Sept. 8, 2009 (#403)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 8, 2009:
Recycling Trash-ers of Body Snatchers:
"We Enjoy Scary Movies, Like to Scream,
Yet We're in Scary Reality, People Turning Green,
We're Supposed to Let Go, Nature's Will be Done,
In Homogenization is Understanding, All is One,
Upon Awakening, Your Spouse, Like in a Dream,
Will Seem a Little Different, Skin a Tinge of Green,
She'll Fawn over Shrubbery, Still Polite to You,
You'll Notice Her Shallow Breathing, Cutting Back on CO2,
Then Friends and Neighbours, Something Different is Seen,
One by One They're Taken Over, Yes They've All Gone Green"
© Alan Watt Sept. 8, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 8, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September the 8th 2009. Newcomers look in to cuttingthroughthematrix.com webs site and scroll down that front page, bookmark all the other sites I have up there because once and a while - and itís becoming more frequent - one of the main servers goes down or it doesnít let me upload because they wonít increase the bandwidth although itís supposed to do it automatically. That happens almost weekly now. So bookmark those. Youíve got a lot to choose from [listed above]. alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, this is the European site which has all of the same audios as the rest but it has a lot of written transcripts for download and print up, written in the various languages of Europe. So itís a pretty handy one to have. Plus, if you try these other sites youíll often find you can get right through. If you find the downloads sticking after a show, itís because thereís too many people going in to the .com site at the same time.
Remember too, that you bring me to you. You, the listener, bring me to you. I donít get paid by advertisers. Thatís generally how hosts get paid. The advertising on the show pays their fees directly to the station RBN to pay for their time and their equipment and their staff and so on. So itís up to you the listener to keep me going. You can do it by buying that which I have for sale on my site, my books and disks. Or you can donate to me. In the US and Canada, personal check is good. In the US, you can also send international postal money order, from your post office. Outside the Americas, you can use Western Union and Money Gram. PayPal can be used by everyone. Western Union is expensive but it still gets through. Money Gram is a bit cheaper. You can order through those ways as well. For those who get disks burned of the shows and passed to them because they donít have computers and theyíre burned by those who do, then you can write to me at [listed above] and that will get to me.
You wouldnít believe how things go here. Thereís not a day passes without a crisis of some kind or another. As I mentioned there at the beginning, even the main servers like Yahoo, 3 or 4 times now, have stopped me from uploading. All you get is disk space problem. Itís supposed to be automatic and unlimited that Iím paying for. I shouldnít have to call them to tell them that I canít upload. When you get these setbacks that happen almost every night in one way or another, youíre up until 2, 3 in the morningÖ or more. Every darn night itís something else. Those of you who have been listening for a little while have probably known that Iíve mentioned Xplornet - Xplornet is the satellite service that I use because Iím in the rural regions - and how they give you problems. When you first sign on, your first 2 months is good, not-bad speed. Not to what they claim, but itís not bad at all. Then, once thatís in, youíre locked in your payment plan, then they kick in with their fair use policy. Iím going to explain what happened last night because it was quite the thing. I was up until about 2 in the morning with it, 3 in the morning. Iíll tell you how I got the run around from them. Back with more after these messages.
This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Just giving you an idea of problems that are daily hereÖ daily. No one in their right mind would do what Iím doing here. Itís crazy. Absolutely crazy. Itís one thing after another. Iíve mentioned before, if youíre doing the right thing, things happen to you. Things will happen to you. The real world works really differently from the movies. A lot can be done by the old boysí network where someone in some government capacity even, can give the nod and the wink to a friend, an old school chum, at the head of a big company that I happen to be using and they can give you a lot of trouble. Like you canít upload to your sites or suddenly, like what happened - the very night I mentioned on the air Xplornet and the problems I was having - that very night, the satellite cut off completely. That was on August the 12th. That very night at 9pm, right at the very end of the show, off it went. I had bad speed right up until then but it was dead.
So I talked to different people at Xplornet and they had me on the phone for hours explaining to me that it could be your dish needing realigning, and it could be this and it could be that. Try this, try that. You go through this rigmarole with them. So eventually, I had to fork out the cash, get a guy to come here and that was a joke in itself. The woman at Xplornet was looking for someone to come here, when I was writing down the names it suddenly dawned on me, these guys that would come to fix it were from Alberta; Iím in Ontario. I thought boy that will cost me some money there wonít it. So I said no, Sudburyís not far; thereís people in Sudbury. I phoned someone myself and got them out here. Anyway, after lightening my wallet incredibly for the replacement of parts that Iím sure it didnít even need - this is what they do to a lot of people Iím sure - then it starts to work, but no real improvement in the speed. Just over the last week or so, itís gotten worse and worse. Iím restarting it 10 times. When youíre uploading it in a nightís 3 hours, 10 times to restart it.
Last night, I got a hold of a nice girl whoís called MeganÖ who talked like a bureaucrat. They all talk like bureaucrats because of their official policy on how to respond to customers, which is always vaguely. Thatís definite, vague, be vague. I was trying to find out what happened and I said, look this thing just got fixed, supposedly, and now I canít upload. She says itís because youíve tripped the fair use policy. Now youíre paying about $100 a month to use this thing. This only gets used to upload at night and thatís it. I asked her to explain whatís the limit for fair use policy? She couldnít tell me. I asked her if there was anyone there who could and no one could tell me. So, itís arbitrary, you see. In other words, theyíll pick on certain people, obviously, since thereís new customers coming in all the time. Because they have to purchase their bandwidth from Hughes Satellite Company, the big military-industrial boys, then obviously, once theyíve got enough people in, they want more customers at the same time, they have to cut back your bandwidth.
In other words, itís a rubber band policy. It depends how many people theyíre bringing in new and sharing the bandwidth with. Then theyíll cut you back if youíre an old time customer and you havenít said too much in the complaint department. I says to her, this is ridiculous; this has been going on for over 2 years. I says, whoís your boss and she told me. I says well, I invite your boss to come on the radio show so that he can tell me and all the listeners, potential customers maybe, and customers. I know that Xplornet goes all the way from Alaska to way down in California, and a lot of people in New York State in the rural areas have it too. A lot of the listeners tell me this. Iím always getting asked what to use, to advise them on getting, if they want something a bit higher than dial-up. I invited the boss on this show to explain this rubber band policy that is so vague that no one seems to understand it at all. The problem is Iím fixed in. I wonít get an answer obviously, but theyíve got me fixed in on a computer. As soon as I use a certain amount of bytes, bang, they just cut me right off.
This is like the bureaucratic system of socialism. Itís so interesting the corporations work exactly the same way as governments and bureaucracies with the same kind of people who deal with the public. They have those eyes, theyíre kind of like lobsters. Thereís just no expression there as they reel out their formulas to you and go around in circles with you. Literally, they go around in circles. Itís no coincidence that Quigley said that the new world system, the new feudal system theyíre bringing in will be run by corporations. Really, corporations ARE - and this is taught in economics - big corporations now have bureaucracies, just like government, just the same as government. They have the big stick and thatís how they train you.
So you can PAY for Xplornet. They like you to pay for it. In fact, they take it out of your bank every month. You never get a receipt. Iíve got one in 2 years and that was just a fluke, I think; it came out of nowhere by email, and that was it. However, they want you to pay for it and they want to take your money for it. They just donít want you to USE it. Thatís not a bad deal for them is it? Just donít use it. Hereís what they told me too. Megan was awful good when she says, if you do want to use it, you can use it in the middle of the night, up until 5 am. I thought, boy, this is great. Whereís all this stuff on their contract when you join up with the darn thing? Youíve got to be an insomniac to use Xplornet?
Itís incredibleÖ what people get away with and corporations get away with. Then again, as I say, how many other people are they doing this with? OR, is it the old boysí network saying so-and-so is a problem? Iíll keep mentioning this problem until they take me off their automatic cut-me-back list. Iíll keep mentioning it because at least Iím doing my duty in telling potential customers whatís going on with meÖ and it will happen with them too unless they can get it in writing they will not be cut back. Unless they can get it in writing to tell them exactly how much bandwidth they can use a month. Thereís not even a site you can go in to, to find out. Thereís nothing. Itís all this vague mystery. Give us your money and letís just hope.
Can you imagine how many people this has happened to? Iíve looked into the Xplornet complaints. Thereís a site out there where people have had bad experiences with them. Thereís so many of them and they all say the same thing. They get the guys out umpteen times to fix their satellite and they pay $200-300 a time for this kind of stuff, just to get it trained in again, only to find out that Xplornet is doing it. See, Xplornet wonít tell you. Iím surprised Megan slipped up last night and actually told me that they had me on this rollback thing. Everybody else Iíve spoken to there wouldnít mention that at all. They want to keep your money. They want to make you think itís your problem and itís your equipment. Isnít that called lying? Isnít that called LYING to the public?
Thereís got to be some law that itís under, the business bureaus and so on, to deal with this. As I say, thereís nothing thereÖ thereís nothing there explaining their fair use policy when you sign on. Iím not using what I would call a lot of bandwidth. Iím not putting videos up there every day like a lot of people do. So if Xplornetís listening in, wait and see what happens tonight. The last time I mentioned this, they cut me off that very night and then blamed my satellite for it, my dish. That lightened my wallet a good bit, as you remember, only to find out, yep, thanks Megan. At least she told me itís on automatic. Last night at 8:18 pm, she says, Iíd breached my limit, as they call it, breached your limit. Iíd only been on 15 minutes. 15 minutes and my limit was breached. Amazing, eh? So there you go. Be careful out there. Be careful because thereís an awful lot of this going on, as we all know. Having got that beef over, but this tells you where your time goes. Youíre up until 2, 3 in the morning, every night, with this kind of stuffÖ either with the servers or the satellite guys.
Just going over the media today. I had one article there where there was a British scientist, who was a greenie of course. Theyíre all getting their paychecks from the green environment. Heís asked for religious leaders to tackle climate change by basically telling their congregations to be all for it. Interesting too, you knowÖ this is the President of the British Science Association, Lord May. Lord May. And he May indeed say whatever he wants. It saysÖ
Leading scientist calls on religious leaders to tackle climate change
President of the British Science Association, Lord May, says
faith groups could lead policing of social behaviour
(Alan: FAITH GROUPS policing of social behavior!)
guardian.co.uk Science Web / British Science Festival 2009
Iíve said before, if you think Nazism was bad - national socialism or communism, which is international socialism - you ainít seen nothing yet as to whatís coming down the pike. I know the listeners here are far better educated than the general public who havenít a clue. They adapt into everything. Itís going to get a lot, lot worse. Weíre seeing it all manifest now as SERVICES then become AUTHORITIES in every single area. Youíre all supposed to just Ďgo greení. Now they want all the religious groups to go green as well, but they also want them to POLICE THE BEHAVIOR of their congregations. Everybody spying on each other to see if theyíre praying to Jesus and going green enough at the same time. Maybe theyíll have to pay some extra polluting fee for lighting the candles at mass, you know, that carbon comes off. Do you know much energy goes in to creating that candle as well? This is the FARCE of this nightmare called the new world order and itís just starting to really manifest. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. Iím Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. That article from the British Lord May that wants to have the ministers teaching the congregations how to police themselves for social behavior, are they going green enough and all the rest of it, itís part of the British Science Festival write-up in the Guardian.co.uk. Can you image that? Everybody is going green. Itís amazing. I donít know if youíve ever seen the movie, it was Invasion of the Body Snatchers? Where in the middle of the night, I donít know how they got there, but these alien pods came. They were like long green beans. They would copy the people who were sleeping. Each pod would create a replica of them that would look just like the original person. Then the original person, I guess, was just sucked up or something. Theyíd disappear. Theyíd have the same traits, the same habits but there was just something different about them. Eventually, there was only a few people left who had not gone green. The greenies have a couple of people trapped in a kitchen and say, join us, JOIN US, join usÖ all those worries and all those fears you have will be over; youíll understand everything once you go green.
Thatís just what itís like isnít it? Be one; be one with us. Go green. One day, youíll wake up and your spouse will be all green right next to you in the bed with a withered pod on the other side of the bed. Thatís where they came from. Theyíve gone green. Everybodyís gone green. Iím telling you, at least you can laugh about this because itís serious business. This is to be the big stick, the sustainability stuff, to change our ENTIRE behavior so that a few, A FEW can rule the world the way their ancestors planned it to be. Thatís exactly what it isÖ and this is the excuse theyíve come up with. Itís getting taught as FACT. Thereís no facts about it. Even the global warming has faded into climate change and so on and so on, but theyíve got what they wanted. And they wonít change, Iím telling you. They will not change their agenda come hell or high water. They ainít going to change it because everything banks on us giving up every possible right, over a period of time, incremental Fabian style until we emerge into a new system. We wonít even think of ourselves as slaves. Only a few of us will know. The rest, of course, will adapt. They just adapt into it without thinking. Thatís the way it really, really is.
Iíve talked before about the United Nations, the big FRONT organization that was set up to bring ALL of this INÖ ALL OF THIS IN. It was set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs/ Council on Foreign Relations. Itís a FRONT organization to bring in a form of INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM. Which really means a bureaucratic elite, MASSIVE bureaucratic elite running all the peasantry down below micromanaging their lives, right down to the last detail, even if youíve been the first detail, thatís if youíre even going to be conceivedÖ by law. Iím not kidding you. Every law thatís passed on housing and greening and can you sell your house, thatís coming up shortly. Can you sell your house because it isnít green enough; itís not insulated enough; it doesnít have the latest yada, yada, ya until youíll all be walking away from your homes. Thatís coming up too. Thatís part of it. Thatís part of Agenda 21. Agenda 21 from the United NationsÖ that no newscaster will ever go through with you. Just like no newscaster will go through the NAFTA deal for the unification of the Americas. Itís not their job to tell you the truth. They tell you little things about sports and stuff like that, and what happens in Hollywood. Thatís their jobÖ to keep you off the main topics.
This article here is from The Telegraph.
UN wants new global currency to replace dollar
The dollar should be replaced with a global currency, the United Nations has said, proposing the biggest overhaul of the world's monetary system
since the Second World War.
By Edmund Conway, Economics Editor / 7 Sep 2009
A number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency. In a radical report, the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (A: UNCTAD, UNC TAD. I guess thatís uncle. Uncle TAD. Theyíre changing it a little bit, thatís the TAD bit.) has said the system of currencies and capital rules which binds the world economy is not working properly (A: At least theyíve noticed.), and was largely responsible for the financial and economic crises. (A: Was it really? Thatís why it was eh? the system of currencies and capital rulesÖ thatís what caused the crisis. It wasnít greedy bankers and Ponzi schemes was it? HmmÖ Thatís what it said in the newspapers at the timeÖ all Ponzi schemes, big bubbles. Nothing to do with what kind of currency youíre using. But what does reality have to do with the United Nations?)
It added that the present system, under which the dollar acts as the world's reserve currency, should be subject to a wholesale reconsideration.
Although a number of countries, including China and Russia, have suggested replacing the dollar as the world's reserve currency, the UNCTAD report is the first time a major multinational institution has posited such a suggestion. (A: In other words, everyoneís ganging up on the US.)
In essence, the report calls for a new Bretton Woods-style system of managed international exchange rates, meaning central banks would be forced to intervene and either support or push down their currencies depending on how the rest of the world economy is behaving.
The proposals would also imply that surplus nations such as China and Germany should stimulate their economies further in order to cut their own imbalances, rather than, as in the present system, deficit nations such as the UK and US having to take the main burden of readjustment. (A: Itís EQUAL POVERTY, is what theyíre advocating. Back with more after this break.)
This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Reading an article from The Telegraph to do with replacing the dollar. It says hereÖ
"Replacing the dollar with an artificial currency (A: What is the dollar?) would solve some of the problems related to the potential of countries running large deficits and would help stability," said Detlef Kotte, one of the report's authors. "But you will also need a system of managed exchange rates. Countries should keep real exchange rates [adjusted for inflation] stable. Central banks would have to intervene and if not they would have to be told to do so by a multilateral institution such as the International Monetary Fund." (A: I told you before, that the International Monetary Fund was DESIGNED to take over and push this idea of The World Bank and be, basically, the intermediary for the world bank for the whole planet. This is it getting risen up. Every part of the UN is being risen up to its proper place now. Thatís what it was designed to be as the MASTER of the world, at least the front-man master of the planet.)
The proposals, included in UNCTAD's annual Trade and Development Report, amount to the most radical suggestions for redesigning the global monetary system.
Although many economists have pointed out that the economic crisis owed more to the malfunctioning of the post-Bretton Woods system, until now no major institution, including the G20, has come up with an alternative.
Weíre all global and theyíll still want the US to pay the lionís share across the planet FOR the United Nations regardless of the currency. Thatís how they look upon the tax payer of the US, as just one big, endless pit, money pit for their massive bureaucracies at the United Nations. And they are MASSIVE... with big, fat pension plans and pay checks and so on. Everything in the world has always been run on corruption no matter what face they put on, itís always corruption behind it. Always UNDER the face of altruism and stuff like that. Quite something.
You know all this stuff about injections and inoculations and mandatory this and mandatory that and all the rest of it? This system where the proper place of medicine is to get risen up to its powerful status where they can ORDER the public to do things. Thatís what they wrote about when they first created the United Nations and even before when they did their little baby precursor, the League of Nations. They said, it would be risen up to an authority. And here it comes. Theyíre injecting all kinds of this stuff into children on behalf of big pharma. Itís amazing when you follow whoís who in pharma to find out that they worked IN government in certain departments where they put bills forward. Then they go back into big pharma again and they get all the orders coming in from government, because they set it up in the first place. Everything is totally corrupt. TOTALLY CORRUPT. The higher up you go, the more corrupt it is. People donít want to believe that. They want to believe the TV version or the stuff they get on the soaps or the movies. They want to believe that. That somehow the higher up they go, the more altruistic and sincere and virtuous is the person. What a great con that is to make us all want to believe thatÖ because the opposite is always true. The opposite is ALWAYS TRUE.
This article here is from Times Online. Youíve all heard about Gardasil and how they were pushing it on the young girls and so on. It says, the right after school activities are your childís first branding moment. Then you scroll down and it saysÖ
Question a doctor and lose your child
Ashleigh Cave (A: this young girl.) lost the use of her legs (A: paralyzed) after a vaccination
From The Sunday Times September 6, 2009 / Daniel Foggo
PARENTS are being threatened with having their children taken into care after questioning doctorsí diagnoses or objecting to their medical care.
John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP, who campaigns to stop injustices in the family court, said: ďVery often care proceedings are used as retaliation by local authorities against Ďuppityí people who question the system.Ē (A: For those who live outside of Britain, they canít really imagine that, although youíre seeing the same kind of things manifest everywhere else, in the US, Canada and so on. Britain has always been run by this elite - itís called The Establishment - but itís run on a socialistic type manner for all those on the bottom. If you were standing in a line for something, and you were the only person to question, why is this line taking so longÖ cameras, everything would be looking upon YOU, oh, youíd broken a taboo, you asked a question. Youíre supposed to just behave and do what youíre told. Iím not kidding. Iím not kidding. Thatís what people notice when they go to Britain, how placid they are in line-ups and queues and all the rest of it. Itís because theyíve been trained that theyíre all the same. Youíre really nothing, you see. So just stand there as a nothing and maybe youíll get your turn eventually. Uppity people, they call them; those who complain.)
Cases are emerging across the UK: (A: Cases of retaliation by local authorities.)
The mother of a 13-year-old girl who became partly paralysed after being given a cervical cancer vaccination (A: Thatís Gardasil.) says social workers have told her the child may be removed if she (the mother) continues to link her condition with the vaccination. (A: Now itís IN the possible side-effects of the vaccination: paralysis, etc., but donít dare mention it.)
A couple had all six of their children removed from their care after they disputed the necessity of an invasive medical test on their eldest daughter. Doctors, who suspected she might have had a blood disease, called for social services to obtain an emergency protection order, although it was subsequently confirmed that she was not suffering from the condition. The parents were still considered unstable, and all their children were taken from them. (A: If you question anything, ha, thatís it. The parents just happen to be right in this but it doesnít make any difference.)
A single mother whose teenage son is terminally ill and confined to a wheelchair has been told he is to become the subject of a care order after she complained that her local authorityís failure to provide bathroom facilities for him has left her struggling to maintain sanitary standards.
In the first of those cases, Ashleigh Cave (A: This is the one with Gardasil.), 13, from Liverpool, began experiencing severe headaches and dizziness half an hour after being inoculated last October with Cervarix (A: Which is the same as Gardasil.), which (A: MAY, I should put MAY in there because it hasnít been proven) guards against girls contracting the human papilloma virus. (A: I hate how they word things. Itís supposed to guard against 2 or 3 of ALL the varieties of themÖ SUPPOSED to.)
The schoolgirl was soon collapsing repeatedly; she lost the use of her legs and was admitted to Alder Hey childrenís hospital. Nearly 11 months later she is still in hospital and is unable to stand or walk unaided. Her mother, Cheryl, has now been told that doctors believe her condition must be psychosomatic. (A: Itís all in your head. Itís all in your head that you had seizures and fell paralyzed after that shot. Even though itís possible as a side effect down there, you see. Got to protect big pharma. Got to protect the doctors. They donít like lawsuits. They donít like that. So what do they do? They get local authorities to confiscate your children. End of problem. Simple isnít it?)
ďThe hospital brought in social workers from the local authority who have told me they are considering putting Ashleigh on an at-risk register,Ē Cheryl Cave said. She is convinced her daughterís paralysis was caused by the vaccination.
Cave said that a social worker from Sefton council said she suspected her of having Munchausenís syndrome by proxy (A: They love to read this stuffÖ You know, a social worker.) or factitious illness syndrome ó controversial conditions in which mothers are said to attribute illnesses falsely to their children in order to gain attention. (A: I guess thatís a good way of getting attention, your daughter goes paralyzed eh? You put a few amazing little words out there, Munchausenís syndrome by proxy, and suddenly every social worker is, Ďthatís probably what theyíve ALL got; the whole populationís got it.í Thatís what happens with the people, you know. It goes through them like a fad for a while.)
Cave said: ďThe social worker said I should stop believing the injection has anything to do with Ashleighís condition because I am putting my thoughts on to her and stopping her getting well. (A: Itís all her mumís fault. It wasnít pharma. I wasnít a doctor with the inoculation. No. No. No.)
ďSince Ashleigh was in hospital she has become incontinent and had double kidney infections and chest infections. Have I made all these up?Ē (A: You see. Thatís, again, standard what comes down with paralysis and so on, you end up with that.)
In the third of these cases, Melvilina Gavin-Langleyís 16-year-old son Omar is terminally ill with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and restricted to a wheelchair.
His mother is embroiled in a legal dispute with Birmingham city council over a partly completed extension intended to provide Omar with easy access to a bathroom.
Gavin-Langley, 49, who wants the extension rebuilt because she says it was designed in a way that was dangerous and obstructed access to sewers, said: ďI have had to carry Omar upstairs to bathe him but it was risking dislocating his shoulders and also I got a hernia from all the lifting.
ďI told the council I could no longer lift Omar across my back.
ďThey then turned that around and said I had said I could no longer care for my son. (A: So she complained about the fact the she could no longer lift the guy on her back and so they took the son away.) They say they have to put him into care because his hair has not been washed and heís not getting a bath. They have just threatened me with this because they donít like me taking legal action against them.Ē (A: Thatís a fact. They donít. They really donít because these authorities are just like the Soviet system. Theyíre copied on the Soviet system and they DO retaliateÖ BIG TIME. This is all through our system now. All these services are now AUTHORITIES. Even though theyíre all paid by the tax payer, weíre POST democratic. Theyíre not responsible to YOU. Thatís what the Club of Rome said, democracy was too cumbersome. They had to get rid of it so they can get their agendas through. Itís all out in the open now, coming down fast.)
Thereís Maggie from Texas on the line. Iíll see if I can grab her. Are you there Maggie?
Maggie: Yes. Good evening, Alan. I was just wondering whether you believe that there might be any way to fight the, letís say, the illuminatesÖ fight them by using their refusal ever to deviate from the game plan against us? I know that there are martial arts systems in which you use the enemyís strengths against them. I wondered if you can see any counter part here. What is your take on that?
Alan: The counter part is really easy but wonít happen. I wonít happen. Itís very easy because everythingÖ We have this idea in our head that government, certainly it is big, but you understand the population is an awful, awful, awful lot bigger. All it takes is for the people to say NO. On any particular issue, they all say NO. Government, no matter how ridiculous the laws and legislation they put through, need our cooperation to go along with those laws. They really need us to consent to it. We consent by saying nothing. That is a legal fact that SILENCE IS CONSENT. Because of that, they go ahead. Then they start using those laws on people as laws. We could bring the country to a standstill on any issueÖ if enough people just said NO, THATíS IT; TODAY IíM NOT GOING UP TO WORK; TODAY IíM NOT DOING THIS; TODAY IíM NOT DOING THAT. Whatever it was. And youíll get attention very quickly. Theyíd have to ask you what you wanted. For the first time ever, theyíd have to ask YOU what YOU wanted. But weíve been trained since about 1960 onwards, gradually, through being happy, having fun, credit cards and playing, NOT to be involved in politics AT ALL and actually to leave it to what we think are experts. Very quietly, at first, this came in. Gradually we sort of accepted it without really thinking it through consciously. Thatís how most folk are today. They just accept that somehow governments are super powerful, special people up there, and weíre out of the picture. We just do what weíre told now. We have been trained just to do what weíre told. This is the dream of totalitariansÖ which is manifesting right now. If people, for instance, when they put the gas prices out of sight, if people just stopped going to work for one or two days, stop filling up on gas, across a country, whatÖ are they going to arrest ALL of you? They canít do it. Itís the same with food too. The GMO and all the other things theyíre doing and mass inoculations, if the folk just all said NO. What are they going to do? Arrest whole nations? How could they do it? Impossible. Government, really, is pretty small. Itís the image we have in our minds and thatís all government is, remember, an idea. Government is like money. Itís an IDEA. In our minds it seems so colossal because of the constant, daily, repetition of news and government; it seems massively huge, but it isnít. The only huge thing is the salaries and all the taxes they take off you. In reality, it isnít a huge thing. What could they do if enough people, in a state even, in one state, or a couple of states, said NO? Just like Gandhi, NO. NOPE. They canít lock you all up. Itís impossible to lock you all upÖ for saying no.
Maggie: You seem to be saying that wonít happen and yet youíre out here educating people every night so I hope you donít mean that.
Alan: You will find there will be groups who will do it. The elite have divided and conquered, divided and conquered down to a micro level. They have not only the genders split now, they have micro gender in-betweens all split. Everybodyís split with everybody else and theyíre all after their own little thing because they all belong to different groups that have been laid on for them go joinÖ but they donít stand together collectively as humanity and say ENOUGH. The elite know this. When you look back at the massive demonstrations there were during the 70s and 80s, all across the world against the atomic bomb and youíd have families in the streets there, their children would be with them, there was no banging the drums and a carnival-like atmosphere. They just had their posters. Ordinary folk with families, thousands and thousands of them, protesting about certain things and that had an image that stuck with you. What happened after 9/11? They just vanished.
Maggie: After 9/11 is when it vanished? Or 9/11 was the incident that showed it no longer existed?
Alan: Thatís right. It showed it no longer existed. Then too, government did come down on protests of all kinds. Weíve seen it for the previous G20 meetings when they came down really hard on anyone who protested against global governance. In fact, thatís what Kissinger said in his speech, I think it was in France or Germany, when they asked him to define from Americaís standards what a terrorist is.† He said, itís anyone whoís against the new international, global order. Thatís what he said. Theyíre going to stand no nonsense, in other words. However, I donít care if they turned up the military, or whoever. If you had enough people, most of the people stand up and say, enough is enough, weíre not complyingÖ What are they going to do? Arrest the whole of the population? Whoís going to arrest the population? How could they even try and do it? You canít do it. Thatís really the power that we DO have if we want to take it. Say NO, ENOUGH!
Maggie: Thank you Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Just before I go I should mention Agenda 21. Everyone goes along without thinking as to how all these proposals and laws came into being. You have to go back in time to the 90s really when it came out into the open, at least in certain magazines and in certain quarters. Agenda 21, the United Nationís plan for your sustainable community. YOUR sustainable community. Itís commutarianism, as Bush Sr. called it, or collectivism, as the Club of Rome called it. This is by Berit Kjos. Iíve mentioned this before and I read off it before, maybe about a year ago. This is from 1998. Thereís a quote here from Maurice Strong, opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development. Remember, he is the Rockefeller boy and the United Nations boy.
The U.N. Plan for Your "Sustainable" Community
By Berit Kjos - 1998
"...current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat (A: Thatís why itís all going vegetarian, by the way. It was decided by these boys way above you.) intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable. (A: You can tell youíre going to get knocked out of suburbs and placed into the cities.) A shift is necessary, which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system (A: Thatís the global system.), including the United Nations..." (A: Thatís what he said.)  Maurice Strong, opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development
Note: This global contract binds all nations and spreading regions to the collective vision of "sustainable development." They must commit to pursue the three E's of "sustainability": Environment, Economy and Equity referring to the UN blueprint for environmental regulations, economic regulations, and social equity.
Agenda 21, the UN blueprint for global transformation, sounds good to many well meaning people. Drafted for the purpose of creating "sustainable societies", it has been welcomed by nations around the world. Political, cultural, and media leaders have embraced its alluring visions of social justice and a healthy planet. They hide the lies behind its doomsday scenarios and fraudulent science. Relatively few consider the contrary facts and colossal costs.
After all, what could be wrong with preserving resources for the next generation? Why not limit consumption and reduce energy use? Why not abolish poverty and establish a global welfare system to train parents, monitor intolerance, and meet all our needs? Why not save the planet by trading cars for bikes, an open market for "self-sustaining communities," and single dwellings for dense "human settlements" (located on transit lines) where everyone would dialogue, share common ground, and be equal?
The answer is simple. Marxist economics has never worked. Socialism produces poverty, not prosperity. Collectivism creates oppression, not freedom. Trusting environmental "scientists" who depend on government funding and must produce politically useful "information" will lead to economic and social disaster.
Iíll put this link up on my web site at the end of tonightís show. Thatís if Xplornet will let me load up anything to the net. Weíll see.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
scientist calls on religious leaders to tackle climate change - President of the
British Science Association, Lord May, says faith groups could lead policing of
social behaviour" by Ian Sample (guardian.co.uk) - Sept. 7, 2009.
"UN wants new global currency to replace dollar" by Edmund Conway (telegraph.co.uk) - Sept. 7, 2009.
"Question a doctor and lose your child" by Daniel Foggo, The Times - Sept. 6, 2009.
"Agenda 21: The U.N. Plan for Your "Sustainable" Community" by Berit Kjos (crossroad.to) - 1998.
Transcribed by Diana