May 25th, 2009 (#327)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 25th, 2009:
Concealed Misanthropy of Philanthropy:
"Philanthropists in New York, Secret Meeting,
Regarding Population Growth, They're Bleating,
The Charitable Acts a Distortion,
They're Funding Vasectomies, Ligations, Abortion,
Doublespeak Oration with Each Breath
Hides Their Social Policy of Death,
Do-Gooding and Killing Fused,
Leaves the Public Admiring Yet Confused,
It's a Skillful Technique Taught to Those Who Seek,
A Future Bright, Not So Bleak,
Where Those Who are Fittest to Survive
Will have a Nice Empty World Where They'll Thrive"
© Alan Watt May 25th, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - May 25th, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, on the 25th of May, 2009. I always suggest for newcomers, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many talks I've given in the past as you wish, where I try to basically give you the shortcuts to understanding reality, the big picture of the system that runs our entire planet, and it's agenda, because it does have an agenda. Nothing is left to chance, if you already rule the world, you must plan the future and make it happen. It's very simple. You can also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download for print up, and they're written in the various languages of Europe. Now, I've often said to people that they bring the show to themselves in a sense, and those who contribute actually bring it to thousands of others, who don't. But, it's about time that people start to donate to help me out, because I have to bring up new websites, because this weekend I had two of the websites pulled by yahoo, and cuttingthroughthematrix.com right now is transferring you to cuttingthrough.jenkness.com, because of these two systems being yanked. On Thursday I couldn't upload to the .net, and then it was on the Friday, I couldn't upload to the .com, and it's taken yahoo all weekend to find out this amazing problem, that must be pretty unique, especially since they actually set me back from the old limit, which was 10 gigs maximum, per month, and I changed it on the 11th of May to unlimited, and they accepted that, and yet, when it rolled over they put me on less than 7 gigs, max, and that's why the sites weren't working. Trying to fix it all is one big mystery, apparently. So I can take it for granted, someone inside yahoo has got the nod to simply cause harassment, and probably unknown to the rest of them there, because the NSA has already admitted, they have people working within every major server. That's how the real world works. And if you are speaking out about the truth, and showing documentation to people without going off into cuckoo land, then you will be harassed if you haven't been authorized to be up there, speaking to the people. You will definitely get harassed.
My mail is interesting, because for months and months, it arrives with a rubber band, like a package around it. I watched the mailman putting the letters in, one at a time, everybody else's box, but mine, they're already wrapped in a rubber band. The reason is, because you see, I get them late. They go somewhere else to be read before I receive them. This is the reality of the real world. As I say, if you're not authorized to be out there, leading you off in circles, and you're getting through to people, and making a difference to people, you will get harassed. Take it for granted, you'll also lose friends, who will become terrified to be associated with you. That's real world too. Therefore, it's up to you, the listeners to keep me going, by going into, as I say, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, although you'll be transferred to jenkness website, who's carrying the whole load right now. And you can donate to me or buy the books I have for sale on cuttingthroughthematrix.com. That as I say, keeps me going. It's very expensive to keep all of this going. And I'll have to get even more sites, because if one server pulls the whole lot, which they can do at any time, and they've given me ample proof they can do it, then others can do the same, when they get the nod. If you want this kept up there, help me keep it going. If you don't donate, I'll know that it's game over. Be back in a few minutes, after these messages.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. I let the guitar wail a bit, because I'm in a wailing mood tonight, because of the hassles I get, just keeping this going here. There's never, ever a quiet moment. There's never a period of relaxation. It's seven days a week, literally. And the hassle over this weekend, having to transfer everything over to other sites, because yahoo basically, rather than put me on unlimited, has set me back for some reason to about 7 gigs max, for the month. And I couldn't upload to two sites. And they were totally bewildered, how it happened, and how to fix it. The .com is still down, ever since Friday. So you have the creme de la creme at yahoo, trying to figure out this problem, and it's just one big, incredible mystery, isn't it? You see, that's what real hassle is. Real hassle, when someone's been told to create a bit of harassment for you, until you get the message. They don't like to strong-arm tactic you, and I've had that in the past, when these SUVs with the tinted windows would drive up at night, when I'm walking the dog, with their lights off, and just sit 20 feet from you and stare at you. And then back all the way back to the main road, going backwards, putting their lights on and going away, night after night. This is harassment to threaten you off, you see. And there's plenty of it. Same thing with my telephone calls, they often get dropped. Sometimes you'll hear them clicking away on the line. And as I say, my mail, the paper mail gets delivered, just me with a rubber band around them all, because they've all been read before. Peter Wright talked about that. He worked for MI5, and he said the same thing. He says, you know, the post office has official departments set up, where certain people's mail is redirected. And they open everything. Read it or copy it, and put it in brand new envelopes, new stamps, from the world, with the rubber stamps too, and send it on its way again. Old, old stuff, that's been going on for an awful long time. Because for every service that they have, there's an ulterior motive, and the postal service, from its inception was one of them with an ulterior motive.
So those of you, who are getting a lot out of these talks, should certainly help keep it going. Because there is no agenda here. There's no spin. I don't tell you you're going to get anything back, or get an old country back, or an old system back, because I tell you that it can't be done. Since everything is run on commerce, economics, and since the powers that be, who run economics and own most of it, decided to uproot all the industry from the Western hemisphere into China, well, how are you going to make them bring it all back? How are you going to do it? And in economics, if you just have a service economy, you're just passing things around that someone else manufactured. And all wealth comes from labor and manufacture. That's the sad story of the world. So as I say, keep it going by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You'd be redirected, and I'm putting other sites up. That costs money, and time. More time to upload on supposedly the fake high speed that I get, with satellite upload. I also by the way, I should mention this too, that I'm on Xplornet, which is owned by Hughes corporation, the big military boys, because they share the satellite with the military. And I've been getting slow uploads for about a year now, or more. And the last letter I got back from them after the last complaint, said that you may have exceeded your bandwidth for uploads. They called it, you may have exceeded your fair use policy. Well, they won't tell you what their limit for fair use is. It's up to them, you see. If I was authorized to be speaking out to the people, and getting a paycheck in the back, or in the back door, I'd have no problems at all. In fact, I'd have all the help I could get, believe you me. So keep me going. And you know how to donate. You're getting all this stuff for free, and those who do pay for it, at least keep me going, so that thousands who should help out can hear it too. There's also a lot of unemployed people who can't afford it, so you help them to hear it as well.
Now, last week I mentioned about the billionaires, the philanthropists, as they love to call themselves, these high Masonic types, who were created and brought up to be extremely wealthy people. Because in reality, behind the facade of charity, they are social/political organizations. And what better way to direct a world beyond politics or politicians in Parliament and Senates and Congresses, what better way than to bypass it completely with having massive wealth, where you fund huge lobby groups, and non-governmental organizations, under the guise of charity. As long as you hand a few candies out, once in a while, then it's under the guise of charity. I mentioned last week, that these boys are all to do with eugenics. That's what they're into. They always have been. And they made no bones about it earlier in the twentieth century, and right through to the 1960s in fact, what their prime motive was. So last week I mentioned, that the meeting that was held in New York with Bill Gates and Rockefeller, etc, was to do with population reduction. And I saw some of the fake, the good, good old boy write-ups that they had in other newspapers, with the nonsense that they were getting together because eccentric billionaires were trying to find ways of giving all that money away. They just didn't have enough ways to do it. That was the sort of rubbish that the good boys, the good guys who give them the nod and the wink, and who stand with the square, will write up for them. Here's the real story, here.
Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
(Alan: And this is from the Times Online, by John Harlow. And it says:)
SOME of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education.
(A: Now, see, there's your dichotomy right there. They want to curb the growth of the world's population, and we know that most of their money when you trace it into the United Nations etc, and all the NGO groups around the United Nations, is into basically family planning with sterilization and abortion, you see. So why would they care about your health and your education? It's a cover, you see.)
The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
(A: Well, remember this is the century of change, and these boys know what it's really all about, since they and their think tanks planned it. They own governments, these boys. They own them. And everybody in government knows that by the way. You know, when the prohibition was on, the big con to raise billions of dollars through black marketeering of booze, back in the 1920s, families like the Bronfmans, that's Yiddish for Whiskey Man, by the way, went into the whiskey industry, and when his brother, when Sam's brother was charged with murdering a cop, I think it was in Canada, he says, oh, he'll get off with it. And the guy, the reporter, says, How will he get off with it? And Sam Bronfman says, because I put every stinking politician in power. Nothing has changed. Sot it's been:)
Described as the Good Club (A: See, it's the Good Club.) by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros (A: He's a front man for Rothschild), the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, (A: And by the way, George Soros had a half page in a British paper a few years ago, where he and two buddies crashed the economy of Britain, so they could reap massive harvests on the stock market. And he got away with it. There's no charges for that. There's no crime to do that. And he boasted about how he did it. So he's a philanthropist, you see.) mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
These members, along with Gates, have given away more than £45 billion (A: That's about 90 billion dollars) since 1996
(A: Now how could I, or you, or anybody out there who's trying to tell the people the truth, compete with organizations that give out £45 billion, or $90 billion to their NGOs, that are radical social political engineers. How can you compete? See, you can't. They own the system. And yes they are secret societies. Rockefeller himself gives out global citizenship awards. He's been doing it for years. Well, long before anyone else heard about the global system. Is this mentioned in any parliament or anything? No. Well, how come this guy can mention things and push them, and they can come to be, and then they're backed up by governments? Remember, the Rockefeller's own the land. They gave it to the United Nations, that the U.N. buildings are built on. They own it. So it says here.)
They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at “security briefings”.
Well, they are at security briefings, for the world system. They own the whole security system, as well. I'll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading an article about the Billionaires Club, the wonderful philanthropists that all started off, as criminals basically, like the Rockefellers, as they disposed of all their rivals in the oil industry, with Standard Oil. Incredible dirty tricks. And the old grand pop, of course, had lots of people killed, miners killed, and their families, when he got the troops out to mow them down with machine guns at the Ludlow massacre. And then they turned him into a philanthropist, because it was time you see, to change the image, and use all that loot, that they'd been allowed to garnish, for the political motives that they were established for in the very first place. Because, these guys didn't become billionaires by just hard work and thrift. There are incredibly powerful organizations which set them up, back them, and protect them. Same as Mr. Bill Gates. And I've said before too, that if you really believe that Bill Gates is a self-made billionaire, well you should go off and talk to the little green men from Mars. It doesn't happen that way. They don't allow people to come up from the bottom, unless they've chosen them. And even then, you must pay back your master. And that's what Bill Gates is doing with his philanthropy. That's how it really, really is. It says here:
Some details were emerging this weekend, however. The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests. (A: Their interests)
The issues debated included reforming the supervision of overseas aid spending to setting up rural schools and water systems in developing countries.
(A: What they mean is, they set up schools just for women. Because the whole idea, and the communists used this tactic, was to bypass the men completely. The U.N. will give grants to women only, to make sure that they become independent. The guys are out of the picture, and they feel neglected. They turn to booze, basically. Look what happened with the Soviets when they all crashed. Look at all the Russian women, and all the other women from the Soviet Bloc, looking for husbands outside the Soviet Bloc, because they were taught to despise, despise their own men. So it says here, they debated, etc:)
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.
(A: And there's Gates prattling on, he's out to save people from malaria. Don't you believe it. Because in their eyes, the more malaria, the better. It kills off more people in those countries. It says:)
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.
(A: That's their real goal. And if you trace their money, it goes to the U.N. organizations, you'll find that that's where it goes to: sterilization, vasectomies, tubal ligations, and abortion. A political agenda. It says:)
This could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values.
Well, you see, what they mean is, the people in the Third World have noticed the mess the West is in, where all these same things were introduced. And they don't want to go in the same direction. So that's what they're really all about. It's a political organization, that you cannot compete with, because, if you can get 40 or 50 billion pounds, or $90 billion dollars to pay your hundreds or thousands of non-governmental organizations and lobby groups, then you might have a chance to compete with them. Otherwise, we're whistling in the dark. They get instant access to media, to mainstream world media. Instant access, on anything that they open their mouths about. Can you do that? Of course you can't do that. They can get access to any politician, prime minister, or president, instantly. Can you do that? No. But the world they're bringing in is a totalitarian system, because they run it in a sense on the principles of secular humanism, that man is capable of doing anything. Therefore, since you're capable of doing anything in the right circumstances, you would all do the wrong thing. Therefore, you have to be steered by Big Brother, who must treat you as children, and can never tell you the truth, because you don't tell children the ultimate truths. That's as simple as it can be. Secular humanism is the system that they also used in the Soviet system as well. One person at one end of the country commits a crime, then you're all capable of committing this crime. Therefore you ban this, or you ban that. Collective punishment, it's called. And this article here ties right in with it. This is from the BBC News, 22nd of May:
Camera grid to log number plates
(A: Now we all know that they introduced it again to familiarize the public with cameras for a little while, and give them some nice lie that it's all only for crossroads, etc, intersections where there's occasional accidents. We'll have good proof of who caused it, etc. That's how every country in the world had this sold to them. Here's the real purpose. This is:)
By Richard Bilton
The BBC has learned a national network of cameras monitoring Britain's roads will be in place within months. (A: Will be in place within months, do you think it's not already started and done, really?)
A national network of cameras and computers automatically logging car number plates will be in place within months, the BBC has learned.
Thousands of Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras are already operating on Britain's roads. (A: This is going to be worldwide, because they're doing it in Canada too. Back with more after these messages.)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading an article of how they're linking together all those CCTV cameras from city to city, town to town, into one giant system for the police to monitor every single person, twenty-four hours a day on the roads. It says here:
Thousands of Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras are already operating on Britain's roads.
Police forces across England, Wales and Scotland will soon be able to share the information on one central computer.
Officers say it is a useful tool in fighting crime, but critics say the network is secretive and unregulated.
(A: They had this plan when they first gave the cameras out to put on the crossroads, as I say. They knew where they were going before the public even saw the first camera go up. Because they had to plan this century of change. This totalitarian century was planned an awful long time ago. But you can't tell the children. Tell them it's for crossroads only, let them get used to it, then put more up, and they'll get used to that too. That's the Fabian way, you see. Adaptation. We're a great species for adapting to the ridiculous.)
Kent's Chief Constable, Michael Fuller, commented: "We've seen an increase of some 40% of arrests since we've been using this technology.
"I'm very confident that we're using it properly and responsibly, and that innocent people have nothing to fear from the way we use it."
(A: I like how they always put that in. Innocent people. Meaning if you're good. Good means obeying all the laws, and all the new laws that come out by the day. You see? How far can you bend? And that's what it means. It doesn't matter how innocent you are, and how good you are, you're breaking laws all the time, and you don't even know it. They know it. If they want you, and they’re going to target you, they'll just pick one of them. I'll have to get those videos up on that ex-cop, who's now a paralegal, who tells you that the public are stupid, he says. Because they blurt everything out that the cop wants to hear. And then he tells you all the different reasons why the public are stupid. And he says, we can follow anybody, and make them fearful. You know you're getting followed by a cop. And you're going to make a mistake one way or another, or swerve your car, a little bit to the left or to the right, and that's enough to stop you. So be as good as you want, they're going to get you too. If they need the tickets that day, and that's their quota. It says:)
A number of local councils are signing up their Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
(A: That's city and town. So they start them off in the cities, at crossroads, they spread out across the whole city, and then, now they're doing the next part, which is an amalgamation of all the systems into one. See how beautiful it all works out at the end, isn't it. It says, and they're calling this the ANPR network, this combined system.)
As long as the cameras are technically good enough, they can be adapted to take the software.
(A: Of course they are, because they planned it all in advance.)
In towns such as Bradford, Portsmouth and Luton that means greater coverage for the police and more journeys captured and recorded.
(A: The love the word, captured.)
John Dean, who is co-ordinating the ANPR network for the Association of Chief Police Officers,
(A: By the way, the Association of Chief Police Officers is a United Nations organization. A private organization, but all the chief police belong to it. They've got their own TV network from the UN. It says:)
"It's the finest intelligence-led policing tool we've got.
"It covers so many different areas from crime reduction, crime detection to road safety and everything in between."
(A: What would they do without roads, eh? Can you imagine the money they scoop in every day across the planet from roads? Incredible, eh? It says:)
But not everyone thinks it is such a good thing.
John Catt found himself on the wrong side of the ANPR system. He regularly attends anti-war demonstrations outside a factory in Brighton, (A: [clicking of the tongue]) his home town.
It was at one of these protests that Sussex police put a "marker" on his car. (A: A marker.) That meant he was added to a "hotlist".
(A: Oh boy, this is better than the Soviet Union. You know, once this is all over, anyone that's left, that they haven't killed can write amazing books about it. It says:)
This is a system meant for criminals but John Catt has not been convicted of anything and on a trip to London, the pensioner found himself pulled over by an anti-terror unit.
"I was threatened under the Terrorist Act. I had to answer every question they put to me, and if there were any questions I would refuse to answer, I would be arrested. I thought to myself, what kind of world are we living in?"
(A: Well, you know now, don't you?)
Sussex police would not talk about the case.
(A: That's straight out of the Soviet Union. These public servants won't talk about it.)
The police say they do not know how many cameras there are in total, and they say that for operational reasons they will not say where the fixed cameras are positioned.
By the way, they passed a law as well that they can actually put a chip in your car for tracking. A little magnetic one. You won't know anything about it. So they make anything legal. See, totalitarianism is legal, you just simply make it legal. You pass a law to say this act is legal. That's what it is. Not bad, eh? Not bad at all.
And I've been telling people in the U.S. about the Socialized medicine, this wonderful factory system where you walk in, and you grab a number, a big number, that's about, oh 3" or 4" by 4. You're like a cow there. At least in cows they put it in their ear. You just stand and hold this thing. And you have your little number until you're called. And that might be that day, or they might tell you to come back the next day. Or the doc might get called away from the clinics that they have, and that's it, come back sometime this week and start all over again. And they always tell you when they open in the morning, so you can make a day of it. And then you meet some total stranger you'll never see again, because they always replace them with another total stranger, who has as much interest in you, as Bill Gates has in the poor. And they know nothing about your medical history. Under the United Nations, remember, and we've all signed on to the U.N., they're guaranteeing that every peasant will be guaranteed the minimal healthcare possible. That's in their charter. Go and read it.
And Socialized medicine is an authority, you see. It's not a service anymore, it's an authority. And they've got to get all these poison jabs into you. Knowing full well, that a good percentage of the public, because of their genetic makeup, will react very badly to these shots, and have autistic children, or children who are completely allergic to everything, and then there's a whole host of other syndromes and symptoms, combined with it. But that's your problem, for having defective mitochondrial DNA, you see. That's what they say.
No jabs, no school says Labour MP
(A: This is also from the BBC News.)
Children who have not received all their vaccinations should not be allowed to start school, a Labour MP has suggested.
Speaking in the left-wing Fabian Society magazine, (A: Ha, ha. The Fabian society magazine. A private organization, remember. So this woman is also a politician, is also a member of this social/political private organization, that's funded by the big boys that I just mentioned before.) Mary Creagh said the move would increase the uptake of the controversial MMR vaccine. (A: Now they're gong to force the people to take it.)
In the same article, public health expert Sir Sandy Macara suggests linking child benefits to vaccinations. (A: In other words, if you don't have your child vaccinated, then you won't get your child benefits. I love how they use fairness, and fair play, these people.)
The government says it has no plans to introduce compulsory vaccinations.
The rest of the story is almost negation of the last statement. Because they are going to. In fact, in the States, they do. Some States. I know you can't get into the university in New York there, unless you've had all your shots, and they do check up on it. And if they can't find it, they'll make you take it. Not bad, eh. Totalitarianism. As I say, what a harvest of information on the most ultimate totalitarian system ever to exist on the planet, so that the few survivors can write these amazing books about it and how bad it was. Way, way superior to the stories of the Gestapo in Germany, or the KGB in Russia. This is way beyond that, this is the real stuff, the real thing. And again, according to Plato, remember and his Republic, and all these monsters at the top read Plato, he was a sort of guiding force to them, with his book the Republic, where they'd engineer people to be perfect slaves, and they would serve this master guardian class. Who are the guardian class? They're the ones who own the world, and it's their responsibility they deem to take care of everything in nature. And they'd have all the peasants down below specially bred for special tasks. Today it's called genetic modification, or they might even call it enhancement. He also mentioned that women would be in a separate class for the military caste, he says. And women would be brought in to fight alongside the men in the same capacities, and hopefully they would stay together, and they would breed, just like Hitler's master plan. They'd breed with each other to keep the military system going with the right stuff.
Women's front-line role reviewed
Ministers are to consider changing the rules limiting women's combat roles in the armed forces, the BBC has learned.
A review will be launched to examine whether female soldiers should be included in units whose key role is to seek out and kill the enemy.
The review is partly due to EU (A: Economic Union) rules on equality which require reassessment of the issue every eight years.
The Ministry of Defence said it has an open mind, but one former Army chief said integration would harm operations.
To date there have been seven women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, which equates to 2% of the total fatalities.
There are few roles in the military which remain off-limits to female personnel. (A: They like them in torture, by the way.) They are engaged in highly dangerous tasks such as flying attack helicopters, driving in military convoys and are often part of foot patrols.
(A: As I say, they love to use them in torture, against men. It's a psychological thing as well. Plus it trains these women to get roles in movies, certain kinds of movies, when they go back home, that apparently are very popular.)
But they are still forbidden from serving in what is known as "close combat". That is fighting with units - mainly in the infantry - whose key role is to seek out, engage with and kill enemy forces.
So I'll put these links up, remember, at the end of the show, on my website. And you can check them out for yourself. I think there was a caller. My satellite's just dropped again, but I think there's a caller from New York. I should really take that now, and it's trying to come up on my site. There's Mike from New York, are you there, Mike?
Mike: Hi, Alan.
Mike: Hi, how are you? Alan, what's your take on this, this Susan Boyle. B-o-y-l-e. She's from Scotland, and apparently won a talent show, a few weeks back in the UK, and ever since you can't look at any of the media, without hearing about her. She's been on Oprah, those inane morning shows, her mug is on every magazine cover, etc. Now, here's the interesting thing, this is not to be uncharitable, she's kind of homely. And that's putting it mildly. And according to those who know about music and singing, she is not that particularly talented. They say you can find a superior level of singing ability in most church choirs. So what's the agenda?
Alan: It's probably trying to get the public away from this definition of beauty equals talent, etc., I would imagine. Under some equality act, somewhere, they push some people forward. The same thing happened in Canada, about ten years ago, with a woman. Same type, looked exactly the same in fact, and nice voice, but not startling.
Mike: Yeah, because you have mentioned yourself in the past, that nobody gets this level of publicity without a nod and a wink. And you know, to sort of to assume as they implied, that these guys who are running the talent shows know nothing about the contestants beforehand, is complete gibberish.
Alan: Yes, it is. It is. These shows have been rigged. See, back in the 70s they had the same kind of thing in Britain, in fact, this Teen Idol is really a copycat of the Hughie Green show.
Mike: Correct, yeah.
Alan: And the Hughie Green show went on for years, and yet the guys they made #1 all the time, were pre-picked like Roger Whittaker, I met him and sung with him many times.
Mike: Also, Tom Jones was a winner. And also, I believe, Engelbert Humperdinck.
Alan: That's right. All these guys had their start there, and then it was disclosed, it was going for years, and then it was disclosed that Hughie Green was taking massive bribes from a source, to put certain people through, and everything was rigged in advance. Even Mary Hopkins went on there and started, because Paul McCartney wanted to back her, so he said make her the winner.
Mike: Okay, but yes, yes, I agree with that. But to get back with this woman. As I say, she's not particularly attractive to look at. You know, she's got a nice personality, but, you know, I'm just trying to figure out, you know what the agenda is on this.
Alan: It will be something to do with a feminist agenda, where they’re claiming discrimination on looks, etc, whatever the standard is.
Mike: Because, part of her shtick, when she first started out, was that apparently she had never been kissed.
Alan: And even the name. Generally they'll give you a new name that's more hip as they say, but they kept the same kind of, very dull, in fact there was a lot of jokes, long before you heard of her, of the Boyle. You know "boil" is a common joke.
Mike: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay Alan, I appreciate your input on that.
Alan: Yeah, thanks for calling.
Mike: Thanks, bye.
Alan: Yeah, they'll do that. They'll be under some feminist thing to stop discrimination on looks, etc, for talent or skill or whatever. Stars are made, that's the real world. Like everything else up there, stars are made. And like your outfits are made for you to rebel in, with your hat backwards, or your baggy pants, or whatever it happens to be, or your leather jeans and your crew cuts for your skin heads, these are all designed by the same people who give you your music, your movies, and your plays. The culture creator, creating industry I should say. And there's Steve from Indiana. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Alan, it's a pleasure. Yeah, you brought back memories when you were talking about your mail. About 30 years ago, I used to talk to Europe on a daily basis in the winter time because of the radio conditions. And I would ask the postmaster, why is it every single time I would receive a QSL card that would be confirmation of the contact, it would always be opened. He says: Oh, well, we're trying to make sure they're not sending something that they shouldn't. And what I would always do, I would send them like a cent or a nickel or something like that, and I would always receive like some change from people, like in Luxembourg, Belgium, and Liechtenstein. What I couldn't figure out is, why did they not confiscate the money?
Alan: Yes, that's not what they were after.
Steve: Yeah, I was a teenager, so I was uneducated and ignorant. I just didn't know, so I was going by what everybody else would tell me, and they were like, oh well, we're fighting the Commies, and we've got to make sure they're not doing something wrong. I figured you'd find that entertaining.
Alan: Yeah, it truly is amazing. As I say, Peter Wright, who worked with MI5 in his book called Spy Catcher, he tells you that the British post office was since its inception doing this, to keep track of all the data, that people were passing to each other, even before the cold war. It's data collection. It always has been. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. Just to finish off what the last caller was talking about, I think part of the purpose too, of this Susie Boyle phenomena, is they're telling you they can make anybody a star. That's the other message. Their industry can make anybody a star. They made Obama one, with a personality cult, PR guys, Hollywood staff, to give a whole persona, none of it would be real. And we believe it, most folk believe it. They think he is the family man, and perfect and so on; this is all PR and how you create a personality, a completely fictitious personality and sell it to the public. And any actor would do. But it's the same thing with the music industry. I've seen guys picked out to be stars. I've seen guys sign contracts with three hits in advance that they'd have written for them, guaranteed hits. And that would be the contract finished with. I've seen the artists who drew up the costumery they'd wear for their gimmickry, before they picked the artists out of line-ups, who would apply for them. That's how it really works. And sometimes they will use bands here and there who are so naive and young, they literally allow their managers to take over everything, and the record companies to take them over, and they end up with nothing at the end. Nothing at all, broke. That's the reality of the world. If they'll use you and abuse you, and throw you out to dry, it's as simple as that. Or make anybody a star. And I remember too, years ago, when the punk rock was really coming in, there were guys from Eton and Cambridge and so on, getting special lessons to talk the Cockney accent, and their dads had put up massive money to make them stars, and they did, they were all made into stars, as though they were East Enders. That's how they made them out to be, but these guys came from incredibly wealthy families, and the money was there to back them. They had the contacts, and they were made stars. The first group that really came out and did that was called Marmalade. And they had two or three hits in a row, one was Rainbow Valley. They wrote none of them themselves, it was all professionals who wrote it for them, none of them played any instrument on the records, but they mimed on stage with Top of the Pops, and it wasn't until they made the three hits that the father came out and says, yeah, I bought them into #1 status, and they told them the truth. None of them could sing. They had even brought other singers in to help make the music, and it was all recorded. It was all professional guitarists and so on and drummers they brought into the studios. And that's how fake the whole industry truly is. Simple as that.
Now we'll go to Rachel from North Carolina. Is Rachel there?
Rachel: Hi, I'm here. Hi Alan.
Alan: Yes, hello.
Rachel: Nice to talk to you again.
Alan: How are you doing?
Rachel: Good. I realized that all my topics are off topic. But I thought I was just call in, I noticed a long time ago I talked to you and I was very depressed, because it seemed like at first people just weren't getting it. And the more people I talked to, they just weren't getting it. And I was probably very manic about how I was telling them. And then I talked to you, and you said you've got to get together the documents, and really just lay it out to them over and over again. And I do notice now that a lot of the Christians and the Veterans are kind of getting it. And I guess I hear the music, but in fact I did get one pastor to show End Game that Alex Jones film at his Bible Study, so I thought that was pretty interesting, and he was also in the Gulf War, and he was talking about how they were forcing them to take drugs back then.
Alan: I've got amazing articles here I'll be reading tomorrow about that in fact. Thanks for calling, Rachel, and you're doing your bit for sure. And that's how it can be done. We can't compete with the billions, but we can certainly put many people out there to compete with the oratory.
From Hamish and myself, from Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
"Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation" by John Harlow, The Times - May 24, 2009.
"Camera grid to log number plates" by Richard Bilton (news.bbc.co.uk) - May 22, 2009.
"No jabs, no school says Labour MP" (news.bbc.co.uk) - May 11, 2009.
"Women's front-line role reviewed" (news.bbc.co.uk) - May 24, 2009.