March 11, 2010 (#532)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 11, 2010:

Enviro-Fascist Apartheid -- Their New Goal, The Toilet Bowl:

"Enviro-Fascist Apartheid, Coming to Your Washroom,
Pooping and Peeing Separately Cuts Down Water Volume,
Most Poop to Be Used as Fertilizer (Don't Ask About Remainder,)
The Poop Police Will Ensure Items Go in Right Container,
The Speaker Next to Camera Will Help Achieve the Goal,
A Siren Shriek and Voice Will Speak if Peeing in Wrong Bowl,
It's a Win-Win Situation for Those Who Hand Out Fines,
Wrong Bowl in Hurry, Eyes All Blurry, Or Go Too Many Times,
Thinking of What's in the Stuff, Enough to Give You Chills,
For Thanks to 'Better Health,' Each Ones' Body Full of Pills,
To Be Spread All Over Veggies, 'The Pill,' Estrogen Too,
Men -- Get Used to Sit-n-Pee 'cause Estrogen Works on You"
© Alan Watt March 11, 2010

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 11, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


cuttingthroughthematrix.com
alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca

mirror site:
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu


Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check Ė in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 11, 2010.  For the newcomers, I always suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and scroll down the front page Ė I know itís a mess Ė and find all the official site I have up there.  Bookmark them for future use because once in a while I get problems uploading to the main .com site.  [Official site listed above.]  I always mention at the start too, that way I get the sales pitch over because most folk will repeat it all throughout and it gets monotonous, and I donít like salesmen myself.  Anyway, you are the audience that brings me to you.  I donít accept money from advertisers.  The ads on this show go directly from the advertisers, the payment, to RBN for the broadcast, their equipment, and staff and for the actual transmission of the show.  So you have to keep me going by going into my web sites and see what I have for sale.  There are books, CDs and DVDs of a lot of the talks Iíve given over the past; sometimes 50 on a disk.  They are quite cheap comparatively, for this day and age.  You can also donate to me.  [Ordering and donation options listed above.]  As I say, youíve got to keep me going.  Most folk listen, thousands listen, and few give out.  I donít use subscriptions either, which helps people pretty well know how much money they will bring in, in a month.  I donít have any of that.  I live on a shoestring and itís bit by bit as I go along.  There are also a lot of people who get disks burned and passed to them because they donít like using computers and they play them on CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. 

 

What I do on this particular program is talk about the big system in which we live, the one that we think is all quite normal.  Even when we think itís becoming abnormal, or we think weíre being taken over by some foreign entity, really, itís always been this way.  BIG GANGS RUN THE WORLD and money runs it all, so naturally the gangsters are all to do with money.  Every country revolves around cash, EVERY single country on the planet.  The last few remnants of those who didnít need money are being stamped out right now.  They call them Ďprimitiveí.  They call them Ďfixed societiesí and Ďstagnant societies.í  They are very self-sufficient but no one can be allowed to survive in this world without the big boysí DEBT system.  Debt is slavery, of course, and then you rule as the master.  I'll be back with more after this break.

 

This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.  I love talking about reality as itís presented to us and how we are conditioned to actually see it.  The old priests in ancient times knew how to get between what you saw or heard and your brain that receives it all, from your eyes or your ears.  As long as you can get IN BETWEEN them, you can alter perception and train people that whatever you tell them is normal and it becomes normal, especially after a single generation.  Then you just leave it to the parents and they will teach the same thing to their children.  So itís an ongoing process.  Itís a simple thing to do, really, if you have enough power or imagination or technique on how to do it. 

 

We are run the same way.  Schooling itself has many functions, none of which is really to give you an education to survive in life.  They might give you basic skills to get you into the system and to be taxed because thatís really what you are there for, to be taxed as a useful idiot.  Thatís what we are really.  Slavery has always been here in one form or another, as Charles Galton Darwin said himself in his book, The Next Million Years.  Itís that way.  He said at the time that he wrote his book, we are perfecting a new, more sophisticated form of slavery.  Well, thatís been done and we take everything for normal.  We think, most folk think that we vote people into office, into governments across the world.  They really do believe that, never knowing that since everything runs on money, and every Prime Minister or President has to go to their central bank every year, which is not their own; itís not their country.  Even the Federal Reserve is federal in name only.  Itís a private consortium.  Then if they must borrow money to carry on their government every year, then who runs the government?  Itís the same guys that put them in and they all work for the bankers.  If they didnít they wouldnít last very long.  Then they go off with policies that are detrimental to the general public.  So they donít ever represent the general public at all, either. 

 

Stalin wrote about the necessity to pay your soldiers, your police and your bureaucrats very well regardless if the rest of the public were starving, which they often were at times within the early Soviet Union.  It was the same in China when it went through its communist revolution and millions starved to death.  Stalin had complete faith in the bureaucracies because they made sure that THEY always had enough of everything.  Thatís something that Orwell put in his book, 1984, those bar stewards at the top lacked for nothing.  Thatís always been the way.  So even when we are going down and theyíve given your economies away, or your jobs away to China - which is really what they did when they signed the GATT Treaty - they KNEW what would happen to the US, for instance.  They knew that eventually the dollar would go as well and it wouldnít become the main trading currency of the world.  That was all discussed long before they signed the GATT Treaty.  They donít do things by accident at the top.  After all, the bigger prize is completely global; itís a WORLD enterprise.  So you can use countries along the way down through the centuries and then put it into your final one, controlling the entire planet and make money whatever you want it to be. 

 

They always take care of their own bureaucrats and employees.  The defectors from the old Soviet Union, like Bezmenov and other ones who are up on the internet giving talks, very good talks, they all said that they came over to the West NOT because they were suffering financially. They lived at the same standard of living, with the same articles and stereo systems and giant TVs as the Western bureaucrats did.  They left for ideological reasons. 

 

Here is an article from The Washington Times.  Itís one of the many that comes out over the years.  The same thing happens in every country, when Britain does it, or France, or wherever.

 

Gov't workers feel no economic pain

Washington Times / March 11, 2010 / David M. Dickson

 

The recession and the ongoing jobless recovery (Alan:  Jobless recoveryÖ I like that.) devastated much of the private-sector work force last year, sending unemployment soaring, but government workers emerged essentially unscathed, according to data released Wednesday by the Labor Department.

 

Meanwhile, the compensation for state and local government employees continued to easily outdistance the wages and benefits for workers in private business, a separate Labor Department report showed.

 

Private-industry employers spent an average of $27.42 per hour worked for total employee compensation in December, while total compensation costs for state and local government workers averaged $39.60 per hour.

 

The average government wage and salary per hour of $26.11 was 35 percent higher than the average wage and salary of $19.41 per hour in the private sector. But the percentage difference in benefits was much higher. Benefits for state and local workers averaged $13.49 per hour, nearly 70 percent higher than the $8 per hour in benefits paid by private businesses.  (A:  So thatís just going over the usual stuff as governments must take care of those that work directly underneath them; itís an essential thing for all governments to do, even when their countries are going to the dogs.)

 

Everyone has heard of Mark Baard, who has worked for the Boston Globe and other papers.  Heís got his own web site up and Iíve read from his previous site before.  This article is from the Sci-Tech Heretic, the site that heís put up. 

 

Scientists: Vaccines provide ďherd immunityĒ

By using ďherd,Ē the scientific community belies its insensitivity, if not its outright contempt, for the rest of humanity.

2010 March 10 / by Mark Baard / blast magazine.com

 

(A:  ĎHerdí, Iíve mentioned before, thatís what they say.  I first heard them use that term during the phony SARS outbreak in Toronto.  They said it was Ďherdí immunity they hoped to get into the Ďherd.í  Thatís all of us.  He goes on to sayÖ)

 

Dose the kids, protect the ďherd.Ē Thatís the language hardhearted epidemiologists are using to describe how vaccinations work to protect human populations:

 

ďAn unusual study done in 49 remote Hutterite farming colonies in western Canada has provided the surest proof yet that giving flu shots to schoolchildren protects a whole community from the disease. Although previous studies have demonstrated what scientists call Ďherd immunity,í none have been so incontrovertible, because they were done in less isolated places with more sources of flu passing through.  (A:  Itís true enough too, that they have done studies with Mormons in Utah I think it was, and others who didnít get all their different shots, etc and they found that they were the healthiest people of all with almost NO rates of autism.  Itís the same with the Amish as well.  Iím talking about the ones who REALLY follow their religion and their way of life.)

 

The scientists are, however, using the same, (A:  The name, the Ďherdí.) precise language of that obnoxious prig, the 4th Earl of Chesterfield, Philip Dormer Stanhope.  (A:  He was the one who first used it about the general public.  There is a link to his statements and for the full text there as well.)

 

He gives you links as well to where youíve seen it in the mainstream papers, The New York Times for instance, MSNBC.com.  So Iíll put this up with the other topics of tonight on my site at the end of the show. 

 

Here is another interesting one from Mark.  Itís again from Sci-TechHeretic. 

 

Nanny Stateís next stop: your bum

2010 March 11 / blastmagazine.com / by Mark Baard

 

(A:  No kidding, Ďbumí, I said it, oh, I said it.  Something thatís not said much on TV.  Well, actually it probably is on TV.  I think Iíve heard it.  I donít watch TV but I heard itís got a lot to do with bums these days, generally masculine.  Anyway, I actually titled this one; I always put different titles from the media and I said that "Itís the New Enviro-apartheidĒ and youíll understand this when I read it.)

 

And you thought recycling was a bitch: How long before theyíve got us sorting our poop and pee, Stateside?

 

Toilets that catch urine and feces, separately, are catching on with do-gooders throughout Europe, according to a recent study. Told that their waste could be sorted, (A:  Sorting your wasteÖ) and converted into fertilizer (yes for food, and yes, for human consumption), they were only too happy to oblige.

 

Men also say they are willing squat over the bowls to pee, in order to hit their marks in the so-called ďNoMixĒ toilets ó something thatís difficult to do, standing up.  (A:  Then he goes on with more of the actual story.  These toilets are being sold across Europe now.  Itís some get-rich-quick guys who got caught in on the act.)

 

More of the disgusting story:

 

ďNoMix-toilets have drawbacks, most importantly phosphate precipitation causing blockages, or the necessity to sit to urinate (practical issues reviewed in 21). Nevertheless, NoMix-toilets are increasingly installed.Ē

 

There ya go.  Thatís enviro-apartheid.  Even your poop and your pee canít go together anymoreÖ and make money off it as well.  I wonder if theyíll ask us to sort it out and deliver it to them, perhaps for free too?  Or theyíll give us special cans for it, like the garbage guys do?  But whatever way it is, we produce everything.  Marx was quite right; we are the only ones who produce, the laboring class.  Not that Iím all for Marx but thatís a truth right there.  I guess weíve got to replace something, thatís the only thing weíll be manufacturing shortly, the stuff they take away in your poop bin.

 

Schools are, ahÖ theyíre, arghÖ theyíre a disgrace!  I could go on forever about schools and the political agendas that we have of indoctrination now and what theyíve done throughout the years as they've changed more and more and more into social politics and indoctrination for the kind of society that the elite want them to live in, how they want them to behave, what type of people they want and so on.  There is a technique they use in some of these teaching groups, for the teachers too and for different peoples.  I canít remember what itís called but, for instance, if they want you to know what itís like to be blind, they will blindfold the whole class and have you stumbling across, groping each other and some people today probably enjoy that.  However, this article is about going a step further.  Itís from The Mail Online.

 

Primary schoolchildren in tears after they are told they will be removed from families as part of Holocaust 'game'

By Daily Mail Reporter / 11th March 2010

 

(A:  Boy, itís just politics going everywhere.  I'll be back with more after this break.)

 

This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article about the lengths they go to, to indoctrinate children and scare them.  Fear is a very good tacticYou tend to remember through emotion and fear is the one that really embeds itself especially when itís associated with a particular occurrence.  So they know what they are doing, of course, at the top.  This isÖ

 

A group of stunned primary schoolchildren began crying when their teacher told them during a bizarre Holocaust game that they were to be taken away from their families.

 

The pupils, aged 11, became upset after a number of them were segregated and told they were being sent away or might end up in an orphanage.

 

The ordeal was meant to give the youngsters at the Lanarkshire school an insight into the horrors faced by Jewish children during World War II.  (A:  Why not Gypsies as well?  And the Slavs and all those other people?  There were a lot of dissenters as well who were just Germans who ended up there as well, the same sort of thing.)

 

The exercise was intended to give the pupils at St Hilary's Primary School an insight into the horrors faced by Jewish children during World War II

 

But the exercise, which was sprung without warning on the children at St Hilary's Primary School in East Kilbride last Thursday morning, reduced several to tears.

 

Deputy head teacher Elizabeth McGlynn segregated nine pupils and told them they were to be sent away. After 15 minutes they were told it was all an act but that the role play would carry on up to lunchtime.

 

One angry parent, who has lodged an official complaint about the exercise, told how the 'barbaric' role play upset the children.

 

In a letter sent to council bosses, the unnamed mother said: 'Mrs McGlynn told the children they would probably have to be sent away from their families and that their parents had been informed about this and knew all about it.

 

'When one child asked if that meant they might have to go to an orphanage, they were told that might be a possibility.

 

'At that point many of the children became very distressed.  (A:  Well, no kidding.)

 

'One boy kicked his chair over, one was angry and demanded to speak to someone in charge but most were crying on a scale ranging from mildly to severely.

 

'Their ordeal lasted between 12 and 15 minutes before the children were informed that it was all an act but that the role play would continue until lunchtime.'

 

One girl said her classmates began crying when Mrs McGlynn told them she had a letter from the Scottish Executive saying nine children had to be separated from their classmates.

 

She told the shocked youngsters those who were born in January, February and March had lower IQs than other children, (A:  Thereís a nice thing to say.)  'due to lack of sunlight in their mother's womb', and that they had to put yellow hats on and be sent to the library.

 

The mother added: 'When I asked why on earth they thought it was appropriate to deliver a role play situation to the children in this way, Mrs Stewart informed me that they didn't inform the children beforehand.

 

'This was because they wanted the children to experience an "accurate emotional response" to this scenario in order for it to be reflected in their story writing.

 

'Mrs Stewart then invited me to come up to the school and see the excellent work that had been produced as a result of the exercise.

 

'I declined and my position and opinion on the method used to extract emotive story writing from the children was cruel, barbaric, traumatic and totally, totally unethical.

 

'My daughter and indeed no child needs to feel the terror, fear, panic, segregation and horror that a child of the Holocaust experienced during one of the worst atrocities in history to be able to empathise with them in order to produce good story writing.'

 

A South Lanarkshire council spokeswoman, who confirmed that a role play activity took place, said: 'The council can confirm that a parent handed in a letter to Education Resources on Monday, March 8, 2010, and this will be responded to shortly.'  (A:  Thatís your bureaucrat talking, you see.)

 

So, there ya go.  I read one quite a few months back too, where in a school the children arrived to see what they thought was their teacher lying dead in a pool of blood and the whole thing was a similar scenario as well.  This is the new teaching, all these new agers, the ones that do the strip roles as well.  I put that up a couple of weeks ago, the strippers display of the male and the female, with the lap dancing and all that.  This is the modern way because, you see, we are being degraded generation by generation.  Every 20 years or so we plummet and we see them growing up and becoming teachers and this is the kind of stuff they end up doing, with all their new agey nonsense. 

 

Again, donít forget for a minute that the governments and departments are very interested in these little experiments that they do on the children.  It will be much higher than just a school doing this, or just a couple of teachers.  I will be much, much higher than that.  Itís always the way.  We are always being experimented upon. 

 

Then as we go into the absurdity, again, of how we should live and how we should eat, and that previous article from Mark Baard, how we should pee and poop.  New York is talking about putting a bill through to ban salt in restaurants.  Remember, they banned the fatty stuff a while back there in the push for the trans fatty acids and all that kind of stuff.  Well this is the next step for it.  Eventually, youíll go in there and youíll get a leaf of lettuce, probably, and some chemical mayonnaise to stick on it, that they will tell you is good for you, when they have eliminated meat all together.  This is step by step by step of the takedown.  This article saysÖ

 

Chefs Call Proposed New York Salt Ban 'Absurd'

Wednesday, 10 Mar 2010 / By ARUN KRISTIAN DAS / MyFox New York

 

MYFOXNY.COM - Some New York City chefs and restaurant owners are taking aim at a bill introduced in the New York Legislature that, if passed, would ban the use of salt in restaurant cooking.

 

"No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises," the bill, A. 10129 , states in part.  (A:  So itís for take-out as well.  I'll be back with more after this break.)

 

This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the nanny state that the US is becoming, copying Britain of course, in many of its ways.  Theyíve actually gone a step further in banning salt, or trying to ban salt from restaurants in New York.  It saysÖ

 

The legislation, which Assemblyman Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn, introduced on March 5, would fine restaurants $1,000 for each violation.

 

"The consumer needs to make their own health choices. Just as doctors and the occasional visit to a hospital can't truly control how a person chooses to maintain their health, neither can chefs nor the occasional visit to a restaurant," said Jeff Nathan, the executive chef and co-owner of Abigael's on Broadway. "Modifying trans fats and sodium intake needs to be home based for optimal health. Regulating restaurants will not solve this health issue."  (A:  You know what youíll find is, when they cut all this stuff out, youíre rushing out to the fattiest food places you can for a decent meal because you crave it.  Your body needs a lot of that stuff.)

 

Nathan is part of the group My Food My Choice, which calls itself a coalition of chefs, restaurant owners, and consumers, called the proposed law "absurd" in a press release issued on its Facebook page.

 

Ortiz has said the salt ban would allow restaurant patrons to decide how salty they want their meals to be.

 

"In this way, consumers have more control over the amount of sodium they intake, and are given the option to exercise healthier diets and healthier lifestyles," Ortiz said, according to a Nation's Restaurant News report.

 

But many chefs and restaurant owners said they are tired of politicians dictating what they can serve and what people can eat. They have opposed the city's anti-sodium and anti-transfat campaigns.

 

"Chefs would be handcuffed in their food preparation, and many are already in open rebellion over this legislation," said Orit Sklar, of My Food My Choice. "Ortiz and fellow anti-salt zealot Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City seek to undermine the food and restaurant business in the entire state."

 

The American Heart Association (A:  aah, here we go.) encourages Americans to reduce their sodium intake and has advocated the reduction of sodium used by food manufacturers and restaurants by 50 percent over a 10-year period.

 

So, itís an ongoing process, this takedown, you see, the nanny state.  Theyíve gone further in Britain where they want to weigh you; they are weighing your children already and sending the parentsí reports if they claim you are one pound over weight and youíre a bad parent for allowing this to happen and all this.  Itís amazing too, how everybody has to be the same as everybody else.  We all have different sizes, frames, some are thin, some are wide, etc, but we are all supposed to fit into this standard bureaucratic pattern with an ideal weight for height and all that stuff.  It just doesnít work that way.  But it doesnít matter with bureaucrats; they are fanatical nutters and not very imaginative people.  They are not very bright people, really; they are told what to do and they go ahead and do it and they try to fit square pegs into round holes, stuff like that.

 

Weíve all heard about how the vaccines make people sick.  There is so much data on it, which is countered by the massive, well-financed propaganda from the big pharma companies, who do a lot of paying off of the politicians.  Donít believe for a minute that politicians donít take payoffs.  Itís a big GANG at the top and payoffs are quite normal in their routine lives.  This article is from the Mail Online.  Itís interesting.

 

Vaccines 'are making our dogs sick as vets cash in'

By Alison Smith Squire / mail online / 6th March 2010

 

Vaccines given to dogs are making them ill, a pet charity claimed yesterday.

 

Profit-hungry drug companies and vets are 'frightening' dog owners into inoculating their pets more often than necessary, according to Canine Health Concern.

 

Some puppies have developed conditions including autism and epilepsy after a raft of injections, it warns.

 

Catherine O'Driscoll, from the charity, said: 'We are not anti-vaccination. What we are saying is that currently our pets are receiving far too many.

 

'The latest scientific research shows that after the first course of injections as a puppy most dogs are immune against these diseases for at least seven years, if not for life.

 

'Every year pet vaccination companies hold National Vaccination Month, a national campaign when pet owners whose boosters have lapsed by 18 months or more are terrified into having their pet jabbed.

 

'While the vast majority of vets might simply not be aware of the latest scientific research, we are concerned that for a few undoubtedly doing multiple jabs is a way of making more money from worried pet owners.' 

 

Of course it is.  People used to go into law to bring in the big cash, but there is so much competition.  If you donít do that you go into the MEDICAL industry where itís a big rip-off and itís easy cash as well; good status and big money.  Every year someone turns 40 and gets sick basically, these days, maybe even younger, so you are guaranteed a constant flow of customers.  You donít have to MAKE a business, you donít have to make a market, itís already there; they come to you.  Now lots of them are going into veterinary science because small vets are worth a fortune.  Its $800, generally, when you walk through the door, after hours in emergency, before they do anything to the dog.  So just to walk through their doors, after hours, they then call it emergency time, itís $800 and people will spend everything they have to save Fluffy and they darn well know it too.  They make a killing off it, literally, an awful killing off it.  Big pharma is in on it too.  The same pharma companies that make vaccines and medications for the humans are the same ones that make it for the animals as well. 

 

'While the vast majority of vets might simply not be aware of the latest scientific research, we are concerned that for a few undoubtedly doing multiple jabs is a way of making more money from worried pet owners.' 

 

Puppies are vaccinated against distemper, hepatitis, parvovirus, leptospirosis and parainfluenza up to three times by the age of four months.

 

They may also be immunised against coronavirus, rabies, Lyme disease and bordetella or kennel cough. Booster shots are given every year or every three or four years.

 

But some have suffered dramatic changes in behaviour or been diagnosed with cancer within months of the injections, Canine Health Concern says.

 

In a letter backed by 17 vets and other pet experts, the charity has called on the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, which monitors animal vaccines, to issue new advice on their use.

 

Mrs O'Driscoll, who believes cats and rabbits could also be at risk, added that a simple blood test would determine whether an animal needed a booster shot.

 

Richard Allport, a Hertfordshire vet who has signed the letter to the VMD, said he was 'constantly' seeing animals that had developed 'worrying symptoms' after vaccination

 

(A:  But then of course, they have the other big, well funded animal charities who are all given cash grants by the pharma who say that the vaccinations are vital.  So you see, itís the same old stuff.  MoneyÖ money wins in the end regardless of whatís staring you in the face as evidence.  Itís just amazing.)

 

You know too, they came out with the heartworm disease.  Heartworm, heartwormÖ itís carried by mosquitoes and so on.  They certainly do have it in some places like Pennsylvania and so on.  But even up in Sudbury, when I had my previous dog, I found that there wasnít a single vet that would even see your dog unless it had all the latest vaccinations.  That was mandatory before they would look at your dog.  I just shopped around until I found someone who would treat the dog for what the dog was in for and they told me quite honestly, this young couple just starting off, they said, you donít need the heartworm shots up here because this whole area, in the North, has never seen a single case of heartworm.  Yet every other vet was telling you it was vital, because of the big bucks that they get from it.  Thatís how things really, really are. 

 

Apart from that too, you know the dog food that they make the dog food from, Iíve talked to some people who are in the manufacturing of this stuff.  They tell me itís the worst possible stuff they are adding to that reconstituted food that they give you as dog food, the pellets.  Itís grains they are using in there which are actually banned for human consumption, very cheap.  It kills a lot of dogs off.  Itís often full of pesticides.  A lot of that stuff comes from China, lots of it.  Thatís bucks for you, profits and loss and all that.  Profit for them and itís always your loss. 

 

Now, some countries in Europe have put up a big fight against the genetically modified foods but these guys will bring it in anyway, one way or another.  They never give up and after all, they can pay off all the politicians and get their way eventually. 

 

First GM potato to be grown in Europe

Farmers will be able to grow fields of genetically modified (GM) potatoes in Europe for the first time after a controversial ruling by the European Commission.

(A:  See, you can bypass countries now and go right to the Commission of the EU Parliament.  Thatís whyÖ I keep telling you, the bankers love centralization, and they own all these companies.  Itís one big gang at the top, you understand, for the whole world.  But they love centralization; then they donít have ongoing battles with separate countries and so on, to collect debt or whatever, or to pass laws.  They just get them all to amalgamate into one big consortium and they deal with the top boys there.  Itís not for our benefit, any of this.  Itís for the big boys who already own the planet.)

By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent / telegraph.co.uk / 3 Mar 2010

 

The decision is the first approval for a GM crop to be grown on a commercial scale in Europe for 12 years and was criticised by environmentalists. (A:  They are amazing, these environmentalists, what they doÖ until they get bought over too, since most of their money comes from the big boys.)

 

But the EC insisted the crop was safe and will not be grown for human consumption.  (A:  What a lie.  Theyíll probably say they are growing it for starch, for glue or something.  And Canada is one of the biggest growers of all this stuff.  Weíve got about a million acres set aside for growing potatoes and experimental stuff.  What it really is, see, not enough folk in Europe are dying with stomach cancers there yet, like they are in Canada and the States.  So they have to get that going and really up the death rate.  Then they wonít have all that pension money to pay out down the road.)

 

The GM Amflora potato has been developed by German chemical giant BASF to produce more starch. (A:  Oh, it isÖ there ya go.)  It is expected to be mostly grown in Germany for industrial purposes like the paper industry, but not food.  (A:  Of course not, of course.)

 

However it is unlikely to be grown in Britain because there is no demand for the potato in industry.

 

Prior to the potato, only MON 810, a strain of GM maize made by Monsanto, had been authorised for cultivation in Europe since 1998.

 

GM crops can also be grown for scientific trials and the UK Government has given permission for a number of GM potato trials recently.

 

However this is the first time GM has been grown on a commercial scale in Europe.

 

John Dalli, EU Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner, said its latest decision was "based on a considerable volume of sound science".  (A:  ĎSound scienceí is you put out your hand, the big boys fill it, and you stick it in your pocket.  Thatís what they call Ďsound scienceí, with the big mafia gang that runs Europe and the rest of the world.  And they always get what they want over injections.  ALWAYS.  They might wait a few years, but eventually they always get what they want.)

 

Thatís true too.  Years ago when they were trying out these potatoes on all different kinds of animals, they were all dying of massive cancers of the stomach and colon.  Of course, we are no different when it comes to that.  There is something in it that causes the problems.  Thatís why all the acid reducers suddenly blossomed on the shelves of the stores of the pharmacies and folk donít know whatís wrong with them, but the big boys certainly do.  So does your national health service, but they wonít ever admit it to you either. 

 

People forget about Iran.  Iran was on the list of the boys who were in the New American Century group.  These characters go on between and with all changes in Congress.  They donít go out of business; agendas never change.  Iran is being taken down the same way as Iraq.  Remember that Iraq had years of starvation, thanks to Madeline Albright and a few others of her cronies, as they starved the people right down into the ground.  You always do this first before you send troops in.  Weaken them, cause and get diseases going, put up the death rate, get malnourishment going, and then you hit them with the hard stuff.  So theyíre doing the same with Iran.  Theyíre cutting off their fuel supplies to Iran. 

 

Shell Halts Gasoline Sales to Iran

Company Is Latest European Energy Firm to Act as U.S. Considers Sanctions

BY GUY CHAZAN AND SPENCER SWARTZ / Wall Street Journal / MARCH 11, 2010.

 

(A:  There is also an article where, I think itís Royal Dutch Shell also, is in on it and another one, Ingersoll or whatever, is in on it as well.  They are all cutting off the supplies to Iran.  They are already cutting back medications going into Iran as well, the same as they did with Iraq.)

 

Royal Dutch Shell PLC said Wednesday, itís no longer selling gasoline to Iran, the latest oil company to make such a move during threats of tougher U.S. sanctions (A:  They call them Ďsanctionsí Öas they starve the folk.) against the Islamic Republic.

 

Shell is not currently selling gasoline to Iran, a company spokesman said.  (A:  Then it goes on to drivel after that. Drivel is nonsense.)

 

Itís ongoing.  We donít hear much about it right now but this is part of the softening-up process, as itís called. 

 

I said yesterday, the health care bill is an ESSENTIAL part of taking control over everyoneís lives, physically, a physical take over of your lives.  Thatís why youíve got to get national health services coming in.  Remember, Lenin was the one who said it, that all these things in the West will start off as services and then they would be put up, into credence, with the titles of authorities.  THATíS what they become in most countries in the world, the health AUTHORITIES says this, the health authority says that.  Theyíve got to bring in a national health care system, which is not to take care of your health; itís to bring down the health state of the entire nation, as they have done everywhere else theyíve set it up.  Once you have your whole policies dictated by POLITICAL agendas, with EUGENICAL agendas in it too, and ECONOMICS factored into it, once theyíve got it on the go they start cutting back and cutting back into bare bones.  Whenever they cut back on anything, it is always in the health sector and the National Health Service systems.  This article here is from the Washington Examiner.

 

House Democrats looking at 'Slaughter Solution' to pass Obamacare without a vote on Senate bill

By: Mark Tapscott - Editorial Page Editor / washingtonexaminer.com /  03/10/10

 

Would House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow House Democratic leaders try to cram the Senate version of Obamacare through the House without actually having a recorded vote on the bill?

 

Not only is the answer yes, they would, they have figured out a way to do it, according to National Journal's Congress Daily:

 

"House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (A:  Where would they get a name like Slaughter?) is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.

 

"Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.

 

"Slaughter has not taken the plan to Speaker Pelosi as Democrats await CBO scores on the corrections bill.  'Once the CBO gives us the score, we'll spring right on it,' she said."

 

Each bill that comes before the House for a vote on final passage must be given a rule that determines things like whether the minority would be able to offer amendments to it from the floor.

 

In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House "deems" the Senate version of Obamacare to have been passed by the House. (A:  Weíll DEEM it passed... howís that?  I'll be back with more after this break.)

 

Iím Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.  There is Maggie from Texas on the phone line.  Are you there Maggie?

 

Maggie:  I couldnít resist asking you, do you think that this proposed law to prohibit salt in restaurants is serious or is that some kind of a psyops that has been set up?  That itís not meant to be taken seriously but itís meant to be out there?  Because if they were really to do such a thing, it would not only kill the restaurant industry, it would kill the entire New York City entertainment district and since a lot of business is conducted in restaurants, it would kill a lot of business.  So do you think they are serious about this or they are just running it by us?

 

Alan:  They are running it by us but what they do is they implant, they call it, trial balloons. 

 

Maggie:  Right, a beta test.

 

Alan:  Yes.  So they put up a balloon, they see what the response is from the general public, if any, and then they will wait a week or two and then someone else will come up with a similar suggestion.  It might be along the same salt line or something else to do with the food and then float that and then see if the folk are talking about it less and less.  Once they talk about it less and less and less, itís time to push it forward, which they can certainly do if they want to.  But you must understand too, they donít want us to be healthy in this day and age.  Theyíve done all they can to make us all very unhealthy.  That would certainly fall in with their plans. 

 

Maggie:  Okay.  Thank you.

 

Alan:  Thanks for calling.

 

Maggie:  Bye.

 

Alan:  Yeah, we donít really get it.  We think we are supposed to be healthy.  Well they wouldnít put fluoride in the water if they wanted you healthy.  Stalin used that early on to dumb people down to be a compliant population.  Theyíve done many other things, with inoculations ever since, as well.  Once you start to malnourish the peopleÖ you can see very obese people, they are actually malnourished in many things which they need.  The things which they are addicted TO are often processed foods and there is no nourishment IN there, so they get on the calories, they pack that on, but they are not getting the minerals and the vitamins and the proteins and enzymes that they actually need.  This is well understood, as well.  We are not in a healthy society and people, really, are getting sicker and sicker all the time. 

 

Going along by the Malthusian documents remember, Thomas Malthus who came out with his Essay on Population and he is now revived as a hero by the Eugenics movement.  He advocated ways to kill off the useless eaters, where to build housing for them, in very unhealthy areas.  They actually worked out how far people should be bedded together, in the work houses for the poor when they were sleeping on the floor, to see how far a flea or the lice could move from one to the other to carry diseases and kill them off.  They had all this worked out to an art back in his day.  If you think that killing off the population is a new thing, they have always killed us off when there are too many of us or they simply donít need us any more.  We become the useless eaters.  Malthus also worked for the British government that had plantations across the planet.  He worked out their diets and what they did was, they put them on a vegetarian diet primarily, restricted the types of vegetables and the stuff they got, so that they could JUST continue their work, they wouldnít be too bright.  You are not bright when you are malnourished, you know.   Your mind is very sluggish.  So you are obedient, youíre easy to manage and you donít have enough energy to run away from your little slave camp at night; you donít have the energy to move or go away.  These were sciences from the 1700s and actually before, written by the same bar stewards that run the world today.  Thatís the real world we live in folks.

 

From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Government Workers feel no Economic Pain

Vaccine Herd Immunity-Dose the Children

Enviro-Apartheid comes to Toilet Bowl

School Holocaust Game leaves Children Terrified

NY Bill to ban Salt in Restaurants

Veterinary Vaccines and Side Effects

EU Dictate-First GM Pesticide-laden GMO Potatoes to be Grown in Europe

Embargo on Iran Increasing

'Slaughter Solution' to pass Obamacare without a vote on Senate bill

 

 

 

Transcribed by Diana

 


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

BOOKS

"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3

&

"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)

CDs

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)

&

Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)

DVDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"