Aug. 27, 2009 (#395)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 27, 2009:
Thoughtful Hesitation before Vaccination:
"The Great Sir Macfarlane Burnet,
Under the Honors, Don't Forget,
Loved Darwin's Elitism and H.G. Wells,
Absorbed by Biowarfare and Living Hells,
Advocated Infecting Each Mass Population
While He was Working on Mass Vaccination,
And Out of This 'Genius's' Head Pops
Various Diseases to Destroy All Crops,
The Ecologists' Depopulation Plan
Has Many Burnets, Each One Their Man"
© Alan Watt Aug. 27, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 27, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 27th 2009. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Bookmark the other sites on that front page, scroll down, for future use [listed above]. Sometimes the main servers go down or you might find it hard to download and to get through if you just use the .com site alone. Thousands go into that site at the same time every night and every morning about the same time. So if you use these other sites you might get through easier. alanwattsentientsentinel.eu that’s the European site. It has all the audios too, plus it has written transcripts of some of the talks that I’ve give in the different languages of Europe.
I thank the people who have donated yesterday. There’s two or three new people came in as well. So please keep it coming. There’s not many people, really, who are willing these days to put their money forward. I will be putting up a PayPal button for automatic monthly donations. I didn’t even know I could do that. Apparently that’s what many of them do. That way it’s taken automatically and I won’t have to keep asking every month or two months for donations. For those who simply get the disks burned and passed to them to play in their CD players, you can write to me at [listed above].
I try to give the people a sort of history of a system that’s been going on for a few hundred years but it really took up speed in the late 1800s. Definitely took off in the early 1900s. According to Professor Carroll Quigley, this particular system or organization which has many sub-organizations working for it, lots and lots of them right down to the NGO level, according to him, they’ve been the cause of every major war right through the 20th century to the present. He said that they’d already run the United States for 60 years, back in the 60s. He said they always put their own man in at the top of every party. There’s a form of competition, he said, allowed for junior politicians who want to get up the ladder, but at the top, the Council on Foreign Relations, as it’s now called in the US, runs the show. That’s why when anything happens… we saw with Bill Clinton, even Obama and so on, anything happens that they go FIRST and give a talk. They’re called in to explain themselves to the COUNCIL on Foreign Relations, NOT to the general public of their country.
The British version, international version, is called the Royal Institute for International Affairs. There’s an Australian branch, Canadian branch, there’s a branch in India, the old commonwealth countries… they all have their branches. We’re all run the same way. Their technique was to bring in a SOCIALIZED SYSTEM. Socialism, by their own definition, is an elitist organization where the masses are organized the way THEY THINK THEY should be organized and led by the elite. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Just mentioning that it doesn’t matter what country you’re in, you’re voting in a member of an institution that’s worldwide. Which set its goals a long time ago to bring in an elitist form of socialism where the better people, the fittest - and they’re all Darwinists - would run the world the way it should be run, according to them. They would be POST-democratic in the end. That’s where we are today. We’re under goverNANCE. They call it global governance. That’s happened. So it doesn’t matter if you vote in Bigfoot, the abominable snowman or a pygmy, I guarantee you, they’re a member of the CFR in America, the Royal Institute for International Affairs in Britain. They’ll all belong to the internationalist, socialist party… or, as it’s called, the Fabian Society.
The Fabian Society vowed to reshape the world by HAMMERING IT into shape. That means hammering the people. Hammering OUT the OLD ways, traditions, etc. That’s been accomplished, pretty well, today, if you want to look around you. So many people were conned with Obama being put in there. And he was put in there. He’ll get away with a lot before people start to wake up. It says here in Democracy Now…
As Obama Golfs with UBS CEO Days After Firm Avoids
Criminal Prosecution (Alan: For massive tax evasion, etc.),
UBS Whistleblower Given 40-Month Jail Term
(A: So the whistleblower ended up carrying the can. There’s Obama golfing with the CEO days afterwards… after the sentence. That’s who Obama is, one of their big boys. He’d have never got in unless he was all for eugenics across the planet. He also believes HE is superior and comes from a superior bloodline, selective breeding, special breeding. It’s interesting to go into his mother’s lineage. Very interesting indeed. It says here…)
Who is Obama playing ball with? It looked like business as usual for President Barack Obama on the first day of his vacation in Martha’s Vineyard, President Obama spent five hours golfing with UBS executive Robert Wolf, President of UBS investment bank and chairman and CEO of UBS Group Americas. Wolf, an early financial backer of Obama’s presidential campaign raised $250,000 for him back in 2006. (A: So you can see why he’s got off with it.) In February he was appointed to the White House’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board. (A: Economic recovery, it says here, for whom? This is days after, days after the company was accused of massive, massive tax evasion and fraud and so on. That’s who Obama is. He’s helping one of the guys, one of the many ones that, you know, paid to get him into office. Out golfing with him.)
Remember, these talks I give, I always put the links up on my site at the end of the show and you can check it out for yourself.
I said a long time ago, when they started putting gunboats across the Great Lakes, these supped up gunboats with the massive caliber machine guns on them, flotillas of them in fact. I’ve actually got photographs of some of them with Special Forces on them. Eventually, these would be used during some kind of emergency to keep the people IN. You know what’s coming up, supposedly, this supposed Swine flu. What will happen during a scare even of a Swine flu? All they have to do is scare the bejesus out of the public, show you some guys with special suits on, carrying a stretcher. That’s all they need to do and people will flock trying to get OUT, you see. Under NATO - all countries have signed NATO - the actual plans are to CONTAIN outbreaks of disease, biochemical weaponry, nuclear fallout IN to the same area. Keep it contained. It says anybody who tries to escape from the containment area is to get shot on site and if whole groups try and get out, they’ll be bombed from the air with CS gas. That’s the plans for NATO. It’s amazing isn’t it? This article here is from The Associated Press.
AP IMPACT: Secret process benefits pet projects
By EILEEN SULLIVAN and MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writers / Wed Aug 26
WASHINGTON – A sleepy Montana checkpoint along the Canadian border that sees about three travelers a day will get $15 million (A: $15 MILLION… 3 travelers a day.) under President Barack Obama's economic stimulus plan. A government priority list ranked the project as marginal, but two powerful Democratic senators persuaded the administration to make it happen.
Despite Obama's promises that the stimulus plan would be transparent and free of politics (A: Ha!), the government is handing out $720 million for border upgrades under a process that is both secretive and susceptible to political influence. (A: So there’s a political reason for this as well. Social policy through politics. Whatever they decree will simply be done at the border. They can change any rule that they want as they go along.) This allowed low-priority projects such as the checkpoint in Whitetail, Mont., to skip ahead of more pressing concerns, according to documents revealed to The Associated Press.
A House oversight committee has added the checkpoint projects to its investigation into how the stimulus money is being spent. The top Republican on that committee, California's Rep. Darrell Issa, sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on Wednesday, questioning why some projects leapfrogged others.
It wasn't supposed to be that way. In 2004, Congress ordered Homeland Security to create a list, updated annually, of the most important repairs at checkpoints nationwide. But the Obama administration continued a Bush administration practice of considering other, more subjective factors when deciding which projects get money.
• A border station in Napolitano's home state of Arizona is getting $199 million (A: I thought we were broke. It’s just incredible.), five times more than any other border station. The busy Nogales checkpoint has required repairs for years but was not rated among the neediest projects on the master list reviewed by the AP. Napolitano credited her lobbying as Arizona governor for getting the project near the front of the line for funding under the Bush administration. All it needed was money, which the stimulus provided.
• A checkpoint in Laredo, Texas, which serves more than 55,000 travelers and 4,200 trucks a day, is rated among the government's highest priorities but was passed over for stimulus money. (A: What they’re doing is looking at those areas across Canada mainly and the States where people can literally walk through. It’s all the small places now. Something big is coming along here. You can tell something big is coming along. There’s no doubt about it.)
• The Westhope, N.D., checkpoint, which serves about 73 people a day (A: 73 people a day. That’s all.) and is among the lowest-priority projects, is set to get nearly $15 million for renovations. (A: So you see, it’s all the small places where people could slip through. They’re trying to cover EVERY base so that when something really bad happens, crowds of people can’t get through. That’s what they’re doing… for those that haven’t figured it out.)
There’s a great article here. It’s from the Telegraph.
Have you heard about the company that runs Britain?
It inspects schools, trains our armed forces, helps protect our borders, maintains our nuclear weapons, runs our trains and operates our prisons.
By Graham Ruddick / 26 Aug 2009
Most of the public will never have heard of Serco, a FTSE 100 company that does all of the above and more.
Led by South African Chris Hyman, Serco is also making money doing it and today underlined it is proving one of the recession winners. Profits in the first six months of the year - one of the toughest the UK economy has faced for decades - jumped 33pc to £83.4m. (A: Not bad, eh? Profits in the first 6 months.)
However, Serco's journey into the DNA of Britain's public infrastructure, like those of rival support services companies Capita and Interserve, began before the recession arrived.
All have benefited from the growing culture of outsourcing services under Labour (A: They’ll do it under any government now.), and Serco expects this trend to continue as the gaping hole in the public finances forces the Government to cut back. (A: What they’re doing is public/private… Remember what Carroll Quigley said? The world is to be RUN by a new feudal system comprised of the CEOs of international corporations. It’s here. That’s what all the public/private stuff is about. All these companies are interlocked in a pyramid structure with a capstone on the top so they make sure that they all do what they’re supposed to do, TOLD to do from the top. All of these things are essential services, etc, right down to energy, controlling energy. That’s all part of the SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT stuff.)
Serco has secured a record number of contracts in 2009 so far, worth £4bn, as its revenues climbed 30pc to £1.95bn.
The deals includes a contract to design, build and operate Boris Johnson's cycle hire scheme for London and to operate two new prisons at Belmarsh in London and Maghull in Liverpool.
Back with more of how the world really is after this break.
This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Continuing with an article from The Telegraph about one of the main companies that runs Britain. We’re not run by politicians. Politicians do what they’re told by their masters in the new feudal system that professor Carroll Quigley talked about. This company is called Serco, running jails and everything else.
These come on top of Serco's existing services, which include operating London's Docklands Light Railway, running the Northern Rail and Merseyrail train networks, providing the Ministry of Defence with air surveillance and control systems, and delivering infrastructure and intelligence to the UK Border Agency. (A: EVERY thing is done outside government now.)
To complete the list, Serco also has a six-year contract with Ofsted to run inspections in the Midlands at schools and further education colleges. (A: Inspections, eh?) In defence, the company is battling to win the rights to run the Army's recruitment programme and already helps to train armed forces about using Britain's fleet of aircraft, such as the Chinook and Apache helicopters.
In partnership with Lockheed Martin and Jacobs Engineering, Serco also manages the Atomic Weapons Establishment, which provides and maintains Britain's atomic warheads.
Revenues from civil government work increased 49pc in the period and a bullish Serco expects this trend to continue, giving it even more control of Britain's infrastructure. The company estimates that local authorities have endured a £4bn deficit in income for over the last two years as a result of the recession and that, by 2012 it will have revenues of £5bn.
So, there you go. As I say, you see, there’s been a coup a long time ago. It was done by stealth, Fabian style. We adapt to all the little changes and we hear little terms occasionally. It first came out… I think Prince Charles was the first to really push private/public partnerships, as they call them. That was really the announcement to the public for the first time. Something they’ve been doing quietly but that was the first public announcement. Since then, it’s been just a roll because after all, you see, you’ve got to bypass democracy, as the Club of Rome said. This is how they’ve been doing it. All of these groups are combined together with the bosses at the top. They seem independent of each other but they’re not. They’re ALL going in ONE direction. It’s a planned direction into what they call The New World Order, as Mr. Brown, the Prime Minister of Britain, called it at the G20 meeting. That’s really what’s coming down.
I’ve mentioned that these Fabian socialists always wanted to get rid of the poor. They run everything by economy. They saw early on that there was a lot of poor people especially during the end of the industrial revolution and they said there’s just simply too many for the work at hand, so they wanted to bring down the populations. That’s what socialism started AS. Not to help the workers, although they had to get the workers on board by promising them lots of stuff.
I’ve talked about HG Wells who worked for this organization and the Fabian Society and the Royal Institute for International Affairs. As he said, they’d have to bring in their utopia by eventually sterilizing the unfit, etc. So did George Bernard Shaw, a co-founder. These guys were backed by the richest people on the planet. In fact, the Royal Institute for International Affairs was started up with the Cecil Rhodes Foundation with Rothschild as a co-partner, along with Cecil Rhodes, and then they merged with the Lord Milner Group. Lord Milner and all that group that he merged with were all bankers and banker’s sons… international money lenders.
In the US, of course, they set up other families and one of the prime families was the Rockefellers, who have probably more say in the direction of the US than anybody, any politician that’s ever been or will be.
I’ve warned too about the vaccinations. The big pharma companies that deal with inoculations and vaccinations were already IN business before World War II with their laboratories and giving grants to universities to get data on certain outsourcing you might say, which they then stole the patents of to make the various vaccines. These were also the experts in bacterial and viral warfare. They still are. They work closely with the official bio-warfare institutes. Here’s an article from Australia. This is from March 2002. It’s about a very important and famous person who’s showered with and got accolades and titles galore HEAPED upon him for his supposed breakthroughs in vaccinations, etc. His name was Sir Macfarlane Burnet. This is what he planned, this guy, who was there to, again, HELP you with the vaccinations and things. It says…
Burnet's solution: The plan to poison S-E Asia
By Brendan Nicholson / Political Correspondent / March 10 2002
World-famous microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet, the Nobel prize winner revered as Australia's greatest medical research scientist, secretly urged the government to develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia.
The revelation is contained in top-secret files declassified by the National Archives of Australia, despite resistance from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
I’ll read the rest of this when I come back from this break.
This is Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Sir Macfarlane Burnet. He was a top Noble Prize winner. This is a guy who literally pioneered a lot of the work to do with vaccinations. It’s so odd because his prime concern, if you look into Wikipedia, etc, was on really, not just what caused people to have immune problems but when you’re into that kind of stuff, you’re finding out how to CAUSE immune problems. His great desire was to reduce the population of what he called overcrowded countries. It goes on to say here…
Sir Macfarlane recommended in a secret report in 1947 that biological and chemical weapons should be developed to target food crops and spread infectious diseases.
His key advisory role on biological warfare was uncovered by Canberra historian Philip Dorling in the National Archives in 1998. (A: By the way, this same character, Sir Macfarlane Burnet, was over in Britain in World War II working with the bio-warfare establishment at Porton Downs. It doesn’t mention that here, I think. That’s a fact. That’s also in Wikipedia.)
The department initially blocked release of the material on the basis it would damage Australia's international relations. (A: No kidding.) Dr Dorling sought a review and the material was finally released to him late last year.
The files include a comprehensive memo Sir Macfarlane wrote for the Defence Department in 1947 in which he said Australia should develop biological weapons that would work in tropical Asia without spreading to Australia's more temperate population centres.
"Specifically to the Australian situation, the most effective counter-offensive to threatened invasion by overpopulated Asiatic countries would be directed towards the destruction by biological or chemical means of tropical food crops and the dissemination of infectious disease capable of spreading in tropical but not under Australian conditions," Sir Macfarlane said.
The Victorian-born immunologist, who headed the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, won the Nobel prize for medicine in 1960. He died in 1985 but his theories on immunity and "clonal selection" provided the basis for modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. (A: You see, it’s the same group, same people as the ones I’ve mentioned the last few nights, all working together.)
On December 24, 1946, the secretary of the Department of Defence, F.G. Shedden, wrote to Macfarlane Burnet saying Australia could not ignore the fact that many countries were conducting intense research on biological warfare and inviting him to a meeting of top military officers to discuss the question.
The minutes of a meeting in January, 1947, reveal that Sir Macfarlane argued that Australia's temperate climate could give it a significant military advantage.
"The main contribution of local research so far as Australia is concerned might be to study intensively the possibilities of biological warfare in the tropics against troops and civil populations at a relatively low level of hygiene and with correspondingly high resistance to the common infectious diseases," he told the meeting. (A: In other words, they were finding ways to destroy your immune system. People who are at a low level of hygiene and they would also have had correspondingly high resistance to common infections. That’s the idea, the specialty of guys like Mr. Burnet, was to cause auto-immune problems. Big pharma working with the military industrial establishment. THEY ALWAYS WORK TOGETHER. The two always work together.)
In September, 1947, Sir Macfarlane was invited to join a chemical and biological warfare subcommittee of the New Weapons and Equipment Development Committee.
He prepared a secret report titled Note on War from a Biological Angle suggesting that biological warfare could be a powerful weapon to help defend a thinly populated Australia.
Sir Macfarlane also urged the government to encourage universities (A: They always use universities.) to research those branches of biological science that had a special bearing on biological warfare.
A clinically scientific approach is evident in a note he wrote in June, 1948.
He said a successful attack with a microbiological agent on a large population would have such a devastating impact that its use was extremely unlikely while both sides were capable of retaliation.
"The main strategic use of biological warfare may well be to administer the coup de grace to a virtually defeated enemy and compel surrender in the same way that the atomic bomb served in 1945.
"Its use has the tremendous advantage of not destroying the enemy's industrial potential which can then be taken over intact.
"Overt biological warfare might be used to enforce surrender by psychological rather than direct destructive measures." (A: Think about today with all this hype about a nonexistent flu.)
The minutes of a meeting at Melbourne's Victoria Barracks (A: The military barracks.) in 1948 noted that Sir Macfarlane "was of the opinion that if Australia undertakes work in this field it should be on the tropical offensive side (A: Offensive… that’s first strike, right.) rather than the defensive. There was very little known about biological attack on tropical crops."
After visiting the UK in 1950 and examining the British chemical and biological warfare research effort, Sir Macfarlane told the committee that the initiation of epidemics among enemy populations had usually been discarded as a means of waging war because it was likely to rebound on the user. (A: They got to have the antidotes, you see. They DO have them today.)
"In a country of low sanitation the introduction of an exotic intestinal pathogen, e.g. by water contamination (A: Introduce it into the water.), might initiate widespread dissemination," he said. (A: These are wonderful people, you know. They’re SIRS and LORDS and stuff like that. They give you your vaccines too by the way. The vaccine part is their side hobby.)
"Introduction of yellow fever into a country with appropriate mosquito vectors might build up into a disabling epidemic before control measures were established." (A: This is what he said.)
The subcommittee recommended that "the possibilities of an attack on the food supplies of S-E Asia and Indonesia using B.W. (A: Biological warfare.) agents should be considered by a small study group".
It 1951 it recommended that "a panel reporting to the chemical and biological warfare subcommittee (A: By the way, that’s all the British commonwealths that were involved in this, the biological warfare subcommittee….) should be authorised to report on the offensive potentiality of biological agents likely to be effective against the local food supplies of South-East Asia and Indonesia".
Dr Dorling said that while Sir Macfarlane was a great Australian (A: Oh boy. Was he ever.) he was also a product of times when many Australians held deep fears about more populous Asian countries.
He said the Menzies government was more interested in trying to acquire nuclear weapons. "Fortunately this also proved impracticable and Australia never acquired a weapon of mass destruction."
It’s quite something. When you go in, as I say, to the early life of Mr. Burnet, it says here… It talks about his father and so on. It says when he went to school he read biology articles which introduced him to the work of Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin was one of his heroes.
Frank Macfarlane Burnet
Burnet was born in Traralgon, Victoria; his father, Frank Burnet, a Scottish emigrant to Australia, was the manager of the Traralgon branch of the Colonial Bank. He was the second of seven children and from childhood was known as "Mac". The Burnets moved to Terang in 1909. Burnet was interested in the wildlife around the nearby lake; he joined the Scouts in 1910 and enjoyed all outdoor activities. While living in Terang, he began to collect beetles and study biology. He read biology articles in the Chambers's Encyclopaedia, which introduced him to the work of Charles Darwin.
(A: Then he went to the University of Melbourne.)
From 1917, Burnet attended the University of Melbourne, where he lived in Ormond College on a residential scholarship and studied medicine. There, he read more of Darwin's work and was influenced by the ideas of science and society in the writings of H.G. Wells. (A: Have you read that book? I’ve gone through it with you on the air. It’s a totalitarian regime. It’s to bring in a scientific dictatorship, massive depopulation. It’s the eugenics program. It’s always the same group. It goes on to tell you about when he worked with the British and their bacterial warfare department.)
Interestingly enough, by the way, I mentioned bacteriophages a while back that the Soviets had and in 1926 this Mr. Burnet was working on bacteriophages.
“He was awarded the Beit memorial fellowship by the Lister Institute in 1926 and began full-time research on bacteriophages.“
You see, the elite have been using bacteriophages to kill viruses FOR THEMSELVES for an awful long time, but it’s not ever going to be made available to the public. I put the link on my site. If you go in to the archives section, you’ll see bacteriophages. Look it up and there’s actually a video link for it up on the web and you’ll see it. Here they are, 1926. They already had bacteriophages. Then you see all the other things he was involved in. He identified stuff like
“He identified Staphylococcus aureus in the toxin-antitoxin mixture…”
You see what I’m saying? When you’re involved in all of that, you think you’re all doing this for medical, good medical reasons. You got to understand, they’re all part of the military-industrial complex. Their first project and where the money goes is IN WARFARE PURPOSES; anything else is a side effect. These are the guys who give you your vaccinations. These are the guys who MAKE UP what’s IN your vaccinations and THEY WANT TO DEPOPULATE THE PLANET. I’m kidding you not. It’s so evident today. They’ve said it openly. Go in to The Optimum Population Trust. Go IN to the speeches by Prince Charles. Go in to all these site links I gave yesterday on one of my talks. Go into that link with ALL the different ones I’ve talked about. Depopulation, zero population growth, etc. And how they changed their names to sound more friendly because they were scaring the public. Amazing.
Again, Burnet’s specialty was in immunology and why people would have auto-immune problems. Obviously, you find out how to create the auto-immune problems. You see, if you create auto-immune problems, you can be wide open to simple infections that normally wouldn’t harm you and end up killing you. You’ve got to understand this. YOU GOT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON. GOT TO.
Now, I’ll go to the callers. There’s Sylvia in New York. Are you there Sylvia?
Sylvia: Hi Mr. Watt. Yes. I’m here. Can you hear me?
Alan: Yes I can.
Sylvia: Hi. Thanks for taking my call. This is sort of off topic from Mr. Burnet. But since Ted Kennedy died this week, it occurred to me earlier tonight. I’m wondering if you have an opinion as to why JFK managed to get elected to the office of the Presidency, given that I don’t think he was a CFR member or even a Bilderberger or Trilateralist. Do you think it was just his father’s influence given there was no black box voting back then?
Alan: I think it was his father’s influence. When Joseph Kennedy, during World War II, I don’t know if people really realize, was put over as Ambassador to Britain and he lived in Buckingham Palace with the Queen. They were that close. They were really IN tight with the establishment. I think that they thought that the sons would all ‘toe the line’. They were born with silver spoons in their mouth. Of course, one became aberrant, maybe had a bit of a conscience and started to say certain things that perhaps weren’t too wise. One of his big talks he gave was about America being run by secret societies and by that he meant the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and so on.
Sylvia: National Press Club.
Alan: That’s right. That really was the downfall. It was the first time anybody of import at that level had ever said such a thing in public. The people hadn’t even heard of these organizations before.
Sylvia: One other quick question. I apologize. In your opinion, now this is solely your own personal opinion. Do you believe that we are looking at a potential civil war in the United States or just that we may be taken down without a shot, in terms of just being taken down by biological warfare as you’ve been discussing tonight.
Alan: It’s more than just biological warfare, that could certainly, certainly be something that’s released, but we’ve been taken down without firing a shot since the 1960s, 1950s, actually. The whole culture’s destroyed. The public have been trained incrementally to adapt and adapt and adapt into a whole new system of ACCEPTING governance. They don’t think much about politics, most people. They don’t really question much. They subconsciously accept they’re simply under some sort of governance. They’ve been taught to obey all authorities. They’ve been taught even more with all the tasering going on. That’s to terrify the public NOT to disobey a cop’s order. So there’s many ways to take the country down. You got to create a state of apathy. That has been done. Lord Bertrand Russell said towards the end they would have to introduce massive apathy. So you’ve got unemployment; everybody’s scared stiff about keeping a job, keeping their rent paid or their mortgage paid as people lose houses and so on. We’re kept busy and frustrated and anxious. That’s all part of the creation of apathy. Meanwhile, the massive media propaganda campaigns are really indoctrinating them and treating them just the same as Pavlov would treat animals. Training you to be terrified of a coming flu that really doesn’t exist.
What’s even more important, the World Health Organization dropped 3 or 4 of its CRITERIA they needed to call something a pandemic; they simply dropped the classifications so they could get this through as a pandemic. This massive attempt at compulsory inoculation is the last bastion. Your body is the only thing you’ve got left. They’re already trying to get in to your mind. They have all your data because of all your information. When you allow governments to have authority over your body and what they are going to stick in it, whether it’s a dagger, a taser or a bullet or an injection, these are all INTRUSIVE actions and you can’t allow that to start. I’ve got the document from the World Health Organization from their meeting, the world meeting in 2006, and they say right in there, that once they get the public conditioned that they MUST get a shot, they’re going to get shots EVERY YEAR for various other things and booster shots every year for all the other diseases and so on. This is the start of a training exercise and I’ll guarantee you too, they do want to bring the population down. They won’t all die at once but we know from the polio vaccines, the Simian 40 virus caused massive cancer and it depends on your gene type and your physiology as to when it will actually hit you. So it’s nice and spread out. I don’t trust them at all. Something stinks about all of this. We’ve got to say NO. Even when they’re saying NOW they’re going to start fining people a $1000 a day if they refuse it.
Sylvia: Right. So it will be like Germany. First they came for the communists, I said nothing. Then they came for the socialists, I said nothing. I mean, you know, it’s that kind of apathy.
Alan: That’s correct. They’ve destroyed family. They’ve destroyed the cohesion of family. You have what Bertrand Russell said they’d do. You have egocentric people who literally spin around in their own little environment, working for pleasure in their spare time and they can’t bond with other people. When you can’t bond, you don’t really bond, you’re selfish, then no one’s going to stand up as a group and say THAT’S IT. This is all a long-term strategy of take down. They’re right there now.
Sylvia: Very disheartening. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Watt. I appreciate it. I appreciate everything you do and by the way, my husband’s online tonight with PayPal and offering a donation.
Alan: I really appreciate that.
Sylvia: Thank you. Have a good night.
Alan: You too. Here’s the break coming up. People don’t realize how bad it is. We’ve been under attack for an awful long time. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Remember what Quigley said. He said, the Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs are often mistaken with their policies as being communist. Then he said but they do share the same values. What it is, he’s talking about the Fabian Socialism. That’s what it is. Where elitists and experts and scientists will control the public through agencies and bureaucracies and they’ll control you from birth to death. Of course, they set up the communist system as the fastest way for some countries to have a revolution and standardize them all together into the same types of system, KNOWING THEY WOULD MERGE THEM with the West further down the road. That came out in the Reece Commission when Congress investigated the tax-exempt foundations. To show you how the communists work, the communist system... Remember the plank, they’d have the REdistribution of wealth. Well, that’s what the UN was set up partly to do, but it’s also the big stick in many other areas including your health. This article here is from BBC News.
Climate protection 'to cost more'
(A: Now that’s the guise to bring us all into servitude under a
socialist/communistic style system across the planet.)
By Richard Black / Environment correspondent, BBC News website / August 27, 2009.
Protecting societies against the impacts of climate change will be much more expensive than previously believed, according to a new analysis.
In 2007, the UN climate convention came up with a sum of $49-171bn per year.
The new report says the UN sums omitted important factors and the true cost will be two to three times higher. (A: Than $171 billion per year.)
Developing nations want rich countries to provide major sums for adaptation as part of the new UN climate deal due to be agreed in Copenhagen in December. (A: Amazing eh? Where’s the democracy in this? Who comes to you and asks you for more of your tax dollars? …for this? We are under governance. It’s nothing to do with voting people in. That’s long gone. We don’t vote in the UN and ask the UN or tell them what to do. They’re telling US what to do. Every country, every politician at the top signs this IN to treaty which makes it LAW. The law of the land and lands.)
"The amount of money on the table at Copenhagen is one of the key factors that will determine whether we achieve a climate change agreement," (A: As I say, that’s just a bogus… for the distribution of wealth. That means YOU, your wealth. Even if you know you’re poor, it doesn’t matter. You’re still classified as wealthy as long as they can get more taxes out of you. This is the world of SERVITUDE we’re going in to as the Royal Institute of International Affairs said. That’s what your voluntary servitude for the youngsters is all about. Training them from a very young age.) said lead author Martin Parry, a visiting research fellow with the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London. (A: Another institute, you see.)
Professor Parry co-chaired the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (A: These are the only scientists that are on board because they all get their paychecks OFF this whole scam of climate change at the IPCC at the United Nations.) working group on climate impacts for its 2007 assessment.
The new report - issued under the aegis of the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and the Grantham Institute - says that some aspects of the UN estimates were wrong by a factor of more than 100. (A: Boy. We’re really going to spend out. We’re as well as giving our clothes off our backs too. Maybe they’ll leave you a little computer or something you can text message on or watch porn or at least leave you your TV so you can watch the funnies. That’s where most folk are. They haven’t a clue what’s going down.)
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Obama Golfs with UBS CEO Days After Firm Avoids Criminal Prosecution, UBS
Whistleblower Given 40-Month Jail Term" (democracynow.org) - Aug. 27,
"AP IMPACT: Secret process benefits pet projects" [Secret Border Deals: Canada-US] - Aug. 26, 2009.
"Have you heard about the company that runs Britain?" by Graham Ruddick (telegraph.co.uk) - Aug. 26, 2009.
"Burnet's solution: The plan to poison S-E Asia" by Brendan Nicholson (theage.com.au) - March 10, 2002.
"Frank Macfarlane Burnet" (wikipedia.org).
"Climate protection 'to cost more' " by Richard Black (news.bbc.co.uk) - Aug. 27, 2009.
Transcribed by Diana