March 9, 2010 (#530)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 9, 2010:
For Elite to Survive, Hive Takes a Dive:
"Don't Feel Despondent and Anxious or Trapped,
When Those in Oblivion See and Adapt
Into Behaviour Laid Out by Masters
Promoting 'Warming' and 'New' Natural Disasters,
Preferring Blind Ignorance to Investigation
Of the U.N. et al's Treaties or Destination,
Losing Themselves in Conspiracy Mysteries,
Where Imagination's Not Limited by Histories,
Info Entertainment is That Which They Seek,
Armchair Patriots Fascinated, Cozy and Meek,
Hoping Salvation Will Come From 'The Other,'
Forgetting, To Survive, Cain Slew His Brother"
© Alan Watt March 9, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 9, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 9th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, you should look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Scroll down and bookmark all the other sites I have listed there for future use because once in a while the big ones go down. I had two go down last night and I havenít figured out why yet. This happens once in a while so if you have the other sites bookmarked you can always download the latest shows and listen to them for free. [Official sites listed above.] Remember too, that you are the audience who bring me to you. I donít get paid directly by advertisers like most hosts do; thatís how they get their money. This way I donít have to bring people on the show as guests who will inform you of certain things but at the same time the selling technique and thatís all fair and well in this system. But Iíve got a free hand this way. The ads you hear on this show are paid directly by the advertisers directly to the station RBN for them to broadcast their air time and for their equipment, staff and their bills, and everyone has got bills. So youíve got to keep me going by buying the things I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or you can donate to me. There are the books, CDs and DVDs; some of the disks have 50 shows on them, going way back. The books are different. They are written in a non-linear fashion to try and break through the conditioning of the system which indoctrinates us from school onwards. And we do, weíre actually very predictable in the way that we think, through our logic. Just like a computer with their programs and their language, itís a science. So I try to break through that by showing you how itís done, in the book form. [Ordering and donation option listed above.] I do depend upon you to keep me going and to get through these times. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
We find that we are going through such massive changes right now. I donít know how many people really are suffering or feeling the affects of them. Even the ones who are feeling the pinch as money is devalued, and they call it inflation, they still survive, still play, they still surf the net and do whatever they do to pass the time. In other words, their routines arenít disrupted enough to make them really sit up and take notice. I wonder how many really know whatís really happening in the world. Even the things I talk about here, by showing you the big plans, the agenda and the organizations, by USING their own information to inform you, I wonder how real it is to most people out there? How REAL it is? I'll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning before the break there, that even though we go over this stuff, to a lot of people itís still pretty remote. They donít see their lives changing so drastically. What it is, is they are adapting with the incremental changes that are coming along, albeit those changes are faster than they used to be. At one time it would take maybe a few years before the next big jump in taxation or globalization or things like that so they donít really notice. For those who sometimes email me and say well, this will never happen and that could never happen, donít forget you all slept through the giving away of all the industries of your country and the whole of Western Europe to China, and adapted to that without a single problem, most of you out there, except for the people who used to work in the factories over in the West. So you can adapt, really, to anything.
Most folk still think that there is a big hierarchy up there where somehow there is an altruistic force at work where people that youíll never meet but you hear about sometimes in the newspapers are out there for your own good. They are out there to really take CARE of you and make sure that you can continue to play and do the things that you like to do. But I try to get through to the ones whoíve got more savvy and more understanding and who know that this is really REAL. They understand the implications of whatís happening. They understand that there truly are dastardly people out there who have very ominous and dark plans for the whole planet. Thatís what I try to put it out here too; itís to show you how real this is. Not to petrify you and put you into a state of immobility, but to get you to make some changes in your life so that you can at least hopefully come through the worst of it, at least in your own lifetime. What happens after we are gone, who knows.
We know where they want to take the world, the massive depopulation. We know they donít want children born, especially of the working class type people. They will keep that going in China for quite sometime maybe, because theyíve got plenty of people to choose from. As we are TAUGHT in the West to consume less and less and less, and forced to as well, by the way - force is coming along very shortly - then they will need less workers in China too. That ties in perfectly with the plan that goes up to 2050 where they actually say at world meetings that the population of China will drastically, drastically drop to 2050 and beyond. Right now itís actually dropping because there are fewer people having children and there are way more men than there are women because of their policies on abortion, etc. So thatís already leveling out. Once 2 parents produce just 1 child, you are literally halving the population in a generation. Thatís the whole idea of it.
Itís not because the world isnít big enough. Itís not that there are too many people either. Itís that those who rule the world believe in evolution and they believe that all those who are dependent, who have been MADE to be dependent I should say, upon the state, especially over the last 50-60-70 years, are really now obsolete. We are post-industrial. They also say we are post-democraticÖ so they donít even bother to give us much of an idea of democracy anymore, now that we are all, really, under a form of martial law under the guise of a war on terror. Of course, the war on terror was intended from the outset to GIVE this global alliance the right to do what they are doing right now. It also is designed to teach the public to adapt to a war type scenario, where you donít have the rights that you used to have, even the right to complain.
At least we used to bitch to each other once in a while when things were bad. Most folk donít even do that any more. I can remember when people would start complaining to each other about the price of gasoline at the pumps and stuff like that. Now it can go up 20 cents and no one says a thing, or for anything else that mattered that you buy at the stores. Everything is going up and up and upÖ so we adapt very, very well, all through sciences, all understood at the top, and the public at the bottom generally havenít a clue. The unfortunate thing about us too, is that weíve lost contact with our continuity of where we came from, where we are, and where we are going. We donít really care what happens to the next generation down the road. Thatís how selfish everyone has been taught to be.
Remember, thatís exactly what some of the big players that helped devise this system a long time ago wrote about, like Lord Bertrand Russell. He said, we shall encourage egocentric behavior, egosyntonic behavior, selfishness and hedonistic behavior. That splits up the connectiveness between people and generations and families and friends and all the rest of it. That has happened already. We even see that in the movies that they churn out because we adapt to what we see in the movies. We copy it. We mimic it in fact. There are hardly any characters in there that anybody could possibly bond with. They are all, we used to call them hard men, guys who were just the big muscle men, the hard men. Everyone is into themselves. Thatís really how itís even portrayed in movies today. The old way is out; the new way is in. We copy what we see like monkeys.
The media itself is, of course, is probably to blame, from our point of view, but on the other hand, itís only if you believe that the media is really there to inform you as to what is really going on in the world. I was thinking about it the other night, where I was thinking about all the big world meetings that have been held and how we can get access to their documents that they turn out after the meetings to do with integration, globalization, the transfer of wealth, the transfer of labor between countries, migration, all that kind of stuff, Agenda 21. You can see how it actually works and you live through it working, in fact, and even then a lot of people are oblivious to it or they donít really care as long as they can play. Thatís really what I mean, it truly is play.
People donít want the bad news. They hope to get through this life without anybody touching THEM. They hope to get to a pensionable age, retire, go fishing - if they are allowed to with a permit - and then die quietly in their sleep. Thatís what most folk truly, truly hope for. The young donít thing about that at all. They think they will live forever; we all do when weíre a certain age. Thatís what the military depends upon. So everybody and every generation in turn is actually worked upon in their kind and targeted by media and propaganda. As I say, the mediaís job is not to inform you. The media is there to give you trivia really and to give you a very VAGUE outline of the world meetings and what they are all about, they say. And yet you can still go into these world meetings from their own sites and find out what they are really about and you say, my God, are these journalists just illiterate or what or do they read this stuff? Well of course they read it but their job is NOT to get you worried about anything. Youíre not supposed to worry about anything. If you worry, you might get active and do something about it and complain and all that kind of stuff. So they give you very vague outlines about whatís really going on.
They also want to make you think that everything is just being debated in your lifetime, right now. Whereas, these big meetings are just SHOWS for the media and the public themselves. All the organization, all the drafting up of agendas, all the signing of them is done YEARS before they have the actual show meetings for all their NGO groupies. Iíve got to laugh, too, at the media and how they turn out trivia, utter trivia and diversions and nonsense, as though we had no brain at all. Perhaps, unfortunately, a lot of folk have no brain.
Remember too, that Russell and all these boys said that they would train the public that they couldnít think for themselves; theyíd HAVE to go and ask the experts how everything is done. That HAPPENED in so many areas that itís just astonishing. That folk are so stupid they ask the experts; they believe them. All you have to say is Ďexpertí now, Ďan expert saysí and you donít even need the name of the expert. It doesnít matter; itís like priesthood.
Here is a beauty right here, as though itís something brand new.
Teenage boys watching hours of internet pornography every week are treating their girlfriends like sex objects
(Alan: Well, WOW, whoíd have thunk? Who would have thunk about that? Thank goodness weíve got the media to tell us, which should be rather obvious to everybody whoís alive right now, EVERYBODY who is alive right now.)
By Penny Marshall / 8th March 2010 / Mail Online
The English verb to chaperone comes from the French noun 'chaperon' - protector - and it is first recorded in Jane Austen's novel Sense And Sensibility, published in 1811. (A: So someone is writing a little treatise here, some novice, I guess.)
Then, the reputation of a young woman was considered so precious that she was protected at all times if in male company by the presence of another woman: a chaperone.
In Jane Austen's world, a young woman and a young man were rarely, if ever, left alone together.
Two hundred years later, with sexual and feminist revolutions behind us, (A: All promoted from the top.) we're in a world where there are few, if any, boundaries in place to 'protect' a woman's honour. (A: This is how they start off this spiel here.)
Women are free to behave as they wish, sleep with whomever they wish, and the vast amounts of sexual content on TV and in films attests to that. (A: Actually, they COPY what they see on TV and they attest to what they see.)
In fact, many women would argue that the very idea of being 'chaperoned' is restrictive and demeaning.
And yet among today's teenage girls, the chaperone has made a surprising and - as we shall come to see - disturbing comeback.
Today's chaperone is called, in teenspeak, a 'third wheel'. And she is not being forced on girls by concerned or controlling adults worried about honour and etiquette.
The third wheel (the verb is 'to third wheel') has been re-invented by the girls themselves because they want protection from the sexual demands of their boyfriends. (A: The offshoot of it is, is that the boys are wanting them to do the same things that they see on the porno movies, you see; letís cut to the chase here. However, Iíve got to mention too, that this is media. Media is show business. I hope you understand that. ALL media is show business, including what you think is your news. Iíll explain about this article and how itís show business. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about how trivia is put out there for us to swallow, as though weíve no brain to think for ourselves or to use our own observations but unfortunately, a lot of folk canít actually and they do swallow up this trivia.
This article Iím reading here is about young guys who want their girlfriends to do all the same things that they see on the porno Ė whatever you call them; I donít call them Ďstarsí Ė and they want the same things going on in their sexual encounters that they see. But the woman who does it is Dr Linda Papadopoulos, one of these TV psychologists. I lump them in with the psychics and all the rest of it. In other words they make their money off show business. They probably have a big following. Theyíve got to have something that grabs you and sex always grabs people. But it doesnít take someone with half a brain to understand whatís been happening, who have lived long enough to actually live through a lot of the things and see whatís going on. Of course, everyone copies whatís in the media. Their topics are what have been on yesterdayís news, on the trivia section, or the Hollywood star section or whatever. They canít think for themselves. They are GIVEN their topics to think about, so even when they expose something, which should be obvious, there is generally another reason behind it too.
It isnít going to stop because that was one of the big tenets of the new world order boys from the 1930, 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s was destruction of the family unit, the promotion of sexual promiscuity, even starting with pre-pubertal sex. Iíve read articles from the media; itís being taught in schools now, getting younger and younger all the time. So itís WELL on track. As I say, these articles are just scratching the surface and titillating a few pervert senses. Thatís all they are really there for.
Meanwhile, as we are overwhelmed with immigrants, we find that there are quite a few articles in the papers today about the immigration in different countries. Everybody has been screaming for years about immigration and yet again, one of the main reasons for immigration, massive immigration thatís been foisted upon the free trade negotiation teams across the world for globalization, was that it would DESTROY EXISTING CULTURES OF THE WEST. That was one of the main reasons for it, in fact. The other reason they give the general public is that they need immigration because your own population is dying off, they are not producing children. They are busy getting their girlfriends to copy porno, but they are not having any children, apparently, so they need all the immigration coming in all the time in order to pay off the national debts of countries. Thatís the excuses, the official excuses we are given for it.
At the same time, remember that free trade is not free. Itís really SELECTIVE international corporations and FREE MOVEMENTS of labor that goes with the same charter for globalization. The GATT Treaty is not the free mobilization, either, of immigrants. It is SELECTIVE immigrants, those, gradually, who will be needed by international corporations ONLY. The rest of us will all be stuck within our safe and secure borders, patrolled by guys in black outfits and machine guns watching over us and we wonít be able to move from where we are. Thatís whatís coming down the pike.
Here is an article from the Globe and Mail.
As countries shut out migrants, Canada warned it will become the new safe harbour (A: for immigrants.)
As jobs disappear, host countries are lowering immigration quotas to trim welfare rolls and quell potential anti-immigrant feeling.
(A: This is on Reuters as well as in the Nation, from the Globe and Mail.)
By JOE FRIESEN / December 16, 2009 / From Wednesday's Globe and Mail
The worst recession in a generation has already played havoc with the job market, housing prices and the banking system. Now it's doing the same with something else: the worldwide movement of people.
The world's wealthiest nations, from Japan to Spain to Australia, are cutting immigration targets to protect fragile labour markets and encouraging itinerant workers to leave. Only Canada has refused to adjust immigration levels in response to the downturn. (A: I love the terminology, a downturn, itís a darn disaster for the public but itís a win, win, win for the globalists because this is what they planned a long time ago. They knew that before they signed the GATT Treaty. Well, if all the factories leave, what will happen to the workers? Let me think nowÖ letís get another panel to work on that one.)
This outlier status has led to concern among border officials that the country's sympathetic refugee system and generous social programs will make it a prime target for migrants rejected elsewhere. (A: It already has been for years.)
A government intelligence document described as sensitive and not for public distribution (A: I love how governments are there, you know, for open democraciesÖ) warns that more migrants from Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America could opt to come to Canada rather than Western Europe or the United States. The report refers to both legal applicants and those who try to enter illegally.
"We're planning for the economic recovery. (A: WhatÖ ĎWeíre planning for the economic recoveryíÖ I canít believe what Iím reading.) Cutting immigration levels is a short-term measure," said Alykhan Velshi, spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. At the same time, Mr. Velshi said, Canada must guard against those who would try to enter illegally. (A: We say a lot of things in Canada.)
Asylum claims in Canada increased dramatically in 2008, and were on pace for another increase in 2009 until visa restrictions were slapped on travellers from Mexico and the Czech Republic, he said.
"Individuals who may not be fleeing persecution are drawn to Canada because of our overly generous asylum system," (A: ĎAsylumí used to be a mental place, where you went when you were crazy. Now, apparently, itís for refugees.) Mr. Velshi said. Human trafficking rings in Canada and the Czech Republic, for example, were encouraging people to make refugee claims in Canada, he added. (A: I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just reading about immigration and how theyíre starting to talk about it for the first time. Before, nothing was apparently a problem. Suddenly itís a problem. Of course, itís all part of the big ID thing thatís coming up for everyone, thatís really whatís behind a lot of this of this stuff. This article is still about immigration but itís about Australia this time. It saysÖ
Six out of ten Australians don't want more people - poll
Australian News.Net / Monday 1st March, 2010 (ANI)
Melbourne, Mar. 1 (ANI): More than 60 percent of Australians participating in a poll have said that the federal government should not go ahead with plans to increase the country's population from 22 million to 35 million by 2050, largely through immigration.
According to AAP, a majority of the 1000 people surveyed by Essential Research late last month thought the environment was too fragile to cope with more people, and there was not enough space for them. (A: So I guess they are catching on. Theyíve got to use the Ďenvironmentí to get something through.)
The government wants to boost the population because it means more young taxpayers to pay for the high costs of an ageing population. (A: The same old rubbish theyíve been foisting on the public across Europe for about the last 20-30 years.)
The public, however, aren't buying the economic argument either. Just over half of those surveyed thought more people would not help the economy.
The poll also found that just over half the respondents - 51 per cent - approved of the government's plan to means test the rebate for private health cover. A third of respondents opposed the plan.
Everybody who set up these national health services across the world, through the British Commonwealth system, they were never set up, number one, to cope with the people they have today, the amount of people they have. They definitely are not meant to cope with the amounts of immigrants who also come straight in, often with extended families and they go straight for treatment. Not only that, when you have a government health system, you also have massive cutbacks and where do they cut back first? Itís in the health care system. Of course they always scream they never have enough money because theyíve always got other wars to go and fight and steal oil and stuff. So you could never, ever get anything back from the government; they give you a token, eventually, of health care. Thatís what, of course, theyíre going to bring to the US as well.
Where is it all going, with this sudden, sudden noticing of immigration by government? This is from the Wall Street Journal.com.
ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan
By LAURA MECKLER / MARCH 8, 2010 / Wall Street Journal
Lawmakers working to craft a new comprehensive immigration bill have settled on a way to prevent employers from hiring illegal immigrants: a national biometric identification card (A: Then it goes on to say the little bit thatís all importantÖ) all American workers would eventually be required to obtain. (A: I love that. 3 words there, snuck in there, thatís all-important.)
Under the potentially controversial plan still taking shape in the Senate, all legal U.S. workers, including citizens and immigrants, would be issued an ID card with embedded information, such as fingerprints, to tie the card to the worker.
The ID card plan is one of several steps advocates of an immigration overhaul are taking to address concerns that have defeated similar bills in the past. (A: Now, theyíve tried to get the ID card bill through under a hundred different guises, so this is the latest one.)
The uphill effort to pass a bill is being led by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), who plan to meet with President Barack Obama as soon as this week to update him on their work. An administration official said the White House had no position on the biometric card. [Alan laughing.] (A: Oh, boyÖ donít you love show business? Show business is wonderful, with these characters that rule us.)
"It's the nub of solving the immigration dilemma politically speaking," Mr. Schumer said in an interview. The card, he said, would directly answer concerns that after legislation is signed, another wave of illegal immigrants would arrive. "If you say they can't get a job when they come here, you'll stop it."
The biggest objections to the biometric cards may come from privacy advocates, who fear they would become de facto national ID cards (A: So someone is still thinking, thank goodness.) that enable the government to track citizens.
"It is fundamentally a massive invasion of people's privacy," (A: Well, whatís left to invade folks? Whatís left to invade? As I say, we adapt and we adapt to every totalitarian part of this big agenda that is rammed down our throats. Most folk sleepwalk right through it. Iíve read article after article after article about them going into all of your data on your computers, legally. It doesnít matter if itís legal or not legal; whatever they do is legal, as far as the government is concerned, their agencies. When they first gave you computers, they made sure there were backdoor entries through all the windows programs and so on. They are for that very purpose. It was not so you could just go and play. It was definitely to put you into a vague state of mind, but it wasnít for your own good. It was to make it easier for them to watch every single person, in a totalitarian society. Any change in your behavior, a sudden change in what you are viewing is of interest to those who manage you and rule you. They want you to be predictable. Everyone must be predictable, in a totalitarian society. So this goes on hereÖ) said Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "We're not only talking about fingerprinting every American, treating ordinary Americans like criminals in order to work. We're also talking about a card that would quickly spread from work to voting to travel to pretty much every aspect of American life that requires identification."
Mr. Graham says he respects those concerns (A: Yeah, right!) but disagrees. "We've all got Social Security cards," he said. "They're just easily tampered with. Make them tamper-proof. That's all I'm saying." (A: Which is all rubbish too because you know darn well that there are countries in the world that can copy any darn thing thatís madeÖ anything at all. Anything.)
U.S. employers now have the option of using an online system called E-Verify to check whether potential employees are in the U.S. legally. Many Republicans have pressed to make the system mandatory. But others, including Mr. Schumer, complain that the existing system is ineffective.
Last year, White House aides said they expected to push immigration legislation in 2010. But with health care and unemployment dominating his attention, the president has given little indication the issue is a priority.
Rather, Mr. Obama has said he wanted to see bipartisan support in Congress first. So far, Mr. Graham is the only Republican to voice interest publicly, and he wants at least one other GOP co-sponsor to launch the effort.
So here you go. As I say, they are on a roll now to mention immigration but wonít stop or slow immigration. Itís really to get everybody IDíd. Thatís the real thing about it. Eventually the ID card will be like the Soviet Union, or Nazi Germany. Youíll have to show your pass at different places, checkpoints to go anywhere outside your designated area. That is the world thatís coming down the pike. Most folk wonít mind, they will adapt to it. Theyíll have a bar there and theyíll have their little strip joints there. Most folk live in the cities now and shortly everyone will live in the cities because that is the agenda. They are already going in to demolish all the old factory towns, the suburbs, and turn them back into wilderness areas. That means that everyone else must move into the already overcrowded cities.
There is so much, so much thatís going on, as I say, that sometimes you almost despair of it all. But at the same time, this has been going on all your life. Even our behavior is modified as we go along. People donít even know that most of the things they do themselves have been authorized and promoted from the top, even their hobbies. I can remember when they brought yoga in. I can remember when the whole new age thing was being pushed, from the top down, not from the bottom up. It was promoted through music, definitely to get the young in to it. Thatís what you always do; you get the next generation, the ones that really matter, indoctrinated and going along with the new way. It doesnít matter about the old folk; they will die off. Thatís what theyíve done every 20 years or so, again, go for the youth for the next phase, the next phase, and the next phase.
The new age came in and I can remember when the Maharishi was doing his rounds all over EuropeÖ and raking in the cash. Again, promoted and getting lots of air time on TV and the BBC and all the big boys. That, obviously, is something which is a mandate. You just donít get all that promotion. If they want to ignore you, they will ignore you. Eventually there were objections because people realized he was pushing a RELIGION. It was Hinduism under the meditation and the yoga and all the rest of it. So then they came back eventually after a couple of years and introduced new scientific techniques for reducing stress and stuff like that. Now of course, I think half the worldís population goes to yoga classes and they donít realize its all part of a religion. Our behavior is constantly modified but itís by design. They had to destroy all the old religions to bring in this new one and including all the promiscuity and all the rest of the stuff that goes with it. No one bonds in a promiscuous society except for a few minutes and thatís it.
Also, youíve got to always remember too, how we are managed and manipulated. A good example is China. China never really has been a country acknowledged for its individualists. Itís not an individualistic type country. Itís a place where the GROUP, the people are the ones that matter. In fact, you can hide in the group. You can lose yourself in the group. You have no real responsibility except TO the group and the group will make sure that it will handle problems around you, for youÖ in a sense, the trade-off is you lose yourself in a group. It is the same in the military; itís all the same techniques that are used.
There is an article here about how they are now creating on the internet and being allowed to by Chinaís government, which means itís mandated by the government, A FORM OF HARASSING people who put up certain types of videos on the internet which really upsets anybody in any country. They give you an example here, to get it all going, about a woman who has got a video up and actually kills a kitten with her high heel shoe. They show you how the people are now searching for the person, they find her, she loses her job and so on. However, they are encouraging more and more of this.
Remember, Iíve talked before about the technique of SOCIAL APPROVAL and SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL that was first perfected by the guys at the United Nations and used in China. At one time they used to, for instance, have to send the militia out to grab a woman who was having a second child. That was illegal. They would drag her off to the abortion clinic. They donít have to do that now and Iíve read the articles from the Chinese papers. The local people will actually do it for you. Your neighbors will take off the woman; they will drag her to the abortion clinic, because she is ANTISOCIAL. Thatís the creation of APPROVAL and DISAPPROVAL in psychological indoctrination terminology. So this is part of it too because if they can use this technique on the public to get them to harass people on the internet, they will eventually use the same technique Ė it is the same technique actually Ė they can use it for any POLITICAL dissident as well. That will comeÖ someone who is described as antisocial, doing antisocial acts or whatever. Iíll put this link up on my site at the end of the show.
By TOM DOWNEY / March 7, 2010 / New York Times
Itís from the New York Times about human flesh search engines in China. Thatís what they are calling them, where they hunt people down on the internet, like massive posses, and really go at them. Of course, they give them something viable at first to get it all going, something that weíd all object to, but really, itís a big experiment to see if they can now use this kind of thing on the internet, to target dissident people. Thatís really what itís for. The folk who are following all this and into it, the MOB always have no brain of their own; they donít realize they are being used. The MOB never does. The mob, mind you, never, ever benefits from anything, but the mob never knows that. They are always usedÖ ALWAYS, ALWAYS USED.
Part of the big Agenda 21 agreement, many parts of it have already been implemented, thatís the Agenda for the 21st century that all countries signed on to under the United Nations. It was for not only massive depopulation but also massive deindustrialization, the returning of urban areas back to the so-called wilderness. The remaining people, as the population is reduced, going into the cities which will be gradually, again, destroyed and the outskirts will get smaller and smaller up to the year 2050 when they get their ideal population left, I suppose; thatís what theyíre all about. Part of it, too, is to start getting us trained not to have the energy that weíve got now, the energy supplies, or electricity, peopleís businesses, and all the rest of it as well. Britain of course, being the flagship for a lot of this stuff thatís going on in the world, weíve all to copy Britain. There is an article on part of it. Itís from the Telegraph.
How will David Cameron keep the lights on?
Neither of the main parties seems to have any idea how we are to meet the looming shortfall in power, warns Christopher Booker.
By Christopher Booker / 6 Mar 2010 / telegraph.co.uk
As the election approaches, two issues should transcend all others.
One, obviously, is what the parties propose to do about the £178 billion deficit in government spending. (A: Well, I wonít go there.) But another, equally terrifying Ė as this column has warned for years Ė is what is to be done to avert the fast-looming crisis in Britainís electricity supplies. With 40 per cent of our generating capacity due to disappear in the next few years, (A: 40% of their generating capacityÖ you thought it was all about carbon output and all that nonsense. No, they train you into poverty. Thatís what itís for.) as 14 of our major nuclear and coal-fired power stations are forced to close, (A: They are forcing them all to close down.) how do the parties propose to keep Britainís lights on and our computer-dependent economy functioning? (A: Thatís already happening in Canada too. They had a Pickering power plant in Ontario and they said they were not going to upgrade it or keep it going, which means we are going to get less and less power, as we get trained and trained and trained. Thatís what the Smart Meters are for too, eventually as a quota system on the Smart Meter that will cut you off when you go over your allocated quota. Who put that into being? Who was the guy who started it, kicked it off for Canada? Mr Maurice StrongÖ at the United Nations. They brought him in FROM the United Nations into Ontario. He was put at the head of the project to privatize all our systems, which we paid for by all our tax money, and of course his pals got the present for peanuts. Also it was to start brining down our consumption of energy, as they called it, to TRAIN us into austerity. That was 20 years ago.)
The energy policy of the Conservative Party appears to rest on four main pillars. The first is that electricity companies should not be allowed to replace those coal-fired power stations which help provide us with 35 per cent of our electricity unless new ones are fitted with a system to pipe off their CO2 emissions and bury them under the North Sea. (A: Can you believe this nonsense?) The Government has allocated some £4 billion for four new plants to pioneer this unproven technology (A: I love this. There will be quite the bubbles under the sea.) (to be paid for by all of us through electricity bills), but the Tories say that no new plants should be permitted unless carbon capture is already in place.
The only problem is that two recent studies have shown why carbon capture and storage on this scale is simply not physically possible. Two academic petroleum experts in Texas, Michael and Christine Economides, have shown that it is impossible to inject such huge quantities of CO2 into underground aquifers Ė 20,000 tons a day for a 1 gigawatt power station Ė without fracturing the surrounding rock, making further injection impossible. (A: Well, if you put gas into something itís going to blow it up.) This finding is confirmed in a study by the Grantham Institute at Imperial College. (A: Itís beautiful isnít it? Simple physics, but they spend millions improving it. I'll be back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Weíll go to the phones now and there is Dave from Arizona there. Are you there Dave?
Dave: How are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
Dave: You know, itís funny, the Agenda 21 thing, it kind of goes along with the housing market crash, bad economics and so forth. If you think about it, now people are going to be so burned by the experience of owning a house that they probably wonít want to own one.
Alan: Well, the agenda is eventually that all private property as we know it, with the small landlords and so forth, will all be abolished. Itís to be the big, multi chain landlords only; big corporations that will be in bed with government, these public/private partnerships and thatís whatís to rule our lives so that you can never have property again. They have said in their manifestos, the communists, and of course the United Nations a well, the same thing actually. The abolition of private property is a main tenet of their organization because it gives youÖ People fight for property; theyíll fight for the land; they will fight for their home. But when you donít own anything, there is less impetus or reason to fight for it. Youíre quite right.
Dave: Kind of like the vision that you get from reading 1984.† Itís like a small dumpy apartment. Itís like a dirty, toxic city. Itís like one screen constantly on.
Alan: Yes. And you will be watched wherever you go. Youíll see Big Brotherís face on a screen when you walk in the lobby. Youíll come up to your apartment and heíll be at the top of the stairs. Heíll be in your room. This is all part of the techniques that totalitarian regimes have always used.
Dave: One more thing, itís kind of an ode to the Western male. Itís kind of like, I think the averageÖ the first marriage/divorce rate is around 45%.
Alan: Itís probably even higher. I know that promiscuity, even in marriage... and why should they stop being promiscuous when they are married. See, it doesnít stop there. Not when theyíve been conditioned to, itís no big deal; as is often said today. Dropping your pants is no big deal; both women and men say it today. So, why should they stop when they are married? It doesnít stop now. In fact, that was also part of what Wells hoped would happen and he knew it would happen. He said, if we could encourage most of the women to go into the work force and they will spend most of their day with other males and only maybe a couple of hours at night with their own husband. So that would help to abolish marriage.
Dave: Right. Especially when you look at the role models for women.
Alan: Yes. I know.
Dave: You know theyíre all sluts.
Alan: Well, thatís it. Someone sent me some of the Grammy Awards for the best female ones. They were all dressed like prostitutes. What was interesting too, is they all had storm trooper guys dancing around them, with a SWAT team and stuff. So itís like itís very COOL now to be under martial law. Itís sexy, I guess; thatís the whole thing. And a lot of Masonic imagery too flashed in front of your face, through all the stuff, to get the youth really fascinated. Thatís what itís all for, the occult, itís to fascinate the youth. It intrigues them. Sex and violence now in totalitarianism, apparently, is very sexy and you can get awards. Itís also part of the destruction of the age groups. The communists said theyíd have to abolish the bonding and transmission of ideas between old and young and the best way to do it was to create a young generation, a youth image. Thatís what we have now. Now people are terrified to get old. They will spend fortunes to look young. Anyone who is older is obsolete. You donít get listened to; you have nothing to say to the public. Youíre out of the picture. Thatís the message weíve got today.
Dave: They miss out on the wisdom of the older people.
Alan: Absolutely. And you donít learn anything that way, when no wisdom is transmitted. Easy to manage.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Effects of Pornography on Boys--Their Relationships
Overburdened Countries shut out Migrants-Canada to be next Haven
Australian Government Wishes to Increase Immigrant Population -Poll Says Australians Opposed
Biometric ID Workers Card-Starting with Immigrants
China's Mass Manipulation-Social Approval-Disapproval Technique
Take Down of Energy for Control through Rationing
Transcribed by Diana