April 8, 2010 (#551)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt April 8, 2010:
Money Makes the World Go Around,
By Debt-Slavery We Truly Are Bound:
"We're Aboard Ship Earth, Coursed as Planned,
With a Motley Crew of Saints and The Damned,
Admiral and Officers are From Different Seed,
Barking Orders to Men of Lesser Breed,
Admiral IMF is the Navigator,
Captain CFR is Everywhere as Motivator,
Petty Officer Foundations Selects from the Crew,
Men for NGO Club, The Dependable Few,
First Mate Law, Lists Gossip, From Wherever it Hails,
And Lashes with Gusto, His Cat o'Nine Tails,
The Ship Set Out with One Main Objective,
To Conquer the Globe, The Order Directive,
When Evening Dispatches Sent, Officers Raise Thanks
To Their Masters of Everything, Owners of World Banks"
© Alan Watt April 8, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - April 8, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on April 8th 2010. Newcomers, you should always look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. In there you will find hundreds and hundreds of talks Iíve given over the past few years for download for free. You can also bookmark the other official sites Iíve got listed there on that front page because some times too many people go into the .com site at the same time and it tends to make sticky downloads. Sometimes I canít even upload to the .com; they donít increase my bandwidth although they are supposed to, my disk space. So you can always have an alternate site to go to if you bookmark those sites. [Official sites listed above.] Remember that you are the audience that brings me to you every night. Very few hosts have tried it this way before. The ones in the past have always gone under because the public donít support them. They will pay money to get into archives and different things from other sites, especially the ones that fascinate them, with people with alligator shoes or UFOs and stuff like that and MIX FACT AND FICTION in with what they call the Patriot Movement. So those are very, very important sites, very fascinating indeed. People like to get fascinated more than they like to get educated and that is their choice, of course. Those that try to go my way generally go under. The ads that you hear on this show go straight to RBN from the advertisers; they bypass me completely. That pays RBN to broadcast the show. It pays for their board ops, their bills, and all the other things that they have to do, and the transmission itself. So YOU have to support me by looking into my web sites, buy my books; they are different from anyone elseís, I guarantee you that. I donít write them in the linear fashion, textbook style youíve been brainwashed to think that way and to reason that way even. The boys at the top do not think in a linear fashion, thatís why they always beat you. So go in and buy my books, buy the disks I have for sale or you can donate to me and that will make me just tick over, hopefully, because Iíve got a lot of expenses at this end as you can imagine. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
Hopefully I can last a little bit longer because, really, Iím up in the air whether I should just keep going or just go off into the sunset and do other things which will actually pay me and I certainly have other opportunities in many different fields to do so. However, what we are going through right now is very, very important and I try to at least share the knowledge that I have. Iím grateful too, that at least Iíve woken up a lot of people into a much bigger way of looking at the whole world, not just their little area or their little countries and so on, and to show them that the international agendas that have been going on since long before you were born. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve mentioned for years that the big boys work with an agenda always in mind. They do set target dates for implementation of parts of the agenda and they never change. They never alter the times and pick other dates. They never deviate from their plans. You can count on them when they tell you whatís going to happen. Itís not done through your government per se, itís done through guys in government who belong to the Council on Foreign Relations generally, from the Council on Foreign Relationís own web site.
Itís interesting to me to see how during election times you are told very little about politicians, who they actually are. You are told all you NEED to know about them, as far as the big boys are concerned, or at least what you are supposed to believe about them. Seldom do they ever tell you the associations they belong to already, which part are they going to play, which part is this left-winger going to play, which part is this right-winger going to play, and all that nonsense because they all work for the same bosses, you see. Itís the Hegelian dialectic and it always has been for an awful long time. They use the left and right wing while nothing ever changes except the agenda steamrolls ahead regardless of who pretends to be in power and we pretend to believe them.
When Tony Blair was in, for instance, I mean he was a nobody who was picked at university and trained by people like Isaiah Berlin who put his name in to the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs as a likely candidate because he was a yes-man. He would do whatever he was told, I mean ANYTHING he was told, and as long as he was going to be well rewarded, which he certainly has been since he left office. Thatís how the world really works. He belonged to the Fabian Society. Iíve gone over the history of the Fabian Society before, heavily funded by the Milner Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, also by the Astor Foundation and other foundations to manage what people though was going to be the left wing, the RADICAL left wing in fact.
The founding members were very, very much into the new type of socialism, at the same time that they came into Nazi Germany in fact. In the movie, The Soviet Story Ė excellent movie to see, a documentary, itís got so much in it Ė to show you what itís all about. What it really did show you is that what really Soviet and Fascist was one and the same thing. Thatís why you had the Stalin-Hitler Pact because they had so much in common. Even though one would shout later on Ďfascistí and another one would shout Ďcommunistí; they had so much in common. It really is a totalitarian way of controlling masses of people with a massive bureaucracy using a sort of socialist/collectivist mentality over the masses to control them so that an elite could rule them at the top. Both the Soviet system and the Nazi system had big international corporations working with them from the very beginning. In fact, they were really funded by them and the banks of the Western world; BOTH of them were. They show you there what socialism really is all about on behalf of the masters at the top, the very rich masters who truly own it.
Part of it was depopulation, especially beginning with what they declared were the Ďunfití members of society. George Bernard Shaw in a very rare piece of footage, Iím sure there is lots of footage of him but we never get access to it, as you know, even though Iím sure the BBC has thousands and thousands of reels on him. He spoke in behalf of the Fabians and he said that perhaps we should get the scientists to work on a painless, humane gas that would kill off all the unfit in the country. So you know where Hitler got his idea from. In fact, Hitler copied everything that they said in the West in Europe and Britain. That was part of their whole agenda.
Part of it too, in the Fabian Society, was to bring in a world under ORDER, their order, the natural intelligentsia with the money who obviously proved the survival of the fittest and stayed at the top of the tree. Thatís how they literally decide they ARE the best survivors. They are sticking rich, theyíve kept a hold of it for generations, they dominate millions of people, therefore they are the natural fit rulers. This cumbersome nonsense of democracy is really a good sham to keep the people under control while you go ahead with your Brave New World scenario.
Tony Blair belonged to the Fabian Society, as does Mr Brown who presently is the Prime Minister of Britain. They also belong to the Socialist International, they call it. I donít know if itís the second or third or fourth, they keep changing it. They push in these socialist policies on behalf of the richest men on the planet. But Blair did say, and this was exposed in the newspapers. Iíll try and find the link.
'Dishonest' Blair and Straw accused
over secret plan for multicultural UK
By Simon Walters, Mail on Sunday Political Editor / 25th October 2009 / dailymail.co.uk
I read it on the air about a month ago maybe, where Blair had said to his right-hand man, my job here is to so alter the face of Britain by MASSIVE immigration of the most diverse Ė diverse meaning opposite Ė cultures that the British way of life, the culture would be completely destroyed, it could never get itself back together. That was part of his agenda and he really opened the floodgates to immigration. You see the fallout of it today as Mr Blair goes on and is so well rewarded. I think heís got £20 or £30 million given to him through various means for what he did as Prime Minister. Thatís how they pay them off. The fallout hits the rest of society, never mind about crime and all the rest of it. It says hereÖ
Labour's betrayal of British workers: Nearly every one of 1.67m jobs created since 1997 has gone to a foreigner
By James Chapman / dailymail.co.uk / 8th April 2010
Immigration was at the centre of the election campaign today (Alan: Of course the conservatives will hype that up and change nothing.) as it emerged that virtually every extra job created under Labour has gone to a foreign worker. (A: Priority hiring, you see.)
Figures suggested an extraordinary 98.5 per cent of 1.67million new posts were taken by immigrants.
The Tories (A: the Conservatives) seized on the revelation as evidence that the Government has totally failed to deliver its pledge of 'British jobs for British workers'. (A: Ah, but itís not really that. Youíve got to understand that they are also bringing in their extended families from these diverse cultures. In fact, in the United States and Canada and Britain people from those, what they call, diverse cultures that still have extended families, they can bring them all in. But if you go to any other country, even from Britain to Canada, you canít bring all YOUR family in, unless you belong to one of these diverse cultures. Then that hits the health care system too. In fact some of them, itís been in the papers here, go right on; some of the elderly ones go right into nursing homes. They havenít paid a penny into any of this and it gets people very irate.)
As Gordon Brown tried to fight on the economy and cleaning up politics, he was confronted in the Commons about how British people of working age have lost out.
Shadow (A: ShadowyÖ) immigration minister Damian Green revealed unpublished figures showing there are almost 730,000 fewer British-born workers in the private sector than in 1997.
Mr Green said the Tories would reduce net migration to tens of thousands a year from the peaks of 200,000 under Labour by enforcing an annual cap.
(A: Of course, they are not going to change itÖ ) Mr Brown rejected the idea of an immigration quota (A: reduction), which he said would do 'great damage to British business'.
Really, the real thing behind it, of this mush society of diverse cultures where literally you go through a period of massive chaos and fallout and violence between different groups until it settles down. This is what they decided back in, I think itís 1917 or so, in the Fabian Society. It reminds me of what Mr Rockefeller said at one of his meetings when he was talking about the similar thing to the United States and the rest of the world. He said, well, you canít make an omelet without breaking eggs. So the fallout for maybe 50 years, or mayhem and all this kind of stuff, thatís all it is, itís just an omelet getting put together and this is tough luck, you see. Thatís ACCEPTABLE. All that fallout is acceptable. They are not suffering at the top, of course. They donít even mix with any of the ordinary people of ANY class or ANY ethnic group. They donít mix with it, so they can watch the eggs cracking all around them I guess. So thatís the world you live in because we live through a big agenda, big world plan.
Whatís interesting too, everyone is going on right nowÖ Itís interesting how feeds get put out to the internet. They have names for this because the government itself has specialized teams and cyber warfare experts and so on putting out stuff and watching it run around the internet in circles. Sure enough, everybody goes along with it like a big wave and prattle on about it. So we are GIVEN the things to prattle on about and complain about, to be honest with you. Thatís why I tend to go into the actual CFR meetings, the big foundationsí meetings, the big NGO meetings and their own web sites and show you whatís really going on most of the time. When you read the media, believe you me, itís put out there for you regardless of what they are saying.
What so many are on about now was an article put out, a statement put out by Moodyís where Moodyís had mentioned that the US and Britain especially, better start really working hard to manage their books and put in all the unpopular mandates theyíll have to put in to save the economy, meaning the banking system. ĎUnpopularí means through massive taxation because how else are they going to get anything; itís always through tax. Governments do nothing but tax, you see; thatís what they do. And spend your tax money, generally not on you. What they were also saying, it might disturb social cohesion. What that means, in their parlance, is the same terminology used in the military departmentsí exposťs they put out too for the Department of Defence which Iíve read on the air - 90 pages - and one from the United States too, that there could be riots starting if they donít mandate these unpopular policies and make us all poor. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just discussing about the waves that are sent around all media and the internet and everyone prattles about them on cue, as we are supposed to do. One of them was Moodyís of course making the statements that social cohesion could be put in jeopardy and that the US and Britain might end up with riots similar to Greece and Spain and so on. There is an article out on that too.
No room for error on U.S. debt
By Colin Barr, senior writer - cnn.com / March 16, 2010
(A: Theyíre talking about cutting back on spending and if itís done too soon that weíd risk a double-dip recession and all that kind of stuff. Itís all managed perfectly at the top, believe you me. Which ever way that they go is what they want and the outcome too will be what they want. They do say it will test social cohesion, which means there will be riots and so on. It saysÖ)
Nor can big developed countries expect to export their way to health on the back of booms in emerging markets such as India and China. (A: Of course not, thatís why they set up India and China.)
China didnít drag itself up to be the main manufacturer of the planet. The Western powers that OWN the Western countries, through the governments which they own as well, got the GATT going, the General Agreement of Trade and Tariffs, and agreed to send everything offshore and encourage all the factories to move offshore to China. Actually they used the taxpayersí money to do so to get them across to China and to set up the new factories in China. YOU funded all that, all you unemployed folk out there in the West, and your governments were responsible on behalf of their masters. You were also responsible for paying for any losses incurred during the first 10 years of operating business. Did your major media bother telling you about that? No, of course not. Well they set up China too and India and believe you me, and there is to be nothing to replace it back home. This is a service economy, discussed as far back as the 70s that thatís what they had planned for the US, Great Britain and a few other countries, service economies. So Iíll put these articles up on my web sites at the end of the show if XplorNet, which I pay a lot of money to get uploading through their satellite system, gives me more than double dial-up speed.
Another good editorial is from the Washington Post. Itís a bit more satisfactory than the last one. It saysÖ
EDITORIAL: Global warming's unscientific method
THE WASHINGTON TIMES / Wednesday, April 7, 2010
The prophets of global warming continue to lament as their carefully crafted yarn unravels before their eyes. Ross McKitrick, an intrepid economics professor from the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, has tugged apart the thin mathematical threads that once held together the story of climate change.
Recent attempts to silence Mr. McKitrick illuminate the extent to which the alarmists have abandoned proper scientific method in their pursuit of political goals. (A: Now, they havenít abandoned a darn thing folks. If you notice the laws are getting passed, and theyíve been passed, that you are going to be taxed into the grave for carbon taxes and on your vehicles and all the rest of it and all the energy. This is all the same scenario under the guise of saving the world from freezing or heating, you see, which ever way it goesÖ which has gone on for millions of years.)
Mr. McKitrick has spent the past two years attempting to publish a scientific paper (A: I told you over the last few nights that if you think that science is somehow impartial to politics, forget it. Science, really, is under the dictate of politics. Itís always used by politics, ALWAYS. And if you donít go along with them you are frozen right out, as weíve already noticed by different articles that have emerged for what the IPCC has done to different scientists, some of whom are on their boards, and they said that this is hogwash, it doesnít stand up to scientific investigation. Well, they were completely ostracized and the big magazines were told not to publish any of their works. This is what goes on. This is ALL politics. Everything is politics.) that documents a fundamental error in the 2007 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. This U.N. document serves as the sole authority upon which the Environmental Protection Agency based its December "endangerment finding" that will allow unelected bureaucrats to impose cap-and-trade-style regulations without a vote of Congress. The cost to the public in higher gas and energy prices will run in the billions. (A: Itís going to run you off the road actually, thatís part of the intention of it.)
One might think that the scientific community would be extra diligent in double-checking the conclusions of a report carrying such weighty real-world consequences. In fact, the opposite happened. Seven scientific journals circled the wagons to block publication of Mr. McKitrick's explosive findings. (A: Heís a professor, this guy.)
The IPCC report argued that temperatures rose one degree Celsius over the course of a century as a direct result of man-made carbon-dioxide emissions. This tiny change in temperature was calculated through the use of an "adjusted" set of global surface-temperature readings. (A: Special computers designed for the purpose.) Mr. McKitrick found that factors unrelated to global climate contaminated this data set, resulting in a higher temperature reading. (A: Lots of exposťs have been done on their bogus readings.) He showed a statistically significant correlation between the change in temperature readings and socioeconomic indicators. It makes sense, for example, that replacing trees and forests with concrete and glass skyscrapers might contribute to the .01 degree annual increase in local temperature readings. This "urban heat island" effect would not be present in readings taken outside the asphalt jungle. (A: They are taking all the readings from the middle of the concrete jungles, folks. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve read articles from people, in some countries that are more socialized than others, complaining about the US and so on and saying, well, you know, itís much better where we are because weíve got the socialized health care and all that. Well, listen, if government wants to give you a system that works, you will have it. However, if they want to take it down, which they will, believe you me, once youíre all pacified and dependent, they will do that too because the World Health Organization is ultimately in charge of all the health care systems and their policies, as it is with everything else and every other policy to do with health or housing or anything else. They want the most MINIMAL care to be available across the world and anything above minimal care will depend on your necessity to your community, your SOCIAL STANDING. So enjoy it while youíve got it because it wonít lastÖ as they hammer away at the US and everywhere else.
The countries that still have bits of it like Canada and Britain are in a mess already because they were designed to go down eventually. I know guys who worked in the system back in the 1970s in Canada at top levels who were told at meetings, that come around the late 80s and through the 90s they would start drumming the beat for Ďcrisis in health careí. Thatís all weíve heard as they were slashing back, slashing back, starting on mandates with the rural hospitals which were very good hospitals. They were all paid by the people in the areas through their taxes. It was done through Bob Rae in Canada and other ones in the United States and other ones across Canada too, other local Prime Ministers, I call them, the provincial ones.
The idea was, under the Agenda 21 plan coming up, weíd all be living in habitat corridors along side the major highways which are just being finished now. Thatís where everyone is to get crowded into and into the major cities that are all interlinked together. Youíve got to read the real reports, itís the only way youíll make sense of anything happening and you might start initially saying, isnít that a coincidence; I read that in that report 2 years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago and here it is happening. Eventually, youíll catch on folks. You will catch on; your world in the future is planned that way. Hopefully, if you canít catch on, then please donít email me.
Here is an article about the US and the way itís going. Again, from the Washington Times.
EDITORIAL: Close enough for government work
THE WASHINGTON TIMES / Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Part of President Obama's health care bill (A: Itís not his, you know that. Hillary Clinton was talking about that and they were working on it while she was up there.) depends on the government telling doctors and hospitals what are purportedly the most efficient medical procedures they should use. (A: So you see, there are bureaucrats now telling the doctors what procedures they should use. The RAND Corporation was employed to find how to cut costs and all directions.) Americans are supposed to trust Mr. Obama's bureaucrats over their own doctors. (A: See, your doctors will become, as they do, government agents under a federal health care system. Youíve got to understand that.) Meanwhile, a new report from the Government Accountability Office shows that the Obama administration has been an utter failure at identifying the efficiency of a wide range of products. As government encroaches on more aspects of American life, the federal bureaucracy is increasingly incompetent. (A: Öas it expands, because it is really expanding.)
The Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy are charged with identifying how energy-efficient different products are. They claim that 98 percent of the products they test meet or exceed Energy Star requirements, which are government benchmarks used to regulate greater efficiency. Yet a sting by GAO investigators showed that the government agencies incorrectly identified as "efficient" 15 of 20 bogus products submitted by GAO for testing. No action was taken on two of the 20 products. Overall, the government made the correct decision on 11 percent of the test products.
Actually, Iíve got another article here; Iíll try and find it. Itís very important; it ties in with this because I donít know if you know that recently the big pharma made a deal with the United States government to substitute different ingredients in their pharmaceutical products. The mainstream I donít think mentioned it but I have the articles here from the corporations involved and from the US government. Itís to make them cheaper and cheaper, you see, and they will obviously lose their efficacy as you put in substitute ingredients. Youíll be paying the same amount of money for them, they will still be called the same products, there will also be different side effects with them which will become apparent over a while as they deny it, mind you. What was interesting too, was because of the hullabaloo about thimerosal, or mercury in the vaccine shots and the public wisening up to it, they have agreed that pharma will no longer have to label that on any of their inoculations. And, by the way, Iím not kidding you, Iíll try and find this, it said, they can also up the quantity of thimerosal up to 3-4 times the present allowable standard. Just to let you know. Just to let you know about that. Thatís for your new health care system, you see. Everything is for a political agenda and depopulation certainly is a political agenda. So thatís that article there, as the doctors become government agents as the bureaucrats run the doctorsí lives.
Believe you me, they are politicized too. They will do what they are told; all professions, psychiatry especially since they have been a tool all down the years for regimes. They lock away people with conflicting opinions. Here is a part here from a very good book, for those whoíve got a brain to follow because believe you me, itís not easy reading. Youíve got to really go through a blow by blow, what I did, what they said, what I did then, what they said account of one manís taking on the Soviet regime in the Soviet Union, when it was the Soviet Union, when they locked away people who had different opinions than the authorized ones. Itís called A Question of Madness: Repression by Psychiatry in the Soviet Union by Zhores A Medvedev and Roy A Medvedev, his brother. His brother fought like crazy going through ALL the different bureaucratic levels, being given the runaround and so on because they locked up his brother. Why? Because he came out with articles on the genes of plants and biology and so on which differed from a HERO, a Soviet hero scientist. His ideas, which are all wonkey actually, but Stalin loved him, Lisinkov I think it was. His crazy ideas were told this is now the authorized mandate and belief system of this particular area of science.
Well, itís no different than the IPCC who have done the same blocking of professors who will not go along with their political agenda and it is a political agenda. Everything at the United Nations IS a political agenda. Thatís what the United Nations is all about, politics, world politics. They lock you up if you go against them. Theyíve done the same thing to a LOT of professors. They canít even get their works published HERE in the West if they go against the IPCC because this whole New World Order taxation, we serve the planet idea, we serve the system and they will give us high priests to serve, believe you me, who live very well. Itís all BASED on this bogus carbon and nonsense like that.
Back to this book, on page 194 it saysÖ
Totalitarian centralization of the medical service, (A: This happened in the 1960s.) while introducing the progressive principle of free health care for all, has also made it possible to use medicine as a means of government control and political regulation. Medical dossiers in clinics and hospitals are available to government officials and a growing number of institutions and agencies asked for reports for a personís state of health, with details of his past medical history and symptoms. Psychiatrists are playing an increasingly important role in all this and they may secretly veto a young personís entry to an academic institution or a trip abroad, even only as a tourist, or pronounce his suitability or unsuitability for many categories of employment.
He goes on to say basically, that once again, doctors become agents of the government. What a story this guy has got to tell here of how they just get you for going against what the AUTHORIZED scientific opinion is and he certainly suffered. They can just lock you upÖ and claim whatever they wish to claim to keep you in prison, which is psychiatry, a psychiatric prison basically. Thatís when doctors become pawns and servants of the government and everything becomes very inefficient. So those with a brain who can reallyÖ and I mean that too, a lot of folk today have no attention span whatsoever. They are bored. They get bored with everything. If there are not enough flashing scenes in a movie, with chases and cars blowing up and every scene lasts 3 seconds maximum, they canít follow it. Theyíve been like that since they watched their first cartoons that were designed for the same purposeÖ to lower your attention span. But they cannot read. They canít read. Thatís the trade-off for having what they claim is supposedly fun.
Because of all the new system, where we are to serve the planet, remember the Royal Institute of International Affairs in its own mandates, when it was set up, its tenets set up that they would bring in a world of SERVICE. Servitude to the world state, S-E-R-V-I-T-U-D-E, SERVITUDEÖ thatís from the same term, word, as SERF, remember, because this is a new FEUDAL system. I hope people can put this together. Thatís what Professor Carroll Quigley said, who the official historian for them was. They are bringing in a world of service as the new feudal system where CEOs, corporate leaders, will be the new OVERLORDS over the general public. But the duty of the general public will be to SERVE the world state, SERVICE to the world state. Thatís what all this global warming nonsense and taxation of you into the ground, put you into little habitat areas, grading you according to your necessity to the community in communitarianism is all about. And the mainstream media wonít tell you but you can go into the main web sites, if you want to do your own searches into their own histories. They put it up for you if youíve got the head to go through it. Itís very boring stuff but Iíll tell you, you wonít have to guess about anything ever again.
Here is an article from The Times Online.
Ten important tax changes happening in April 2010
Timesbusiness.typepad.com - Money Central / April 1, 2010
Alistair Darling (A: This is the guy in charge of the taxations in Britain.) had already announced a massive £20 billion tax raid before last Wednesdayís Budget, mainly targeted at high earners. (A: This is a con; they always tell you that. Thatís what they always start the story off with, okay, the rich are going to get socked but as Elton John said back in the 70s, yeah, they always do that for us boys, but they are always write in another loop hole; we never, ever have to pay taxes for that. He was very honest about it. But they always start off their articles in that way, to put you off guard as you read the rest of the story.) Here we remind you of the key measures that will be coming into effect from April 6.
1. Showroom tax The Government announced taxes for high-polluting cars back in 2008, but these finally kicked in on April Vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after March 1, 2001 are split into 13 bands (A: Thatís for the US to copy, you see, which they are starting to copy now. They grade youÖ) (A to M) depending on CO2 emissions. The amount you will pay depends on the band your car comes under. (A: The grade.)
The most polluting newly-bought cars in band M, such as the Lexus LS 460 A8, will incur a charge of up to £950 for the first year and £435 thereafter. (A: These are punishment taxes.) New cars in band L, such as the Vauxhall Zafira 2.0i 16V Turbo 200PS M6, will incur a £750 first year rate and £425 thereafter. However, cars in bands A will pay no vehicle tax at all. (A: Now you already pay a road tax which comes under that so you will be paying. These guys give you nothing for free. They never give you anything for nothing.)
2. Fuel duty
The Chancellor had planned a 3p (A: percent) rise in fuel duty on April 1. However, this increase has now been staggered to 1p in April, 1p in October and 1p in January. (A: This is to be done in 2 increases so it will put you offÖ itís not so bad with each increase. We accept a few pennies at a time, thatís what they say at the top. Itís when they give you umpteen pounds at one time that you start getting shocked. So they stage it in 2 increases, they stagger it.)
3. Income tax bands
Tax allowances will be frozen for the tax year 2010-11, instead of rising with inflation, (A: Thatís because they are taxing all the things that you buy, your energy and everything.) while the higher rate tax threshold will be frozen at £43,875 until 2013. If it increased by the current 3 per cent rate of inflation it would rise to £44,995.
ďThis means taxpayers will pay an additional £489 in tax (A: Thatís in straight tax; thatís not on all your purchases.) and 75,000 more will pay the higher-rate tax for the first time,Ē (A: Which of course they wonít.) Mike Warburton, of Grant Thornton, (A: Grant Thornton, sounds very official, GRANT THORNTONÖ) the accountant, says. Similarly the tax-free personal allowance will stay at £6,475 instead of rising to £6,669, meaning every taxpayer will pay an extra £40. (A: [Alan laughing.] But they go on about all this stuff that nobody really bothers reading because itís hullabaloo and so on, except you are going to get stiffed. You are going to get stiffed folks. Thatís what itís going to be.† They also talk about pensions, interesting how they word this.)
Ö5. Qualifying for a state pension
The good news (A: Hereís the good newsÖ) is that men and women will need to work for only 30 years to qualify for the full basic state pension. (A: Oh, isnít that nice.) Currently, women need 39 qualifying years of national insurance contributions and men need 44 years.
The bad news is that the womenís state pension age will gradually rise from 60 to 65 between 2010 and 2020, bringing it in line with menís. [Alan laughing.] Then from 2024 both the menís and womenís state pension age will rise from 65 to reach 68 by 2046. (A: So you have to be 68Ö you might just make it before you croak and get a penny back for all that money you paid in. See, the government really needs that money now that weíre in trouble you know, and weíre fighting all the carbon dioxide and stuff, and youíve got to get something for the big boys to trade these bags of nothing between each other for trillions of dollars through the Rothschildís bank in Switzerland, and Mr Al Goreís outfit and so on. Oh, God.)
Itís just astonishing, but itís the same old stuff. Iíve seen this my whole life long, as youíre shafted and shafted and shafted and the public, the people, they still think theyíre free. Theyíre living in a police state but they think theyíre free. [Alan laughing.]
Iíve mentioned before how the big institutions that run the world, the parallel government as Quigley called them, the REAL government, who are not answerable to the public but they tell governments what to do and they even put their own men in governments and bureaucracy across the world. From the Council on Foreign Relations own web site,
Harnessing International Institutions to Address Climate Change
cfr.org / Release Date: March 2010
(A: Thatís education, everything, to go on boardÖ they call this consensus building. Meaning, if you want to be part of the system and not be defamed and get cash coming your way, youíd better go along with this. Thatís what it means. There is the music coming in, I'll be back with more on this after this break. )
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Remember, Iíll put these links up on my web site at then end of the show, with the blessings of XplorNet satellite upload, if they dare to give me a wee bit of speed to put it up there.
Iím going to put this link up too, to the Council on Foreign Relations, the parallel government, the guys whoíve got think tanks working on everything, this CHARITABLE organization that runs the world on behalf of the bankers who own them. In fact thatís what does own them; it was comprised primarily at the top of bankers from the old Milner Group, international boys of course, international bankersÖ not just local bankers but international boys. They run the world and they decide where itís going and here they are, with their ideas of how to bring ALL international institutions in together on climate change to be politically correct and go along with the one agenda; just like the Soviet Union. All science must go along with it if you want to pass your examinations and be a scientist and get paid, etc, etc. Thatís how itís done. There is a PDF of their technique from their own web site on how they are going about doing that. They cover every single area, every institution folksÖ all education, every single thing.
Interesting too is this article here, itís from Truthout.org. Itís an article about the troops in Iraq. The title isÖ
Iraq War Vet: "We Were Told to Just Shoot People, and the Officers Would Take Care of Us"
Wednesday 7 April 2010 / truthout.org / by: Dahr Jamail
On Monday, April 5, Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency: photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.
The US military confirmed the authenticity of the video.
The footage clearly shows an unprovoked slaughter, (A: Itís only one of many slaughters. Thatís what they do over there.) and is shocking to watch whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the background. (A: These soldiers talk just as if they were talking to each other sitting playing on the couch there with their little video games. Thatís how they are talking folks.)
As disturbing as the video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon. (A: It is THE common thing. You canít be a man unless you show that nothing bothers you. huh, huh, I just blew his head off, huh, huh. Thatís how they talk.)
Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces.
"I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up (A: Thatís what they call it.) with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces."
Well, there ya go and you know what the rest of it is like because thatís what soldiers are all about folks, in reality. Thatís what you go into the military to BE, a man, to be a man, you know, to look at all the nasty stuff and the gruesome stuff and you laugh at it, ha, ha, just like that and if you donít the rest of them will rib you on it and call you names. You have obedience to authority, you see. Obedience to authority, that means you are brainwashed into obeying authority and you will do WHATEVER YOU ARE TOLD. Experiments have proved this; you will do whatever you are told as long as a superior person, an officer in authority tells you to do so. They will shoulder it for youÖ and you can have no conscience about it AT ALL, just go and playÖ Johnnyís got his gun.
Anyway, From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Nearly Every one of 1.67 Million Jobs Created in
Britain Since 1997 Has Gone to a Foreigner
'Dishonest' Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK
Moodys Warns of a Test of Social Cohesion (Societal Breakdown) if US and UK Can't Successfully Implement Massive Taxation
Global Warming's Picked Apart by University of Guelph Ontario Professor
Bureaucrats Rule Over Doctors for New "Efficient" Health Care
Changes in Drug Compounds and New Guidelines on Thimerosal
Enviro-Tax Grabs UK
Council on Foreign Relations-Dept. of Global Governance-Bringing all Existing Institutions together in Consensus-Using Climate Change to Dominate Society
-PDF of Above
Troops told to Shoot People-Officers would Take Care of It
Transcribed by Diana
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"