flooded into Brazil by the big boys, the globalists, to bring it up to a really high standard. So they get Brazil, who will obviously be bringing a lot of stuff into the US, to bitch about the US trade policies so that they lower them and allow all their stuff to be dumped within the US. Thatís what itís about.)
As I say, thatís only one of so many. Just going through the GATT and then the transformation into the WTO, and their thousands and thousands of pages, itís like readingÖ itís typical socialist gibberish. They cannot say anything plainly. They have to do it in a strange bureaucratese that I first read from Sydney and Beatrice Webb from the Fabian Society; thatís how they wrote. They were really masters at setting up the bureaucratese, and subsection this and paragraph that, pertaining to ya-da, ya-da, ya, and they go on and on and on. Itís not meant for you to read through. Itís meant to switch you off so that you canít read through it and know whatís happening, for those that are trying that is. Very few folk try or care. Iíll put this link up on the site at the end of the show; all of these links in fact.
Now here is the European Union. People really sat and watch this monster being created and then up and running. Each year now, because they are on a roll now, they have conquered everything. They have signed everybodyís sovereignty away into their own. And they are the supremo of the whole of Europe, this giant soviet system. They are NOT democratic. They are authoritarian. They have made that quite plain. And that is to be the role model for the rest of the unifications of the Americas and elsewhere too. It says here in the BBCÖ
EU lays out sanctions to punish budget rebels
The Commission's President Barroso wants to mete out punishment to transgressing governments
bbc.co.uk / 29 September 2010
(A: Here they go you see, they no sooner have you all amalgamated, the last of your sovereignty is gone, and here they are at you to manage your budgets or they are going to fine you. Fine who? Fine the governments. Well, whatís the government? The governments get tax money from the public; thatís whoís going to pay all the fines. They have already been hammered by this planned economic crisis and the bank bailouts and a whole bunch of other things. And here they are going to get hammered with being naughty for not balancing their budgets properly.)
The European Commission has unveiled plans to punish countries (A: Öpunish themÖ this is like school isnít it?) that fail to bring their debts under control and pose a potential risk to the euro.
The proposals include automatic fines for countries that do not manage their finances or their economies properly. (A: Now donít kid yourself for an instant that the big bank of the European Bank is not in cahoots with all the central banks of all these nations as well. Of course they are. They are all the same people really, and often they are related to each other. They know whatís going on. The set it up this way.)
The fines would also affect non-eurozone countries such as the UK, through the suspension of EU aid. (A: So, blackmail again.)
The Commission's proposal will now need to be approved by national governments and the European Parliament. (A: Well you see, there is nowhere here where the people have any say in anything. Their own national governments are going to sign away the last little bit and say, okay, they can now punish us and fine us vast amounts of money that you the taxpayers are going to pay. This is disgusting! This happens. Iíve watched this my whole life, getting deeper and deeper and deeper, and folk just chomp away there and chomp on their popcorn and blow gum and watch the movies.)
However, the French government has previously expressed reservations about the idea of automatic fines. (A: They are fining the countries already for not allowing certain companies in, that donít match up to their work standards for instance. Thatís the law. Youíve got to pay them billions if you donít let them in.)
The fines would apply to non-eurozone countries such as the UK, according to Economic Affairs Commissioner Olli Rehn.
At a news conference, he said that all 27 European Union members could have fines deducted from the funds - such as regional aid (A: Because they are all regions now, you see.) - that they receive from the EU budget. (A: Thatís a little bit of their tax money that they get back for giving about 150% more in. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. Weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just reading this little article here about the EU, the big regime at the top. And it is a regime. Itís non-democratic. Itís authoritarian. Its job is now becoming very, very manifest as they screw everybody out of what little cash theyíve got left. Itís always the taxpayers weíre talking about here that suffer, even from the fines that governments are slapped with. They are talking about keeping the countries within their GDP for the year and not overspending. Well, if you get slapped with millions of pounds, or dollars, of fines, how is that going to help you to keep under your budget? Hmm? Crazy. Listen to the language of it too. It saysÖ
"If these sanctions would have to be implemented... the euro area member states would pay straight from their treasury, while the regime (A: And this is the term they use. This is from their site.) for the EU-27 would work so that we would suspend payment appropriations," said Mr Rehn.
The proposed new rules aim to prevent a repeat of this summer's debt crisis (A: They are blaming the public for the debt crisis.) when the eurozone stepped in to bail out the debt-laden Greek government.
President Barroso says that countries that overspend will be punished. (A: Naughty, naughty little children.)
The Commission's president, Jose Manuel Barroso, said they marked "a sea change in the way economic governance is dealt with in the European Union". (A: Really? † Economic governanceÖ well thatís government you see. When they have the force of law, thatís government. Donít be put off by their terms, or the fact they have special governmental departments called governance, governance for this part, that part and the other.)
"The pressure we have been under since the crisis started shows more clearly than ever that, as the famous saying goes, 'there is no such thing as a free lunch.' There is also no such thing as a free deficit." (A: See, they want eventually to go into every countryís books, do away with the countryís collecting of taxes and all the rest of it, and hand it all over to the International Monetary Fund. Thatís part of the agenda.)
Now when they are bankrupting and completely reorganizing these countries, and calling them little states or regions, they are getting protests of course by the people who are hit the first and hardest, and thatís the poorest of them all.
European cities hit by anti-austerity protests
Protesters take to the streets in Barcelona, Athens and Brussels
bbc.co.uk / 29 September 2010
Tens of thousands of people from around Europe have marched across Brussels in a protest against spending cuts by some EU governments.
Spain has held a general strike, with protesters in Barcelona clashing with police and torching a police car.
Other protests against austerity measures have been held in Greece, Italy, the Irish Republic and Latvia.
Trade unions say EU workers may become the biggest victims of a financial crisis set off by bankers and traders. (A: No, no, no. According to that thing I just read there, itís all your fault. Itís the peopleís fault, according to Barroso.)
Many governments across the 27-member bloc have imposed punishing cuts in wages, pensions and employment to deal with spiralling debts.
On Wednesday night, Portugal's minority government announced proposals to cut civil servants' pay and state spending while raising taxes (A: Aaah, itís always about raising taxes.) in an attempt to lower the country's debt levels. (A: And it goes onÖ and on and on.)
In Britain the government is planning to slash spending by up to 25% in some areas, (A: Thatís, again, MORE cuts to yourÖ can you call it health care anymore? Can you?) while France has seen angry protests against a planned increase in the minimum retirement age.
Police sealed off the EU headquarters and barricaded banks and shops ahead of the protest in Brussels. It was described by unions as a day of action under the slogan "No to austerity, priority to jobs and growth". (A: So, yeah. But thatís not the plan. The plan is to bring us all down to pretty well third world status. This is the new soviet, you understand. Barroso and all these characters are utter world socialists, internationalists. They have no favorite peasants in any country, even the ones they were born in.)
As I say, youíve got to go into Carroll Quigleyís Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment if you want to know what the big, long-term plan happens to be. Once you read it youíll realize that even since it was written a lot of what he talked about that would happen from the late 60s onwards has already been implemented. He goes into the need to set up a world government under a United Nations authority and how the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations were the ones behind it, setting it up, making sure the governments put the funding into it, and making sure it was going off in the right directions. Thatís what itís about. Itís all pretty well completed today.
We are also being poisoned. Iíve told folk before, you know, forget about the fact they are trying to bring down the populations. When you have read enough of the big boysí articles, and there are so many of them, especially in the 40s and 50s Ė they were tremendously open with their ideas on bringing down populations Ė by injections and by altering the food to sterilize people, putting stuff even in the drinking water, which would make them a bit dumber and stupid, more easily managed. Thatís all been accomplished. When they have world meetings about depopulation they donít sit waiting for a Santa Claus to come in so that he can give them their wish list. They obviously IMPLEMENT these particular agendas that they scheme up with. And they are in cahoots with big pharma. Big pharma is part of the Military-Industrial Complex. So, yes, they have been doing it your whole life. Everyone now is guaranteed to come down with cancers. Everyone. They are teaching that to all interns and students that go into medicine. They are taught that right off the bat, that this is normal. They are given no history of previous times when all these cancers were not normal. They are taught the NEW reality. Yeah, itís always been this way; youíve always had people just dropping dead with cancersÖ and thatís what they will believe. Every generation believes what itís told, with their particular indoctrination.
Here is an article about the flu jab too. This one is from Australia.
A flu jab too close for comfort
Natasha Bita, Consumer editor / theaustralian.com.au / September 29, 2010
JUST hours after a doctor jabbed Sharron Coppin's children with a world-first flu vaccine, (A: A first type.) her three-year-old daughter Alivia turned purple.
As Coppin raced the shivering Alivia to a Perth hospital emergency ward, her husband called an ambulance for their one-year-old twins, Byron and Lateesha, who had begun convulsing and vomiting at home.
Little did the panicked parents realise that the flu shot, provided free by West Australian health authorities, had never been tested in children through clinical trials.
"No one warned us this could happen," Coppin says of the febrile convulsions that afflicted one in every 110 Australian children injected with Fluvax, which combines three strains of seasonal and swine flu. (A: By the way, thatís the kind they want to dish out here this year too. They put the swine flu one into the seasonal one.)
"I just took the doctor's word. And the doctor obviously trusted that the government had done all the testing. (A: I told you that for years, the whole of medicine is FAITH basedÖ right down to the person who sticks the needle in you believes what it says on that vial. They believe that, through this faith based system, that all the right things have been done and nothing bad is going to happen, and that what they say is in that vial is actually in it.) If I had known it hadn't been tested, I would never have let my kids be used as guinea pigs. I was trying to protect them, not put them in harm's way."
Coppin is flabbergasted to discover some of the federal Department of Health and Ageing's top immunisation advisers (A: Again too, here is the naivety of peopleÖ) have links with the drug company that created the vaccine that landed her kids in hospital.
"You'd think there'd be something to say that's a conflict of interest," she says. (A: Well, thereís not, if no one says it.)
The Perth mother is not the only one to raise eyebrows over the relationships between Australia's health authorities and the pharmaceutical industry. Some independent researchers are questioning the system in which scientists affiliated with drug companies can also advise the government on matters that affect the pharmaceutical sector. (A: They had that in the US too, with the last flu shot as well, the big scare that never was, as they sold their billions of useless drugs, for a flu that didnít exist. It was found there too, that the guy who had really been in charge of it in the US had worked for the pharma company and still did work for the pharma company that was producing it. You get the same in Britain and elsewhere too. Itís all utterly corrupt. But, they do have a job to do and thatís bring us down, make us autistic, or at least a little bit stupid, and sterilize us in the process. Thatís HOW itís done folks. Itís been done that way since the Salk vaccine came out. It was Dr Salk who gave you the wonderful polio vaccine, who was just SO concerned about children coming down with polio. He happened to be the top member of the Eugenical Society for the States and Britain. He wrote lots and lots of papers about the need to sterilize the public and get rid of the unfit and so on. Read your history. )
The WA government's independent review into the seasonal flu vaccine scare has recommended that the DHA "formally review and address any perceived or real concerns in peak bodies with regard to conflict of interest". (A: Well, that will go nowhere unless the public demand it. So thatís Australia for you too.)
Fluvax, which triggered febrile convulsions in children at nine times the expected rate, was produced by CSL Ltd, Australia's home-grown pharmaceutical giant. CSL also manufactured the federal government's $131m stockpile of Panvax swine flu vaccine.
The Australian revealed last week that two members of the DHA's Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation are also members of CSL's vaccine advisory board. ATAGI chairman Terry Nolan, foundation professor of the school of population health at the University of Melbourne (A: Youíd better check out what they mean by Ďpopulation healthí folks, from their perspective.) and deputy chairman of the research committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council, and ATAGI member Peter Richmond, senior lecturer at the University of Western Australia's school of paediatrics, have declared their links with CSL (A: The company that made this stuff.), including honorariums from the company, in scientific journals.
So, you know, thatís how it goes folks. Itís all Ďin-the-knowí; itís always been that way, by the way. Even the FDA in the US, the big pharmas know that when they want something pushed through, and the public might not go for it, and some others because there are some objections about it, they can always phone selected doctors within the FDA that have worked for them and they are guaranteed to pass the stuff; they actually put the stuff out. A lot of their emails were released last year showing this, when they wanted to get certain drugs through and certain inoculations through, contact doctor so and so, and so and so, and so and so at the FDA, they are ours; they are OUR boys. Thatís how it works. Thatís how it really works.
Iím going to put up an article tonight too. Itís about chemicals in your food.
'Dirty dozen' produce carries more pesticide residue, group says
By Danielle Dellorto, Senior Medical Producer / cnn.com / June 1, 2010
(CNN) -- If you're eating non-organic celery today, you may be ingesting 67 pesticides with it, according to a new report from the Environmental Working Group.
The group, a nonprofit focused on public health, scoured nearly 100,000 produce pesticide reports from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to determine what fruits and vegetables we eat have the highest, and lowest, amounts of chemical residue.
Most alarming are the fruits and vegetables dubbed the "Dirty Dozen," which contain 47 to 67 pesticides per serving. These foods are believed to be most susceptible because they have soft skin that tends to absorb more pesticides.
"It's critical people know what they are consuming," (A: Well, whatís the point? You know what you are consuming, but really most folk canít afford any alternative. Thatís also known at the top. Right.) the Environmental Working Group's Amy Rosenthal said. "The list is based on pesticide tests conducted after the produce was washed with USDA high-power pressure water system. The numbers reflect the closest thing to what consumers are buying at the store."
The group suggests limiting consumption of pesticides by purchasing organic for the 12 fruits and vegetables. (A: Well, how many folk can afford that, in todayís market? They are all losing their jobs and their homes and all the rest of it.)
"You can reduce your exposure to pesticides by up to 80 percent by buying the organic version of the Dirty Dozen," Rosenthal said. (A: Well, maybe Mrs Rosenthal can. Then they go on to list the ones that are really high in it, all the different fruits and veggies, the stuff thatís more likely to get it.
The Dirty Dozen
Celery Ė Peaches Ė Strawberries Ė Apples - Domestic blueberries Ė Nectarines - Sweet bell peppers - Spinach, kale and collard greens Ė Cherries Ė Potatoes - Imported grapes - Lettuce
Not all non-organic fruits and vegetables have a high pesticide level. Some produce has a strong outer layer that provides a defense against pesticide contamination. The group found a number of non-organic fruits and vegetables dubbed the "Clean 15" that contained little to no pesticides. (A: That is listed there as well, for those that are interested.)
The Clean 15
Onions Ė Avocados - Sweet corn Ė Pineapples Ė Mango - Sweet peas Ė Asparagus - Kiwi fruit Ė Cabbage Ė Eggplant Ė Cantaloupe Ė Watermelon Ė Grapefruit - Sweet potatoes - Sweet onions
Really, we are all just walking test tubes, when we eat all this rubbish. Plus you have the GMO factor too, which supposedly they are putting into the States quicker and quicker. Canada is already a goner because they were the guinea pigs for 10 years before the government had to admit it. We didnít even know we were eating the rubbish, but thatís the way it goes. You see, democracy is over; it never really existed. You are under authoritarianism now; you take it or leave it.
There is an article here as well from the TSA.
Secure Flight Program
(A: They are going into the NEXT phase of security. You understand, they keep releasing out these thingsÖ oh, you are going to get x-rayed here, it will only be surface, donít worry. Then they come out and say, oh, weíre going to x-ray your bones as well for ID, but donít worry about it, itís safe. Then, once youíve accepted thatÖ See, they are just training you Pavlovian style to the next step and the next step and the next step.)
Secure Flight is a behind the scenes program that enhances the security of domestic and international commercial air travel through the use of improved watch list matching. By collecting additional passenger data, it will improve the travel experience for all airline passengers, including those who have been misidentified in the past. (A: And locked up and torturedÖ I thought Iíd add that part.)
When passengers travel, they will be required to provide the following Secure Flight Passenger Data (SFPD) to their airline when making a reservation:
Name as it appears on government-issued I.D. when traveling: (A: Ögovernment issued IDÖ thatís for internal as well.)
Date of Birth Ė Gender - Redress Number (if available)
The airline will transmit this information to Secure Flight, (A: Thatís another company.) who uses it to perform watch list matching. This serves to prevent individuals on the No Fly List from boarding an aircraft and to identify individuals on the Selectee List for enhanced screening. After matching passenger information against government watch lists, Secure Flight transmits the matching results back to airlines.
Airlines must request and collect full name, date of birth, and gender, and Redress Number (if available) as of August 15, 2009 for domestic flights and as of October 31, 2009 for international flights. However, Secure Flight will be phased-in with each airline. Passengers should not be concerned if particular airlines do not ask them to provide the additional information right away; it should not impact their travel. (A: Then it goes on to explain what these supposed secure flight questions are and all the rest of it.)
By the way, they are also going back to, apart from all your body scans and magnetometers and all the rest of it, they are also going to go back to pat you down as well. So they see you naked through their screening stuff, then they pat, I guess, the ones they select down, the ones that theyíll get off on. Thatís whatís all coming along. We are treated just like animals. BehaviorismÖ you know, Skinnerianism; thatís what it is. Skinner technology, Skinner techniquesÖ thatís whatís being used. And the public adapt. They do. They do. We are the most adaptable species on the planet. What a SAD thing to sayÖ when itís in our worst interest. If you have no pride in yourself, at all, do you understand you are defeated? You are completely and utterly defeated. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Cutting Through The Matrix, just finishing up there with the article on the latest step by step phasing in of more totalitarian rules for travel. And there is a lot more to go, believe you me, even internal travel with your cars and so on; itís big, BIG plans coming down the pike. You are IN the new world soviet system, the socialist system and itís authoritarian as I say. But when you have no pride or dignity left in yourself you are conquered. Conquered. You see, you live in a degenerate society already. They have taken 50 years to totally degenerate the society. Thatís part of the reason why there is no pride or dignity in the individuals, or in their fellow man. They see everyone as the same as themselves, just degenerate. They have lost their ability to even think of themselves as anything with human rights or special rights or anything of the kind.
In the Soviet Union they had collective punishment. This is the system they are using worldwide now. If someone or a group of people did something that they didnít like at the government, theyíd pass a law to basically affect EVERYONE. Now, if millions and millions of people, say in Britain for instance, are good law-abiding citizens and the government intentionally brought people in from countries that they plan to bomb, down the road in the future Ė they knew theyíd cause trouble. But why should all the rest of the people have to suffer because they brought a few people in who demonstrate? Hmm? Thatís collective punishment. Youíre ALL suspects; we canít discriminate, they tell you. Thatís the reasons that they give you, rubbish like that. So you all have to suffer because of the wrongs of a few. I donít think so. I donít think so.
An article here too, Iíll just finish off withÖ
Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
Posted by Sharyl Attkisson / cbsnews.com / September 9, 2010
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.
Hannah was described as normal, happy and precocious in her first 18 months. (A: Thatís normal. They get up to saying dada, mama, and so on.)
Then, in July 2000, she was vaccinated against nine diseases in one doctor's visit: †measles, mumps, rubella (A: Thatís typical.), polio, varicella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae. (A: All at once.)
Afterward, her health declined rapidly. (A: Thatís generally what happens. They go backwards and stop saying dada and mama and laughing and so on.) She developed high fevers (A: Because the stuff attacks your brain, folks, and the people who end up with autism itís more obvious, obviously. It affects everyone that gets it. Youíre all told, the doctors are all told to tell every mother, oh, donít worry, there will be a bit of a fever. And where is the fever located? Itís in your brain, folks. Your brain is hot. It killsÖ You know inflammation kills off cells, you understand that? But then again, you become a very good citizen that bends over at airports.), stopped eating, didn't respond when spoken to, began showing signs of autism, and began having screaming fits. In 2002, Hannah's parents filed an autism claim in federal vaccine court. Five years later, the government settled the case before trial and had it sealed. It's taken more than two years for both sides to agree on how much Hannah will be compensated for her injuries.
In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder (A: Itís not a disorder, by the way. Weíre all different. And youíll live fine, and prosper fine if they donít stick their damn poisons in you, and their bacterial and viral warfare as well. Thatís also in there. They try to blame the victims, saying, Youíre a bit different, you see, we aim for the mass people, but youíre a bit different; itís really YOUR fault. Öa mitochondrial disorderÖ HA!) Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it. (A: Oh, thatís the shysters for you in court.) It's unknown how many other children have similar undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder. All other autism "test cases" have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.
Everyone gets hit with this. And you know, attention deficit disorder and all the other disorders theyíve come up with, they find it very hard to even diagnose these things or even tell you what they are. The fact is everyone has been hit. We are all quite a few points low, or lower than we should be. They lowered the official IQ quite a few years ago, on the advice of the UN.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
World Trade Organization calls for US to Cut Farm
EU Unrolls Punishment Plans for Overspending Ex-Nations
Flu Jabs--Purple Faced Children, Untested Vaccine and Conflict of Interest
Pesticide List of the Most Contaminated Foods
Secure Flight Program
Family Successfully Sues Pharma in First ever Vaccine-Induced Autism