Feb. 9, 2010 (#510)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 9, 2010:
No Great Mystery to Planning History:
"The Big Boys Know with Informed Certitude,
People Will Come to Love Their Servitude,
There are Many Arms to the Wicker-Man,
Burning with Fire of Fanaticism to Fulfill the Plan,
Force of Law and the Purse, Rationing of Food,
Will Force Almost All to Comply and Be "Good,"
And "Good" Means Surrender, Bodies, Souls, Minds,
To Hidden Masters, Gods Over All Kinds"
© Alan Watt Feb. 9, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 9, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 9, 2010. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Look at all the other sites I have up there. [Official sites listed above.] Bookmark them for future use and try these alternate sites once in a while, often youíll get through quicker because everyone goes into the .com at the same time. There is also alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, the European site, and you can download audios from it but you can also choose from a bunch of transcripts that have been done in the various language of Europe for print up. A lot of folk are going into there and using it quite frequently. So if you want anything to read just print them up. I think itís much better reading than listening sometimes and you can take it with you wherever you go, including the washroom, the throne.
Itís up to you the listeners to keep me going. I always stress that no one is backing me here. This is probably the only program out there that isnít backed by some company or corporation. I donít sell things, except the books I write and so on, on this show. So itís up to you to back me and keep me going. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertisers Ė Iíve got nothing to do with it Ė to RBN for broadcasting the show, for the satellite and so on. That pays RBN for the time, their staff, board ops and all the bills that flood in. So you can keep me going by buy that which I have for sale on the web sites. [Order and donation options listed above.] I think the United States is the only country left where you can still use international postal money orders from your post office. It used to be across the board, across the world but theyíve stopped it everywhere else except the States; the pink, communist one is the international one for the world and that can get cashed in socialist Canada. Those that get the disks burned and passed to them and donít use computers Ė to play on CD players Ė you can get in touch with me at [address listed above]. Itís very important you get the postal code right too. Iím not kidding you, just one letter and they will hold it up at customs foreverÖ and then they send it back to you. Itís incredible, one letter. Even though the town is correct and everything else is correct, that one letter and suddenly they are like robots, they just donít know what to do. They canít look it up on a map or anything. But thatís the way it is in this computerized world, where people canít think anymore for themselves. Itís very important too, now when you donate to me Ė itís very much appreciated for those who do. Itís always the same bunch but occasionally a new person comes in, on a one time thing, and thatís really necessary because this is not a job. Itís a full timeÖ itís not even a career; itís beyond a career. There is no time to do much else except prepare and do all the shows and get things ready for the shows at night. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve talked so much in the past about the accidental view of history versus the planned view of history. Academia would love to have everyone believe Ė through all their various professors that churn out the books, the authorized history books for us Ė that everything just happens by chance here and there. Nations rise up and when somebody wants to go to war Ė and the world gets in an awful mess and we all pay for it Ė then out of that comes something from emergency meetings at the end of wars and all of that. Thatís quite interesting to see that point of view, however it canít be denied, when you go over the books that were written by big players before World War I even, that many of them talked about the necessity, especially the globalists, the ones who wanted to bring in an international socialist order.
Again too, itís so confusing. Most folk think of socialism as a systemÖ ideally itís a system where if a government is going to tax you then they plow all the money back into serving the people with services and so on. Thatís the ideal, which has never, ever been in existence and in reality. But an international socialist world order, backed by the big boys, the financial elite, who always look to the future, they were hiring think tanks back in the 1700s because they must always decide the trends. Trends donít happen by themselves. If you allow them to happen by themselves you would lose control of the entire structural system thatís already in existence. So you create the trends. You fund the organizations. You fund the associations, of very rich people, middle class people, all the way down to the lower strata. And you GUIDE them. You guide them.
In the 1800s they wanted a world society. HG Wells wrote about it. Now, all the Marxists were on board with this idea of course. It was for global revolution. There are many ways to have revolutions. There are many KINDS of revolutions. Most of them are done through social change. Then you have to create the trend to create the movement. Sometimes it can take 20-30-40 years to create a particular movement that eventually is powerful enough to make its voice heard and make its demands heard. Thatís like the green movement that started a long time ago, funded by the big foundations, again, to bring in an international socialist world order. They wanted the destruction of nations. Again, that sounds like a wonderful thing, the destruction of countries that keep battling each other and fighting and going to war. But no one asks well wait a minute, why did they always go to these wars? Who funded the wars? Who profited from wars, ongoing war? Who lent to Kings, Queens and governments? Öhuge amounts of money and at that time it was gold, solid bars of gold that was transferred back and forth by ships and carriages. You have to ask all these questions.
Getting back to what I said earlier, those who were in charge of financial situations worldwide always had to mange the trends, including using what we now call Ďfuturist think tanks,í people who take the trends of today, where is this going to go tomorrow, 50 years, 100 years, and then they control, they create the movements to control the direction of the world. That really is how itís planned. Itís no different than any kind of social planning from a local council setting up areas for building houses for the next 50 years. The expansion of the population, where do they want to put the population and where do they want to remove the populations from as well. Thatís happening right now under the greening movement, the environmental movement. They actually want to destroy and eradicate the suburbs. Iíve read the articles that Obama spoke about and the man that he brought in who came up, supposedly, with the idea of mass destruction of suburban areas that are now defunct. The factories have gone, they no longer want them around because weíve all to live in the middle cities, the big cities, the centralized cities, the super cities as the United Nations calls them, while we are managed going down this road to a world state which eradicates all the other nation-states.
The nation-states will turn into regional blocs. That was part of the plan, and thatís not the whole plan either. Remember, this is an ongoing thing. They do nickname it Ďthe never-ending story.í Man is the material. We are clay. We can be molded into any shape, form Ė meaning psychologically and eventually genetically Ė to serve the purposes of the elite. Nothing is impossible given the finances, the money and backing the scientists for research and development. Nothing is impossible. They also want to reshape the world and eradicate the systems which they used in the past, which were nation-states for war and conquest and empire building. Britain was the country they chose eventually to bring in a good part of the BEGINNINGS for a world empire. It pretty well ruled ĺ of the globeÖ and we forget about that. Once that was done they brought in the League of Nations and then the big one, the United Nations. They said at the time they would use the British Commonwealth countries, as they then re-termed it Ė you see it sounds better than an empire, commonwealth countries Ė as a nucleus of a standardized system of democracy for the rest of the world. Then they would start demolishing the nation-states by putting them into regional blocs initially and then over a period of 50 years they would take them down by splitting them up, divvying them up like a piece of cake, like a wedding cake, so they could never unite again as a big powerful country.
Yesterday I read an article concerning the sale of the Port of Dover. As that old song goes, Ďthere are blue birds over the white cliffs of Doverí. Well, Dover now belongs to a French international corporation that is buying up ports worldwide. Interesting that too, you see under the globalist agenda, which is also a combination of Marxism to bring in the collective society at the bottom run in a communistic basis with an elite feudal system above it all of corporate CEOs. You find that CEOs and companies are getting exactly what Marx suggested. There will be one company that will run all ports, one company that will run factories for shoes, one factoryÖ and so on and so on. Thatís what is to be down to it. They think itís going to be more efficient you see. Then they split it all off into these small city-state type places. The futurist reports for the next 50 years, after the riots that are to occur shortly and then end in about 50 years, will end up with certain cities that still exist today; not all of them will still be around but some of them will still exist. The high-tech cities, super cities, which will be extremely wealthy and high-tech and full of people into the sciences there, they are the ones who will come though, according to the books churned out by people like Jacques Attali who has churned out books on this very thing. There may only be 5 super cities across the whole planet; outside itís a sort of wasteland, barbaric remnants and stuff like that as they are dying off. Iím not kidding. This is from their own think tanks.
Here is an example of what they have been doing too. Itís just right on queue. I always say Iím never shocked by anything because I have read their books, and many of their older books, as I could get my hands on. This article isÖ
EU (Alan: The Economic Union, which is a parliament super-state now, remember, a new soviet.) wipes England off the map - as Gordon Brown (A: The Prime Minister.) flies the flag of St George over Downing Street (A: Itís well named Downing Street because itís going down.)
23 April 2008 / dailymail.co.uk
The Tories (A: Conservatives.) have issued a St George's Day rallying cry against plans by Brussels to "wipe England off the map" and create a United Europe.
As Gordon Brown hoisted the English national flag over 10 Downing Street to celebrate St George's Day, it was revealed that EU officials had revised a map wiping out the country and the Channel.
The change splits England into three and lumps those parts together with chunks of other countries to create "transnational regions". (A: Interesting, right on queue. Wells wrote about this in the late 1800s when he worked with the Fabian Society.)
It is claimed these zones - which have been allocated their own budgets - are intended to boost trade between EU nations. (A: They always give you a plausible truth but never the real one.)
But the Tories yesterday accused the Government of trying "to create a European superstate via the back door". (A: Well come on, itís already here; havenít they noticed?)
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG, counties along England's south coast form the "Manche Region" along with northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East has been paired up with regions across the Channel.
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western England, along with Ireland, Wales and parts of Portugal, Spain, France and Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the "North Sea Region", which covers areas of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, Norway and the Netherlands.
The UK Government is fully behind the project (A: Well, itís totally Fabian socialist. Brown is a complete Fabian. Heís a member of the Fabian Society; look into their web site; so is Tony Blair before him.), even though the words "England" and "Britain" are left off official maps of each area and the Manche Region renames the English Channel "The Channel Sea".
Each region, which will be given taxpayers' money (A: They always use the slavesí money to put them in chains.) to promote trade links, cultural ties, transport policies and tourism, is to be run by a "managing authority" (A: A private authority.) of unelected officials overseen by a director. (A: Welcome to the new system, the new feudal system.)
None will be based in the UK, with Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by the Portuguese and North Sea by the Danes.
The regions have legal status (A: As entities, like corporations. Iíll read more of this when I come back from this break. Itís amazing. Itís quite amazing, and not so at the same time.)
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and thatís the guitar wailing because weíve got lots to wail about, although most folk will go on as before. They donít see the immediate changes and they adapt into it gradually, as itís all planned to happen. Iím talking about the divvying up of the UK. People can laugh but itís going to happen in Canada and the States as well. Itís also going to happen across in the Far East too. It says hereÖ
The regions have legal status and Manche has a budget of £261million (A: They already allocated it back in 2007 and the next part is to be done in 2013.) between 2007 and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North Sea £219million. (A: To get them off the ground basically.)
Every project funded by a region must have a publicity campaign which ensures "there is provision for flying the EU flag at least one week every year". (A: See, itís again Fabian, a bit at a time and you get used to it.)
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives' communities spokesman, said: "We already knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the white flag of surrender to the European Constitution. (A: Actually it was the red flag that Mr Brown hoisted long ago, and all the people before him as well. Thatís what was happening there.)
This article is also from The Mail Online, going back to 2006.
New map of Britain that makes Kent part of France...
and it's a German idea
TIM SHIPMAN / 4 September 2006 / dailymail.co.uk
For centuries the people of Kent have called their county the Garden of England. So they might find it quite a surprise that - according to the European Union at least - they are actually part of France.
Along with next-door Sussex, Kent has been rolled in with the Calais area on a map drawn up for Brussels.
The counties now belong to the "Trans-Manche region".
Under the plans from German cartographers, the East of England has also been shoehorned into a new region, which includes Scandinavia.
The Western side of Britain has been lumped together with Ireland and the Atlantic coasts of France, Spain and Portugal.
The Tories (A: Conservatives.) accused the EU of plotting to undermine nation states and even "wipe Britain off the map".
They warned that the German government wants to make the downgrading of national borders a key plank of its presidency of the EU next year (A: That already happened.) - despite the rejection of the European Constitution by voters. (A: Which now of course is all passed, whether they liked it or not.)
Brussels bureaucrats are poised to take charge of all "spatial information" in EU nations, forcing the 25 member states to bring their maps into line with specifications laid down by Brussels. (A: All planned before anybody signed anything. They knew theyíd ram all the votes through you see. They never give up. Itís very interesting when you read the minutes and the books put out by the Royal Institute of International Affairs which basically has different branches including the Fabian Society. They run the right and the left wing and all things in between. Carroll Quigley said in his own book, as the historian of that organization, which is also called the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, that they donít mind who comes in, dictators, communists, Marxists, fascists, whatever, as long as they all go along with the agenda. And thatís what they have used, everybody.)
Those living in counties from Essex northwards will join the North Sea region under the plans, which take in coastal areas of Belgium, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway.
The new regions have been drawn up for a project called Interreg, which wants to foster cross-border co-operation (A: I love this Ďcooperationí thing. Itís like Ďcloser tiesí which means totally bound together legally.) on issues such as tourism, trade, health and the environment. (A: Now, when you go into economics they say that EVERYTHING, all laws revolve around economics; all laws, in every country. Thatís why they used trade and economics to bind the European Union together in the first place; that was the reason for it. You will have a complete amalgamation if you bind it all through economics.)
The EU project will lead to a harmonisation of geographical names, administrative units and maps.
Brussels will also be able to create a database of property information used for taxation purposes. (A: Because now THEY will be sending out the tax forms to everybody around their new soviet bloc.)
The Tories claim this could be the first step in imposing an EU-wide property tax.
Local government spokesman Eric Pickles said: "Under the Labour Government, Britain has already been subdivided into regions as part of John Prescott's empire building. (A: It wasnít his; it was planned long before he was born.)
"I fear that there is an agenda to undermine national identities (A: Ö a fear, you fear? Öitís like a slight suspicion? Boy oh boy, I tell ya, they play the game.) and impose a United States of Europe by stealth. (A: Well that has happened now.) Conservatives will fight these attempts to Balkanise Britain. (A: Meanwhile every government, left wing, right wing, thatís been in Britain, for as long as Iíve been born, and before I was born, were signing further integration treaties with the EU. They actually set up the offices in every government in Europe under agreements made at the end of World War II. But they set up the actual bureaucratic structures in 1948 and they have been signing agreements ever since for total integration. Quite amazing, but not really. Read their old books and youíll get the whole picture. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I was thinking about all the other things that are happening right now with the enviro taxes that are coming down the pike, the carbon trading, right down to YOU being billed for your carbon usage, estimated according to how much energy you use, electricity and so on. Eventually you are going to see rationing on gasoline and various other things as they all get you into your little regions where you can move around in but you will be unable to use private transportation, according to the United Nations Agenda 21. All this stuff is out there for those that want to look at it; most folk donít want to.
Most folk donít really want to look at this. Even people who are going crazy with the internetÖ and some people are going crazy. I get crazy emails all the time. Iíll give you an example. Yesterday I read about the weather warfare treaty and I didnít use the UN site and some guy emailed me up and says, I couldnít find it anywhere. Meanwhile Iíve downloaded everything from the UN site on weather warfare, because they update the treaty every year, or every couple of years. The guy said he couldnít find it. Well I canít be his nanny you see, and heís probably too busy looking in a hundred different directions for other things at the same time and he canít concentrate on one thing. So there is a downside to information overload as well.
TaxesÖ everywhere. There is also a Tobin Tax. You have heard the name floated once in a while, for those that still have memory. And people really are losing their memories. They have just forgotten that we had the flu scare there and we had billions of dollars thrown at it and it didnít exist and now it just faded away. But itís officially, by the way, been announced that itís over. I hope you understand that now. You can breathe a sigh of relief that itís over; the nonevent is over. And before that you just got suckered by the banks that collapsed, supposedly, with trillions of bucks as well, but thatís all forgotten now as well.
The Tobin Tax has been floated many times. Itís a WORLD TAX. This article is about that.
"Tobin Tax" and UN Global Taxman Making A Comeback
Written by William F. Jasper / Monday, 8 February 2010 / thenewamerican.com
For decades, the "Tobin Tax" ó a proposed global tax on currency transactions ó has remained far from economic mainstream thought, being primarily the hobby horse of left-wing academics and advocates of world government, such as the World Federalists, or communist dictators, such as Fidel Castro. The past few years, however, have seen a host of Tobin-type proposals coming from more establishment sources.
In the past few months, it has been boosted by liberal-left economists Paul Krugman and Robert Kuttner, as well as French President Nicolas Sarkozy, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, the European Council, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou (who is also president of the Socialist International) and the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority chairman Lord Adair Turner.
Advocates of the Tobin tax, named for the late Yale economics professor and Nobel laureate James Tobin, suggest a tax on foreign currency transactions would engender international currency stability by discouraging speculation. (A: What it actually does too is pass the cost of every transaction of the goods which are imported and then sold to you, all the way down to YOU, because obviously the big boys have to pass it down. They donít want to pay it. They are going to pass it on down to the guy at the bottom. It means all of YOU, because everything now is imported.) Some politicians, like Gordon Brown and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, have pushed for Tobin taxes at the national level. However, as the British journal The Economist noted, ďUnless a Tobin tax were implemented worldwide, trading would move out of any country that enforced it."
Tobin proponents differ greatly on the optimum rate that should be charged, which is to be expected, since the line between speculating and investing is largely subjective. Some Tobin tax advocates propose "simplifying" things by levying a tax not only on foreign currency conversions, but all securities transactions. With tens of trillions of dollars in transactions taking place, that raises the possibility of raising hundreds of billions of dollars annually in new tax revenues. Voila! Suddenly the Tobin tax is transformed from a "stabilizing" tool into an almost inexhaustible global source of revenue. (A: Remember the whole deal too is to get the UN up to its proper status because thatís what itís supposed to be. Itís never been the negotiating table, believe you me. Itís been a system set up for advocating ALL the global policies to bring them into a world government. That was its function, but it needs the cash to do so. And itís going to get a lot already through all of these carbon taxes, by the way, once Lord Rothschildís bank has had his hands on it for a while, gathering interest, in Switzerland, then it gets passed on to the United Nations. So this is another one thatís going to be tacked on to the UN as well.)
Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, addressing the UN's World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, in Durban, South Africa, in September, 2001, proposed a Tobin tax that would provide the UN with a trillion dollars annually. Fidel said:
ďMay the tax suggested by Nobel Prize Laureate James Tobin be imposed in a reasonable and effective way on the current speculative operations accounting for trillions of US dollars every 24 hours, then the United Nations, which cannot go on depending on meager, inadequate, and belated donations and charities, (A: CharitiesÖ itís multi-trillion foundations.) will have one trillion US dollars annually to save and develop the world. (A: Ha, ha, ha.) Given the seriousness and urgency of the existing problems, which have become a real hazard for the very survival of our specie on the planet, that is what would actually be needed before it is too late.Ē
Cuba's erstwhile "Maximum Leader" would find few to disagree with him over at the Tobin Tax Campaign and Policy Network, which includes dozens of groups of the far Left, such as the National Lawyers Guild, the Institute for Policy Studies, Friends of the Earth, World Federalists Association, Rainforest Action Network, Oxfam, the World Council of Churches, (A: Yep! See, you join these groups and then they go into conferences that Mr Rockefeller set up, the World Council of Churches... you are just being used.) the Commission on Global Governance, and the AFL-CIO.
The AFL-CIO, however, apparently realizes that a Tobin tax is more politically feasible if the revenues generated from it are promised to spending on domestic programs, rather than the UN, though it is not averse to funding UN projects as well.
Most news stories paint the Obama administration as being firmly against any type of Tobin tax, with much being made of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's (A: By the way, the links are all on here, even Geithnerís reported opposition.) reported opposition to Gordon Brown's Tobin proposal at last November's G20 summit. Geithner's anti-Tobin comments may or may not reflect genuine opposition by the administration to the transaction tax; there is ample reason for suspecting that the announced opposition is mere posturing and maneuvering, and that Team Obama may be planning a strategic flip-flop on the issue. (A: And it will happen.) After all, that is what Gordon Brown did; before becoming a top Tobin advocate, he was a leading opponent.
By they way, itís great in Canada. I can remember when the NAFTA treaty was coming in, after the Free Trade negotiations had already been done. I think Brian Mulroney for the conservatives said he was fighting it. He was fighting NAFTA and thatís what he ran his ticket on. He got in and two weeks after he got in it was all over the papers, heíd suddenly changed his mind and he was now the leading advocate for NAFTA. Then after we all got sick of him and voted in the left wing, the liberals, then Chretien, he ran his ticket on the same thing. He was against NAFTA and sure enough, within a month he was now the leading advocate for NAFTA; he had a sudden change of heart. So they are ALL, all the boys belong to the same club.
There is no such thing as left wing and right wing anymore. If fact there really hasnít been in the past; there really hasnít been. They all get paid to get in there by the same big multi-trillionaires. And do you think they are just free gifts they are giving them? No. Thatís a payoff you are givenÖ to do as you are told. Carroll Quigley said himself, that the United States for instance, and he meant Britain too and good part of Europe. He says, for the last 60 years has been run by this organization. He meant the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs. He said, they always put in the tops for elections, the tops of all parties for elections, and their top advisors are put in there as well, their vice presidents and so on. So itís just been a game for the public to believe in, as they manage us along into this new, brave new world, but first going into the Orwellian phase of it Ė itís actually a mixture of the two right now Ė to bring out their final outcome. And thatís what we are living through. We are just living through a script, as I say, and they must keep us placated and stupid and dumb with fairly, although minimalistically plausible answers. And thatís whatís done to us.
Itís astonishing too what is happening in the States. When you see legislators going through the motions of madness, in a sense, this article, again, should be an April Fools Day thing but itís not, itís true. I think itís from Raw Story; itís in other papers as well.
No Joke: South Carolina Now Requires ĎSubversivesí to Register
(A: Öwith the government! No kidding.)
Raw Story - February 5, 2010
Terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now register with South Carolinaís Secretary of State and declare their intentions ó or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.
The stateís ďSubversive Activities Registration Act,Ē passed last year and now officially on the books, states that ďevery member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States Ö shall register with the Secretary of State.Ē (A: Well you see, theyíve got most of them already there already, and thatís the corporations of America, because their leaders have been leading you into this new global system run by the United Nations from before you were born. Can you imagine they are actually asking you to do this? And they are even charging you a $5 filing fee.)
Thereís even a $5 filing fee. (A: A $5 filing fee to get put on the books.)
By ďsubversive organization,Ē the law means ďevery corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [or] of this State.Ē (A: [Alan laughing.] And you can get a PDF if you want and download it as well.)
Itís quite the world we are in. I wonder too, youíll probably get some idiots that will go and register with it as well. Itís amazing. I guess the choice then is prison or the looney bin, and perhaps they think the food is better in prison. I donít know, but it does make you wonder doesnít it? People were talking about the big pharmaís push, through the FDA and other organizations, to do with getting the alternate natural health products off the shelves. Itís happened across Europe; they are heavily regulated now. They put a lot of people out of business. They are trying to do the same here. It was all signed, again, through the United Nations, our big brother. This article is about big pharmaís push through Canada.
Stop selling unlicensed natural health remedies: pharmacy regulators
The National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA) says pharmacists cannot be assured the products are safe until they are granted a government licence
Tom Blackwell, nationalpost.com / Feb. 6, 2010 (A: In Canada; itís for the States too.)
Makers of natural-health products say they are bracing for widespread layoffs and millions of dollars in losses after Canadaís pharmacy regulators issued a surprise directive recently urging druggists to stop selling unlicensed natural remedies.
The order affects thousands of herbal treatments, multi-vitamins and other products, most of them waiting for approval from Health Canada under a backlogged, five-year-old program to regulate natural-health goods.
The National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities (NAPRA) says pharmacists cannot be assured the products are safe until they are granted a government licence, and should not sell them in those circumstances. (A: Now, the National Association of Pharmacy Regulatory Authorities, these are the guys who basically are the front men for the pharma groups, just like the FDA is in the US. I read the thing the other day where they had uncovered documents and mail between big pharma to members within the FDA to do with advocating, the enquiry, and being all for Ritalin and so on being given to youngsters. Thatís what they said at, I think, the company Eli Lilly. They said, we have 5 doctors there on the board who are our friends, they are friendly to our company; they will be on our side. And they named them too, who these doctors were. There is a video up as well on YouTube about them and you will see these guys. So here you have the same thing in Canada. Everything is corrupt really. There is nothing there for what you think they are there for. They are all on the payroll of somebody else.) ďPharmacists are obliged to hold the health and safety of the public or patient as their first and foremost consideration,Ē (A: So again, they give you a plausible reason.) said the associationís recently issued position statement.
Representatives of the natural health industry, however, have reacted angrily to the directive issued last month, predicting it will have little impact on patient safety, while triggering an economic ďcrisisĒ for their members.
ďWe are talking about job loss, we are talking about a lot of income loss, we are talking about product stuck in warehouses that cannot be sold,Ē Jean-Yves Dionne, a spokesman for the Canadian Health Food Association, said in an interview.
A statement issued by the association calls the directive self-serving and contrary to federal government policy.
ďIt has taken a sledge hammer to a finishing nail,Ē the group said. ďIt will create confusion for consumers. It is the wrong thing to do.Ē
NAPRA is comprised of representatives of the provincial colleges of pharmacy that regulate the profession. It is now up to the individual provinces to implement the statement. The Ontario and Quebec colleges have already done so, with Ontario pressing pharmacists to not buy or order any more of the affected products, and its neighbour pushing for druggists to also remove unlicensed product already on their shelves, Mr. Dionne said.
Pharmacies, as surprised by the directive as anyone, are caught in the middle, said Jeff Poston of the Canadian Pharmacists Association.
ďOne of the questions that everybody is asking in the pharmacy world is, ĎWhy now?í As far as people can determine, nothing has significantly changed.Ē (A: Well a lot has changed. They had the big global meeting about it at the United Nations to do with this and certain people, myself included, have mentioned it in the past that this was going to happen. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I think there is time to get Stefan from Germany on the line if heís there. Are you there Stefan?
Stefan: Thanks for taking my call. Iíve got a question regarding the European Union. I would like if you could tell, in your opinion, what does the flag of European Union signify, the first one.
Alan: I havenít looked at it too closely to be honest with you. Thereís a blue background; blue in the societies always stood for something under law. Thatís why most police in the Western countries wore the blue uniform, before they turned to the black of the executioner for this era. So blue generally stands for law, by the force of law. Then you have the white stars; itís a circle of white stars. Very interesting there are 12 of them. They said at the beginning that even though they might have 30 or 40 or more members, theyíd always keep the 12 originating states on that flag; they wouldnít add to it. If you look at Benjamin Franklin who was a member of the Rosicrucian Society and also the English Lodge Society; he was also a member of the Hellfire Club at the Dashwood Club in England. He said he hoped that the federation of the United States would be eventually a federation of the world. Thatís what it was to lead to. He said it wouldnít be run by a government as such. He said, it would be run by 12 wise men, because they brought the Cabala into it of course, just like Albert Pike did later on. So you have the 12 rulers. There are always 12 rulers that are always in the background, the wise men who give the orders to the puppet governments in front of them basically. These 12 men are steeped in the agenda.
I was going to mention before, itís the same with the books from the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations; they are always funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. They will state in every book, we are a non-political organization. Now you think, my god, they are into every part of politics. They are correct; they do not play politics. They control an agenda. So they are not in politics; they control an agenda, including controlling the politicians. So they are telling you a truth there. We have never had democracy. Weíve had an agenda on the go. Democracy was the means to get everybody to go along with it and this agenda was on the table. When Karl Marx wrote about a regional society, regional blocs of trading nations, back in the 1800s, he was also in on the agenda, as were quite a few others, very top players at that time. They are going along with the agenda. After using the world through our tax money, through our militaries to bring in a world society, through NATO, the UN, and so on, itís time now to take those countries apart, into smaller regions and break them up so they can, as Tony Blair said when he was Prime Minister of Britain, flood the countries with so much multiculturalism that Britain will never, ever be English again. Thatís what he said.
How Labour threw open doors to mass migration
in secret plot to make a multicultural UK
By James Slack / dailymail.co.uk / 10th February 2010
Thatís what he said and I read the article from the newspaper. Itís happened. This is a deliberate agenda to destroy all the old existing nations so we can all be ruled by the few in a totalitarian manner, and we canít come together as peoples anymore with things in common to fight them. Thatís a technique of warfare. Thanks for calling; thatís the end of the show coming in.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Britain Divided into Trans-National Regions
European Parliament's New Map of Britain-Dividing the Cake
Labour Government and Secret Deal to Create Overwhelming Multicultural Society to Render all Opposition "Out of Date"
Global Taxes on the Agenda Again
If You are a Subversive, You Must Register with S. Carolina's Secretary of State-No Kidding
Pharmacy Regulators Issue Ban on Druggists Selling Unlicenced Natural Health Products
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"