Jan. 18, 2010 (#494)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 18, 2010:
The Facts -- Who'll Teach Ya? -- Never the Media:
"Last Thing for Media is Investigative
Following Bimbos on Yachts in Bikinis Cavorting,
Or Change-Nothing Sports or Movie Star Fashion
Worn by Silicone Set, Implanted and Dashin',
For Major News, it's Watered Anemic,
With Torture and Warfare Presented Hygienic,
Facts Behind Events -- They've Nothing to Say
Except 'Be Happy, Have Fun, Go Out and Play,'
In-the-Know Minority are Jaded, Satirical,
Each 'Happening' Planned, it's Geo-Political"
© Alan Watt Jan. 18, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 18, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 18th 2010. For newcomers to the show, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Bookmark all the sites I have up there for future use because sometimes the main site goes down. The official sites are: [listed above]. As always, at the start of the show I mention that you bring me to you… YOU are the listeners, you the audience. I’m not backed by any big foundation or any big company that’s selling products and so on. The ads on the show that you hear are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN. That pays for the air time, their staff and equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you as the listeners to keep me going. You can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, see the books, CDs and DVDs I have for sale or you can donate to me. You’ll find out how to do it on the web sites. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of the shows I do and passed to them to play on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. So that’s my tin can moment, as I rattle the tin can for the pennies.
I often don’t really pick the topics of the night’s show until the last moment because there is so much to choose from. So much of it too, really, in a sense, is trivia or irrelevant or it will simply get phased out by tomorrow’s news. We are dished out so much news today you can’t keep up with it and that’s part of the technique of data overload, as they call it. With data overloads, it’s hard to retain what’s relevant and hard to even remember what to toss OUT of your mind. Your mind can only hold so much and it gets mixed with trivia and fiction until it’s all a fantasy. Some people like the fantasy, they call them conspiracy theorists. That’s the term that the intelligence services decided to GIVE the people at the bottom to use upon themselves and a lot of them will do that. They’ll say, yep, I’m a conspiracy theorist and they sound like a nutcase right away. The key is, you don’t have to guess about things, as to where the world is going. You don’t have to guess about why things are happening. You just have to read the old books because they TOLD you where it was going a long time ago. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s hard to choose topics to talk about today because we are bombarded with them. Funny to think that in the 1960s, some of the big players who are still going today, are still alive today and working very hard at this emerging world society, although I think it’s long, long past here already, they talked about this phase that we’d go through where we’d become involved in a sort of world communication society. In other words, they were talking about the internet that they were going to give us way back then, before most of us had even tried a computer ourselves, or they had one for sale and even universities were limited on the types that they had. But they knew they were going to bring this in because they had got so advanced during the whole Cold War with computers that they knew they could bring it in and make a collective society. They also knew that people would become more ALIENATED from each other during this particular phase as well. We could all be on the NET so to speak, and yet we’d eventually be trained to talk to voiceless entities across the world somewhere and never really meet people. They thought that eventually we might not need the ability, we’d lose the ability to actually communicate directly with other people.
When you think about the effects of television, a lot of that was accomplished even then when whole families would sit and stare at the google box and they wouldn’t talk to each other. They were losing the ability to communicate and interact with each other even then. Then back in the 70s and 80s as more cash through credit cards was available, different members of the family would go off into their own rooms to watch their own television set. That further estranged them as well. The computer is doing much the same kind of thing. As I say, it was all predicted an awful long time ago, before a lot of people were born and long before they came up and told us that they were going to give us this thing called the internet.
What I’m truly saying is that we are living through an agenda. The world is simply an agenda. It’s so interesting too, to read the big boys like Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages, where he puts out the format to the public, the reader, in the way that I call the ACCIDENTAL VIEW OF HISTORY. Trends just appear, the way the RAND Corporation tends to do its announcements in magazines. Trends appear and according to the trends, they predict that we will be doing down the road and we’ll be doing this by the year so and so and so and so. That’s the way that Brzezinski presented his information and YET Brzezinski and the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission had been working their whole lives, and people before they were born too, were at it DIRECTING THE COURSE of the world and the course of the cultures and the course of technology. So it’s so interesting to see him give you the accidental view but never mention the fact that there were big, big players and powerful organizations SHAPING the direction in which we were told to go. Quite fascinating really.
We are supposed to believe in the accidental view. Things just happen by accident, governments get up and try and fix things on the spur of the moment and that’s why it’s so chaotic and that’s why they make mistakes, we’re told. Again, there is nothing further from the truth. The further back you go, reading the books written by the big players, the more evident it becomes that everything that you’ve lived through was predicted by them because they were making it all happen throughout your whole life and where it’s supposed to go, up to the year 2050 and beyond.
Sometimes they will call them futurists as well, the futurists who predict trends. Like any world where they’ve trained, or any reality where they’ve trained the public to follow EXPERTS – as Bertrand Russell said they would and they have – they pick the supposed TOP futurists, the ones who will predict the winning trends. They are the winners, they’re always right. Well, it’s not because they’ve got good crystal balls or because they’ve got more of an acute mental range or something. It’s because they are IN on the big plan, the big agenda. There is an old saying they used to use in different religions and they’d say, ‘make it so.’ Freemasonry still says that. Even Wicca, they say, ‘so mote it be.’ If you put up the experts there who are putting out the trends, it becomes that way because they’ve said it’s going to become that way. The big businesses listen them and they get on board and they actually MAKE it happen. That’s how you direct society. Plus big money is always available to make sure it goes off in that direction.
In the process, we go through many cons and scams to guide us into the new society of a depopulated planet where children are not only irrelevant almost, they really don’t want them. They really, really don’t like children and they especially don’t like children from the middle and lower classes anymore. Both classes have to go. The world that has been decided that’s to come in eventually is for an elite with a technotronic class, the crème-de-la-crème of the technotronic era will work for them and things will be robotic and eventually even computers will be running operations for them in hospitals and things like that. But they don’t need the massive manpower anymore. They’re looking towards the future where sustainability, as they call it, really, since these guys at the top are always terrified that they’ll die off themselves if there is not enough food to go around, they plan to take down the population first – take out your enemy instead – and make it safe for themselves. In the meantime, WE MUST BE TAUGHT THAT WE ARE THE PROBLEM.
WE are the problem. WE are the consumers, WE are the problem. Well, nothing is further from the truth. The same guys – as I say, many of them are still alive today – promoted the consumer age. They promoted it because they needed a strong West. They needed a strong United States of America because they were supplying the tax money and the military force to go across the whole world as the global policeman. Now that the job is coming to a halt - they are right now attacking the last few countries left to be dominated and to be standardized into this system - they will run out of enemies and they won’t need the big military forces. They also know they are going to take down the Western world at the same time as they are finishing off the Middle East and Asia. That’s why the next part of the plan is to bring the military home, a good part of it, integrate it completely and manage the herd as we gradually get taken down the path to annihilation so the elite might survive.
There’s an old saying that used to be said, and still is said actually in some religions. It said that the few must perish for the sake of the many. In this case, it’s the many that must perish for the sake of the few. That’s the big agenda. I’m not kidding about it. They are very strong about this. They are teaching children in school that children, their own offspring, will be unnecessary. There are already volunteers coming out after massive indoctrination at school, scientific indoctrination, and asking for sterilization. That is part of the agenda.
All meat is to be eliminated, meat consumption. Alvin Toffler, another big futurist there, well funded by the big boys, wrote in his book The Third Wave, that the future will be a vegetarian society and it must be so, he said. He didn’t say why it must be so; he just said it must be so. Now we’re getting articles in the media, from the top again, about the need to stop eating all meat because they say it’s too energy consumptive and they want to give you their GMO foods instead… which are full of toxins and poisons and pesticides. That is not what the elites eat of course. We’ll never get access to their stuff. You could never afford it even if you were given the card to get access.
As everything happens there is always another reason for things happening, never the way we are told. This odd thing with Haiti, people forget that the UN has been in that country for years. Canada and the States and other countries have been sending policemen in, with the blue berets for the United Nations. The RCMP goes in there, from Canada, with blue berets. They just never quite seem to get the Haitians to give up all their rights and be dominated and allow all their resources – and there are resources around there, still to be plundered – to give it all away to the big boys. So bang, along comes the earthquake and do they send in massive relief with all the organizations which they have up? No. What they do is they send in the military, masses of military because they have announced that FIRST AND FOREMOST that area of the Caribbean is necessary for the defense of the United States of America, to have hegemony over it. That’s why they’re sending all the troops in.
This article is from Global Research.
The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti:
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
By Michel Chossudovsky / Global Research, January 15, 2010
Haiti has a longstanding history of US military intervention and occupation going back to the beginning of the 20th Century. US interventionism has contributed to the destruction of Haiti's national economy and the impoverishment of its population.
The devastating earthquake is presented to World public opinion as the sole cause of the country's predicament.
A country has been destroyed, its infrastructure demolished. Its people precipitated into abysmal poverty and despair.
Haiti's history, its colonial past have been erased.
The US military has come to the rescue of an impoverished Nation. What is its Mandate?
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
The main actors in America's "humanitarian operation" are the Department of Defense, the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). (See USAID Speeches: On-The-Record Briefing on the Situation in Haiti, 01/13/10). USAID has also been entrusted in channelling food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program. (See USAID Press Release: USAID to Provide Emergency Food Aid for Haiti Earthquake Victims, January 13, 2010) (Alan: I’m going to talk more about the World Food Program when I come back from this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from Global Research to do with Haiti and the emergency aid that’s supposedly going in there right now. It’s a massive military invasion when you look at it from another point of view. It talks about how the USAID has been entrusted to channel food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program.
The World Food Program is a very interesting program to go into. It’s tied in with the World Agricultural agency at the United Nations because in their mandate when they set up the different parts of the UN, they were set up to be eventually parts of a global structure. That department for agriculture was to be responsible, down the road – which might not be too far – to distribute ALL food to ALL regions; they’ve got the world broken up into regions and that includes the Americas as well, one day. They said at the time, when they set it up, that they will give a set amount of food to every region and you must keep your population down below a certain level because they won’t increase the food. So it’s interesting to see TRAIL runs, in a sense, always being used by the United Nations. That’s what they are, trial runs.
The military component of the US mission, however, tends to overshadow the civilian functions of rescuing a desperate and impoverished population. The overall humanitarian operation is not being led by civilian governmental agencies such as FEMA or USAID, but by the Pentagon.
The dominant decision making role has been entrusted to US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
A massive deployment of military hardware and personnel is contemplated. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has confirmed that the US will be sending nine to ten thousand troops to Haiti, including 2000 marines. (American Forces Press Service, January 14, 2010)
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships has already arrived in Port au Prince. (January 15, 2010). The 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit as well as and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division "are trained in a wide variety of missions including security and riot-control in addition to humanitarian tasks." (A: Do you ever get the impression it’s going to come back home eventually? That’s what it is. It’s a training exercise too.)
In contrast to rescue and relief teams dispatched by various civilian organizations, the humanitarian mandate of the US military is not clearly defined:
“Marines are definitely warriors first, and that is what the world knows the Marines for,... [but] we’re equally as compassionate when we need to be, and this is a role that we’d like to show -- that compassionate warrior, (A: That’s kind of contradictory.) reaching out with a helping hand for those who need it. We are very excited about this.” (Marines' Spokesman, (A: Remember, that’s Public Relations when you have a spokesman.) Marines Embark on Haiti Response Mission, Army Forces Press Services, January 14, 2010)
While presidents Obama and Préval spoke on the phone, there were no reports of negotiations between the two governments regarding the entry and deployment of US troops on Haitian soil. The decision was taken and imposed unilaterally by Washington. The total lack of a functioning government in Haiti was used to legitimize, on humanitarian grounds, the sending in of a powerful military force, which has de facto taken over several governmental functions. (A: Then it goes on with the different ships that are in the area.)
US Military Assets to be Sent to Haiti. (according to official announcements)
The amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) and amphibious dock landing ships USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) and USS Carter Hall (LSD 50).
A 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division. 900 soldiers are slated to arrive in Haiti by January 15th.
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships. (arrived in Port au Prince on January 15, 2010): USS Carl Vinson CVN 70
The hospital ship USNS Comfort (A: ONE hospital ship.)
Several U.S. Coast Guard vessels and helicopters (A: And on and on it goes. It’s like an invasion.)
But what makes you feel better too, it’s like after the big tsunami, remember a few years ago, where they said that every country would match, every government would match every charity dollar with a dollar of tax money for the relief funds. Billions were collected. Billions of dollars were collected and then after it was all in they announced that they’d put Bill Clinton and George Bush Sr in charge of the fund and that’s the last you heard of it. I said that at the time too, that will be the last you hear of it because those poor guys over there where the tsunami hit will be gathering up bits of tin and wood and knocking back some shacks together again without any aid at all arriving, and that pretty well is what happened. Well, they put the same two boys in charge of the fund for Haiti so we feel much better now, as two men you can truly trust right?
This is the farce that we’re living through. It’s geopolitics. Remember what these guys say at the top too, even though they can certainly cause earthquakes; that was even questioned at one point with a ship, a submarine in the area of the last tsunami, because they have submarines which can actually lay bombs, drill them into the fault lines and explode them, going back as far as the 1960s. Regardless of that, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and all of its members always say they can take some catastrophe and turn it to their advantage, for the geopolitical agenda. That will be done with Haiti regardless of what caused it, natural or otherwise.
It’s quite funny to watch the farce between Google… Now Google is one of the top players in collecting all data across the planet for those who rule us. They keep it forever, all data, all kinds of data. I’ve read articles from some of their bosses in fact admitting to all of this. They’re going through this spat with China over censorship because up until now…
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Google and its spat with China over censorship. It’s kind of like the pot calling the kettle black. Here’s Google gathering data for security services across the planet on EVERY single person on the planet and they’ve been cooperating with China up until recently, supposedly, and censoring their own dissidents. A dissident in China is someone who questions anything in the regime, something that’s going to happen here too; actually it already is happening here. This is from V3.co.uk.
Google to end censorship of Chinese searches
Company threatens to pull out of China after human rights hacking
Iain Thomson in San Francisco, V3.co.uk 13 Jan 2010
Google has issued a shock announcement that it is to end censoring the results of its Google.cn search engine, after a series of hacking attacks that it says was aimed at human rights activists. (A: Now did anybody ask us about did we mind getting our material kept and snaggled by Google for all the top guys? No. They didn’t ask us, for the top boys to listen to it. But here they are making a pretense of standing up for the human rights activists in China. [Alan laughing.])
The company said in a posting on its corporate blog that Google and at least 20 other companies had been the target of a hacking attack in December.
Google claims to have seen evidence that the attacks were aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists.
"These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered, combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web, have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China," wrote David Drummond, chief legal officer at Google.
"We have decided that we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all.
"We recognise that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China." (A: Well we’ll see what happens there. As I say, what a farce. Here they are making a big deal about China when Google admits it’s been collecting data since it set itself up. It’s collecting data on all of us with everything FOR the security intelligence agencies. Such a farce isn’t it.)
The BBC has the MET Office, that’s their weather office, a big, big organization for the BBC. It’s totally on board of course with the new world order because the BBC works FOR the British government. It’s paid for by the tax money and it has political agendas, always has had. It was set up in fact, to be the propaganda arm of the British parliamentary system… and nothing has changed. This article is from the BBC to do with its weather department that’s all for the global warming; it’s a rah-rah team for global warming and all that stuff.
Met Office rethink on forecasts
By Roger Harrabin / Environment analyst, BBC News
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather. (A: These are the guys who are the experts, right, that are all on board with global warming. They failed to predict the extreme weather that Britain and Europe is going through right now.)
Some experts say the Met Office should stop longer-term (A: …statistical projections…) forecasting because it damages the organisation's reputation. (A: Why? Because they are always wrong. They are ALWAYS wrong.)
Others maintain that communication of the forecasts must be improved.
The Met Office has been criticised for failing to predict in its seasonal forecasts the UK would suffer this cold winter or the last three wet summers. (A: They didn’t predict any of them.)
After being rapped for its now notorious "barbecue summer" (A: That never happened right, they got pouring rain.) press release, the winter forecast was expressed in probabilistic terms, (A: And what they told the public was…) with a 66% likelihood that the winter would be warmer than average (A: Here they are with the worst freezing snow in 20 years.) and a one in seven chance that it would be colder.
The Met Office has now admitted to BBC News that its annual global mean forecast predicted temperatures higher than actual temperatures for nine years out of the last 10. (A: 9 out of 10 wrong… [Alan laughing])
This "warming bias" is very small (A: This is their excuse.)- just 0.05C. And the Met Office points out that the variance between the forecast and the actual temperature is within its own stated margins of error. (A: So they can police themselves and pop it within its own margins of error.)
We live through incredible farces don’t we? That’s what I was saying about what do you pick to read on a show like this when there is so much farce out there, except more farce. Here’s another farce here. See, we’re getting steamrolled over, or railroaded I should really say. It’s railroaded and stampeded into crisis after crisis after crisis, all planned that way mind you, because we adapt quickly in crisis to any crazy change. Any new way of living, we adapt so fast… and they know this too from all their social engineering experts at the top. People have already forgotten that we’ve had a monetary crash supposedly and that they bailed out the banks with billions and billions, maybe trillions of dollars… across the world. They said it would make banking more honest and all the rest of that nonsense, at the time when they were dishing out the tax money to the banks. Well, this is the Sunday Times.
Wall Street giants pay staff $100bn (A: This is for bonuses.)
From The Sunday Times January 17, 2010 / Iain Dey
Four of Wall Street’s biggest banks will this week reveal plans to pay their staff a total of close to $100 billion (£62 billion), reigniting the row over bankers’ bonuses. (A: Well no kidding. Here’s the big boys too, the guys that started it all…)
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Bank of America Merrill Lynch are all expected to announce bumper pay awards for staff alongside full-year results.
Wall Street’s big payouts come as the remuneration committee at Royal Bank of Scotland prepares to meet this week to determine the size of its bonus pot.
RBS — 84%-owned by British (A: The British government, by the way.) taxpayers — has indicated it wants to pay its investment bankers about £1.5 billion in bonuses, even though it will make a loss this year at group level. The figure could creep higher if it attempts to shelter its bankers from the impact of Alistair Darling’s 50% tax on bonuses.
Lord Myners, the City minister, has called a meeting of global finance ministers and regulators in Downing Street this month to discuss other levies that could be introduced to prevent future crises. (A: Here they are dishing out $100 billion bucks or something to each other and meanwhile the government is meeting to get a bigger pot to STAVE off really, or cushion the NEXT future crisis. Isn’t there something stinking here? Something awfully rotten? Hmm? You know something, there are no laws to stop these guys from doing what they do. It’s the same when Rothschild’s conned the British people into the Bank of England take over by telling them that Napoleon had won. Nothing has been put in place to stop these sharks from ever doing this again. Nothing. Nope. No one goes to jail for it. You see, it’s legal robbery. They run the legal system too. This is called LEGAL ROBBERY. It’s their due… and we can’t say hoot about it.) George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, said this weekend he would support calls for a new global charge on banks.
America’s bonus payouts come days after President Barack Obama revealed plans for a windfall tax on banks in an effort to curb the “obscene” bonus culture.
Anger over the huge payments will be heightened by the fact that many of the banks are not profitable. (A: Here they are, they’re not profitable but they’re dishing out millions of bucks in bonuses to the top sharks.)
Of the four due to report figures this week only Goldman is expected to post a profit at the net income level, according to a consensus of analyst forecasts. The losses blow a hole in the argument that the bonuses represent pay for performance. (A: Well that’s for sure. [Alan laughing.])
However, all the banks are expected to show large gains in their investment banking divisions, which have been boosted by financial stimulus operations orchestrated by governments around the world. (A: And the tax payers paid for it all. Isn’t that just hunky-dory. It makes you feel better doesn’t it?)
As we’re being DEGRADED and we’re being dehumanized since 2001 with all the security checks and bend-overs and all the rest of it at airports, and now you get x-rayed and they can look through your clothing and have a good laugh at you. It is admitted now too that they can save that – it is saved – and they can transmit it wirelessly elsewhere. Here’s the next step of it and it’s being tested out in Holland. I’ve got two articles actually on it. This one is from Liberty Forest. The other one I have is from a Dutch newspaper – but it’s in Dutch – but it confirms it.
(Holland) Dutch police develop mobile body scans
Rotterdam police are trying to develop a portable scanner which will allow them to see through people's clothing and look for concealed weapons, (A: This is the excuse, for concealed weapons.) the NRC reports on Friday.
The force has been given a €500,000 government grant to develop the mobile weapons detector, which would use similar technology to the scanners being introduced at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport, the paper says.
The aim is to develop a prototype ready for production within three years.
The paper bases its claim on a confidential document which suggests the scanner could first be used as an alternative to random body searches in high risk areas. The mobile detector would enable the search to be carried out more quickly and would only be used on people suspected of carrying concealed weapons, (A: Well you know that’s a lie. It’s going to be used on streets of people as you pass by. That’s obvious.) police spokesman Paul De Kruijf told the paper.
The document also mentions the possibility of carrying out long-distance scans and mass scans on crowds at events such as football matches. (A: That’s soccer matches over there.) In addition, the scan (A: I call it scam…) could be combined with a sniffer detector which would analyse an 'air sample' from a suspect for traces of drugs or explosives, the paper says.
Giampiero Gerini, a professor at Eindhoven University of Technology told the paper the technology to develop such scans is now mature. 'The biggest challenge is making it portable and ensuring it can carry out a scan in seconds,' the NRC quotes him as saying.
What does it take for people to stand up and resist this?
You know what it takes folks? It would take them cutting off your electricity so you can’t watch TV or play games on the internet… and starvation, pretty well. That’s what it would take before you do anything. Unfortunately, the big boys know that too… they know that too. They’ve done study after study on uprisings and revolutions. They understand that you go to the wall before people retaliate and say enough is enough.
This article here is kind of related to what I mentioned earlier about the wonderful vegetarian society that MUST be brought in, apparently, by all the big players. All they’ll have access to, eventually for us, is the GMO food. Now, I don’t care what they’ve said about the GMO, you don’t mix hundreds of foreign genes together into a single organism… to produce a better carrot. You don’t put animal and insect and maybe even human genes in there as well… to get a better potato. There is something else here. They have admitted themselves that some of the top BIOWEAPON specialists worked on all these projects to do with food. BIOWEAPONS, what do you think bioweapons happens to be? Remember, the oldest and BEST drugs still around today COME FROM PLANTS. Plants can produce drugs. What do they want to have in the very near future? They want a very PASSIVE society… while they go through these massive changes.
Again, read the Technotronic Era; read Bertrand Russell’s various books on HOW they were going to drug and dumb down and keep happy the population, rather then have mass rioting going on. It’s through the food. They discussed the food. They also discussed injections. I’ve given the quotes many times on this particular show in fact, from the big players themselves. This article is Yahoo News. It’s also the Huffington Post.
Monsanto's GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals
Tue Jan 12 / Yahoo News
In a study released by the International Journal of Biological Sciences, analyzing the effects of genetically modified foods on mammalian health, researchers found that agricultural giant Monsanto's GM corn is linked to organ damage in rats.
According to the study, which was summarized by Adam Shake at Twilight Earth, "Three varieties of Monsanto's GM corn - Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup herbicide-absorbing NK 603 - were approved for consumption by US, European and several other national food safety authorities." (A: We’ve gone through the different agencies before and the people who are on the boards of them, they’ve all worked for Monsanto before. So Monsanto puts them IN to these agencies so that they can pass them.)
Monsanto gathered its own crude statistical data after conducting a 90-day study, even though chronic problems can rarely be found after 90 days, and concluded that the corn was safe for consumption. The stamp of approval may have been premature, however.
In the conclusion of the IJBS study, researchers wrote:
"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity.... (A: That’s your liver and kidneys.) These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown." (A: This doesn’t surprise me because after all, we were not living on pesticide-soaked foods before. This stuff is SOAKED, DOUSED in the heaviest of pesticides. Of course, you have to buy their particular Monsanto pesticide to go with the seeds when you buy the seeds. It kills everything else off except their particular plant. Well, guess what? The plants soak the stuff up as well, in its cellular structure and you are eating it. But that ties right in with the depopulation agenda as well, of course. There are all kinds of cancers that have broken out in the last 20-odd years and 30 years and getting higher all the time. And it’s NOT a crisis, so it’s planned that way. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, so much is presented to the public in a farcical manner – and I mean farcical. When you wake up you start to realize that most of the news is literally farcical the way it’s presented to us and we are never really told the big reasons why anything every really happens. We are given a truth that might be or a reason but never the real reason… never the real reason, never the real truth.
I’ve quoted some of the top players of the day, one by like Mandell House who advised, actually he RAN President Wilson’s administration behind the scenes. He said, for everything that happens in politics, there is always a good reason and then there is the real reason. So the good reason, the semi-plausible reason is always given to the public. Even if there is only 5 percent plausibility in their story, we’ll take that rather than go the whole way and say my God, what’s the real story? We don’t want the shock of the truth. Strange isn’t it, how we work as human beings. We really don’t want the shock of the truth. We don’t want to think that the world is a big cruel place out there, even when we’ve watched the machinations of teams of US, British and Canadian and other sources going out to torture people across the world on a war on terror, we’re told, and snatching folk at airports in their own countries and pulling them off to some other country where they can be tortured. This is the real world.
We know that they are trying to centralize all military actions WITH police across the Western hemisphere, actually all the way to Australia really. It’s worldwide, this whole regime, this world society that’s coming in. This article is from Global Research.
Obama Calls for the Integration of State and Federal Military Forces
Executive Order Seeks to "Synchronize and Integrate"
By Tom Burghardt / Global Research, January 17, 2010
In the wake of the Flight 253 provocation, over-hyped terrorism panics, and last year's Big Pharma and media-engineered hysteria over the H1N1 flu pandemic, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13528 on January 11. (A: I read that on the air last week but this is another take on it.)
Among other things, the Executive Order (EO) established a Council of Governors, an "advisory panel" chosen by the President that will rubber-stamp long-sought-after Pentagon contingency plans to seize control of state National Guard forces in the event of a "national emergency." (A: I talked last week about the CENTRALIZATION OF GOVERNMENT, a main plank of the Communist Manifesto. Think about that.)
According to the White House press release, the ten member, bipartisan Council was created "to strengthen further the partnership (A: Partnership… here we go. Why didn’t they use ‘harmonization,’ that’s a better word, right?) between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards."
"When appointed" the announcement continues, "the Council will be reviewing such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities."
Clearly designed to weaken the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 which bars the use of the military for civilian law enforcement, EO 13528 is the latest in a series of maneuvers by previous administrations to wrest control of armed forces (A: under a central command.) historically under the democratic control of elected state officials, and a modicum of public accountability.
You can see where it’s all going and you can see what’s coming by all the things that are happening right now. It’s not a pretty sight but you’ve got to stand up and fight it.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
US has Priority Military Role in Haiti
Google's Spat With China
UK Met Weather Office Wrong Again
Wall Street-100 Billion Dollars for Bankers' Bonuses
Dutch Police Trial Mobile X-Ray Scanners
Monsanto Corn and Organ Failure
US-Total Integration of Military for Home Use
Transcribed by Diana
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"