"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#260)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 19, 2009:
Mental Disorder of New World Order:
"More Bull from Mr.
Who Coined 'Gaia Theory' and Poppycock,
Future Visions Calamity, All Things Sordid,
For Creating Terror, was Well Rewarded,
From Stella Rimington, Queen of Spies,
Warns Politicos to Open Eyes,
Tyrannical Government is In Error
In Bringing Down a Reign of Terror,
World Economic Forum in Davos Met,
With Summit on Global Agenda, Plans They Set,
To Regulate Every Individual's Life
From Cradle to Grave, in World of Strife,
Look at Who Sponsors WEF's Foundation,
Same Names Who Wish to End all Nations"
© Alan Watt Feb. 19, 2009
Thursday February 19th 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 19, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
"Code of Silence" by
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 19th of February 2009.
Newcomers: look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many of the previous talks I've given as you wish. I try to give you shortcuts to understanding the big picture of those that control the world, the big pattern, and actually where it's going as well. These guys at the top, love to write dusty old books, at least they end up gathering dust in libraries; and they tell you where they're taking us and it's all done by subversion, subterfuge and, basically, bypassing all democratic institutions. In fact, they run the democratic institutions. We're not supposed to know where we're being taken, because we wouldn't like it you see; and that's why they don't tell the children the scary stuff. We, of course, are the children, according to those at the top; we're just too dumb and immature to understand what's in our own best interests, basically. That's what they tell you, if you talk to them face-to-face.
Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I've given in the past; you can print them up; and they're written in the various languages of Europe.
You can also buy what I have for sale on my site www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com that keeps me going and you can donate as well; as I say, I don't ask for payment for any of the work that I do from any of the shows that I'm on.
I was thinking today of a magazine that used to be out, it was called MAD Magazine, where they lampooned politicians and events of their time, in a sort of cartoonish way and it was very-very funny and, apparently, when they packed in / they stopped publishing their magazine, it was because life was becoming so ridiculous that it was very hard to lampoon it any more. And things have gotten that way, things are so incredibly politically correct that's it's double-think, double-speak time that we're living in and nothing makes much sense to us. The most crazy, ridiculous things are becoming law, passed into law for us all to follow, like global warming and things like this. We're to run our whole lives, apparently, on how much carbon we use up in our lifetime. It's a big stick, it's a big idea, as they call it, they give us ideas for every age; and a myth-making machine. They always give you a massive myth for the age to believe in. That was the whole policy that Leo Strauss ran the Neo-Conservatives on. He taught many of the members of that club - The Americans for the New American Century - the policy club that they had. He said we have to create a myth for the public to believe in; in other words: for what they call positive liberty - it's a form of Sovietisation or Nazism, where the whole country has to be involved as one, against something. Therefore, they gave you a war on terror, that was the myth; and in such a positive liberty scenario, you lose all your freedoms and rights, all for the “greater good”, as they say. The positive freedom and negative freedom philosophy came out of Isaiah Berlin, at Oxford University. He was a philosopher and this was his idea for running the century as well. You have all these philosophers at the top that are training these people, who then come into the workforce, they're given steps up to the top and they end up running our lives for us, with all these crazy ideas. However, they're not so crazy, when you boil it down, because tyranny is tyranny, regardless of the camouflage they put upon it.
Before I continue tonight, I'd like to mention about Chemtrails and a newspaper that'll publish them; and I'll give you the name of this paper, after I come back from this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. One British paper has started to put out photographs of the Chemtrails; you can send yours to them, if you have any, I'm sure, well, I know you will have them because I get hundreds sent to me alone, from all over the world. Something that no one wants to talk about, that shows you how little we truly know of the real world, we're never let it on what's truly happening to us; and they can't tell us about the Chemtrails, because, I'm sure, it's very detrimental just the physical fall-out itself on the public. This is the UK Column and you can get that at www.ukcolumn.org and they do, in the January edition, they have photographs of Chemtrails on the back page there. At least some people are trying to get it out into the public that which should be talked about.
That brings me onto, as I say, the farces we live under, these great myths that they create, to control us. We truly are treated with scorn, utter contempt and scorn at the bottom. We're just too uneducated, you see, to understand the big picture and we're too child-like to go along with it, even if we did understand it; we're just children, therefore we're run by deception, as I say. A very old plan, a very old agenda; and it's not so complex, even though there's hundreds and hundreds of Non-Governmental Organisations running our lives. It's not so complex, because you have a handful of bankers, with their Foundations funding it all; and the NGOs simply are lobby groups. They also use Think-Tanks as well, funded by the same Foundations, to advise governments on various policies, which, of course, these Foundations dream up themselves. And it's really just the eugenics policies, under disguise, that's always been their mantra: depopulate the world, there are too many 'useless eaters'; let's save the good types, those who have proven that they have a right to continue, by the acquisition of wealth and their selective marriages, where they marry. Really, power marries power and that, in itself, shows you that they have the 'right stuff' to go on. They've gained lots of money and wealth over the centuries, they haven't lost it, and because of their specific breeding, they can pass these genes on to their own generations, that's what they truly believe.
In the meantime too, as I say, they're killing off the rest of the public; I say that without a problem, I believe it absolutely, because I watch and I study the medical data going back for fifty and a hundred years. And to see the rise in cancers, for instance, all the kinds of cancers that have happened, especially in the last fifty years, is just astonishing. This should be a crisis but it's not a crisis; why is not? It's because it's the agenda. The sperm count too has been falling for fifty years; why is that not a crisis? Because it's the agenda; it's very simple, when you understand the agenda.
Here's the farce, as I say, that's supposed to control our lives: the threat of annihilation, through global warming and excess carbon in the atmosphere.
Now, here's an article here from the New Scientist 23rd of January 2009 and it's from one of their clones, I call these people ‘clones’ because they're interchangeable with their mantras about the global warming. They've really fed themselves very-very well and lucratively by pushing these mantras on society and they're interchangeable because they all give the same spiel, the same spiel on any topic, they're all identical with what they see and what they say, regardless of where they're born or what country they're in.
This is from James Lovelock, this is the guy who dreamed up the Gaia Theory, at least he's given the credit for it; and he's made his living on this whole thing - and no doubt - he's being pushed by the big Foundations, the same old boys, you know who they are. It says here:
With his 90th birthday in July,
I bet he's not eating GMO food.
a trip into space scheduled for later in the year and a new book out next month,
Probably ghost written.
2009 promises to be an exciting time for James Lovelock. But the originator of the Gaia theory, which describes Earth as a self-regulating planet, has a stark view of the future of humanity. He tells Gaia Vince
Who's Gaia Vince? Gaia Vince eh?!
we have one last chance to save ourselves - and it has nothing to do with nuclear power.
It says here:
Your work on atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons led eventually to a global CFC ban that saved us from ozone-layer depletion.
Now, that was utter nonsense to start with. DuPont got the contract with the new stuff they use in refrigerators, because the old stuff you see was heavy, heavier than air. It stayed at the earth, it didn't go up into the Ozone Layer; but that was the con that they pulled at the time; and this guy was well-rewarded for pushing this nonsense. It says:
Do we have time to do a similar thing with carbon emissions to save ourselves from climate change?
This is what this guy says, who's a true believer, remember, he's a eugenicist, he believes in the survival of the fittest and the elites; and the killing off of the lessers, as you'll see later, in this article. He says:
Not a hope in hell.
This is his answer.
Most of the "green" stuff is verging on a gigantic scam.
He's admitting that, that the whole greening thing is a scam.
Carbon trading, with its huge government subsidies, is just what finance and industry wanted. It's not going to do a damn thing about climate change, but it'll make a lot of money for a lot of people and postpone the moment of reckoning. I am not against renewable energy, but to spoil all the decent countryside in the UK with wind farms is driving me mad. It's absolutely unnecessary, and it takes 2500 square kilometres to produce a gigawatt - that's an awful lot of countryside.
Then he's asked:
What about work to sequester carbon dioxide?
That is a waste of time. It's a crazy idea - and dangerous. It would take so long and use so much energy that it will not be done.
He's asked for his ideas on nuclear power and would that solve the problem? He says:
It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures.
Then he's asked if we're doomed? He says:
There is one way we could save ourselves and that is through the massive burial of charcoal.
This is his latest fad; they go through fads these guys. He says:
It would mean farmers turning all their agricultural waste - which contains carbon that the plants have spent the summer sequestering - into non-biodegradable charcoal, and burying it in the soil. Then you can start shifting really hefty quantities of carbon out of the system and pull the CO2 down quite fast.
Then he says "Would it make enough of difference? He says:
Yes. The biosphere
Now, listen to this: this is their estimates (the biosphere itself, being all the plants and nature and so on, excluding humans):
The biosphere pumps out 550 gigatonnes of carbon yearly;
That's without our help. He says we, the humans:
put in only 30 gigatonnes. Ninety-nine per cent of the carbon that is fixed by plants is released back into the atmosphere within a year or so by consumers like bacteria, nematodes and worms. What we can do is cheat those consumers by getting farmers to burn their crop waste at very low oxygen levels to turn it into charcoal, which the farmer then ploughs into the field.
This is his latest scheme for it. These schemes, mind you, means that they're well-rewarded and the crazier they are the better; it seems to be that way, it's like lies, people like the big lies. They'll swallow that but they won't fall for the small lies. It's the same with these schemes they dream up. He says "Do you think we'll survive? He says:
I'm an optimistic pessimist. I think it's wrong to assume we'll survive 2°C of warming:
Now here it comes you see:
there are already too many people on Earth.
You see, here's the old eugenics thing again.
At 4°C we could not survive with even one-tenth of our current population. The reason is we would not find enough food,
You've been wondering what all this hype about food is as they start tightening the reins on the food? It's all tying in together you see. He says
unless we synthesised it. Because of this, the cull
the cull during this century is going to be huge, up to 90 per cent.
Well, he's right on target with Jacques Cousteau and all the other big boys. 90%, that's what they want, so that they can survive, supposedly, you know, the elites like themselves. He says:
The number of people remaining at the end of the century will probably be a billion or less. It has happened before: between the ice ages there were bottlenecks when there were only
I love how they dream up these figures; they're talking about, you know, thousands and billions of years ago.
2000 people left.
How would he know? Then he says:
It's happening again. I don't think humans react fast enough or are clever enough to handle what's coming up. Kyoto was 11 years ago. Virtually nothing's been done except endless talk and meetings. I don't think we can react fast enough or are clever enough to handle what's coming up.
There you go, this is your standard character who's spent his life making a career for himself, by putting out all this nonsense that's politically correct, because it goes along with the agenda of the Club of Rome and all the other organisations that plan to use the scam of blaming mankind for global warming. Even though it's a lot of BS to begin with; but that won't change it, facts won't change what's happening, at all.
Now, everyone knows that the World Economic Forum was on in January and the papers made sure we knew that much, that every prime minister and president attended it; and, of course, we the average person, thinks, and they all told us too, out of this is coming a new economic system, a new economic system and, once again, we yawn because we're not told very much and we think 'well that's it, it's to do with money' and we know it's the redistribution of wealth and so on. What was it really-really about? Because if you go in to what happened at the World Economic Forum and what they also called it, amongst themselves, ‘Summit on the Global Agenda’. The Summit on the Global Agenda, Global agenda you see. Look up ‘agenda’ in the dictionary. Back with more; after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I've talked on about these big Foundations with their thousands of NGOs, meeting across the world, over many-many years, planning our future, according to a pre-written agenda, in fact; and finding ways to implement all the different parts of the agenda into society, through media, entertainment etc, etc. Whenever you hear of these big meetings across the world, look into them, because you'll often find there's more to it than meets the eye, an awful lot more to it, because, as I say, at the World Economic Forum, much more was discussed than basic economics. Very-very misleading, of course, because that's the way they operate, they do it under cover, everything's done under cover, because the public's not supposed to know where we're going, or why we're going there in fact, or who attends even. And they always have them in these places for the United Nations, like Davos, Switzerland, like this one was held, that most people can't just jet off to and get a ticket to get in. But all the NGO leaders can get there and wine and dine and live on the best food and so on; and I don't think they were kidding about their carbon output during that time or cutting back on the supplies of food they were all consuming or the types either. You go into their agenda and they actually called it, at the World Economic Forum, Summit on the Global Agenda and you can look up Summit on the Global Agenda reports, to see what they were going into; because it's every facet, every facet of life, for every gender, for every age group, from birth to death, including employment and everything else. Here's what it started with:
· Economic Development and Growth
That sounds all right.
· Environment and Sustainability
That's coupled together now, with economic development and growth. You can't have both coexisting properly, unless you bring down the population, obviously, the big mantra of reducing the population.
· Finance and Business
· Geopolitics and Global Governance
They call it 'Regions' across the world, under the United Nations.
· Society and Values
They talking about cultures here: your culture; and it's not talking just about them, it's how to create new values for the culture, for creating a new culture; they have special departments that do that, that work with all entertainment industries and media.
· Technology and Innovation
· Global Issue Profiles
· Alternative Energies
· Benchmarking Progress in Society
· Challenges of Gerontology
That's the elderly, too many of them, they claim.
· Challenges of Nanotechnology.
They're so excited about Nanotechnology and what it's going to do.
· Chronic Diseases and Malnutrition
· Climate Change
This is at the World Economic Forum.
· Corporate Governance
"Corporate' Governance", what does "Corporate Governance" mean? Look it up.
· Demographic Shifts
· Economic Growth and Development
· Economic Imbalances
That's redistribution of wealth; and for all those in the Western world who are losing their homes, because they can’t pay the rent or the mortgage, you're supposedly the wealthy, they must distribute your wealth to the Third World countries.
· Ecosystems and Biodiversity Loss
· Emerging Multinationals
· Empowering Youth
‘Empowering youth’ means really the creation of mass organisations that will be used politically to, again, enforce certain laws and rules and regulations that will come down the pike, down the future.
· Energy Security
Religions too, your religions is all part of this discussion at the World Economic Forum.
· Financial Empowerment
· Financial Market Development
· Food Security
· Fragile States
· Future of Africa
· Future of Australia
Very interesting: the future of Australia, you should read this, all you Aussies down there.
· Future of China
· Future of Entertainment
This is all at the World Economic Forum. Each one is a big area in itself. ‘The Future of Entertainment’ is going further and using entertainment, basically, to be used as propaganda tools, to give you certain opinions. That's what it's to be used for. You should go into this, have a really good read at it, because it's fascinating to see what was really discussed at the World Economic Forum, or, as they like to call it themselves, "The Summit on the Global Agenda". For those who still think that they have nations, the global agenda. And thank you again for the media, for keeping all the truth of it really-really out of the papers, as Mr. Rockefeller has said before, on previous occasions.
Here's an article here too and it's from The Guardian, Thursday 19th of February. It says:
Rimington is right. This is a recipe for creating terrorists - by Seumas Milne
This journalist says:
I never imagined I would say this, but Stella Rimington is right. The former head of MI5 who made her career running the security service's dirtiest operations in the 1980s, against the miners' union and the IRA,
And that's true: they set up a whole bunch of dirty tricks to destroy the Miners' unions. Maggie Thatcher, in fact, imported Polish coal, so that she could put the miners out of business in Britain and she was very successful. Poland, by the way, was part of the communist conglomerate, at that time, but she had no problem trading with them. Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from The Guardian, where the former head of MI5 has a lot to say on what's happening in Britain and the world today. And she says here:
…that the government has given terrorists the chance to find "greater justification" by making people feel they "live in fear and under a police state". Naturally, ministers described her remarks as nonsense and accused her of playing "into the hands of our enemies". But the damage is done. To have the woman once hailed as Britain's Queen of Spies accusing the government of recklessly counter-productive authoritarianism carries a special weight - and incidentally turns the traditional relationship between Labour and the secret state
I like that "secret state" part.
on its head. Rimington went further, denouncing the US for Guantánamo and torture, but reverted to type by insisting MI5 "doesn't do that".
No, as we now know, it contracts out that job to others, while its officers stand by promising to arrange "more lenient treatment" if the victim co-operates.
In case after case, British collaboration, in the hidden crimes of the war on terror has now been laid bare. But none more so than in the seven-year ordeal of Binyam Mohamed, the last British resident in Guantánamo, the details of whose CIA kidnapping and US-orchestrated torture across four countries the foreign secretary, David Miliband, has twisted and turned to prevent being made public.
Britain's very good at that, they keep behind other countries.
As it now turns out, the US letter warning that intelligence-sharing with Britain would be damaged if the torture evidence was published
They're terrified to publish it.
- used to strong-arm the high court into suppressing it - was in fact issued at the request of the Foreign Office itself. Perhaps that's hardly surprising, when the court has already heard that MI5 officers questioned the freshly tortured Mohamed in illegal Pakistani detention under government guidelines and fed questions to CIA interrogators as he was secretly "rendered" from Pakistan to Afghanistan to Morocco.
This is what they did to these guys:
Mohamed was hung from leather straps and beaten in Pakistan,
Now, we'd better get that through our thick skulls you know, this is what's coming down the pike across the western world, to the people within those countries, that you means you and I, everyone, that's what this means. We always think it's 'over there' somewhere, it’s some other sap that's getting it, he doesn't look like me, so I'm ok. Don't you ever kid yourself. This says:
Mohamed was hung from leather straps and beaten in Pakistan, and had his genitals slashed in Morocco, while other British terror suspects questioned by MI5 had their fingernails ripped out.
They ripped out their fingernails.
Mohamed ended up confessing under torture to a fantasy "dirty bomb" plot, though all charges have been dropped and he is finally due to be returned to Britain any day now.
This is what they've been doing to these guys across the world, as we sit by and watch junk on television and fantasy and trivia and sports. It says:
But New Labour's sins in the war on terror are catching up with it. And it's not only officials, but politicians, up to and including Tony Blair, who could be in the legal frame as a result of British collusion with torture, "extraordinary rendition" - illegal abductions to third countries - and "ghost" prisons.
By the way, this turns in with extradition that's been made legal now. Countries are now extraditing people from all other countries, across the world, for other kinds of new crimes, like speech crimes and things like that. That's happening right now. It says:
No doubt a battery of state powers and immunities will be deployed to head off such humiliation. But as this week's chilling International Commission of Jurists' report on the counter-terrorist free-for-all put it: "The framework of international law is being undermined ... the US and UK have led that undermining."
Now, this also comes under, what I mentioned earlier, and that's this concept by Isaiah Berlin, of Oxford University, he's dead now, who came up with positive freedom. Positive freedom is a technique where the people are goaded into action, becoming all as one towards some great threat, but it really is a guise, as he knew himself and stated so, for authoritarianism and totalitarianism by tyranny, to control the people; and that's what this terrorism BS is all about, because politicians were terrified that they were going to lose it over the public. The public were so disgusted at the corruption within politics, over the last 20-30 years, they knew they were losing it; they were losing control over the people and they were terrified of that, so they invented terrorism, simple as that. That was the new myth for the age, as Leo Strauss designed it.
Now, I'll go to callers now and I've got Rick from California there, are you there Rick?
Rick: Yes, am I getting through, Alan?
Alan: You are.
Rick: Oh, hi, how are you doing?
Alan: Not so bad.
Rick: Yeah, I was coming out of the grocery store today and I was approached by this pretty Asian woman who was very young, who was very active, she was very young and idealistic and said she was from the League of California Conservation Voters; and then we got to talking and then she started going into this diatribe about this Republican who voted against all these environmental clean air, clean bill, clean energy things and she said "Do you want to go for the 100% guy or do you want to go for the 6% guy?" And I said to her: "Well, suppose I'm a legislator, put me in the place of a legislator for a minute and across my desk comes this Bill, you know, with conservation measures that sound really good and clean; but, then attached to it is some kind of clause that denies elderly people their health care. Do you think I'm going to vote for that?" Of course not and I said: "That's how it works in Washington. And she said: "I know; politics is very dirty." I was thinking about that Bill you were reading last night about how they're going to deny elderly people their care.
Alan: Yes, there's no doubt about it. Again, under the United Nations definition of a "good world citizen" - that's the term that Obama kept using during his campaign - for all the thick skulls out there that never caught it, never heard him, or ignored it, he kept on about World Citizenship. Well, a good world citizen, according to the UN, is a good producer and consumer; when you stop producing and you retire, you're now a consumer only, you're a bad citizen; and what do they do with bad citizens? Well, they'd rather you were dead.
Rick: You know that's terrible.
Alan: That's what it is, this is the value of life because it's all coming down to your value to society, that was always it - in a world state, where you serve the world state - it all depends on your value to the society and if they declare that you have no more value to them, then you're a useless eater and they must dispose of you. That's coming in folks and I kid you not.
Rick: I also told her about how a lot of the global warming is also fuelling this push for nuclear energy and I said to her, I don't know if you know about this, but Africa is being ravaged right now by the extraction of nuclear uranium that's poisoning the people all across in Malawi and Mali and all these different places. And so, I have a question I wanted to ask you Alan: some Christian websites maintain that Aleister Crowley believed in reducing / killing off what he called the inferior races, in favour of a superman, did Aleister Crowley believe this or did he say this?
Alan: I haven't, myself, come across him saying that, in any of the books, but I wouldn't be surprised; he belonged to the right class in that society and he did believe in superior and inferior types but I don't know if he ever advocated killing them off.
Rick: OK. It was when they said, it was in the context of his visitation by the spirit in Egypt in 1904 that he claims to have had. Alright, well thank you very much Alan for answering my question.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Crowley was quite an amazing character; and, once again, we find out, years later that he worked for MI5 and MI6 during World War II and was sent out to set up the O.T.O. (Ordo Templi Orientis) and get a whole bunch of youth all ready for the 1960s, basically, because all the big pop stars, at the time, joined the O.T.O.
Now we'll go to, we've got Leo in Massachusetts, are you there Leo?
Leo: Hi, thank you for taking my call. I heard you today earlier on Alex and I realised that I needed to call you because I've been hearing all these quotations, Alex talks about quotations of the NWO, as he gets them from their own documents. Is there a URL anywhere, or do you have one on your site somewhere, something to the title of 'in their own words, the NWO exposed', so that all of their quotes are together, with links to show where the quotes are.
Alan: Well, I'll tell you I've been reading a book, last week there, it's called Hope of the Wicked and it's by Ted Flynn; and the guy - literally - has done a great work, by putting all of these quotes and who said it and what organisations, foundations, NGOs etc that they belong to and it's primarily the Council on Foreign Relations in the US and the British version of the same organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in Britain. You'll find that pretty-well all of the organisations across the world belong to these two groups today, and all the NGOs come under them as well. That's where you'll find all of these main quotes and these are definite quotes, from their own writings.
Leo: Hope for the Wicked is the book?
Alan: Yes, it's called Hope for the Wicked: the master plan to rule the world, by Ted Flynn.
Leo: Yeah, well in my miscellaneous meanderings on the internet yesterday, I came upon this rather interesting concept; and I'm wondering why it's not getting more play and what it basically is, this is: within the black rap world, there have been some interesting murders going down. Evidently there was a group of Masonic Blacks called Boule, have you checked into that at all?
Alan: No, but I do know there are Masonic affiliations within all the music industry and the Black one too.
Leo: I think it's a really good point to bring out and research because you wonder why people are so quiet and I think this is one of the little key factors of controlled opposition.
Alan: Well, I actually had a pile of stuff sent to me, by someone whose brother is an instructor at the FBI Academy and it was to with gangs across the United States; and it was about all their logos and what was surprising was that so many of them were Occultic / Freemasonic logos these young guys could not have dreamed up themselves. There was that odd connection there too; but you also find if you look at most of the album covers, going back from the 1960's onwards, right up to the present time, you'll see them flashing the signs, the Masonic signs on their covers, standing on the square and so on. You'll see it through them all; it's just all over the place.
Leo: Well, I think that these issues need a broader spectrum analysis, because I think as long as there are little quiet things on YouTube that nobody looks at, then, in fact if you just put in the search box Boule and you'll find stuff. There's one person, I think it's Steve Croft, he really went into it and there's a lot of good Black people out there fighting the fight but it would be nice for us to.
Alan: As I say, it's a huge subject and it's every area of the arts as well; and it's all through Hollywood as well, actors and so on. You've got to understand that Freemasonry is the religion of the world, it's across the entire planet; and even when the churches go down, no one thinks about these little temples standing in their local village. They're everywhere and they have been used right down to the present times, to further this agenda. It's the same with the Bohemian Grove, all the big, I don't call them captains of industry, these guys are actually the pirates of industry and they're all Freemasons, to get into that club, to begin with. You can't go into it unless you're a Freemason.
Leo: And I was in a Masonic Hall for a friend's recital and I looked up on the wall and they cited all the different charities that they support; among them was the Salvation Army, how interesting!
Alan: Well they do now, because the Salvation Army caved in a few years ago and they took their tax break status, and along with it came the rules of things they could not preach anymore, to their followers; and they went along with that, so now they're ok, as far as Freemasonry's concerned.
Leo: Well, what did they have to drop?
Alan: Any references to alternative lifestyles, put it that way.
Leo: Do you mean like putting down the alternative homosexual lifestyle?
Alan: Even mentioning it, that's out; they can't do that anymore, it's a whole bunch. Whenever you take that tax break, that 501c3 or something, whatever they call it, you get a list from the government of things you cannot mention anymore to your congregations.
Leo: The benefit comes with the really incredible caveat and that's what I think is the problem, nowadays, the black ministry has been, basically, silenced, cockled, whatever adjective you choose to use, into this abhorrent silence. Even before Obama, now they're probably going to be silenced because of Obama.
Alan: Yes, I know, every trick that can be played will be played now, as we go through the biggest changes the world has ever seen. They're telling us the truth when they tell us they're bringing a completely new world system and a new way of living; and that means everything that you do in life is going to be turned upside down. Thanks for calling; I have to go onto the next caller.
Leo: OK, thank you.
Alan: And there's also Phil, from Florida, here. Are you there Phil? Hello? I can't hear you.
[Caller has bad connection.]
Alan: OK, well, I was going to read something else here anyway, because I was sent this article from 2007, which gives you an idea that the whole idea coming into this great depression we're into, was already known a few years ago; and the big boys were making arrangements to sell off their top shares, quietly, before they spooked the public. This is from the Telegraph, the 25th of June 2007, by Ambrose Evans- Pritchard and it says here:
BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree.
That's the Bank for International Settlements at the top, basically, the United Nations. It says here:
The Bank for International Settlements, the world's most prestigious financial body, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood.
I'll read a bit more of this afterwards; it's interesting what they say. Back, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from The Telegraph and this was back in 2007, 25th of June, where they go through the fact that there was a Depression coming up and you should read through this article, I'll leave the link at the end of the show. This ties in with the WiseUp Journal that also did an even deeper exposé into this particular article from that newspaper and this, I'll put this link up as well. He says here:
Irish Stock Market Crash & Global Depression
Did you know the Irish stock market (ISEQ) has crashed and lost over 40 billion Euro in one year?
This is back, again in 2007, the 30th of December 2007. It says:
If you're not one of the few stock investors in Ireland then your answer will probably be no. Not surprising since you’re not really being told.
Then he does a very-very good exposé, into the fact it wasn't just Ireland, it was world-wide at the time. What they did: they gave time for all the biggest investors to get their money out and sell off their shares; and, in this article here, they tell you how it was done. You see, there are no surprises at the top: they know what's coming; they always save their boys at the top. It's the ones down below who lose their shirts, never the boys at the top, never ever the boys at the top. Also, I'm going to put a link up from the Telegraph, it was one of the photographs of the year, it got an award and what it is, it's:
A picture of an armed sheriff moving through an American home after an eviction due to a mortgage foreclosure won the top prize in the World Press Photo competition.
It's like a guy going through a building in the Middle East, caught with his gun ready to shoot the owner, I guess; and there's boxes all over the floor, I guess they were trying to get their stuff out of the way before the eviction. This is how they're treating people now if they can't pay their mortgages; and this photograph gets an award and here's this goon, this shaven-headed goon, ready to shoot the owner, if he doesn't get out. It's disgusting, disgusting what we're seeing today, what's happening, incredible. Also, I'm putting a link up to show you how they're going to turn us all back into serfs; and this is a BBC news item that came out on the 19th February 2009:
Land freed for 1,000 allotments
They're going to give people little allotments, to get them growing their own food again. This also comes under Communitarianism, if you wondered what that phrase really meant, Communitarianism. You see, there's going to be a massive food shortage, they’re going to make it happen; but they'll have all these little people growing in their little plots, like the serfs did in the Middle Ages, and the nobles will come along, no doubt, and take a good share of what you grow. That's how they did it in the past time, I think they took 60% of what you produced, in the Medieval Times, the lords did that and left you with 40%, to feed your family and any help that you had around the farm.
Here, they're going to give you, they're getting you back to your little plot on the land, to feed yourself. People have no idea what's planned, no idea whatsoever what's coming down the pike; and I really mean it when I say there's a brand new way of living and your duty will be to serve the World State. They mean that when they say that. The first person who put it out there was Cecil Rhodes; he wanted a British-style system across the entire planet. Although he said that the US, or another country, could take up the standard and carry on when Britain couldn't afford it. Well, the US did take it over and now they've been the policeman of the world for a long time, they must go under, and China will arrive as the policeman of the world. In the meantime, we’ll all become peasants again.
Well, that's it for tonight; I hear the music coming in. So, from Hamish and myself, Ontario Canada, it's goodnight - and may your God, or your gods - go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Photos to UK Column] ukcolumn.org.
"One last chance to save mankind" [James Lovelock interviewed] by Gaia Vince (newscientist.com) - Jan. 23, 2009.
"World Economic Forum: Summit on the Global Agenda" [PDF file] (weforum.org).
"Rimington is right. This is a recipe for creating terrorists" by Seumas Milne (guardian.co.uk) - Feb. 19, 2009.
"BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree" by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard (telegraph.co.uk) - Jun. 25, 2007.
"Irish Stock Market Crash & Global Depression" (wiseupjournal.com) - Dec. 30, 2007.
"2008 World Press Photo of the Year contest" [Armed sheriff raid for mortgage foreclosure eviction] (telegraph.co.uk).
"Land freed for 1,000 allotments" (news.bbc.co.uk) - Feb. 19, 2009.