March 19, 2010 (#537)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 19, 2010:
The Informed -- Zombie Blues from Reading News:
"There's Many a Ruse Sent Out to Fool Us,
Whether For or Against, Rulers Use Us,
Do We Go Out with Whimper, Or with Bang?
'Fore We Realize Rulers Comprise One Big Gang,
And Their Money Makes the World Go Round,
We All Spend It Without Noxious Sound,
The Only Time We're in Vexation
Is When We're Forced to Pay Excess Taxation,
The Richest Folk All Band Together,
Regardless of Birthplace, Birds of a Feather,
They Own Each Country's Intelligence Service,
The Real Terrorists Who Make You Nervous,
Misleading Investigations By Way of Deception,
So Majority Will Never Get the Connection"
© Alan Watt March 19, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 19, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 19th 2010. Newcomers should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. You can download hundreds of talks Iíve given in the past for free. Bookmark all the other sites youíll see on the front page of cuttingthroughthematrix.com; these are the official sites. Once in a while the other sites go down and that way you can always have some site to choose from. The official sites are [listed above]. The alanwattsentientsentinel.eu site is the European site which is good for transcripts as well as audios. All the same audios are up there for download but the transcripts, you can choose from the various languages of Europe. There has been quite a lot done already because Iíve got some good people working on them. The cuttingthrough.jenkness.com site is very dependable that tends to stay up when the other ones go down. Remember that you are the audience that brings me to you. I donít work the way normal hosts do; generally they get their income from advertisers. What you hear on this show for advertising is paid by the advertisers directly to RBN for the air time and for their staff and equipment and bills and the transmission of the show. So itís up to you to keep me going by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com, see what I have for sale and you can buy the books Iíve written, the DVDs and the CDs that have sometimes 50 shows on them. You can also donate to me through PayPal or any means that you wish. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks of the shows burned and passed to them, they donít use computers but they can play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
I generally sift through a lot of whatís called the media today, everyday in fact, just to see what the top stories are. Thatís what they are called, STORIES. Itís somebodyís story. Most of them really are just Ďhis stories,í his or hers; it doesnít make any difference. They are spinners really. Most of them are trivia. The ones about governments and so on are generally presented in such a fashion that you are left with a particular conclusion that you were intended to reach. So as they expose things from government, they also close the doors on the truth at the same time and you donít think any further. You think youíve been told the truth. Itís amazing how most folk cannot reason for themselves now. Brzezinski was correct when he said that shortly the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves; they will only be able to repeat what they heard on yesterdayís media. Thatís happened to most people. They truly believe that the media is a sort of appendage to their survival mechanism to do their reasoning for them. What a beautiful systemÖ and it works. I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve mentioned over the years that people should read certain books and one of them is The Perestroika Deception, a good exposť of the so-called Cold War but really it was from a KGB perspective, an ex-KGB guy who defected. You realize reading it and the more you understand when you read books like this, you also know that the man is probably sincere of how he saw things but he didnít know the even higher level of intelligence which was intended to bring the Soviet Union system - the socialization, collectivist type system - in to the WestÖ by permission of those that set it up in the first place and it wasnít Russia. It was the big bankers of the West. That came out too.
A lot of that came out in the Reece Commission. Back in the 1950s, in fact, when Norman Dodd went around to the foundations - the parallel government all belonging to the Council on Foreign Relations and so on - to find out why they funded all these, what seemed to be communistic left wing movements. That came out in the official report from Congress. He was told by the heads - the CEOs of these corporations, these foundations - that their job was to change, RADICALLY change - and RADICAL is the word for it - the culture of the West SO much that they could merge the Soviet system seamlessly with the West. That ties in exactly with what Lenin talked about because the dictatorship was only supposed to last a certain time and then communism would come in and then it would go into another phase - not quite Capitalistic, not quite Communistic - to what they are now terming SOCIALISTIC, a more controlled society worldwide.
That seemed unbelievable at the time but a book was published called Foundations: Their Power and Influence, well worth reading because we are going through it all NOW. And itís only now that you are seeing a lot of this coming into play, what was predicted back then, what was desired back then by the big foundations with their multi trillions of dollars to spend on active non-governmental organizations. This article Iím going to read here falls into this and itís to do with the oil off the US coastline. It says hereÖ
Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
March 19, 2010 / THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The Obama administration is poised to ban offshore oil drilling on the outer continental shelf until 2012 or beyond. (Alan: ĎBeyondí is the word.) Meanwhile, Russia is making a bold strategic leap to begin drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico. While the United States attempts to shift gears to alternative fuels to battle the purported evils of carbon emissions, Russia will erect oil derricks off the Cuban coast.
Offshore oil production makes economic sense. It creates jobs and helps fulfill America's vast energy needs. It contributes to the gross domestic product and does not increase the trade deficit. Higher oil supply helps keep a lid on rising prices, and greater American production gives the United States more influence over the global market.
Drilling is also wildly popular with the public. A Pew Research Center poll from February showed 63 percent support for offshore drilling for oil and natural gas. Americans understand the fundamental points: The oil is there, and we need it. If we don't drill it out, we have to buy it from other countries. Last year, the U.S. government even helped Brazil underwrite offshore drilling in the Tupi oil field near Rio de Janeiro. The current price of oil makes drilling economically feasible, so why not let the private sector go ahead and get our oil?
The Obama administration, however, views energy policy through green eyeshades. (A: Itís way above Obama obviously. Everything always is. These guys are puppets.) Every aspect of its approach to energy is subordinated to radical environmental concerns. This unprecedented lack of balance is placing offshore oil resources off-limits. The O Force would prefer the country shift its energy production to alternative sources, such as nuclear, solar and wind power. In theory, there's nothing wrong with that, in the long run, assuming technology can catch up to demand. But we have not yet reached the green utopia, we won't get there anytime soon, and America needs more oil now.
Russia more sensibly views energy primarily as a strategic resource. (A: And it is; itís strategy.) Energy is critical to Russia's economy, as fuel and as a source of profit through export. (A: By the way, Russia has got massive oil fields all over Russia and all the old Soviet Bloc countries.) Russia also has used energy as a coercive diplomatic tool, shutting off natural gas piped to Eastern Europe in the middle of winter to make a point about how dependent the countries are that do business with the Russians.
As I say, this is way above Obama. They are just front men, these characters, who are TOLD what to do and they get well rewarded when they leave office for doing so. This is the takedown of the U.S. Thatís the whole point of it all, is the takedown of the US. Iíve read articles here where the top environmentalists and the big foundation leaders - some of them are on the boards now of governments across Europe and the US and Canada - have said that there can NEVER BE ANOTHER U.S.; the best thing they can do to the US industry is dismantle it completely and flatten all the suburbs and so on and so on and so on. That IS the agenda. That is the agenda. The US has fulfilled its mission. Itís conquered most of the world for the big boys; they supplied the manpower, the troops. Itís paid through its taxation for all of that and its research and development for weaponry. And they are standardizing the world, whatís left of it to standardize, into the one system. So they are pulling the rug from under the feet in the US.
Itís obvious too, that according to the dictates of those above or around Obama, most folk wonít be driving within the next 10 years or so. There will be massive penalties for driving, through carbon credits. Theyíve said at the United Nations, through Agenda 21, that eventually it will be ESSENTIAL VEHICLES ONLY. ESSENTIAL vehicles onlyÖ thatís your military, police, ambulance, bureaucratic limousines, and all the other stuff that they had in the Soviet Union. Thatís what this is all about really, is just that.
Remember, it ties in with the Reece Commission report. If you think thatís bad, letís go onto the Mail Online. This is like something out of science fiction.
British troops to march on Red Square (A: Thatís Moscow.) for first time in history... under a portrait of Stalin
By Mail Foreign Service / dailymail.co.uk / 19th March 2010
They were our uneasy allies against Adolf Hitler - and then our sworn enemies for much of the latter half of the 20th century.
But now the Cold War is over, and Britain and Russia are set to come together once again to mark their stand together against Nazi Germany - this time, in the symbolic heart of the former Soviet Union.
British troops are to march with Russian soldiers in Moscow's Red Square to mark the 65th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany, officials confirmed today.
It is believed to be the first time that British troops have ever marched in the Red Square.
However the celebration has already been mired in controversy over the city's plans to display a portrait of Soviet dictator and World War II ally Josef Stalin in the square for the parade. (A: During the war they changed their slant on Stalin and he was called Uncle Joe. He was Ďgood old Uncle Joe.í† After the Cold War started, you always need an enemy to keep the people, the peasants under your thumb and to get taxes from so they made him the big bad bear. Itís a big game, folks. Itís a game on a grand strategy and we are the ones who are supposed to be fooled by it allÖ and most folk are.)
If realised, the plans would break a major taboo in Russia.
For many, Stalin remains the butcher who sent hundreds of thousands of Communist Party men to their deaths in political purges.
He also callously condemned millions of peasants to die during man-made famines in the early Thirties. (A: That was the Ukraine and in Russia too, some parts.)
But for most modern Russians, Stalin is also the victor of World War II and the greatest hero of the Soviet century.
As the Soviet Union was brought to her knees in 1991, Stalin remained a symbol of Russian power.
Itís a sad thing tooÖ see, ordinary folk really worship power. For all that they worshipÖ see, people who worship things are always afraid of it at the same time. Itís a sadomasochistic relationship. They are terrified of someone who has such power, and they treat them like a God, like an Old Testament God in a bad mood who might just smile once in a while, throw a favor your way or have you decapitated. Thatís what they respect, unfortunately.
Thatís why we are going through the Century of Change under the guise of anti-terrorism which is really a war OF terror on the public because we obey much more easily when we are terrified. This is how the world has always been run, by psychopathic groups. These psychopathic groups that get to the top of each nation eventually intermarry each other as well; that happened all through the history of Europe for instance, and before Europe. They then are internationalists. They donít care if they preside over a country as Kings or Queens for a couple of hundred years and then hop off to another place that they own for another couple of hundred years. Itís all the same to them which peasants they are ruling over. And the public respect fear. Isnít that something? Isnít that somethingÖ
So here are troops going to march under Stalin. As I say, go back to the Reece Commission and read it folks, read the Reece Commission. In fact, the Norman Dodd report is up on YouTube somewhere; I might have the link. I had it before; I might drag it up and you can watch it again. People didnít believe him at the time, even the Congress although they accepted it as factual. We live in a double state. When we see things like this or hear things like this, we understand it on an intellectual level but we donít really want to believe it. Yet we are living through the consequences of it all, the collectivization, the new society, the Club or Romeís DREAM of a collectivist society based on the Soviet type model. Itís all coming true right now under environmentalism and conservation. Quite something indeed.
Iíve read this little article before but itís time to do it again. The Times of IndiaÖ It takes the Times of India to tell you whatís happening in the US, to show you that Agenda 21 is underway. Itís about Detroit being demolished around the outskirts right now. I'll be back with more after this break.
Iím Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, mentioning previously something that I said about the takedown of America, the US, and how it was planned that way a long time ago and how the big green boys on board the Obama train are all behind it. Then you see theyíre following out stuff they talked about maybe 10, 15, even 20 years ago, some of these greenie leaders, environmentalists, who prior to that were preaching solely, really, about cutting the population. They didnít have the idea then of blaming the weather for all our problems caused by too many people. There were just too many people, that was the basic point they used, the mantra they used to give back in the 70s.
This article is about Detroit. Detroit really was the power base for industry in the US, a big, big, massive power base. Remember, if you truly are a nation that can do anything including defend itself, you have to have a big industrial base to produce the machinery for war. What are you going to do if you go to war with some of the big boys that are producing things FOR your weaponry? Obviously they are going to stop giving you replacement parts for your weapons if you are war with them. You understand, we are already international; there are no enemies out there going to take down the US through physical war, unless itís just a matter of bringing them in to decimate the population and bring down the quota of populace to be ALLOWED to be alive. This article is from India, the Times of India.
To save itself, Detroit plans to shrink
AP, Mar 10, 2010 / indiatimes.com
DETROIT: Detroit, the very symbol of American industrial might for most of the 20th century, is drawing up a radical renewal plan that calls for turning large swaths of this now-blighted, rusted-out city back into the fields and farmland that existed before the automobile.
Operating on a scale never before attempted in this country, the city would demolish houses in some of the most desolate sections of Detroit and move residents into stronger neighborhoods. (A: Now, stronger means denser. They want you packed in like sardines, for the brave new century world weíre into now.) Roughly a quarter of the 139-square-mile city could go from urban to semi-rural.
Near downtown, fruit trees and vegetable farms would replace neighborhoods that are an eerie landscape of empty buildings and vacant lots. Suburban commuters heading into the city center might pass through what looks like the countryside to get there. Surviving neighborhoods in the auto industry's birthplace would become pockets in expanses of green.
Mayor Dave Bing, who took office last year, is expected to unveil some details in his state-of-the-city address this month. (A: I read an article months ago where Obama mentioned it because some other fella had come up with the plan for it. Then I went into what architects are being taught these days. And lo and behold, from Australia comesÖ remember, all architects are up on things at the same time across the world. In Australia they are building machines, they are talking about building massive machines to take down urban areas, HUGE things like sci-fi monsters. I realized, if thatís been taught to guys coming out of the colleges for architects then how long have they been teaching that? And itís years and years and years. They were already preparing the architects to design these things, and the engineers to design these thingsÖ 20 years ago for whatís happening now. Everything is done WAY AHEAD, long before we ever get a sniff of it. But you do get a strong smell of it for sure, a pong you might say, if you go into the writings of the Council on Foreign Relations and its members and all the green foundations that are out there too because they were talking about this 30-40 years ago.)
Mayor Dave Bing, who took office last year, is expected to unveil some details in his state-of-the-city address this month.
"Things that were unthinkable are now becoming thinkable," said James Hughes of Rutgers University, who is among the urban experts (A: You see, you have URBAN EXPERTS now.) watching the experiment with interest. "There is now a realization that past glories are never going to be recaptured. (A: Youíd better understand what heís saying there. You are never going back to being able to be self-sufficient again. Remember that word, interdependence, and all the treaties they were signing at the United Nations. That means you will be totally dependent for every thing you need coming from abroadÖ and we already almost are.) Some people probably don't accept that, but that is the reality."
The meaning of what is afoot is now settling in across the city. "People are afraid," said Deborah Younger, executive director of a group called Detroit Local Initiatives Support Corporation that is working to revitalize five areas of the city. "When you read that neighborhoods may no longer exist, that sends fear." Though the will to downsize has arrived, the way to do it is unclear and fraught with problems.
Politically explosive decisions must be made about which neighborhoods should be bulldozed and which improved. Hundreds of millions of federal dollars will be needed to buy land, raze buildings and relocate residents, since this financially desperate city does not have the means to do it on its own. It isn't known how many people in the mostly black, blue-collar city might be uprooted, but it could be thousands. (A: Many thousands Iíd say. That was in the plans a long time ago and here it comes into actuality.)
Iíve mentioned so many, many times that weíve always really been in a kind of feudal system, although Professor Carroll Quigley said the new world order they are bringing in through the Council on Foreign Relations, the parallel government, is based on a form of feudalism and a NEW form of CORPORATE overlords, CEO overlords and thatís how it will be. Weíve really been there for an awful long time. Weíve never had what we thought was democracy. Weíve had showcase elections for an awful long time, but the bankers have always ruled. Iím going to talk about the bankers when I come back from this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the big GANGS Ė or gangsters, thatís where the word comes from Ė that run the world. They have amalgamations of gangs as well that work in certain areas where they have to get along. Youíve all seen the old movies of the mafia and how they divide up a city and they have their meetings. They were all semi-enemies towards each other because they were all jealous of each otherís territory, but theyíd get together and be a big gang and hammer out the minutes of their meetings for their agendas and how they would continue to do business together. Thatís really how the world has always been.
When you go back into the old goldsmiths and how they started to give out, basically, checks. The Knights Templars were the first to do it in fact, from London. Thatís why they call it the Chancellor of the H Chequer. The Templars actually worked out the debt and profits on a massive chess board, a draft board they called it, an outdoor one with big, long sticks to move the pieces. Thatís still there today. They were really a gang. Whether they are called a priesthood or not, it doesnít make any difference; a gang is a gang. Theyíve all sworn their oaths to uphold each other and they are all that matters. They will stand up against anyone together and lie for each other and kill for each other. Thatís really what brotherhoods were always all about.
Itís the same thing all the way through nobilities as well. They have their own particular gangs and noble knighthoods, etc and awards that they give to each other. Thereís got to be an oath you take with each higher position you are given as you are let IN on the bigger secrets, which is generally the handling of the general public and how to souse them even more of their tax money. So at the bottom level whenever they say the federal government is running something, in every country, you always think well, it must be legit, theyíve got appointed people watching things like banks and so on. It never dawns on you itís just as corrupt because government itself is just another big gang that serves the bankers. They get PAID, after the bankers have got their cuts, they get paid good wages and big payoffs and so on. Thatís what itís about. All work and labor comes from the public. It doesnít matter if itís Kings or Queens living off you with armies to force you to give up your pigs, or your sheep, or your goats, or whatever youíve got there, and your corn. Or itís a government that you thinkÖ Itís even better when you think you elect them and then they up your taxes and take things from youÖ well, you know, we voted them in. Thatís how it goes isnít it? Itís a great con game.
Here is an article from the Washington Times about the bank regulators in the US who during the boom years were giving - and these are the federal employees - they were giving each other massive bonuses as well. It wasnít just the bank operatives; it was the federal overseers. It says 3 agencies paid out $19 million during the boom despite mistakes.
Bank regulators given big bonuses
washingtontimes.com /March 19, 2010 / Matt Apuzzo ASSOCIATED PRESS
Wall Street financial firms weren't the only ones giving big bonuses in the boom years before the worst financial crisis in generations. The government also was handing out millions of dollars to bank regulators, rewarding "superior" work even as an avalanche of risky mortgages helped create the meltdown.
The payments, detailed in payroll data released to the Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act, are the latest evidence of the government's false sense of security during the go-go days of the financial boom.
Just as bank executives got bonuses despite taking on dangerous amounts of risk, regulators got taxpayer-funded bonuses despite missing or ignoring signs that the system was on the verge of a meltdown.
The bonuses were part of a reward program little known outside the government. (A: There are a lot of those that go on, little known by the general public.) Some government regulators got tens of thousands of dollars in perks, boosting their salaries by almost 25 percent. Often, though, rewards amounted to just a few hundred dollars for employees who came up with good ideas. (A: I wonder what their good ideas were. Itís really how to deceive the public, their good ideas.)
During the 2003-06 boom, the three agencies that supervise most U.S. banks - the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) - gave out at least $19 million in bonuses, records show.
Nearly all that money was spent recognizing "superior" performance. (A: These guys were all in on the act that we were going to have a crash. They helped it along. And what they were doing there was rewarding themselves before the dollar became worthless. They made sure they had enough in the kitty for their own futures. Thatís what itís about.) The largest share, more than $8.4 million, went to financial examiners, those employees and managers who scrutinize internal bank documents and sound the first alarms. Analysts, auditors, economists and criminal investigators also got awards. (A: [Alan laughing.] You talk about the fox guarding the hen house. Theyíre all at it arenít they?)
After the meltdown, the government's internal investigators surveyed the wreckage of nearly 200 failed banks and repeatedly found that those regulators had not done enough.
Well they hadnít done anything did theyÖ but really, whatís new? This is, I call it tripe. This is the tripe they hand out to the public for news. Itís almost like ha, ha, ha-ha, ha, what are you going to do about it? I mean thatís really what itís like isnít it? Isnít it really? After youíve been screwed a thousand times in all ways they come out and tell you this just to rub it in your face and mock you. Thatís what they do at the top. They mock you because after all, you are down below saying oh, well. Most folk donít care. They donít care until the dollar in their pocket is worth nothing. Thatís when they care.
This article is about the same kind of thing. The Mail Online.
RBS boss walks off with a £13m pension pot (A: Thatís about $24 million.)
(so if you thought the fat cats had gone, you'd be wrong)
By Becky Barrow and Lucy Farndon / dailymail.co.uk / 9th March 2010
(A: I think 80% of that is government owned, by the way. So itís the London - I call it London; it is the government - itís the London boys who own the bank.)
A top executive at Royal Bank of Scotland will enjoy a pension worth an astonishing £582,000 a year, (A: I wonder how the poor soul will manage?) the disgraced bank revealed yesterday.
The huge payout to Gordon Pell, 60, who leaves the bank at the end of this month, is even more generous than that handed to the bank's former boss Sir Fred 'the Shred' Goodwin, which caused a national uproar last year. (A: Theyíre just going to rub it in your face.)
The gold-plated retirement - worth the equivalent of a £13.6million pension pot - will enrage taxpayers, who own 84 per cent of the bailed-out RBS. (A: I love how they say that Ďwe owní. Thatís why I say, they love socialism. Well, itís really the public who own the bank. Ha! Well, where are your dividends, eh? You donít see a penny of it. Weíre all slaves you see, under all these gangs. Perception is distorted and the public really are trained to believe the distortion. Quite something indeed.)
Iíve mentioned before about how the leaders are hand-picked and told beforehand and coached for maybe a few years before they make them Prime Ministers or Presidents. Theyíd never, ever let someone in that was the genuine article. Professor Carroll Quigley also said the same thing on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations. He says, we always make sure the top people are OUR boys, on ALL parties. Itís no different than in the Soviet system where you could vote for maybe 4 politicians but they all belonged to the Politburo, the one party system.
It says hereÖ
Blair's fight to keep his oil cash secret: Former PM's deals are revealed as his earnings since 2007 (A: This is a poor Prime Minister, a Labour guy, you know, for the working peopleÖ the Fabianist as well.) reach £20million (A: Thatís what heís earned since he left office. What they do, they pay you off, legally, through the means thatís mentioned in this article here.)
By Jason Groves / dailymail.co.uk / 19th March 2010
Tony Blair waged an extraordinary two-year battle to keep secret a lucrative deal with a multinational oil giant which has extensive interests in Iraq.
The former Prime Minister tried to keep the public in the dark over his dealings with South Korean oil firm UI Energy Corporation.
Mr Blair - who has made at least £20million since leaving Downing Street in June 2007 - also went to great efforts to keep hidden a £1million deal advising the ruling royal family in Iraq's neighbour Kuwait.
In an unprecedented move, he persuaded the committee which vets the jobs of former ministers to keep details of both deals from the public for 20 months, claiming it was commercially sensitive. The deals emerged yesterday when the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments finally lost patience with Mr Blair and decided to ignore his objections and publish the details.
News of the secret deals fuelled fresh accusations that Mr Blair is 'cashing in on his contacts' from the controversial Iraq war in what one MP called 'revolving door politics at its worst'. (A: These are his payoffs for being the little war boy for the big boys who rule Britain. Thatís how they reward you. They canít give you straight cash for taking the whole country to war and doing their bidding and making sure that the taxpayer funded it all. That would kind of stink so they call it paying, they give you payments. How about $1 million for a payment for appearing at a speech for instance, at a dinner and giving a half hour speech at the end of it? Do you think that the public paid for that, at the dinner? Of course they donít. Do you think that they give you 4 or 5 million pounds or dollars, upfront, for a book of your memoirs that no one is going to read, itís going to flop? These are PAYOFFS. Thatís how itís done. Itís always been done this way.)
They will increase concerns that Mr Blair is using his role as the West's Middle East envoy for personal gain.
The revelations also shed fresh light on his astonishing earnings, which include lucrative after-dinner speaking, consultancies with banks and foreign governments, a generous advance for his forthcoming memoirs, (A: Yawn.) as well as the pension and other perks he enjoys as a former Prime Minister.
The full extent of his income is cloaked in secrecy (A: Listen to thisÖ) because he (A: This is the guy who is supposed toÖ This is all done FOR him. Iíll read it this way. Itís been constructed FOR himÖ) has constructed a complex web of shadowy companies and partnerships which let him avoid publishing full accounts detailing all the money from his commercial ventures. (A: It will also hide all his taxable income as well. Itís done by the big boys that run the system, the guys that put him in there, the little war boy. Thatís how itís done. Thatís the real world folks. Thatís the real world.)
Youíve all been trained to believe that somehow altruistic BEINGS are up there being attentive to you like angels and you never see their FANGS. You never see their fangs. Itís all your perceptions and how theyíve been distorted, PURPOSELY, by SCIENTIFIC INDOCTRINATION and REPETITION and guys in $5,000, $10,000 suits that you think, oh, well they are winners, they are respectable people; they must have got up there because they are RESPECTABLE and decent and honest and hard working and very thrifty. You get up at the top because you are a PSYCHOPATH! Nothing stands in your way and you will do whatever your superiors tell you to do to get up there because they have no qualms about it. Well, Tony, you have to take the country to war in a few years time; what do you think of that? Okay, whatís in it for me boss? Thatís how it really works. Well, we canít pay you off while youíre Prime Minster; we have to wait till youíve left, like all the rest before you, and then weíll pay you off. Thatís how itís done. But how will I hide all this cash from the public and the tax man? Donít worry, our boys own all that stuff; we own the government; donít worry about all that; weíll set up all this stuff for you and cover your behind. Thatís how itís really done.
Perception is the biggest thing of all. There is a movie thatís just come out. Itís called Order of Chaos. Iíve got some voiceovers in it. That kind of deals with how your perceptions have been indoctrinated into you with scientific indoctrination techniques. And thatís how movies are made. Once in a while youíve got one thatís got some controversy in it and thatís what starts off the thinking process. Things that upset you at times, you need a bit of upsetting to BREAK YOUR CONDITIONING without going crazy into alien land or whatever. Everything has been covered, even where you go. As I say, waking up is like coming from a tunnel into a field. You walk upwards and then you get into the top of the tunnel and you see the field in front of you and there is a forest on the other side of a field and you want to get into that forest, it looks so beautiful. But youíve got to walk across this land mine, this field, before you get there. And the big boys make sure there is a thousand avenues that you are going to veer off into, to put you in loops, take you into outer space and back with all kinds of crazy ideas RATHER than say, here are the historical facts which are published, in the right placesÖ boring stuff. Most of you will never make it because you canít concentrate long enough to go through these boring books so youíd rather believe in the fantasy. It canít be humans, humans would never do this. READ YOUR HISTORIES OF THE WORLD. Itís been like that since probably day one. Thatís the reality of the world. Corruption can be legalized. If you own the governments you ARE the law. [Alan laughing.]
There is Lindsay from Georgia on the line. Iíll take his call now if heís there. Hello Lindsay?
Lindsay: Hello. Hey, Alan. Listen, I just wanted to tell you and all of your listeners about the Mark Glenn interview wherein Dr Alan Sabrosky, the former director of studies at the US Army War College, came out and said that the generals in the military apparatus know that Israel carried out 9/11. This is not going to go away Alan. The Arabs donít control Hollywood and Ben-Hasbin did not do 9/11. Basically, the gauntlet has been thrown down. The liars and the lies that they are telling are no long going to be accepted. When you have a man who was former Director of Studies at the US Army War College coming out and saying that Israel did itÖ Everything that is happening to our world right now is because of a bigger issue for world domination.
Alan: Yeah, I know. I know, but hold on and I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix talking to Lindsay from Georgia about Israelís involvement in 9/11 and so on. ContinueÖ
Lindsay: Okay, Alan, thank you. Iíve got the clips queued up to where he comes out with the revelation. Here it isÖ
Person 1: You have people who try to make this claim that they are loyal to America and at the same time loyal to a foreign government, it is a lie.
Person 2: It is and itís more than that, Mark. What we need to stand up and say is not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11.† They did it. I amÖ I have had long conversations over the past 2 weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the headquarters Marine Corp, and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation, period.
Alan: Okay. That will do. I donít need anymore. Iíve heard this kind of stuff before. I can remember when they caught a bunch of Israelis on an opposite tower on 9/11, at the same time, and they were all Mossad guys under the guise of student visas in the US at the time. This is old stuff and it wonít go anywhere. Honestly, it wonít go anywhere.
Lindsay: It wonít go anywhere, however, this is...
Alan: Iíve heard so many generals coming out over the years on Patriot Radio saying similar stuff and other stuff too. It really doesnít work on the general public. It wonít make a darn difference. Youíve got to understand, the US has been run by the same bunch who has run London for an awful long time. Israel is the same thing too.
Lindsay: No, no. Itís not London. Iím not saying London or the German death cult is doing this Alan. The man, the former Director of Studies at the US Army War College came out and said Israel did it and the military knows it.
Alan: But youíve got to give the proof of it; you canít just make the statement. Itís only the proof that makes any difference in anybodyís logical mind.
Lindsay: But thatís the point. The proof is already been shown from topÖ from every which way but loose, Alan.
Alan: What does it tell you? What does it tell you if your own government knows the same stuff as you do and you are talking about it right now and does nothing about it?
Lindsay: Look, I donít knowÖ
Alan: What does it tell you?
Lindsay: It tells meÖ Okay, you are asking me a question, let me give you the answer. It tells me that they are so afraid of their puppet masters and they are not sitting only in London or only in New York. They are sitting also in Tel-Aviv, also in Paris, France. They are controlÖ I admit, Alan, it doesÖ they are a formidable enemy to humanity and yes they areÖ
Alan: FDR himself said anybody who ignores the New York vote, in politics, is utterly doomed.† And itís always been that way in the US as well. As I say, youíve got money cliques, these intermarried families, 13 main families running the entire financial system of the entire planet and they are the boys who comprise the International Monetary Fund. These are the guys who set up wars, profit off them absolutely; they buy and sell countries overnight by crashing economies and all the rest of it. This is all well-known stuff; but the thing is, what are you going to do about it? And thatís the end of the show coming in.
Iíve heard this stuff ongoing for years and years and years coming out. Everybody knows that money rules the world. There is no doubt about it. Iíve mentioned it a thousand, million times. Weíre all working for it like little mice. No one has ever come out with an alternative system. You know something else? No one else would risk it. Thatís the problem with human nature.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US Bans Oil Drilling in Outer Shelf --Russia Moves in
British Troops to march in Red Square under Stalin's Portrait
Norman Dodd on Youtube-Reece Investigation into Foundations-Soviet System to Merge with West
Detroit to Shrink-Urban Areas to be Demolished and Agenda 21 Followed
Huge Bonuses for Fed. Bank Regulators during the Boom Period
Bank Head gets 13 Million Pound Pension
Blair's Earnings-20 million Pounds-How Elite Reward their War-Boy
A Few CFR Forums
Corporate Members List-CFR
Transcribed by Diana
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"