April 19, 2010 (#558)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt April 19, 2010:
Totalitarian Tyrants, Paranoid, Show Might,
Further Conditioning, Obeisance Through Fright:
"Welcome London Olympics 2012,
Into War OF Terror, Further We Delve,
Armies of Armoured, Big-Gun-Toting Scaries,
Protecting the People from Extremists and Crazies,
Air Battleships with Missiles and Drones Overhead,
The Sci-Fi is Here, Meant to Condition with Dread,
New Integrated System for Camera Tracking,
Although Bankrupt and Broke, Finances Not Lacking,
Cameras All Polished, Efficient and Pretty,
Will Track Any Individual Throughout the City,
New Fence in Defence, 5000 volts, Revolting,
They'll Laugh if You Touch It, Body Sparking and Jolting,
Land of Hope and Glory, Land of the Free?
Rising Brute Force and Terror, For All to See"
© Alan Watt April 19, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - April 19, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April 19, 2010. Newcomers, as always, I suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, bookmark all the other sites I have up there for future use in case there are problems with the .com site. You’ll find there hundreds of talks I’ve given over the years where I try to fill in the big picture for those who are really interested to know what’s going on in the world, what’s really going on in the world, and I try to give you the stepping stones to put it together to realize that you are really in a controlled society that’s outside of the fallacy of democracy or the government as it’s presented to you. You are living a script. So go into the site, have a good peruse of the different shows, try to listen to them IN ORDER if you can because you will learn an awful lot. There are not lizard people in here, no aliens; it’s just the facts… from the big boys themselves, from their own publications; the stuff the media knows is out there but they don’t tell you. Their job, in the media, is to keep you looking at the EFFECTS of plans, the EFFECTS of things, the oh dears and oh my, what are they doing now; look at this; outrage over blah, blah, blah. That’s what they give to you, however they know darn well what’s going on but their job is not to inform you. We have to do it here on shows like this.
Remember too that you are the audience that brings me to you. I don’t get paid by advertisers like most hosts do. I could certainly do it and bring lots of guests on that would really be paid ads and I would be rolling in the old cash… but that kind of compromises you as to what you can say and where you can go with certain topics as well. So this way it gives me a free hand. The ads you hear on this show are paid by the advertisers directly to RBN to produce this show, to put it out there, to get it out to YOU. It pays for the staff, their time, the board operators and their bills and updates of their equipment which everyone has to go through all the time especially when you are broadcasting on the waves. So you have to support me and you can do so by going into my web site and see what I have for sale. There are good books there that I’ve written, NONLINEAR thinking books to show you how the mind control works and to get you into thinking in a NONLINEAR way, like the ones who rule the world, the ones who know how to go around all these different courses and stuff, with the simplest problem and then come up with the ways of scamming you. That’s how they do it. I show you how they do it in the books. I'll be back with more after this break.
I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I’ve spent years showing you how the cons work and showing you how government uses many, many techniques and specialists of course, to get all the cons pulled over on us until we believe that it’s all quite normal and natural and things are just developing, and different agencies pop up and get power, and we simply adapt and obey. Adaptation is very, very important when you want to bring in this new… this DREAM, a very old dream actually, but this new system for us which is really BASED on totalitarian dictatorship type systems.
You’ve got to remember too that the Royal family of Britain and other countries were very impressed with the Nazi regime and even the Soviet regime. They were incredibly interested in the progress of these great experiments, as they like to call them. What was so important to them was the Soviet system which was technically called SOCIALIST. It’s a good con that the people ran the country themselves, one of the biggest deceptions ever created. But it was to get the people to work IDEALISTICALLY… idealistically towards something. They write in their writings they are always looking for men with VISION and along comes a man with vision. What they mean by that is directing another century or so of the world’s direction. Vision is very important to them. Therefore, the communist vision, with its idealistic promise of this wonderful utopia where everyone would be well behaved, they’d all believe in the system, and they were working TOWARDS a goal collectively, and sacrificing on the way. It was very, very important as an experiment.
Remember too, the British banks and a lot of these people had financed the setting up of the Bolsheviks and their continuation down through the Soviet era. It’s the same thing with Adolf Hitler. Professor Anthony Sutton wrote books on them, who financed Hitler and the rise and fall of, I think it was, the Soviet Union. He shows you who bankrolled them all, the same banks and the same big people with their cash in those banks from the West, from London and New York primarily. And the big corporations too that were ALL behind it, the SAME ones – the IBMs, the Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller Foundations, with their businesses as well, with Standard Oil and all those guys. They set up Nazi Germany as well. They were both socialist based with this totalitarian system; we are all working together, we are ALL in it together working and sacrificing towards a glorious future, this wonderful utopia… VERY important to Fabianists, to all the people who were behind it. They had to see how it worked and they learned by their mistakes.
We forget that Hitler and Stalin had a pact in the beginning because they were both socialists. They had meetings where Hitler and Stalin agreed that there was very little difference between them. In some of the early posters for Adolf Hitler, they actually had the picture of Lenin next to him. Hitler was actually appraised to be another Lenin. This is also called POSITIVE FREEDOM in psychological terms by those who plan the futures for whole societies, like Isaiah Berlin for instance. He taught at Oxford University. He was a mentor to people who were in the Fabian Society and he taught Tony Blair. Tony Blair was still writing to him right up until the end of his Prime Ministership asking if it was possible to put a blend of NEGATIVE freedoms and POSITIVE freedoms together.
Negative freedom was to find a society of people who are kept kind of happy, kind of fairly happy. You leave them enough money to play and you give them enough booze to play with and parties and stuff like that. Negative, but you keep them ignorant as to what’s REALLY going on. Positive freedom is where you create emergency situations, like war scenarios or anti-terror scenarios and you get the whole country, just like World War II, all working together, sacrificing, rationing, to achieve a common goal with a VAGUE ending of a sunset or something, a new sunrise. That’s the idea of positive freedom.
Tony Blair, knowing that Britain had been under a type of negative freedom – keep them ignorant and stupid but fairly happy, just enough money to tick by and party – and could he blend that with positive freedom?… because he wanted to bring in the next step for a united Europe. That was his goal because he was a Fabian. That was their goal, to create the completely integrated united Europe. Along comes the anti-terror stuff and BINGO, oh, war, here we go. We have to go into positive freedom. We all work together. We all sacrifice. We all have to put up with unhappy things like body searches and seizures. We got to get the Military-Industrial Complex in, now that the Cold War is over too, and they’ve all been going into cameras and security devises to monitor BILLIONS of people across the world. So that’s what we’re in now. It’s now called positive freedom.
On the United States side, with their side of it too, when Bush was in - Bush with his handlers behind him, the whole staff behind him, the Cheney’s, Wolfowitz’s and all the rest of them - had it planned to go into what they called REVOLUTIONARY DEMOCRACY. What it meant was FORCING their system across the world; doing it by FORCE. No time to bicker, no time to persuade, no time to put missionaries in there to spread the idea, it was time to just simply go in there and FORCE them into it through war scenarios and standardize the world. So you have positive freedom where we all sacrifice, globally now, towards a common goal, some vague utopia of peace and happiness in some vague future. In the meantime, we’ve got to be thumb printed, iris scanned, bent over, all kinds of things poked into us, and x-rayed, and we have no privacy whatsoever because WE’RE ALL IN IT TOGETHER. The greatest slogan every war has ever had… and banners and propaganda pictures… WE’RE ALL IN IT TOGETHER, we have to sacrifice and we all have to do it together.
When you do that you are training the public that when someone complains and says, I don’t want to do that, I don’t want to get poked and prodded, the public themselves are conditioned to TURN ON YOU... Oh, we all do it. We all have to do it, you know. We’re all in it together. It’s for the common good. Quite something. It’s quite something.
When you go into the science fiction movies that have been put out for the last 30 years, with the big G-men, the black outfits, dressed in body armor, faceless characters with machine guns, and always fighting terror, terror, terror. That was to get you used to what’s coming. They always have these scenarios where it’s a bleak future, with masses living in poverty, but there is still somehow terrorism out there and they have to keep on top of it for their bosses, those who run the whole system. You see. That was all preparation. It’s just like the Pentagon. You wouldn’t believe how many movies the Pentagon has directly funded… and they are all to do with anti-ARAB movies, and wars in the Middle East, starting from the 1970s onwards, getting everyone ready for this. You can’t trust the Arabs. The Arabs, they always show them in the desert. There is no such thing as a good, first class, modern world, Arab city anywhere; they are just these characters in the desert that you can’t trust and they are very excitable and very primitive and so on and so on. They’ve been doing this for 30-odd years, from Hollywood.
Hollywood was only too happy to portray the Arabs this way because they have an added interest, as we all know, in Israel. There is no doubt about that. There is no doubt about that whatsoever. Israel has to be saved by every and all means possible by America… tied at the hip. Completely tied at the hip and Prime Ministers of Israel have come out and said that openly. Some of them have actually said, don’t worry about the American opinion, we rule America. That’s been in major newspapers and I have the clips here. So you have the Pentagon working with Hollywood to lambast Arabs all in preparation for this big standardization process, as they flatten all resisters in the Middle East and bring them into the same system. Starting with the children who are already being brainwashed in Iraq by UNESCO so that a generation will have to pass and grow up in it and be the first administrators, like puppet administrators, for the new global system. It’s all quite understandable.
These movies are getting the public full of fear as well. You always create fear WAY in advance and we all pay for it through tax money via the Pentagon to Hollywood. Lots of movies; I have lists of them that were all funded completely by the Pentagon. This thing I’m going to read now is right out of a science fiction movie, for all of those who have watched all these disaster type scenarios and bleak futures. It’s from The Games Monitor.
London 2012: one big party or one big prison?
By Mike Wells / gamesmonotor.og.uk
(Alan: Listen to this. This is fact. This is actually fact… it’s right out of science fiction.)
Security precautions for London 2012 (A: That’s the Olympics.) include the construction of a 17.5 km, 5,000volt electric fence, topped with 900 daylight and night vision surveillance cameras spaced at 50 metre intervals. On first sight of the fence you could be forgiven for thinking you had slipped through a wormhole in the space-time continuum to find yourself on the perimeter of a Soviet era Gulag.
The Code of Practice for the operating CCTV at the London Olympics states that the threat of hostile individuals attempting to gain access through the perimeter is believed to justify the use of CCTV.
As part of the Command Perimeter Security System, CCTV will be deployed.
Security Fence: The 17.5 km fence has 900 day and night vision cameras and is topped with many strands of 5,000 volt electrified wire. (A: 5,000 volt electrified wire… to protect their big party. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article that’s like something out of a sci-fi movie to do with electrified fences for the Olympic games and all these cameras all over the place. I’m sure they’ve got sound cameras there as well, night vision, all that kind of stuff. They admit to that. It’s on a 17.5 kilometer fence… 17.5 kilometers, with 5,000 volts going through it. It says here….
It gives the feeling of a prison rather than of a party venue.
The use of military terms like hostile individuals and Command Perimeter Security System highlight a contradiction between the Olympic promise and reality, between the a sporting party image and a security paranoia now made visible in the form of the Olympic perimeter fence. But there is a large and profitable industry supplying equipment (A: This is the important part too.) and research to feed the paranoia of a new security mindset identified by author Matt Carr who comments…
A new genre of military futurology has emerged which owes as much to apocalyptic Hollywood movies as it does to the cold war tradition of ‘scenario planning’. (A: That was the RAND Corporation scenario planning.) Often outlandish and bizarre in its prophecies, and always dystopian, this new military futurism sees threats to the western way of life emanating not only from rogue states, weapons of mass destruction and terrorism but also from resurgent nationalism, conflicts over dwindling resources, migration, disease, organised crime, abrupt climate change and the emergence of failed cities where social disorder is rife. (A: That all came out, remember, of the Department of Defence for Britain and NATO, from their think tank, and I’ve got the 90 pages of the report up on my archives section if you go into it. It’s fascinating. This is exactly true. All this stuff comes right out of all their scary predictions of all the possible ifs that could go wrong in the future. They literally use your tax money to throw billions at every possible if, believe you me.)
Joint Metropolitan Police and special forces anti-terror exercise: (A: They had that there too… in advance of it.) This exercise was so realistic that amputees were used as fake casualties, as can be seen from the bloodied leg. Loud explosions and gun fire was heard during this exercise. (A: This is the photographer.) I left the scene as soon as the commanding officer threatened to arrest me under the Official Secrets Act for taking photographs. (A: This is Britain… Joint Metropolitan Police and special forces anti-terror exercise… they had it there.)
Other security measures to be implemented for London 2012 will include facial and iris recognition, finger-print and hand recognition, guards with attack dogs and search dogs. New software is planned to integrate all of London's CCTV cameras, (A: That’s very interesting. New software, they are always upgrading everything because there are big bucks for the manufacturers who now have to change from missiles after the Cold War, into all this stuff. See, WE are the new enemy, you understand.) and will have the capability to follow you through the city. (A: Every individual can be followed through the city, automatically… just like Enemy of the State, the movie.) A scheme to search people and vehicles will include machines capable of looking through your clothing. (A: They have the PORTABLE x-ray scanners folks. I mentioned that months ago. They have the portable ones; the cops have them in their cars. So they can go and laugh, and tee-hee and titter, as they are looking at all the young females going by.) The Air Force will deploy its Reaper pilot-less drone aircraft, (A: Reaper, that’s the GRIM REAPER, you understand; they love this military terminology. YOU are the enemy, you are the scum. The REAPER.) which will carry laser-guided bombs and missiles including the Hellfire air-to-ground weapon. While on the Thames, the Royal Navy will deploy its new £1 billion Daring class Type 45 destroyer. These are also to be fitted with laser-guided missile systems able to shoot down a target the size of a cricket ball.
It is rumoured the London’s Met Police are planning to use remotely controlled mini aeroplanes with surveillance cameras (spy drones) at the Olympics. A company likely to supply the equipment is AirRobot UK Ltd. Air Robot UK’s website tells us that…
AirRobot UK was chosen as the UAV [unmanned aerial vehicle] system to cover aerial surveillance at the London Olympics 2012 Handover Ceremony during the late summer of 2008. The system was deployed at The Mall and Buckingham Palace to provide real time images to emergency services at the event.
The Home Office (A: That’s the British complete… they are in charge of all laws. It’s like the Homeland Security in other words, all laws throughout Britain.) website alleges that...
Ensuring the safety and security of the 2012 Games will be one of the largest, most complex security challenges the UK has ever faced.
The Home Office’s suggestion appears an overstatement. Securing Britain form Nazi Germany during the second world war, and preventing global nuclear destruction during the Cold War would fit the their description, but as Matt Carr comments… In recent years, the military establishments of the US and the UK have produced a series of reports that attempt to ‘think the unthinkable in imagining future threats to the security of the West.
The Olympic Act, which sets out various laws relating to the Olympics, gives the right of forced entry into private property to remove unauthorised advertising or protest banners. (A: This is freedom for you.) Even more worrying is that the right of forced entry is extended outside the police force to staff contracted to the ODA. (A: That’s the low level thugs. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just going through one article to do with the totalitarian societies and the training of the MOB, you know, the people who are now all the enemy. That’s really what the training is all about. We are all the enemy, apparently, in this brave new world and when we are completely united, and they admit we are united, we already are in fact, then they expect problems here and there and they are training us all to be obedient and afraid. They are actually using SOCIAL APPROVAL and SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL so that the masses, who are totally brainwashed, will turn on YOU if you complain about something. Well, it’s okay for us, we have to bend down and get searched, what’s wrong with you… and that’s what they use. They used these techniques already in other countries like China. It says here…
According to The Times security measures for the London Olympics will include the nationwide use of Section 44 of the Terrorism Act, allowing police stop and search without suspicion. The London Olympics and its security does not exist in isolation but in a continuum of increasing state surveillance and security hysteria. Any extra powers gained by the state over the citizenry should ring alarm bells because of the danger they will become accepted and permanent.
A subcategory of Military Futurism known as Red Teaming is a way of assessing your own security from the point of view of those who would attack you, as though you are your own enemy. It is promoted as a way of thinking without preconceptions or boundaries. Red Team journal comments that …
[S]ome events also are so unlikely that their very randomness lowers all obstacles to them occurring. […] This poses a particular problem for red teaming and threat analysis. How can we plan for every conceivable scenario? Or, to take a different tack, should we? Being strong everywhere means being weak everywhere. One can easily drain organizational resources planning for “movie-plot” WMD terrorism only to be surprised by a group of men with machine guns. But protecting the national interest is a [sic] task that must be accomplished regardless of human weakness. (A: In other words, all or nothing. They’ve got to cover every imaginatory possibility. They sit with think tanks and say, well, what could, someone might put on a false nail and it could be explosive. The sky is the limit with your imagination, isn’t it? Totally the limit and that’s what these guys get paid for. Then they put money at it and start checking your fingernails and stuff like that. I’m not kidding. This is how MAD all of this is. That’s a very SCARED people you know, at the same time, at the top. They want NOTHING to go wrong that could throw off their big Fabian world society; their controlled world society where you will gradually be taught to take credits from the government in lieu of money and you will SERVE, you will be PROUD to serve the world system. Huxley said it perfectly well, the people will be trained to LOVE their slavery. That’s what you are going into; make no bones about it.)
The idea that we should “protect the national interest regardless of human weakness” sounds more like a line from a Hollywood B movie than something that should be taken seriously by government agencies, and yet looking at the development of the London Olympic Security one can imagine this is a way of thinking that has taken root. (A: It goes on and on and on, quite a long article but that gives you the idea of this incredible sci-fi nonsense we are going through with 5,000 volt fences and the black clad, totally armored warriors standing there with the faceless helmets and these masks on and all the rest of it, just like ALL the movies have conditioned you for 25-30 years. Absolutely amazing, but here we are.)
It’s amazing too, they can do all this when we are supposedly utterly, UTTERLY, incredibly broke. Never been broker, they keep telling us but they get all this money to throw at the big security companies who lobby governments and they know all the politicians. You know for every government contract that goes out there, there is a kickback to the guy who awarded it to them. You all know that. I hope you really understand that. That’s how it all works… for the very, very naïve out there.
There is an article I’ve read already but it’s about the FBI chief talking about home grown terrorism – I’ll put this one up too – where they give out their latest spiel about Al-Qaeda, Al-Qaeda, this strange, you know, fictional Al-Qaeda.
Home-grown, solo terrorists as bad as Al-Qaeda: FBI chief
Apr 15 - breitbart.com
Al-Qaeda still aims to strike inside the United States but home-grown or unaffiliated extremists now "pose an equally serious threat," FBI chief Robert Mueller (A: The big Nazi.) warned US lawmakers Thursday. (A: And on and on it goes.)
It’s getting to the public trained that they are all out amongst you. Anybody that’s odd, you should report them. Anybody who comes out with a strange idea, like is there something going on and we are being taken over. I wonder. Any odd question that you have, just report them. Just report them right away. That’s what the training is all for. Again, they give you the movies to prepare your mind. That’s called PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING. What you see in a movie, because it’s fictional, your guard is not up, the Censor part of your brain is not up, you are enjoying the movie, they give you a human interest story, there are the bad guys, here are the good guys, the good guys are trying to capture the bad guys, here is the chase, they get the guy in the end… but along the way you are getting programmed with all the other ideas that they want to sink into you. The movie story line is just the CARRIER FOR THE MESSAGES. That’s all it is; it’s a carrier. It says here, from this article…
Crime Prediction Software Is Here and It's a Very Bad Idea
gizmodo.com / April 14, 2010
There are no naked pre-cogs inside glowing jacuzzis yet, but the Florida State Department of Juvenile Justice will use analysis software to predict crime by young delinquents, (A: Remember the movie Minority Report?) putting potential offenders under specific prevention and education programs. Goodbye, human rights!
They will use this software on juvenile delinquents, (A: It will start on them.) using a series of variables to determine the potential for these people to commit another crime. Depending on this probability, (A: Not possibility, but probability…) they will put them under specific re-education programs. (A: That’s STRAIGHT out of the Soviet Union. RE-EDUCATION programs. So now we have gulags with 5,000 volts going through them and RE-EDUCATION programs. They started off the re-education programs under the guise, and it was under the guise of ‘sensitivity training’. That’s how they started it. And they always knew where they were going with it.) Deepak Advani—vice president of predictive analytics at IBM (A: There’s IBM, the guys that brought out the Kardex system for us all to be chipped, of course. They worked with RAND Corporation. IBM, the beautiful IBM - or I BEAM as I like to call it, because that’s what it is - also came up with the way to number people in the concentration camps. The Jews and the Gypsies, there was a lot of Christians there too, Jehovah Witnesses and all the rest of it and lots of Slavs, got NUMBERED, tattooed, to keep the records tidy you understand. They’ve got have everybody numbered… and they are going to it electronically today and eventually when you are chipped, you’ve got your number boy. So depending on this probability, they put them into specific re-education programs.) Deepak Advani—vice president of predictive analytics at IBM—says the system gives "reliable projections" so governments can take "action in real time" (A: I love all the terminology, in REAL TIME, oh yeah…) to "prevent criminal activities?"
Really? "Reliable projections"? "Action in real time"? "Preventing criminal activities"? I don't know about how reliable your system is, IBM, but have you ever heard of the 5th, the 6th, and the 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution? What about article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? No? Let's make this easy then: Didn't you watch that scientology nutcase in Minority Report? (A: He’s talking about one of the actors who is in Scientology, that acted the part in Minority Report.)
Sure. Some will argue that these juvenile delinquents were already convicted for other crimes, so hey, there's no harm. (A: And that’s how the people think isn’t it?) This software will help prevent further crimes. It will make all of us safer? (A: Aaahhh, safe.) But would it? Where's the guarantee of that? Why does the state have to assume that criminal behavior is a given? And why should the government decide who goes to an specific prevention program or who doesn't based on what a computer says? The fact is that, even if the software was 99.99% accurate, there will be always an innocent person who will be ------. (A: And he uses an expletive, which is very common in Hollywood in the movies.) And that is exactly why we have something called due process and the presumption of innocence. That's why those things are not only in the United States Constitution, but in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights too.
So that’s to give you an idea. If you have one crime… remember, one strike and you’re out; that’s it for life folks. You have to go and get your MIND re-educated, just like Clockwork Orange. See the old movie Clockwork Orange. Satire in a strange, surrealistic way and a bit of comedy can really get through better often than just the bland spoken word of the bare facts alone. Quite something indeed.
We know that the climate deal is a done deal. It was done before the public ever heard about the climate change. They planned it back in the 70s and said THIS is going to be the mandate, a war that the world will face. It will have to be a war scenario so they PICKED climate change and global warming. Back in the 20s in the mainstream papers they had, first it was melting of the North Pole. In the late 1920s it was the freezing of the North Pole and my God, all the shipping routes were being frozen up so they thought that they would come up with the coming ICE AGE. Well, that didn’t pan out either so all the guys who worked at the United Nations, all the top Fabians and so on, and communists, had to change it. The same guys, and they started writing books about global warming thinking, okay, we’ll change the bet to global warming. And before that too, ACID RAIN was the big thing. Everybody has forgotten about acid rain. And the HOLE IN THE OZONE, that was going to kill us all off and that didn’t pan out either. So they came out with CLIMATE CHANGE, you know, changes in the weather. It rains one day, it’s sunny the next… that kind of idea. They’d get the whole world under control because they’d have to take over and give us a brand new system of governance… to bring this in and force it all down our throats. It’s really intended to bring in a brand new system of eugenics, killing off the weak, being austere… meaning no medicine for you sonny, you don’t really warrant it, you are not important enough on the social ladder for your community. That’s how they literally are working it out. There are hospitals even in Britain that literally classify you according to your social status in the community, are you necessary to the community. That depends on your treatment you are going to get IF ANY or even get resuscitated. I’m not joking about that. This is the big stick.
This here says…
COLLEGE GIVES FILES OF CLIMATE CHANGE SCEPTICS TO POLICE
The Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia
Friday April 16,2010 / scottishdailyexpress.co.uk / By Donna Bowater
(A: This is the college that’s really furious now because East Anglia was the center, with all of its emails plus all its phony content showing the dirty tricks they got up to, stopping people, real good scientists too, prominent scientists, with any alternate views, actually barring them from getting anything published in the papers. Utterly dirty Mafia tricks… and they are getting away with it. They won’t change this. Too much work went into this. How do we get them to a totalitarian system and a New World Order to come into view? You’ve got to use this system and that’s the only one they’ve picked. They can’t go back.)
THE university embroiled in the scandal over leaked climate change emails has sparked outrage by handing the personal details of climate change sceptics to police. (A: So anyone who asks for information from East Anglia University, you’ve got a special police squad investigating you.)
The University of East Anglia claimed it had been deluged with requests from sceptics (A: You are called a skeptic if you question anything; you’re like a heretic.) under the Freedom of Information Act shortly before hacked emails were published which appeared to show scientists manipulating climate change data. (A: And this is only ONE of ALL them across the world combined doing the same stuff. It came out in Australia and it came out in other countries.)
But the university has angered privacy campaigners after passing on the details of those asking for information to Norfolk Police, which is investigating the alleged email theft with the National Domestic Extremism Unit. (A: If you ask a question about it folks, you’re an EXTREMIST. Shortly they’ll be burning you at the stake. Oh, you’re a climate change DENIER, ah, burn ’em at the stake. You know. I’m not kidding. This is the same mentality at work here. You’d better get that through your heads. When your private data, from a simple request, is handed over to the National Domestic EXTREMISM Unit, you are in trouble.)
Detectives are interviewing all those who legally used the FOI Act to request information from the Climatic Research Unit, questioning them about their scientific and political beliefs. (A: Not what you KNOW, but what do you BELIEVE… burn ’em, burn ’em at the stake…)
One of those targeted said: “It’s alarming – I thought it was a bit heavy-handed. My understanding is everyone who put in an FOI request to the university has been contacted.
“The police were looking for a conspiracy. They felt there had been an organised group of people bombarding the university with questions. I would have appreciated more of a briefing before launching into questions about my political beliefs.”
Another, businessman Sebastian Nokes, said he had been called by a detective who “wanted to know what computer I used, my internet service provider, and also to which political parties I have belonged, (A: Do you understand the DANGERS of all this stuff? Do you really get what’s REALLY happening here?) what I feel about climate change and what my qualifications in climate science are. He questioned me at length.” (A: Once you are on these databases folks, you are never scrubbed off it.)
Mr Nokes’s FOI request had asked for details about the training given to scientists to disclose information and for copies of any emails suggesting they had withheld information. (A: That was a reasonable request since it was broken out in the newspapers.)
Dylan Sharpe, director of privacy campaigners Big Brother Watch, said: “It’s disgraceful that people are being targeted without evidence. Sending an FOI request should not be a police matter.
“It is not a crime to want to know how public money is spent, any more than it is to question the science of climate change.” (A: Well it IS now a crime folks to ask that. Where is the money spent? …and you are dragged in by the National Domestic EXTREMISM Unit, your specially black clad guys, special padding they get and special little badges. They love to be SPECIAL in these forces, you see.)
A Parliamentary Select Committee report found the university had a “reprehensible” culture of withholding information and called for greater transparency in climate research. The row broke out over emails that suggested scientists used “tricks” when dealing with raw data to prove global warming was man-made.
Detective Superintendent Julian Gregory, who is leading the investigation, said: “As with any investigation we will interview anyone who may have information which is of relevance.” (A: That’s all those who ask questions.)
Do you know that the government and different departments asked questions as well and they were told by the University of East Anglia, oh, we lost it all. They had actually hidden it all… but they lost it all. So they lied to them too. I wonder if they will investigate the government …and go through all their members and ask them and get the Domestic Extremism Unit onto them as well? They might find some extremism there too. They will certainly find a lot of paybacks and bank accounts offshore. The utter system is corrupt and the GANGSTERS are the ones they hire, in all ages, to bring in complete totalitarian systems, on behalf of their masters. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. There are callers on the line and I’ll take them now. There is Miguel from New York. Are you there Miguel?
Miguel: Hey, how are you doing Alan?
Alan: Not bad.
Miguel: Pleasure to speak to you. I’ve been a lifelong fan. I’ve been listening to your podcasts every day, consistently for about 3 years at least, so thank you for your time. Alan, talking about what you were talking about, Hollywood, it’s amazing how people never realize how much we’ve actually been programmed, with everything that’s happening. The first time we actually saw a black President was in the movie Deep Impact and it was popularized on the TV show 24, which is also a first. It is also the TV show that actually showed the government actually setting off its own nuclear bomb on its own state, which is what happened in one show. Now, with the rise of the nuclear stuff happening, and at the same time on Friday I was watching Bill Maher’s show and they had the director of An Inconvenient Truth. He made a new movie by who knows what chance? It’s a movie about terrorists getting nuclear weapons. What do you think about this incoming action happening at the same time? And as I like to say, there is no such thing as a coincidence in life.
Alan: Oh, there is no such thing, absolutely. We are prepared mentally and psychologically by guys like Sunstein that work with Obama, a big professor in psychology, mass psychology, behavior motivation, and behavior alteration on a mass scale. They work with Hollywood, absolutely. I could write out a whole book on the movies that Hollywood has been paid for directly by the Pentagon. I’ve actually got one here in fact. It’s fascinating to see how they’ve been demonizing Arabs, for instance, for 30 years. Demonizing them with movie after movie before anything was ever happening, in preparation for today. So you are quite right. They definitely put Obama in at the right time and he is following his master’s orders. He is exactly the same as Bush; he is doing what he’s told. He hasn’t changed anything. We still serve the banks. We must all go into poverty to save the banks once again. That tells you who his bosses are. And the guys behind him are the same bunch, really, that were behind the Bush’s. It’s a continuation of it. You know, the guy in front is never important. It’s the NUMBER 2 that’s important in their system, ALWAYS.
Miguel: Correct, because if you think back, nobody paid attention when Rahm Emmanuel, who to me personally, is one of the guys running the show behind the scenes. There was a time when it made everyone laugh, like when he was cracking his knuckles and Obama told him to stop. He crept over to Obama and he cracked his knuckles in his ear and everyone laughed like it was a joke but you know, if you think heavy about it, you don’t do that to your boss. That was a show of power, telling Obama, look, I run the show; know your place.
Alan: Yes. Absolutely. Also, you cannot have people advising, and giving a reality… remember that article I read where one of them, from their last Presidency, an advisor said to the reporter. He says, we GIVE you your reality and we change your reality and when we change it, you talk about that, you reporters talk about that, that becomes your reality and then we change it again and that becomes another reality and that’s just the way it is. I mean, that is a fact. But one thing is too, you cannot have people with DUAL citizenships running the United States of America. You cannot have dual citizenship, people who are compromised between two different nations. It’s impossible. And that’s what you have today as well. And they are both involved in the Middle East.
Miguel: You are right about that. Are you going to write a new book any time soon, Alan?
Alan: I hope so. I really hope so, if I can just get the time to really rush one through.
Miguel: Thank you for everything. You have a good day.
Alan: You too. Thanks for calling.
It’s true and this farce of the people vote in these people, it’s nothing more than a FARCE. Again, you’ve got to read Carroll Quigley’s books, The Anglo-American Establishment and Tragedy and Hope to get the idea of the big global plan starting with free trade, then blocs of nations which become provinces under the United Nations. That’s their utopia; depopulation, the whole thing and in the process they will cause as much strife as possible.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Transcribed by Diana