March 29, 2010 (#543)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 29, 2010:
Owning the World by Masters of
First Confuse Sheeple into Union --
United Kingdom, United States, Soviet Union,
European Union, African Union, Pacific Rim Union,
North American Union, United Nations --
Best of All, It's Done by Stealth,
The First One was The Commonwealth:
"Planned World's Directed by Corporations,
While Public on Governments Vent Frustrations,
Countries into Blocks for Banker's Ledgers,
Amalgamations are Corporate Mergers,
A Princess's Dowry in Days of Old
Included Countries and Peasants Who Were Sold
And Marked Down by Census, Owned as Chattel,
Which Apparently Derives from Word for Cattle,
'Human Capital's' the New Term, 'More Humane',
Psycho-Linguists Attempt to Distort the Sane,
No Better Way to Alter Perception,
But to Create New Terms, Escapes Detection,
While Cultural Histories are Erased,
Entertainment Keeps Sheeple Distracted, Dazed,
When Taxed to End, Then They'll Know,
Bought and Sold, As Long Ago"
© Alan Watt March 29, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 29, 2010
(Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on March 29th 2010.
I always advise the newcomers to go into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Bookmark all the other sites you see on that front page for future use because sometimes the ‘com’ site gets bombarded with people downloading and it kind of hesitates on you when you’re downloading. This way you’ve always got the other sites to pull from if the ‘com’ site goes down which it does once in a while. You can always get the latest shows from these other sites.
Remember too there’re all whole bunch to chose from including the European site which is www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can get the addition of transcripts of alot of the talks I’ve given as well as the audios. They all have the audios but only the ‘eu’ has the transcripts and also too you can also chose from the various languages of Europe. Remember too I have books and discs for sale on my website. That’s what makes me just ‘tick over’, sometimes ‘tick over’, sometimes it’s a sort of grinding sound but it’s up to you to keep me going by purchasing the books I have for sale. Look into the website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and see what’s available and remember too, form the US to Canada, you can always purchase via personal cheque or an International Postal Money Order from your post office, Moneygram, cash – some people just send cash or you can also donate or use the donate button to purchase. Just send a separate email along with the donation as well and I’ll get them out to you. Lots of people get discs burned and passed to them and they don’t use the internet at all. Other people burn them for them the talks I give. So you can get in touch with me [listed above].
Now, there’s so much of a bombardment of news. Much of it is trivia. Some of it is kind of vaguely interesting and sometimes you’ll see patterns in the media when even trivia is released across the whole planet, the same kind of trivia, little personal stories of things going wrong with people, dealing with bureaucracies and that kind of stuff. It’s almost like an ‘imagine that’ type article. You get lots of these getting bombarded out right now from Britain, the US and Canada. ‘Who’d imagine? Who’d imagine that?’ You can’t help a child out of a tree kind of idea now without getting charged with a trespassing offence. Better let the child fall because you’re not ‘qualified’ number 1 to deal with that.
It’s the same idea as FEMA with the New Orleans idea. When people were trying to help their neighbours from drowning they were forbidden to do so by FEMA because you weren’t trained to do it. That’s the kind of world we’re all being trained into. To simply obey and to accept laws and rules which are meant to alter our behaviour and our natural responses because you see, people naturally help each other in times of trouble. That’s how we get through real disasters, not by government intervention, but by people helping people. That’s how it’s always been but not anymore apparently because we’re under this kind of governance. It takes experts to manage everything and we’re being trained everyday via the media and movies and all the entertainment industry, that ‘experts’ deal with all the big problems and your job is to allow them to do so and stand back and get out of the way – or else.
This is all Pavlovian techniques we’ve been given and the media of course is helping it along.
Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m talking about how the media present stories to us and how there are patterns in the media. This has also been verified of course by various studies in universities and all the rest of it with data collection and we see these patterns.
The media is an essential arm of government, or they call it ‘governance’ now. Everything’s changed to ‘governance’. We’re ruled by ‘experts’. That’s what it really means and the media is an essential part because we get most of what we think of as our reality, and what we should be concerned about, from the media. That’s what we think its job is. That’s what we think it is and yet, last year I think I read an article from a team who worked...who were hired by Fox News; a bunch of journalists to do documentaries. They did one and they (Fox News) didn’t allow it to be published so these journalists took Fox to court. I think it was Fox. The judge ruled in favour of Fox and said that the media doesn’t have to tell the truth to the public. There’s nothing written anywhere that says the media is there to tell you the truth.
That’s verified too by people like Zbigniew Brzezinski who talked about the media becoming almost an appendage to everyone’s brain where we expect it to do our reasoning for us, and we do. Most folk are trained that it’s some kind of altruistic thing.
At one time you see when people lived in a world of magic and they didn’t know the sciences, the sciences were always kept by the sacred few because knowledge is power. Everything was put down to an ‘act of God’ or whatever. Storms, everything was put down to this kind of thing, a bad harvest, whatever and they didn’t have the media at the time to tell them what to do. At that time priests would tell them what their answer was and that was good enough for them. What else could you do? This is the high guy here. There’s no higher guy than that, except God himself, so it must be true. Whatever you were told, it must be true. You’ve sinned or the people have sinned whatever and of course that was used for a long time.
As we became so-called ‘enlightened’, we think we’re enlightened unfortunately, we think that, the media took over. The media came out and it still is owned by private corporations. They make their money off of advertising, massive, massive advertising, incredible amounts of money they rake in for ads on television and they are under no obligation to tell you the truth and they will never print something that conflicts with their advertisers.
Big companies, big organisations, big corporations, they’re never going to print something to their own disadvantage.
There have been cases in the past where some have tried that and been put under and been put out of business because it only takes one corporation to notify the rest and say ‘you can’t trust these guys, look what they’ve done to us, they’ve given us bad press’, and everyone pulls their ads and you do down and you’re sunk.
So you can never truly have a free press on any national level at all and have it tell you the truth. Again, getting back to what it is, most folk do believe that the media’s there to tell you what’s important that you should know.
Meanwhile, half the rags they put out there today are devoted to the trash in Hollywood. You know, the divorces, the bimbos and I think they most of that stuff up to be honest with you. It’s just like soap operas ongoing and the public have been trained to be addicted to it and they are addicted to it because they’re really psychologically fascinated by the rich and famous, never understanding that anyone can be made rich and famous if the right people get behind them. That’s how the world really works.
As I say, we’re getting bombarded with trivia and in amongst the trivia there’s important stuff but even then you have to go beyond the media in this day and age to find out what’s really, really going on and I try to put links up to the big organisations, the parallel government, the real government, run by CEO’s and ‘charitable’ organisations as fronts that have international meetings and your governments all send delegates off to be involved with them and to take their so-called ‘suggestions’ and mandates to heart and write them into law, which they do. It’s been like that for an awful long time and the media, you’re lucky if the media will even mention a one-liner as to the meeting even taking place, but they’ll never explain actually what it’s all about.
It’s not their job to tell you that because it’s against their bosses’ interests to have you realise that you’ve been conned for years by the same media who should have been telling you this stuff all along. So they’re not going to start now.
Once in a blue moon you’ll see a form of almost predictive programming. You wonder at times if the exposes on television are simply predictive programming, which most of it is of course. The idea of predictive programming is an old idea. Tavistock used it and worked on this idea for the BBC many, many, many moons ago where they found that if they could implant an idea in someone’s head, either through fiction or novels that they used to read even on the radio, or plays or movies or even presented in a kind of laughing form as a kind of documentary, semi-comical, it would prepare your mind for the real thing coming down the road, because you don’t take alot of stuff seriously but you’re implanted with the idea of probability and inevitability. That’s the real key, inevitability, so that when it is introduced you think ‘well, I guess that’s normal, it’s vaguely familiar that idea’ and you don’t really rationalise and reason your way through it. You think ‘well, I guess it must be so’. You can’t remember where you got all that from so it must be so.
Now, Wendy Mesley had a show on Canadian television. She did one on the HAARP in fact, one of the first ones on HAARP technology with Nick Begich as a guest, but she also did one on a national ID card, an international ID card back in the 1990’s about 1998 I think it was, in Canada.
It started off with one of her employees, or workers, going into facilities we’d never even heard of and being ID’d by special security police for a photograph for the ID card, biometric scan, fingerprints all that stuff back in the 1990’s.
I did tape it at the time. I’ve unfortunately taped over the last part of it but I’ve got most of it, but towards the ends she talked to one of the big CEO’s of the manufacturers of the ID card.
Now it’s the same ID company or card company that’s making them for the whole of the world it seems, based in Canada here. She talked to the CEO and she said ‘people might be kind of wary of this, at all this information being available by governments, maybe even hackers. What makes you think that the public will go for this?’ and he turned round and he said, “The public will be given no option”.
You see, that’s how the world really works. The guy wasn’t giving his personal opinion. This man had been at international meetings and national meetings and it was in the works long ago and decided long ago.
The only way they have to do things now, is to gradually introduce the ideas more and more until we just cave in basically and say ‘well, it had to happen’.
But did it? Did it really have to happen when the same governments admit that nothing can be made secure as far as information goes? What’s so important about it?
Well, the owners all down through the ages, always make sure their cattle are branded you see. If you’re the owners of cattle, you’ll even find that in the Old Testament, they examine their beasts you see. Now of course they weigh them and all the rest of it and make sure that they’re healthy enough to produce for you because that’s their function, to produce for you.
We don’t realise that that’s what we are. We’re human cattle.
I was reading an article from the United Nations recently, one of their big organisations, I think it’s Unitar it’s called, which is like ‘one rat’ if you pop it around a bit. They called people human capital. We’re producers.
Remember, the UN is the organisation that’s fronting for world government and they’re like a hub that all the NGO’s, funded by the private foundations, the big rich private foundations, it’s a hub where all those groups work through. Then they work out the details for laws and changes at the United Nations and they present it to your own governments that then sign it into law. It’s just an automatic process. It’s been like that my whole life when you follow it; an automatic process.
Well getting back to the ID card, here’s an article here from www.Wired.com and it’s from March 23rd.
“Lawmakers Eyeing National ID Card” for the US.
Now we already know they put ‘Mark I’ into operation and it didn’t take off across the country as it was supposed to, but I don’t think it was really supposed to. They knew they’d get some resistance and the whole idea is to keep coming at you. It’s the same thing when they were trying to amalgamate Europe. If you voted ‘NO’ the first time they just kept coming back at you, ‘do it again, do it again and get it right this time’. That’s how it’s done.
You train animals. I hope you understand that. So it says;
“Lawmakers Eyeing National ID Card” March 23rd 2010.
“Lawmakers are proposing a national identification card — what they’re calling “high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security cards” — that would be required for all employees in the United States.”
(Alan: All employees in the entire country.)
“The proposal by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York) and Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-South Carolina) comes as the states are grappling to produce another national identification card at the behest of the Department of Homeland Security.”
(A: So they’re fronting for Homeland Security.)
“Virtually none of the states are in compliance with this Real ID program — adopted in 2005 — requiring state motor vehicle bureaus to obtain and internally scan and store personal information like Social Security cards and birth certificates for a national database.”
(A: That’s how they tried to get it through under a national vehicle license, operating license and I’ll go on with more of this when I come back after these messages.)
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m talking about the ID card ‘Mark II’ for the US and it says here;
“Homeland Security officials pointed to the Sept. 11 hijackers’ ability to get driver’s licenses in Virginia using false information as justification for the proposed $24 billion Real ID program. Schumer and Graham point to illegal immigration as cause for their plan.”
(A: So it’s illegal immigration now. For as long as I can remember the US was being flooded with illegal immigrants and every government and every change of government knew that and didn’t stop it. They can send armies across the planet and police the whole planet. People don’t realise that US troops are all over the planet. There’re bases everywhere. I remember reading one article from a military magazine. There were hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of bases across the whole world. So they can send tanks, weaponry and men and all the rest of it over but they can’t patrol their own border in the south apparently and this is the rubbish we’re supposed to accept. Most people do unfortunately. So now they’re using the immigrants as the excuse for the plan, which is going to stir up more anger against immigrants, right. They don’t care because they get everyone fighting everyone else. That’s the standard technique. Divide and conquer and then they rule them. Anyway, it says here)
““We would require all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who want jobs to obtain a high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security card. Each card’s unique biometric identifier would be stored only on the card; no government database would house everyone’s information,” they said.”
(A: I guess they spoke like twins these two. ‘They’ said this.)
“The cards would not contain any private information, medical information or tracking devices.”
(A: Well that’s what they told Canada too but then one of the articles that came out afterwards told us, from Britain actually because they’d already bought the card from Canada, that they have all the room in it for all your personal banking, all your health records and everything else and government as you know never lies to you. They don’t deceive you. You know that don’t you? Anyhow, it says)
“The card would be a high-tech version of the Social Security card that citizens already have.”
(A: That’s what they use. It’s like saying ‘we’re going to put a chip in everybody’s brain because after all some people use artificial legs and artificial arms. We’ve been using prostheses for years so what’s wrong with a chip in your brain?’ I mean that’s the sort of argument they make, isn’t it? It’s the same idea. So you’ve been using your ID card, your national security card for years so this new one with all your data can do all of your records for all departments, including your banking by the way. It’s just an extension of your social security card, that’s all it is.
We’re talked to like children. You talk down to children, don’t you? When you’re asked something really grave about something like death, you don’t really just charge into it and give them the clinical definition. You talk down to them. You come down to their level. That’s how you think; ‘I’ll come down to their level and explain it in a non-scary way.’)
“Jim Harper, director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, suggests the plan would undoubtedly lead to a national database.”
(A: Well of course it would. They’ve already got it set up.)
“He added that “there is no practical way of making a national identity document fraud-proof.””
(A: And that’s true as well. So since they all know that, why are they pushing it all across the world hmm?
“Because of the ID card’s proposed universality, it will likely be requested and required by airlines, insurance agencies, health care providers, mortgage lenders, credit card companies, and so forth,” he said.”
That ties in with the article I read last week where they talked about doing away with paper altogether, including paper cash. It’s supposed to be about 8 years and there’ll be no more paper money and it’ll be all electronic transfers and electronic business.
So that’s the US one and then voila! of course you find the same thing happening in Canada and you know, when Canada first started the fingerprinting of people on welfare quite a few years back, in preparation for trying to get the whole country fingerprinted, and then of course some of the wonder tech guys at some of the computer companies thought ‘oh we’ll make it safe for children we can use fingerprints. Everyone’s getting their fingerprints and their data collected all the time. There’re different ways to do it. They all work together I hope you realize.
“Alberta ponders biometric ID card for homeless”
Aw, it’s for the homeless. I guess it’s to let the homeless know where they are. Maybe that’s the idea right?
This is from the Calgary Herald, March 28th
In a meeting with the Herald editorial board, Housing Minister Jonathan Denis said his department is in discussions with Service Alberta about creating an Alberta ID card for the homeless. The province is working on ways to provide ID cards to homeless people that could include biometric samples of fingerprints or facial scans.
(A: Well, it means all of it. You know, and, and, and, and...)
“In a meeting with the Herald editorial board, Housing Minister Jonathan Denis said his department is in discussions...”
(A: blah, blah, blah)
"We are going to be discussing a biometric type of system,"...
(A: It’s already here, as Wendy Mesley showed in 1998 on Canadian television with all the capacity for all that stuff.)
“..."Identification does have value on the street and we have to make sure we have those adequate controls in place.
"But it would make someone feel like more of a person, help them get on their feet with a bank account -- things you can't get without identification."
(A: It’s to help the poor guys as more and more folk go unemployed because of NAFTA and GATT and, you know, the globalism. It’s to help you get a job and stuff. You might forget who you are and here they are with a big database ready to tell you.)
“Service Alberta Minister Heather Klimchuk said the card would allow homeless people to more easily obtain government ID by making it possible for a social worker to vouch for their identities in the absence of other documentation.
(A: Ohhh, it’s like they ARE talking to children! I’ll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
I’m talking about ID cards and here’s India from The Telegraph.
“India to issue all 1.2 billion citizens with biometric ID cards.”
India’s easy. You can buy off the politicians. It’s a way of life there. We think it’s corruption, they don’t see it as corruption. That’s how things work and these ID companies are passing out the cash and getting incredible sales; 1.2 billion people. Then you’ve got all your data banks and computerised equipment and specialists to hire and all that stuff to buy. That’s great business for the big corporations.
You know, the big corporations used to put all their big money into nuclear warfare missiles and stuff. That was the greatest thing because it’s like computers. You’d have a missile out for a month and then it was obsolete and the taxpayer just kept funding and funding and funding. It was great business and so many exposes came out of Britain that the House of Lords especially that get the tip-offs on what corporations are getting the deals. They’d all have shares involved in it and it’s the same thing going on today.
They all started changing into ‘security is the big thing’. After the Cold War they had to find another enemy. ‘Oh the people are the enemy.’ Everything’s a panic. Everything’s in disarray. You can’t trust anybody anywhere anytime and security would be the big, big business and it is you see; massive security.
A great business. A fantastic business and again they’re all in on it. All the big boys are in on it. They get tipped off, all the big politicians, and in they go with their investments and stuff. ‘We’re giving the contract to so and so’.
That’s how things really work. For instance, I was reading an article, just as an offside thing here, about the Rothschilds and how they’d weathered this financial crash time. They’d weathered it very well thanks to their astute business handling. They mentioned too that they’d kind of bailed out their cousins the Lehman Brothers international banking group, and now that the two groups of the Rothschild’s, the French ones and the British ones are working more closely together, because they’re managing all the European affairs for the European Parliament, all the cash and the upcoming carbon world stuff that’s going to go through their bank in Switzerland, in their private bank, they also said that they’d also managed to escape this financial storm by working with, Rio Tinto it was called. Rio Tinto is a group they own most of the shares in it and in another article it mentioned that Rio Tinto was up because its Australian branch, they’re into mining and stuff and buying mines all over the planet, rich ores and minerals and stuff, since the 1800’s. They were in trouble – Rio Tinto, in China and some of their executives were caught and imprisoned there for bribing the Chinese officials to take contracts from Australia at that time, from mines in Australia.
Everything works on this principle. We at the bottom are living in a fairyland. Honestly, we’re in a fairyland where it’s ‘do as we say, not as we do’. Really.
Getting back to the article on India though, this says, from The Telegraph, it’s from 15th July 2009. I mentioned it before but I’ll say it again. It ties in with these other articles here.
Crowds of people in Delhi, India: India to issue all 1.2 billion citizens with biometric ID cards.
“The operation will be run by the Unique Identification Authority, a new government department created specifically for the task of assigning every living Indian an exclusive number and gathering and electronically storing their personal details.”
Do you understand? India never really worked on taxation as they did in the rest of the world and now that they’re going global and the big corporations are putting in factories and businesses in there like China, then they’ve got to make sure that the slaves have got to pay up their share because that’s what slaves are for you know, and that’s nothing new to India or Britain for that matter.
When you go into the history of Britain when they went into India, what they were so impressed about was the way all the local ‘high men’, the Brahmans, in each area had their taxation set up; a system of payback really. You paid to live. You paid to exist. You paid for eating. You paid for everything. You had to give a kickback on everything to the high boys.
So they had a form of taxation and the British governors that were sent into different areas cashed in on it. They took most of their pay out of a cut of that as well; as well as getting paid by the British taxpayer for being in the military.
So this stuff is nothing new. Again, a different training for the ones above and a different training of the world view for those below and India is going to be a great boom for these characters with all the cash to come in the future once they start taxing all those people and to the government.
It’s a win/win situation for those in government now. They can start cutting out all the middle men you see; lots of them, lots of middle men.
When we go into the Security and Prosperity Partnership; and I’ll put these links up on my site remember, www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show and you can check them out for yourself, but there’s a good article from VoltaireNet which is to do with NAFTA and GATT and so on and it’s to do with The Security and Prosperity Partnership. It talks about;
“The second 2009 Censored Project selection unmasks the hard-core militarization agenda behind the secretive Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) agreement,...
(A: Which has been in the works since 2005. That’s when they signed the first. They signed the first, they’re not calling it an agreement, not like a ...I don’t know what it’s called. A club’s agreement? I don’t know, who knows, but they’re denying it’s a treaty even though we’re already working towards it. We’re already blending together. In other words, it’s legal. It’s factual reality as opposed to anything legal. Legal will come afterwards when they figure some way to make it legal. But they’ll do it all first and make it so. It says;)
“Its aim is to create a seamless North American Union under U.S. control to maximize the profits for US corporate giants...”
(A: Ha ha, who never get taxed. I just read in fact there that they’d postpone all tax for all corporations in the US and Canada for about 10 years. That’s added to the last 20 or 30 years they haven’t paid taxes. So it’s nothing to do with that. That’s just the excuse we’re getting anyway so they say they’ll tax the big boys and we’ll say ‘good, they’re going to sock it to them’.)
“...and to insure free and unlimited access to Canadian and Mexican resources, mainly oil and water, is framed by a hard core security strategy which envisions the invasion of member countries in the event of economic chaos.”
(A: And that by the way, that Security and Prosperity Partnership, was presented on Canadian television in 2005 when they were at Waco, Texas signing the agreement. The two prime ministers of Canada and Mexico and the US president and the CFR came on the same night and said that they were the ones who drafted it up and presented it to the guys to sign.
Well, did you vote in the Council on Foreign Relations? No. You’ll never hear that at election time. They have members all through government; the bosses at the top of government are all their members. Carroll Quigley said that too. It says)
“Leaders of Canada, the US, and Mexico have been meeting to secretly expand the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with “deep integration”...”
(A: That’s the same as ‘closer ties’ as they used for the European Union.)
“...of a more militarized tri-national Homeland Security force. Taking shape under the radar of the respective governments and without public knowledge or consideration, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP)—headquartered in Washington—aims to integrate the three nations into a single political, economic, and security bloc.”
(A: It’s already been happening since 2005.)
“The SPP was launched at a meeting of Presidents George W. Bush and Vicente Fox, and Prime Minister Paul Martin, in Waco, Texas, on March 31, 2005.”
(A: I taped it all on video tape and I played the audio over the air in 2005 to the US citizens because they’d never heard about it on any of their TV stations. So I played the Canadian broadcast of what they said about it from the Canadian news. That’s how you have to get the real truth through and the average American has no clue. They think that they’re the most informed people on the planet because they’ve got so many different radio and TV stations. They don’t realise that all the news is funnelled through two corporations. It says)
“The official US web page describes the SPP as “. . . a White House-led initiative among the United States and Canada and Mexico to increase security and to enhance prosperity . . .”
(A: Well, it is enhancing prosperity but it’s for those who are in the security business and sell all the gadgetry and hire armies and stuff like that.)
“The SPP is not a law, or a treaty, or even a signed agreement.”
(A: Actually it is signed because they said in one of the interviews that they’d all signed it.)
“All these would require public debate and participation of Congress.”
(A: No they don’t.)
“The SPP was born in the “war on terror” era and reflects an inordinate emphasis on US security as interpreted by the Department of Homeland Security. Its accords mandate border actions, military and police training, modernization of equipment, and adoption of new technologies, all under the logic of the US counter-terrorism campaign. Head of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff,...”
(A: At the time)
“...along with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Finance Carlos Gutierrez, are the three officials charged with attending SPP ministerial conferences.”
(A: Well they had one to sign every year up to 2010 of this non-agreement which they signed and then it’s to be total integration and we’re going through that phase right now. I’m just waiting for them to announce it on Canadian television when they sign the last one.)
But I’ll put these links up as I say and you can go through them for yourself and see what you think.
Now, most of the top members of journalism in television, radio and the news industry are members on the Council on Foreign Relations. You don’t apply to join the Council on Foreign Relations. They will invite you after scrutinising you to see if you’re a person who’ll go along with the agenda and if you like gifts and stuff like that and this article here’s from March 25th, 2010 and I’m sure these guys wrote it you see.
“How can we Americans move forward together?”
(A: It ties in with that Security and Prosperity Partnership or NAFTA. It’s all part of the same system; by Jeremy Kinsman. Interesting name, special to the CBC News.)
“In a changing world that is witnessing the end of America's global dominance, what is North America's future?
What, in fact, does North America mean, besides its obvious geographic location?
Is it really a common home for the citizens of our three countries — Canada, the U.S. and Mexico?”
(A: Do you understand where it’s going; how it’s presented? This is how they did the stuff with masses of immigration into Britain too. ‘Well what’s a citizen anyway? What’s British anyway? We’ve had the same thing in Canada for 20 years here. That’s how they get you all thinking ‘Well yeah, we came here, remember we were Vikings at one time, who knows.’ All this stuff you see?)
“How can that be, you might ask, when the largest has bulked up its border defenses to such an extent and seems to like playing footsie with economic protectionism?
North America is clearly at a strategic crossroad and the question we ought to be asking is how do we move forward together?”
(A: Isn’t it nice. You can picture us all moving like some kind of war movie at the end when the heroes are all marching into the sunset, you know, together. Do you understand the techniques that are used in everything you read?)
“Canada's Stephen Harper, Mexico's Felipe Calderon and U.S. President Barack Obama at an impromptu North American summit...”
(A: Impromptu eh?)
“...to deal with swine flu and cross-border trade in August 2009.”
(A: And they give you the links for where that was and the discussion at the North American Summit to do with cross-border trade and so on.)
“At a recent conference on North America's future at Berkeley, experts from the University of California and the University of British Columbia presented a host of material showing there are fewer differences between Canadians and Americans than are commonly believed.
As usual, the data shows Canadians are more apt to favour government services because they are seen to have worked.”
(A: Well I don’t know who said that.)
“Americans, on the other hand, have a stronger commitment to religion, especially evangelical, as part of their collective identity.
But there are no big cleavages that could block closer integration on vital issues such as the environment, energy or a common security.
So, what stands in the way of our moving forward?”
(A: The Brooders, people who brood it says here)
“The Berkeley conference was not lacking for eminent Canadian (and American) doers.
The participants included former ministers Joe Clark, Ann McLellan, Pierre-Marc Johnson, and David Emerson as well as a bi-national group of savvy scholars and former ambassadors such as Canadian Allan Gotlieb and the American Thomas Pickering.”
(A: Do you understand that Maggie Thatcher talked about a parallel government that gets the real work done. These guys are all ex-top politicians and they all know each other as Maggie Thatcher said and Carroll Quigley said the same thing about the CFR and they get things done. They’re ‘technocrats’ they call them now. They work for the ones who really run the world. They don’t get into political bickering. They’re given agendas. They will tell you that they are non-political. Every book put out by the Council on Foreign Relations, to the average person, you will think they are discussing nothing but politics, but it’s not. It’s discussing agendas; only agendas. There’s no bickering with them and that’s how they run the parallel government. They get things done and they’re not answerable to the public and they’re incredibly well financed by the big foundations.)
“For his part, Gotlieb, who championed Brian Mulroney's free-trade deal during his period in Washington in the 1980s, despaired that the combined effects of 9/11 and the U.S. financial meltdown has turned America inward and defensive.”
(A: I guess it was supposed to make us all be one big happy family. Is that why they had 9/11?)
“The recent, so-called thickening of the Canada-U.S. border, he said, has smothered the gains of the 1988 free trade agreement and its 1994 North American (NAFTA) successor.
What's more, he went on, Canada has lost strategic significance for Washington, despite the importance of our energy exports. All in all, "we don't see where we are going."
Oh really? I’ll put this link up too and you can read the pablum as they go through this kind of stuff here and then they give you all the solutions to it, of course, at the end and the different links they generally put on them as well.
You would not believe how many people have emailed me about the US losing all their rights, from US citizens, especially to do with the federal government literally running over all state laws. The constitution in the US hasn’t supposedly been changed all that much; it has been quite a bit with amendments over the years, but its basic system was set up so that the different states could, if they wanted to, secede from the whole, if promises and agreements were broken. The federal government was not supposed to interfere in certain areas to do with the states.
Everyone’s noticed that since 9/11 happened and especially now with all the left wing devotees being shoved into Obama’s regime, by the same guys who own both sides, dedicated internationalists and socialists, that really they’re trying to create a ‘Britain’ you might say, in the US. The US has to adopt the whole British system where everyone’s dependent on the government because you can’t get anything done without it and you’ve got layers of bureaucracies and so on and they’re adopting the so-called ‘healthcare’ system which is a disaster now in the UK.
The first thing the IMF does when it comes into countries is slash the healthcare budget and I’m going to go into that and show the US what you’re heading for plus the insurance companies that are backing this plan. They want it in.
Back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
Rather than read the whole article, I’m just going to mention that this is from Mail Online. It says here;
“Twenty five hospital trusts...”
(A: This is the UK. This is to show the US what you’re in for.)
“...‘should be urgently investigated over fears that thousands of patients may have died unnecessarily’” March 25th, 2010.
That ties in with another article and I’ll put all these links up remember on my site www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show.
It ties in with an article where the National Health Service for the whole of Britain is paying the Ambulance Service not to bring patients to the hospitals. I’m not kidding you, they’re paying them now. It’s to divert them off in a roundabout phone call from one place to the next and ‘stay at home, take an aspirin’. You know; ‘You what? You’ve cut your leg? Oh dear, your leg’s fallen off? Just stay at home and get someone to run to the pharmacy and get some bandages and wrap it well and see your doctor in the morning’.
I’m not kidding you folks. This is the farce that you go into with the National Health Service. That’s if you even get an appointment. That’s why folk go in an ambulance, because you can’t get appointments with anybody. That’s the real deal.
I’ve got articles here on the big, biggest insurance companies in the US are the ones who are all for this national health system in the US. It’s a beautiful, beautiful technique eh? They’re all behind it because they’re going to make an awful lot of money for less and less and less that they give out to the public.
Now there’re callers there and I’ll try and get to a couple of quick callers.
There’s Chad from Washington. Are you there Chad? Hello? Is Chad there?
Chad – Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for all your work. I’ve been listening to you for a while now and have been trying to pick up the torch as best I can.
Alan – It kind of burns the fingers right?
Chad – Yeah it does, you’re right. I was reading a bit about the National ID card or the ID card they want to push here and of course already here in Washington State they really pushed enhanced ID cards to cross over the border into Canada but I’ve been reading, this is a little off topic but not quite, I’ve been reading America’s Cultural Cold War and it’s been very revealing but I just want to assure people that most of your ideas don’t come from you because there’re alot of very agitated people that want to promote these ideas all over the place. So that’s how they come at you with all these foundations.
Alan – That’s right.
Chad – It makes alot of sense. I don’t really have a question I just wanted to call in. I’ve never called in before.
Alan – Well thanks for calling and call again.
Chad – Alright, thank you.
Alan – Bye now.
There’s also Ron from Texas. Are you there Ron?
Ron – Hey Alan. First I want to thank you for the great work you do. I’m a huge fan and have been for quite a while. I want to make a comment on your talking about the dumbed down public or the ‘sheeple’. I quit watching television a number of years ago and I noticed maybe a few days later that I actually started living a totally different reality than most of my friends and family and what I find is that they’ll believe and do anything their TV’s or their newspapers are telling them. It’s just really unbelievable the mind control the TV’s have on the American public.
Alan – It truly is. When they’re all watching TV at the same time, even in different homes, it doesn’t matter. You’re right. They’re in a different world and you’re in there with them and it really is like night and day when you get away from it and start thinking.
Ron – My discussions involve the weather or some kind of family member or something like that. I can’t even discuss politics with any, almost any of my friends now because they believe what the newspapers or the TV tells them and that’s it. It’s just unbelievable.
Alan – I’ll be talking about that tomorrow in fact and what Mr. Holdren said about the dumbed down, stupid public; no kidding you, at a world meeting. So I’ll read about that tomorrow.
Thanks for calling.
So from Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Topics of show
covered in following links:
National ID Card
Alberta Ponders Biometric ID starting with Homeless
India-1.2 Billion Biometric ID Cards to be Issued
Work for Rio helps Rothschild during crisis | The Australian
Rio Tinto Group - Wikipedia
BBC News - Rio Tinto executives handed lengthy jail terms
Preparing Minds for Complete US-Canada-Mexico Integration
NHS and Trusts Under Investigation--Thousands Die over Expected Rate
Ambulance Service Paid for Not Taking Patients to Hospital-To Meet New Government Targets