Dec. 21, 2009 (#476)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 21, 2009:
Copenhagen Stewardship Tribute -- Scoot with the Loot:
"Global Warming Advocates Coughing and
As Europe Experiences Very Deep Freezing,
At Copenhagen, Sharks Bicker and Barter
Our Rights Away, Under 'Stewardship' Charter,
With Slick Terminology about Third-World Health,
Western Third-World to Redistribute Wealth,
As per Communist Manifesto, Destroy Middle Class,
Replaced by Bureaucracy which will Raise the Glass
To World Master who'll Feed and Pay Them Well
For Subjugating Proles who'll Live in Hell"
© Alan Watt Dec. 21, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 21, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December 21st 2009. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. That is the main web site. Scroll down, bookmark the other sties I have up there because sometimes the big ones get pulled and I have to spend 2 or 3 weeks reloading them back up again. If you have these other sties bookmarked you can get the latest shows downloaded when this happens and it will happen again. Remember, these are the official sites. [Listed above.]
Remember, you are the listeners, you are the audience, and you bring me to you 5 nights a week. I’m not backed by a foundation. I’m not backed by any corporation selling anything. The ads on this show that you hear are paid by the advertisers right to RBN. I’ve got nothing to do with it. That pays for the air time. It pays for their staff and their equipment and their bills. So it’s up to you to keep me going and you can do so by buying the books and disks I have for sale on the web site. [Ordering and donation options listed above.] In the US, you can use personal check or INTERNATIONAL postal money order, from the post office. You’ve got to stress international to them. It’s a kind of orangey/pinkish color check that they give you. Not the green one; the green one is internal only. Pink is obviously for international; we’re all communist now. So you can use the pink one to send to Canada. You can also buy the books through PayPal; just send a separate email to me along with the PayPal donation. Some people just send cash and that cuts out the podgy guy with the triple chins; sometimes they have more after the last bail out and he’s got a $5,000 suit on. It’s up to you how you want to do it. That keeps me going. For those who get the disks burned and passed to them at meetings, don’t use computers, you can write to me at [address above]. And that’s that out of the way for the moment, but it’s really important you keep me going. Everyone expects everyone else to do it and of course nothing happens then. That’s the way of human nature.
I keep saying we are the generation that doesn’t have to guess what the future holds. Previous generations especially up into the early 1900s had to guess what was planned by the big, big powerful movements that were writhing in a cauldron basically, all competing with each other for a world order. We don’t appreciate that, how huge these big organizations were. Many of them were revolutionary in nature, funded of course by the big banking boys because that’s how you get change and apparently change is good. They were fomenting revolutions across the world to bring in a standardized world. Lots of ordinary people would join. You know the masses would always join and they needed the masses to get the new system in, thinking it was a good thing. If you were part of the masses then you might have joined yourself. I’ll go on with that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just mentioning how you have to understand the big, massive, well coordinated movements of the 1800s that were across the world, all through Europe mainly and that’s where they were fomenting all the revolutions to do with Marxist ideas. There were anarchists tied in there, different branches and so on. You find common threads through them all. They had vaguely an idea, at least at the bottom ranks, where they were going. The bottom ranks always get a different version from the ones at the top, the ones who are doing the organizing, but it’s good enough for the ordinary people. That’s how it seems to be down through history; they helped bring in revolutions across the world. Even then, at that time, they were talking about a world society, ideas that came out of the minds of various theorists and even scientists and even some churchmen as well. They came forward talking about the inevitable globalization of the world under some sort of wonderful utopic system.
Of course, we’ve never had utopia. Utopias don’t happen on earth. It can only be utopic for a few at the top and indeed even in the past it’s been like that. Look at the standard of living the pharaohs and the nobility had thousands of years ago. Incredible… lots of parties too. They drank beer all the time; that was the national drink. However, for the ordinary people of course, it was a different kettle of fish. They were lucky to get any fish at all. In fact, they weren’t even allowed to eat the pharaoh’s meat, the cattle. You could get the occasional fowl here and there but they weren’t allowed to eat beef because you never allow the public or the people who are working for you, the slave population, to have a high-protein diet and lots of minerals and things that they need. You want to keep them pretty dumb and stupid but just healthy enough to do their work. these sciences were understood thousands of years ago.
Back to these revolutions... The revolutions never stopped throughout the 20th century even. Indeed, the world wars were all part of it to bring in a global society. You cannot have big players writing books about bringing in a world society and the need to bring in a world society, with the whole doctrine of how it would be run, you can’t have that published before a world war… especially when you say IN your books you need a world war to make it happen. And BINGO you get your wish. If that was the case, we could all make wishes for a future society and they would all come true, like the movies, but that’s not how it happens. It takes big money, coordination, incredible organization, to pull off these agendas. The big players published the fact they would need great catastrophes to bring in a world society including wars, maybe a giant conflict. They got World War I and out of that they got the League of Nations. It was meant to bring the world to their knees with the war and the League of Nations was going to end up as the savior and distributing the wealth of the world across the world supposedly, from the bankers from these countries to their cousins in the other countries. That’s how the distribution of wealth goes.
They also needed a second world war and that wasn’t enough. Big players who attended these meetings - attended the Fabian Societies for instance - wrote about it and the NEED for a World War II to end sovereignty all together. Many others did as well. In fact, I have books here written during World War II of many of the big players involved in the think tanks of their day and the intelligence services, the national intelligence services of their day, printing books during World War II with the whole end of World War II laid out. Some of the books were written in 1942, some 1943, but they said they’d eventually carve Berlin up and keep it apart for maybe 70 years if need be, until a whole generation grew up on one side never knowing the history, the full history of themselves, their past or the full history of the other. These people worked in the US government that printed these books. Everything is planned ahead.
The whole divvying up of Europe into the communist societies - the blocs, the blocs that ended up being part of the Soviet Union - it was all decided at the Yalta Conferences. Whole countries were given away. It’s sort of a chess board NOT between competitors. The chess board has always been from those who rule to the rest of the population to keep you blinded basically as to where they are going, or the whys. It’s so convoluted often at times you don’t know who are the good guys and who are the bad guys until you eventually understand they are all the same, that this is the same club that runs the world. Conflict, remember, is how you bring change. When you plan the conflict, and you plan the opposition to the conflict and you plan the outcome, it’s the outcome that you’re after all along. That’s how the world has always been run, at least for the last 500 years I’d say, maybe longer.
The strategies of war of course are ancient, going back thousands of years but the actual techniques of getting masses of people to do something for your bidding, for your cause, thinking they are fighting for another cause, is pretty spectacular. That really came out into a fine art in the late 1800s. A small minority can dominate whole nations by promoting freedom and the end of poverty, that kind of stuff. It doesn’t take many to do it. They say all the right things, they stir up the obvious injustices, but they have a completely different goal at the top than the one they are promoting to the public. Nothing has changed with that.
It’s the same with this global warming scam. There is so much documentation out there on the planning of catastrophes; at one time the same people, the SAME people at the United Nations were promoting the coming ice age. It was in all the big magazines of its day; all the scientific reports from experts telling us we’d had it and we were going into global freezing. They even talked about scattering thousands and millions of tons of soot on the North Pole, to try to warm up the North Pole, to stop global freezing. No kidding; that was back in the 70s. Of course the weather didn’t go along with them so they had to change it. It’s so beautiful, so Orwellian, how they can change in mid-stride into a completely opposite theory and promote that as though it had always been the theory. That’s a technique that Orwell describes in 1984. But they did it.
It’s all a con again to bring us into this great world SOCIALIST system where a tiny minority will rule over the entire planet and live like kings and queens have never lived in the past - at the highest level of technological achievement and medicine and wealth - as you never imagine. The rest will all be tiered down like a pyramid system, a massive bureaucracy in the middle and all the masses at the bottom run in a communistic fashion of social necessity. That means, under social necessity – the UN has all this stuff in their charters – you won’t get born unless they need you to SERVE their system. I’m not kidding about that either. We get so used to something… I’ve given the instance before where a bunch of wild boars escaped in a state in the US. They tried everything to catch these wild boars, nothing worked. Eventually they got one guy in who said I can do it, but I will need maybe a month. They said okay. He drove his half-ton truck up with various grains in it and hay and all the rest of it and greens that these things loved, and dumped it off. He drove to the horizon and watched them at a distance. Then he did the same thing the next day. He kept doing this until he could stay closer and closer to them. They got used to seeing him and they lost all fear because he was familiar to them, just like the UN is familiar to us and we take it all for granted now, even though it’s a foreign entity. In fact it’s a strange entity; it’s not even a country. It’s a PRIVATE organization. Eventually, he started putting stakes around them. He’d drop the stuff off and put a few more stakes in every day. He fenced them in on the last time; just fenced them in. He would leave them an exit and on the very last day he just put the last part of the fence in and there they were. That’s how you do it, incrementalism and familiarity. This seems to represent to danger now, it hasn’t harmed us yet, so it’s alright… you see.
That exactly how the United Nations has been set up. We’ve all been accustomed to the name, the term, through little bits that came out of the news over many, many years. We’ve even been given all the charity stuff like soldiers handing out chocolates to children; that kind of PR stuff that they’ve been doing since World War II. It’s pure PR. Many people think that’s what the UN is all about, soldiers going out to hand food out. No kidding. PR can be wonderful. When a soldier goes off to a country and he is armed to the teeth, with grenades and flack jackets and machine guns, he is a soldier. You cannot call him a ‘peace-keeper.’ He is a soldier. He is trained to go over there and kill and achieve objective by killing, not to hand out chocolate to little children. Double-speak, double-think, everything is hidden by terminology changes. It’s so simple to change the idea or the perception by changing the terminology. It’s like ‘war is peace,’ ‘freedom is slavery,’ all these terms that Orwell used. They’re going to keep the ‘peace’… If you want someone to keep the peace, you send in the Salvation Army and white flags - that’s what you send in - and they can hand out hot soup or something. I’ll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I like to touch on a little bit of the events which have lead up to the present to show you where we are, how we got here, who is behind it basically, where they are going with it and how they use what I call conology to bring us all to wherever they want us to be.
Conology is a science of conning people, the confidence trickster. It’s so imperative in a confidence trick that the victim must believe and participate in his own trick. He is tricked but he must participate in it thinking all the way that he is making his own decisions and making his own choices right to the end when he realizes he’s just been ripped off. That’s how a confidence trick works. You NEED the participation of the victim and that’s how the world is run, especially when it comes to freedom. The big boys who always shout about freedom and equality were confidence tricksters. They needed the masses to get them where they wanted to go. Once they were in power, of course they are the most despicable tyrants the world has ever seen in the past, ala the Soviet Union, or we’ll see anywhere else on the planet. They slaughter like you would not believe. They always depopulate, always depopulate. All those at the bottom that helped them get there think, well, they’ll leave us alone because after all, we are the workers, we are the ones that they’re on about wanting to help us, a workers’ paradise. Well you have to go back even into the French Revolution. They weren’t just chopping off the heads of the nobility and people who objected to this particular new system, they were also killing off the peasantry in the different areas, the provinces of France; the ones they said were SURPLUS. They always do that. They always go for the peasants that can grow their food, especially the ones who might be poor by other standards but are totally self-sufficient. They slaughter them. They would put them on boats and sink them for instance; that was a popular sport with the liberators of the working class.
In the Soviet Union, we know the same thing happed there. About 7 million died, maybe 10 million died with the first starvation because they killed off all the little peasant farmers. They wanted the state to get in control of farming but the problem was that they killed off pretty well anyone who knew how to do it. Then they went into the Ukraine and did the same kind of thing, while they were exporting the grain of the Ukraine and killing off millions by pure starvation. That’s in The Soviet Story. People should get that video if they can. That was by the orders of Stalin. That’s what they are like. Horror shows. The people at the bottom are stunned because they can’t… well, wait a minute, this whole thing was for us wasn’t it? The ones at the bottom? Oh foolish man, eh, oh foolish man. That’s what Weishaupt kept saying, “Oh foolish man, what can you not be made to believe?” He was talking in the reference to the mystery religion. He says, you need a good mystery to pull people in. That gets the members in. You never give them a truth to it or an answer to it; you just keep the mystery going. He also said, “What can you not be made to believe?”
It’s the same thing as Lord Bertrand Russell. Amazing guy. He participated in all these world events to bring in this world socialist system. This guy was a hereditary Lord, a British Lord. He was the head of so many foundations -at least the spokesman for them - you can’t keep up with them all. He worked for the United Nations eventually. He worked setting up the League of Nations before World War II. He went over to China to teach in universities to bring in the concept of communism. He was teaching communism before there were communists in China. During World War II he worked for MI-5 as a propagandist. All those people definitely wanted rid of the Nazis with a passion and they all came together and went into MI-5. Then he was back into his ban-the-bomb stuff. He was the head of the biggest organization for peace, as they called it. He advocated the Soviet system for an awful long time. Then they quieted it down a bit when they found out how many people they had slaughtered under the Stalin regime. They all quieted down but they didn’t stop believing in it. He was also one of the head of the Pugwash Foundation that came out about world peace.
They are always talking about world peace. This present bunch too, is always on about world peace will come through a world society under a global governance. Governance means basically, that you will be trained that you are governed and to wean you off the idea of democracy; we are post democratic now and democracy has had its day apparently. The Club of Rome, they are the guys who came up with the scam of global warming because they were TOLD to find a way to con the public. They ADMIT it in their own book, The First Global Revolution. I’ve given the quote so many times from the book I won’t do it again. They go through all of this as well, the conology techniques and where they are going with it and all the rest of it. So do your homework, do the research, go through the archives of my shows and look up the books I’ve mentioned for yourself. World peace will come apparently through this new system. The Club of Rome said that democracy was too cumbersome, they couldn’t get done what they wanted to so they would have to train the public basically that, don’t even participate, just accept you are being ruled and be happy about it. You know something? They’ve done that. That’s been achieved; most folk are really quite happy as long as they can play with the internet and do their little thing - whatever they’re in to - play as avatars in some fictional reality, watch their porn or TV - which is the same thing - and go to the pub. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. It’s amazing. We live in this double-speak, double-think world, this Orwellian and yet going into Brave New World scenario where eventually we’ll all be cloned IF we have good enough genes and if not, tough cheese; you’re down the sewage I guess, to be recycled into good drinking water. That’s how it’s going to go. We are living through it. This generation doesn’t have to guess, like I said at the beginning of the show, as to what is planned.
In the 1800s, many of the church groups used to wonder and try to go through Revelations and see if it pertained to that day and get an idea how it would happen, how would all this evil come about? We are actually living through it all and people can’t recognize it. We are living right through it all; this is it. Into the brave new world where a tiny minority will rule over the rest, live in a standard of luxury we can’t even imagine with the highest of technology, while the bottom are living like utter peasants in straw huts, if we’re lucky. That’s eco-friendly you see, living under straw. The people right now can’t believe it because it’s presented to them in such a way that they can not believe that anyone would go to this trouble, never mind have the power to go all this trouble and the means to do so, to fool them. That’s why they can’t believe it. We’ve all been trained, as Lord Bertrand Russell said, we’ve all been trained to believe in experts. Just pull up an expert and that’s what they have on everything now, an expert, and the expert says … and that’s it. It’s like God had spoken. The new high priest, you see, and you can’t refute God.
Lord Monckton, who did a good job in putting out to the world the real facts of this con of global warming and has had a lot of press, was at the Copenhagen meeting. An article went out on the 19th of December from the Sonoran Weekly Review.
Lord Monckton Assaulted to the point of unconsciousness by EuroThug Police at Copenhagen
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen
Saturday, December 19th, 2009 | sonoranweeklyreview.com
(Alan: This is Lord Monckton talking.)
Is The European Police State Going Global? (A: Well, it is actually.)
Today the gloves came off and the true purpose of the “global warming” scare became nakedly visible. Ugo Chavez, the Socialist president of Venezuela, blamed “global warming” on capitalism – and received a standing ovation from very nearly all of the delegates, lamentably including those from those of the capitalist nations of the West that are on the far Left (A: That’s pretty well all of us, I guess. The whole world is like that now whether they know it or not.) – and that means too many of them.
Previously Robert Mugabe, dictator of Rhodesia, who had refused to leave office when he had been soundly defeated in a recent election, had also won plaudits at the conference for saying that the West ought to pay him plenty of money (A: He wants plenty of money.) in reparation of our supposed “climate debt”. (A: Mr. Mugabe is con-game savvy.)
Inside the conference center, “world leader” after “world leader” got up and postured about the need to Save The Planet, the imperative to do a deal, the necessity to save the small island nations from drowning, etc., etc., etc. (A: Even when they’re building hotels on them now because they haven’t sunk after 50 years of the same propaganda. I’ve read articles on that in the past too.)
(A: By the way, it was quite a snow over the weekend. It brought a good part of Europe, France definitely, to a standstill. Even the trains that go under the Channel, through the tunnel, were all conking out, just packing in because they are not used to snow. Britain had all their aircraft grounded as well. So did some of the other countries because of this massive blizzard they had and freeze up… because of global warming, you see.)
Outside, in the real world, it was snowing, and a foretaste of the Brave New World being cooked up by “world leaders” in their fantasy-land was already evident. Some 20,000 observers from non-governmental organizations (A: Now, that’s the new Soviet; that’s the definition of the new Soviet. Soviet means ‘rule by councils’. In the Soviet system, the Politburo APPOINTED the leaders of the non-governmental organizations and there was one for every area of life and one for every work group as well. Here, they’re run by the foundations that are run by the big bankers and international corporations that own the finances of the planet. That’s how they bypassed the so-called democracy. Now they have them ‘on board’ to get appointed to government panels as advisors. See, we ARE Sovietized.) – nearly all of them true-believing Green groups funded by taxpayers – had been accredited to the conference.
However, without warning the UN had capriciously decided that all but 300 of them were to be excluded from the conference today, and all but 90 would be excluded on the final day. (A: That’s what they do at the United Nations, because they’re so democratic. They want the whole world to know most of the spin but only the real hardened leaders are in on the final day of where they’ve been, where they’re going and all the rest of it.)
Of course, this being the inept UN, no one had bothered to notify those of the NGOs that were not true-believers in the UN’s camp. So Senator Steve Fielding of Australia and I turned up with a few dozen other delegates, to be left standing in the cold for a couple of hours while the UN laboriously worked out what to do with us. (A: By the way, these greenie organizations and groups, these NGOs also get your tax money funded by your government as well. You are truly sovietized.)
In the end, they decided to turn us away, which they did with an ill grace and in a bad-tempered manner. As soon as the decision was final, the Danish police moved in. One of them began the now familiar technique of manhandling me (A: This is Lord Monckton.), in the same fashion as one of his colleagues had done the previous day.
Once again, conscious that a police helicopter with a high-resolution camera was hovering overhead, I thrust my hands into my pockets in accordance with the St. John Ambulance crowd-control training, looked my assailant in the eye and told him, quietly but firmly, to take his hands off me.
He complied, but then decided to have another go. I told him a second time, and he let go a second time. I turned to go and, after I had turned my back, he gave me a mighty shove that flung me to the ground and knocked me out.
I came to some time later (not sure exactly how long), to find my head being cradled by my friends, some of whom were doing their best to keep the police thugs at bay while the volunteer ambulance-men attended to me. (A: Then he goes through what happened and so on and so on. Then he talks about he’s going to really bring this to the top to get some justice done on this particular kind of instance and he has the power to do it. Most folk don’t have the power to get any comeback and revenge, I would call it. Revenge is a natural human thing and we do have that have capacity in us and if we fail to use it, the thugs just get more and more aggressive. You’ve got to have revenge. So he’ll do it through the only means you have right now which is the sort of law system, the legal, law system.)
It’s amazing. I keep talking about Britain being the flagship - and that’s what they call it - for this new world order because the whole world order, including the United Nations system, was to be MODELED on the British Empire. You already had Britain with all its colonies under control; that was to be the nucleus that everything was to be built on for a new world order into a global system. Therefore, everything is spearheaded through Britain. Britain really, is the premier test group for trying new things out on the public in this new world of socialism and compliance. It says here…
(A: This is how they put things out now in Britain.)
Gordon Brown calls for new group to police global environment issues
From The Times December 21, 2009 / Ben Webster, Francis Elliott
(A: A global police force.)
A new global body dedicated to environmental stewardship (A: I love how they put it, ‘stewardship.’) is needed to prevent a repeat of the deadlock which undermined the Copenhagen climate change summit, (A: Now here’s what it says.) Gordon Brown will say tomorrow. (A: He hasn’t said it yet. See, Gordon Brown is just a Fabian and he’s not a very good actor but he’s an actor nonetheless. So the guys who write the script for him simply hand the script to the press and they publish it before Mr. Brown goes through it. He will go through it tomorrow and he’ll say all the things I’m going to say here, because he’s reading the same script, but he’ll pause here and there for effect and maybe stare down his nose at the audience once in a while for more effect and drama. But it’s the same script. This is how farcical it all is now. Why not do away with the Prime Ministers and Presidents and just get the guys that write the scripts to come out? We’d save some cash.)
The UN’s consensual method of negotiation, which requires all 192 countries to reach agreement, needs to be reformed to ensure that the will of the majority prevails, he feels.
The Prime Minister will say: [Alan speaking with a deep, bass, authoritarian voice.] “Never again should we face the deadlock that threatened to pull down those talks. Never again should we let a global deal to move towards a greener future be held to ransom by only a handful of countries. One of the frustrations for me was the lack of a global body with the sole responsibility for environmental stewardship. (A: So they are going to plunder it and steal the planet from YOU and everything you have because they are now taking care of it for you. See, that’s called THEFT and they’re calling it ‘stewardship.’ Beautiful terminology isn’t it? It confuses most folk and they go along with it.)
“I believe that in 2010 we will need to look at reforming our international institutions to meet the common challenges we face as a global community.” (A: It’s amazing too that people even bother voting isn’t it? When they get up there, I speak for all Britons and I… Suddenly, once they’re in, here he is speaking for a global community. Folk still don’t get it do they? Then he goes through the lie…) The summit failed to produce a political agreement among all the countries. (A: Utter rubbish. You see, the whole Copenhagen thing was a done deal. This is a formality we went through, this show. All they agreed to was the most important thing of all, to basically AGREE on every other treaty that Copenhagen, the next Copenhagen Treaty brings up. That’s how they did it with Kyoto; get it on the table first, agreeing to agree to all the stuff to come, and that’s it. They don’t have to ratify it; it’s all just rammed through, it went right through. The public are out of the loop here. We are not even in the picture. We are not even consulted. What’s this got to do with national governments and election time? Nothing. Zilch. What’s it got to do with everyone of us across the planet? EVERYTHING. And yet we are bypassed completely. Boy, oh boy, I tell ya. Every tyrant in history would salivate to the technique that’s used today.) Delegates instead passed a motion on Saturday “taking note” of an accord drawn up the night before by five countries: the US, China, India, Brazil and South Africa.
Despite being the first world leader to join the summit, Mr Brown was excluded from the key meeting where the compromise was decided. (A: Well if he could lick enough boots he’d be up higher and he’d get in the bigger meeting. If he continues to sell out his own country at this rate, they might eventually let him up there, if he’s very, very lucky.)
Ed Miliband, the Climate Change Secretary, (A: This is the guy who is more important than the Prime Minister. Miliband, he’s got relatives all through the ex-Soviet Union by the way, and here he is running Britain. Lord Mandelson said he [Mandelson] ran Britain when Brown was on holiday, from Rothschild’s swimming pool in France. That was in the papers. That’s the height of arrogance that these guys, the real leaders, are at today.) Ed Miliband, the Climate Change Secretary, (A: He’s definitely a change agent.) admitted today that the results of the Copenhagen conference were “disappointing” because of the absence of agreement on emissions targets or a deadline for turning the accord into a legally binding treaty.
Mr Miliband pointed the finger of blame at China for resisting a legal agreement and its rejection of a proposal for 50 per cent cut in global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Efforts to give legal force to the commitments in the Copenhagen accord came up against “impossible resistance from a small number of developing countries, including China, who didn’t want a legal agreement”, he said. (A: How can they call them developing countries? China… China, apart from being THE manufacturer of the planet for everything that we need today, created through GATT, The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs where all the countries gave all their industry to China because of the cheap labor; the West trained their engineers for 30 years before they even had the factories to put them in. Lots of them came to Canada to be trained here and the States and Britain and elsewhere. This was planned back in the 30s. How can they call it a third world country, developing nation, when it holds all of the debt of the US? Huh? Isn’t it the other way around? The US is now going into the developing… or post-developed nations? …who are on the way down? Again, terminology is meant to confuse you; it works with most folk.)
Challenged over accusations that the agreement reached in Copenhagen failed to protect poor people in developing countries, Mr Miliband (A: …who really cares, of course.) said: “The eventual outcome was disappointing. But the idea that walking away from agreement would have been better for people facing climate change is frankly ridiculous.
“I think we can protect and help those people’s lives and indeed protect them from climate change through this agreement. (A: The third world is going to be demolished even more with this law here because they’re all out for depopulation of the third world. Maybe Mr. Mugabe and all these boys will take their big payoffs and eventually, as it’s all going under, they’ll skip off to some nice hot country, like Idi Amin did… with the protection of the British government, after looting his own country and slaughtering thousands. It’s all rigged, all rigged. And all the leaders are rigged too, across the world.)
“The fact is that we have got fast-start finance of $10 billion a year flowing as a result of this agreement.” He said it was important that countries had agreed for the need to make emissions cuts, even though they had failed to commit to specific targets. (A: They are already floating figures like 100 billion. This is to go ultimately through the Rothschild bank in Switzerland, their private one. I’ve read the article FROM Rothschild himself talking about it. Then it’s supposed to start to not quite flow… it’s more like a dribble; that will dribble from Rothschild’s bank. It will FLOW to his bank and DRIBBLE out of his bank and a good chunk gets to the United Nations because they want global taxations so they can rise up to their phoenix-like status of ruling the world. For the poor countries, it doesn’t dribble, they get the occasional drip. That’s what it’s all about.
It’s all conology isn’t it and we’re all living through it. Here they are… future historians will have a gleeful time going through this whole deal at Copenhagen when they are snowed in, there’s a blizzard there and everything in Europe comes to a standstill because everything is freezing, even the trains all came to a standstill. Utter farce isn’t it? Mind you, farce will win out in the end if you keep repeating the lies often enough… and there is no end to that. No end to that. They have whole think tanks coming up with next year’s lies. They probably have them all written already.
Boy, oh boy, they want us to die off quicker. ‘Videos may aid end-of-life decisions.’ This is the new Obama system coming in. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I should mention there that Miliband is not a Lord yet. He will eventually get his Lordship. It was the other one, Mandelson, that’s got the Lordship now, the one who ran Britain from the swimming pool according to the British newspapers while Brown was off on holiday. Why bother having Parliament anymore? Just have a swimming pool. That’s all you need. It would be cheaper too to keep one guy going in a swimming pool that’s heated than a whole Parliament of yes-men. Mind you, they are friends and they’ve got a lot more in common than just where they stand on things.
This article is
Videos may aid end-of-life care decisions
Thu Dec 17, 2009 / By Amy Norton
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Videos that depict different options for end-of-life care may help terminally ill cancer patients decide on what they want, a new study suggests. (A: I love how they word stuff. Everything ‘suggests’ things now.)
Research shows that only a minority of cancer patients complete documents on advance care planning -- and that even when doctors and patients have discussions on end-of-life care, (A: I wonder if they really do? I mean generally they don’t. It depends on who you are doesn’t it? If you’re a somebody or a nobody.) poor communication and patients' lack of medical knowledge remain significant obstacles.
(A: Then it goes through the study where they show them videos on how to choose basically; that’s the idea.) Using video to supplement end-of-life discussions "helps surmount some of these barriers," said Volandes, of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
For their study, Volandes and his colleagues randomly assigned 50 patients with malignant glioma -- a form of brain cancer with a typically poor prognosis -- to one of two groups. Patients in one group were given only a verbal description of their options for care once their cancer had become "very advanced," while those in the other group also watched a video. (A: This is right along their lines of the RAND document I have here they did for the US government to see where they could cut all health care down to the bare bones so it’s like Britain. The UN says you will get the most minimal health care, across the world. Well, here we go.)
The video depicted images of three general choices for end-of-life care. One was life-prolonging care, which aims to extend patients' lives "at all costs," (A: That’s for the very wealthy. Depending on your status in the community, are you necessary to the society? I’m adding what they’re not telling you here.) including giving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest and using a mechanical ventilator when patients can no longer breathe on their own.
A second (A: The medium option.) option was basic medical care -- which includes, for example, antibiotics to treat infections and hospitalization if needed, but no extraordinary measures to save the patient's life.
The third option (A: Which of course is the cheapo option.) was "comfort care," (A: It sounds good, comfort.) where patients are given pain medication, supplemental oxygen and other measures to make them comfortable in their last days (A: It means they change your linen.)-- usually outside of a hospital, and often at home.
So they’re going in to this new system, getting the public trained to a new system of exiting the world. You know it all sounds rather wonderful, comfort-care. ‘Comfort’ sounds nice; it’s a nice fuzzy word. It’s like the word ‘social.’ Social in itself is nice but then you say social-ism and -ism means DOCTRINE. Of course, you say I didn’t know there was a doctrine to social. You see. Or commune-ism and all that kind of -ism stuff.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada - where it’s about 12-15 below freezing - it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Transcribed by Diana