Nov. 10, 2009 (#448)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 10, 2009:

Carbon Taxes all Farts -- Protest Before it Starts:

"New Socialist Order, Moving into Next Praxis,
Unveiling Their Scheme, Personal Carbon Taxes,
We're Training for Poverty, Under the Guise,
Using Psycho-Linguistics to Cover the Lies,
As the New Feudal Order Comes into View,
CEOs the New Overlords, Vast Wealth for the Few,
A Plethora of Agencies, Private, Selected
To Micro-Govern the People, None Elected,
Freedom to Choose Obsolete, Each Life Directed
By Agencies, Cradle to Grave, Objectors Suspected
Of Carrying 'Individualist' Gene, Allergic to Blind Obedience,
Scoff at Warming/Carbon Scams, Indeed They Give No Credence"
© Alan Watt Nov. 10, 2009

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 10, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November 10th 2009.  For the newcomers, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and you’ll find hundreds of hours of audio you can download.  I’ve put them up over quite a few years.  I try to show you the shortcuts to understanding the big picture because really, we float through our lives.  We’re not given the truth as it happens.   We’re given news blurbs daily for sure, but we’re never really told why it all is out there, why it ties together or how it ties together, or even the big agencies behind them all.  I try to show you that the future is always planned, always planned.  The whole idea of a new world order is the combination of a hundred-odd years of planned enterprise to bring it all into being, working through education, working through all commerce and working through big bureaus that bring it together through international rules and regulations.  So we’ve never really had freedom for well over a century.  We thought we had it but mind you, they always bring the flags out of the countries, when they want you to go off and fight for their new world order.  That’s what wars are all about really; it’s STANDARDIZATION of the planet under the one system.  Once you’ve finished off the last war, they pull away your flag and give you a new world flag.  That’s what’s happening now. 

 

So look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site.  Look at all the sites I have listed on the front page there, if you scroll down [listed above].  These are the ONLY AUTHORIZED sites that I’m on.  Anything else is bogus.  alanwattsentientsentinel.eu is the European site.  It has the same audios but it has the addition of transcripts of a lot of the talks I’ve given in the various languages of Europe.  As I say, anything else out there is bogus.  Every so often I get a flurry of bogus sites going up pretending they are me.  So be very, very careful of what you look into.  Whatever you do, don’t donate unless it’s one of these official sites. 

 

Remember too, you bring me to you… you the listeners.  No one backs me up here.  I’m not a part of an NGO.  I’m not part of a big business enterprise.  There’s no foundation backing me.  It’s up to you, the listeners, to keep me going by buying that which I have for sale on the web site or donating to me.  Remember too, you can also donate through [options listed at top and bottom of transcript].  For those who just get the disks burned and passed to them to play in their CD players, you can get in touch with me at [address above].  That’s out of the way. 

 

It’s a sad thing with you have to ask people to back you up.  But then again, it’s understandable because we live in an era where the youngsters all think everything is free.  What they don’t realize is that everything that’s free out there is simply for data collection and to get them ON it.  They are compliant with it.  They have no idea of personal privacy or even the value of personal privacy.  They have no knowledge of totalitarian states of the past.  The first thing a totalitarian state does is register everyone, make sure they know ALL about you and they keep all the data and they update it all the time, on their subjects.  That’s really what the internet is for.  This great tool is for their benefit, not for ours.  Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  When the big attack on the towers happened on September the 11th 2001, I was on the radio I think that night or the night after and I said, you know this is the start for a push for a war scenario on the whole world.  That’s what it was for.  It was a signal.  It was a big signal… that obviously had been planned in advance.  I said nothing is going to be the same; I was echoing the words of one of the big players on TV at the time who said, ‘nothing is going to be the same after this.’  He meant NOTHING is going to be the same, nothing.  Everything was going to change. 

 

For a war scenario, I said at the time, you got to bring in refugees, get them moving from place to place.  How do you do that?  You can do it through pandemics or a whole bunch of different reasons.  You’ve got have rationing brought in.  I went through all the things that happen during warfare.  I knew darned well they were going to go along with The Club of Rome’s idea… mandate, I should say.  They came up with the idea of a war type scenario where everyone pulls together for a common cause.  We give up rights and liberties and freedoms to help the common cause for the good of all type of an idea.  That’s why slogans in war are famous for saying, ‘We’re all in it together.’  Stuff like that.  I knew it was all coming along.  Sure enough. 

 

This whole idea… it’s all how you perceive things.  That’s how things are presented to you.  If you want to steal something from someone, even the basic right to feed themselves, you can do it overtly by sending in the King’s men who just steal the food OR you can condition the children to grow up with a different way of looking at everything, everything at all.  So much so, that if it came to being stuck in the wilderness somewhere and someone killed a deer, none of them would eat it because they’d been brought up vegetarian and it was taboo to eat meat OR you could teach them that here you are in the middle of the forest and it’s covered in snow and you’re frozen, what do you do to heat yourself?  The last thing they will think of is stripping off birch bark and getting a fire going because it puts carbon off.  I’m not kidding about that. 

 

You can literally alter a person’s survival capabilities by distorting the outcomes of the logic of their instincts.  That’s how you can rob a whole planet.  That’s how you can condition the planet into having no rights, no freedoms, and to having them turn into slaves… without using the term slave.  There are many, many ways to do it and it’s done all the time.  We are the most studies species on the planet.  Long before they were cutting up bugs and cutting up frogs and all the rest of it and studying them in the wilderness, WE – human beings - have been studied for thousands and thousands and who knows how many thousands… or even millions of years. 

 

Knowledge is never lost.  Never lost.  The art of governing people was understood in ancient times PERFECTLY WELL.  You always have to give them a religion for the era.  You must enforce that religion of the era.  Anyone who doesn’t go along with it is severely punished or even killed until you have the perfect generation who bow to whatever it is that you stick in front of them and give up everything that they have, including their first born if need be… and they’ll do it willingly.  You can alter people’s perceptions if you understand the sciences, very ancient sciences.

 

So we’re all being turned into a global society where we’re all in it together, as always, and it’s up to US ALL to suffer equally, except for those at the top who plan it all and manage it all… as it’s always been.  When you hear things floated a few years back like carbon taxes… what a great con, carbon taxes.  Really, under the guise of we all have to suffer to save everyone, we all have to suffer to save everyone, we have to start paying for stuff that is in the air, naturally, by the way.  Carbon dioxide is a very low percentage of the so-called greenhouse gases.  Nothing would live on the planet - the plants and so on - without carbon dioxide, but that’s never pushed.  It’s always a threat, a big unseen threat.  The same thing as staving off Armageddon… by your prayers… hoping to stave it off; or in ancient times, you would sacrifice so many children so your enemies wouldn’t come any closer.  That’s how it’s done.  It’s science, science of the mind. 

 

When you hear again, the carbon taxes… again, they introduce it as though it’s only… They always do this with any kind of tax.  ‘The rich are going to pay; you’ll be okay.’  So, international corporations are going to have to pay for their share of carbon production during the processing and all that.  Meanwhile, you find out a couple of years later, that all the big international corporations were given millions if not billions of FREE credit taxes and they’ve already started their own trading business between each other, the so-called ‘offset’ idea.  So they’re making a profit off it.  The whole intention - as always with these things - is to hit everyone else at the bottom and you can’t, you CAN’T get free goodies and free tickets, free anything to do with carbon.  You’re going to end up paying for it all of course.  That’s what you always do at the bottom… always.

 

Elitism is elitism.  I don’t care what name they give it.  Communism, Fascism, Capitalism, it’s all the same thing really, isn’t it?  Under Capitalism, those at the top never pay their taxes.  They’ve had many documentaries, even the BBC did them on the Queen, after a big tax hike and Elton John spoke out at the time and says, no, they always put loopholes in for their very wealthy - like himself obviously - and they come out unscathed.  Sometimes they come out with more, even though they paid nothing in.  That’s not a bad deal is it?  So that’s the reality of taxes.  It’s never for the people at the bottom.  Any more than government agencies deal with the poor or so on.  By the time anything trickles down to the poor, from the multi-billions of dollars that are supposedly spent and passed through layers of bureaucrats’ pockets on the way down, there’s hardly anything ever, ever left. 

 

Everything is a con game… but this fantastic world order with its carbon taxes always was intended to hit you at the bottom to control you and to get you into a war mode.  I said even at the time, they would use the word ‘ration’ and sure enough, we’re getting it all. 

 

Carbon ration account for all proposed by Environment Agency

(Alan:  Even having an Environment Agency… it’s right out of some ancient religion.  Like the sun priests that would pray for the sun to come up and you give them all that you had.  If you didn’t pay them, they wouldn’t pray for the sun and you’d live in perpetual darkness.  So here you have an Environment Agency.  The environment has always been here, before any agency was created, and it will be here long after they’ve gone.  Even in the newspapers, they have Environmental Editors.  Everybody’s got a greenie editor.  You think this isn’t a mandate?  Since when in the past did they have a Christian editor or whatever?  Well, a long, long time ago they would.  See, this is the new religion.  And like all religions, it’s meant to totally dominate and control you… on behalf of those at the top.)

If people used up their yearly ration early, they would have to buy extra from those who had not used their full allowance

(A:  Here’s the real intention of it.)

Ben Webster, Environment Editor  /  From The Times November 9, 2009

 

Everyone should be given an annual carbon ration (A:  A ration, right.) and face financial penalties if they exceed it, under a proposal by the Environment Agency.  (A:  Did anybody VOTE in an environment agency?  Of course we didn’t… but we’re POST democratic you understand.) 

 

Lord Smith of Finsbury (A:  Another Lord here.), the agency’s chairman, will say (A:  Will say today… see they give out their speech from the scriptwriter before they actually go out and legally, they speak it legally to the press on TV, that’s a legalism.  So they hand out what he’s going to say from the scriptwriter beforehand.) today that rationing is the fairest and most effective way of meeting Britain’s legally binding (A:  They always put that in…) targets (A:  With whom?  With the United Nations, you see, the big front organization for totalitarianism the world over.  Legally binding targets… were any of you asked to vote on anything like this?  No.  Of course not… we are post-democratic.)  for cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

 

People would be given a “carbon account” and a unique number that they would have to submit when making purchases of carbon-intensive items such as petrol, electricity or airline tickets. (A:  That’s going to happen in the States too at the same time, by the way, and everywhere else across the planet, because we are global.)  As with a bank account, people would receive statements showing the carbon weight of each purchase and how much of their ration remained.

 

If they used up their ration within a year, they would have to buy extra credits from those who had not used their full allowance.

 

Lord Smith, (A:  Before he was made the Environment specialist, he was the CULTURAL specialist…) who was Culture Secretary in Tony Blair’s Government (A:  They shuffle them around.  They’re just front men.), believes that the system would encourage people to think about the carbon cost of their purchases as well as reward those who lived frugally (A:  That means poverty.) and did little travelling (A:  You know, the bottom classes.), who could make a significant profit from selling their unused credits.  (A:  Yeah, right!)

 

Speaking at the agency’s annual conference in London, Lord Smith will say that carbon rationing would help people to “judge how they want to develop their own quality of life in a sustainable way”.  (A:  Here they are getting sterilized and all the rest of it and have to pay for the air they breathe out with the carbon dioxide.  And he’s talking about ‘in a sustainable way,’ to benefit whom?)

 

He believes that rationing would be fairer than taxing carbon because extra taxes could make certain activities, such as flying, too expensive for people on low incomes. (A:  It already is.  [Alan laughing]  It already is.  And the guys at the top just put it down on their expenses don’t they… for their taxes, write-offs, taxes.)  If everyone had an equal free carbon allowance, the basic cost of flying would remain cheap but those who flew a lot would quickly use up their ration and have to purchase extra carbon credits for each additional flight.  (Back with more after this break.)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Times to do with the carbon taxes we’ve all to pay PERSONALLY, personally.  It goes along with the Smart Meters too they are putting in across the world.  Ontario has been doing it for the last few years and even my area is going to get it, apparently, next year.  These so called Smart Meters can turn items OFF in your house if they think you are overusing something.  Mind you, they’ll give you a budget plan so that you’ll KNOW you’re overdoing it a little bit here or there and you have to cut out that extra cup of tea or whatever else it’s going to be, or your cooler goes off or your lights just go off.  And they are going to bring in after that, the next stage, which is where you’ll pay in ADVANCE for your expected energy supply, what you expect to use.  Then they’ll just cut it off for you when you go up to it or just over it.  Isn’t that nice of them? 

 

It’s amazing, especially in Canada because Pierre Trudeau, the big communist guy that got in without a single media in Canada mentioning the fact that he LEAD the Communist International group from Canada to Moscow in 1952.  Nobody even mentioned that when he ran to be the Prime Minister.  Again, he’s another multi-millionaire communist, to dispel the myth that it’s a ‘working man’s’ thing.  He was on TV all through the 60s and 70s, definitely the 70s and 80s, on ads.  He would appear on the ads personally because they wanted to use the nationalized system to bring it in and build these big atomic power stations.  He had ads saying ‘leave your lights on all night long because it’s so cheap, cheap, cheap.’  That’s what they do.  They nationalize things to get the money from the tax payer - and then tell you it’s yours, make you feel better - Then they go and sell it off to their pals for a few pennies.  That’s the standard technique they’ve done for about a century in Britain with different things. So here we are going according to plan and now we have to PAY for everything and be cut off if you go over a certain budget. 

 

Remember too, this big deal that the world is signing – the whole world is signing on; Obama is signing on it in December – is going to hit the US like a ton of bricks… that they’re not looking for. 

 

Under the Climate Change Act, (A:  Why not just call it weather changes, where you get your umbrella one day and your T-shirt the next.  It’s called Climate Change Act…)  Britain is obliged to cut its emissions by 80 per cent on 1990 levels by 2050. This means annual CO2 emissions per person will have to fall from about 9 tonnes to only 2 tonnes.  (A:  I tell you, we’re going to be some skinny, skinny people… if anybody survives this even.  I doubt they will even survive it.)

 

Rationing would make it much easier to meet the target because the total amount of permitted emissions under the Act would simply be divided by the size of population.  (A:  So it’s going to be an incentive for population reduction.  See how it beautifully ties together.  Then they’ll use SOCIAL APPROVAL and SOCIAL DISAPPROVAL where if someone’s got a bigger family, they’re using more than you, so you’re ALL suffering collectively and you’ll go and nag them all, put them to shame for having more than one child.  This is the same techniques they used in China.)

 

The Department for Environment (A:  Department of the Environment… Gods of the air, eh?  Isn’t that beautiful?), Food and Rural Affairs published a feasibility study last year which found that rationing was technically feasible and could be effective in cutting emissions.  (A:  You don’t want to go into a room with these guys on these big study groups and their big commissions; they get so much food in them, umpteen different courses.  You wouldn’t want to be in the same room when they’ve finished eating for the emissions that they put off.)

 

Defra said at the time: “The study indicates that personal carbon trading has potential to engage individuals in taking action to combat climate change.” However, it said that the idea was “ahead of its time” and would be very expensive to implement.  (A:  It’s coming.)

 

The statement concluded: “The Government remains interested in the concept of personal carbon trading and, although it will not be continuing its research programme at this stage, it will monitor the wealth of research focusing on this area and may introduce personal carbon trading if the value of carbon savings and cost implications change.”

 

The House of Commons (A:  That’s like the Congress) Environmental Audit Committee  (A:  An Environmental Audit Committee…) called on the Government last year to resume research on a rationing scheme and to be “courageous” in seeking to overcome likely public hostility to the idea.  (A:  It’s a pity the public wouldn’t become a little hostile, to be honest with you, and get courageous and tell them where to stuff it.)

 

It said in a report: “Opposition to personal carbon trading could be reduced if the public could be convinced (A:  That means trained.) of three things. First, that it is absolutely essential to reduce emissions; second, that this can only be achieved if individuals take personal responsibility for reducing their own emissions (A:  That sounds rather vulgar, eh?); and third, that personal carbon trading is a fairer and more effective way of reducing personal emissions than alternatives such as higher taxes.”  (A:  It IS a darn tax!  …under a guise, a beautiful guise they are going to CON people with.) The committee concluded: “Widespread public acceptance, while desirable, should not be a pre-condition for a personal carbon trading scheme (A:  In other words, it doesn’t matter if we want it or not… public acceptance.); the need to reduce emissions is simply too urgent.”  (A:  They should take some bicarbonate of soda all at once, these boys.)

 

David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary (A:  What an interesting history.  This guy, his people ran out of Germany when Adolf Hitler came in.  He and I think he’s got another Miliband in the British government; they’ve made a CAREER since then in the British government.  Just found out that his other cousins and aunts worked for the Soviet Union as scientists.  Good communists.  Back with more after this break.), called for a “thought experiment” on carbon rationing when he was Environment Secretary in 2006.

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  I’ve mentioned before how China had its cultural revolution.  You’ve got to understand the Marxist policies and the ongoing dialectic, as they call it, where they start off with a thesis, then they put in opposition to the thesis, its antithesis, and out comes the NEW synthesis.  The synthesis becomes the new thesis and they go on.  In other words, this is their idea of creating progress, directed progress.  Directed… is the important word there. 

 

This had been used across the world and people don’t even know it, that there IS a cultural revolution going on.  In China, they actually had the young people drag even their parents on the streets for holding on to ‘old-fashioned’ values.  They were ‘contaminated’ with old worldly ideas and memories.  You got to understand they are using the same techniques now to do with people who aren’t going along with the greening and all the rest of it.  People who have a little memory of a bit of personal freedom and rights and stupidness and silliness and all the rest of it… of government… they are targeting them.  Actually, the cops in the UK and Europe, are targeting the citizens, the over 40s.  This is The Mail Online.

 

How police are making criminals of the over-40s:

Target culture fuels rise in first-time convictions for middle aged

By James Slack  /  27th October 2009  /  The Mail Online

 

Record numbers of middle-aged people are being ‘criminalised’ by target-chasing police.

 

The number of over-40s receiving a first conviction or caution has increased by half since 2001.

 

It is now running at a startling 65 a day, according to new Government figures.

 

After decades of abiding by the law, people are being punished for crimes such as motoring offences or refusing to pay wheelie-bin (A:  Their garbage.) fines.

 

Liberal Democrat spokesman Chris Huhne said they were being pursued so police could meet the targets imposed by Labour.  (A:  The government has told the cops to target an age group, the over-40s.  Cultural war, you see, the Cultural Revolution.)

 

These give the same weight to catching a speeding motorist as to snaring a rapist or paedophile.  (A:  So if you didn’t bring out your wheelie-bin or put it in the proper place or it was half an inch open at the top, you’re fined.  You’re fined as much as if you were a rapist.  That’s how they treat you.)

 

Mr Huhne said last night: ‘Labour (A:  The government.) have criminalised a generation and treated tens of thousands of law-abiding middle-aged and elderly citizens like villains.’

 

Parliamentary answers show the number of first-time entrants to the criminal justice system who are over 50 increased by 46.3 per cent between 2000/01 and 2007/08, from 16,400 to 24,000.

 

In the 40-49 age group, the leap was 57.4 per cent, with 32,900 previously law-abiding people being criminalised.

 

The increases in the middle-aged groups far outstripped the general picture. In the population as a whole, there was a rise of just 18.6 per cent.  (A:  But it’s 57.4% with the over 40s to 50s.)

 

The figures reflect the fact that many of Labour’s new spot fines (A:  You just pay on the spot.) for ‘crimes’ such as overfilling a wheelie bin are aimed at householders.

 

These are more likely than the general population to be middle-aged. (A:  Because they resent the BS, that’s why.  They resent the BS.)

 

A first-time entrant is someone receiving their first court conviction or caution, as recorded on the police national computer.

 

Motoring offences, including things like not wearing a seatbelt (A:  Remember, you used to have choices at one time.), make up half the cases dealt with by the courts.

 

Drivers who challenge a speed camera ticket must go to court and will account for many of the punishments.

 

Refusing to accept a wheelie-bin fine can also lead to court.

 

Mr Huhne, who obtained the figures, said: ‘The soaring number of people being criminalised is a direct result of Labour’s target-driven, box-ticking approach to policing.

 

‘This Government has created a new crime for every day in office.  (A:  It’s true.  I don’t know if people realize they’ve put more laws through than any previous government combined in the whole of the British history.)

 

‘When motoring offences and rubbish-bin misdemeanours are worth the same as convictions for murder or rape, it is easy to see how we have slipped into mass criminalisation.’

 

Criminologist Dr David Green, of the Civitas think-tank, said the law-abiding middle-classes were being ‘deliberately targeted’ by police who had to achieve a large number of ‘sanction detections’ - solved crimes.

 

A recent report warned that the middle classes have lost confidence in the police.  (A:  It’s about time.  If they haven’t noticed it, it ain’t the police anymore.  It’s not policemen anymore.)

 

It said they have been alienated by a service which routinely targets ordinary people rather than serious criminals, simply to fill Government crime quotas.

 

Author Harriet Sergeant said incidents which would once have been ignored are now treated as crimes.

 

She said: ‘Complaints against the police have risen, with much of the increase coming from law-abiding, middleclass, middle-aged and retired people who no longer feel the police are on their side.’  (A:  Ho-oh, they’d better believe they are not on their side, not these young guys.  These aren’t the old type policemen.  This is the new world order’s policemen.)

 

I even watched… because I can’t watch any videos because Xplornet keeps punishing me for using Xplornet, plus it’s because of who I am too.  Even on tonight’s show, when I try to record the show live, they cut me off about 4 or 5 times… a night.  Xplornet, the high-speed internet.  The one they say is so great; the one that cost 5 times a much as the same service in the US… for half the service.  It punishes me for trying to watch a video.  It’s just amazing what really, really goes on in real life.  As I say, I saw a video that was sent to me, someone burned it, on what they call Cops.  That’s their police show.  They copied the American version basically.  It’s all to do with motorized offenses.  You saw this old guy, this old guy tottering along in his little car and the cops stop him.  Then they… they basically crush your car.  They bring in a crusher and they crush your car on the spot if your insurance has just run out, or your road taxes just run out.  They used to give you about 2 weeks when it ran out to pay.  They don’t any more.  They just crush it… right in front of you.  That’s it.  That’s the home of democracy; Britain, the home of democracy.  God help us all in that case, when they keep using democracy, as they tell us we are post-democratic.  Quite something eh? 

 

It’s also true that science fiction movies are predictive programming, even the comedy ones, especially the comedy ones.  They show you a lot in them, of things that are going to come.  Back I think in maybe the 80s, Stallone did a movie, The Demolition Man.  It shows you a future era of where lots of things happen.  Each time you say something that is incorrect, politically incorrect, or even swear, an instant fine would come out of a machine and everybody laughed. 

 

Grandfather arrested at dawn, DNA-tested and held in a police cell for SIX hours for swearing once at council official

By Daily Mail Reporter  /  10th November 2009

 

(A:  I’m surprised he only swore once at a council official.  Have you ever spoken to a council official?  It’s like talking to a lobster… with those beady eyes that just stare at you.)

 

A grandfather was arrested at dawn and held in a police cell for six hours for using a single swear-word in front of a council official.

 

Thomas Catcheside, 67, had his fingerprints and DNA taken, before being issued with an £80 fixed-penalty notice.

 

His arrest followed a dispute with a council official about 'dangerously slippery' communal stairs in his block of flats in Cambridge.

 

Mr Catcheside, who is chairman of his residents' group, has been campaigning for three years for safety improvements.  (A:  That’s why he’s a target as well you see.)

 

But when an official visiting the site prevented him from listening to a phone call to his supervisor on October 30, he finally lost his temper and said: 'Don't you tell me what I can and can't do in my own ****ing place.'

 

The official complained of feeling 'threatened' (A:  Oh dear, dear… maybe they blushed too?  I don’t know if you’ve ever watch the BBC and the filth that’s put out over the last 30 years with all these words in it.  Even that cop show that someone burned and set to me - because Xplornet is so darned awful - showed you these cops swearing at the people they were stopping.  They can swear at YOU but you can’t swear at them.  That’s the NEW world order.  If they feel threatened, that’s you, you’ve had it.  ‘Oh, I feel threatened.’  Maybe they also felt insulted.  That’s a terrible crime these days.  ‘You insulted me; that insulted me.’)  and six days later Mr Catcheside was arrested at 5.35am on suspicion of 'causing harassment, alarm or distress in a public place'.

 

That’s the sort of thing they are doing there.  What’s the outshoot of all of this stuff?  What’s the outcome of it?  The Daily Express.

 

4,000 PEOPLE A WEEK TRYING TO LEAVE UK

Immigration is rife, but thousands are quitting Britain

Sunday August 5, 2007  /  By Michael Knapp, Home Affairs Editor  /  dailyexpress.co.uk

 

(A:  Remember I read Jacques Attali’s book called Millennium?  The one he wrote before 9/11 happened where he said basically that the next third world country will be the US.  He KNEW it back then.  The big, big player in the formation of the European Union, worked for the United Nations and all that.  He said that the next boat people will be people leaving the US looking for work abroad.  But it’s actually happening elsewhere BEFORE it hits the US.)

 

BRITAIN is facing a mass exodus of people looking to escape the crime and grime of modern living.  (A:  It’s also to escape this multi-culturalism because they don’t know what culture is anymore; they’re so confused by propaganda from the government.)

 

The country’s biggest foreign visa consultancy firm has revealed that applications have soared in the last seven months by 80 per cent to almost 4,000 a week. Ten years ago the figure was just 300 a week.

 

Most people are relocating within the Commonwealth – in Australia, Canada and South Africa. They are almost all young professionals and skilled workers aged 20-40.

 

And many cite their reason for wanting to quit as immigration to these shores – and the burden it is placing on their communities and local authorities. (A:  So they are blaming immigration.)  The dearth of good schools, spiralling house prices, rising crime and tax increases are also driving people away.

 

Obtaining a visa to live abroad can cost as little as £1,500 for the right candidates. Plumbers, electricians, construction workers and doctors are famously in demand. The only obstruction to emigration from the UK is a criminal record, poor health, advancing age and being a “third country national”.  (A:  Then it goes through different episodes of different people and so on.)

 

“Ironically, one of the main reasons for leaving is the overstretch of services (A:  You can’t get services in Britain because they all cater to the immigrants coming IN to Britain.) due to increasing immigration into the UK. People are looking for the better standard of living offered by other countries, as even the most idyllic villages in Britain are under pressure from rising populations.  (A:  And it’s due to immigration.)

 

What’s even more ironic… A few weeks ago I mentioned – maybe a couple of weeks ago I mentioned – how Tony Blair and his right hand man had planned to change the face of Britain FOREVER by massively upping the quotas of immigrants into Britain… to destroy the culture, any vestige of culture.  That’s imperative to bring in this new world order.  I’ve told people before, YOU CAN’T PLEASE THEM at the top.  Britain has been trying to cut back their population.  The average family in Britain doesn’t have more than about 1 child per family.  They’ve done all the ‘right’ things and then Maggie Thatcher said when she opened the floodgates to immigration, mainly from India at that time.  She says, ‘We need immigration; there’s not enough getting born here to pay off the national debts.’  That was the reason that was given.  So you do all the right things to please them.  You can not please them at the top and I hope all of you politically correct people out there are listening to me now.  You can’t please them at the top.  They are going to come after you eventually with something else, you see. 

 

SECRET PLOT TO LET 50 MILLION AFRICAN

 WORKERS INTO EU

Saturday October 11, 2008  /  By Nick Fagge in Mali  /  The Daily Express

 

MORE than 50 million African workers are to be invited to Europe in a far-reaching secretive migration deal, the Daily Express can reveal today. 

 

A controversial taxpayer-funded (A:  We always pay for our own demise.) “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.  (A:  The European Union.)

 

Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe.  (A:  See it’s not enough people getting born, because they’ve been good little two-shoes and obeying their governments.)

 

The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.  (A:  So they are using the SAME excuse as Thatcher gave.  What they are not mentioning here is the incredible debt that was also paid to pay off the bankers.)

 

It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming decades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age. 

 

“Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.” 

 

The report, by French MEP Francoise Castex, calls for immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits.  (A:  That’s why people are moving out of the UK, they can’t get access to these things because there is a priority list.  Amazing eh?)

 

Now I’ll go to Aiden Hunter in British Columbia.  Are you there Aiden?

 

Aiden:  My Dad says hi.  I’m son of Alex Hunter and I’m 12 years old.  I would like to talk to you about Byron Pryor.  He’s been put a mental hospital, Waterford Institution.  Because when he was young his sister was raped by a judge, Alex Hickman.  She was impregnated and he’s in the mental hospital because of that and they are saying it didn’t happen.  He was supposed to get out last Monday, last month, and he didn’t.  He wasn’t getting out because he didn’t say that didn’t happen.  Like they are just twisting what they said to his wife Audrey around and to him. 

 

Alan:  I know there was a big deal out in British Columbia.  A few years ago there was a report in the papers there where there was a pedophile ring consisting of judges and they were getting the children delivered to them by the guy who was put in charge of the social services for children’s commission.  That’s who was supplying them with children.  Hold on, I’ll be back after this break.

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to Aiden from British Columbia.  Are you there Aiden?

 

Aiden:  Okay, just to get to the point.  Chief Justice Alex Hickman won’t supply DNA to see if Byron’s niece is his child.  Instead of letting Byron out, they are holding Byron indefinitely until he says it didn’t happen.  So that’s like all kids are like unsafe now because… right?

 

Alan:  There are different laws for different peoples in different categories.  When it comes to judges, they are sort of above it all; they are kind of God-like.  That’s why they wear those black capes and wear wigs.  So that’s the way it is.  That’s real life and when it comes to keeping them safe… You see, they can not be tried by common people.  They must be tried by THEIR peer group.  So that will never end up in a court of law with a judge as the defendant; it won’t happen.  That’s the reality of life.

 

Aiden:  I’ve been watching my Dad suffer for 11 ¼ years now.  He made the Canadian Collation of the Walking Wounded.  He had a radio show; it was called Canadian Collation of the Walking Wounded Uncensored Radio.  It started on November 11th.  Then the next day he was supposed to go on the air, he didn’t get any calls from his partner in Victoria here.  They left 5 messages on our voice message machine and the phone didn’t ring at all.  That’s how he got off the show, he couldn’t do it anymore.  We really love your show.  Your show is really good. 

 

Alan:  I tell you, we should really be glad and grateful to the US.  The USA doesn’t know it.  They don’t know it.  This is getting broadcast out of the USA because you can not do this kind of stuff in Canada or any of the British Commonwealth countries because we’re under tyranny.  We’ve always been under tyranny.  There is no such thing as free speech.  You have authorized speech under the guise of free speech on regular media but you don’t really have any free speech in Canada whatsoever.  So you’re quite right.  But the US, they’re going to start to lose it and they’d better start really, really fighting for it because when they lose the right to free speech, even if it’s opinions you don’t like, you’ve got to accept it all because it’s the only way you can get YOUR voice out there too.  When it’s taken away from you, you’re under tyranny.  Thanks for calling, Aiden. 

 

Lorilee, maybe I can get you tomorrow.  I hear the music coming in now.  I hope the US really, truly hang on to their guns, so to speak, because they are the last country to go down and they are already going down through the cultural attacks all around them and within them and through laws and regulations.  Once it’s gone, the whole world is under the big new world totalitarian boot. 

 

From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

"Carbon ration account for all proposed by Environment Agency" by Ben Webster (timesonline.co.uk) - Nov. 9, 2009.

"Environment boss wants to put carbon tax on driving, heating and holidays" by Daniel Martin (dailymail.co.uk) - Nov. 9, 2009.

"How police are making criminals of the over-40s: Target culture fuels rise in first-time convictions for middle aged" by James Slack (dailymail.co.uk) - Oct. 27, 2009.

"Grandfather arrested at dawn, DNA-tested and held in a police cell for SIX hours for swearing once at council official" (dailymail.co.uk) - Nov. 10, 2009.

"4,000 PEOPLE A WEEK TRYING TO LEAVE UK" by Michael Knapp (dailyexpress.co.uk) - Aug. 5, 2007.

"SECRET PLOT TO LET 50MILLION AFRICAN WORKERS INTO EU" by Nick Fagge (express.co.uk) - October 11, 2008.

 

 

Transcribed by Diana