May 5th, 2009 (#313)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt May 5th, 2009:
Tightening Reins on Patriot Games:
"Homeland Security with its Minions
Targeting People Who Have Opinions
Outside Box, Not Politically Correct,
Ticked-Off in Box Called 'Suspect,'
Most are Safe, Nothing to Fear,
Downloaded, Upgraded Year to Year,
An Update for Every Season,
Conclusions Reached Without Reason,
Appropriate Responses, as They Should,
Emotionally Embedded by Hollywood,
Elite Unworried, Masses Tame,
Give a Topic, Answers the Same,
There's Hardly a Trace, Minutely Residual,
Of a Sentient Reasoning Individual"
© Alan Watt May 5th, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - May 5th, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 5th of May 2009. For the newcomers look into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and download as many of the previous talks that I've given as you wish, where I try to show you how this planned agenda was formulated a long time ago. And it's the only way you can make sense of what's happening today. It's interesting to be an in-between generation, between that which is going out and those that are coming in. Because I've lived through the changes and watched it and studied it, and it's true enough what they say, that mammals look to their parents to show them what can hurt them in the great big world out there. And if the mammal parent doesn't know, then obviously the offspring won't know either. You'll think that the system in which you're born into is quite natural, kind of like the offspring of mice in a laboratory, in a cage. You'll think that's your natural habitat, and everything is quite natural, you're all crammed in there. It's very, very simple. And because we adapt to everything along the Darwinian course of things, we don't question, could there be any other way. But the big think tanks at the top that planned this way are already planning the next part of the way. That's how simple it is. So go into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, you can buy the books that are there. That keeps me going. You can also use paypal to donate or buy, if you write to me by email. And you can also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks that I give, which are written in the various languages of Europe, and for those who get the discs passed around, because people burn them every night and pass them all over the place, for people that don't have computers, you can simply write to me [listed above].
And we are on a roll. We are on an incredible roll, of change. This is the Century of Change. A change that took over a hundred years to plan, and over a hundred years to implement. And now we're on the next part as they actually implement the totalitarian planned society, worldwide. And everything is being standardized. Many of the groups that were formulated and set up to be agitation groups are now targeted because their usefulness is over. And that's now coming out in the press if you know how to read it; it's astonishing how many changes are happening. And whatever happens in the U.S. happens in Canada at this same time, as far as laws go, and in Britain as well. We're completely tied at the hip. Completely tied. Articles are now coming out to do with groups that are targeted by the Homeland Security of the U.S. on the same day that Britain publishes its own target list. As I say, that's no coincidence. And most people won't read through this huge PDF that was given to all members of Homeland Security. It goes all the way down to the police forces in your local area, remember. And you'll find somewhere if you have any view at all on anything at all to do with how things were, and the idea of having rights or property, then you're on that list, because that's what's coming out now. The old man has to go under the totalitarian regime, that is set up completely in control of governments across the world. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix. And just mentioning that everything is so wrapped up now, and regulated by a world system of governorship basically, that's what it really is. They call it governance, global governance. People don't even know that they've been teaching courses in some universities for years on this thing, as they happily go off to the voting poles to vote for what they think is a national government. And they've never looked into the treaties signed since the set up of the United Nations and the many treaties that are signed annually by the federal government and the U.N.. It's what they call creating closer ties. This is the terminology they use as they sign all these treaties. Closer ties, that's all you heard from the 70s through the 90s, as they were setting up the European Union and lying to the public. They kept saying that the prime minister was meeting the other prime ministers to forge closer ties. And what they were forging of course was a massive wake of paper trails and treaties that they were all signing, that they said would take years to unlock, therefore no one could ever do it. That's what they said. Legality, legalization.
It takes me back to the various movies that were out, Devil's Advocate being one of them, where Lucifer, the Lucifer character, a very good, funny movie too, he actually says that. He doesn't make people do anything, he'll give you choices, you know. He also says, how do you think we're taking over the world? He says, it's by lawyers. We churn out vast armies of them every year, more and more lawyers; because that's how you change the world through legality. That's how the Fabians said they would do it. They would infiltrate all governments, with their network, and from within they'd change it all. Meanwhile, anyone who advocates any other means, is now on their hit list for extermination, basically, because they will tolerate no, no rivalry of any kind. And how they got in was simple, because you see, they were so heavily funded by the international bankers in the first place, they couldn't fail. Very, very simple. No one could possibly rival that.
Here's the Washington Times, they're talking about the Homeland Security actually created an extremist dictionary for all their members to read, with classifications and definitions of groups down to individuals inside. And they're trying to say that they pulled it. Now they didn't pull it all. Don't ever kid yourself they pulled it, because it's the second time that this has cropped up, and it certainly is in use today. As the Fabians, who run everything worldwide, look at all their potential foes, and that means also those with old-fashioned ideas, as I say, about property and individual rights, etc. It says:
Homeland agency pulled back extremism dictionary
(A: Which of course they created.)
Black power, white supremacists, abortion foes make list.
The same Homeland Security Department office that categorized veterans as potential terrorists
(A: And I said that years ago, that's what they'd do, because after the Vietnam war they were scared of that time, that now they had people coming back who were trained in military affairs and weaponry etc, they were not too happy at the changes being wrought back home, as it was being Fabianized or Communized. So they made contingency plans to deal with this in future wars. That's why they all get sick now after a couple of years in the military, they're of no use to themselves, they're very, very sick, and they couldn't fight anyway. So they dealt with that issue, and that's ongoing today. So it says here:)
veterans as potential terrorists issued an earlier report that defined dozens of "extremists" ranging from black power activists to abortion foes.
(A: Now what is an abortion foe? It's anyone who has a contrary opinion to that which is now mandatory to have.)
The report was nixed within hours and recalled from state and local law enforcement officials.
(A: Well they've already got it electronically, and they already had a type out before that anyway. It says:)
Whites and blacks, Christians and Jews, Cubans and Mexicans, along with tax-hating Americans
(A: Do you understand the terminology they're using. Tax-hating. Is this like hate laws? Years ago, getting off this particular article for a second, years ago I said, that terms were coming in from the Soviet Union to be used here. We had the political correctness as a direct translation. Then there was also anti-government. This term started to be leaked out and used in the 90s. Anti-, anybody who had some complaint about, was suddenly anti-government. Because, you see that was one of the first laws that the Soviets put on the book, anyone objecting to the government was anti-government. Even if it was about a certain policy or something. That's now being used with a broad brush here, now as well. Getting back to the article:)
tax-hating Americans were among several political leanings listed in the "Domestic Extremism Lexicon" that came out of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) in late March.
The lexicon lists definitions for key terms and phrases used by Homeland Security analysts "that addresses the nature and scope of the threat that domestic, non-Islamic extremism poses to the United States," the report said.
(A: There's also a complete PDF and I'll put the link up on my website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you can read it right through at your leisure. Read through it, because you'll find as I say, they'll put the usual ones on top to put you off. Keep going down through it and you'll find you're on there somewhere. What amazed me too, reading the PDF was how many of the same tactics have been used, and are still used by the foundations, the big foundations that fund all the NGOs themselves to gain power. It's so typical of them. They'll complain about anyone else using the same techniques. It says:)
Black separatism was defined as a movement that they said advocates the establishment of a separate nation within the U.S., and its members "advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence directed toward local law enforcement" to advance their goals. Black power is a "term used by black separatists to describe their pride in, and the perceived superiority of the black race," the report said.
Under the listing "antiabortion extremism," the lexicon cites a movement that "advocates violence against providers of abortion-related services."
(A: Do you ever stop and stand back and just look at everything and shake your head? It's not a matter of actually taking a side on anything. It's using your rationality, to see what you're looking at. Do you know what an abortion entails? Think about it. Yet here's people who are "anti-abortion extremism," and it cites a movement that "advocates violence against providers of abortion related services." Invasive surgery of that nature is a violent act. Isn't it? People don't think about, they immediately jump on sides. They don't stand back and look.)
It notes that some people in the movement "cite various racist and anti-Semitic beliefs to justify their criminal activities."
"The lexicon was not an authorized I&A product, (A: Oh, no kidding.) and it was recalled as soon as management discovered it had been released without authorization," (A: That's them covering up, you know what.) said Amy Kudwa, Homeland Security spokeswoman.
(A: P.R. is what they have. Everything goes through P.R. who must cushion the truth.)
"This product is not, nor was it ever, in operational use," Ms. Kudwa said.
(A: Which is nonsense, because all of these terms that they have through this PDF is used on the Echelon programs, with the security services for Total Information Network retrieval. Anything that you use in these phrases on telephone calls, if it's written in emails it's all being immediately picked up by computers etc, and they know who you are, and what you said. It says:)
Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said the report "causes further concern that Congress needs to get to the bottom of exactly how DHS determines what intelligence products to distribute to law enforcement officials around the country."
(A: What they really mean is what they should tell the public that they're up to. That's really what it's about. But as I say, it's quite fascinating when you look through it. It's quite fascinating indeed. And there's so much of it there, you know. And it was unclassified, even though it said for official use only. Inside it's got:)
right wing extremism: a movement of right wing groups or individuals who can be broadly divided into those who are primarily hate-oriented, (A: Hate-oriented.) and those who are mainly anti government (A: You see, there's that term again.) and reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.
(A: You know, these guys would have wrapped up all the founding fathers and locked them up. Because remember, the United States for instance, was to be a federation, where anyone could pull out of it if they wished to, if the federal part broke its contract. It says here:)
secondary targeting: Plans or attacks directed against parties (secondary targets) that provide direct financial, logistic, or physical support to the primary target of an organized campaign, with the goal of coercing those parties to end their engagement with a primary target.
(A: It sounds like those that finance the politicians, doesn't it. Such hypocrisy written in here.)
Secondary targets can include customers of or suppliers to a primary target or employees of a primary target organization.
(A: Don't you just love lawyers, and how they word things. Can you imagine having a dinner with one of these characters?).
single-issue extremist groups: Groups or individuals who focus on a single issue or cause—such as animal rights, environmental
(A: Well who funds all the environmentalist groups, who set them up, the foundations did.)
or anti-abortion extremism—
I'll be back with more on this topic, after these messages.
I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. Reading this dictionary of all the various groups and individuals who are targeted by Homeland Security, this all-encompassing institution that brings together all people in all kinds of uniforms who get payment from the government. It even goes down to the postman apparently. That ties in with the speech we heard right after 9/11 where I think the President says everyone with a uniform, he says, get it on, get it on. And I said, what's this, what's this, what is this? Well, they already had the whole deal made up on paper, and all they had to do is put it into motion. Now we're seeing what the real agenda is.
And here's something to do with the Old Man that I talk about. The Old Man who thought he was born with rights, etc. This is sovereign citizen movement, he's down on the list as well. It says here:
A right wing extremist movement composed of groups or individuals who reject the notion of U.S. citizenship. They claim to follow only what they believe to be God’s law or common law and the original 10 amendments (Bill of Rights) to the U.S. Constitution. They believe they are emancipated from all other responsibilities associated with being a U.S. citizen, such as paying taxes, possessing a driver’s license and motor vehicle registration, or holding a social security number. They generally do not recognize federal or state government authority or laws. Several sovereign citizen groups in the United States produce fraudulent documents for their members in lieu of legitimate government-issued forms of identification. Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals. They often target government officials and law enforcement.
(A: Do you see the doublespeak in this? Who's really doing what to whom? Think about that. Who's doing what to whom? You see, over the years, the totalitarians as I say, infiltrated and took over the governments of the Western World. The Fabians. The difference being, according to them, is they did it legally, they did it within the existing institutions and governments and voting, and so on. And that's the only way they can do it. But that method again means that anyone with the money and the power, any system could be brought in. Whether it was fascism, Hitlerism, Sovietism, and what you've got is a blend of all of that, because you see, the same folks, Fabians, helped set up those two systems. And we've gone over the history of that before. Remember what the Club of Rome said, they favored the collectivist system, meaning the Soviet system. That's what you're seeing brought in. And that's why you're seeing all the same laws passed, that they passed in the Soviet Union, right from the start. Anti-government laws. It says here:)
tax resistance movement: Groups or individuals who vehemently believe taxes violate their constitutional rights.
(A: Well, actually, they do. See, they do.)
Among their beliefs are that wages are not income, that paying income taxes is voluntary, and that the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allowed Congress to levy taxes on income, was not properly ratified.
(A: Well, you see, even in the Rights of Man, and all the rest of it, and even in the Marxist manifesto, Karl Marx said, and these guys know this, the guys who wrote this article here, because, you see Karl Marx worked for them in his day. And he said that when you take taxes from a person, that's their livelihood. They worked for it. It was, he said it was actually stealing their wages, or it was in fact slavery. See, in slavery you can either put your time in voluntarily to pay off that which you owe, or they say you owe, or you can use the currency. That's how it's worked out. They simply take the currency off you. And it says here:)
Members have been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals.
(A: Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.)
They often target government entities such as the Internal Revenue Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
(A: Really? And they go through a whole bunch of groups. Even individuals who have these opinions are targeted here. If you don't come down with the politically correct opinions. Remember George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. You had to have a bland face in the street. You had to say all the politically correct answers in conversation, or you're immediately suspect. That's where we are now. And the Fabians that Orwell was talking about are completely in charge. Yesterday I went over this stuff by Newt Gingrich to do with his pal Al Gore and others, using their own terms when they talk about themselves, that we did this, and we did that. They're talking about the Fabian Society, the global society. Violent antiwar extremism, you're down there too.)
A movement of groups or individuals who advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts of violence and terrorism in an attempt to voice their opposition to U.S. involvement in war-related activities.
Violent religious sects
(A: Remember Margaret Thatcher and her speech at Massey Hall, back in the early 90s. The title of her speech was called the New World Order, and she talked about the coming war against religious fundamentalism. This is before Gulf War Part II. And this is what they're up to now. And they kicked it off when Clinton as in too, mind you. They kicked off the idea. They always give you a big show to kick off an idea, and that's why they targeted Waco, and burned it to the ground, and bowed to the flames at the end, as the American people chewed their gum, and said they probably deserved it. I'll be back with more after these messages.
I'm Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, going over this supposedly unauthorized, but authorized classification system that was published by Homeland Security and sent out to all different departments, to tell them who to be paranoid about, and who to investigate and who to lean on, etc. And the effect of it will be that people will clam up in the streets, because you better watch what you say now, and to whom you say it. You can't have your own opinion anymore. Authorized opinions only. You can talk about sports, you can talk about what's on the boob tube, you can talk about Hollywood, etc., but just don't talk about anything that matters. That could be termed dangerous, you're a thinker, and thinkers are definitely dangerous to this agenda and this system. They go through the:)
violent religious groups: Religious extremist groups predisposed toward violence. These groups often stockpile weapons, (A: Sounds like the government.) conduct paramilitary training, and share a paranoid interpretation of current world events, (A: It sounds like the think tanks that work for the governments, doesn't it. The ones I've read from) which they often associate with the end of the world. They perceive outsiders as enemies or evil influences; display intense xenophobia (A: Sounds exactly like governments and homeland security, because they’ve published lists and lists of Muslims and different ethnic races. Do you see what I said, the hypocrisy? That's called projection. Projection, you see, in psychiatry. They project what they are themselves onto others.) and strong distrust of the government; and exercise extreme physical or psychological control over group members, (A: We've already heard about waterboarding and so on, what these guys do to other people. This is government, eh.) sometimes isolating them from society (A: Well, Guantanamo Bay and other places across the world.) or subjecting them to physical (A: That's exactly what they've been doing all along under terrorism) or sexual abuse and harsh initiation practices.
We saw it all on TV. With the prisoners chained up like dogs, and the girl behind them laughing away. It also sounds like Bohemian Grove that all these characters at the top go to doesn't it? If you go down through all this massive list here, you'll find yourselves and those who believe in patriotism, rights, collecting gold and silver, all of that stuff is all on there. It's all on there, yep. So you know that any radio shows are targeted too, they're on the list already. In fact, I've gone over the law that was passed that allows Homeland Security to make lists of all the talk show hosts, record all their shows even from years past, to go back through it, to see if they said anything anti-government. And this is all done under the guise of protecting what? You see, it's protecting the guys that hijacked government long ago. That's what it's all about.
Here's from the U.K., May the 5th, BBC, now here it publishes on the same day.
UK 'least wanted' list published
(A: Guess what, it's all the same names that are on this one from Homeland Security.)
The names of some of the people barred from entering the UK for fostering extremism or hatred have been published for the first time. (A: Well, to the public, yeah.) Islamic extremists, (A: Is that xenophobia) white supremacists and a US radio host are among the 16 of 22 excluded in the five months to March to have been named by the Home Office. (A: The Home Office deals with the British Homeland Security. It used to be just police and officialdom, now it’s the whole kit and caboodle.)
Since 2005, the UK has been able to ban people who promote hatred, terrorist violence or serious criminal activity.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith (A: This is the woman who puts porn films down on her expenses and puts it in to the government.) said coming to the UK should be a privilege. (A: Well, everything in the UK is a privilege. It's a privilege you're born there. It's a privilege that you're put down as a taxpayer. Because, you see, in their democracy there are no rights, there's only privileges granted by the Crown.)
Ms Smith said "the public interest was against naming" the remaining six, for example on the grounds it could reveal the type of information being held about them. (A: Britain's awfully good at that too, about keeping secrets.)
The Muslim Council of Britain says the government should not act against people - whatever their views - unless they have broken the law.
However, Ms Smith said granting free speech did not provide a license to preach hatred and that those banned had "clearly overstepped the mark" with the attitudes they had expressed.
"[Naming them] enables people to see the sorts of unacceptable behaviour we are not willing to have in this country.
(A: Do you remember the term that started to come out in schools, you see they've already trained the generation who comes up into being patted down and frisked going through schools, having their lockers searched, and almost like being a prison really. They're training that way. And they've grown up now, they're in their 20s, some of them are 25 or so, and they brought out what they call Zero Tolerance. We heard that term. Zero Tolerance. It came from the top down, it started in schools. And then it spread out, and the cops wanted Zero Tolerance, where there'd be no drinking at all and driving, because they kept bringing down the limits. Cops bring in Zero, the cops are not supposed to bring in anything. The cops are supposed to do what they're told, by the government. Once they start making their own policies, you're in trouble. It says:)
"Coming to this country is a privilege. We won't allow people into this country who are going to propagate the sort of views... that fundamentally go against our values."
(A: Well, what values? I saw them change. I lived through the changes of the values, as these Fabians took over everything. You see the ones who change the system are paranoid that others might change the system from the system they've now created. That's why they're so paranoid. But the values have been turned absolutely upside down, in every social aspect.)
Ms Smith had announced in October the tightening of rules determining who could come to the UK.
(A: Remember, this also obviously means all those who are already there.)
A "presumption in favour of exclusion" was introduced that meant it would be up to the individual concerned to prove they would not "stir up tension" after arrival.
(A: How could that happen before you get there? How could you prove it?)
On the list of those banned between October and March are Hamas MP Yunis Al-Astal and Jewish extremist Mike Guzovsky.
Also excluded are two leaders of a violent Russian skinhead gang, ex-Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard Stephen 'Don' Black and neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe.
Fred Waldron Phelps Snr, a 79-year-old American Baptist pastor, and his daughter Shirley Phelps-Roper are barred for their anti-gay comments.
Both have picketed the funerals of Aids victims and celebrated the deaths of US soldiers as "punishment" for US tolerance of homosexuality.
Talk show host Michael Savage - real name Michael Weiner - is also excluded. His views on immigration, Islam, rape and autism have caused great offence in America.
(A: I don't know. When you look into the modern movies, how can you be offended if you sit and gorge these things, that gives you the culture. Because it's a culture creation industry. They don't reflect it back; they're always ahead of you, giving you what you'll adopt. It says if:)
"If people are keeping their odious views to themselves, that's their business. We should not be in the business of policing people's minds."
(A: Well, they already are. That's called political correctness. What do you think of this, what do you think of that.)
He added that internet broadcasts meant that speeches could be screened from abroad into UK meetings anyway.
They're terrified of all this stuff. Anyway, that's what's happening in the world. It's totalitarianism, and those who have taken over the governments and planned the world society, not the wonderful happy utopia, where we all live together, etc, but a planned, organized authoritarian society. They're petrified that the public will go against them, and any part of the public will go against them. And under the guise, do you know how they got to where they are? And got voted in time after time after time? By pretending they were the most liberal and tolerant of all. In fact, they used to be slogans. They used all these slogans, we'll have toleration for everything and everybody. And in reality they're the most intolerant of all. They pass laws. They don't allow you to have opinions. They pass laws. And enforce them. That was the Fabian strategy, by the big Astor family who were sent over to fund them, and helped fund the Royal Institute of International Affairs and all the other ones too, CFR etc on behalf of the global bankers.
They did a survey test type of thing recently too, to do with flu pandemics, and it was ongoing for years. They did one in 2006 as well, they now revealed, and guess who was in charge of it? The Bank of England. See the guys at the top are in charge of everything, because everything boils down to economics. Economics.
Here's an article here:
Pilots refuse to take part in national identity card trials
(A: This is from the Guardian. Monday the 4th of May.)
Airline pilots are to become the first group to refuse to take part in the national identity scheme when compulsory trials (A: Compulsory) start at Manchester and London City airports this autumn.
The British Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa ), which represents more than 80% of commercial airline pilots, is to mount a legal challenge to Home Office plans (A: That's the Homeland again.) to use "critical" airside workers as the first compulsory "guinea pigs" for the scheme.
MPs are shortly to be asked to approve the powers to compel the pilots and other airside workers at the two airports to register for the national ID card scheme as part of their "pre-employment" checks.
(A: Now listen to this, this is standard democracy.)
The £30 fee (A: That's about 60 bucks) is to be waived as an incentive for them to sign up. (A: To get them started, then it kicks in again, of course to re-register. I've always said that about this wonderful Fabian democracy. We pay for every chain that's made. We pay for every one. Everything is a fee. And they make so by law. Do you realize it's limitless what they can do with laws, when there's a fee attached to them? They can take away everything that you have, if you can't cough up. But we pay for every chain. Every link on that chain, we pay for.)
The pilots' union has protested to ministers that the £18m scheme cannot be regarded as voluntary when they are being told they will not qualify for an "airside pass" without them: "ID cards will have absolutely no value as far as security is concerned. (A: Well, they already know that.)
This is nothing other than coercion and promises that ID cards would be voluntary have been broken," (A: That's what they said, all this stuff was going to be voluntary.) Jim McAuslan, Balpa general secretary, has told ministers. "We will resist."
These behind the scenes preparations and the recent signing of two 10-year contracts worth £650m
(A: Do you realize the big money the top Fabians are making on everything that's happening, apart from looting the banks and causing the crash, etc, and then getting rewarded for doing it. It's astonishing, what they can put out with their laws and their target groups and all the rest of it. When there's nothing the public can do about the fact that the pirates keep looting the public. You see, justice is not part of their vocabulary in the Fabian system. It doesn't belong there. It's complete Darwinism and the right of those who have obviously proven they're the fittest to survive, to plunder and chain everyone else.)
10-year contracts worth £650m to get the ID cards programme under way undermine recent speculation that the cabinet is considering axing the scheme as part of the general Whitehall spending squeeze.
Etc, etc, etc. Do you realize the money, do you realize that everything at the top from the peasants’ point of view below, is totally corrupt. But it's quite normal for those at the top, because the under the table handshakes are all common. That's how government works at the top. It's all corrupt. And that's natural to them, normal. They all know the lobbyists, they're all buddies with them. That's the new democracy, Carroll Quigley said it. CEOs will be the new overlords, that's what you have, and that's normal business practice to plunder the peasantry. Amazing.
Even out of Ireland you find, to do with this flu thing. You see this flu idea is to terrify everyone into compliance, and taking mandatory inoculations, and it's also public/private deals with government and the pharma industries, just keep supplying all this useless stuff that won't do anything for a real flu, but it's a fantastic profit for useless stuff. Where else can you get a deal like that where government will buy it all from you, and mandate the public take it. But they also want to go ahead, you see, with so many different inoculations, you can't even name them all on this show. I've looked into what the doctors have all been getting put to them, to recommend that patients get, they want to give adults boosters all through their lives for everything, and come up with new inoculations for different things as well, until we're just pin cushions.
And I'm telling you, it's also very evident to many people, the damage that's been done to the immune systems of pretty well everyone with the inoculations that we've had already. It cannot be argued with, when you look at the statistics. The same with autism. Look where it's skyrocketed. What changed? The injections changed. That's what came in. Compare the two, side by side, and see for yourself. That's the real world that we live in, because we are animals according to those at the top, remember they're all Darwinian, and we have no rights whatsoever. The whole idea of Fabianism is that the experts, as Bertrand Russell said, should rule the people, the lessers down below. The experts should rule us all. And that's what we have. The experts rule us now. What can you say?
Getting back to my point at the beginning of the show. I mentioned that, if you're born into a system, and your parents don't know to warn you, or even say to you, you know this isn't the same system that it was ten, fifteen years ago, the child will think that everything that exists within that system is quite natural. That's why they think that you don't need privacy. They've been brought up being patted down, going into schools, having their lockers opened and checked and all the rest of it. They've been brought up with consensus in school. You don't get individualism anymore, you must all come to consensus on every topic. Groupthink, for the herd mentality, the new herd mentality for the planet. They're prepared, well prepared. Now we'll go to the callers and we've got John from California there. Are you there John? Oh, okay. We'll I'll go to break in a second, but as I say, that's how they prepare every generation. And Beria talked about this back in the 1930s, how they could do it, and upgrade you every two or three years. Back with more after these messages.
This is Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, just talking about how we're conditioned, year by year by year into the next part of the new reality. And most people don't even know how they come to the opinions that they presently hold. And they have no idea they'll hold different ones in about two or three years time. And even then, they won't know how it got into their heads. But they all agree about the same things, because they've all had the same perfect indoctrination, by the same media, ongoing. Even in Ireland, as I say, from the National Independent, the Government, there's also a Wise Up link I'll put up on my site, Cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show. It says here:
The Government is satisfied it has all the powers it needs to introduce controls, should they be required, such as compulsory vaccination
(A: Compulsory, you see, that's across the whole world now. Compulsory vaccination, that's what's come out of this whole bird thing, this bird flu, this whole hype.)
quarantine, travel bans and involuntary hospital admission.
They're going to force you to go in. It's the same international ones, because it all comes from the World Health Organization. Mandatory vaccination, compulsory vaccinations. That's what they wanted to come out of this hype. Terrify you all, so you'll be begging them to help you and, then they come in with all their different quackery to re-engineer you, and you won't want to know how they're re-engineering, they're already doing it. Now, we'll go to John from California if he's still there. Are you there John?
John: Good Evening, Alan, how are you?
Alan: Not so bad.
John: First, I want to thank you for providing me with a classical education; no institution has ever given me the perspective and insight that you've provided me and I truly appreciate it. You’ve empowered me in ways I never felt I would be. To note what you just were talking about, programming the masses, I grew up in Detroit, and I live in Southern California, close to the media machine, Hollywood. And since studying your topics in depth, I've found a pervasive Freemasonic movement within the media industry in Los Angeles, and I've come across a lot of the counter-intelligence that they utilize within their entertainment programming. And it's certainly been eye opening, even for instance, the influence of Scientology, within the city, and how they're utilizing that to penetrate the minds of the youth, who aspire to work in the industry. Very interesting stuff, but one of the things I want to note to you Alan. I went to Vancouver, British Columbia for my first time, and I was quite surprised to find the flag of the province, is aligned with the term the British Empire, where the sun never sets.
Alan: That's right. It's all Freemasonic, absolutely. It's also a particular way of saying the sun under cover, Vancouver. Some police forces have the same emblems too of this rising sun over the land or over the water, and the rays coming off.
John: It's my understanding now that the Freemasonic symbology is to be found all over Los Angeles, specifically perhaps Pasadena, which is a very old town within Southern California. But what really struck me, is most Canadians themselves really have no idea of the persona of their own country, and they don't think twice about why the Queen is on their money, and on every police precinct wall.
Alan: I know. And they have a Lieutenant Governor too, a General as well, who represents the Queen in parliament and in every province, as well. Thanks for calling in. People should look into the one on Scientology. There's a video on google where the Panorama guy tries to get information on them. You see the harassment he goes through, down in L.A. Well, from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
"Homeland agency pulled back extremism dictionary" by Audrey Hudson (washingtontimes.com) - May 5, 2009.
"Domestic Extremism Lexicon" [Homeland Security Dictionary of Targets] (at tdbimg.com) - March 26, 2009.
"UK 'least wanted' list published" (news.bbc.co.uk) - May 5, 2009.
"Pilots refuse to take part in national identity card trials" by Alan Travis (guardian.co.uk) - May 4, 2009.
"State insists it has powers to deal with crisis" by Dearbhail McDonald (independent.ie) - May 1, 2009.
"Independent: State has full powers for mass forced vaccinations and detentions" (wiseupjournal.com) - May 1, 2009.
Video: "Panorama: Scientology and Me" [Religion of the Culture Industry] (youtube.com).
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"