Jan. 13, 2010 (#491)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 13, 2010:
Pharma -- Marketing Technique to Make You Freak:
"A Veritable Mountain of Unused Vaccine
Left Over, Now Pharma's Licked Off the Cream
It Made from Injections, Anti-Viral Drugs
Which they Sold by Trainloads to Terrified Mugs,
Their Master-Strategists' Well-Planned Campaign
Drove Panic Buying, Made People Insane,
Killed Immunized Folks, Others Left Quadriplegic,
Huge Marketing Staff with Minds All Strategic,
Projected Deaths Down Millions, to 'Only a Few,'
With Conditioned Populace, Nothing They Can't Do"
© Alan Watt Jan. 13, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 13, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 13th 2010. For the newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site, scroll down the front page and have a look at all the other sites I have up there and bookmark them for future use because once in a while the big ones go down and that way you can always download the latest shows from the alternate sites. These are the only official sites I have and that are actually mine. There are copy ones out there too; sometimes you’ll see sites with my name on it but it’s not mine. The official sites are: [listed above].
I always start the show, rather than bother you most of the way through like most people do, with the tin can time. This is when I put out the tin can and I tell you that you are the only people who support me. The advertisers that pay for the show pay directly to RBN and I’ve got nothing to do with it. I don’t even communicate with the advertisers. That pays for the air time, the staff and the broadcasting on RBN. It pays for their board ops and their bills. So it’s up to YOU to keep me going here. Generally hosts take money from advertisers and they promote the advertisers, bring them on as guests and all that. I like to get on with the news or what’s really happening.
So it’s up to you to support me, you the audience, and you can do so by buying the books and CDs and DVDs that I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can also donate to me. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] For those of you who don’t use banks, you can use the international postal money order, from the US to Canada. It’s a prepaid money order and remember to STRESS international. Don’t come away with the green one; that’s the one that is safe inside the US. The pink communist one is for international and that gets to me. Canada is, believe you me, a very socialist, communist country. You can also send cash. That’s one thing the banks always do; they accept cash from everywhere. Mind you, they also take quite a whack of a fee but not as much as some of the big wire companies that wire the cash across. For those that get the disks burned by people with computers to people who don’t have computers who play them on their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].
As I say, it’s important that you keep me going because I could go the other way and bring lots of guests on that are really just advertisers that will terrify you and then they will push their product. That’s generally how it goes. A lot of them are very good and they are up on their fields but they DO want to sell, so I try to just stick to the basic news. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Some people have written to me that the show seems to be breaking on them and they can’t catch up. I don’t know if it’s a feed from RBN, and maybe an increase in bandwidth would do, I don’t know. It may be the ones on the highest speeds don’t get the same problems because they can buffer and perhaps they can catch up. I myself can’t download my own show. I’ve got problems also with XplorNet satellite company because I’m in a rural area. They punish me for using the satellite. They cut me back to the bottom speed even though I’m paying for high speed. Somebody gave them the nod, probably from the government, and they punish you basically. They have no competition; there’s nothing else in this area you can use. Yet I think too, maybe the bandwidth is a problem. People are finding that if they are on a medium speed they can generally download audios. I think a lot of folk go into the show and it starts cutting out the bandwidth and then you can’t catch up with the buffer; that’s a possibility. I get lots of email sent to me, but you have to tell RBN, because I really can’t do anything with it at this end.
Crisis… Crisis is the greatest trick of all tyrants down through history. It wasn’t an uncommon practice in ancient Rome for the Caesars to unleash the troops on their own citizens once in a while to keep them in line, to ‘protect’ them because there was some terrible thing going on, or could go on, or a possibility of going on, etc, etc. The same stuff as we have today. We’ve seen how, in the last century for instance, that the FEAR of the unknown basically was used to hype up various wars and it still is today. You can’t have a government going off to war without trying to come up with a least a plausible explanation to the public. There’s always a GOOD reason for what they do to the public and then there is always the REAL reason, which is always geopolitical and economical in nature and in long-term planning and strategy. Nothing happens by chance.
Governments do NOT go off to war on the nod of their leaders, at the drop of a hat, because they want to help some poor country that’s in a mess. We saw that with Rwanda when a small contingent of soldiers was there, led by a Canadian general, who were left in the lurch. They got no help given to them. They KNEW there was going to be a massive slaughter. France had paid, apparently, and trained and equipped the rebel forces, as they called them. This was all fed to the UN and the UN sat back and told the general to sit back and do nothing and lots of people were slaughtered. Financial reasons were behind it too. Never mind the massive coffee production that they do there. Lots of things go on that we are never told about – the real reasons – to go off to war. So they left that one alone. It wasn’t worth too much money to them. They will go into Yemen because they want to put pipelines all over the place, all through there, and that’s the reason they’re going into Yemen. It’s the same with Afghanistan and in geopolitical terms; it’s essential that they have that all under their thumb, the big boys, the big powers, so they can get all their oil pipelines going through. They will bribe who they have to bribe because the ones at the top are used to bribery; that’s how their ancestors got up there. That’s the world we live in. That’s the REAL world that we live in; we are never given real reasons.
Since 2001, we’ve had pretty well every right stripped from us. Lots more… well, there’s not many left to go, but lots of rights have been stripped from the average person under the guise of keeping you safe, the oldest, OLDEST trick. As I say, it’s THOUSANDS of years old; it’s the oldest trick in the book. There’s no end to keeping us safe. Literally, if you were to go by the mandate of the police psychology and all the lectures they get, if they’re going to prevent crime they would literally have to lobotomize us all and chain us all to the chair, then they would know where we were at all times. They’re doing it in another way. They’re doing it by using computerization and cell phones and tracking and all the rest of it to make sure they know where everyone is at all times and it’s to go much, much further until it’s mandatory with your ID card, as it already is in some countries in Europe. You’ve got to have your ID card with you in Holland and different countries even to get on a bus or a taxi or on a subway. They can track you with all of this, you see.
Never believe the PLAUSIBLE nonsense that the government dishes out to the press that then reiterate it and put it across to you. You’ve got to think for yourself, read your history as Aldous Huxley said. The most important thing in the world is history because you will see these patterns being used over and over again. In good historical books they will tell you… it’s okay to tell you what happened in the past 100, 200, 300 years ago, 500 or 1000 years ago because those people are all dead now and they accomplished what they wanted under the guise of crisis. They don’t tell you about the recent things. That’s up to you to have a memory and think for yourself and check into things. It’s the only way you’ll know what’s going on.
It’s no different from this whole world amalgamation stuff that we are going through since 2001. They stepped it up. They used that not just as the excuse, I think they did it themselves to bring it on; they simply did nothing to prevent it. Since then we’ve had crisis after crisis. We’ve had more crises in the last few years then they have in the last 100 years and all of course unforeseen. It’s all bogus. All bogus. When they tested out the Y2K nonsense back in the year 2000, you’ll notice a technique that’s used by the press. Every media, every television media would go around to the ‘man and the women in the street’ and they would say to them, do you BELIEVE in Y2K and that all things will come to an end because all the computers are going to stop? They didn’t say, what do you think of this? Or what’s your opinion? It was, do you BELIEVE… so it’s a faith based thing. They will always do that with a CON. I don’t know if it’s a legality that they have but they will always give you that little clue. Of course it was a big con and billions of dollars were spent by governments on computers who found out that once the clock turned after midnight that nothing crashed and the old ones that hadn’t been updated were okay as well. It was one of these cons. Then we had 2001 and the so-called terrorist attack. Then we’ve got the war OF terror on the world and the public as they strip our rights away until we’re doing ridiculous things at airports and elsewhere. Police are strutting around like the military, which they actually are now. We’ve had the banking collapse of course. We had the avian flu that flew away in some other direction, out into outer space, which was going to kill millions of us. Then we had the swine flu and that’s when pigs might fly and that flew away as well. I said that it would; as soon as the press stopped talking about it, it would fly away. Then the financial crisis took over. They stopped talking about it and boom, it disappeared because it wasn’t really there.
This goes on and on and on. I can remember years ago listening to some politicians as they were prattling on about another great scam. Of course these politicians all get BIG lobbying money given to them by the lobbyists for technology, etc. They wanted to put massive radars and satellites into space to detect incoming asteroids. Oh, fear of asteroids are going to smash us all to pieces. That was one of the big cons as well. They’ve actually got projects on that right now and the politicians that promote that got awfully well paid from the technological companies that are selling their stuff. The greatest thing to sell anything is CRISIS. Crisis, crisis, crisis, it’s never ending.
It never will be ending either because they can wheel out as many paid experts as they want. You would not believe how many PROSTITUTES are up near the top, especially in science because if you can’t get your name in the history books of science, you’re nobody. You don’t get grants and they LIVE on grants. Scientists ALL live on grants. To be honest with you too, if they go and work with the military-industrial complex to make killer diseases, THEY WILL DO IT. There are no qualms there. There are no moral qualms whatsoever. They put it down to well, it’s research for science and we have nothing to do with morality or politics. That’s how they rationalize it to themselves… to get these big fat paychecks.
It’s the same with the weather nonsense and the fiascos with that, that’s going on right now. You’ve probably all heard about the solar shield. This just hit the papers. There’s nothing new in it but there’s time to roll out this one to see if we’ll swallow that too and pay for all this nonsense. Before I go through this article which is from the Telegraph, we’ve been getting sprayed by aircraft since about 1998. In 1998 they stared doing it frequently across Canada. They tested it out in the US and different places and Canada and Britain SINCE THE 1950s, different sprays on the public, partly for warfare purposes which they DID admit in declassified information later on. They can also use the technique that, I think it was Teller who it put forth, the inventor of the H-bomb who worked for the Pentagon. He wanted to put all this stuff into the atmosphere like a big shield of metallic particles substances NOT to stop sunlight but so that they could use the HAARP technology, HAARP EMP [electromagnetic pulse] technology and literally put electronic signals across a much more electrified or conductive atmosphere. That’s the same thing that Brzezinski talked about in his book Between Two Ages, the chapter The Technotronic Era, where they could use this across WHOLE CONTINENTS and alter their behavior, their thinking, and so on. So it’s not a new idea but they’ve been doing it.
Here they go, and before I mention this article, go and see Highlander 2 the movie. It’s IN the movie. It was done years ago, the solar shield and even that was a con in the movie, as you would see. Back with more after this break.
I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking about the solar shield nonsense that’s coming up now, a big money maker for all the big high-tech boys and the big usual corporations that are involved in the military-industrial complex. Back in the 50s they said themselves of the changing face of war that eventually they’d have to go into security for home and all that stuff. That’s what they’ve been doing for an awful long time.
The Highlander 2 movie had the solar shield in it. At that time the hype and hype and hype from the UN and NASA, another part of the military-industrial complex, was the ozone hole. The hole in the ozone layer that ONLY NASA could detect with their special high flying aircraft, no one else had the equipment so you took their word for it. Even if there was a hole there, near the North Pole or the South Pole, maybe it’s normal. I mean, if you just find something, discover it, has it ever occurred that it might be normal? Of course that was never mentioned. The whole idea was to terrify you and terrify you and that was it. Well that’s the reason they did it in the actual movie Highlander 2. It says here in this article from the Telegraph…
Solar shield on agenda at climate summit
(Alan: The climate summit is a farce in itself. All the leaked emails, we know all that’s an utter con, crisis creation and domination of the public for political and sociological reasons because they want to vastly reduce the population and get us all on rationing, the way that good Fascists love to do it.)
Emergency measures to slow global warming, such as a ‘solar shield’ to block the sun or artificial trees to soak up CO2, will be discussed at a ‘geo-engineering’ conference.
By Alastair Jamieson / 13 Jan 2010 / The Telegraph
(A: Remember the IPCC at the United Nations, most of them aren’t even so-called experts at all. They’re all communists up there, but they’re well paid communists, well paid by the big businesses. I read that article last night about all the corruption within the United Nations. They won’t even investigate themselves anymore as billions of dollars just go missing routinely.)
One proposal is for a fleet of ships that would spray seawater into the sky that would leave behind salt crystals to brighten clouds. Photo: NASA. (A: NASA’s idea.)
The summit of climate scientists, to be held in California in March, will examine drastic techniques for slowing climate change that are controversial and have been described as “geo-piracy”. (A: Have you seen the satellite photographs of Britain and parts of Europe that are utterly frozen and at a standstill? Have you seen it? It doesn’t matter, as I said, if Jesus Christ himself came down, or Buddha or whoever else came down here, they’d still deny it and carry on with the agenda. They dreamed up this agenda an awful long time ago and they don’t change their plans; they never change their plans.)
Among the possible measures to be discussed will be ocean fertilisation, which would see iron dumped into the sea to boost plankton growth (A: That was tried donkey’s years ago in experiments and even in labs.), and artificial trees that use a chemical process to soak up CO2. (A: Like CO2 is the problem. CO2 follows climate change. It follows it. It doesn’t cause it. It’s caused by the sun, either sunspots or lack of them.)
Most techniques focus on ways of reducing the sun’s rays by blocking them using mirrors orbiting in space (A: That was discussed by the Soviets back in the 50s, if you go look into the old magazines of the time. They were going to use it also so they could get people working night and day; they would reflect sun down to all the darkened parts for all the robots here, right.) or by spraying sulphur compounds into the high atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from earth.
One proposal is for a fleet of ships that would spray seawater into the sky that would leave behind salt crystals to brighten clouds, reflecting more sunlight back into space.
The conference, reported in The Guardian, comes amid concern that such techniques may be the only way to prevent average temperatures rising. (A: Which it hasn’t been anyway.)
Mike MacCracken, a global warming expert (A: He’s an EXPERT.) at the Climate Institute in Washington DC (A: Who makes his living on all this nonsense.), who is organising the conference's scientific programme, told the newspaper: "Most of the talk about these geo-engineering techniques say they should be saved until we get to an emergency situation. Well, the people of the Arctic might say they are in an emergency situation now." (A: We’ve read all the articles on this particular show of the fact that the ice is thickening over the last few years now in the Arctic, the same in the Antarctic as well. They tell you nothing but rotten lies over and over and over, even when these characters are exposed by their cons and even in their emails. That’s how the world is run, by lies.)
Scientists at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs say the techniques should not be ruled out but that more evidence from experiments is required. (A: Well, they’ll get all their grants for that.)
The Swedish Society for Nature Conservation recently described geo-engineering an act of "geo-piracy" and warned that the "the world runs a serious risk of choosing solutions that turn out to be new global problems". (A: Have you any idea of the folk that are already killed off, since they were spraying heavily since 1998? That’s when every pharmacist will tell you that antibiotics skyrocketed… bronchial problems, people couldn’t get rid of it… children, elderly, all age groups. People get asthma now in their 40s and 50s; it never happened before and now it’s common, since 1998, a common diagnosis… because we are breathing this crap IN and they KNOW it at the top. But they’d rather let it… see, it solves a lot of problems. It kills a lot of people off, depopulation, as they also tax all the rest, the survivors, into poverty for all these con games. As I say, the military-industrial complex NEEDS alternate ways of making cash, especially as we get closer and closer to a truly global society where there will be no nations to fight each other. Again, that was thought up by think tanks back in the 50s.)
However, some geo-engineering techniques are already being used on a large scale. (A: No kidding.) The Chinese government is thought to use cloud-seeding on a regular basis to encourage precipitation in areas hit by drought. (A: This Chinese stuff is actually antique stuff but they don’t go on about what’s been happening over the Americas, Europe, Sweden, Denmark and everywhere else for years. Back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Just to mention too, that the articles I read in the past as well, about the possibility of eventually spraying the skies with all this stuff, which they’ve already been doing for 11 years now could have terrible repercussions on the health of the public. Well, no kidding. How do they know that? Because they are monitoring the health of the public and have been as they’ve been spraying us for 11 years; that’s why.
Crisis creation, crisis creation… again, here’s a good write-up on crisis creation and it’s from the Mail Online.
After this awful fiasco over swine flu, we should never believe the State scare machine again
By Christopher Booker / 12th January 2010 / The Mail Online
So the Government, as the Daily Mail has revealed, is trying to get rid of £1billion-worth (A: That’s about 2 or more billion dollars.) of unwanted swine flu vaccine (A: So is Canada.) - because the deadly epidemic they were promising us all last year never materialised.
Several things are shocking about this revelation, not least the charge by the Council of Europe's head of health that major drug companies might have leaned on the World Health Organisation (WHO) (A: It didn’t just lean, they spilled a lot out of their pockets towards the World Health Organization.) to stoke up last year's scare by warning that swine flu could be a worldwide 'pandemic' killing tens of millions. (A: Remember? Remember… we forget so quickly as we rush into the next crisis that’s fake as well.)
Certainly, those companies have made vast fortunes (A: Have they ever.) out of selling the vaccines which, at our expense, are now having to be flogged off at give-away prices.
But in a way most shocking of all is that this scandalous waste of public money - and the wild over-reaction which gave rise to it - was entirely predictable.
I can say this with confidence because I predicted it on this very page of the Daily Mail in April last year, just when our government, led by the Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson, was cranking up the scare-machine to fever pitch by predicting that swine flu could be as bad as the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 which killed 50 million people worldwide.
Even then it was clear that governments all over the world, led by the WHO (A: AT the United Nations.), were in the grip of a hysterical panic over swine flu.
Our own government was holding emergency meetings in its 'crisis bunker' (A: That’s the underground bunker.) off Whitehall. (A: In London.)
The BBC Today programme wheeled on a WHO 'expert' to predict that 40 per cent of Britons would catch swine flu, while citing another unnamed 'expert' as predicting that up to 1.2 million of us could die.
A similar panic had seized politicians in America, when just one child died after a family holiday in Mexico (A: One child.) - even though this compared with (A: And they give the wrong statistics because I read the article too that you never get 36,000 people dying a year. They always say the same thing when they’re trying to flog the flu shot.) the 36,000 Americans who die each year from more conventional strains of flu.
Yet eight months later it was being reported by scientists that swine flue is only a tenth as virulent as ordinary flu (A: It’s milder than ordinary flu. Most folk don’t know they’ve even had it.), and only one-100th as virulent as that Spanish flu at the end of World War I.
In other words, swine flu - just like the bird flu which we were told by a senior WHO (A: At the United Nations.) official in 2005 was going to kill 150 million people worldwide (the true death toll turned out to be barely 200 (A: And that was all in areas, as I’ve said before, that traditionally drink the blood of the chicken before you cook it.)) - has predictably turned out to be yet another example of that all-too-familiar and very dangerous disease of our time, the 'scare phenomenon'.
Three years ago, with a food safety expert, Dr Richard North, I wrote a book called Scared To Death, a detailed study showing how scare after scare in the past 20 years has rocketed through the headlines, costing us all billions, before it was eventually revealed that they had been blown up out of all proportion and, in many cases, had no real justification at all.
Based on years of research, we traced the history of a whole sequence of such panics, ranging from those over salmonella in eggs (A: Remember that one? Oh, you can’t eat eggs now, there’s salmonella in it.) and BSE in beef to the Millennium Bug that was supposedly going to bring civilisation to a halt at midnight on December 31, 1999, as half the world's computers (A: …were supposed to…) crashed.
That particular panic cost an estimated $300billion (A: The Y2K nonsense.) before it was discovered that the countries which hadn't spent fortunes on sorting out their computers fared no worse than those that had.
The purpose of our book was to show how consistently these scares follow an identifiable pattern.
They invariably begin with some misreading of the scientific evidence (A: On purpose, I would add to that.), which then gets picked up and inflated into some major threat to human health or well being.
But the tipping point of any scare, the moment when it begins to create serious damage, is when politicians and governments get involved, buying the exaggerated threat (A: They are more than buying, they get their pockets filled.) wholesale and responding with a deluge of measures which end up costing us all billions of pounds.
Do you remember our health minister Edwina Currie in 1988 setting off that panic over salmonella in eggs, which was supposedly going to kill thousands of people because the bacteria were somehow getting inside the eggs they ate for breakfast?
Few headlines greeted the government's admission four years later that salmonella was not getting inside eggs after all and that whatever else had caused a temporary rise in salmonella poisoning, it wasn't eggs.
But by then the damage was done and more than 5,000 small egg producers had been driven out of business. (A: The same thing happened with the stuff with the H1N1. Chickens carry this stuff; it’s been here for millions of years with them. They killed off millions of hens across Canada, in British Columbia especially, over this panic nonsense. Have you ever wondered why they are going for the food supply? At first they went for the fish; oh, there is mercury in it; can’t eat the fish. The PROTEIN SUPPLY. Then the BSE, remember the bovine problem they were going to have, the brain eating disease, the spongiform encephalitis they called it. That was nonsense as well, after they destroyed the WHOLE CATTLE INDUSTRY; pigs, everything, went up in pyramids of smoke, the most horrific thing. Then they went after the eggs. It’s all PROTEIN folks. They’re bringing in a greenie, vegetarian world, where you’re going to eat Monsanto’s poisonous, noxious stuff and you’ll be much dumber than you are now, believe you me.)
In 1996, when the greatest food scare of all exploded over BSE (A: That’s the mad cow disease.), front-page headlines greeted the suggestion by the government's chief scientist John Pattison that the death toll from CJD (A: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.) caught by eating beef could within a few years reach 500,000.
A year later, scarcely any attention at all was paid to Dr Pattison's confession that he had now revised his figure downwards to just (A: maybe…) '100'.
But by this time a flood of government and EU regulations were costing us all an estimated £7billion.
Again and again we have seen this pattern repeating itself, from SARS (A: That was such a fiasco.) and dioxins to the confusion between different types of asbestos, costing more than £100billion in lawsuits alone - and the one lesson which comes out from them all, loud and clear, is that our modern world has become far too prone to getting these supposed threats out of all proportion. (A: It’s amazing. You know we get all these businesses profiting incredibly from it. It’s the greatest trick in the book. Terrify the public, you’re all going to die, but here’s the antidote; we just happen to sell it; it will be in short supply so it’s going to be awfully expensive. Over and over and over again.)
Exactly as I predicted last April, the panic over swine flu has provided yet another very expensive example of the pattern, showing features all too familiar from all those other scares which have already run their absurdly damaging and unnecessary course.
Of course, governments must be prepared to meet any genuine threat to our health and well-being.
But as history painfully shows, we have become far too quick to over-react to dangers which too often turn out either to have been wildly exaggerated or never to have existed at all.
The real problem is that too many people have a vested interest in talking up these panics beyond what the evidence can support.
It’s not just the economic sector. Definitely they are right up there but there is also a sociological and political agenda behind this as well folks… as they bring you in to their socialized society. Rationing WILL come and mandatory sterilization WILL come with these fanatics at the top. You could go on and on and on about the farce that we think is reality, which most folk take as reality. The farce, you could go on and on and on and on. They’ve no sooner got one panic over then they get you with another one. This is a technique that’s being used against the world, especially at this day and age, this particular time, to give more power to the United Nations and all its departments, like the World Health Organization, as they rise up to be the world government that it was intended to be in the first place.
From Raw Story…
Obama received $20 million from healthcare industry in 2008 campaign
(A: That’s like big pharma and stuff… $20 million. Of course that doesn’t influence anything folks. It doesn’t either give you the clue that all this farce we’ve been through recently was planned a while ago. Could it be? Oh, no, that would be stretching credulity wouldn’t it?)
By Brad Jacobson / Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
While some sunlight has been shed on the hefty sums shoveled into congressional campaign coffers in an effort to influence the Democrats' massive healthcare bill, little attention has been focused on the far larger sums received by President Barack Obama while he was a candidate in 2008.
A new figure, based on an exclusive analysis created for Raw Story by the Center for Responsive Politics, shows that President Obama received a staggering $20,175,303 from the healthcare industry during the 2008 election cycle, nearly three times the amount of his presidential rival John McCain. McCain took in $7,758,289, the Center found.
The new figure, obtained by Raw Story through an independent custom research request performed by the Center for Responsive Politics -- a nonprofit, nonpartisan group that tracks money in politics -- is the most comprehensive breakdown yet available of healthcare industry contributions to Obama during the 2008 election cycle.
Currently, the Center's website shows that Obama received $19,462,986 from the health sector, which includes health professionals ($11.7m), health services/HMOs ($1.4m), hospitals/nursing homes ($3.3m) (A: Which are big business.) and pharmaceuticals/health products ($2.1m). Miscellaneous health donations (from which Obama received $860,411) are also factored into the current total health sector numbers but are not accessible on the site.
Health insurance industry contributions, however, are not included within the Center's current health sector totals. Rather, contributions from the health insurance industry are contained within the site's finance and insurance sector. Seeking a more complete total, the Center culled health and accident insurance donations from this sector (for which Obama received $712,317) and combined them with his existing health sector total ($19,462,986) to arrive at his healthcare industry total ($20,175,303). (A: Of course this was… there’s no string attached, you understand, in politics. I mean, no, no, no, there are no strings ever attached to anything. It’s just, well, you know, if I get in, if you do something wrong, I might not go along with you; I’ve got be up front about that. I’m sure that’s said VERY frequently by all politicians. What a farce we live in. What an utter, utter farce we live in. They call this living.)
The thing is too, why is it up to a site like the Raw Story? Why isn’t in the major media coming out with all this stuff? Well they don’t want you to know. Who do you think they major media works for? Do you know the ads that THEY get from pharma and health and all the rest of it? Media is an ESSENTIAL ARM OF GOVERNMENT because they give to YOU what becomes most peoples’ reality. Perception becomes reality for most people.
I was talking to someone in a hospital in New York last night and guess what? They’re already implementing this health care plan. It wasn’t Obama’s idea. Hillary tried to get that through years ago. It was on the agenda obviously. It really is to bring in the bare-bones health care like Britain’s got or Canada where you die before you can get an x-ray, maybe wait 2 or 3 years for something. Mind you, if you want to be sterilized they will do it very quickly; in you go, poom, done… it cuts the population. This particular person in New York, they just closed down the whole surgical floor of the hospital and they’re leasing it out to, what they call a “hospice,” an exit home where you die off. They withdraw your food and your water and if you are lucky and you bribe somebody in the right place they might change the bed linen once in a while as you die off. That’s what they’re doing now. They’re already implementing it. Now there will be a few high-tech hospitals left, very, very ultra expensive, but the rest, we can’t afford to get into but the big boys will. They will make sure that will happen.
Remember, the World Health Organization in its own charter says that they guarantee the most basic, BASIC health care to every citizen of the world. Remember, being a SOCIALIST organization, they are EUGENICALLY MINDED. They believe in a high-class system. They don’t like to use the word ‘class.’ It’s your NECESSITY TO SOCIETY they like to call it. Necessity to society, are you UP there or DOWN there? That’s how YOU are LABELED. In Britain, and they’ve had this since about the 80s, that little checklist at the bottom of your bed there, the board with all your little details on it, they mark you down in categories, A, B, C, and so on, about who’s to be resuscitated and who is not to be resuscitated. If two guys in a cardiac ward both go into arrest at the same time, they look at the board and it will tell you which one to try and resuscitate and which one to let go according to their status and their value to society. THAT’S SOCIAL HEALTH CARE.
If folk haven’t noticed the totalitarian system we are IN and I don’t know how they can’t notice it, with police wearing combat boots, all given to them BEFORE 9/11 happened. See, everything works and is set up in advance. Now the cops are arresting folk that use their cell phone photography who record the cops arresting folk. Back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix talking about don’t, whatever you do, photograph police arresting people or even interviewing people because you’ll get arrested for doing so. It’s been going on for years. This is one instance that happened about 2 or 3 years ago.
Police fight cellphone recordings
Witnesses taking audio of officers arrested, charged with illegal surveillance
Daniel Rowinski, New England Center For Investigative Reporting | January 12, 2010 / The Boston Globe
Simon Glik, a lawyer, was walking down Tremont Street in Boston when he saw three police officers struggling to extract a plastic bag from a teenager’s mouth. Thinking their force seemed excessive for a drug arrest, Glik pulled out his cellphone and began recording.
Within minutes, Glik said, he was in handcuffs.
“One of the officers asked me whether my phone had audio recording capabilities,’’ Glik, 33, said recently of the incident, which took place in October 2007. Glik acknowledged that it did, and then, he said, “my phone was seized, and I was arrested.’’
The charge? Illegal electronic surveillance. (A: It’s illegal to photograph police.)
Jon Surmacz, 34, experienced a similar situation. Thinking that Boston police officers were unnecessarily rough while breaking up a holiday party in Brighton he was attending in December 2008, he took out his cellphone and began recording.
Police confronted Surmacz, a webmaster at Boston University. He was arrested and, like Glik, charged with illegal surveillance.
There are no hard statistics for video recording arrests. But the experiences of Surmacz and Glik highlight what civil libertarians call a troubling misuse of the state’s wiretapping law to stifle the kind of street-level oversight that cellphone and video technology make possible.
“The police apparently do not want witnesses to what they do in public,’’ said Sarah Wunsch, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, who helped to get the criminal charges against Surmacz dismissed.
Boston police spokeswoman (A: That’s public relations or management perception, if you don’t know.) Elaine Driscoll rejected the notion that police are abusing the law to block citizen oversight, saying the department trains officers about the wiretap law. “If an individual is inappropriately interfering with an arrest that could cause harm to an officer or another individual, an officer’s primary responsibility is to ensure the safety of the situation,’’ she said. (A: Right. So you could be photographing the cops, you could be 100 yards away, but are interfering with the arrest and putting the officers’ lives at risk, you see. Utter rubbish. MANAGEMENT PERCEPTION. That’s what they do. They take something that’s really happening and warp it around to alter your perception of something.)
In 1968, Massachusetts became a “two-party’’ consent state, one of 12 currently in the country. Two-party consent means that all parties to a conversation must agree to be recorded on a telephone or other audio device; otherwise, the recording of conversation is illegal. (A: So they’re using this.) The law, intended to protect the privacy rights of individuals, appears to have been triggered by a series of high-profile cases involving private detectives who were recording people without their consent.
In arresting people such as Glik and Surmacz, police are saying that they have not consented to being recorded, that their privacy rights have therefore been violated, and that the citizen action was criminal. (A: These are cops talking. THEIR privacy rights have been violated. They’re supposed to be working FOR the public, aren’t they? The only watchdog there is, happens to BE the public.)
I wonder how long it will be in this world police state before they take reprisals when something happens and they can’t find the culprit and just grab a dozen of us off the street and shoot us. Do you think I’m kidding?
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Solar Shield Discussed at Summit
Government to dispose of 1 Billion Pound's Worth of Flu Vaccine
Obama got 20,000,000 Dollars from Health Industry for Campaign
Police Arrest People Video Recording Arrests
Transcribed by Diana
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"