May 4, 2010 (#569)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 4, 2010:
IMF, BIS, World Bank Controlling Technique:
Bankers Confuse by Creating Own Diction,
If Money is Fiat, Then Debt is a Fiction:
"When Banks Plunder Nations - Reserves at Zero,
They Present Us with a Bigger Money Banks Hero,
He's Ruthless, He's Mean, Slash and Burn Tactic,
He's the IMF "Heavy", World Bankers' Fanatic,
Takes Over the Books, Takes Over the State,
Steals Pensions and Health Care, Leaving to Fate
Those at the Bottom, the Sick, the Needy,
Serving His BIS Masters, Podgy, Greedy,
Set Up Long Ago to Serve God of the Bankers,
Who Seeks World Dominion, Policed by His Gangsters,
While Others Sought Power by War, He thought, 'Funny,
The World Can be Conquered by Lending them Money,
Then by Controlling Exchange and International Trading,
They'll Gradually See Independence and Wealth a-Fading,
We'll Send in the Enforcer, the IMF Cop,
And Own the Whole Planet with World Bank on Top' "
© Alan Watt May 4, 2010
Poem & Dialogue
Copyrighted Alan Watt - May 4, 2010
(Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on 4th May, 2010.
Newcomers should look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and folk who listen regularly too and bookmark all the sites I have up there, the alternative sites. Sometimes the ‘com’ sites will let me down because too many folk go in at once or I simply can’t upload. I have trouble uploading sometimes to the ‘com’. They don’t always increase automatically your disc space although they’re supposed to.
So if you bookmark the other sites you can always get the latest audios for download; the latest shows. When you’re there too, look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. That’s one of the major sites in Europe. It has all the same audios for download and it has an awful lot of the transcripts of talks I’ve given over the years. You can choose from the various languages of Europe.
Now, all the other sites also have transcripts but in English only but the ‘sentinel’ site has a variety of languages from Europe to choose from.
Remember too that you are the audience that keeps me going. You can buy the books I have for sale, the CD’s, the DVD’s. I don’t ask for sponsors. I don’t ask for advertisers to back me up so I’m pretty well a loner out here. That way I’ve got a free hand to talk about certain things which they can’t really touch on or give honest opinions about certain things, without having to worry about a corporate sponsor by upsetting them. The ads you hear on this show are paid by advertisers directly to RBN for the airtime and for their staff and equipment and for the broadcast of the show and it helps pay their bills. But you have to help me pay mine and you can do so by buying all the things I have for sale.
Now remember from the US to Canada you can use personal cheque to Canada. You can also use an International Postal Money Order from your post office, Paypal to donate or to purchase. If you want to purchase, send a donation through Paypal and a separate email with your name, address and your order. You can also use Western Union, Moneygram or cash. Some folk just send cash.
For the rest of the world it’s the same thing. You can use Paypal for donations or for purchasing; Western Union, Moneygram or cash and that will get through. The post office isn’t that bad so far but they’re cutting back badly in the US I understand, closing alot of the post offices down.
For those who get the discs burned and passed to them who don’t use computers. They play them on a CD player. You can get in touch with me [listed above].
And that gets that out of the way because this show tends to be a little different at times.
I go into perception and reality. Most folk think they’re living in it simply because everyone else can agree with them on most topics. In fact you all talk about the same topics never realising that most of them are put out there for you to talk about. That’s a creation of a reality for the people. They create trends of topics and everything else and people ‘twitter’ and ‘tweet’ and ‘chat’ about them like little birdies. But they never realise that they’re being manipulated. Their minds are being manipulated and the time you could be spending finding out what’s really going on has gone to waste. You’re simply rehashing stuff that’s already hashed out for you to talk about and twitter about and tweet about and all of that kind of stuff.
Reality is vastly different. It’s been different for an awful long time. If you go back into the Middle Ages to get good writing on how millions of peasants were controlled by religion and how they used religion to give them the only reality they knew since they were utterly illiterate, at least most of them.
Back with more after these massages.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m talking about reality and perceptions and how even things we take for granted today. We take things for granted because everyone else is taking the same things for granted. That’s your ‘peer group’ you might say and of course we live in a new type of peer group making, where they give you total strangers and various people’s names across the world to ‘twitter’ with and ‘chat’ with and ‘tweet’ with and you all have pretty much the same opinions about the topics that are given out to you. Everyone’s heard about the same topics because the trends are created for everyone at the same time and that stops us really from thinking beyond the walls that have been created around us to get into the next room; the rooms where the guys that make all the trends that happen to link and communicate with eachother and decide on these trends that you’re all going to chat about, how you’re going to think about them, how you’re even going to feel about them.
They also keep the pulse on the people who are doing the ‘tweeting’ and the ‘chatting’ constantly; constantly. I’ve got so much data from the big players, IBM and all these guys, and how they’re projecting the whole future and basing their business plans on it. Actually, what they do is base their business plans at that level because it’s all part of the military world industrial complex and they create the future that you’re all going into. That’s why they gave you all of this technology, to monitor you and have a totally controlled, in what they call themselves, a completely interdependent world society.
Getting back to the Middle Ages though, if you were a peasant back then and you didn’t have television, you didn’t have radio, everything was word of mouth and you would know as much as the next peasant as you worked on the fields for the Lords.
You didn’t have to pay taxes in those days. They just took most of the stuff that you grew and left you with a little bit of ‘fodder’ for yourself if you were lucky. But things have improved now. They’ve got a better system. They call it ‘money’ and they take 60% of yours back in taxes. They used to leave the peasant 40% of his crops and so that hasn’t really changed that much when you think about it, but money’s more efficient and we now live in a monetary system.
The peasant really would talk to his wife in the evenings and all they would chat about was what’s happening on the farm; the different animals, maybe the children and what they’d heard at the church on Sunday and they’d chat and ask themselves what this particular sermon meant and all the rest of it. That was it. It was their entertainment and their intrigue as well at the same time and their mystery.
Of course, as time went on we had to get basic educations because all the peasants were moved off the land into the new cities; the slum cities; the ‘red brick’ cities as they were called, which were constructed for them to work in the factories for the big boys who ran the money systems. They’d kind taken over from the old feudal system.
We’ve really emerged out of that post-industrial and that industrial system has been moved to China for the meantime. We’re just a service economy now. However, we’re going through the biggest transformation since they moved the peasants into the cities in the industrial revolution, the biggest transformation now is into the global society but not any old global society. It’s a preordained, pre-planned society where every facet of it is worked out down to the minutest detail. Nothing is left to chance.
When you look through the big reports for the insiders for the big companies, like IBM, and as I say they’re definitely part of the big military-industrial complex, you see they even talk about themselves and how they can’t allow variables to creep into this system they’re building up and really working hard towards right now.
They talk about the intercommunication of all things in many different terms and phrases for the same thing.
We’ve heard about the world being covered with these ‘nano’ particles and so on all communicating. We’ve heard the World Wildlife Fund talking about them; the UN talking about it as well, where the whole planet will be one big vast kind of net if you like, where everything’s communicating data back in real time about every single thing. That includes you as well.
All your behaviour patterns, according to IBM, are already completely fixed and they understand you perfectly and can predict what you’re going to do outside some aberrant thing coming in, such as mental illness that would throw you off your usual pattern. Even then they’ll have projections, due to your family histories, if that’s even likely to happen; no kidding.
In other words, you think of totalitarianism as some small tiny little group somewhere trying to take over a world system. You don’t really get it. No, the world has been taken over a long time ago; a long time ago.
They set it up from the banking systems alone. They set up institutions. They set up their foundations to run and lobby governments and they can put their own people into governments.
This was verified by Carroll Quigley who said that every leader in the US for instance, every president, regardless of the party for 60 years, when he wrote his book ‘Tragedy & Hope’ in the 1960’s, he said had been a member of this organisation; this world organisation. They were comprised and set up by bankers. He went into the Council on Foreign Relations, how it ran the US. Its parent body in Britain was called The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
They also set up the banking system as we know it today with the World Bank and the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary Fund. They also ‘encouraged’ you might say, by every means possible, they’ve been doing the same thing with the Islamic countries right now to get central banks, because then they get the central banks to communicate directly with their ideas to the Bank for International Settlements, as they’ve been doing with all of us since the early 1900’s.
So one way or another you either join them or they bomb you out of existence. It’s hard to imagine that because it doesn’t appear in the papers, mainly because the owners of the newspapers are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and all the top journalists certainly are too. All of your presidents are and your prime ministers are as well. They have many branches, specialised little branches with little areas that deal with particular problems and as I say, you have to look at all the divisions of the banking system, the world banking system, and the history of it to understand how it all works together.
Now you know that the International Monetary Fund is like the ‘heavy’. They play the part of the collecting agency. They’re the ‘heavies’. That was also set up by the same group, The Royal Institute for International Affairs/CFR a long time ago. They actually set it up at the end of World War I, supposedly with the BIS, to make sure that the reparations, meaning the punishment money from Germany, would get paid forever to the rest of the participating opponents that they had called the allies in the West.
But it never stopped there. It started to dictate in peacetime too, to all the so-called peaceful countries, via the central banks. In other words, the central banks really had more of a communication and direct working relationship with the BIS and the IMF than even the president, some of the presidents and lesser presidents; the ones behind them on a lower level I should say.
Now, when the IMF goes in it takes over your whole economy to as they call it ‘balance the books’. It’s got an awful history, these heavies. It’s like everything else under the United Nations umbrella that was also set up; the UN was set up by the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They were the guys who backed it in fact and financed it into being. It was all their members that paid for their various buildings and so on, even the setting up of the UN building in New York by the Rockefellers.
As I say, the IMF comes in and they slash your pension funds that you’ve paid into. They’ll make people work longer after retirement too, until they drop, hoping that you’ll never claim any pension. That’s already being mandated in some countries right now because of the latest manufactured crash. Because they plunder the countries at least twice a century at minimum, that’s standard.
They also come in and open all your books and they start cutting back on your healthcare. They slash healthcare. They love national healthcare systems because it comes under government and they can do what they want with it. When it’s private they can’t really get their fingers in there you see, to slash healthcare. So they love governments to have a national healthcare system to get into and slash it big time, as they’re doing in Britain and elsewhere.
Well, Greece has been picked recently to be the poor man of Europe. They’ve chosen them to be the target and a lesson to the rest of them too, not to let this happen to you. It’s a kind of threat. They love using certain countries for teaching other countries to toe the line.
There’s an article for instance about the Greeks rioting right now. It says;
“Rioting Greeks throw petrol bombs (that’s gasoline bombs) at police” and that was from 1st May, 2010. It says;
“Greek protesters have clashed with riot police in Athens as anger about financial reform boils over.”
“Several hundred protesters waving red flags and wearing red bandannas confronted the police in the Greek capital on Saturday morning.
Two petrol bombs were hurled at the police lines, and armed police fired tear gas to dispel the crowd. Angry protesters set fire to rubbish cans (garbage bins) and two television broadcast vans.”
(Alan: So that’s what happens when chaos ensues because your money is suddenly worth nothing and in comes the IMF and they’re running the government. And what their slogans say are)
“"No to the IMF's junta!"...”
(A: That’s what they’re saying.)
“...protesters chanted, referring to the military dictatorship which ruled Greece from 1967 to 1974.”
(A: And that’s true. They put the IMF in then and put dictatorships in. It says)
“..."Hands off our rights! IMF and EU Commission out,..."”
(A: See the EU, they know this now. The EU is not some big wonderful thing that’s going to help you out and give you benefits. It’s really a gang that you’ve got to join or you don’t get business put your way. They can cut off business or bypass business around your country. Everything’s done, you see, in this real banking system, by pure blackmail and it’s called ‘free trade’ ‘if you join us’ and everything else that comes with it in the fine print at the bottom.)
Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m talking about the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund and all the other big consortiums that run the world’s financial system and how they go into countries like Greece and they teach them a lesson for the rest of the world to see and watch and learn from. In other words be very afraid. They ‘slash and burn’ as their tactics; ‘slash and burn’. A country never really recovers from their presence to be honest with you. It’s not meant to.
This article here is talking about how the police have been shooting at the people and have shot a boy already, probably more by now, and how the people are retaliating with gasoline bombs and so on. The signs are all about the getting out the IMF and the EU, that’s their parliament, their commission out. This European parliament, this incredibly big, remote parliament that’s the ‘super government’ over the whole of Europe, the new ‘Soviet Bloc’ you might say, on behalf of the bankers.
“Shops were closed, ships stayed docked and the streets of the capital were unusually empty except for protesters marching towards parliament, meters away from the Finance Ministry where EU and IMF officials have been meeting for days to agree a new set of austerity measures.
(A: Now, you better understand it. We’re hearing that word ‘austerity’ in all the countries now. This ties in with the plan as it is because the plan is that you’re post consumer. This is what they really mean. We heard all that before the crash came along. We’ve got to change our whole way of consumption and stop consuming so much while they’re going to make sure that you’re austere because now you’ll pay for everything.
The banks won’t suffer because you’ll be paying everything still through the banking system but it’ll be in the way of carbon taxes and multiple fees and so on to a thousand different government agencies, all to do with the environment, property and all that kind of stuff.
They’re simply transferring the idea and getting you to keep paying, keep paying but it won’t be for the right to buy things. It’ll be to pay for fees and the right to live and exist. It says)
“Union leaders are hopeful that the May Day protests will highlight Greek resistance to the wage cuts, tax rises and pension reductions expected to be implemented.
(A: And that’s what they always do; cut the wages, massive tax increases, pension reductions, lots of layoffs in the so-called public service industry; healthcare etc, and they’ve done this in other countries before. But they’re really going to town on Greece to make a real example to the rest; that you’re next if you don’t do it yourself in other words. That’s really what it’s about. There’re also alot of different groups in Greece. They definitely have communistic groups and anarchistic groups and so on, who are definitely going to it there, and it’s unfortunate at the same time.
But I understand everybody’s mindset at the moment because they’ve a better understanding of what’s really happening with the IMF and who they really, really are. It’s very important to know who they really are because we don’t live in a world of local bankers at the top. These aren’t local bankers. These are boys who are international money lenders who also set up the Milner group that became the Royal Institute for International Affairs/CFR.
They set up the UN. They set up the world to be run on a socialistic fashion for the people by themselves who are the obvious Fascists at the top.
Carroll Quigley was the official recognised historian for the Council on Foreign Relations who wrote the book about these bankers and the Council on Foreign Relations and how it was all set up by them to bring in a world global society, ruled by this banking elite. They believed that the banking elite were the only ones with a true understanding of history, the trends in history etc. because after all, they dealt with the fashion industry, the weapons industries; all the different loans.
They knew how loans were paid off, how they were defaulted on. They found ways to stop the defaults so that loans would still get paid off by the losers and that still goes on today; all to do with economics and keeping themselves in power.
They believe they’re the only ones, and they’re actually right. They’re the only ones keeping an alternative version of history as opposed to the other versions of history which was just about kings and queens and their conquests. They were keeping a version of history to do with commerce and trading across the world, a long, long, long history. It was already a science you might say.
They were the guys who were doing marketing before they called it marketing in universities. Carroll Quigley, who wrote the book ‘Tragedy & Hope’ and explained alot of this, and he wasn’t too popular amongst the CFR for doing so, he said this in it, in the book.
“The power of financial capitalism had a far reaching plan; nothing less than to create a world system of financial control, in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”
Now that’s quite ambitious isn’t it? He’s reading it form the official records of the Council on Foreign Relations, as the official historian, of the Council on foreign Relations. He says...
“This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.”
So they were the first to set up central banking systems. Remember they also funded communism too. Remember one of the planks of communism was centralisation of all government but they also meant the banks as well; a central bank for each country. It says...
“The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank, owned and controlled by the central banks which were themselves private corporations.”
Back with more on this after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m reading what Carroll Quigley said; a little bit in his book where he disclosed quite alot actually. He did say that there was a group running the world and had been doing it in secrecy for 60 years when he wrote his book in the 60’s. He also said they put every president of the US into power and every politician in the main Western countries as well into power. He goes on to talk about who set it up. He gives you the history of the Rhodes boys along with Rothschild who set up the Rhodes scholarships to train guys to become prime ministers and presidents and give them scholarships.
They didn’t limit it to the US or Britain, but the whole British Commonwealth countries and some other countries, even Germany they’d put their own boys in too. They put them all through the bureaucratic systems but they also put them into their central banking systems. He said here, again for the hard of thinking, and there are a lot of people who have hard of thinking problems I’ve noticed. It says here...
“The power of financial capitalism had a far reaching plan; nothing less than to create a world system of financial control...”
A world system; have you got that? It’s very important.
“...in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”
That’s exactly what they’re doing in Greece and some other countries right now and forcing the rest of the world into.
“This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world,...”
Meaning that they would not go through your congresses or your parliaments. It would never be mentioned. And it says...
“...by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.”
“The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank, owned and controlled by the central banks which were themselves private corporations.”
And still are.
“Each central bank sought to dominate its government.”
I’ll say that again for the hard of thinking.
“Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country and to influence cooperative politicians.”
Meaning, ‘cooperative politicians’ by subsequent rewards in the business world like Tony Blair for instance and many others.
You’ve got to read that book – ‘Tragedy & Hope’ and his other fantastic book where he explains even more in some detail and that’s – ‘The Anglo American Establishment’.
In ‘Washington’s Blog’, it’s quite a good blog this, there’s a bit of a history of it in here as well from April 26th 2010.
“When the International Monetary Fund or World Bank offer to lend money to a struggling third-world country (or "emerging market"), they demand "austerity measures".
As Wikipedia describes it:
In economics, austerity is when a national government reduces its spending in order to pay back creditors.”
(A: To these big private banks you see.)
Austerity is usually required when a government's fiscal deficit spending is felt to be unsustainable.
Development projects, welfare programs and other social spending are common areas of spending for cuts.
(A: That’s when they come in; the IMF. The IMF comes in and they cut it all.)
In many countries, austerity measures have been associated with short-term standard of living declines until economic conditions improved once fiscal balance was achieved (such as in the United Kingdom under Margaret Thatcher,...”
(A: Yep, they were in then.)
“...Canada under Jean Chrétien, and Spain under González).”
(A: They’ve been in all these countries.)
“Private banks or institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), may require that a country pursues an 'austerity policy' if it wants to re-finance loans that are about to come due. The government may be asked to stop issuing subsidies or to otherwise reduce public spending. When the IMF requires such a policy, the terms are known as 'IMF conditionalities'.
Wikipedia goes on to point out:
Austerity programs are frequently controversial, as they impact the poorest segments of the population and often lead to a wider separation between the rich and poor. In many situations, austerity programs are imposed on countries that were previously under dictatorial regimes, leading to criticism that populations are forced to repay the debts of their oppressors.
What Does This Have to Do With the First World?
Since the IMF and World Bank lend to third world countries, you may reasonably assume that this has nothing to do with "first world" countries like the US and UK.
But England's economy is in dire straights and rumours have abounded that the UK might have to rely on a loan from the IMF.
And as former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker said :
People seem to think the [American] government has money. The government doesn't have any money.
the IMF has already performed a complete audit of the whole US financial
system, something which they have only previously done to broke third world
Al Martin - former contributor to the Presidential Council of Economic Advisors and retired naval intelligence officer - observed in an April 2005 newsletter that the ratio of total U.S. debt to gross domestic product (GDP) rose from 78 percent in 2000 to 308 percent in April 2005. The International Monetary Fund considers a nation-state with a total debt-to-GDP ratio of 200 percent or more to be a "de-constructed Third World nation-state."
What "de-constructed" actually means is that a political regime in that country, or series of political regimes, have, through a long period of fraud, abuse, graft, corruption and mismanagement, effectively collapsed the economy of that country.
The IMF is - in fact - now saying that the U.S. must live more austerely.
As the Washington Post noted Saturday:
In the lingo of the International Monetary Fund, the future of the world hinges on "rebalancing and consolidation," antiseptic words that would not seem to raise a fuss.
But the translation is a bit ruder, something on the order of: "Suck it up. The party's over."
To keep the global economy on track, people in the United States and the rest of the developed world need to work longer before retiring,...”
(A: They hope you’ll die before you collect any money. They want your money off you but they don’t want you to claim it back in pension funds.)
“They want you to pay higher taxes,...”
(A: Very much higher taxes.)
“... and expect less from government. And the cheap imports lining the shelves of mega-chains such as Wal-Mart and Target? They need to be more expensive. “
(A: That’s exactly what they’re doing as they inflate, basically, the cash.)
“That's the practical meaning of a series of policy papers and statements issued in recent days by IMF officials, who have a long history of stabilizing economies...”
(A: And that’s a lie too. They don’t stabilise them. They plunder them. They technically own them for ever after. That’s really the plan anyway, isn’t it?)
“...and solving global financial problems, as they plot a course to keep the world economy growing and reduce the risk of another "great recession."
(A: No, you see, we’re supposed to go into a great recession to bring out the new type of system of austerity; permanent austerity. That’s what it’s really all about. But you’ll find too that the IMF’s been criticised heavily in the past. They’ve supported about 50 or 60 dictators. In fact they’ve even brought the dictators in. There’s a whole list of them here as well. The thing is too that most of these countries had very little debt when they brought the dictators in and they had a massive debt by the time the dictators left; all backed by the IMF.
Remember too what Carroll Quigley said, what he said about the Council on Foreign Relations. He said, ‘We don’t care if we deal with communist and bring communists in or dictators or whoever they are as long they’re all on board with our policies, we’ll bring them in’ and the IMF is just one branch of this whole big conglomerate. It’s quite fantastic.
If we go into all the different stuff they’re into it’s amazing.)
The Guardian really is one of the so-called world ‘lefties’ which really works for the conglomerates. They want to have the austere society. They want the greening projects because the bankers want the greening projects and the carbon taxes that are coming out of it; a massive new economy in carbon trading.
They actually put out a fantastic write up on it and they say that the IMF proposals get the big picture right. They’re all for it. They’re all for the whole greening agenda. They’re all for the carbon taxes, the greening and bring it back to nature and so on; too many humans and ya de ya de ya. They’re really a mouthpiece for them; a mouthpiece.
I’ll put some of these links up on my site www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show about the BIS too, the Bank for International Settlements because there’s a fantastic site here too that’s put alot of the history of the Council on Foreign Relations up, the central banks all working together with this BIS, the Bank for International Settlements, how they really do control the economies of all the world and all their trading and spending power and they already have been doing this since World War I. That other site goes through the Bilderberger group too and how they’re all part of the same particular conglomerate, the Trilateral Commission of course and how they’re also working in their specialised area to bring in the Trilateral Agreement, including the NAFTA agreement, completely binding the system of a united Americas that’s supposed to happen now in fact. This year will be the last year when they sign the last part of it supposedly and then we’re totally integrated. We’ll see how that works out.
They also go into the BIS.
“ The BIS is the world’s oldest international financial institution set up in 1930...”
(A: It says here but it was actually before that.)
“...with the twin aim of coping with reparations and loans from and to a very unstable post World War I Germany and, more importantly, to act as a forum for central bankers in the future. As such it was the epitome of supranationality, able to circumvent all those orthodox ideals that had over the years, become synonymous with the concept of the nation-state, such as ‘love of country’...”
(A: So it was supranational. It was post nations. It was global. And it says of course...)
“…such circumvention of patriotism by any of its board members could lead them to be accused of treasonable offences.”
(A: So they still played the game. It wasn’t quite right to go global totally then to the public.)
“In order to appreciate what follows it is essential to offer a brief resumé of the political economy at the turn of the century, the 20th century.
The Industrial Revolution having fostered the rapid growth of a capitalist economy, inevitably gave birth to an ideal dogma exposing the social and political discord inherent within that same system, which was based on the concept of one comparatively small group of people garnering profit from the wealth created by the labour of a much larger group. Thus was Marxism born - leading to the Bolshevik revolution in 1917.”
(A: That’s really what brought in the Bolsheviks, and by the way, the same boys at the Royal Institute of International Affairs helped fund that Bolshevik Revolution. The bankers funded it into existence to play the dialectic for a long time and standardise a big chunk of Europe under one system and it’s really the same system today; same schooling system, same bureaucratic system, governmental system. That’s what they’ve left behind them. It’s the fastest way to do it.)
“The USSR, now perceived by the industrial nations as representing the antithesis of capitalism was henceforth the enemy. The Cold War had begun and its most blatant expression was the birth of Fascism in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution.”
(A: So they created a dialectic you see, and the bankers lent to all sides. The intent was also through a World War II to bring in this new globalised system. They tried to get it under the United Nations right after World War II. They were confident that the public were ready to accept a world government but it wasn’t to be because they had alot of opposition, mainly from Britain and some parts of Europe, like France and so on. They didn’t want world government just then.
So they circumvented all that by making up, by creating all these banking systems that would force the world into their banking world system; the fastest way to get it through. But it says...)
“By the late 1930’s the Bank for International Settlements had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias, much of it disclosed by Charles Higham in his book, ‘Trading with the Enemy’.”
(A: And of course, even the Bush’s predecessors, the family were part of that. They were actually charged with trading with the enemy; the Walker side of the family.)
“Higham years later collaborated with a BBC Timewatch film ‘Banking with Hitler’ broadcast in late ’98.
Two examples of such bias, there were many more, were the Bank for International Settlements...”
(A: These are the guys who work with the IMF folks.)
“...had arranged transfers into the accounts of the German Reichbank of $378 million dollars of what was in effect gold looted from the coffers of the invaded countries of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Holland and Belgium; and, in the summer of 1942, plans for the American invasion of Algeria were leaked to the governor of the French National Bank who immediately contacted his German colleagues in the Bank for International Settlements, SS Gruppenfuehrer Baron Kurt von Shroder, of the Steinbank of Cologne, and transferring 9 billion gold francs to Algiers via the BIS.”
(A: This is your UN banking system folks.)
“The Germans and their French Subsidiaries made a killing of $175 million dollars in this dollar exchange scam.”
They was scamming all through World War II, these same these same banks that are now in there, in Greece today and in other countries with another branch of them, the International Monetary Fund. There’s a long history to all this. Most folk will never read the history therefore they’ll never really understand it and they’re quite content just going ‘ah! Oh!’ and ‘what’s happening with the world today?’ and twittering to eachother.
I’ll this link up there as well. It gives a quite good history; quite a long history in fact, of the workings of the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund and the central banks of the countries, all working in unison, from World War I, right through World War II, post World War II to the present time and they’re the ones who are pushing for the new post-consumerist society, a world controlled by bankers remember. That’s what Carroll Quigley said and it’s also what Mr. Rockefeller said in one of his major speeches.
They mean what they say. Why not when you’ve got all the money in the world? You just make it out of thin air and you lend it to other countries. Every nation...see they love governments because every nation has you down as a citizen which means that you’re now the guarantor of every loan; you, every one of you and your children’s children.
The banking system is ancient. When you owe money, you’re a slave and your children will be slaves too, until that’s paid off. That’s ancient. It’s in the Old Testament, all that stuff. It’ll never change. Nothing changes, nothing changes. That’s the real world folks. I’ll put this link in as well and let you read through it for those that have patience and the ability to concentrate for more than 15 seconds. The rest of you can go and ‘tweet’.
Anyway, we also see another side of this too and that of course is eugenics. That’s all part of that. You look at the families of bankers. Bankers looked a long, long time ago, in ancient times, at royal families and it’s well known in royal families that often they’d marry their sisters even to keep the power, the blue blood as they say; the royal blood in the same family. Some of the pharaohs did the same thing. Not only that, some of the big boys in Britain were doing it too, such as Charles Darwin and I’ll read this article about his family lineage when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting through the Matrix.
Just before I touch on Darwin, I mentioned before in ancient times that pharaohs and so on used to marry their sisters but the ancient bankers saw this system and thought ‘well, these guys are all dependent on us’ and they owned the traders and the trading groups, they owned commerce and they thought ‘well, we’ll do the same thing.’ They were very wealthy and they started marrying eachother; intermarriage with the bankers. That’s what the Rothschilds were all about too and many more too from the same commercial classes. Not only them, alot of them in the scientific classes also had little agendas. Those like Charles Darwin’s father for instance also wrote a book about basically evolution. You can actually still get a hold of it yet; and Charles was obviously trained to push it even further through The Royal Society. They were the ones who really pushed him. He was a nobody one day and the next day he was a star. You can make anybody a star. It was the same in those days too. You just kept saying a genius was going to expose something wonderful to the world, build it up for a few weeks and then bring forth the name Charles Darwin and he’s guaranteed success. It’s much the same today in fact.
Anyway, this article’s from The Sunday Times, May 2nd 2010, and it reiterates some of the stuff I’ve talked about Charles Darwin before from Ian Taylor’s book ‘Darwin and the New World Order; a very good book. Ian Taylor is a scientist by the way, a very good scientist who first enlightened me about this and the inbreeding that the special families were doing in Britain and in America and elsewhere. And it says here...
“THE children of Charles Darwin, whose theories on evolution revolutionised science, may have been genetically blighted themselves — because of generations of inbreeding in his own family.
Researchers have linked a series of marriages between cousins from Darwin's family, and that of Emma Wedgwood,...”
(A: The Wedgwood family of potters.)
“... who became his wife, to the high levels of infertility and premature death that beset both their wider families as well as their children.
Charles and Emma, who were also first cousins, had 10 children, of whom three died early while three were infertile.
Studies of Darwin's ancestors show a history of intermarriage between the Darwins and Wedgwoods that could have produced multiple genetic defects.
Such marriages were so common in Darwin's family, according to research from James Moore, professor of science history at the Open University, that both of his maternal grandparents and his mother were Wedgwoods.”
(A: Actually when Charles’ wife died, who was a Darwin, he married his wife’s sister. Yeah, no kidding.)
“He said: "In Victorian times it was quite common for cousins...”
(A: Well it wasn’t really. It was only in a certain small class.)
“...to marry but the level of intermarriage in these families was unusual even then." Moore found that:
- Darwin's maternal grandfather, Josiah Wedgwood, the founder of the pottery dynasty, had married his own third cousin, Sarah, and had eight children.
- The couple's eldest daughter, Susannah Wedgwood, married Robert Darwin, her cousin. Charles was their child.
- Meanwhile, Josiah and Sarah's second eldest son, also Josiah, had nine children, of whom four, including Emma, married first cousins.
(A: They all married the same families.)
“Moore, who is about to publish a research paper on Darwin, said: "The results of this unintended experiment...”
(A: I wouldn’t say it was unintended at all. It was definitely deliberate.)
“...in close-cousin breeding are striking — 26 children were born from these first-cousin marriages, yet 19 of the offspring did not reproduce. Five died prematurely, five were unmarried and considered deficient, and nine married without issue.”
(A: Meaning that they were infertile.)
So they were already doing Plato’s guardian class stuff back in Darwin’s day. They probably had done a long, long time before that too. Lots of these families did. And I’m sure they were all rectified with their genetic manipulations today with science.
From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Topics of show covered
in following links:
Rioters in Greece want IMF Out and Greece out of European Union
IMF the US and Austerity Plans
International Monetary Fund - Wikipedia
Bank for International Settlements
Darwin's Selection is Nature's Rejection