April 14, 2010 (#555)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt April 14, 2010:
If You 'Can See', You Might Break
Discard Media Voodoo, Become Own Guru:
"For Those Who Wish to Leave World of The
Result of Education, Ensuring Little to Go On,
You Must Have Craving to Understand
Higher Realities, Which are Hidden as Planned,
As Time Goes On, You'll Grow with Each Season,
And One Day Awake with Phenomenon of Reason,
Coupled with Intellect, You'll See the Light,
In This World So Dumbed Down, It's Dark as Night,
Then Leave Acquaintances with Their Harness and Blinker,
Search Doggedly for the Successful Freed-Mind Thinker,
Joy in Finding One, You Speak the Same Language,
No More in TV Sports-Speak Will You Languish,
You'll Have the Strength to Climb Up and Go On,
From Bottom Land, Scientifically Indoctrinated Moron
Whose Happy World-View, Madness, Demented,
Accepting Reality which Their Masters Presented"
© Alan Watt April 14, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - April 14, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April 14, 2010. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have up there. These are all the official sites. Sometimes, in the future, you will have to use them when the big site gets overloaded, too many folk going into it or I canít upload to it. That has happened before on a few occasions. So if youíve got them bookmarked you can always download the latest shows for free. There are hundreds and hundreds of audio talks Iíve given over the years available to free download. [Official sites listed above.] As always, I plug myself from the beginning, if you call this a plug. Iím not a salesman, never intended to be. You are the audience that brings me to you. This is a pretty unique situation. I donít ask for money and believe you me, Iíve been offered it by advertisers to run the show and so on and to finance ME personally. Thatís how most hosts make their money is through advertising. The ads you hear on this show are paid directly by advertisers to RBN for the air time and for their staff, board ops, equipment and their bills, maintenance and all that stuff. If you are in a big operation, it costs a lot of money. So itís up to YOU to keep me going by purchasing the things I have for sale on my web sites. There is not a lot there. I never have the time to do it. This isnít just an hour per night that I talk here. It takes a lot of working during the day to do other things associated with this. Therefore, you can keep me going if you purchase the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to me. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] Wherever you are in the world, PayPal generally works today; well, most places. If you live in some countries like South Africa, you are best to use UPS or some other way of delivery because very little will actually get through with the regular post service; that has been found out by hard experience. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, they donít play them on computers, they play them on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
Itís up to you to keep me going. Thatís the only way I trickle over here. Iíve got bills here, satellite uploads, all that kind of stuff, from a rotten service because theyíve got a monopoly. Once in a while I get twice dial-up speed so Iím up until 2 or 3 in the morning sometimes on a bad night uploading the stuff to the site and that costs a lot of money just to do that. So try and keep me going. No one has succeeded this long before. They generally go under very quickly because people prefer the fantastic to the realistic. They want to be fascinated while they are afraid, you might say, like a horror movie. I try to give you the facts. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Last night I was talking about the geoengineering thatís been going on for years, as they pretend that they are only now discussing the possibilities of doing it, which is utter nonsense. They have been doing it for many, many years. They know the side effects and thatís really what they are discussing is how to mitigate them or keep them from the public. Itís quite easy to keep anything from the public because weíre not too bright.
The book I was using yesterday is Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base published in 1992, the bible you might say for the agenda. I put the link up last night where you can go into the site yourself, and government sites, and download this particular book. On page 433, itís got this to sayÖ remember, this is 1992.
In this chapter, a number of geoengineering options are considered. (Alan: Then they go through the different options and the hoopla to do with how it might or might not work. But they say hereÖ)
Other geoengineering possibilities include reforesting the United States (A: I guess if the people get off the land, you can reforest it. Thatís why you have the habitat areas for Agenda 21.) to increase the storage of carbon and vegetation simulating and increase in oceanic biomass as a means of increasing the storage and natural sequestering of carbon in the ocean. (A: and so on, ya-da, ya-da, ya.) Itís important to recognize (A: Listen to this, listen to this part hereÖ 1992. For those who are still in the religious phase, who use words like Ďdo you believe thisí or Ďdo you believe that, do you believe in global warming, do you believe in Y2K,í thatís a religious thing. This is 1992Ö) It is important to recognize that we are at present (A: At present means in the now, for the hard of thinking.) involved in a large project of inadvertent geoengineering by altering atmospheric chemistry and it does not seem inappropriate to inquire if there are counter measures that might be implemented to address the adverse impacts. (A: Do you understand what that just said now? Weíre back in junior school here. Letís do it again children.) It is important to recognize that WE ARE AT PRESENT INVOLVED in a large project of inadvertent geoengineering by altering atmospheric chemistry and it does not seem inappropriate to inquire if there are counter measures that might be implemented to address the adverse impacts. (A: So they knew then that there already were adverse impacts, since they are talking about countermeasures that might be implemented to address them, to alter them.)
People who can still think clearly to an extent at least and plow through their gobbledygook and their different phrases they use to make it sound very scientific, will get a lot out of it. Most folk wonít. Most folk really want to go into conspiracy sites and where itís kind of exciting. These arenít exciting things to read. Nothing that really happens or is of import is very exciting. Itís very boring, dull and dry, but itís the most important information youíll ever find in your life, when you go through this kind of stuff. So they admit they were already engaged in this project, this geoengineering project, a LARGE project they said, and itís been going on for an awful long time.
Britain, by the way, has just been warned itís in for another week of freezing sleet and snow and blizzardsÖ in April. But that doesnít matter; weíve apparently got to fry to death if they donít save us and all that rubbish. Remember, there are different reasons behind all of this. Whatís interesting too, in this Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base, it starts off with humans are the problem, right out of the Club of Rome because they are the guys that dreamt that one up and they are proud to admit it in their own book. So humansÖ itís all to get us to depopulate. Mind you, this stuff too, it does mention in the writings in the book that the side effects, some of the side effects will be sterilization of the general public and increased death rate, which is ďto their advantageĒ it says, to their ADVANTAGE. Yep. Thatís what itís about folks. No conspiracy site there. You can go into the government one and find it on their own web site.
Iíve mentioned many, many times that you cannot watch, YOU CANNOT, CANNOT WATCH TELEVISION and let your brain chill out and just get downloaded. You canít do that. You never could do that actually because weíve always been brainwashed by everything they put across there. Very clever people know your mind; they know how to entertain you and indoctrinate you at the same time. Itís really very old scams that they do, not just the ads themselves. Now the shows themselves ARE ads to get you to modify your lifestyle. Hereís the nicey-nicey story. This is the nicey-nicey one from the Wall Street Journal.
What Your TV Is Telling You to Do (A: very polite, you see.)
NBC Universal's Shows Are Sending Viewers Signals to Recycle, Exercise and Eat Right.
By AMY CHOZICK / wsj.com / April 7, 2010
In just one week on NBC, the detectives on "Law and Order" investigated a cash-for-clunkers scam, (A: Remember that, theyíve been pushing that? This just happens to be the right thing getting pushed at the right time, so itís in a story, you see.) a nurse on "Mercy" organized a group bike ride, (A: Because weíre all supposed to go bike riding now, as the czar of the transportation of the United States said that heís not pro-car at all. This is the first government thatís not pro-car; they are not going to favor the motorist at all and you are going to start riding bikes.) Al Gore made a guest appearance on "30 Rock," and "The Office" turned Dwight Schrute into a cape-wearing superhero obsessed with recycling. (A: So these are for actual programming, not ads as you see them.)
Coincidence? Hardly. NBC Universal planted these eco-friendly elements into scripted television shows to influence viewers and help sell ads.
The tacticóGeneral Electric Co.'s NBC Universal calls it "behavior placement"óis designed to sway viewers to adopt actions they see modeled in their favorite shows. (A: Guess where they got it from folks? Guess about the way that you behave, act and even swear, including the clothes that you wear, the shoes that you wear, and even your personal behavior? Youíve got it ALL from the television anyway. Thatís how they get it all to you. You are a COMPOSITE. You literally are a walking composite of whatís been brainwashed into you by Madison Avenue and the television stations. Thatís what you are.) And it helps sell ads to marketers who want to associate their brands with a feel-good, socially aware show.
Unlike with product placement, which can seem jarring to savvy viewers (A: And there are not many of them.), the goal is that viewers won't really notice that Tina Fey is tossing a plastic bottle into the recycle bin, or that a minor character on "Law and Order: SVU" has switched to energy-saving light bulbs. "People don't want to be hit over the head with it," says NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker. "Putting it in programming is what makes it resonate with viewers."
TV has always had the ability to get millions of people to mimic a beloved character. (A: And they have; thatís what you are, a composite and your friends are composites.) Ever since Carrie Bradshaw on "Sex and the City" stopped in at the Magnolia Bakery, fans of the show wait in long lines for the once-quiet shop's $2.75 cupcakes. When Jennifer Aniston as Rachel on "Friends" cut her hair, salons across the country reported requests for the shaggy, highlighted, layered look known as "the Rachel." (A: Thatís how stupid folk are.)
This is the power of persuasion that NBCU hopes to tap. "Subtle messaging woven into shows mainstreams it, and mainstreaming is an effective way to get a message across," says Lauren Zalaznick, president of NBCU Women & Lifestyle Entertainment Networks, which oversees the effort.
Since fall 2007, network executives have been asking producers of almost every prime-time and daytime show to incorporate a green storyline (A: A green storyÖ) at least once a year. (A: Itís way more than that now. Itís about every day.) The effort now takes place for a week in April and November. Starting April 19 this year, 40 NBC Universal outlets will feature some 100 hours of green-themed programming, including an episode of the Bravo reality series "Millionaire Matchmaker" in which a 39-year-old tycoon with an eco-friendly clothing line goes into a rage after his blind date orders red meat. (A: ah, ha, ha, ahÖ)
In June, NBCU plans a week in which programming will emphasize healthy eating and exercise: The idea is that viewers will watch the shows and then spring into action. "It's about incorporating a marketer's message into a thematic environment," says Mike Pilot, president of sales and marketing at NBC Universal.
While the network says it tries to incorporate green programming throughout the year, the special emphasis twice a year creates an "event" that provides opportunities to advertisers, an NBC spokeswoman says. For instance, a Wal-Mart ad focusing on locally grown produce ran this past November after an episode of the medical drama "Trauma" in which emergency medic Rabbit rescues a window washer dangling precariously from a building; medics are alerted to the situation by a man sitting in his hybrid vehicle. (A: Oh, no. [Alan laughing.] Whereís the bagÖ)
Behavior placement gives marketers extra incentive to advertise at a time when digital video recorders equip viewers with an unprecedented ability to skip commercials, says Jason Kanefsky, a media buyer at Havas's MPG. "You're not forcing your way into a program in any shape or form," he says. "You're just (A: You as the customer, you, the dumb watcher with the mouth open, you are justÖ) nodding your head at a program." (A: Ah, humÖ ah, um-hum.) ABC, CBS and FOX have plenty of product placement but haven't taken the step into behavior placement, network spokesmen say. (A: I'll read the rest of this when I come back from this break. Itís really important and what can you say, eh?)
Iím Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about how they indoctrinate you and itís quite open about it. Itís all green, environment and so on. Plus they have little quips there too about how we are destroying the planet and man is the enemy and stuff like that and youíll all lap it up as you munch your chips there and swig your pop and all the rest of it. It goes on to say hereÖ
Angela Bromstad, president of primetime entertainment at NBC, says her only specific request is that writers incorporate something related to the environment into a storyline and not make it a throwaway line of dialogue. "We haven't had any pushback," she says. (A: PushbackÖ hmm.)
Now there is another site here with a different spin on it and itís more precise perhaps. Itís from The Gawker. Iíll put the link up on my web site at the end of the show. This saysÖ
Television's Benevolent Mind Control Program (A: Thatís more accurate.)
gawker.com / Apr 7, 2010
(A: It goes on to say something, which is trueÖ we donít like the truth at times.)
America is a nation of mostly poor, unattractive people who take their cues on life from the fictional actions of rich, attractive characters on television. The NBC network, your father figure, has decided to educate our slackjawed populace. With television!
It used to be that NBC used its teevee shows' potent mind control powers only to sell us Subway sandwiches, and feebly remind us to recycle. But knowing that you, the insecure American viewer, will take the advice of fictional 30 Rock characters when it comes to selecting a carbonated beverage, NBC figured, hey, why not instruct our viewers on how to accomplish the most basic tasks that will allow them to live a moderately healthy life, without drowning to death in their couch under a tidal wave of Cheez-Its? A healthy consumer is a consumer that can purchase advertised products, as they say in our nation's scientific broadcasting academies. Therefore, the WSJ reports today, NBC has instituted "behavior placement" along with product placement in its showsóto teach you, the American Idiot, how to Be Good. (A: How to be goodÖ thatís what it is, you see. Youíll be good recycling.)
First there was Green Week. In June, NBC "will emphasize healthy eating and exercise," subtly, via the actions of characters there on the screen of your unmoving teevee.
Behavior placement gives marketers extra incentive to advertise at a time when digital video recorders equip viewers with an unprecedented ability to skip commercials, says Jason Kanefsky, a media buyer at Havas's MPG. "You're not forcing your way into a program in any shape or form," he says. "You're just nodding your head at a program." (A: ah-ha, oh, ah-haÖ thatís what you do.)
You're just nodding your head to the program. What the program says is what you will do. Fortunately, our NBC overlords are using this power for benevolent purposes. One can only imagine what could happen if it were, say, unleashed only in service of convincing us to purchase certain brands of automobiles and beauty products and 100-Calorie Snak Paxxx.
Looks like the Hypodermic Needle Theory of communications was right after all. (A: Then thereís an expletive thereÖ) ---- you, Cognitive Revolution.
Thatís what theyíre calling it, the Cognitive Revolution, as they con you further with rather blatant ways to indoctrinate you, but of course, most will never figure that out. They will go, Oh, thereís Al Gore in this comedy, ah-ha, haÖ you know. Thatís how they are, and nod their heads. Yeah, they will indeed nod their heads. Thatís how it works.
When you really get into things, thatís what all television is all about and it always has been. Right after 9/11 when they talked about the joint integration of Canada and the US forces for the border and everything, out came a series called Ė and Canada is very good at very exciting titles Ė The Border. I think they were stopping terrorists on one of the main crossover bridges, Niagara Falls I think, in the first episode; something thatís never happened. But there ya go; thereís terrorism everywhere and thatís how you get brainwashed, through fiction. Promiscuity was done full through fiction, masses of fiction. Arenít you doing the same; donít you just hop around? No. well, everybody is doing it; look at that. Then lives of the rich and famous, well, theyíre all doing it; Iíd better do the same, hey, ohÖ Composite peopleÖ Composite people. Thatís what it is.
This article here I read before and itís worth reading again. It ties in with the chemical spraying they are doing in the skies. The article I read yesterday, the book, their bible of weather warfare basically, starting off with too many people and really what they are saying is too many of the wrong sort of people, the obsolete types now that weíve no longer got any industry and there is hardly any economy. This article is from the Washington Examiner.
Obama's Science Czar:
Traditional family is obsolete, punish large families
By: David Freddoso - Online Opinion Editor / washingtonexaminer.com / 07/15/09
President Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren, took a controversial and amoral approach to the science of population by recommending mass compulsory sterilization and even forced abortion (and/or forced marriages) (A: Thatís for the better types, the ones that wouldnít marry but they had the better genes.) under certain circumstances. (A: Heís in there now. Heís in there with this gang of collectivists at the top who want to help their masters dominate the planet. John Holdren.) His 1977 tome, Ecoscience, which he co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, also displays a revealing disregard for the institution of the traditional human family. (A: It says in that other book I read too, from the government there, their bible, that they family had to be destroyed for this purpose. It starts to make sense eventually doesnít it? I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article, Obama's Science Czar, John Holdren, says traditional families are obsolete. He says punish large families and he goes on to say hereÖ
Holdren and the Ehrlichs write:
Radical changes in family structure and relationships are inevitable, (A: They knew that because we are already under attack, again, through the media and entertainment, which never showed you a healthy marriage. Everybody was always arguing all the time and it was just chaotic and so on.) whether population control is instituted or not. Inaction, attended by a steady deterioration in living conditions for the poor majority, will bring changes everywhere that no one could consider beneficial. Thus, it is beside the point to object to population-control measures simply on the grounds that they might change the social structure or family relationships. (A: What he is saying is they are kaput anyway because they were making sure they were kaput and thatís happened. So they are going ahead.)
Holdren, with a blithe ďof course,Ē encourages government to wage an effective war on the family in America. It begins with the abolition of ďpronatalistĒ policies and continues with their complete reversal: (A: This is what he advocated. Heís in there now folks. Youíd betterÖ if you can understand what they put in at the right time. This is the right time to put them in. Their masters know what they are doing. It wasnít the voters who put these guys in. I hope the people out there realize that.)
As United States taxpayers know, income tax laws have long implicitly encouraged marriage and childbearing...Such a pronatalist bias of course is no longer appropriate. In countries that are affluent enough for the majority of citizens to pay taxes, tax laws could be adjusted to favor (instead of penalize) single people, working wives, and small families. Other tax measures might also include high marriage fees, taxes on luxury baby goods and toys, and removal of family allowances where they exist. Other possibilities include the limitation of maternal or educational benefits to two children per family.
Holdren notes that some of these proposals ďhave the potential disadvantage of heavily penalizing children (and in the long run society as well).Ē This is not a disqualifier, though, as long as the proposals are ďcarefully adjusted to avoid denying at least minimum care for poor families, regardless of the number of children they may have.Ē Even here, the objection is practical, not ethical. It's fine to level stiff penalties against those who choose families and children, but not to the point that this policy exacerbates the original problem (unwanted children, living in squalor) that population control purports to combat.
Some Americans might cite the Founding Fathers and argue that a government whose policy is to make war on the family in the name of science has clearly overstepped its mandate. That was not the opinion expressed by John Holdren, the man President Obama has put in charge in the nation's science policy.
Put in charge at the RIGHT time and so are the other creeps behind him. Believe you me, they are no different from the creeps that were there before with the previous guy. See, they use them for different purposes and it was time to put this guy in to do this, martial law, blah, blah, blah and itís time to put this guy in to bring in the collectivist agenda. Itís much easier for fascists to run you when youíre all run under a collectivist/communist style system under a massive bureaucracy. Far easier. Everything is working like clockwork and now itís time for this and time for that. Thatís how it works.
From Fox News, this is an article to do withÖ actually it starts off with sexual health. Of course, they always put these quack things in for the doctors and stuff. There is an article calledÖ
Is Soda Bad for Sperm?
(A: The pop that you drink. I told you for years that whatever you are made to like and becomes popular is designed for other purposes. Iíve gone through the bisphenol-A in the pop bottles and the water bottles and all that kind of stuff and the phthalates they have too, that sterilize males. A lot of this stuff if also in cosmetics used by women; itís vastly over laden with the stuff. It goes through the skin - insufflation itís called - into the blood stream and it will literally alter the sexuality or the behavior of a boy, if she is doing this stuff between the age of 8 and 12 weeks in gestation. They knew this back in the 1800s, what these particular chemicals did, these synthetic hormones. But itís in EVERYTHING. Well, here is soda, another thing that they made popular. Water was never good enough and orange juice wasnít good enough so you get soda. This stuff is in all your favorite soft drinks.)
Tuesday , March 30, 2010 / foxnews.com
Men who drink about a quart or more of soda every day could be causing harm to their sperm, results of a Danish study hint.
On average, these men's sperm counts were almost 30 percent lower than in men who didn't drink soda. While most of the sperm counts would still be considered normal by the World Health Organization, (A: See, sterility is normal by the World Health Organization. Thatís why, when they quote the figures that you are down BY 85% of sperm compared to men of 1952 or so, there is no crisis mentioned by the World Health Organization. They just give you the quotes like we are quite happy with that.) men with fewer sperm generally have a higher risk of being infertile. (A: I love these guys; they are so bright; they are so clever. Imagine putting that together.)
The link is unlikely to be due to caffeine, the researchers say, because coffee did not have the same effect, even though its caffeine content is higher. Instead, other ingredients in the beverage or an unhealthy lifestyle could be involved.
"It's important to note that the men who drank a lot of cola were also different in many other ways," (A: I bet they were.) Dr. Tina Kold Jensen of Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, told Reuters Health.
Kold Jensen, who led the new research, said only a few studies have looked at caffeine's impact on reproductive health in men. The participants have generally been a very select group, such as infertile men, and the results have been conflicting. (A: So thatís basically soft drinks, caffeine and obviously phthalates are there but they donít mention it here because itís in plastic bottles, all these soft drinks that they come into.)
There is also one Iíll put up too that is entitledÖ Is drinking water safe for you? If you skip the first ĺ, itís one of these TV doc type guys, these TV quacks they bring on and ĺ of it is pabulum, but then he gets into the heart of the matter. Heís actually saying that water itself now is so laden with artificial estrogens that itís definitely having an effect on the males in society. Iíll put that link up as well.
Of course, this is all just pure chance and coincidence and all that kind of stuff. It could never fall in with a depopulation program thatís been going on since and written about since the 1900s. Thatís just paranoid thinking. Thatís conspiracy stuffÖ oh, ho, oh. Isnít it? Even though Canada has recognized the dangers of the phthalates and so on and claimed that they were taking it out of the supply; studies were done afterwards, mind you, and I read them on the air, and they said no, they are still there. I guess they are vital to have, eh? Yeah, the one, how water CAN make you fat. Thatís how it comes on actually.
Water CAN make you fat:
How chemicals in drink can trigger weight gain and fertility problems
By Professor Adam Carey / 28th March 2010 / dailymail.co.uk
(A: Water, eh, it can make you fat. Then it goes on about his long, long quacky spiel here and then he tries to say thatÖ)
Our tap water is, by and large, safe and mostly free of the bugs that cause the gastric infections and waterborne diseases in other parts of the world. (A: And pabulum, pabulumÖ But then he goes down to the real part of it, near the bottom.)
Among these are the so-called gender-bending chemicals such as Bisphenol A (BPA) - used in the manufacture of plastics such as babies' bottles - which various studies have linked to reproductive difficulties, as well as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
A recent study by Harvard School of Public Health found that those who drank from bottles made with BPA showed a two-thirds increase of the chemical in their urine.
Other chemical derivatives to get into our water include oestrogen compounds.
These can come from pesticides and herbicides that wash off from soil into our rivers. (A: and of course itís dosed on your veggies as well by the big GMO boys.)
Oestrogen is the hormone that stimulates female characteristics in women at puberty.
Synthetically it is used in the oestrogenbased oral contraceptive pill. Again this is excreted in urine and gets into our water supply.
An excessive amount of oestrogen in the body not only drives certain cancers such as specific types of breast cancer, but also affects the way we accumulate fat. (A: Well I guarantee you, after looking around at some of the people in towns, it affects them in other ways as well and in a lot of the guys too. )
So the more we are exposed to oestrogen, or chemicals that act like it, the harder it is to lose body fat. And an increase in body fat has been linked to many illnesses including heart disease and cancer.
Meanwhile, we have to consider the population-wide drop in sperm concentration which has plummeted, according to the British Fertility Society, by about 30 per cent, as well as the fact that Britain seems to be gripped by a fertility crisis.
So is America, the US, and Canada. I read the reports last year on that. 85% DOWN it is actually. Weíve actually got about 25%, actually if youíre lucky, 25% VIRILE sperm and half of those sperm tested Ė in the articles I put up on the internet from major mainstream media and scientific studies Ė only half of that is mobile and has the ability to find its target. But there is no crisis, mind you. No crisis at all. Itís just like the new allergies that pop out, you know. We have sudden new allergies. Itís a new normal and scientists are baffled, of course. They wonít put any money into finding out why everyone is allergic now and children are allergic to everything. It started off with peanuts for some children and now, goodness sake, we are becoming allergic to our VEGETABLES AND FRUIT. Iíll put that article up as well.
Fruit and vegies new allergy fear
STEPHEN CAUCHI / farmonline.com.au / 19 Apr, 2009
When humans become allergic to their FOOD, you are going down a very fast slippery dark tunnel folks. Because, you see, all you got left is food and waterÖ and you are kaput. But, ah, itís no crisis mind you. If you go back to John Holdrenís stuff, heís in for depopulation and bringing the population down by ANY and ALL means possible. Are you beginning to get whatís happening? And Holdren is only ONE of MANY of these mass psychopathic murders who are in top positionsÖ on behalf of their masters.
But those who are John Doe and Jane Doe, who sit and watch the TV and laugh and giggle and chomp on their chips will never get it and youíve got to really get to understand that you cannot help these people. They are BEYOND it. They are GONE. They are in the land of moroni. They are morons. Seriously folks, they are morons. Some of the people out there, some of us have been morons but we came out of moron land into enlightenment land because we CHOSE to. But a lot of people prefer to stay in moron land because there are moreÖ People are generally, instincts ofÖ they are SOCIAL CREATURES. They like to be in big crowds and safety in numbers. So the more morons who agree with the propaganda and indoctrination, the safer they feel. You have to really accept that. Honestly.
Donít kill yourself trying to get through to your nearest and dearest, or whoever it happens to be, year after year and cause all that dissention. There is no point. Use your skills and your time, save yourself an ulcer and try to help those who are ASKING THE QUESTIONS regardless of the age they are atÖ regardless of the age. I had a nephew once; he was about 11 or 12 years of age. He said to me, you know thatís just disgusting. I says, whatís disgusting? He says, that Tina Turner. I says, why is that? He watched her on television and she was dancing around there in a mini skirt and a whole thing and itís all about raunchy sex and these girls behind her are all raunchy sex and stuff. He says, because sheís a grandmother. This is a 12 year oldÖ She is a grandmother acting like a whore. I thought, well, that youngster has got promise. Heís got the ability to come out of moron land, moroni land. Some people have it very early, other ones it takes years of knocking their heads against the brick walls and following politics and stuff, believing in it all, before they decide to leave moron land behind them and come into the light. But donít kill yourself. Please donít kill yourself. I get so many letters from folk. Iím trying to wake up my wife, my husband, my whoever, my brother and sister, and itís like an ongoing EGO battle for years. Thatís really what it ends up boiling down to is just battles. I should be able with all I know to persuade this person and they will understand. No. They CHOOSE not to understand. They do chooseÖ not to understand.
Nothing out there in todayís society is out by chance. We are living in a scientific dictatorship. We were BORN into a scientific run dictatorship. Governance is an ART of governing people through various means, of which they are completely oblivious, to get desired results, to get them to GO ALONG like a blind herd. Thatís what governance means. Iíve read the articles. Itís a system where they people who are governed have NO say whatsoever in the direction of the laws and the forces that are acting upon them. There are no complaints departments. There is no involvement. There is no democratic Ďwe can speak to them and have our say.í Itís not there, outside of the humoring aspect of it.
When they give us all your social networking system - and they gave you the internet in the first place - it was ALWAYS to bring you to a stage where they would monitor every single individual. That was the purpose of it. You canít stop, again, the herd from jumping at things. They like toys. The like their friends. Donít you want to be in touch with your friends? Do you know how many friends you really have in your life when you go through it? Do you really, really know? You are lucky if youíve got a couple. Most folk are lucky if theyíve got one. You are getting rather confused concerning ACQUAINTANCES and very vague at that because you donít know who they are on these different sites that you go into and who you Twitter with. A lot of them are set-ups as well. It could even be a computer that is pulling your leg.
Study Says Almost Half Of Americans Use Social Networks
Friday, April 09, 2010 - by Jennifer Johnson / hothardware.com
According to a recent survey from Arbitron and Edison Research, nearly half of Americans age 12 and older have a profile on one or more social networking Web sites. The study also revealed that the use of social networking sites is not limited to youth: Approximately 78% of teens and 77% of 18 to 24-year-olds have personal profile pages. Nearly two-thirds of Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 have personal profile pages.
Not only are more people using social networking sites in general, but they're also using them more frequently. The study suggests that 30% of Americans with a social networking profile access the social networking Web site several times a day. One year ago, only 18% of the same group said they used the site multiple times a day. (A: And what does that lead to? Well, it leads to this particular site tooÖ)
Big Brother is Indeed Watching You: The Spy Side of Social Networking
Posted by Brian Sommer / zdnet.com / April 6th, 2010
(A: Just to fit in on the happy PR one, of the one I read before. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.† Just a quick article on this company called Teneros, one of many companies actually, outside of the CIA collecting all your data which they do. Itís actually getting stored apparently in the Congressional Records somewhere.
The CIA will soon have nothing on the social networking watchdogs. Teneros has launched a product that is designed to let a company monitor its employeesí social networking activities. (A: Then it goes into the reason theyíd want to basically check up on its employees. Whistleblowers are one reason it says here too, but itís now automated. This system is automated now.) Now its automated Ė employers can discover and monitor their employeesí Facebook and Twitter posts and tweets Ė with more sites promised (YouTube, MySpace, and LinkedIn, for example).
So, you know. But you canít stop the lemmings can you? You canít stop the lemmings from wanting to be a star. I guess thatís what it is. They want to be a star. I want to be up there. I want people to know MEÖ you know. And all you have are these little text messages from your FRIENDS. [Alan laughing.]
There is a caller from California, Peter. Are you there Peter?
Peter: Yes, I am Alan. Hi. How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Peter: Okay. Well, aside from you hitting all the fun points that are on my mind right now, there are some pretty crazy things going on here as well. Just to touch up on what you were saying about the Facebook and the social networking program, they were never meant to be about, you know, you and I, for example. All it was, was a basic structure set up for in the future, in order to determine the patterns in life that we go through. Everyone is always posting on these Facebooks and Twitters what they are doing. In order to find that pattern, right, and then once they are able to find out, okay these people do this, these people do that, they can make plans for us later in the future because they want to predict Ė you always talk about predictive programming and I believe thatís obviously one of their tactics. But my question to you is and Iím always talking about the New World Order to a lot of people that I know and they are always saying, when is it going to be here, when is it going to be here. Iím always saying, itís already here.† But nobodyÖ you know, everyone is already caught up in their day-to-day lives. I just kind of wanted to see what you thought about that.
Alan: We are living right through it. When Bush Sr first said it in I think it was 1990, September the 11th, of course, of 1990 AND again on September 11th 1991. He said he saw the New World Order coming into view, a New World Order, and the thousand points of light that are the big foundations and NGO that are spearheading it and private corporations. We were already going into it then and it was really kicked off with the Century of Change in 2001. Thatís when the century began was 2001, not 2000. That was to kick it right off there. They were right on cue like the big business plan that they have. You are quite correct with that. I read the article from the Pentagonís own release saying they have an artificial system where every one of us is IN that system, a composite of us in their virtual reality, and it updates itself DAILY by ALL our messages, email, and so on. It updates us all. It knows the clusters of friends that we have, what we all have in common, what your behaviors are Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday through to Friday, Saturday to Sunday and if you change your behavior in the future you will get a knock on the door and they will want to know why because now youíve become unpredictable. For totalitarians, they have always said, everyone MUST be predictable in this kind of society which they are bringing in. So thatís what itís for. You are quite right. This is all designed before they gave us the first little taste of the internet. Step by step they had it worked out in advance. Give them this little bit, then give them that little bit of cheese, and weíve had lots of cheese, until we end up at the end in the trap. Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Entertainment Programs You-Examples
Television's "Benevolent" Mind Control Program
Be Very, Very Afraid- Holdren's Proposals-Destruction of Families, Forced Abortion and More
Soda Pop= Low Sperm Count
Bisphenol A and Estrogen in Drinking Water
Vegetables join Peanuts in Rapid Increase of Allergies to Food
Study on Social Networking Sites and Users
Spy Side of Social Networking
Transcribed by Diana