Aug. 25, 2010 (#650)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 25, 2010:
Controllers, Sleazy, All too Easy:
Get Rich Quick, Says Repetitive Parrot,
Tempting Slaves to Run for the Carrot:
"Man, Observed for Thousands of Years,
Wise Men Noted His Interests, Habits, Fears,
His Loves, His Moods, The Things He Hated,
All in Order So He Could be Manipulated,
In a Free World His Instincts for Survival
Were Sharply Honed 'fore Wise Men's Arrival,
Then Tempted by Commerce, Fantasy of Ease,
He Began to Work, His New Master to Please,
Little by Little, All His Instincts Were Blunted,
Until Man Independent Became Man the Hunted,
For His Childish Optimism to Work and Save,
Served Masters Well, Yet He a Wage Slave,
And for All He Earns, He Seldom Relaxes,
Buying Power Keeps Falling, Lots of Taxes,
Old Man Would have Smelled a System Rotten,
The New Man is too Docile, Survival Forgotten"
© Alan Watt Aug. 25, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 25, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 25, 2010. Newcomers as always, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Youíll see hundreds of talks Iíve given which you can download in audio form for free. Remember too, all these sites that youíll see listed on the front page there, you should bookmark them for future use in case there is a problem with the main .com site; it happens once in a while. [Official sites listed above.] Remember all those sites have transcripts in English of a lot of the talks Iíve given for print up. If you want transcripts in other languages you can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download them for print up if you so wish. Remember too, you are the listeners that bring me to you. You are the only guys that help me to get from day to day by supporting me. I donít get paid from advertising. The ads on the show pay the station directly for the air time. It pays for RBNís staff and equipment and their bills so I ask you to help me with mine. Go into the web sites; see the books [and disks] I have for sale. They are different from the other books youíll get out there because I donít go through the usual form of dry, authorized HIStory. Thatís what stories are, is HIS story, the guy thatís authorized to do it. Itís always been that way, by the way; still is today. I show you the cons that are used down through the ages, as we are controlled by the big boys at the top. Excuse my allergies today because this is what we get this time of year up here. Itís allergy time. Remember too, you can purchase these books by [Order and donation options listed above.]. That hopefully will let me trickle by from day to day.
On this show I go into the big picture. I donít tend to concentrate just on whatís happening today because Iíve lived from day to day all my life knowing whatís going on and so have you too. Youíve all lived through your daily news announcements from the media, the guys that are between you and the big boys at the top; thatís the MIDDLE MAN, the MEDIA, thatís what that means. They give you your thoughts for the day and what you are supposed to be afraid of, what you are supposed to be laughing at, and so on, and the trivia as well. Whatís the point in just following it from day to day? Itís like literally giving a blow-by-blow account of a boxing match: he hits him with a left, he hits him with a right. And thatís what you do. You follow the stuff and get all scared like little lab rats watching the guys come in with the white coats, asking, are they going to stick needles in us today or are they going to shock us? Itís the same technique thatís used on the general public. Professor Carroll Quigley and others have gone into this Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations and they said that all the big boys have always been, for 100 years, members Ė the guys who own the media Ė of these organizations. They OWN the media. Thatís why you have media barons. The barons go over and get knighted by the Queen, from pretty well every country across the planet including the United States. So we are run by the big boys, with a big plan. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I like that little guitar riff, itís wailing because you feel like howling once in a while. Itís not a bad idea to go out the back and give a good howl. It gets it off your chest, especially if no one else is listening. The birds donít mind up here, or the animals.
The world we are living in really is an incredible plan. Itís an incredible plan worked out by very rich people, the richest people on the planet, a long time ago and we are going through the VERY program that they published in SO many books in the late 1800s and the early 1900s and the early 20th century. After World War II they kind of toned things back a bit because they were very blatant for their plans for the future with their big depopulation programs, their eugenics schemes. But you know something? Under this guise of terrorism and the fact that they are training the public step by step, who ARE adapting to every part of the changes, they are coming out, right in our faces again, with the same agenda. Now itís only a matter of convincing the public to accept the agenda. Thatís all they have to do now. They do it by the standard technique they have always used, they bring on pros and cons, professors who are against something and other ones who are for something. They battle it out, supposedly, on television. Itís all scripted before they get on TV, you just donít know that. Itís the same with politics too. Thatís how itís always been done.
Here is an article here on this very topic. Itís from the BBC, you know, the government station in Britain; thatís who runs it. This particular article is about a show that was aired I think yesterday and itís about eugenics. Here they go, right on BBC Radio 4 it is actually, and itís on a series called Iconoclasts. The next episode is on Saturday for those who can tune into it, on BBC Radio 4 to be precise. It says here,
BBC Radio 4 Programmes
Iconoclasts Series 3 Episode 1
bbc.co.uk / Producer: Peter Everett.
Edward Stourton chairs a live debate in which Professor David Marsland defends his view that the mentally and morally unfit should be sterilised. (Alan: No kidding folks. Iíve been talking about this for years coming along and itís in your face now.) Professor David Marsland is Emeritus Scholar of Sociology and Health Sciences at Brunel University, London and Professorial Research Fellow in Sociology at the University of Buckingham.
He argues that the only way to prevent the abuse and neglect of children (A: This is the excuse you see.) whose parents are incapable of looking after them (A: And that will start the ball rolling.) is to stop them from being born in the first place. It should be open to police and social workers to recommend (A: Police and social workersÖ to recommendÖ) that drug addicts, alcoholics and the mentally disabled should be irreversibly sterilised - and the courts should be able to enforce this. Challenging his views will be three expert witnesses including a senior social worker, a drugs charity lawyer and a moral philosopher. (A: So social workers, police, and so on, will work together to get YOU irreversibly sterilized.)
Donít you believe for a single minute, or instant, that this is just for drug addicts or alcoholics and the mentally disabled. Do you understand, under the war ON terror, which is a war OF terror, do you understand with all the things that have happened to you in your whole lifetime with your inoculations, your food and all the rest of it, with the IQs dropping, WE ARE ALL MENTALLY DISABLED. Do you understand what they are saying here? Do you think theyíd really stick to what they say? When has a law been put on the books just for what they say itís for? Itís ALWAYS expanded. And these guys, these lying SOBs, have been at this for an awful long time. This is straight out of the eugenics programs that were run by Britain and the US, and in the US it was run under Rockefeller that sterilized thousands and thousands of people throughout the 20th century right into the 1970s. But they want to do this across the world too, of course, and thatís what they are not mentioning here. It aired yesterday, the first show. The second show is on Saturday apparently and you can get all the details. Iíll put the link up for you to go in for the details on my web site at the end of the show.
Quite something, but it doesnít surprise me because Iíve been watching. Iíve read their script. You see, you donít need a crystal ball to predict whatís going to happen. You just read their books, your whole life long, and they havenít changed. Why would they change? Itís like the articles Iíve read over the years about how the military itself has experimented on its own subjects in Britain and in the US and in Canada and other countries, since before World War IIÖ with various nerve gases, various viruses, bacterium, and so onÖ continued right through to the present time by the way; I read an article the other day about Dengue fever being let loose by the military in Florida. Do you think that, well, thatís a long time ago, you knowÖ it was a few years ago. Really? Whatís changed in the mindset of those who rule the world? Whatís changed? Do you think theyíve become more what we call civilized? Who gave us the term civilized? Do you even know what it means? They tell you morality is basically fluid. They give you moralities for different generations. Itís given by the culture industry. Believe you me, with these guys, these so-called experts, going through their scripted, produced argument for the radio, youíll find people, ordinary folk, joining them saying, maybe they are right, you knowÖ maybe they are right. And thatís how you get sucked into it. You give upÖ
Do you understand there are LEGALITIES in all of this? The biggest legality of all is not from some judge in a court passing some law or referring to some law. The first thing you do is acquiesce your own power to someone else. You give it up VOLUNTARILY. Thatís what you do. Thatís what you do. Natural lawÖ natural law, thatís what it is.
They put out these articles always in series at the same time. They call them themes and memes and whole bunch of different terms that they like to use, or trends is another thing they are using too. Because they want to get the message across from different sources at the same time so no matter where you go youíve kind of vaguely heard it somewhere because everybody lives in a vague world today of little bits and bytes of information because you have information overload. So many are plugged in all the time, walking along the street; they never have a break to think for themselves. They donít need to think for themselves. They are OWNED; they are owned by their bosses that gave them all this gadgetry. So they come out with all these articles at the same time. Here is another one too. This is in the Telegraph mainstream newspaper too.
Author Amanda Craig calls for two-child limit for 'the poor'
(A: Right. Remember what they said in eugenics? Iíve read their articles from the top, from their own books on the air over the years and itís in the archives section of my site. They have said that poverty is an inherited gene, itís a bad gene. Thatís what they claim. Itís genetic they say. So here is an author, ďAmanda Craig calls for two-child limit for the poor...Ē just like China and Iíve said for years, and year after year, that the United Nations claimed that China was the MODEL STATE for the whole world to copy. Your wonderful United Nations, the big front for the boys who set it up and the Royal Institute of International Affairs.)
Amanda Craig, the British novelist, says the Coalition Government should ban 'poor' people from having more than two children, to help save the environment. (A: Öas well. It will help save the environment, all these poor people hanging about eating things and stuff like that.)
By Tim Walker / telegraph.co.uk / 25 Aug 2010
While Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary (A: Thatís the guy who works in government.), argues with the Chancellor, George Osborne (A: Another peon in government.), over the costs of welfare reform, Amanda Craig has come up with a suggestion likely to ignite another row. (A: Well she was told to, right.)
The novelist says "poor people" should be banned from having more than two children because of "the ecological need to limit families". (A: Yep. I wonder how many sheís got?)
Craig, who has two teenage children by her husband, Rob Cohen, an Old Etonian economist, says: "Surely, this is something that the new Government could look at. The benefits system (A: Thatís your welfare system.) actively encourages poor people to have large families, which can't be good for responsible parenting, for the children involved or for the environment.
"Those who work and pay taxes have to consider very carefully the number of children they have. Most stop at two. Why should those on benefits be any different?"
Craig, 50, who was educated at Bedales School, has written in the past about how much she would have liked a third child. "To have had one when we first became a couple would have been the end of our relationship, but, by the time we could afford a baby, I was too old to have more than two," she said. (A: Well, she wanted her career and all that stuff, right.)
So you see there will be stacks of these types of characters that are maybe vaguely well known in their own countries or in their own area, all told to come out with the same stuff at the same time. Because believe you me, they all attend the same globalistic meetings. Thatís how they choose them. And they are told what to say. You know, I read from a book called Americaís Cultural Cold War and it uses declassified information, from the CIA, that is publicly available, to show you how the CIA GAVE you and controlled the entire culture in the US and Europe from the end of World War II right through, and they stop around the 70s with declassifying whoís who in the culture industry. Itís amazing to see that at the top of the list, the top of the list they said, has always been, their favorites were always NOVELISTS. They pick the novelists, told them the stories to write, told them to put the usual stuff in to get the people hooked on it, a little emotional human-interest story, someone getting chased or whatever, and make sure you get the REAL points embedded in the story. They have been doing it forever. Now they do it with movies too of course. You pay for this with your tax money. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm back and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Years ago I talked about eugenics and it really caught on eventually with other Patriot Radio stations. Eventually, it was a slow start for them because many people didnít think that what happened in the past had any pertinence to whatís going on today or to come in the future. Gradually they all changed when I kept harping on and harping on because a lot of folk follow the lead of this show. Now we are at that stage where everything is coming true.
I mentioned the fact too, that Lenin talked about the setting up in the West. Of course it was all a deal with the West, again, and London, the big City of London, to set up a world empire, and eventually combine the two systems together where you would have what would seem to be a sovietized bureaucracy with all the minions underneath it and the big capitalists on top. Thatís what the Reece Commission also came out with in the United States in the 1950s when they investigated the big foundations, the parallel government that the Royal Institute of International Affairs has always worked through. Thatís how you get things done. You FUND them into existence by pressure groups, well funded, full time, and pensioned even, pension-planned groups. Thatís what you do. There are thousands of them out there but really run by a few and owned by a few.
I also talked about all the agencies that Lenin said would get set up in the West, kind of welfare agencies to an extent too, but he also said Ďservices.í He meant police services and he also meant health services, things like that, even Child Care Services. They all start off as services. They seem pretty harmless when they first take off. They are not so intrusive and they donít have so many rights. But he said, eventually Ė this is Lenin talking. He said, eventually these services will become authorities over the public. And he darn well knew the plan. He knew the complete plan for the whole 20th century into the 21st century. There is no doubt about that whatsoever. Iíve read some of the books put out by the Council on Foreign Relations themselves, their membersí copies, going as far back as the 20s and 30s. They discuss the whole 20th century and the 21st century, and the wars that were to come were incidental on the way. Even before World War II happened they were writing about it and even a post-war world and what kind of world it would be and how they would make it soÖ in their own meetings, world meetings. We are living through a script as I say.
They backed off a little bit after World War II because you see, the guy who took up the eugenics banner, FROM Britain and the United States, was Adolf Hitler. He went after minorities he said were unfit. They did send out what they called the sanitary, basically health workers, out, groups of them to sterilize people in all the different hospitals that they claimed were unfit, or mentally retarded, or whatever. The racial hygiene policies and so on all came into effect as well. So they backed off, but believe you me they never stopped. They knew, and I used to wonder about this too. How come a guy like Lenin, who was funded by the big bankers from the West Ė he had the best tutors that money could buy because they were the guys who made the money; they literally made it out of nothing. However, Lenin himself said eventually the state, the nation-state, will wither away and police and armies would too. I thought, well how on earth would that be if human nature doesnít change and we still live in a monetary type system? Itís like the seed to the rats in a laboratory, they pull the little lever to get the seed. Thatís the money that we run on, the same thing as the seed. The rats can get so trained on it that if you put a whole bunch of free seed, a pile of it not far way, they will still ignore it and go to the little lever they are supposed to pull to get a seed. We are the same. We forget we donít need the money as they give it to us, certainly not the stuff they give us, and run.
You see, they knew that with their work through technology, because they have ALWAYS been SO far ahead of society, WAY AHEAD of any of their media is going to print because the media only prints what itís told to print. The technique is to make you live in what you think is the present but itís really the past as far as technology goes. Whenever they give you something new itís antiqueÖ and they are using it at the top. Itís the same with genetics and all the rest of it; the same with computers. They keep showing us the same old stuff, with the old computers about 6 feet tall with the big rolling tapes inside of them and all that. Yeah, they might have had that on a lower level but at the top level they were way beyond that. But they knew the state would wither away because eventually no one could possibly buck the system. Youíd be watched 24 hours per day, everywhere you go, whatever you do, by the Ďinternet of thingsí because everything is interfaced, you see. Thatís what the kicking off of the war OF terror is all about, getting all this stuff rammed through that was ready to go. It was all set up during the Cold War with the satellites they put up there. It was put up by Regan too under Star Wars; nothing to do with the Russians. They knew darn well down the road the wall was coming down. They even knew the YEAR it was coming down. The Rockefellers took an assembly over to talk to Gorbachev, years before it, and said, you have no choice because the whole of Europe is uniting under a common market, a new parliament; itís time now to quit. Thatís the real world folks. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Isnít it amazing you can actually read this stuff, inquire into the big boysí books, over many, many years of living? When other people were doing other things I went to libraries when I got a chance, in different countries even, because itís amazing what you can turn up in the old reference sections. Here are these same characters with their same agenda publishing it in even newspapers back then, which they still had in some of the libraries in Britain. In their big, thick, well funded books that were put out there by their foundations, the SAME agenda.
You know, Adolf Hitler was Man of the Year by Time-Life Magazine TWICE in the 1930s. The Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations thought it was just swell to watch this new experiment, you see, public experiment in socialism, a new controlled society, the first society that came out really with science at the top. Supposedly the Soviet Union was the same, an atheistic society with nothing but just science and logical people running the country. That was the same idea that Adolf Hitler picked up on and ran with. He got his ways to use eugenics FROM the Soviets. Youíve got to see The Soviet Story. It was pretty well banned by the EU parliament there were so many objections from the leaders of Russia at the time; it let too much out of the bag. But youíve got to get a hold of it if you can, The Soviet Story. Youíll see Adolf Hitler and the boys, they had to go to the Soviets, when they were all pals together. They were both socialists remember, and socialism was created by the very extremely wealthy, the big banking boys, for their world society. Itís far easier to ram it through that way than any other wayÖ where people think they have rights and say, ďno, Iím not going to do that,Ē to their government; ďI wonít do that.Ē No, they want people to obey a government who are afraid of them so they just simply obey.
Adolf came out with the eugenics and he copied right from Rockefellers, The Perfected American FamiliesÖ you know, the genetically superior ones. If you go through even the internet youíll find the photographs where they published every month the family of the week in different US states who were certified as superior genetically, in Mr Rockefellerís big movement at the time; the same in Britain. HG Wells was exactly the same, the little squirt that he was. He really was too, a little squirt with a very high-pitched voice and folk laughed at him when he spoke at the Fabian Society; they couldnít stand too much of him without bursting into giggles. But he would stand up there and pontificate about how the world should be run, etc, etc. And who was he? He was the son of a drunk who, yeah, was born into the right class, but hired himself out Ė this is how he made a living. His dad made a living being a batsman in cricket; they used to hire him as a spare guy for cricket matches. His mother was a maid in a house where he was brought up. And because of this fear he had of the working class that passed his house every day, on their way to the mines and the factories, he despised them. So they pickedÖ see they pick up the little fools at the bottom to do their dirty work for them and do all the hard work of night after night of writing, although he was given teams of writers to bring all this stuff through. Itís been like that with all the top novelists as well, right through the 20th century up to the present time.
You know in Canada itís so socialistic here, and every country by the way has its Department of Culture, they call it. Youíve got one in the US, one in Britain, one in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc, etc, all put up during World War II and they are still there today. They decide what your culture is going to be. They decide whatís going to get shown on television, not because they want to save your culture, the old culture that you had, or the present one. No. They see if you are ready to have the envelope pushed to the next step. Thatís what itís all about. Most of the novelists in Canada, and artists that sit and paint and do strange little welding sculptures and so on and stick people, live on grants from the government, your tax money. The nihilistic art, that was also in Americanís Cultural Cold War, the United Statesí book about the CIA. We live in a fairy land of managed make-believe, but itís very important we are all managed in the same make-believe at the same time, the same program.
The state will wither away because no one, with nanotechnology in their clothing, cameras everywhere, implanted chips within you, and all the rest of it, you will be unable to do anything wrong and get away with it. Remember, what they classify as wrong is whatever they say is wrong, or right, at the time. And that will keep changing too, by the way. Here is what the government saysÖ
The Government's New Right to Track Your Every Move With GPS
(A: Well guess what? They have been doing that since they put them up there.)
By Adam Cohen / yahoo.com / Thu Aug 26, 2010
Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go. This doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment rights, because you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own driveway - and no reasonable expectation that the government isn't tracking your movements. (A: Well guess what too? They put out in Britain years ago, the fact that everybody who applies to be an MI-5 agent is put through various tests. One of the first ones is to plant a bug, a tracking device under someoneís car that they are told to put it under, without getting caught. They have been at this forever folks. Iíll bet you anything, and I really mean this, when they gave you the first Bell telephones, they were already monitoring everything you were saying. I know they were certainly using it to manipulate the stock markets. These are the guys who help fund it into being, because Bell belonged to the same club. Anyway, here they go with their GPS and so on. They donít need a search warrant. They donít need to do anything else. They just need to go up there and stick it on you and watch what you are doing. It saysÖ)
That is the bizarre - and scary - rule that now applies in California and eight other Western states. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers this vast jurisdiction, recently decided the government can monitor you in this way virtually anytime it wants - with no need for a search warrant.
It is a dangerous decision - one that, as the dissenting judges warned, (A: Now that means nothing. Theyíve got to go through this routine of warning you; thatís not a legality.) could turn America into the sort of totalitarian state imagined by George Orwell. It is particularly offensive because the judges added insult to injury with some shocking class bias: the little personal privacy that still exists, (A: And thatís an interesting statementÖ ďthe little personal privacy that still exists,ĒÖ) the court suggested, should belong mainly to the rich. (A: How is that to tie in with the eugenics story? Hmm?)
People often say, well, now that I know this what do I do with it? Well, Iíll tell you. You cannot just sit on it. Youíve got to start telling other people too, and get enough angst, their angst up, literally angst, because you should be awfully, awfully insulted at least, at the very, very least insultedÖ with whatís going on and whatís already gone on. And youíd better understand that they MEAN what they say when say they are taking it right all the way to eugenics. Donít believe for an instant that you might not be picked on. Supposing you break some little law you donít even know exists? Supposing they say, our GPS has noticed, and our tracking devices have noticed, and our nanotechnology has noticed, that you jaywalked 10 times this year? Öand some social worker comes along with a cop and says, we are pulling you in for sterilization. Do you think Iím kidding? Most of you will. You will laugh awayÖ you always do, the ones that donít really want to believe it. Well, tough luck. Tough luck, eh.
You know the reason that people go to the wall during wars, to get shot, and they obey their captors, right to the last second, is because they cannot believe itís actually personally happening to them. Thatís why you only need a couple of soldiers and maybe 100 or 200 people, or victims, 2 guys with rifles, and the people will do what they are told. Itís only 1 in maybe 500 that tries to make a bolt for it, because heís got a little chance there. Heís got none at all if he goes along. But everyone believes right to the last second, God or something is going to intervene because this cannot happen to me.
Facial recognitionÖ an article here too.
The facial recognition software that will put a name to every photograph in the internet
By Daily Mail Reporter / dailymail.co.uk / 23rd August 2010
(A: Any people who share all these free programs, oh, come and put your stuff here; itís all free, free, free. Itís all for the National Security Agency. I said back in 1998, this is for the NSA. All these things, Google and all the rest of them, were NSA, and no one would pick up on that until recently. Itís the National Security Agency. They give you the appearance of competition initially; itís all BS Ė bothersome stuff. Thatís to fool YOU, because we are just the animals. They have anthropologists working on us all the time, just like zoologists work WITH the anthropologists, by the way. And they do, they say that what will work with the animal will work with you. And they are right. So here you go.)
A software company is developing revolutionary software which provides the ability to identify people from photographs posted on the internet. (A: Again, guess what? They have been doing that since they gave you the darn thing, and the programs to put your photographs up with. That was part of the purpose of it. I can remember talking to Canadians coming to Britain back in the 1970s. Some of them showed me their photographs. They were taking these digitalized photographs that were taken when they went up to the Canadian National Tower in Toronto. At the time was this revolutionary thing that gave them this little picture, made up of the binary codes, the numbers, and it was all put together. You could see the little zeroes and ones and it made up the face of the person. They were already digitalizing photographs back then, and using them. The people were volunteering and paying for it thinking this was all fun. Anthropologists and zoologists eh? You see if they come along and say, youíd better take thisÖ you are a bit suspicious I hope, I hope you are a bit suspicious. If they came along at the beginning and says, youíve GOT to take this computer, itís mandatory, we would all be VERY suspicious. But no, they call it a Ďpersonalí computer. I went through the story of who gave the name to the Ďpersonalí computer, ex-military guys all of them; top CIA guys who gave you rock and roll too, and LSD. Iíve gone through that too on the programs not too long ago, in the archives section. Yeah, personal, itís your personal computer. See, if you buy it, it isnít so bad is it? But if they make you have one youíd be, hopefully, hopefully, some of you would be a little suspicious. SoÖ)
A software company is developing revolutionary software which provides the ability to identify people from photographs posted on the internet.
Face.com has produced technology (A: Yeah, they really did it themselves, eh?) that can identify individuals on social networking sites and online galleries by comparing their image against a known picture of them.
It means detailed profiles of individuals can be built up purely from online photographs and critics have said it could lead to exploitation by employers. (A: You know what? That means nothing in legality either. We can complain all we want. But technically too, whenever experts say anything to us, or judges say anything to us and they warn us of whatís coming, or the Commissioner of Privacy as the British Commonwealth countries have, when they come out and say, they warn you that you are losing your privacy and your rights and all the rest of it, that means nothing either. In fact they tell you in Canada, because they have no power to do anything, they can just warn you, they are giving you legalities. You acquiesce when you do nothing about it. Thatís how law is built up, from common law. It becomes common because you accept it, over a period of timeÖ no one complainedÖ But they love their legalities. They do love their legalities.)
So itís just one thing after another. Believe you me, there will be nights, in maybe a few weeks or a month or so, where I could go on all night about the next gadget and gizmo to track and monitor and so on because they are rolling stuff out that they had working YEARS and YEARS and YEARS ago. The same with nanotechnology, they had it long before they announced it to the public. Whenever they say, we are working on something, or scientists have found, and publish it to the cattle down below - thatís us - they have had it for YEARS. That way you are never suspicious. You think you are on the cutting edge. Yeah. Thatís how you thinkÖ you are on the cutting edge. Remember what Brzezinski said in his own book Between Two Ages, and he worked with the NSA. In the 1970s he wrote the book and he said, shortly the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves; they will only be able to repeat their download, what they have been told by the media from the previous day when they go to work. They will chat about what they have been told by the media. He even said that, they expect the media to be an extension of their brain, to do their reasoning for them. People have given up their ability to reason. They truly trust the media. They think itís a natural thing like gravity or air that you breathe. You are born into it. Itís always been there. And surely the most trusted men in America or the most trusted man in Canada, Mr Mansbridge, or whoever trusted person they give you, as they keep telling you how wonderful they are, theyíd never lie to you, those guys who talk to you at the 6 oíclock news every nightÖ never. Therefore when you tell people all this stuff they will say, oh, I donít believe that, surely the media would tell us. Thatís the first thing they will say to you, oh, the news guys would tell us.
You are living in the biggest con beyond any science fiction movie you have ever seen. And itís gone on for an awful, awful long time. And only a few people in every generation have had the ability, or the desire, to track and trace it and study it. Others, sure enough, people are worrying and scurrying to work and so on as we go through ups and downs, all the time with financial depressions. A few years of the good time and they will party, etc, but the rest of the time they are worrying, they are scurrying, they donít want to hear anything serious when they are off work. They get zonked out on booze, drugs, sex, whatever, to get through another day, the next day. But when you ask those folk, do you really know whatís going on in the world? Oh yeah, they will tell you, because they get it all from the media, the news. Thatís what they want to believe folks. Thatís what they want to believe. Those folk are already goneÖ by choice and consent. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm back and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the speed now, as they speed up the agenda, everything is in place, across the whole world. The world has always been the goal. Thatís why they opened the floodgates of immigration across the entire planet and encouraged people to flood in to countries that were not set up for them, during the times of financial depression as well. People used to shop, according to the news media, again the news media that tells you things to upset you when they want to. You used to see people shopping for the best countries to live in, as refugees. Refugee status was easy to get in places like Britain. Theyíd have Britain at the top for health care, welfare, and all the other things they could give them and people would shop across Europe looking for this. Then they turn around when there are so many people there and say, oh, look at this, there are too many of you; weíve got to start sterilizing you. See, they cause the problems and turn around and blame you, the victim. They make it happen and then they blame you. And people canít figure that out. If you are after the world and youíve got countries that donít have an excess or big population, it would be awfully hard to make them go along with this whole world agenda if they were doing okay and there were jobs for all and all the rest of it. Theyíve got to get everybody into it in the same mess and turn around and say, oh, look at the state you are in, you canít go on like this.
MoralityÖ morality is flexible, as I say. Itís plastic. They give you one morality for one generation, another for another generation. Remember what they said, Julian Huxley, the brother of Aldous Huxley. The first CEO of UNESCO, he says, weíve got to drop man from his pedestal, teach him that he is just an animal, and they will do it by training the children in the school. Eventually they will be able to basically, and he said, basically they could rut like rabbits, with sex, free sex everywhere, but no offspring. That was the key, there would be no offspring. They would play themselves into this new society without knowing whatís going on.
Morality is modified in the lab
Tuesday, 30 March 2010 / BBC.co.uk
(A: I read this before but itís well worth reading again.)
Scientists have shown they can change people's moral judgements by disrupting a specific area of the brain with magnetic pulses. (A: Think of your cell phone when Iím reading this.)
They identified a region of the brain just above and behind the right ear which appears to control morality.
And by using magnetic pulses to block cell activity they impaired volunteers' notion of right and wrong. (A: So simple eh? Mind you, Mr Persinger here in Canada, a professor at Laurentian University, ex-CIA guy because he worked for them for a while with their big military boys Ė Iím sure he still is actually, doing the same thing, doing experiments in neuro science, as they call it Ė used the Koren Helmet years ago, I think in the 60s and 70s they had the Koren Helmet. They could put in on you and give you a trip, very much like an acid trip or a cannabis trip, same thing, by putting little pulses into your brain. OLD STUFF, but they put it into your cell phones of course, and itís so convenient to have a cell phone isnít it? And everyoneís got one, whatís wrong with you? So they say it impairs your judgment of right and wrong.)
The small Massachusetts Institute of Technology (A: Where else folks... the big Pentagon facility.) study appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Lead researcher Dr Liane Young said: "You think of morality as being a really high-level behaviour.
"To be able to apply a magnetic field to a specific brain region and change people's moral judgments is really astonishing." (A: Says this liar. I call him a liar because they knew this years ago, as I said; study after study done with classes of students, one after another, for years, 30-odd years, 40 years. Of course they knew it worked.)
Iíll put these links to the articles up on my site; read them for yourself. From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Debate on Sterilization Wed August 25 and Sat. 28
Author Amanda Craig calls for Two Child Limit for Poor
Gov.GPS Tracking Escalates
Facial Recognition Software--Puts a Name to Every Photograph Posted on Net
Scientists Alter Moral Behaviour by Brain Electrical Impulse Stimulation