June 25, 2010 (#607)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 25, 2010:
Thoughts of "Change" We
Think Ours, Alas,
Though Really via Lackeys of Ruling Class:
"Economics is Theory Based on Plusses &
Rulers Now Bringing Us Carbon-Energy Credits,
To Be Hailed as an Equitable Sustainable Philosophy,
Distribution of Necessities via Global Bureaucracy,
Those Who Own Resources Remain in Control,
With Even More Power Over Stomach and Soul
Of Each Human Being Reduced to Sufferance,
Eternally in Plan of Oligarchic World-Governance,
With Global Charter, High-Sounding Constitution,
A Single-Bodied Control to Be the Solution,
Banker-Funded Marx Expounded the Creed,
"Each According to Ability, According to Need",
If You Noticed the Soviet, Leaders Were Healthy
No Lack of Mod-Cons As Though They Were Wealthy,
Governance Owning Means and Goods of Production
And Distribution Equates Much Human Destruction,
Technocracy Inc. is a Front for This Plan,
Where "Better" I.Q.'s Direct Lives of Man,
Eugenics in Disguise Plans Much Human Bleeding,
Depopulating "Wrong" Kind, See Where it's Leading"
© Alan Watt June 25, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - June 25, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on June 25, 2010. I always suggest at the start of the show, rather than do it throughout the show and really tick you off. I tell you to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and bookmark all the sites I have listed there for future use in case you have trouble with the .com site, which I do now and then. [Official sites listed above.] While you are at it go into the books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale, the few articles that I have for sale. I could do a lot more if I wasn’t doing this but I really don’t have time to do so many things at once. So therefore it’s up to you to keep me going by purchasing these items or donating to me. I don’t ask for money from the advertisers. I have the offers but I don’t take them because it gives me a freer hand to do different things, and say different things, and cross topics in fact, which might go against some advertisers once in a while. The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the air time, their staff and equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you to help me with mine. You can do so by [Order and donation options listed above.] That keeps me going because things are very expensive and I haven’t taken the route of getting a lot of money. Believe you me, this is not a business. It’s a 7 day a week… it’s not even a job. It’s beyond being a job or even a vocation. It’s rather crazy in fact and who knows how long it will last. I might go off and do other things and actually earn some cash while there is still some cash that is worth anything at all but that’s the way it’s going. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address listed above.].
We are going into a planned New World Order society. It’s being directed by the people who have directed it for hundreds of years. The trick is to get the public on their side, without knowing it, for a revolution. That is the trick of all revolutions really, is to use the bulk of the populace for what they think is their revolution, just like you think that the music you hear in your generation is somehow springing out of you and your kind at the time. Nothing is further from the truth. It reminds me of the failed revolution in Germany in 1917. The head of that particular communist organization at the time said that the masses must never really be brought in to the real purpose of communism and the mechanisms of its structure. She said it was supposed to be left for the top echelons only. The masses would be used in their time, at the right time and, really, for a blind force of rage, if you like. I kind of see that happening today. When people on the one hand think that they’ve got their own internet system, somehow it sprung out of their own heads, and it sprang out of the stores and into their laps and they can play with them and it is THEIRS. They have been given a little modicum of freedom for a little while and they’ve been given all the things that would get them IN to it too without questioning anything. Isn’t that always the way? People don’t question technology, where it comes from, who is promoting it, or can there be any other purpose behind it? Well, we’ll touch on some of these things tonight briefly because I don’t prepare my shows. I just talk off the top of my head and that is where I’m going tonight with some of my own thoughts. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. The matrix is a good analogy too, and so were the movie series because they showed you all these different compartments, if you like, or rooms, or areas, or realities, or worlds all within a system, a computerized system, but of course those within the systems didn’t know it. The whole thing was powered by people who didn’t even know that they were actually in tanks getting used like batteries to fuel the whole thing. Their energy was sucked off them; they were given fake lives in a virtual reality which they thought was real. That is much like the world that we are living in today because very few people do question the system they are in. They are born into it. They take things for granted. They take the system that they are born into for granted as just, somehow it got there by itself; it’s just there. You are born into it. Money is there. The system is there. Work is there. Choices for work, hopefully - and they are diminishing too - are there as well. So you have a whole system that you are born into that you did not create; it was preexisting and, obviously, somebody designed it, and somebody updates it.
Who is the Grand Architect for that? Who updates it? Well, we can get clues to things. We can get exposés and history of the big organization that formed to control the monied system for centuries, and have their annual meetings. Then we find many of those particular people involved in creating institutions FOR world governments, like the Royal Institute of International Affairs that came out of the Lord Alfred Milner Group, who actually was a German - many of his workers in fact were German too, or Prussian. They created the Royal Institute of International Affairs and they created the Council on Foreign Relations and then they changed their name in Canada simply to a different name but it’s the same group. They also have a European institute for International Affairs for the whole of the European Union. They have been at it for over a century… working steadily towards a world government.
People will think, well what’s wrong with that? What’s wrong with world government? Number one, who is running it? And what KIND of world government do they want to bring in? When you go into how this system was born from the beginnings of the British Empire and through the British Empire days to the days of Milner, the only people who really, really had an idea on cost for anything at all were those who were involved in creating empires. They had to fund armies. They had to tax citizens of whole nations for their armies. They had to have supply chains, munitions, all of that. They really figured all this out. At a time, too, even a hundred years ago, they thought, well, things are really materially finite to an extent. That’s when the whole idea of running out of things occurred. It occurred to them first, naturally, because they were the real economists, not the phony ones that they turn out in universities today. These guys were running the money supply of most of the world at the time and doing all the accounting for it too. They were also running countries, as property, with all of their citizens down as property and taxable subjects.
It was around the same time as the Milner Group was forming that branches came off for special purposes, specialized branches that would have continuation down through the century to the present time, continuing with their particular special purpose. You’ve got the Fabian Society that was one arm of them. Their job was to control the working people and get them on board primarily with their agenda, and always to be global, for world government. Of course they couched it under the term ‘world governance’. Even Brzezinski on that famous CFR talk that was given and published, for the public to see, mind you – and people don’t think about that – when he supposedly said they were worried at the top about the public being politically aware for the first time. Well that was no coincidence it was shown to the public and given to the public – I’ll try and touch on that later. The Fabian Society wanted governance as well, global governance. Governance is simply a ploy, a tool; to use that term rather than say ‘government’ because obviously they want government. There has to be government to do something, a controlling group at the top but it boils down to material and goods. They also came out and formed other societies.
Brzezinski goes on about the technocrats and explained that technocrats – and so did Professor Carroll Quigley. Technocrats – and really, Brzezinski is one. He goes around the world understand the technique of manipulation, geo-politics and warfare to always attain a strategy, at the end of a strategy, a plan, by having those who are even fighting each other and don’t know they are going to be fighting each other in the future, as a means to an end… to something beyond that, still to come, like dominoes going down one at a time. There is also technocracy itself. In the late 1800s people came out with science. Science was a massive thing and tremendous influence in the 1800s. They though that the sky was the limit. For the first time you had the sci-fi novels of the era talking about going to the moon and doing amazing thing with electricity, which they were really experimenting with; it was new to them to an extent. Tesla was coming out with his amazing inventions. They were having science fairs in the United States and Britain. They saw no end to this whatsoever. They thought it would go on forever.
Then it dawned on them too that everything that they used came out of material and once it was used it was gone. That tied in, again, with the same banking group - Lord Milner’s Group, who included the Rothschilds – that saw that to maintain control they’d have to bring in a new system over the public and have the public participate in this system willingly. And the best way to get the public to go into a system willingly, when actually they will be worse off than before, is to basically bring on a revolution. So they used revolutions for the communist systems as a FAST way to unite a whole bunch of countries together under the same system; it’s a standardization process. Lenin himself said that the dictatorship of the proletariat, which is really over the proletariat, would only last a generation and then it would blend into a system not quite communist and not quite capitalist. Well that’s socialism and that is the system we are in and going under even faster.
I’ve touched before on the different revolutions we’ve had that most folk think nothing of. It’s strange that you can go through them and folk think nothing of them. Apart from all the cultural revolutions we’ve had, like the gender revolution, and the feminist revolution - these were all funded by the same group to start up and to keep going - they had to destroy the family unit, again, because the opposition they were going to have to this coming system was from males primarily, only if the males had something to fight for. Males generally never fight for themselves; they fight for other people. They will go and fight for Colonels and Generals or any guy who tells them to go off and fight, put a uniform on, but they won’t stand up and fight for themselves individually unless they are standing up for their wife and family. So you destroy the family and they won’t stand up and fight. That’s a simple truth of life.
We went through the hippy revolution as well. You know, they tried that before in 1920s Germany. It was the wandering folk that they had at the time. It was a kind of back to nature or rebellion in some aspects against science. At the same time, they liked their musical instruments and things that were made by industry; the same thing with the later hippy era. I’ve gone through some of the documentation on that era, who started it up for instance. It was NOT a spontaneous thing from the public. It involved people in the CIA. It involved people in MI5 in Britain and other agencies across Europe – and they were all ex-military who led the charge, even in the music industry. They set up Laurel Canyon with Zappa and the Frankfort Group. The Frankfort Group was related to the Macy Group as well. The Macy group was brought in from Europe; most of them were refugees from pre-World War II Germany. They were set up in the US in New York. The President gave them full right to create a new system for America and the world and all the funding they would need. That goes right through all education, the type of education you would get, the social engineering education you would have, right up to the present time.
At the same time, they were putting out - come along the 50s and the 60s – they knew they’ve have to separate the young. You always go for the young to train THEM into a new system. Forget the older folk; the Soviets already knew that. With the older folk you couldn’t reeducate them; you simply eliminate them or bypass them and go right to the young. That’s what they did when they brought out what seemed to be a spontaneous pop and then rock-and-roll industry. As I said, Laurel Canyon was set up – and Zappa himself came from a long lineage of high military officers - not just low-down ones - but ones up in the Pentagon, the same as Madonna.
I’ve gone through the documentary – I’ve put the link up and I’ll put it up again tonight – called The Net.
The Net: The Unabomber, LSD and the Internet
It went through, starting with the Unabomber - that’s how this particular investigation started off. It was to do with the Unabomber, a Harvard Professor Ted Kaczynski, a brilliant guy, a mathematician. It was never brought out to the public why he was targeting selective individuals that were all involved in the Macy Group and involved in the Frankfort School and who were involved in this coming… the psycho-social changes area by top authors at Harvard… all members of these groups to change society and the psyche and psychology and the workings of society. And to also push towards cybernetics… if you wonder where your ideas for brain chipping and all that first came from, it goes way back to these groups. I’ll tie this together later and showing you the new system they are going to bring in too, with carbon taxes. It goes all the way back to 1934. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, touching on different things but bringing them together, if you listen closely. I’ve touched on the Royal Institute of International Affairs, and technocracy, an idea which became solidified into what they thought was a science. Technocrats, which are people who work behind the scenes of power, as Quigley said, have more power than Presidents or Prime Ministers; they are not responsible to the public - so they are pretty well invincible - they get the job done and they have no one to answer to, for complaints. But also going into how they give you revolutions in culture that we think are for our benefit and most folk will support them in fact; they are societal and cultural revolutions leading up to the day where we think, well, yeah, we’ve got the net and we can prattle to each other. We forget WHO gave us the net, or maybe why they gave it to us in fact, because they want the whole world on board with this.
It ties in with the whole idea of say debt, for instance. What better way to get people to start making decisions, harsh decisions, about society then for those who HAVE the monied system and control the debt and have it all and dump it in your laps and say, okay, you are all now responsible for it, you make the decisions. Then what do you do? Then you find the little Hitlers getting up amongst you and say, well, I guess half of us have got to die right off the bat. You know, there are too many people, blah, blah, blah. All that will happen. It’s a clever psychological trick to dump something on you and make you think you are now in charge of it. It’s one thing to bitch about those at the top but who are you going to bitch about when it’s you that is in charge of it? You are sharing it, you see. That’s the trick, very clever trick. Most folk can’t get their mind around it. That’s why it works.
Getting back to what I’m talking about, in The Net, the documentary about the Unabomber, and those particular guys he was targeting, and the very fact that they would not go to court and let him speak – they classified him as insane, although he isn’t insane – and dumped him right into the bin. That bypassed the courts rather than give him a say in what was going on. All we know is that he said that there was something about technology that was dangerous for the whole of society. He’d been up in Harvard and he’d mixed with these guys who worked - like the Brockmans and the Brands and all these guys that you will see in that documentary, and the one who wrote the books as well - to change society towards the cybernetic idea of mingling man with science, making him intertwined with it as one.
I’m going back even further to the idea of even carbon taxes coming out of an organization called Technocracy Inc back in 1934 when they came out with the idea of carbon taxes, trading energy taxes. Do you know that HG Wells was a member? You’ll find all the big players, the Huxley’s and so on; they were all perfectly familiar with this whole, very important group that came out of the 1800s thinking that science was going to be the boss of everything. HG Wells in his novel, which of course was based on an agenda to come, he’s going right through the whole future in it in fact. He wrote that in 1933. He has the money system at the end, and that’s from 2034 onwards, that’s the end, when they achieved this perfect society, with the right amount of people to inhabit it; that’s depopulating by about 95%. They have instead of money, they swap energy credits. That’s a coincidence of course to everything that’s happening today, isn’t it? It’s got to be, right? Yeah, sure.
Getting back again to how they set up the whole revolutionary idea, to destroy the old culture and make way for the new. That’s what you always do. You destroy that which is, to make way for that which will be. That’s what they say at the top. John Brockman was sent out FROM the military, when he came out, as an instant investment banker. his job was to make pop stars out of scientists and elevate them to the top, an expert society, you see. Sure enough, you see all these experts in the newspapers guiding you and telling you how to live, how to have sex, and all the rest of it. That’s all part of it. He also worked with Stewart Brand. Brand, a very interesting family; it goes way back. You’ll see that name cropping up all the time, even the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Milner Group. Stewart Brand gave you the term ‘personal computer’ back in the 60s. He was working on it then, supposedly as they are all popping LSD and going around with the Grateful Dead, getting them all high, getting them all to try this new reality, break away from the old. He came out with the Whole Earth Catalog as well.
They toured with the Grateful Dead and it’s called ‘The Experiment’. They went around just dishing out bags of LSD all over the place to get the whole movement started. Two ex-military guys, again. They also worked with the inventor of the strobe. They were given the facilities of the Air Force, to use a big hangar there for experiments under LSD with strobe lighting, which they later brought in to what they created later in the 70s at the discos. MIND ALTERING EXPERIENCES is what they were in to. It was to, again, destroy what was left of the old system. Free love, sex, the same stuff that HG Wells talked about in the late 1800s; they’d have to bring in a system of free love, but no children. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and just tying up a few things which you might think are distant from each other but it’s not. Actually, they all come from the same hub, the hub that controls the world and directs where we are all going. And it has done your whole life and your parents and grandparents too. I’ll put the links for The Net back up on my site at the end of the show. So see The Net: The Unabomber, LSD and the Internet and you’ll get an idea of what I’m talking about, at least for that part of it, that era of it.
I’m also talking about prior to that because George Bernard Shaw, who was a founding member of the Fabian Society - along with the Webbs and others, and Wells himself, of course. Shaw wrote Man and Superman. See, they are all eugenicists and still are. Those at the top of the technocracy believe that those who will come through at the end, after this, into the new technological society, are 5% of the people, who happen to be themselves of course. That’s always been their objective. He wrote Man and Superman and in there he mentions, he gives you instances in fact, that the person who couldn’t understand how even an automobile worked, for instance, mechanics, or electronics, those who could not grasp these things would have to be eliminated. They couldn’t be allowed through into this new age. So it would only be those with scientific mindsets who would come through it, those who could grasp this and be of use to them. In fact he said that, everyone would have to come to us and ask why we should justify allowing them to live. In other words, what use would you be to them?
That’s also why you’ll find that when Lenin took over really the whole communist party and they got what they wanted at least for Russia, Trotsky had a bit of a rift with him. Trotsky couldn’t understand – and he said in his own writings – why so many British aristocrats were coming over and being given guided tours of the new system, which they called ‘the experiment.’ These people were the big boys from the Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Later on in the 20s it was the CFR members going over there, top members, again, multi-millionaires, all the ones who run your foundations today, the big foundations, the parallel government. They were given first-hand privileges to walk around and get shown how it really was. You see, it was kind of a blueprint, a microcosm, and a laboratory for the big society to come, which actually is a reduced society. The Russians killed off an awful lot of people, millions and millions of people whom they decided could never adjust into their new system.
The technocrats came out, again, from the Fabian Society as a front for the same group talking about your usefulness to society and that matter was finite. Basically they arranged a system and a tuition course in the 1930s which is still used today. They’ve got branches in British Columbia. There is one in the States. They have one in England and ones in Europe. Their society is worldwide, teaching them that to come into a new society you will be trading credits, exactly as HG Wells said they would be back in 1933. How they worked it at the time was that energy would be used into carbon and this is what the whole carbon trading system of today is all about and that’s where it all came from. So it’s not going to be a free and equitable means of trading and surviving. It means that those who have the most at the moment, those who have always run the system, will be in charge of all the world’s resources. Don’t forget that the Milner Group and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation with the Rothschilds and all the big world bankers as members, were sending emissaries across the world to take control of all the world’s resources BACK then, over 100 years ago. That was Cecil Rhodes’ job, to go over to South Africa and grab all the land for the gold and the diamonds and the resources. And it has never stopped today. I noticed, by the way, that Nathan Rothschild has just started another company up to start more worldwide mining for all kinds of things across the world, in precious metals and other kinds of metals, all those things which you will need in this up-and-coming system where you will be trading energy credits, or carbon credits as they want to call them now.
What you are living through is a culmination of a very, very, very old plan. People right now are getting on board with it thinking that they are fighting something, but they are actually on board with the system. There has never been so many very good exposés written about the farce of money as is coming out today. I’ve got about three excellent articles today that came out about the farce of money and the cons of money and Brzezinski admitting it too. And even the global governance, as Brzezinski said, is a cover to a poor fallacy for government, global government and so on. Great exposés, but why do you think they are out now? Of course money has always been a farce. It’s because those who own all the resources also give you the money system, as the Rothschilds have always done and others like them. They will be in charge of all the resources for the coming age. So as long as they are in charge of it, it doesn’t matter what you are swapping at the bottom, they will have a lot more goods in reality, real goods, than you will ever, ever imagine. Remember what Rothschild said? He says, give me control of the nation’s money - he just as well had said the nation’s carbon credits - and I care not who rules… because he is still the boss.
What they are convincing people of today, now, is that there are too many people and you are the problem. Of course one of their branches, the Club of Rome, came out and said that in their own book, The First Global Revolution. Man is the enemy of the planet, there are too many people, and so on and so on and so on. I’ve been through all of that before many times and many other articles as well that have come out recently over the last few years. Stepping up until YOU get the message that we’re all in it together, coupled by the complete farce of the war on terror, which is a war OF terror to really upset everybody across the planet and to really tick them off to get you ready for revolution and you will be guided with your leaders to lead you into the new system. You all go in saying, yeah, yeah, it’s ours… but it won’t be yours at all.
Academia is heavily involved with the Military-Industrial Complex, always has been. They are guiding your thoughts. They are guiding your actions. They are guiding the whole idea of the new system, the new economy. They get your tax money all the time to work on projects that the Pentagon gives them on all of these strategies. The Pentagon isn’t all about bombs, you know, and bullets. It has way more to do with societal control and economic warfare of all kinds. Here is an article, a typical article.
Nat’l Academy of Sciences Tells Citizen-Lobbyists:
First Priority is Economy-Wide Carbon Price
06/23/2010 by James Handley / carbontax.org
On Monday, Dr. Laurie Geller, director of the National Academy of Sciences’ new blue-ribbon climate change report, briefed the Citizens’ Climate Lobby’s National Conference, kicking off CCL’s Washington lobby week. (Alan: So they are full-time lobbyists, you see.)
Part I of NAS’s report stresses the strong evidence and broad scientific consensus that Earth’s surface is warming due to human-caused fossil fuel burning. NAS recommends further research on managing impacts on ecosystems, food production, public health and climate policy. (A: Do you understand, that’s your population control, everything all rolled into one, and what each individual… public health is what each individual is worth to the state to keep you going; should they treat you or let you die, etc.)
Part II, “Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change” calls for immediate, urgent action; its top recommendation is to “Adopt an economy-wide carbon pricing system.” (A: This is all across the world. This stuff is coming out all over the place.) It also urges additional clean energy R&D, research into how behavior and technology interact (A: Again, that’s technocracy.) and incentives for low greenhouse gas energy technologies.
Part III, on adaptation, suggests responses to the inevitable consequences of climate change already in motion. Recommendations include: “develop hot weather early warning systems” as Philadelphia has done, and “Alaska: Retreat from the Coast” (A: “Retreat from the coast…”) beginning the process of relocation from areas where thawing and erosion (A: They’re talking about sea erosion, by the way.) are rendering present settlements untenable. (A: Of course they’re using this whole thing down there in the Gulf for that right now, aren’t they? They were doing it before that spill in the Gulf with, Oh my God, the coastline in eroding, they keep telling you.)
Remember, Agenda 21 says you will not be living on the coastlines, across the world. They don’t want anyone across the world living on the coastlines. But if you really want really good information on this, I’ll give you a link for a site at the end of the show. This site goes into a lot of the history that I’ve just been talking about. Of course, it doesn’t connect the music industry, Brockman, the Unabomber, and so on, or the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, the Milner Group becoming the Royal Institute of International Affairs all working on the same agenda. It doesn’t tie them into it but it has a good handle on at least some of the founders.
As I say, 1934 the founder actually said this,
“Energy Certificates are issued individually to every adult of the entire population… The record of one’s income and its rate of expenditure is kept by the Distribution Sequence, (A: That’s like an organization; that’s the head office.) so that it is a simple matter at any time for the Distribution Sequence to ascertain the state of a given customer’s balance... When making purchases of either goods or services an individual surrenders the Energy Certificates properly identified and signed.
“The significance of this, from the point of view of knowledge of what is going on in the social system, and of social control, can best be appreciated when one surveys the whole system in perspective. First, one single organization is manning and operating the whole social mechanism. (A: ONE system, ONE organization, right, ONE plutocracy is managing the production and distribution of all wealth and goods, goods and services. Remember George Orwell said that? He says, you’ll know when tyranny is there because they will own the means of production and the distribution of all food, goods and services. This is what’s been pushed here in this particular article in 1934, of the founder of the main organization, that is worldwide, lots of your politicians are members of it to bring in the same system. He goes on to say…) The same organization not only produces but also distributes all goods and services.
“With this information clearing continuously to a central headquarters we have a case exactly analogous to the control panel of a power plant, or the bridge of an ocean liner…” [Technocracy Study Course, Hubbert & Scott, p. 238-239] (A: This course is still available today because, you see, it’s still going today. As I’ve said, lots of your politicians are all members, and of course they’ve got their funding from the usual foundations, and have from the beginning.)
When you go to the top of this article, it says here… and it’s a very good article.
Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy?
By Patrick Wood, Editor / augustreview.com / January 26, 2010
Critics who think that the U.S. dollar will be replaced by some new global currency are perhaps thinking too small.
On the world horizon looms a new global currency that could replace all paper currencies and the economic system upon which they are based.
The new currency, simply called Carbon Currency, is designed to support a revolutionary new economic system based on energy (production, and consumption), instead of price. (A: What do you think your Smart Meters are all about? Hmm?) Our current price-based economic system and its related currencies that have supported capitalism, socialism, fascism and communism, is being herded to the slaughterhouse in order to make way for a new carbon-based world. (A: But guess what folks? The folks that gave you all those systems are still running it.)
It is plainly evident that the world is laboring under a dying system of price-based economics as evidenced by the rapid decline of paper currencies. The era of fiat (irredeemable paper currency) was introduced in 1971 when President Richard Nixon decoupled the U.S. dollar from gold. Because the dollar-turned-fiat was the world’s primary reserve asset, all other currencies eventually followed suit, leaving us today with a global sea of paper that is increasingly undesired, unstable, unusable. (A: And it’s meant to be, folks. You see, it’s TIME to bring in the new system. That’s why this is all happening. That’s why they had the crash when they wanted it. They could have kept the bubbles going forever because that’s what it was always based upon, the whole stock market and the currencies, enthusiasm… and fast talkers.)
The deathly economic state of today’s world is a direct reflection of the sum of its sick and dying currencies, but this could soon change.
Forces are already at work to position a new Carbon Currency as the ultimate solution to global calls for poverty reduction, population control, environmental control, global warming, energy allocation and blanket distribution of economic wealth. (A: What are we really doing right now under this, we’re all in it together, IMF, World Bank idea? We are redistributing our tax money across the planet. That was also a tenet of communism. Communism, as I said, was created by the same bankers that had already ruled the Western world, as a big experiment, for what’s coming now. You see how it all ties together?)
Unfortunately for individual people living in this new system, it will also require authoritarian and centralized control over all aspects of life, from cradle to grave.
What is Carbon Currency and how does it work? In a nutshell, Carbon Currency will be based on the regular allocation of available energy to the people of the world. If not used within a period of time, the Currency will expire (like monthly minutes on your cell phone plan) (A: Remember, I’ve read Bertrand Russell to you and he said in one of his books, people will be issued credits from a government which you can’t save up and on Monday they will start again with the same amount in it. And they will used as a form of social control because you must have these credits to pay for your rent. Everything will be rental eventually. You’ll pay your bills with it, buy your food with it, and if you buck the system they will use social disapproval, withdraw your credits that week or that month or maybe two or three or six months to punish you. It is used as punishment too, you see. He wrote that one in a particular book back in the 1940s.) so that the same people can receive a new allocation based on new energy production quotas for the next period.
Because the energy supply chain is already dominated by the global elite, setting energy production quotas will limit the amount of Carbon Currency in circulation at any one time. It will also naturally limit manufacturing, food production and people movement. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix and tying up some ends to show people what’s been happening all their lives and where these big movements and where their big thoughts, really, that become the opinions of people actually came from. We are guided along ALL paths, especially through academia and those who go through universities because they become great workers towards all this because they never question the wrongness of anything that comes from their superiors. It is said with authority, just like I read yesterday from Bertrand Russell.
This article “Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy?” goes through the history of technocracy, a bit obscure in some places. I’ve tied in more tonight in other areas of it to show you where it all came from.
Philosophically, Technocracy found it roots in the scientific autocracy of Henri de Saint-Simon (1760-1825) and in the positivism of Auguste Comte (1798-1857), the father of the social sciences. (A: Social sciences is very important for all this. Most revolutions go through the social… they are quiet, bloodless. They are changes in culture; that’s what they are.) Positivism elevated science and the scientific method above metaphysical revelation. Technocrats embraced positivism because they believed that social progress was possible only through science and technology. (A: And therefore, only those who understood it should be the ones who come through to the new age.) [Schunk, Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 5th, 315]
The social movement of Technocracy, with its energy-based accounting system, can be traced back to the 1930’s (A: The movement came out openly. They were hidden before that, through Milner and all the other ones who already ruled the world’s resources.) when an obscure group of engineers and scientists offered it as a solution to the Great Depression.
The principal scientist behind Technocracy was M. King Hubbert, a young geoscientist who would later (in 1948-1956) invent the now-famous Peak Oil Theory, also known as the Hubbert Peak Theory. (A: That’s got you all so crazy.) Hubbert stated that the discovery of new energy reserves and their production would be outstripped by usage, thereby eventually causing economic and social havoc. Many modern followers of Peak Oil Theory believe that the 2007-2009 global recession was exacerbated in part by record oil prices that reflected validity of the theory. (A: It goes through a bit of the history of him and the universities he went through and so on, funded, again, by the Rockefeller Foundation.)
Hubbert received all of his higher education at the University of Chicago, graduating with a PhD in 1937, and later taught geophysics at Columbia University. He was highly acclaimed throughout his career, receiving many honors such as the Rockefeller Public Service Award in 1977. (A: Very interesting, he was given a Rockefeller Public Service Award for really pushing this stuff he was told to push. These guys are front men, folks. They all are.)
In 1933, Hubbert and Howard Scott formed an organization called Technocracy, Inc. (A: If you look that up you’ll find departments in every country. They’ve got an awful lot of communiqués with government officials, in every country as well.) (A: They explain what it means…) Technocracy is derived from the Greek words “techne” meaning skill and “kratos”, meaning rule. Thus, it is government by skilled engineers, scientists and technicians as opposed to elected officials. It was opposed to all other forms of government, including communism, socialism and fascism, all of which function with a price-based economy.
As founders of the organization and political movement called Technocracy, Inc., Hubbert and Scott also co-authored Technocracy Study Course in 1934. This book serves as the (A: And you can see their Study Course from 1934, still used as the…) “bible” of Technocracy and is the root document to which most all modern technocratic thinking can be traced.
They go on about the need to bring down the old system, how to bring in the new system, and that money itself was simply obsolete already back in their day. They knew it was a con because their masters were the guys who ran the money… and they obeyed their masters. And the masters want to bring in a new system now that the masters own all the resources of the world. That’s what really matters, isn’t it? Resources, food, and oil, all energy resources… that’s what’s important. You can call it whatever you want, carbon credits, energy credits; they already did back in the 30s and you are living through it today. Of course they sell it to you as a new age of equality and all that kind of stuff as they distribute the wealth. But that’s all bunkum folks because they want to bring down the population to those who should stay alive and breed, if you read all their other documents as well.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Transcribed by Diana
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"