Jan. 26, 2010 (#500)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 26, 2010:
Reality -- Get it Flowing by Contemplative Knowing:
"A Reality Check Can Take Some Doing,
Do You Lead or Tend to Follow, Cheering or Boo-ing,
The Longest Journey Starts with the Self,
Uncomfortable Denials Taken Down Off Shelf,
Malodorously Opened One by One,
Critically Examined till All is Done,
With a New Understanding of Who You Are,
You'll See Deeply into Things, You'll Go Far,
Then Take a Stand for All that's Good,
Free Others with Wisdom, You Must and Should"
© Alan Watt Jan. 26, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 26, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 26th 2010. For the newcomers to the show, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Youíll notice all the other sites I have up there, bookmark them for future use. In fact itís a good idea to use the alternate sites once in a while for download because everyone goes into the .com site at once at it tends to give you a slow or a sticky download. The official sites are: [listed above]. These sites are only the ones that are mine so anything else you see isnít mine, if itís pretending to be and there are quite a few out there that do pretend to be. Sometimes you get them in spates in fact, they come and go. I should remind you that I am the only host really where the audience brings the host to themselves. You do that by donating or buying that which I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those that get the disks burned and passed to them, you can write to me at [address above]. As I say, itís important that you buy the materials that I have for sale or you can donate to me. Donít wait for other people to donate, everybody does and money doesnít come in. I donít make much of aÖ Itís not a living here, believe you me. Itís not a living Iím making here. If I wanted a living Iíd get the sponsors on for the talks during the show and Iíd get paid for doing so, but then Iíd be compromised in some ways. The ads you hear on the show are paid directly by the advertisers to RBN for this air time. It pays RBN for their staff, equipment and their bills and all the rest of the stuff. So YOU have to help me pay my bills by donating. Itís up to you what you want to do.
I go on and on sometimes about different ways that people perceive reality. Itís generally the uniform one and thatís the one of our own indoctrination. Itís a standardized indoctrination weíve had. Weíve had it really since UNESCO was set up and then they put out their mandates via National Educational Associations and Teachers Associations to make sure the world and the youth of the world all got the same indoctrination so weíd all see things the same way. Thatís why you can go to other countries and you can chat on the same level never realizing that youíve all been indoctrinated into seeing the world in a specific way. We never really get a hold of reality. How can you get reality when they can spray the skies daily for 12 years now and use HAARP along with it, cause floods, droughts and all the rest of it, and they wonít talk about it? Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning that we are never let in on reality because no one will talk about it. They certainly wonít talk about it in any government circles, at least not to the general public. In fact that was admitted in Canada when a politician from Sudbury went to the federal government and asked to know why they were spraying the skies so heavily, all these jets Ė this was about 2 or 3 years ago. The reply from the Minister of Defence, who spoke up, said that we donít have to answer that question because obviously it comes under some sort of official secrets act or national security. Thatís how they get away with this. We are told to deny our senses and of course, it takes complicity of the media to make it all work that way. There is nothing new about that, believe you me.
Itís the same too with David Kelly. David Kelly was the scientist who came out against Tony Blair. Tony Blair was the one-man band in Britain to go ahead with the Afghanistani and then the Iraq war. He was all for it. He was like a wind-up toy, the little rabbit with the drums and the cymbals just clashing away with his mantra on they have to go to war. David Kelly came out and spoke out and said that it was all nonsense. He had all the data and he told Tony Blair there were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and so on. This article is from the Mail Online.
David Kelly post mortem (Alan: Thatís the autopsy.) to be kept secret for 70 years as doctors accuse Lord Hutton of concealing vital information
By Miles Goslett / Mail Online / 23rd January 2010
Vital evidence which could solve the mystery of the death of Government weapons inspector Dr David Kelly will be kept under wraps for up to 70 years.
Thatís under the Official Secrets Act. Isnít that incredible? Isnít it amazing too, that this man was killed, murdered, just before he was due to testify before the Supreme Court on what he knew, with all the nonsense to do with Blair and this phony war they were drumming up. Quite something. Now theyíve put it under wraps for 70 years. 70 yearsÖ because they know darn well it proves that he was murdered, you see. Thatís the REAL world. Thatís the real world in which we live. Itís nothing to do with the farces the media feeds us generally. Itís the real world. Believe you me, down through history, at the top of power there are always assassination squads. Always. There always have been and always will be assassination squadsÖ in every country.
I always think we really havenít changed at all, not really. We have this idea that somehow weíre more genteel today, weíre more civilized today, and all that nonsense but that really is nothing more than a great propaganda exercise which has been very successfulÖ to conceal the harsh realities of the world. With power comes absolute terror at times and with power comes the right to kill, to destroyÖ and then lie to the public. In the old days, they didnít have to lie; theyíd just kill people, assassinate them and say well, so what; what are you going to do about it? Today, they have to go through the lying game and itís just astonishing. This is so common, this kind of thing happens, that itís utterly disgusting.
Iíll put these links up for you to read at your leisure at the end of the show on cuttingthroughthematrix.com. I read articles across the world to show you how this global society Ė this wonderful global society theyíre calling it, or the global plantation as the rest of us call it Ė is coming together. Iíve said for many years, eventually you will pay for everything, for water, food Ė food will be rationed, so will water Ė and all the rest of it. This is from The National News from Ireland. Itís from the Independent.
Homes face annual Ä400 water charge in meter plan
By Fiach Kelly Political Correspondent / Tuesday January 26 2010 / Independent.ie
(A: Thatís about $700. Now, Ireland is one of the wettest countries in Europe. One of the wettest countriesÖ itís always raining. Itís like the North of Scotland, itís always raining. Thatís why weíre so short, you grow until you are 20 and then you start shrinking again. Itís always darn well raining. There is no LACK of water. So here they go with putting meters on your water supply and charging you all this money for it. Itís going to go up too. See, itís a PRIVILEGE to have water. Itís a privilege to have anything in this socialist, Marxist, brave new worldÖ run by bankers.)
HOUSEHOLDERS face the prospect of steadily increasing water charges once a metering system is introduced.
The Department of Finance has already proposed an interim charge of Ä175per annum, which would yield Ä200m for the Government.
But Environment Minister John Gormley yesterday raised the possibility that the final bill for householders could be substantially higher, after he revealed he ultimately hopes to raise Ä1bn.
A Department of Finance briefing document prepared for An Bord Snip last summer said a flat-rate charge of Ä175 per house would bring in Ä200m even before metering starts.
Itís all to do with cash of course. Remember too, theyíre putting in meters for everybodyís electric bills in the houses, as well as these meters. Smart meters, they are called. They can actually read it remotely and they can cut you off remotely as well. Eventually, once theyíre up and operating, theyíre going to go into giving you a set amount, according to how many live in that house, and if you go over it they will cut you off until you agree to pay extra. This is all on the cards. You know, blackmail is blackmail. Thatís all it is, extortion. Extortion.
There is a site here and it says,
Happiness in Slavery
January 25th, 2010 / revoltoftheplebs.wordpress.com
ďAmericaís Impending Master Class DictatorshipĒ, Mr. Dougherty crunches some numbers for us and finds: ďAccording to the Federal Reserveís most recent report on wealth, Americaís private net worth was $53.4 trillion as of September, 2009. But at the same time, Americaís debt and unfunded liabilities totaled at least $120,000,000,000,000.00 ($120 trillion), or 225% of the citizensí net worth. Even if the government expropriated every dollar of private wealth in the nation, it would still have a deficit of $66,600,000,000,000.00 ($66.6 trillion), equal to $214,286.00 for every man, woman and child in America and roughly 500% of GDP. If the government does not directly seize the nationís private wealth, then it will require $389,610 from each and every citizen to balance the countryís books.Ē
Quite something eh? And yet theyíre spending like crazy. Why? Because you see, the system isnít intended to go on forever. Itís only important that we keep working for this thing called money while WE bring the new world order IN for them. WE work it out. WE go into the army. WE basically make up the army. WE are the workers who build all their weaponry. WE build their cities of the future for them. THEN they pull the plug. They will be living elsewhere in these Super Cities. THEY are not left with the tab, WE are. Weíll have a completely different system by then too, all rations no doubt.
Hereís what coming too, for the US and Canada because Britain is the PREMIER, itís the flagship for the whole planet. This article actually comes from New Zealand but itís happening elsewhere as well, in the British Commonwealth.
Rates unpaid? Councils dip into mortgages
By ESTHER HARWARD - Sunday Star Times 24/01/2010
(A: Councils are dipping into peoplesí mortgages DIRECTLY.)
COUNCILS HAVE taken millions of dollars in unpaid rates directly from homeowners' mortgages in the past year.
A little-known legal clause gives local authorities the right to force people's banks or finance companies to cover unpaid rates Ė at worst this can put mortgages into default, with the ultimate sanction being the sale of a home from under the owner's feet. (A: This is for back taxes.)
Instances of councils dipping into mortgages have climbed since the global downturn hit in late 2008. The Sunday Star-Times has obtained figures which show that in the 12 months to July 2009:
Auckland City Council took $5.34 million in unpaid rates out of 3840 mortgages (up from $1.86m out of 2205 mortgages in 2005/2006).
Thatís going straight into your bank accountÖ and just taking the cash. Then he gives a list of other cities where itís happened as well and different Councils doing it. THATíS what we have to look forward to. This is the NEW freedom that Mr. Bush mentioned. Donít believe there is any difference between Bushís regime and Obamaís regime; itís the same regime. This is the new freedom where they have the freedom to go into everything, do everything TO you, with you, including going into your bank account, as they up your taxes and your property taxes and everything other kind of tax. They just go straight into your bank account, grab the loot and steal it basically. Itís called stealing. It doesnít matter what other fancy word they give it. Stealing is stealing; itís a simple as that isnít it. Thatís the brave new world we are in to.
We talk about rights. Do you know in Britain too, that they have done away with the trial juriesÖ something that theyíve had for about 800 years? PoofÖ they just put it off the books, with the Fabian government thatís in right now. Yep. You get tried the old way. The old magistrate used to come out with his big wig and heíd meet all the people who were condemned before they went into his courtroom and theyíd all give him bribes. They would take gold and cuts and stuff in the Middle Ages and various bribes and thatís how you would get a leaner penalty. In fact, thatís how, I think, it was Francis Bacon lost his job as a magistrate, for taking bribes at the Court of Queen Elizabeth the 1st. And here itís all back again. Isnít that wonderfulÖ this progress? Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. You often wonder just how stupid people can get. Unfortunately you always find out, there is no end to it really because marketers know how to switch them on, as a herd basically. They donít go for individuals in marketing, they tend to go for the whole herd and they KNOW what turns them on and off. They know how to manipulate their unconscious desires, dreams, hopes and all the rest of it, even their jealousies or envy. Bernays went all through that in his own writings, as he created the commercial society for the US, but it didnít stop with him. It didnít start with him either.
Hereís an article to do with the next step of putting up info on the net, voluntarily of course. Itís called CNet News and it came out in 2009.
Blippy launches the Twitter of personal finance
by Rafe Needleman / December 14, 2009 / cnet.com
Blippy is one of those ideas that at first sounds so hilariously misguided that you'd be forgiven to think it a joke: It's a service (A: Ha!) that hooks into your credit card so everything you buy gets broadcast to your friends. Eventually you'll even be able to Twitter your spending. Ack!
Fortunately, the real story is more nuanced, more interesting, and more intelligent than you might think if all you read is the knee-jerk Twitter posts from people like me.
I talked today to Blippy co-founder Philip Kaplan about the service. He admits, "When we launched it, we thought we were kind of crazy." But I do believe he is on to something, and it has more to do with collecting your financial data than sharing it.
Blippy lets you hook credit and debit cards into the service, as well as accounts at online stores like Amazon, Zappos, and Apple's iTunes store. Eventually it may even connect to physical retail, like Safeway. Blippy's very useful trick, which the company is still working on refining, will be collecting your financial transaction data at a very granular level. It will tell you not just where you're spending money, but what products you're spending it on and--if you set up the privacy settings appropriately--who else is buying the same stuff as you. (A: Ha. So you can find out. Ha-ah!) It will combine all your spending data into one big stream and let you compare your purchase data to that of other people (A: You know, your friends, your friendsÖ are you one up on your friends.), again at a granular level. (A: Thatís the nonsense that they are doing. And you know something? Well, I donít have to tell you, itís going to work, right. Youíve seen enough of whatís happening today so I wonít go into that.)
As I said before, we have this illusion that somehow weíve become civilized today. We live in a scientific age and weíre not so superstitious. Although they created the new age to replace all the other religions, but science really rules. We are MATURE now, very mature and people treat us maturely and they donít have that class distinction do they? You donít notice any of that do you? No. Iím sure you donít. Then every so often out comes a statement like thisÖ which is said and made sport of by the media because itís being said in public. Believe you me, Iíve heard enough of the bigwigs talk amongst themselves and this is EXACTLY HOW they talk about the poor, when they go into their little eugenical rants. This is from someone who is running for the governorship.
'Don't feed the poor, they'll only breed'
January 25, 2010 / Times Online
(A: Thatís quoted straight out of, I think it was one of the HG Wellsí books. HG Wells said the same thing: if you feed the poor, they will only breed. In fact what he said was, if you help them and you feed them more and you give them work, what do they do? They turn around and breed. So hereís this guy running for governorship and he says, donít feed the poor, they will only breed.)
And now for a message from Andre Bauer, a South Carolinian gubernatorial candidate.
In a town hall meeting over the weekend, and in the presence of state lawmakers and more than 100 residents, he expressed his view that:
"My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed.
"You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much further than that. And so what you've got to do is you've got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better." (A: So in other words, you starve them eh?)
Afterwards, he told the State newspaper that 'he could have chosen his words more carefully when he compared people who take public assistance to stray animals [but]... a furor over his comments doesn't change this fact: South Carolina needs to have an honest conversation about the cycle of government dependency among its poorest residents.'
So there you go. Yep, weíve really become more humane and civilized. Mind you, I guess in the Marxist/Fabian society if they euthanized you, because youíre poor, then Ė and Iím not kidding about this Ė they would say thatís humane. Iíve read other books from Fabians in the early 20th century and further beyond in fact, who actually advocated that and said it was a very humane way to do it. Put them out in their sleep so they donít feel any painÖ that was humane, after all, if theyíre going to go through a life of suffering, being poor. Boy, oh boy. So thatís the world that we live in, as I say.
I mentioned last night that the top characters in the IPCC at the United Nations, the guys that make their living on scaring the public of the world to give all their rights away to the global warming scam, get grants, even personally. Theyíre on a winner, they canít lose; itís cash, cash, cash. This is from The Times Online.
UN climate chief Rajendra Pachauri (A: This is the chief, right.)
'got grants through bogus claims'
From The Sunday Times / January 24, 2010 / Jonathan Leake, Science and Environment Editor
The chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has used bogus claims that Himalayan glaciers were melting to win grants worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), based in New Delhi, was awarded up to £310,000 by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the lion's share of a £2.5m EU grant funded by European taxpayers. (A: It went to his own Delhi based corporation, so heís got a couple of jobs on the side. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix reading an article about Rajendra Pachauri who got an awful lot on money in grants for his personal company on the side and through the bogus climate/glacier melting scam thatís been exposed as a PURE SCAM recently; Iíve read the articles on the radio this last week or so. Itís admitted to that it was a scam BUT that doesnít stop the cash from flowing in to these crooks. I also mentioned too, that the UN had stopped investigating itself, thereís that much corruption within it, they just gave up and stopped rather than finding more. It says hereÖ
Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute (A: Thatís his own company.) (TERI), based in New Delhi, was awarded up to £310,000 by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and the lion's share of a £2.5m EU grant funded by European taxpayers.
It means that EU taxpayers are funding research into a scientific claim about glaciers that any ice researcher should immediately recognise as bogus. The revelation comes just a week after The Sunday Times highlighted serious scientific flaws in the IPCC's 2007 benchmark report on the likely impacts of global warming.
The IPCC had warned that climate change was likely to melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 - an idea considered ludicrous by most glaciologists. Last week a humbled IPCC retracted that claim and corrected its report. (A: Because it was made on speculation. There was no investigation at all, just speculation by ONE person and they all ran with it. Isnít that wonderful? What they should do too, since the IPCC has retracted the claim, maybe they should give back the money to the tax payers of Europe. How about that Mr. Pachauri? Hmm? I doubt youíll do that though. I doubt youíll do that, Mr. Pachauri, youíre utterly corrupt.)
Since then (A: They are still putting in grants for TERI.), however, The Sunday Times has discovered that the same bogus claim has been cited in grant applications for TERI.
One of them, announced earlier this month just before the scandal broke, resulted in a £310,000 grant from Carnegie. (A: And on and on it goes.)
The Carnegie money was specifically given to aid research into "the potential security and humanitarian impact on the region" (A: Thatís where the Himalayas are and itís been admitted that no, they are not melting at all.) as the glaciers began to disappear. Pachauri has since acknowledged that this threat, if it exists, will take centuries to have any serious effect. (A: SoÖ aarrgh. What can you say, eh? What can you say?)
Corruption rules the world, you see; all these big international organizationsÖ utterly, thoroughly corrupt. Youíve got to understand too, the temptation, when all these other blocs, like the Soviet EU bloc that we have today, is throwing millions in grants all over the place and there is little oversight into it. The temptation at the United Nations must be awfully high just to fill your pockets. I think itís more than their pockets. I think they bring their whole wardrobes along to stuff it in thereÖ and their underwear, even their spare underwear perhaps. They certainly are making a killing on all of this stuff and this scare mongering is good for business.
People donít realize that this global society is to get taxed into the grave. It already is being taxed into the grave but they donít realize that Europe has for a long time - for many years, even before they officially were joined together - were paying a Value Added Tax [VAT] on every purchase. I can remember when it was like 15%. They brought it out and said it was only for LUXURY items that you donít really need, like binoculars and things like that. Before you knew it, it was across the board on everything, as we all knew it would be. But itís going up to 20% now on EVERYTHING THAT YOU BUY. 20% Value Added TaxÖ because Britain is so broke, as theyíre spending billions on warfare and all that kind of stuff.
20% VAT 'looming' as ministers (A: Thatís politicians.) face mounting debt crisis
22nd January 2010 / Mail Online
A hike in VAT is Ďinevitableí after the election as the government grapples with a mounting debt crisis, experts warned yesterday.
The Treasury will have to lift the tax from 17.5 per cent to 20 per cent to raise an extra £12 billion of revenue a year, according to analysts at consultancy Oxford Economics.
The next Government may also have to delay the state retirement age to 68 (A: So here they go again. Theyíre hoping you die before you can retire.) in order to cope with the biggest debt crisis since the Second World War, the report said. (A: Oh, these bankers are amazing eh? Theyíre all getting billions in bonuses, dishing it out right now, divvying it up, and the schmucks down below are all paying for it and are going to get taxed more and more to give FUTURE bailouts to the same bankers.)
The warning came as official figures revealed the UK government has borrowed almost £330 million a day so far in the current financial year - the most on record.
Figures from the International Monetary Fund show the UK has seen the sharpest increase in its debt burden of any Group of Seven nation since the start of the financial crisis.
Neil Blake of Oxford Economics said: ĎThere appears to be a political consensus that spending cuts should form the bulk of the tightening but we canít see how the necessary adjustments can be made without further tax rises too.
Theyíve also gone inÖ. What was it Blair Ė first Fabian Blair, now Fabian Brown - have just declared that theyíve got to start giving all your money to the third world to help them cope with global warming and to help THEM put filters on smoke stacks and all this kind of stuff. You know, the communist plank that said the redistribution of wealth. Well, theyíre going ahead with all of that and then jacking up everything back home as well. See, we all work for the government. That was the ideal state remember, for the Fabian ideology and Marxism too; everyone ends up working for the government and itís going to come across the board. In Canada they brought it in under the guise of the general sales tax, with Brian Mulroney. He said at the time, this will help pay off the national debt you see; no comment. Then when he was leaving he was asked if the national debt was going down because of the GST and he says, well, not one penny, actually, has gone towards that; no comment. And that was that. Thatís how it was done.
Lies, lies and more liesÖ and we go along with thisÖ because we are trained to go along with it. We adapt and adapt and adapt, the Fabian style adaptation. See, if they gave you a hundred things at once weíd RIOT, but they can get you bending over at airports, they can have cops coming into your homes and officials checking your refrigerators to see what youíre eating and giving you little lectures, and all that kind of stuff, they can put cameras up IN familiesí homes and watch what theyíre up to and all the rest of it. And we adapt and adapt, because itís all done SEPARATELY a BIT AT A TIME. Thatís how you do it in the Fabian style Ė it works very, very well Ė until youíve adapted into a completely new way of living, completely UNRECOGNIZABLE to your predecessors. Thatís how it works.
Now, in Britain there is another thing thatís going on too. Itís happening all over the UK but itís happening in Canada as well. Weíve got drones coming over. These spy drones, they are MILITARY spy drones. I have photographs of some of them getting launched in some of the Great Lakes, off a Special Forces boat. It says hereÖ
CCTV in the sky: police plan to use military-style spy drones
(A: Well, letís chuck out the Ďstyle,í they ARE military spy drones.)
Arms manufacturer BAE Systems developing national strategy with consortium of government agencies
Paul Lewis / The Guardian, Saturday 23 January 2010
Drones could be used for civilian surveillance in the UK as early as 2012. Source: BAE
Police in the UK are planning to use unmanned spy drones, controversially deployed in Afghanistan, for the ≠"routine" monitoring of antisocial (A: Weíre right into the Marxist thing here folks.) motorists, (A: Thatís why theyíve got cameras in the streets, to monitor ANTISOCIAL behavior. Like sticking your tongue out, things like that.) ≠protesters, agricultural thieves (A: Agricultural thievesÖ) and fly-tippers (A: and people who are dumping their garbage because of all the laws and rules and money youíre paying to get rid of your garbage now.), in a significant expansion of covert state surveillance.
How do you stand it? How do you stand it? And these little control freaks, all the way from the top right down to the people that your local councils send outÖ that strut and stare at you. As Robert Burns would have said, Wha struts, an' stares, an' a' that. How do you stand them? Hmm? I tell you, I couldnít. I couldnít. They were already using these things because I remember last year I read an article where the people at the Stonehenge meeting, you know, the guys that wear all the funny gowns and stuff and the protesters and the guys that go for fun. They had spy drones going around them; at the top of the crowd, these things flew back and forth. It was admitted in the papers then. So this article here is just getting you used to the idea of more of them coming.
The arms manufacturer BAE Systems, which produces a range of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for war zones, is adapting the military-style planes for a consortium of government agencies led by Kent police. (A: The police ARE the military now folks. If you canít really quite get that, never mind the way they dress, the way they talk to you even, and all the toys theyíre getting. Thatís the military.)
Documents from the South Coast Partnership, a Home Office-backed project in which Kent police and others are developing a national drone plan (A: A national drone plan.) with BAE, have been obtained by the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act.
They reveal the partnership intends to begin using the drones in time for the 2012 Olympics. They also indicate that police claims that the technology will be used for maritime surveillance fall well short of their intended use Ė which could span a range of police activity Ė and that officers have talked about selling the surveillance data to private companies. A prototype drone equipped with high-powered cameras and sensors is set to take to the skies for test flights later this year.
The Civil Aviation Authority, which regulates UK airspace, has been told by BAE and Kent police that civilian UAVs would "greatly extend" the government's surveillance capacity and "revolutionise policing". The CAA is currently reluctant to license UAVs in normal airspace because of the risk of collisions with other aircraft, but adequate "sense and avoid" systems for drones are only a few years away.
There is no end to how they can spend your cash when you donít have it eh? There is no end to it at all. And yet, hereís an article from Wise Up Journal. They also have The Guardian article in here, especially all the motorists and all the rest of it. Iíll put this link up as well, at the end of the show, with all the rest. It goes into a bit more detailÖ
CCTV in the sky: police plan to use military-style spy drones
Guardian / 23.01.2010 / By Paul Lewis
Behind closed doors, the scope for UAVs has expanded significantly. Working with various policing organisations as well as the Serious and Organised Crime Agency, the Maritime and Fisheries Agency, HM (A: Her Majestyís.) Revenue and Customs and the UK Border Agency, BAE and Kent police have drawn up wider lists of potential uses.
One document lists ď[detecting] theft from cash machines, preventing theft of tractors and monitoring antisocial drivingĒ as future tasks for police drones, while another states the aircraft could be used for road and railway monitoring, search and rescue, event security and covert urban surveillance. (A: Covert urban surveillance. So science fiction is actually here folks. Itís definitely here.)
Alan: Thereís Stephan in Germany. Are you there Stephan?
Stephan: Thanks for taking my call Alan. Iíve got a big question. I wrote it down so please stay with me. After you elaborated on some of the esoteric origins of some of the beliefs of the so-called elite, some years ago you stated in more direct words, not of the time of last yearís. I would like to show you that books and quotations you pointed out are slowly but surely discussed in emerging and assessable shows all over the net. My question is, because there are emerging time lines all over the world, who try to understand all about the roots and then about the branches and because you seem to have such a profound understanding of these matters, shouldnít you feel urged to supply your insight into these matters more frequently, itís sad for me to see you ranting while you could explain more?
Alan: Well, the trouble is that itís hard to, in one-hour shows, take even one particular topic and put so much into it, so much detail. So that really needs a whole lecture series to be done, which I would certainly do if I had the time or staff or something. I donít have any staff. The people themselves, what I would tell them would be so new to them that they tend to shut off their mind. Thatís how it is. Thereís a technique in getting information through to the public into areas that they neverÖ actually, their minds are barred from. You have to gradually weaken that barring process and open it up by a technique so that they can actually sit and listen and crucially think, even critically think, about what you are actually saying, rather than just cut you off because itís out of what they call their normal ken, what they are understanding. There are so many sciences involved in all of this that youíd have to take it very carefully and introduce them into it very carefully. Another thing is that people, having egos - everyone has an ego - and you have to go into areas where you have to be very careful with fragile egos. Youíve got to understand how human ego works and how our personal ego works. That means being more honest with yourself, to understand how all of society is being manipulated with scientific technique by professionals. Most folk are not quite ready, to be honest - even with themselves - as to who they really are, how they really behaved with other people, etc. So Iíd LOVE to do a series about that and to go into all these different techniques as well. Another thing I canít do is to go into certain areas to do with well-known people. Iíve said before that quite often you have leaders presented. Now, some leaders out there that put a lot of information out, on web sites mainly, in an academic format, very academically minded, are actually World Marxists. I know this because they attend World Marxist meetings. The public in America and Canada and elsewhere are oblivious to that. They donít know this. There is so much I do know that would cause so many ripples because once people tend to start following someone and elevate them onto a pedestal, it sounds like sour grapes when someone comes along and knocks that pedestal from underneath their feet; you can be attacked heavily for doing so. But I have the facts about it, this kind of stuff, and I canít really use it. Back with more after this break.
HI folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Just to finish off what Stephan had asked. I definitely would love to get into giving lectures to classes again because itís the fastest way, the BEST way in fact, and the most precise way of going through a whole, not just one science but many different sciences, to show you how they all fit together so that you can go out there and help get engaged in this big battle for humanity and do it in such a way that you can be of real import. But at the same time you wonít be blasted out of the sky by saying too much at the wrong place or at the wrong time. You have to be very, very careful what you say. You must remember too, that the public are fickle. They each have CHOSENÖ most folk choose the area of belief they want to believe and they are not open to go into deeper areas to be shown the big picture. There is a fear, obviously, in seeing the big picture because itís not a good picture at all. Itís a kind of horror show under so-called humane tactics that are being brought in. I even have an article here where an author whoís involved with Dying With Dignity - as they call it, the euthanasia boys - has advocated that euthanasia BOOTHS be set up across Britain and elsewhere for pensioners just to walk in and be euthanized on the spot; just like Soylent Green. Thatís meant to stir controversy; thatís why the book is out there obviously, to get this into the public awareness and then to get it through Parliament. Thatís how they do it. These are the techniques that they use.
Weíll go to Dave in Arizona. Are you there Dave?
Dave: The cashless society is set up for control right?
Dave: The credit cards were put out so we got used to not having cash?
Alan: That was a big part of it but it was also to tide us over in the 70s and 80s and into the 90s when people were going out of work and all the rest of it. Often the credit cards were the only thing that got people through, plus they could buy impulse purchases and reward themselves and feel they were still alive, because theyíd been trained to do that kind of stuff, reward yourself.
Dave: How long do you think we have before they go after the currency all together?
Alan: Well, they already are. What will happen eventually down the road - this is what they plan to do - is to go into another few crises with money that they are just spending like crazy. Itís being used for US to use, to build their machinery for war, for the future structure that they will rule over for their Super Cities abroad and then they will start collapsing the cities back home. They already are actually. Then they will bring in a new crisis system of creditsÖ HG Wells went through this and so did Lord Bertrand Russell. He said, eventually money will be replaced by credits. The government will issue them to every citizen on the Monday of every week. It will start off with the same amount. You canít save up the credits; that will keep the classless society at the bottom. He said, you have to use them up or theyíll simply disappear when they renew your credits. The governments will be in charge of it. See, money is anything that they say it is. Itís only us that must have to accept it and really believe it works.
Dave: Right. So, I guess my point is that eventually there will be no form of ulterior currency or anything?
Alan: There will be for a while, Iím sure, an ability to sort of transfer credits into certain banks. The bankers will survive because they are a big part, if not one of the major parts, of this globalized control system. It was the bankers who formed the Milner Group that formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR and helped bring about a whole bunch of wars. They are still behind it today. They are all involved and weíll go into that maybe tomorrow.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Kelly's Autopsy Results put Under Official Secrets Act
Wettest Country in Europe to be Charged for Water Use via Meters
The People's Voice--Personal and National Debt Stats.
Councils Draw Late Property Taxes Directly from Bank Accounts
Share Your Purchases with the World-Marketers' Dream
South Carolina Governor Candidate-"Don't Feed the Poor"
Rajendra Pachauri's Institute Got Millions in Grants over bogus Glacier Melting
UK-20% Value Added Tax on Purchases due to Mounting Debt
Military Spy Drones to be Deployed on Motorists-UK
Transcribed by Diana