Aug. 6, 2009 (#380)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 6, 2009:
Slaves in Perpetuity to the Bankers' Ingenuity:
"Totalitarians Always Say 'For the Greater
As They Take Control over Vital Things, e.g. Energy and Food,
Right-wingers Never Catch On, They Say it Just ain't So,
As Banking Giants and I.M.F. Complete Communist Manifesto,
The Middle Class is Levelling, Lived to Serve Their Purpose,
With Industry Gone and China's Rise, They're Free-falling to the Surface,
They Put Savings in the Stock Market, with the Advice from This-or-That,
Together They're Slumming, Never Saw it Coming, This Perfect Coup d'ťtat"
© Alan Watt Aug. 6, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 6, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 6th 2009. Newcomers, as always, I advise you to go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and youíll find hundreds of hours of talks Iíve given in the past that you can download for free and listen at your leisure. You can also see on that front page all the other sites I have. Bookmark them for future use because occasionally the big servers go down. That way youíll always have another one where you can download from. [listed above] Thereís alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. This is the European site which has all the audios but it also has a lot of transcripts written in the various languages of Europe. You can download them for print up and you can pass them around.
Remember too, you the listeners keep me going. I donít put myself under the auspices of advertisers. The advertisers you hear on the show pay the station direct for the air time, the equipment, the staff and all the rest of it. Thereís a lot involved in just running a radio station. Very expensive. Everything is expensive. What I do here is expensive. Itís up to you to keep me going through contributions or buying the books and so on that I have for sale. Remember too, you can donate. [Options listed above] Some inventive people just use cash and send that over. That cuts out the middle man who gets pretty fat off of all our transactions. I should also say that many people just get the disks burned and passed around. I was surprised how many people donít use the computer. Iím delighted, mind you, because itís a temporary stopgap until itís totalitarian like everything else, the way things are going. So they just listen to the CDs that are burned for them by other people on their CD players. You can get in touch with me at [listed above].
We are under a totalitarian system. If people havenít really noticed and theyíre still caught up in the left-wing, right-wing paradigm as though itís some eternal pair - twin bothers fighting each other down through eternity - then theyíll never really figure it out. Thereís only one side. Thereís only one side running this whole show. I donít care what term you give to it whether itís Nazism, Fascism, Communism, itís all the same thing. All the same thing. Capitalism gave rise to communism. It birthed communism for a future method of control. Capitalism never wanted democracy. When various Chartists rights groups and so on were demanding rights for the people, the big boys at the time - who had already ruled the world for a long time and commerce and trade and banking and countries - were going to have none of this democracy stuff. They gave a sort of show of it to the public but in reality, there was always a dominant elite behind the show running everything. They call it The Establishment in London. They donít call it anything but The Establishment. The very old families that are stinking rich. Iíll be back with more about this after these messages.
This is Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve gone over this part of the system which people never talk about. When they do, theyíre often censored. People like Professor Carroll Quigley who was the historian FOR the Council on Foreign Relations which is just an American branch of the Royal Institute for International Affairs. Both so-called non-governmental bodies that get massive funding from that other part of the parallel government, the foundations. In fact, most of their books are printed by the Rockefeller Foundation. You can see that on the second page in their books. They were going to have no part of a democracy; however, typical of them, they always use everything that happens to their advantage. Itís like Gary Hart after 9/11 giving the speech to the Council on Foreign Relations where he said Ďwe can use this disaster to our advantage.í Never explaining to the public what they meant by that. What was our advantage? It means they have some sort of goal there and they do.
Iíve gone through the history of the CFR, the RIIA. Professor Carroll Quigley was the authorized historian of that group. He was given access to their records. He really wanted to come out and tell the public that this group had influenced the direction of the entire world for over 100 years. He thought it was time the public sort of knew about it. He didnít think the public would mind because he was up in his ivory tower as a Professor. He was also a Professor who gave a lot of advice to the State Department and different departments within the US, even the Pentagon. Big player. He wrote his book Tragedy and Hope and also a fantastic companion to it was The Anglo-American Establishment where he fills in a lot of the blanks in history where you just get dates in school. He tells you the whys for the wars and who fomented them, who funded them, etc. He did go through the history of the big bankers that started up the Lord Alfred Milner Group that combined with the Cecil Rhodes Group. Both were for world government. More than just world government. He said that they always took everything to their advantage. Every very disaster, every crisis that happened they used it to their advantage.
What you should understand is thereís an ongoing agenda. The capitalist bankers funded communism from the very get-go. The bankers were going to have NONE of this rights for the people stuff. They funded communism into existence and they kept funding it through its entire duration, in Russia and the Soviet Union. They also set out many of their members to TEACH communism into China to prepare China for their up-and-coming role, which we only NOW see, to be the manufacturer of the world. They decided this a long, long time ago. They played geo-politics. Geo-politics, thatís long-range strategies to do with every country. They use ethnologists, zoologists, all kinds of -ologists. They basically study different types of cultures, how to use them, how to manipulate them and so on. Often, they know, a particular part of their agenda might take 100 years to pull off.
That was written about by one of their members, Bertrand Russell. He, around the same time as Lenin, said that this new system, this new ORDERED system - a planned world society - would start to take shape and be known, to emerge to the public around the millennium, the year 2000 or so. They both said it, Lenin and Lord Bertrand Russell, supposedly on opposite sides of the camp. Youíll notice in the last few years weíve heard the term governance. That came out, that was invented by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a PRIVATE organization that really runs Europe and America through the Council on Foreign Relations and a good part of the rest of the world as well. They have branches in ALL countries.
Therefore, weíre getting to the end of this phase. Communism was the fastest way; remember centralization of government was the most important thing for communism. Centralization. All power comes from the center. All laws are dictated from the center. Thatís why Karl Marx sent a telegram to Lincoln at the end of the Civil War congratulating him on promoting the centralization and increasing the power of government. No oneís ever asked why that letter, that telegram, is in the Congressional Records. Itís IN the library of the US Congress. No oneís ever asked that. Weíve seen 100 years of struggle as the feds have taken over, state by state, through different and devious means, different states until theyíre all under the thumb of the money boys who distribute the money - redistribute the money for roads and so on - until theyíre running the whole show. Thatís centralization of government.
The soviet system was the fastest way of centralizing government. Kick off, fund Russia and then when Soviet Russia takes over, a whole bunch of countriesÖ. It would have taken them years, 100 years or more of propaganda and infiltration and stealth and revolutions to get all those countries to go down one by one. So they used Soviet Russia to take over those countriesÖ through simple, quick invasions, and standardize them into the same system very quickly. Lo and behold, after the set period that Lenin said - he talked about 70 years of a dictatorship - down it came. It was all ready now with a whole bunch of countries which really were running on the same system as Britain. The Civil Service system was the same. The school system was the same. The whole ordered system was the same. Thatís why it happened.
People canít catch on to that. They still think itís left-wing and right-wing and right-wing and left-wing. They never think about the third group at the top comprised of what they think is their own boys, capitalists and bankers. Theyíre not yours. They never were. Now, theyíre teaching you about global governance. Governance. Governance is different from government. Governance is a world ruled by experts where you do as youíre told. The experts have complete and total - THE WORD is TOTAL - power and you just obey. In a totalitarian regime, a police state, a world police state thereís no complaints department; you do as youíre told. Havenít you noticed since 9/11 the whole world has gone under the exact same system? Now, weíve all to be spied on, even in our own homes by the way. Theyíve started off the program in Britain just like Orwell predicted. People still think itís a left-wing, right-wing thing. No idea.
The bankers would be so happy. They used to hate it when they lent out money to private individuals. Iím talking about the big, big bankers, the internationalist boys, the ones who loan to countries. They wanted to loan to countries because if they can own the Parliaments or the Congress of countries, itís easy to get those same politicians to make it law that the people of the countries must pay the government back and the government passes it back to the bankers. They become the tax collectors for all the borrowed money. The bankers donít have to send any people out to do it. No strong men, nothing. The governments do it all for them. Itís far tidier that way isnít it? So they wanted a non-democratic system. It suits them SO well.
Remember too, the Milner Group and Cecil Rhodes were set out not only to foment wars throughout the world through revolution and to start off wars of Ďliberation,í they called them, across the world. This London group of aristocrats and bankers - many of them had Lord titles, inherited titles. They were Sirs at the very least, Sirs. They set up the Young Turks and the Young Italians, all these young revolutionary groups, to overthrow existing systems SO they could bring in the same system that Britain was run under and Britain was never, ever a democracy.
The word democracy now is anathema to the people. Iíve looked at polls. They kept doing polls year after year to see what people thought of democracy. Did they vote and so on. Every year it gets less and less and less. They say thatís because they want it that way. That means the public are now accepting that their experts have the right to rule over them and that they have no right. To think, ĎWhy bother voting; what do I know, Iím not an expert.í So let the experts rule over us.
Cecil Rhodes wanted to take over the entire resources of the planetÖ with the Milner Group. Thatís all energy, all food supplies. They wanted to get a standard, fixed population, a world population. They wanted to set up a world parliamentary body. That started off as the League of Nations and then it became the United Nations. They even said that eventually the United Nations would be a responsible for getting all of the food supply of the world brought to it - to its depots - and then they would redistribute it across the planetÖ IN ORDER TO CONTROL THE PEOPLE. Not to feed the people, but to control the people. Each region - they had all the countries marked in regions even as early as World War II. They had maps out in World War II about the Ďregionsí of the world that they were bringing into existence. The United Nations would dole out the food to each region and then it would be up to the leaders of those countries to decide how many of the population theyíd have to take down. Of course, once it starts, theyíll give you less every year. Theyíll say, Ďoh my goodness, the crop was bad this year, weíve got less to hand out so youíll have to make sure you terminate moreíÖ or at least sterilize an extra bunch. Iím not kidding you. This is the REAL history. Guess what? Theyíre doing it. Youíre living right through it and you donít know. Iíll be back with more after this break.
This is Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, just doing a little bit of history and historical background to try and get through to those who are receptive, who havenít been completely brain-washed by the left and right-wing nonsense and who KNOW thereís another party that runs the show. Who runs both parties? MONEY runs both parties. Those who run the money, own both parties. Simple as that. Thereís nothing mysterious about it.
Weíve seen what happens in the past when bankers decide to fleece the public. They do it at least once or twice every century. They allow you to accumulate and accumulate and accumulate and then they rob you. Thatís standard banking practice by the international boys. Standard. They never lose anything. They never lose anything. The Great Depression they say was put together by 3 men. There was Morgan and Gould and another one who decided to crash the economy of America, loot the public and all their savings and pensions, which they did, to take down a main competitor who was then forced to sell his international business in oil, etc for peanuts. So they crashed the economy of the planetÖ and reaped massive profits. Itís very easy because thereís no law to stop you from doing it. Do you know that? Thereís never been a law put up to stop this from happening again.
We saw the same thing with Mr. Soros, the front man for Rothschild, who put a half page in a British newspaper a few years ago boasting of how he and 2 of his friends had done the same thing to Britain. How they manipulated the stock market, etc, crashed the British economy and forced Britain to go cap-in-hand to them who acted on behalf of the international bankers. BOASTED about it. Nothingís been changed about it. We saw this latest farce as they did it again, but it was more that just looting the public. It was to get the next stage underway. Iíve gone through that. The idea of the International Monetary Fund was always, according to John Maynard Keynes who set up the Bretton Woods Agreement, the first part and a second part that would take over from the first part of the system. He set it up. He said thereíd be a second part. Keynes said there would be a second part to this Agreement which would go much, much further but HE would not live to see it in his day. He was utterly, entirely socialist.
Socialism is just the same, really, as the Soviet system, collectivism. Where a small, hereditary elite live very high on the hog via their own laws, and kept that way BY the masses of the people who are FLATTENED down below them all living in the same equal squalor. Thatís what socialism is. Itís also a planned economy, a planned population, etc. Youíll hear one of the founders of the Fabian Society on The Soviet Story. One of the best videos theyíve put out there on what really happened inside the Soviet Union. Youíll hear George Bernard Shaw talking on behalf of the socialist international. The same group that Blair and Brown and all these characters belong to, by the way, and many in the US. Youíll hear him saying the people will have to COME TO THEM TO JUSTIFY WHY THEY SHOULD KEEP YOU ALIVE. No kidding. Thatís the real system.
These guys never, everÖ I used to wonder how come they never go against the big bankers? Well, you see, itís the big bankers that are the boys who WANT this collectivist, socialist system across the planet and a planned economy. They want the right to rule and own all resources. Theyíve got it through stealth agreements with the United Nations as they make big biospheres and big parks everywhere. Then they and their corporationsÖ these banks have so many corporations to go through all the different front companies they have and they have the rights to drill and to mine on these parks that no member of the public can even walk on anymore. Then the other beautiful deal at the IMF, Land for Debt swap. Theyíll forgive your debt. Thatís why they do it all over the third world and not just the third world, by the way. The more debt you get into, Ďoh weíll just take this; weíll call it a park. It will be ours; our park and no one else will have rights over it except us.í This is reality. Meanwhile, everybody at the bottom is still fighting over the latest bit of news. Oh, itís the left-wing, itís the right-wing. No. The two wings belong to the same bird And the body of the bird is always hidden behind a shield.
On Tuesday, I talked a bit from a web site. Itís by Jeffrey Smith. Heís got a very good article on the genetically modified food. I didnít read it all. I went in to how they managed to ram that through, through stealth, lies and all the rest of it and disregarded ALL the medical information that had come in about stomach cancers and all the rest of it. That was just irrelevant to their plan. After all, depopulation is part of this, remember, and sterilization is another part. All this stuff thatís put in does both beautifully enough. Monsanto is part of the bio-warfare industry and so are all the other big companies. In fact, all the top electronic companies are also part of their bio-warfare industry or the military-industrial complex. Theyíre all part of the same thing. I can remember when it came out in the news years ago that General Electric created the big Gatling gun that all the choppers and planes and jets were using. It fired thousands of rounds per minute. General Electric. Whoíd have thought? I thought they made toasters. Back with more after this break.
Iím Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Iím going to read an article that I read part of on Tuesday. This is the latter part of it, the bottom half. From Jeffrey Smith. Itís to do with GMO foods and so on. He went on about how it had all been rammed through the Congress and so on. Thereís no independent testing done. In fact, youíre not allowed to do any independent testing on GMO without authorization by the guys who own the patents on the GMO. What a great deal. Food is a weapon, remember, a very powerful weapon. It can be used many ways as a weapon too. Even just simply the deprivation of food is a weapon. We saw that in the Oil For Food scandal that the United Nations was running in Iraq. It says hereÖ
You're Appointing Who? Please Obama, Say It's Not So!
Jeffrey Smith / Posted: July 23, 2009
The Fox Guarding the Chickens
If GMOs are indeed responsible for massive sickness and death, then the individual who oversaw the FDA (Alan: The Food and Drug Administration) policy that facilitated their introduction holds a uniquely infamous role in human history. That person is Michael Taylor. He had been Monsanto's attorney before becoming policy chief at the FDA. Soon after, he became Monsanto's vice president and chief lobbyist. (A: Remember, Obama said he would appoint no lobbyists. All heís done is appoint lobbyists.)
This month Michael Taylor became the senior advisor to the commissioner of the FDA. He is now America's food safety czar. What have we done?
The Milk Man Cometh
While Taylor was at the FDA in the early 90's, he also oversaw the policy regarding Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH/rbST) -- injected into cows to increase milk supply.
The milk from injected cows has more pus, more antibiotics, more bovine growth hormone, and most importantly, more insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). IGF-1 is a huge risk factor for common cancers and its high levels in this drugged milk is why so many medical organizations and hospitals have taken stands against rbGH. A former Monsanto scientist told me that when three of his Monsanto colleagues evaluated rbGH safety and discovered the elevated IGF-1 levels, even they refused to drink any more milk -- unless it was organic and therefore untreated.
Government scientists from Canada evaluated the FDA's approval of rbGH and concluded that it was a dangerous facade. The drug was banned in Canada, as well as Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. But it was approved in the US while Michael Taylor was in charge. His drugged milk might have caused a significant rise in US cancer rates. Additional published evidence also implicates rbGH in the high rate of fraternal twins in the US.
Taylor also determined that milk from injected cows did not require any special labeling. (A: Thatís what they did, of course, to the GMO too.) And as a gift to his future employer Monsanto (A: Itís great how they just bounce back and forth from the FDA into Monsanto and then back into the FDA again. Isnít it beautiful?), he wrote a white paper suggesting that if companies ever had the audacity to label their products as not using rbGH, they should also include a disclaimer stating that according to the FDA, there is no difference between milk from treated and untreated cows. (A: Thatís basically what they did with the GMO vegetables and so on.)
Taylor's disclaimer was also a lie. Monsanto's own studies and FDA scientists officially acknowledged differences in the drugged milk. No matter. Monsanto used Taylor's white paper as the basis to successfully sue dairies that labeled their products as rbGH-free.
Theyíve got all the power. Why is that? Why do the foxes have all the power? Why is that? Thereís another organization at work here. Itís not left and right. Thereís a top to this triangle that runs it all. Iíve just mentioned earlier on who they were and what their goals are. Thereís an awful lot more to this particular article. Iíll put this up on my web site, these links that I mention tonight and you can go in there and look at them for yourselfÖ and save them too. These things go missing eventually and history is lost.
The food bill is quite something else. Thereís a site called axisoflogic: Finding clarity in the 21st century mediaplex. It says hereÖ
Insane Food Bill 2749 Passes House On 2nd Try.
HR 2749: Totalitarian Control Of Our Food Supply
(A: Thatís a fact. It is.)
By A collective of food-farm citizens
Farm Wars / Saturday, Aug 1, 2009
A new food safety bill is on the fast track in Congress-HR 2749, the Food Safety Enhancement Act (A: Isnít the beautiful. It sounds wonderful and fuzzy.) of 2009. The bill needs to be stopped. HR 2749 gives FDA tremendous power while significantly diminishing existing judicial restraints on actions taken by the agency. The bill would impose a one-size-fits-all regulatory scheme on small farms and local artisanal producers; and it would disproportionately impact their operations for the worse. HR 2749 does not address underlying causes of food safety problems such as industrial agriculture practices and the consolidation of our food supply. (A: And boy is it being consolidated and taken over. It has been for years. But thatís part of the manifesto too.) The industrial food system and food imports are badly in need of effective regulation, but the bill does not specifically direct regulation or resources to these areas.
To read a detailed account of the bill, go to The Farmer-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (Read the section on tracing. That is NAIS, isn't it? ≠ highly disguised yet triggered by the word "trace." )
Alarming Provisions: Some of the more alarming provisions in the bill are:
* HR 2749 would impose an annual registration fee of $500 on any "facility" (A: This is how itís worded by these con men we call lawyers. Itís so close to liars, thatís not a coincidence is it?) that holds, processes, or manufactures food. (A: Do you understand that ANYthing that holds foodÖ that can be your fridge. Processes, thatís your kitchen. Etc. They want to inspect all this stuff.) [isn't this every home in the US, every garden?] Although "farms" are exempt, the agency has defined "farm" narrowly. [What is the definition?] And people making foods such as lacto-fermented vegetables, cheeses, or breads would be required to register and pay the fee, which could drive beginning and small producers out of business during difficult economic times. (A: Well you see, thatís not why you get these fees. Fees, really, are a license. When you get a license, youíre now registered. Your system is owned. Then next time if you donít toe the line, they take away your license, you see, and you canít grow any more. We accept that strange kind of law donít we? ĎOh, you canít do this anymore; weíre taking your license away.í You canít drive or you canít have a garden or whatever the hell it happens to be. We accept that strange logic donít we? Strange how that works. We always fall for the first part and you go along and you pay the fee. A license, remember, is the permission to do something that is otherwise illegal. How can paying money make something legal? Think about it.) [Yes. There are laws against this corporate-size-destroys-the-little-guy policy, aren't there? Are home bread or cheese or lacto-fermented vegetable makers who make for their own families included in this?] (A: Itís so vaguely worded. Youíre darned right it will be.)
* HR 2749 would empower FDA to regulate how crops are raised and harvested. It puts the federal government right on the farm, dictating to our farmers. (A: Weíve had that in Canada because the Canadian farmers and the European farmers fell for all the free, tax-exempt things at the beginning. They fell for it all until basically, now theyíre getting ordered what to do from governments, bureaucrats. Never take anything for free. Itís never free.) [This astounding control opens the door to CODEX. WTO "good farming practices" will include the elimination of organic farming by eliminating manure (A: It will eliminate manure and all that will be left is the chemicals.), mandating GMO animal feed, imposing animal drugs, and ordering applications of petrochemical fertilizers and pesticides. Farmers, thus, will be locked not only into the industrialization of once normal and organic farms but into the forced purchase of industry's products. They will be slaves on the land, doing the work they are ordered to do.
Itís much like China really. Isnít it? I guess China is the model state you know. They keep saying it to us. All the Lords and these Sirs, like Mr. Tickell, praise China as a model state that weíre supposed to follow in ALL of their policies. Whoíd have thunk, eh? I would have because I knew it was coming an awful long time ago. Iíll put this link up too. Have a good look at it.
Hereís an article here about food as a weapon because thatís what it is, even though it doesnít say that here. CNN Money.
Detroit's downfall: Hunger hits Detroit's middle class
Food has long been an issue in this city without a major supermarket.
Now demand for assistance is rising, affecting a whole new set of people.
By Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney.com staff writer / August 7, 2009
DETROIT (CNNMoney.com) -- On a side street in an old industrial neighborhood, a delivery man stacks a dolly of goods outside a store. Ten feet away stands another man clad in military fatigues, combat boots and what appears to be a flak jacket. He looks straight out of Baghdad. But this isn't Iraq. It's southeast Detroit, and he's there to guard the groceries. (A: No kidding.)
"No pictures, put the camera down," he yells. My companion and I, on a tour of how people in this city are using urban farms to grow their own food, speed off.
In this recession-racked town, the lack of food is a serious problem. It's a theme that comes up again and again in conversations in Detroit. There isn't a single major chain supermarket in the city, forcing residents to buy food from corner stores. Often less healthy and more expensive food.
As the area's economy worsens --unemployment was over 16% in July -- food stamp applications and pantry visits have surged.
Detroiters have responded to this crisis. Huge amounts of vacant land has led to a resurgence in urban farming. Volunteers at local food pantries have also increased. (A: All the charities are out there.)
But the food crunch is intensifying, and spreading to people not used to dealing with hunger. As middle class workers lose their jobs, the same folks that used to donate to soup kitchens and pantries have become their fastest growing set of recipients.
This is no accident either. I read this article, this character came forward to Obama when Obama was running and just put his proposal to him on how they could get rid of all the URBAN mess they have out there. His policy is to destroy, knock all the old houses downÖ that people are living in, mind you. After all, youíre post-industrial; you donít need them anymore. Iím not kidding you. Go in to see what architects have been taught for the last 15 years. Iíll put some of this up on my site next week. Iíll do a show on it, in fact. Architects are being told that theyíre going to do this very thing. Theyíre even designing massive machines to take down ENTIRE residential sites in urban areas. MASSIVE machines, like something out of science fiction, gobbles them up. Do you think this is spontaneous? This was planned years ago.
This was planned when they went ahead and created the GATT agreement. And many years BEFORE THAT, when they have to do all the back and forth with bureaucrats to countries to get the agreements all ready. It took them years to set that up. They knew that THEN that they were going to bring you in to a post-industrial era. They knew they were going to set up China to be the manufacturer for the planet. They also knew that they were going to take the cars off the road. You donít need cars to get to work if you donít have any work outside in factories, do you? That is what the architects have actually been taught. Theyíre building and planning for a car-free world. Guess what that is? Agenda 21. The Agenda for the 21st Century. Have a look at it at the United Nations web site. All planned a long, long time ago.
And you think things just happen day by day and you vote the Right in and theyíre bad. Then you vote the Left in and then theyíre bad. And you keep voting one or the other back in. And they just keep screwing up. They donít. There are no screw-ups at that level. No. None at all. And things are getting bad. Things are getting bad and theyíre going to get a lot worse. Literally, the architects are being told that everyone is to be crowded in to another UN term and invention, Supercities. In fact, about 10 years ago it was the United Nations that advised the setting up of what they called Supercities. First, the amalgamation of all small cities around the main ones and then the gradual destroying of the urban areas around them, putting up taller and taller and taller buildings until weíre all living on top of each other. Thatís the future they have plannedÖ for the masses, that is. They have special ones put aside for the bureaucrats. Theyíll have their dachas in the country just like the Russians, the Politburo, did. Little retreats and beautiful log homes and stuff and servants and all that kind of stuff. Only in these ones for the Americas etc, theyíll have apart from their servants and their butlers and their maids and their big feasts where they eat lots of meat, by the way, and lots of courses and belch off a lot of gasses, theyíll also have massive solar farms and all that kind of stuff to keep them going. The height of luxury. But thatís the future. Thatís the future. Guess what? Itís already planned. Itís got nothing to do with any input from you or IÖ at all. Not at all.
Thatís where the food comes in. FOOD IS A WEAPON. FOOD IS POWER. Itís been said at the Ministry of Agriculture at the United Nations that food has always been used as a weapon. We saw them doing that in Iraq. In fact, remember Madeline Albright? When they put an embargoÖ an embargo means they starve you to death, by the way. When the UN advises an embargo, that means they starve a people to death. Itís going to happen once again. Madeline Albright, by the way, has been appointed to a new branch at NATO and I guarantee you, youíll see Iran and a bunch of other countries getting starved to death very shortly. She said it was well worth it when she was told that half a million folk were starved to death. That was in the early days. It rose to over a million. These are the monsters that are in charge.
Iíll go to the callers now and thereís Gabriel from California. Are you there Gabriel?
Gabriel: Alan, I love your show. Iíll donate money as soon as I can get some. The thing I wanted to find out is if anybody out there, if you could actually research this. Years ago, I was watching something on I think it was BBC. Iím pretty sure it was BBC. Where they had a second guy in charge under Milosevic. I donít remember what his name wasÖ during the Bosnian conflict. He was being interviewed. I wasnít Walter Cronkite, it was a famous British anchorman, or whatever, reporter. He had come straight out and said, the gentleman that was second in charge of Milosevic that pretty much, he takes his orders from the Queen of England. He flat out said it right there onÖ I canít find it anywhere. I was shocked and amazed by that. I tried calling the BBC and tried to get a copy of it. They didnít have a copy of it, etc. But then the journalist pretty much was like, the conversation went like this pretty much. Who do you get your orders from or who do you take your orders from? He was like, the Queen of England. He was like, we donít have to get in to that. Thatís exactly what the journalist said. Then they kind of just brushed right along beside it. This was during the Bosnian conflict. It was right there.
Alan: Oh yes. Not only that, if you can think back when Margaret Thatcher brought Gorbachev into Britain. He was the President of what was still the Soviet Union. The media went in to action and they talked about his $5000 suit. He was a new kind of communist, a trendy communist. They gave him this big build up, a different persona. Everywhere he went was on Maggie Thatcherís arm. I said, whatís going on here? Then, of course, she brought him across to the US and they did the same build up, Gorbachev and his wife. His wife went on TV, talked about lipstick, makeup and how she could get everything in the Soviet Union including a face-lift. You just walk into a clinic off the street. It was years after, they said that the media had agreed not to ask any political questions whatsoever. Hang on and Iíll come back on that after this break.
Iím Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Weíre talking to Gabriel from California who was just mentioning this odd connection of the Soviet system and Royalty of Britain. Itís not just the Royalty, itís also the Royal Institute of International Affairs which is a Royally chartered non-governmental organization that doesnít play politics. They tell you that they donít play politics because they make a world agenda. But when they brought Gorbachev across on Maggie Thatcherís arm, when he was still the head, the President of the Soviet Union, the media agreed - they didnít tell any of the public at the time - never to ask anything about politics whatsoever. Meanwhile, the media went in, typical Madison Avenue style, creating a personality cult around him, the same way they did with Obama. Then they did polls after it in the US and in Britain and said if Gorbachev was running in your countries, would you vote for him? 70% of the public, after this barrage of personality cult nonsense, said yes, they would. Thatís how EASY it is to con the public. So simple. They donít even know itís being done and yet it took 4 or 5 years later that then the press admitted yeah, they agreed never to ask any political questions at all. [laughs]
Gabriel: Alan, I have a quick question. I know a couple of Masons or whatever but most specifically Prince Hall. I know a couple of brothers who are there. When you swear an oath in that, are you swearing an oath to Lucifer in your 1st, 2nd, 3rd degrees or whatever.
Alan: Yes. Pike makes it plain in Morals and Dogma. He said, Ďmake no mistake; our God is Lucifer.í He says that quite plainly in his own book. That was the bible of Freemasonry. The modern one is called the Bridge to Light. Itís kind of watered down tremendously. They even say at the start of it, itís because the public education is so poor now that people canít think or read so deeply as Morals and Dogma. However, Morals and Dogma still is the supreme one and thatís what they go by. Pike also said itís not necessary that they understand the symbols - remember, names are symbols as well - itís that the candidate doesnít have to understand the symbols; itís only important that he THINKS he understands what the symbols are.† So of course it is. Lucifer to them is the archangel of revolution and light, intellect, pure lightÖ but it has no human emotion. Thatís the eternal war of the two parts of the brain, the two parts of humanityÖ the psychopath and those who have humane feelings. Early Christianity used to put the serpent around the cross as Jesus went up and ascended to heaven.
Gabriel: So a Freemason is really Rosicrucianism?
Alan: Itís Rosicrucianism. Thereís no doubt. Masonry, Rosicrucianism, Cathars and so on are all terms used at different ages for the same movement.† It truly does believe in special selective breeding, superior types. The higher masons, 3rd generation especially, can go right up the grades very quickly, beyond the regular amount of degrees into the higher, the REAL grades. Youíre introduced to your wife whoís also raised in a Masonic household and taught by a local grandmaster, according to Rosicruciansí own books. I have them all here.
Gabriel: I talked to some Rosicrucians before. I got some ideas. Their idea of good and evil are kind of like you canít have one without the other. Theyíre kind of the same thing on two different ends of the spectrum. Theyíre the same thing in the same place or something kind of mentality.
Alan: Itís pure Cabalism. What theyíll always tell you and even this is taught in science because Cabalism is in science too. They tell you thereís no such thing as good and evil; something always benefits. So you always look to see what benefits. If something benefits, you can only say it was goodÖ regardless if you kill billions of people. If a few benefit, you must sacrifice the few to save the many, etc. These are all terms that come out of the Cabala.
Gabriel: Thank you Alan. I really appreciate your time.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Remember to tune into Rollye James tonight. Youíll see the link on my web site. Iím on in 1 hour. From Ontario, Canada, from Hamish and myself, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Appointing Who? Please Obama, Say It's Not So!" by Jeffrey Smith
(huffingtonpost.com) - July 23, 2009.
"U.S. - Insane Food Bill 2749 Passes House On 2nd Try: Totalitarian Control Of Our Food Supply" Farm Wars (axisoflogic.com) - Aug. 1, 2009.
"Hunger hits Detroit's middle class" (cnn.com) - Aug. 6, 2009.
Transcribed by Diana