June 21, 2010 (#603)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 21, 2010:

Fabian Technique Slow, No Sudden Storm,
Introduce -- They Adapt to New Norm:

"Censorship of Internet is Now the Norm,
The Next Step is About to Be Born,
The Law on Preventing Homegrown Terror
Will Be Stretched Like Elastic Flexor
To Include Counter-Revolutionaries Who
Are Sovereignists and Patriots Like You,
You See, The Revolution Over the Years
Was Step-by-Step, Allaying the Fears,
National Flags Flapped, Sovereign Terms Used,
Cloaking Revolution, Made Most Confused,
As Watchers Attacked Parts They Recognized,
Rest of Agenda went Ignored, Surprised
They Wake Up in a Nation that's Sovietized,
List of Laws and Agencies Assaults the Eyes"
© Alan Watt June 21, 2010

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - June 21, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


cuttingthroughthematrix.com
alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca

mirror site:
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu


Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check Ė in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on June 21, 2010.  For the newcomers, I always suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site.  Youíll find hundreds of talks to download that I have given over the years and while you are there, bookmark the other sites I have listed up there because I do get problems with the main site once in a while.  If you have these other sites bookmarked you can always get the latest shows and download them for free, hopefully, until they get us off the air all together because as you know, the censorship is coming, they have passed all their laws.  Now it is a matter of reinterpreting the laws to suit themselves and go after individuals that are causing any kind of problems.  Thatís really the intention of the whole thing in the first place.  So bookmark them for future use.  While you are there, go into the items for sale, the books, CDs and DVDs.  These are different books than you will buy about so called conspiracies and so on. 

 

The thing is, you see, the whole world is one big conspiracy.  Itís called, basically the convolutions of reality.  Itís the way itís presented to you that is really is a conspiracy and how it is really reinforced by your training, your education and the media.  It keeps us in a sort of land of between fantasy and semi-reality, but never in complete reality.  We are managed in a scientific manner.  What else would you do with all the scientific toys they have today and their means of communication?  Naturally itís to do with control.  Itís always been about control and how the few live off of the many and they live very, very well indeed.  So purchase the books.  I show you some of the tricks that they use, including the language itself.  I explain the symbolism that is always all around you that they tend to laugh at when you point it out to them.  After all, why do you have obelisks sticking out all over the place?  Why do you have obelisks on the logos of the biggest corporations in the world, and pyramids and so on?  There is more to it than meets the eye obviously.  So I try to explain this to you to show you the conology of the ruling elite, and there has always been a ruling elite.  There has always been a dominant minority, as Aldous Huxley said himself. 

 

If you want to purchase any of these items or donate to me, [ordering and donation options listed above].  You can wire to me or you can send cash.  Cash is cheaper.  So far they are still accepting cash here even though the European cash is plummeting.  Mind you, so is the dollar.  Itís hyperinflation coming in.  Food has actually doubled in the last few years, and people donít notice it.  Please send me donations; thatís really what keeps me ticking over.  I donít use advertisers.  They donít pay me.  They have all offered of course, and keep offering to pay me, but Iíd have to bring them on as guests and give you, really, what are one hour shows of advertising in reality.  I prefer to do it this way.  The ads on this show are paid by advertisers right to RBN to pay for the air time.  It pays for their staff, equipment, and their bills. So itís up to you to help me keep paying mine.  Itís always the same few folk who do it over and over again.  That is the way of the world in the me-generation, but thatís just the way it is.  Once in a while you get a new person coming in, and you donít have to send an awful lot of an amount of money either for donation, remember.  Think of the next time you buy that bag of chips, just send it off in a donation instead; the cash, not the chips.  For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. 

 

We are really coming through the big changes.  Weíve always known they were coming but now they are actually legislating them into law.  We are so used to it, itís not even a shock to us when they to it because we get trained up until this point to accept it.  I'll be back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.  Back in the early 1900s youíll find lots of books were printed, some fictional, some nonfictional, along the theme of world depopulation on behalf of the big ruling club that ran the likes of Britain mainly, the UK. 

 

HG Well is one of the propagandists for them.  He wrote a lot of fiction and nonfiction along these particular lines of elitism and eugenics and the right of the fit to rule the lesser.  One of the novels that he wrote was Ė it was a semi-novel in a sense.  It was really a plan.  I was called A Modern Utopia.  He leads the reader through a journey into the future as it would be, once all this had been done, all the different parts of the accomplishments of getting the public to accept it, bringing the populations down. He even suggested in the book, we donít just kill them off, although there were mandatory abortions.  We donít just kill them off, we sterilize them, itís more humane and they gradually, simply die off, all the useless type genes, the ones who didnít quite make the grade.  He takes you through a journey across the world in their modern utopia.  Remember, that was the early 1900s.  Part of the theme then was always, as it is today, oh, if we donít do this then too many of the wrong people will breed out of existence all those who have the right to rule, and take all the resources from that few that really deemed it their world, being the better sorts and all that kind of stuff, the better types.  That was only one book of many.  He belonged to the Fabian Society.  He was a spokesman and propagandist for the Fabian Society and the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  These organizations still work today, heavily in the front of the fight for their particular type of utopia.  They help back big organizations like Planned Parenthood which is, again, eugenics.  Thatís why they put them in all the poor neighborhoods; kill off all those that are the wrong type, as they keep telling us. 

 

Weíve had many exposťs on the same kind of thing.  There are so many you could go on all night about them, with different quotes from different people, the very important people Ė at least they are important as far as being up in positions of high power.  They are saying all the same things over and over again.  Weíve had it coming out of the UN ad nauseam since the day it was born.  Actually it came out of the League of Nations that was the precursor to the UN before the UN was born.  The same thing; they had a department of population at that time.  They actually mean population control. 

 

Meanwhile, you had other advocates saying, what utter nonsense because the world has never had what weíd call its full capacity in history ever, EVER.  We donít realize too, that even the world in which we live, the systems in this world in which we live are constrained systems where we are really lumped in into cities.  Most folk now live in big, overcrowded cities where they even passed laws as far back as in the 60s.  They were not to build any more buildings outwards, in the city edges.  They could only rebuild on previously existing sites.  So knock one down, build up another and so on, guaranteeing they would be overflowing because massive immigration was increased every year right up to the present time in most of these countries to give the impression that we are overcrowded.  Well you certainlyÖ You could be living in the middle of a brand new planet and cram a few billion people into one cage on a tiny portion of the planet and yes, that cage would be overcrowded.  So itís the same sort of analogy.  You are stuck into the cities, the gates to immigration are open wide Ė the reason for this being, they want us all to believe that weíre all in it together.  See, weíve got to share the problem of the entire planet. 

 

And look around the entire planet.  When we used to see starving in Africa and different places, many other organizations came out and said, the problem wasnít just the fact that the East and West were playing war games and funding different tribes to fight each other Ė which was part of it for sure, and no farming gets done during these periods Ė but the main problem was there werenít enough people living on the land to farm and feed themselves.  There were NOT ENOUGH people on those areas and most of that flows from government policy as well.  We saw the same thing in Ethiopia a few years ago.  We saw the farce of the Live Aid concert; they never told you the rest of the story.  A lot of the money that went to do with the air drops of food, they were scattering this stuff in a particular trail along a desert path and ľ million of the people died trying to get to this food, which is exactly what the government of Ethiopia wanted because it was an ethnic cleansing move.  Lots of the land now is vacant.  There are also those up in the Wildlife Fund areas Ė again, all eugenicists at the top of it all, just donít want ordinary folk living at all Ė who laud and approve of this kind of thing because itís all part of the agenda.  They want to return the world to some kind of primal state so that they and their offspring, you know, the superior genes, will have a big, wide open world to romp about in and play and do their shooting and hunting, as wealthy elites always do. 

 

In the meantime, itís convincing us, all the rest of you who are not up there partying at the big time, that you must be sterilized; we must bring down the populations.  And a war has been waged upon everyone, long before any of you out there were born, to destroy the very basic fabric of society that gave them cohesion with each other, which gave them the right to stand up together cohesively and fight something.  They want to basically eliminate them right down to the family unit.  The old religions, too, are destroyed because whether you believe in them or not doesnít matter.  Itís the fact they gave you a sense of what was right and wrong to make a society function without chaos.  No incest, no pedophilia, no this, no that, etc, etc.  And everyone knew the rules.  You didnít have to go to churches to know the rules.  Everyone knew the rules and you dealt with the problems locally.  You didnít need police; the locals dealt with any of the big problems that came along.  We didnít have all the different government departments of welfare, childrenís aid, and various other organizations that now storm homes and come in and do their thing and off they go.  We didnít have a system a long time ago Ė not that long ago actually Ė where you have pedophiles walking out the doors in court and nothing happening to them.  It didnít happen.  You didnít have all the raping going on either.  You didnít have all the venereal disease and you didnít have a malfunctioning society because everything that was set in society is a defense mechanism to make that society survive, right down to the family unit.  Without the family unit there is no survival.  People cannot bond and people cannot have offspring and they certainly canít STAY together to have the offspring for very long because theyíve been programmed.

 

Iíve given you so many shows and links before to do with this particular type of attack and how it was orchestrated, right down to the guys like Huxley, Bertrand Russell and many, many, many more, talking about introducingÖ It wasnít just sex education to very young children and prepubertal children.  It was to advocate basically, or start off an obsession with it in prepubertal stages, which become fixations.  Do you understand that things that happen to you in childhood, in particular drive areas Ė very important areas Ė things that will happen to you become imprinted in your brain forever.  And like any drive, any drive can be exploited and become an addiction.  Any drive whatsoever, even if itís the need for food can be exploited by those who know how to do so and you become an addict to food and you become obese and so on.  The same goes with sex.  They know this and they discussed it as early as the 1900s; actually before that, HG Wells was promoting Ďfree loveí for this very reason, to destroy the family unit, in the late 1800s!

 

We donít realize that everything that is happening today is the end product of a long, long war.  A long battle because the things that held society together were looked at by those who make wars and they looked upon an enemy - that was the family unit and society in general with common cultures - and they thought, how to we destroy each part of this because thatís what makes these people function, thatís what makes them stand up and say, no, we are not having it.  And they attacked it ALL one piece, by one piece, by one piece.  We now have a society where no one can stand up for themselves.  They canít stand up cohesively to fight anything whatsoever.  They watch government laws after laws after laws being pulled out and implemented one after another.  And yes, they complain about it but they donít know what to do about it because there is not enough drive and cohesiveness amongst them to simply get so indignant that they will say, no, we are not having it.  And government rolls ahead; it knows it has no opposition today.

 

The other side of it too, is that they have non governmental organizations, THOUSANDS of them, all funded Ė Iíve gone through the history of many of them before Ė under the umbrella of the United Nations via the big foundations that really run the world.  Professor Carroll Quigley went through this technique of the big foundations, the PARALLEL GOVERNMENT, the Council on Foreign Relations, and named them all.  So did The Anglo-American Establishment plus the other book that exposed what they were up to.  It was, Foundations:  Their Power and Influence Ė a must read it is, a MUST READ.  But theyíve won.  Itís over.  That part is all over.  I'll be back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  Iím Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  As Iíve said, most of that plan, really, has been accomplished.  They have gone step by step, year after year introducing more of this into the schools, to prepubertal children.  Iíve read the articles from the United Nations and UNESCO thatís promoting all this stuff.  Itís now parts of curriculum.  You turn on a television set and you wonder what you are looking at when you see people simulating sex on television; they call it dancing with Much-Music.  But thatís all it is, itís gone down to the bottom and that is standard fare todayÖ so that maybe two or three generations will sit and watch that together and I wonder if it makes any one of them feel uncomfortable, because itís standard fare today.  Quite something.  Itís even more so to read the books by scientists from a hundred years ago saying they would bring this in, this very system inÖ how to use primitivism and bring it into society to destroy the societies that they said would HAVE to be destroyed to rule and dominate them and bring in the scientifically designed society.  Itís all there.  Itís normal standard fare today. 

 

The non-governmental organizations, the Ďthousand points of lightí for the main ones and the foundations that run the parallel government are always on the go.  As I say, Carroll Quigley went through a lot of that, how they set up these fronts, these big foundations, the richest foundations on the planet, incredible wealth, tax-free foundations that had a free hand to decide where their money goes.  What they also did was set up their own NGOs and then fund them for political purposes and to change society from within, through pressure, then lobbying governments as well.  You cannot fight that kind of system.  See, everything in this system runs on money and those who have the money rule everything.  Iím talking about the international bankers, of course.  MPs, politicians, Presidents, and Prime Ministers must go cap-in-hand to borrow money from the big international bankers.  Of course, there are always demands that go along with it as far as repayments go.  Thatís why Rothschild said, give me the charge of the nationís money and I care not who runs it, because he knew himself that HE would run it, technically.  Everything runs on the premise of money.  The guy with the money makes the rules.  Simple. 

 

There is an article from the UK Column on non-governmental organizations and this is part 2 on One World Government.  It saysÖ

 

Abusing the System Through

NGOs (Alan:  non governmental organizations) and CSOs

One World Governance - Part 2 / Maryetta Ables / ukcolumn.org

 

Everyone knows what a lobbyist is, but do you know what an "Adviser" is in Washington, D.C.?

 

No matter whom we elect, no matter the person or party, if we don't shine the light on who really is writing policy, we are in for a rude awakening. The acronym NGO stands for Non-Governmental Organization. While NGOs go back to the early 1900s, the phrase "non-governmental organization" came into its current use with the United Nations Organization in 1945. It is in Article 71 of Chapter 10 of the United Nations Charter. It established a consultative role for organizations which are neither governments nor member states. There is a conscious effort to replace the term NGO with a more politically-correct term -- Civil Society Organization or CSO.  (A:  Thatís the term that they are trying to use at the moment to make you think itís got official backing.  Itís like the Federal Reserve, it isnít federal at all; itís to give you the idea that it is part of your government system, which technically it is really.) 

 

There is a major difference:

 

∑ NGO may apply to any non-profit organization.

 

∑ CSO designation applies only to those NGOs that are accredited by the United Nations and hold "consultative status" through The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (A:  The link is in here for the Economic and Social Council.  By the way, Iíll put all these links up on my site at the end of the show on my web sites.)

 

(For-profit companies and organizations can also be accredited, but we are only writing of NGOs here.)

 

According to Our Global Neighborhood, (A:  Remember the book, Our Global Neighborhood, that was from the United Nations.) the official report of the UN-funded Commission on Global Governance, published in 1995, there were 28,900 international NGOs worldwide and hundreds of thousands of national NGOs. As of late 1994, only 980 were officially "accredited" by the UN's Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). However, these 980 accredited NGOs are affiliated with tens of thousands more NGOs in virtually every nation on earth. By virtue of their affiliation with accredited NGOs, these NGOs constitute what the UN describes as CSOs.  (A:  They are bigger than all your governments put together across the planet.)

 

Non UN-accredited NGOs are described by globalists as "populist organizations" and the globalist feel that these organizations can upset and even destroy the work of decades of their deliberations in a short period of time. That is the potential of the ďTea PartyĒ grass roots movement currently on the rise in the United States.

 

Here is some background to aid in understanding CSOs. There are two levels of accreditation:

 

∑ Accreditation by ECOSOC confers what is called ďconsultativeĒ status.

 

∑ Accreditation by a subsidiary organization of ECOSOC authorizes ďobserverĒ status at a specific UN conference or event.

 

For a current list and locations of CSOs with consultative status go to: http://esango.un.org/irene/index.html

 

(A:  Nobody votes for these folks, folks.  I'll be back with more after this break.)

 

Hi folks.  Iím Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  I got cut off there and Iíve been getting that a lot lately, from interference from who knows where but itís happening more and more frequently.  And yes, they do play games with you too; Iím so used to it.  Sometimes I can be talking on the phone and itís quiet, certain things, topics that I mention, as soon as I mention them, boom, I get cut off.  Thatís happening more and more today.  I just got cut off again, on air.  I used to have that too, even back in 1998 when I was on other shows.  They donít like certain topics. 

 

However, getting back to the non-governmental organizations that have all this massive funding and massive power run by the Rockefellers and big foundations.  It says hereÖ

 

An example of the power of ďobserverĒ status was seen at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janiero. (A:  That was with Maurice Strong.)  Of the more than 8,000 NGOs represented at the NGO Forum held the week before the Earth Summit, 1,400 NGOs were accredited as "observers.

 

"NGOs with ďconsultativeĒ and ďobserverĒ status are responsible for the following:

 

∑ Development of the global agenda, i.e., Agenda 21. (A:  Öfor the United Nations.)

 

∑ Enactment of the policies at the international level.

 

∑ Converting international policy into national laws and regulations.

 

∑ Implementing the new policies, laws, and regulations on the ground.

 

(A:  They must go intoÖ See, they actually create treaties and then they go around to every government and they just automatically sign on these treaties, all bypass the general public.  Thereís no voting for these NGOs.  They are just THERE, you see, big lobbying NGOs.)

 

History

 

The modern NGO story begins with the creation of the United Nations. One month after the UN Charter went into force, Julian Huxley signed the document that created the United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, the well-known UNESCO.  (A:  He also became the first CEO of it.  Iíve read articles from his books on UNESCO where he said everything Iíve mentioned earlier about introducing sex into schools on an ever-increasing basis until basically the children would be having so many partners before they were old enough to know what they were doing that theyíd never bond to any individual thereafter.  That was part of the plan.  In fact, what he said was, we shall eventually get them to accept sterilization so they can have as much promiscuity as they wish, the only rule being that they do not have any outcome fromÖ the meetings, you might say.)

Two years later, the same Julian Huxley was instrumental in creating the International Union for the Conservation of Nature or IUCN. The IUCN consolidated the work of the British Fauna and Flora Preservation Society with other conservation groups that worked throughout the British Empire and aligned its work with the activities of UNESCO.

 

(For a brief discussion of the nature of NGO leaders, see: http://sovereignty.net/p/ngo/ngotut.htm )

 

To increase funding for its work, the IUCN created another, more public organization called the World Wildlife Fund or WWF in 1961. It was headed by Prince Philip.  (A:  Whoís just lately, again, came out with another one of his same statements that weíve got to depopulate the planet.)

 

During the 1960s, the IUCN lobbied the UN General Assembly to create a new status for NGOs.  Resolution 1296, adopted in 1968, grants "consultative" status to NGOs. (A:  Who do they consult with?  They consult with governments.  They dictate to governments.)  The IUCN is accredited with six UN organizations.  In 1982, the IUCN and WWF worked together to create still another NGO called the World Resources Institute (WRI). Russell Train, then-President of the WWF-USA, amassed $25 million in grants to create the World Resources Institute or WRI. He selected Gustave Speth, co-founder of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) as its first President. This triumvirate, consisting of the IUCN, WWF and WRI, is the driving force behind the rise of NGO influence at the UN and around the world.  (A:  Itís a parallel government, you see.)

 

The IUCN's current membership includes: 92 international NGOs; 753 national NGOs; 29 affiliates; 80 state agencies; 93 government agencies with state members; and 23 government agencies without state members.

 

The U.S. State Department contributes more than $1 million per year to this NGO.  (A:  So yep, your government money is also funding these PRIVATE non-governmental organizations that are also funded by the big tax-free foundations.  Itís just astonishing.  The money they are raking in is astonishing.)

 

President Clinton issued Executive Order #12986 which grants this NGO certain diplomatic "privileges and immunities."  WWF funding in the USA is interesting. The WWF reported 1995 income in the USA to be $138,874,116 and assets at $62,558,896. In recent years the WWFís take increased:

 

∑ In 2003 it was $370,245,000 (A:  This is millions of dollars.)

∑ In 2004 it was $468,889,000

∑ In 2005 it was $499,629,000

∑ In 2006 it was $549,827,000

∑ In 2007 it was $663,193,000

∑ That totals $2,551,783,000 (A:  Billions!)

 

WWFís take in 2008 was not quite as good. They switched their accounting to Euros, in place of dollars and took in Ä447,251,000. Thatís roughly $584,000,000.  Their total income since 2003 is just over $3.1 billion (this does not include 2009).  (A:  So itís got a list of how much they rake in, these little tin can wavingÖ you know, at the door.  Thatís what you think of when you see them.  You think of one of these non-governmental organizations as guys who go around collecting money in tin cans in the doors.  No.  These guys are run by the multi-trillionaires at the top, who run the foundations, but they also want money from you too, so they can pass laws upon you, even though you donít elect them.  Thatís how they bypass democracy.  They have been doing that in every area with these NGOs for an awful, awful long time.)

 

Iíve said from the beginning, the internet would only last a certain amount of time.  It will keep going of course, with the format of the mainstream being on it; lots of pornography to make sure most folk keep going into it because apparently folk really love the stuff.  However, there will be no dissenting voices allowed in the internet.  This is from Fox News January 13th, 2010 and republished on June 18th

 

Napolitano: Internet Monitoring Needed to Fight Homegrown Terrorism

foxnews.com / Published June 18, 2010 | Associated Press

 

WASHINGTON -- Fighting homegrown terrorism by monitoring Internet communications is a civil liberties trade-off the U.S. government must make to beef up national security, the nation's homeland security chief said Friday.  (A:  So in other words, you see, you canít be safe and free at the same time so youíve got to lose your freedom to be safe.  Thatís what she is saying; itís a trade-off, civil liberties Ė thatís your freedoms folks Ė trade-off, so that national security can go ahead and make you safe.)

 

As terrorists increasingly recruit U.S. citizens, the government needs to constantly balance Americans' civil rights and privacy with the need to keep people safe, said Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

 

But finding that balance has become more complex as homegrown terrorists have used the Internet to reach out to extremists abroad for inspiration and training. Those contacts have spurred a recent rash of U.S.-based terror plots and incidents.  (A:  Etc, etc.  That also came under, remember, the law that Obama put through to stop home grown extremism and terrorism.  It also meant of course, anyone TALKING about any alternative version of what was happening than the governments would also be put down as terrorists.  That included folk on the internet or talk shows, obviously.)

 

"The First Amendment protects radical opinions, but we need the legal tools to do things like monitor the recruitment of terrorists via the Internet," Napolitano told a gathering of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy.  (A:  Now, does that mean anyone talking out and saying the government is full of BS Ė bothersome stuff Ė with its views and opinions on things?  Anyone speaking against that is actually a terrorist?  Is that what that means?  Of course it can be meant to mean that.  Is so broad it can be meant to mean anything you want it to mean, at the top.)

 

Napolitano's comments suggest an effort by the Obama administration to reach out to its more liberal, Democratic constituencies to assuage fears that terrorist worries will lead to the erosion of civil rights.

 

The administration has faced a number of civil liberties and privacy challenges in recent months as it has tried to increase airport security by adding full-body scanners, or track suspected terrorists traveling into the United States from other countries.

 

"Her speech is sign of the maturing of the administration on this issue," (A:  They are maturing, thatís what it is.) said Stewart Baker, former undersecretary for policy with the Department of Homeland Security. "They now appreciate the risks and the trade-offs much more clearly than when they first arrived, and to their credit, they've adjusted their preconceptions."  

 

So, this will be expanded and expanded all through the internet, as we well know.  Theyíve already put laws through on the internet to do with copyrights, etc.  Actually, when you read it, itís a lot more than just copyrights.  Itís also to include this kind of stuff here, about content, WHAT you are saying, what you are passing on to other people... content.

 

Most things are happening through Executive Orders basically.  There is one that came out from the White House, an Executive Order.

 

The White House - Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release June 10, 2010 / whitehouse.gov

 

Executive Order-- Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council

(A:  Thatís National Health Service, for folk who donít understand it.)

 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 4001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), it is hereby ordered as follows:

 

Section 1. Establishment.

There is established within the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (Council).

 

Sec. 2. Membership.

(a) The Surgeon General shall serve as the Chair of the Council, which shall be composed of:

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture;  (A:  This is for your health care, folks.  It brings in food and everything, farming, everything.)

(2) the Secretary of Labor;

(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services;

(4) the Secretary of Transportation;

(5) the Secretary of Education;

(6) the Secretary of Homeland Security;

(7) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;

(8) the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission;

(9) the Director of National Drug Control Policy;

(10) the Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council;

(11) the Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs;

(12) the Chairman of the Corporation for National and Community Service; and

(13) the head of any other executive department or agency that the Chair may, from time to time, determine is appropriate.  (A:  This is your National Health Service thingÖ covering everything.  Iíll put this up on my site too at the end of the night for you to peruse.)

 

Meanwhile, we slangÖ we slang the leaders, the ones that are the front men.  Iíve always said that Presidents and Prime Ministers, apart from being little psychopathic actors, really are not that important.  Itís only important we believe they are really the bosses.  Their job is to take the tomatoes Ė we throw tomatoes, mental ones, allegorical tomatoes at them when weíre unhappy.  We throw laurel leaves at them and petal of roses when weíre astonished at their generosity, which doesnít happen very often.  But the guys behind them know what they are up to, what their job is.  And the guys who are APPOINTED, there are more people who have been appointed to Obamaís administration than any previous administration.  Youíve all those greenies, all the ex-communists up there, the ones who are eugenicists who want the world run on a scientific basis, on boardÖ with the John Holdrenís and all these characters.  Whatís democratic about that?  Everything has been changed without folk even accepting the fact that everything has been changed.  Your whole system of government HAS been changedÖ and they donít know it. 

 

Obama, being a good little psychopath, like every other front man, is having a good time to himself.  And why not?  While you are king of the hill for a little while, king for a day as they used to say. 

 

President and First Lady are partying like rock royalty

Obama Wastes Millions of Taxpayer Dollars on Personal Entertainment

By Fred Dardick  Monday, June 7, 2010 / canadafreepress.com

 

The same hypocrite who says our energy costs must ďnecessarily skyrocketĒ to fund his political ambition, is giving Marie Antoinette a run for her money when it comes to spending national treasure on personal luxuries.

 

While much of the country is struggling to pay their bills, the President and First Lady are partying like rock royalty. The collection of talent that has made the pilgrimage to the White House to entertain Obama and friends is nothing less than amazing: Bob Dylan, Stevie Wonder, Tony Bennet, Paul Simon, Marc Anthony, Herbie Hancock, Martina McBride, Queen Latifah, The Foo Fighters, Faith Hill, and recently foot-in-mouth Paul McCartney to name a few.  (A:  Who actually is SIR Paul McCartney, by the way, which he likes to be called apparently.)

 

This has the makings to be the greatest ongoing concert series ever to be seen on this Earth just to entertain one man Ö all paid for by the American taxpayer.

 

Let Them Eat Cake

How much does this world-class entertainment cost? Assuming the artists themselves forgo appearance fees, I highly doubt Paul Simon would perform with just a karaoke machine as backup.

 

Professional equipment needs to be brought in - sound engineers, stages, lights, etcÖ Even small scale performances by these artists can be very expensive.

 

Add booze, food, security, invitations, social secretaries, wait staff, and hangers on to the tab and the price for one of these events could easily top $75K. (A:  It will be a lot more than that; thatís cheap.)  With over 27 concerts hosted thus far, the total cost to taxpayers is in the millions of dollars.  (A:  Thatís more like it.)

 

The executive branch does not provide detailed information regarding entertainment expenses, however, it has been estimated the Obamas spent at least $10 million on ďdrunken White House partiesĒ in 2009 alone.  (A:  So thatís not bad when there are more folk going on food stamps than ever before, as they bring the economy down and celebrate at the top that they are being successful because they are all part of bringing the economy down for the New World Order, you see.  Thatís the real world isnít it?)

 

James Lovelock youíve all heard of Iím sure, the nutcase who goes around, his whole life, parroting the Gaia concept.  Here is the guy who came up with the Gaia, the world really is one big goddess of interacting forces all interconnected and man is a scourge on the planet.  I'll be back with more on his sayings after this break.

 

Hi folks.  Iím Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about James Lovelock who made his name about the Gaia Theory and how everything is interconnected, the old Gnostic principle and that humans are destroying the planet and we are going through a cycle now, change. 

 

He was all into the cooling; now the warming scenarios started so itís all warming.  Heís changed his tune on some things.  He believes that nuclear energy is a good alternative to really power densely populated places like Britain has become and other countries too.  At the same time he still believes that catastrophes will happen.  Some of these guys live on catastrophes that never happen; they are so disappointed and they become bitter as they become older too.  But it doesnít stop them spouting on like a Jeremiah, that coming calamities have got to come.  The sea levels havenít risen at all you see, and stuff like that, and they are disappointed.  So now itís too many people and global warming.  But he does give you little clues.  He does say, heís always talked about the adaptive theory where the elite should always - you know, those who are well suited to survive just like the disaster movies they churn out now - should save themselves and prepare by building a place up near the North Pole which will be more habitable, really, for a long period to come, stuff like that. 

 

Heís also said this Ė because he mixes with all the elite, the big wigs, who use him very, very well, as a front man for their agendas.  He saysÖ

 

James Lovelock on the value of sceptics

and why Copenhagen was doomed

Posted by  Leo Hickman Monday 29 March 2010† / guardian.co.uk

 

On how humans will ever manage to tackle climate change:

 

We need a more authoritative world. We've become a sort of cheeky, egalitarian world where everyone can have their say. (A:  He doesnít really like that, us being cheeky, you see.)  It's all very well, but there are certain circumstances Ė a war is a typical example Ė where you can't do that. You've got to have a few people with authority who you trust who are running it. And they should be very accountable too, of course.  (A:  But he bewails, that you canít have this kind of dictatorial society.  He saysÖ)

 

But it can't happen in a modern democracy. This is one of the problems. What's the alternative to democracy? There isn't one. But even the best democracies agree that when a major war approaches, democracy must be put on hold for the time being. I have a feeling that climate change may be an issue as severe as a war. It may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while.

 

In other words, our bettersÖ our betters should just simply rule us like masters and slaves and get their agenda through, you see.  But, the elite have always prepared for EVERY possible disaster to make sure that they themselves and the lists that they have of the better people with the right stuff will survive. They already have their underground systems, protected against earthquakes, completely water proof, and everything else, stacked to the gills to last them a thousand years if need beÖ all over the place.  But I wonder if old Lovelockís been invited into one of them or not, or is even he not high enough for that?  Heís old stock.  Heís rather old stock you see, and they do want ones who will breed new little aristocracies. 

 

There you go.  Yeah, democracy should be put on hold.  Thatís been rampaged across all the world right now, through all the NGOs.  Weíve already got it with the farce of the terror, the war on terror which is a war OF terror.  They use this to get everything through including the environmental issues and take all your rights away from you.  There is so much I could go on about but there is no time; this hour rushes in.

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Non Governmental Organizations--How They Work to Order Our Lives

How NGOs Are Funded By Big Foundations

Civil Liberties traded Off for "Security"--Napolitano

Executive Order-- Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council

Cost of Entertaining Obama

Lovelock-It May be Necessary to Put Democracy On Hold For a While

 

Transcribed by Diana

 


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

BOOKS

"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3

&

"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)

CDs

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)

&

Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)

DVDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"