June 16, 2009 (# 343)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 16, 2009:
Socialism -- What Thinkers Fear, the Gang's All Here:
"A Lesson to the World in All its Gory,
Portrayed in Video 'The Soviet Story,'
Shows Socialism's Machinations,
Including Mass Exterminations,
Western Elites Watched On with Glee,
This Totalitarian Utopia to be,
While Foundations Worked with Stealth and Verve
So Culture East and Culture West would Merge,
They'd Already Made the Above Decision,
Came Out in the Inquiry of the Reece Commission
Changing the Culture of the Western Realm,
Would be Led by Hollywood at the Helm,
And Certain Professors Given Free Range
To Preach Wonders of Socialism for Coming Change,
Now it's All Here, Cultural Cancers Systemic,
The Outcome of War Dialectic,
We're All Under the Gun of the Rich Men's Dream
As They Rid the 'Unfit,' Save the Few as the Cream"
© Alan Watt June 16, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - June 16, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 16th of June, 2009. For newcomers, look in to cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the web site you’ll find all the other sites I have. Eventually, in the not so distant future, the sites will get pulled. They’re already pulling sites across the world. I’ve had reports from different countries and different people who’ve simply had their sites yanked. The internet is tightening up. So go in to cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and pick you favorite one to keep downloading from and if one goes down, you can always try another one. And at alanwattsentientsentinel.eu you can also get the transcripts as well as the audio. These transcripts are written in the various languages of Europe.
I always tell people at the beginning that I don’t get paid for what I do. Most shows actually pay the host via the advertisers. That’s how it works, but if you do that you’re kind of limited as to what you do. In fact, often your guests that come on will simply be giving you an hour’s advertising, in reality, and the listeners don’t even realize that. So this way I’ve got an open hand to say what I want to say. I’m not responsible to people but I depend on YOU to keep me going and you can do so by looking at cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. See what’s for sale there. I have books I’ve written and so on. You can also donate to me on any of the web sites I have through PayPal or personal checks within the US and Canada. For the rest of the people who simply get the disks burned because they don’t like computers and I really don’t blame them at all. It’s a temporary thing, the computer and the internet, as it goes in to the next phase and I’ll be reading some articles tonight about that. You always get in touch with my by writing [listed above].
Remember the advertising you hear on the show goes to pay for the air time. It goes to pay for the staff, the engineers and so on. That’s where all of that money goes. So, it’s up to you to keep me going if you like what you hear.
I’ve gone on and on about the speed now, since 2001, our world has been turned upside-down. Not by happenstance because all countries don’t go in to action on the same agenda at the same time by chance. It doesn’t happen that way. That takes preparation and coordination to bring in a particular type of new system, which Mr. Brown said at the G20 meeting. He called it ‘The New World Order’. It’s funny how the big boys can call it that and anyone else is a conspiracy theorist, but that’s just the way it works.
What is this new world order? Well, it’s been widely written about by Fabian Socialists, The Royal Institute for International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations and a whole host of foundations that help back all the NGOs. It’s been written about for over 100 years, quite openly. It’s what they call their UTOPIA. It’s a transition phase as they go through, step by step, reduction of the population, especially those types that can’t adapt in to the new phase. That you’ll see, actually, in the video, The Soviet Story. It’s an excellent video. It’s one of the very few true exposés of what went on within the Soviet Union right up until the end. We have to understand that because it’s now being applied world wide. It’s a world Sovietized, or collectivized, society. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through The Matrix. In the last segment I mentioned The Soviet Story. It’s a video that can be bought. I have the link for the web site somewhere on my site. It does touch, at least, on what they call the SCIENCE of socialism. It’s never been explained. I grew up, remember, in the supposed Cold War. Very little was explained to the general public as to what Sovietization or communism was. Really, if you were at war with an enemy, surely to goodness, you’d explain to your own people why you were at war with it and point out all the bad bits about it, but they didn’t. They didn’t all through schooling. It simply wasn’t mentioned. You’d get a little piece in the newspaper about spies getting caught and stuff like that but that’s all we were taught. I used to wonder why.
Remember, in warfare - and George Orwell pointed this out in his book 1984 - they keep changing targets. In the Orwellian world, it was Eastasia and Westasia and Oceania. Before World War II, there were rumblings, at least in some places in Britain, about the dangers of communism, real communism. Everyone was very mixed up about it because the working class thought it was probably a good thing and they were taught, you see… they were taught that part, that socialism would help the working class. Nothing was further from the truth because socialism is just a slow method of introducing communism and big government. A world that would be governed, right down to every aspect of your life. That was the scientific socialist idea of people like Bertrand Russell and many others. To the working classes, they simply taught that they would be better off, they would have more rights, they would have more money in their pocket and so on. There’s no doubt about it, the unions did a good job, in certain areas, to bring up the paychecks of the big unions. However, no one really went in to communism.
You see, in communism, which is socialism in a hurry, you go in to social engineering very quickly. They already have their plan set out like a science, MASTERED on the old plans of Marx and Engels who wrote it up in London, The Communist Manifesto. The first thing they had to do was bring up the classes very quickly into a revolutionary spirit. Those ones that could NOT be brought up to revolutionary spirit would have to be completely disposed of. They wouldn’t have time to do it, they claimed, and there would be too much resistance from them. Now, who were these classes? The classes were those who were more independent by living on the land, primarily.
In the Soviet Story, you’ll hear one of the founding members of the Fabian Society and you’ll see him giving this speech. That was George Bernard Shaw. He was one of the co-founding members along with HG Wells and Lord Astor and their family. You’ll hear Shaw saying, you’ll have to come to us and explain why we should keep you alive. He says, just because you’re consuming doesn’t mean that you’re good. And he actually used the term ‘consumer-producer’ which is the United Nation’s term, official term, for a good global citizen. You must be both. Sure enough, they go into action right away as they did in the Soviet areas and they ANNIHILATED those peasants on the ground who gave the most resistance. They did not want to give up their way of life. They were completely self-sufficient and the Ukrainians were literally, purposely - and remember this, I mean PURPOSELY - and systematically starved to death by plan. Millions and millions and millions of them were starved to death. Their grain was taken from them and sold abroad by the Soviets. The following year, as they grew grain for the Soviets, the Soviets came in and took all that from them too. You’ll see these people starving, literally starving, to death BY PLAN.
The whole Western world was aware of what was happening there. Not one country lifted a finger to do anything about it, because, you see, World War II was coming up and there was some strange deal made somewhere along the line. I have no doubt on that whatsoever. Initially you had the Hitler/Stalin Pact where Germany was allied with the Soviets because they were both Socialists. In fact, Stalin taught and gave officers to Hitler to teach them how to go in to quick extermination since the Soviets had been at it for a long time. They were experts at it. Then of course, they turned on each other… whether by plan, design, who knows what. We’ll never get to the bottom of it. We’ll never get the truth. Then, Stalin became ‘Uncle Joe’ to the Western press. ‘Uncle Joe… We’re in it with Uncle Joe.’
These mass murderers who wanted to bring in world communism, remember, that meant extermination across the planet, of all the wrong sorts of people. It tied in exactly with the Fabian Society and the Royal Institute for International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, foundations, etc. That’s why we saved the Soviet Union. Patton was right, General Patton. He wanted to keep going through to the Soviet Union, don’t stop at Germany. He saw what was coming up, but he wasn’t in on, obviously, the big picture, the big plan. They always need an enemy, you see.
I can remember when the Beatles were sent over to do their tour of the Soviet Union. They came back and released an album, Back in the USSR. The first song was ‘Back in the USSR, don’t know how luck you are, boys. Back in the USSR.’ You’ll see in The Soviet Story, during that whole time, right up until the end, until the Berlin wall was brought down, they were still slaughtering people en masse… and dumping them in mass pits.
Why am I talking about this today? Because, if you understand what’s happening in the world, that’s all been altered by 9/11, you’re looking at the same HORROR coming down the pike, again. Because this is the big one. This is the BIG socialist program. There is no left wing. There’s no right wing. There’s only ONE organization here. There’s only been ONE for many, many years. Politics was a show to do with this.
It’s no coincidence, as I mentioned before, you must get in the whole culture industry. And these guys work Fabian style, intergenerationally. How long will it take us to breed and rear a generation of little psychopaths who will be in 20 years or so, 25 years, BIG psychopaths, adult psychopaths who can wear the uniforms and the black gear and beat the people up? Or kill them if necessary? In other words, take all emotional response and bonding from society in the meantime. How long will it take us to do that? Well, using all of the culture industry, the video games, etc and God knows how many movies, they’ve made the hero the winner. The winner is the guy who wears the black outfit. You don’t even have to have a personality for this character. He’s just the winner. And that’s what they all want to be today. Wearing the gear, bossing the rest of the public around.
Here’s the odd thing too. There’s been many studies done on this to do with prisoners and their keepers. The keepers despise the prisoners and the more the prisoners obey them, the more they despise them. There’s a sadomasochistic feeling to all of this, you see, and therefore it becomes easier, when they’re told to dispose of them. Lots of studies have been done on this. Lots of studies. Every science, remember, is used to bring in this new world order. They keep talking about a utopia. EVERY book in science fiction, futurism, etc has always had that wrapped up in it somewhere… this utopia. It’s wonderful, isn’t it, how they can program the victims of the next cleansing. THEY CAN PROGRAM THEM to actually look at this utopia that’s in the fictional novels and think it’s wonderful. Boy is that clever, eh? It’s that clever. Fantastic.
People should try and get a hold of The Soviet Story. Remember, all those bodies that you see getting dumped all over the place, in mass graves and off trucks and all the rest of it, were real people. No different from you or I. NO different. We see these things like some broken-down manikins and it doesn’t register. These are real people, just like your mum, your dad, your friends. They’re real people. That wasn’t that long ago. The same forces that caused that are united across the planet to drive us towards the same end, a vastly reduced population, the eradiation of all those with hereditary disease problems - they might be a burden on society; they mean the economy - so you eliminate them. Then they come in to this wonderful new utopia. Lenin discussed it in his books. Good books to read are by Lenin. He wrote more about this kind of stuff than probably anyone else. He discussed this. How this transformation stage… that you wouldn’t even need police eventually. Everyone who was left alive would be so virtuous and mature they wouldn’t need policing. Just like that; just like magic. That’s all part of this science of socialism, you see.
Since 2001, we’re getting trained and trained and trained and trained and trained to OBEY, OBEY, OBEY, OBEY. There’s one article I have tonight about another electrocution by cops. They call it tasering. I call it what it is. It’s electrocution. I was wondering why it was in the papers. It’s to train you to be scared now of cops. That’s what it’s in the papers for. Back with more after these messages.
I am Alan Watt and we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. Just before I go in to this article about the police electrocuting people with their new toys, going back to the Socialist idea of eradicating certain segments of society. When you look back, who was already doing that across the world? The exact same techniques? Using the same system as Karl Marx, discussed in his book, The Communist Manifesto? You find that London… I call it London rather than England because London RULED England. London, really, is a place unto itself. Especially the inner city where most of the world’s economy goes through. The Rothschild’s didn’t just own all the gold - standard, houses and so on - they owned all the metals. All the metals and ores that went through the world, all went through there… at least on paper for value, pricing and fixing. Incredible wealth went through there.
If you go back in to the 1700s and then into the 1800s, there was a father and then a son, both with the same name. I think it was John Stuart Mill who was a top economist for government and the Crown. One of his earliest books, John Stuart Mill had in it a LIST of people who would simply have to be eliminated because they would not ADAPT in to a modern economic system. Exactly as the Soviets went in to. In there, he had the American Indians written down. I’ve even got earlier books where they had the American Indians slated for extermination in the 1600s for the same reasons. They wouldn’t fit in to a modern economic system. However, Mill went even further. He went in to groups too. Then Wells and others of the same ilk, later on, came out with - and you’ll hear it in The Soviet Story from the mouth of the founder of the Fabian Society - the highlanders of Scotland and the Irish, of course.
Now, they’d already been doing it to both those people for centuries because these two people had something in common. They liked freedom. They were allergic to totalitarianism. They were also, even though they were fairly poor by economic standards, they were absolutely self-sufficient for their own needs. They didn’t often use money at all. The only reason they had to ever earn money was to pay taxes to government. They bartered a lot. They grew their own foods and so on and their own cattle. The true story of the famine of Ireland, it was a famine just like the Ukraine because the British… and I’ve got the history of it here. The British had THOUSANDS of troops in Ireland and they were guarding the ports and the roads to the ports and so on as they took the Irish beef and all the other animals for farming and all the other grains that they grew, off to Britain to feed THEIR armies abroad as they conquered the world. That’s what caused the so-called famine.
The same technique was used there, before the Soviets used it on the Ukraine. It was designed by whom? By people like Mill, a top economist. You see, it was already a science. Today, we hear about INTERdependence. We must all be INTERdependent. People think well, that’s our countries; we must be tied together in such a bond, no one can go it alone… manufacture and build themselves up into a war-mongering nation. No. It also means that every individual will be subservient to this one system for everything they need to live. That’s always been the agenda. Inter-personal inter-dependence.
They had the lists all drawn up. Hitler wasn’t the guy who came along with the first list. In fact, he copied the list. It was already written. Those who were independent. The Ukrainians really were so independent for everything they needed, they didn’t even need government, you see. And that’s a crime. That’s a crime… if you don’t need government… to take everything from you. How you can control the world eventually if people say we don’t need you?
Getting back to what I said about the police. There’s so many articles that have been in the newspapers IN EVERY COUNTRY. They’re almost trial balloons. They watch to see what the public response to these horrible stories are as the cops electrocute people with these taser guns. I think it’s to get us used to the idea and so we’ll be afraid of police. Since I haven’t seen any cop strung up by anything - after they’re being charged or anything - I think this is simply what it is. It’s predictive programming as they get us used to the idea that cops are just going to electrocute you if you don’t jump and hop to it when they order you… on anything. That’s what I think it is. There’s no doubt about it. These are the right kind of cops just like you’ve got the right kind of troops today. They’ve all been brought up with the worst kind of culture, if you want to call it culture at all… possibly… to be made for this time, this era, where you want brutes to attack the people.
This is from The Mail Online. I put my own words in, remember, because don’t be fooled by the words that they WANT you to use. It says, ‘A suspect is electrocuted three times by police before being punched? Where, the streets of New York? No, the streets of Nottingham.’ Why are they so surprised it’s in England? I’m not. They’re way ahead of everybody else. I’ll read this story when I come back from these messages.
I am Alan Watt back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, mentioning the fact that we’re being conditioned with almost everything that we see and hear from mainstream media. For so long now I’ve read articles about this so-called tasering - I just call it electrocution; that’s what it is - to get us used to the idea that it’s going to happen. We’ll see more and more of it happening in the future. The cops seem to get off with impunity and it tells the cops they CAN get away with it when their colleagues DO get away with it. It’s also training the public to be very, very afraid of these guys in the black executioner’s outfit. That’s why they wear black, you see, it’s the symbol of the old executioner. The old blue uniforms of the police are gone. Now they wear black. This article is from The Mail Online.
By James Slack
15th June 2009
There was fresh controversy over police methods last night after officers shot a man three times with a Taser gun (A: 50,000 volts.) and punched him repeatedly as he writhed on the ground.
Shocking footage shows one officer repeatedly stunning the 40-year-old man with the high-voltage weapon as he lies in the middle of a busy city centre.
His colleague then appears to punch the man with considerable force three times in the neck and shoulder.
Scroll down to watch the video
(A: It’s got a video on here too that you can watch.)
The footage shows the officer on the left tasering the suspect who writhes in agony on the floor as his colleague stands back and watches.
As a crowd gathers round the man, an onlooker is heard to shout: 'He don't look like he is resisting.' (A: Well, he wouldn’t be after getting 50,000 volts three times.)
The footage, captured by a taxi driver, was referred voluntarily to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (A: There’s no such thing as an Independent Police Complaints Commission. It’s made up by cops, retired cops generally.) by Nottinghamshire police, who said the man had earlier struck an officer. (A: So right away they’re giving you their impression, you see.)
But it sparked alarm over a decision by ex-Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to arm police with the stun guns, which fire two darts on the end of wires carrying a 50,000-volt shock.
She made 6,000 extra Tasers available to forces across the country only last month.
It also revived controversy over police tactics in the wake of allegations that officers assaulted protesters near the G20 summit in London, in April.
Then they go in to the pros and cons as usual, as we get trained that these are the NEW enforcers. See, they’re not police officers. They’re not peace officers. They’re now enforcers and you’d better jump to it or you’re in for a good old shock. That’s literally what it is. Training the public. Everything that you see that’s put out there, is to train the public. Even for me, when I read a lot of articles, I’m always so cautious. I try to get in another side of things too because I KNOW what the media’s job is. That’s why we’ve been kept so dumb and stupid for such an awful long time. The media has been given a free hand to condition us the way we’re supposed to be conditioned.
Now, FEMA - on the FEMA web site - they’re having an exercise coming up this year, National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09).
National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09) is scheduled for July 27 through July 31, 2009. NLE 09 will be the first major exercise conducted by the United States government that will focus exclusively on terrorism prevention and protection, as opposed to incident response and recovery.
NLE 09 is designated as a Tier I National Level Exercise. Tier I exercises (formerly known as the Top Officials exercise series or TOPOFF) are conducted annually in accordance with the National Exercise Program (NEP), which serves as the nation's overarching exercise program for planning, organizing, conducting and evaluating national level exercises. The NEP was established to provide the U.S. government, at all levels, exercise opportunities to prepare for catastrophic crises ranging from terrorism to natural disasters.
This year the U.S. one will also involve troops from Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom.
I’ll put these links up on my site at the end of the show, cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can look them up for yourselves. Here’s a little twist as well. I’ve always told you that the United Nations is nothing more than a front organization TO BRING IN this world collectivist society and to be, at least, the FIRST global government. Here’s an article here from the BBC news.
Ambassador to become new MI6 boss
(A: The United Nations ambassador from Britain for the last few years TO the United Nations is now to become the new MI6 boss.)
Sir John Sawers will take up his post early in November
Britain's ambassador to the United Nations is to become the new chief of MI6, Downing Street has announced.
Sir John Sawers, 52, will head the overseas Secret Intelligence Service (A: That’s like the CIA there.) in November, replacing Sir John Scarlett.
The departing boss spent more than five years in the post, having switched from his role leading the Joint Intelligence Committee just before the Iraq war. (A: They’re doing a lot of switching right now of anyone involved in setting up the planning for the Iraqi war… because there’s a big inquiry coming up. It won’t go anywhere, though, so they’re not worried.)
Prime Minister Gordon Brown's spokesman said the departing Sir John had done "an important and valuable job".
He had made a real contribution to protecting Britain from international terrorism and other global threats, the spokesman added.
He also said Sir John Scarlett's move was in no way connected to the impending inquiry into the Iraq war (A: Of course, chuckle, chuckle.), at which he is likely to be a key witness. (A: By the way, they’re holding it in secret… [laughs] the inquiry.)
Foreign Secretary David Miliband welcomed the appointment, stressing the importance of the role.
"International terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the growth of regional conflict and instability mean that there has never been a time when the skills and dedication of our intelligence agencies, including SIS, have been more necessary to our national security and the safety of our people around the world," he said. (A: The standard PR stuff.)
Alluding to the time when the chief of the SIS would have been known as 'C' to keep his identity secret, Mr Miliband said "I take this opportunity to pay tribute to Sir John Scarlett's outstanding record as 'C' over more than five years in the post. (A: Then they say how wonderful it is.)
BBC Security Correspondent Frank Gardner says the appointment is a sign of how far MI6 has come into the open. (A: Oh… chuckle, chuckle, chuckle. [laughs] Such rubbish they tell us eh?)
He said Sir John Sawers was a highly recognisable figure and a career diplomat, unlike the incumbent Sir John Scarlett who played a key role in espionage against the Soviets. (A: Yeah. Chuckle, chuckle. Then they give you the history of this incoming fellow.)
You know something? We know nothing, nothing about how things are run in the world. Not a darned thing. Nothing to do with geo-politics or anything else. We know nothing. We’re kept in the dark with everything. Even these articles I read to do with shocking the public with taser guns and stuff. Look at all these boob babes all down the right hand side. What’s that got to do with the story? It’s to trivialize everything into this surrealistic impression that nothing’s real, even the horrible stuff. That’s what it’s all about. That’s what it’s all about.
Here’s a good article. I’ve mentioned before, I think it was Henderson and Gillespie who did a lot of psychiatric evaluations and studies back in the 60s and 70s in the UK. They found in the first ever study of higher-level psychopaths… before that they’d all studied the ones at the bottom that ended up in prisons for smashing jewelers’ windows in and robbing. They also studied the higher psychopaths, the ones that are BORN into powerful families, wealthy families and who end up in politics, etc. Well, here’s one to verify the previous study. This from the Los Angeles Times.
Politicians share personality traits with serial killers: Study
(latimes.com) - June 15, 2009 / Andrew Malcolm
Using his law enforcement experience and data drawn from the FBI's behavioral analysis unit, Jim Kouri has collected a series of personality traits common to a couple of professions.
Kouri, who's a vice president of the National Assn. of Chiefs of Police (A: Which is a UN organization.), has assembled traits such as superficial charm (A: They always CHARM their victims.), an exaggerated sense of self-worth (A: Well, that‘s Tony Blair.), glibness, lying (A: That’s all Tony Blair.), lack of remorse (A: That’s definitely Tony Blair.) and manipulation of others. (A: That’s Tony Blair… and every other politician I can think of, to be honest with you.)
These traits, Kouri points out in his analysis, are common to psychopathic serial killers. (A: And you don’t have to be a serial killer either. These traits are common to top business executives who’ve clawed their way up.)
But -- and here's the part that may spark some controversy and defensive discussion -- these traits are also common to American politicians. (Maybe you already suspected.)
Yup. Violent homicide aside, our elected officials often show many of the exact same character traits as criminal nut-jobs, who run from police but not for office.
Kouri notes that these criminals are psychologically capable of committing their dirty deeds free of any concern for social, moral or legal consequences and with absolutely no remorse. (A: Absolutely no remorse. I was reading an article the other day where that little girl that was put in - she was all over the papers for torturing the Iraqis - has a book out apparently, and she said, in this newspaper article, that she felt no remorse whatsoever. She said, after all, they were our enemies and blah, blah. That justified it. She felt no guilt or remorse as to the awful things that they did with them. So SHE’S a psychopath, you see. They’re at all levels of society. It says, free of any concern for social, moral or legal consequences and with absolutely no remorse. You think about these guys that plan mass murders, in countries. And they do… kill off millions of people. Remember what total war means and taking out the infrastructure - that’s all ability to get water and food and so on - and let people starve to death. Look at what happened in Iraq. That’s what they did. Madeline Albright came out and when it was 500,000 that had died of starvation and so on. She was asked if that was acceptable and she says absolutely… without a blink. Psychopaths, you see.)
"This allows them to do what they want, whenever they want," he wrote. "Ironically, these same traits exist in men and women who are drawn to high-profile and powerful positions in society including political officeholders."
Good grief! And we not only voted for these people, we're paying their salaries and entrusting them to spend our national treasure in wise ways. (A: Well, I’m not.)
We don't know Kouri that well. He may be trying to manipulate all of us with his glib provocative pronouncements. On the other hand ...
"While many political leaders will deny the assessment regarding their similarities with serial killers and other career criminals, it is part of a psychopathic profile that may be used in assessing the behaviors of many officials and lawmakers at all levels of government."
This just verifies what’s already been verified before. You know these guys at the top can plan this. Remember the Project for a New American Century and all the guys that were in it before the Gulf War came along, before Bush got in to office. They all belong to this organization where they had the future wars all laid out and planned… and made them happen. These guys don’t take sleeping pills or tranquilizers. They can live with this… quite easily. They can go to their theater at night… because that’s a psychopath. And YES, as that book Political Ponerology that I’ve read from on the air says, these characters are intergenerational. If you have a male and a female BOTH with the same traits, there’s a darned good chance that the offspring will be too. Especially if they’re brought up in the culture of the psychopathic parents. Interesting, eh?
Now, here’s an interesting article too. This is from The Mail Online. Now, broadband… we’ve all heard this vague term broadband. I knew years ago from a guy who knows, who works for British Telecom installing phones and lines and all the rest of it. He said, you know we can put broadband in now if we wanted to without even altering the wires. Anyway, they’re bringing this high speed internet in AS they phase out commercial radio and every other alternate way of getting the media. This is from The Mail Online.
£6 'broadband tax' on every home in Britain
to fund national rollout of superfast internet
(A: So they’re going to charge the victims, again, for this new thing that’s going to enslave them even further. If you know too, all of this is going to be for more monitoring of the public, FASTER DATA COLLECTION ON THE PUBLIC. This is what it’s for. So the victims pay for it. £6 a year. That like $12 a year.)
By Paul Revoir and Liz Thomas
17th June 2009
Every family with a telephone line could be hit with a £6-a-year tax to pay for the roll-out of 'superfast broadband', the Government said yesterday. (A: That’s what I love about the governments in Britain. You couldn’t tell from the announcements on the BBC, when they read out on the radio their announcements from different departments of government, you couldn’t tell the difference between that and Radio Moscow. It’s just dictates from above. One after another.)
Gordon Brown claimed that faster internet access was 'an essential service as indispensable as electricity, gas and water'.
The creation of the new tax follows the publication of the Digital Britain report into the future of internet, television, radio and telephone provision in this country. (A: What they want to do, you see, is put ALL this through one system, to be monitored more easily by the authorities. That’s telephone, fax, internet, everything through the one system. That’s the purpose of it.)
The document, overseen by outgoing communications minister Lord Carter, also proposed that the BBC should share the licence fee with its commercial rivals.
And from 2013, £5 from every licence fee could be used (A: This is how they take the money from you and use it for other things.) to pay for programming (A: I love how they say this.) such as regional news and children's shows (A: Well, they’ll program the children all right.) on other channels.
There are also plans for a crackdown on internet piracy and the switch-off of traditional analogue radio by 2015.
However, it was the plan to charge everyone with a fixed phone line an extra £6 a year which drew the most comment.
Individuals of all ages - even those who do not know what 'superfast broadband' means - will have to find the extra cash every year until 2017. (A: Come on. They’re not going to stop in 2017.)
Over a seven-year period the scheme is expected to raise £1.05billion from the public.
The public are wonderful aren’t they? The public are so kind as to just keep giving and giving and giving… even when they ain’t got anything, they just keep giving and giving. That’s the public for you. That’s socialism. The government demands and you pay up. That’s socialism. That’s what it is. And the public never really catch on to it.
Now, there’s a phone call from Dave in Arizona. Are you there Dave?
Dave: Alan, I saw a really good movie. It’s called, There Will Be Blood.
Alan: Yes. I saw that one.
Dave: It’s pretty good.
Alan: It’s an excellent portrayal of a psychopath.
Dave: Of an elitist. Okay. You want me to hang on?
Alan: Hang on and we’ll talk about it after the break. Back in a moment.
I am Alan Watt and we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix talking to Dave from Arizona about a movie which does portray a psychopath and all his… I can’t say good qualities. It does it in a very good way and that was Daniel Day Lewis, excellent actor for that kind of role. He’s able to do it very well. People should see that movie to show you. It’s about an oil man starting off, really, and how he does it and how he KNOWS what the public expect to see when he’s getting money raised for the oil and so on. He had a son with him… and even that turns out to be quite an eye-opener at the end of the movie. He uses everybody to do his own bidding. He’s a complete psychopath in reality, but he had these gifts that all psychopaths have. They can charm people. They can manipulate others to do their work for them… and they get to the top because they’re utterly ruthless in reality.
Dave: He seemed like the kind of guy that was kind of normal in the beginning and then once he got the power, it sort of just overcame him.
Alan: Until you realize that even the son he presents to local town councils that raised the money for the oil and so on… The son, he simply picked up on the way and made up a story about the wife dying because they expected family men. And he’s a man with his child and all the rest of it. A very human quality. In reality, he didn’t give a darn about the child except for its usefulness to him.
Dave: It was a good selling tool.
Alan: He used it to the maximum. It’s not till the end of the story he tells the son this. He says, I picked you up on the way. [laughs]
Dave: He was an orphan. [laughs]
Alan: That’s right, but that’s how a psychopath is. They do intuitively understand what the public WANT to see. They don’t sit and puzzle over it but they intuitively know how to present themselves to the public and what the public wants to see and hear. That’s why they go in to politics.
Dave: They’re just good actors.
Alan: Very good actors and they have no conscience. That’s why they can promise everything and fulfill nothing. They have no conscience at all. In fact, the few books by honest guys who’ve left politics that talk about it say that the average person couldn’t be a politician because during election time any dirt that can be throw on you and any skeletons that are pulled out of the closet would SHAME the ordinary person. You’d run off the stage and never show your face again. However, because the psychopath will defend their ego AT ALL COSTS - their ego is all important - then it runs off their back like water from a duck’s back. That’s how it runs off them. It’s doesn’t effect them at all.
Dave: They’re definitely above morals and they’re above the regular human conscience.
Alan: Absolutely. Absolutely. Way above it. It isn’t till even the lower psychopaths are caught…. They’re very good up until they’re caught and then they’re so happy to tell the public or the news how they did it, how they got away with this and this and this, because they truly believe that they’re superior to everyone else. To an extent they are because they’ve always gotten what they wanted by using the people, using the system and generally getting away with it. They’re almost like sharks, in a sense, they’re programmed like sharks to simply go in to society and utilize ordinary, decent people to the maximum for their own benefits. They’re prime survivors. They’ll wipe out whole countries to save themselves if need be.
Dave: Thanks, Alan.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Fascinating study. As I say, Political Ponerology is an excellent book to get a hold of.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in
Video: "The Soviet Story (Padomju stasts)" [Hear a member of the Fabian Society talk about eliminating "the unfit". Socialism is Nazism and Communism.] 1:25:48 - March 11, 2009.
"A suspect is tasered three times by police before being punched? New York? No, the streets of Nottingham" by James Slack (dailymail.co.uk) - June 15, 2009.
"FEMA: National Level Exercise 2009 (NLE 09)" (at dhs.gov).
"Ambassador to become new MI6 boss" (news.bbc.co.uk) - June 16, 2009.
"Oh-oh! Politicians share personality traits with serial killers: Study" (latimes.com) - June 15, 2009.
"£6 'broadband tax' on every home in Britain to fund national rollout of superfast internet" by Paul Revoir and Liz Thomas (dailymail.co.uk) - June 17, 2009.
Transcribed by Diana