"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#259)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 18, 2009:
Hell Reeks of Control Freaks:
Children, No Pussyfooting Around,
Says Fabian Blair, Now Fabian Brown,
We Shall Alter the Fetus in the Womb,
Creating Obedience, Womb to Tomb,
Overriding Objections 'Cause People Won't Let Us,
We'll Rid the World of Children Who Menace,
Bring Young Girls to Us, They Can Play with Men,
We're Giving Girls Implants as Young as Age Ten,
They Can Play Around with Scattered Attention,
And No Consequence with This Contraception,
Rockefeller and Gates, Philanthropic and Good,
Pay for Testing on Children the New GM Food,
While Their Main Thrust is Constant, Depopulation,
To be Fed While We Die, is Some Consolation"
© Alan Watt Feb. 18, 2009
Wednesday February 18th 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 18, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. It's the 18th of February 2009.
Newcomers: look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on the website, you'll find lots of talks I've given, in the past, where I try to give you shortcuts to the big picture of the system that runs the world; and to show you that nothing happens by chance, it all connects together and it's pushing in a particular direction, a direction where the big boys who helped design it - at least the last couple of hundred years - have published books on this direction. And I read from their books when I can, rather than guessing and going into conspiracy books. It's quite plain where we're all supposed to head into: this eugenics system.
Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download and print up, and they're written in the various languages of Europe.
Last night, I mentioned the British Home Office. The Home Office is really the big British organisation that deals with all laws in Britain, mainly for police, they're the ones who check out passports and issue them and so on. Yet, here they are into, not just doing DNA sampling of people, they're going in much-much deeper into research, to alter DNA, in animals; and, ultimately, they hope to understand humans better - but they're also even doing experiments to inject viruses that carry foreign DNA into tissue. What on earth has that got to do with security? And it isn't until you go into the old eugenics plans that it all fits together. Because, you see, they want a society which is predictable; they want a society where they can recreate humanity, from scratch; they want a society where they can eliminate all genes that might make you, what they would term, a 'troublemaker', someone that might think and ask questions, or simply you won't go along with some new law that comes out that's ridiculous. That's the society, the system they're bringing in; and those in the Fabian Society, for instance, wrote about it, a long time ago.
It's interesting that Tony Blair was a member of the Fabian Society, a true died in the wool believer in the whole agenda that people, really, are completely malleable, you can train them like animals, to behave in a certain way. This is exactly the same as they tried in the Soviet Union, they believed that they could, literally, create a generation of people that were kind of made-to-order, planned that way, through special techniques and then science eventually would overcome just the psychological techniques and they could create a new type of human.
I've got an article here that goes back to when Blair was in office, from the BBC News and this is the 31st of August 2006, and the BBC talked about Blair going to tackle the menace children, he called it 'menace children'.
Blair to tackle 'menace' children
Tomorrow's potential troublemakers can be identified even before they are born, Tony Blair has suggested.
Now you see how it ties in with all of this DNA experimentation with the Home Office, the guys that are supposed to just issue passports and do security checkups and so on, are now one of the biggest scientific organisations in the DNA sector you can imagine. It says here, actually, I'll read more of this when I get back, because it’s a very-very important article and like most, they get brushed over and then forgotten, but it ties right into where we're going tonight.
Back in a moment - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I've been talking, over the last few months, about the Eugenics system in which we live and what their ultimate goals are, step-by-step; and how big players wrote about the necessity to destroy the family, like Julian Huxley, that's what one of his big pushes was towards, same with his brother Aldous Huxley; and we find the same in the writings of Bertrand Russell and others. Because, once that was out the way, they would be free to really do what they wanted with the children and that's the base material for creating a new society, bypassing adults and getting a new generation that you can literally indoctrinate, or do as you will with; that's always been the agenda.
Then, once that was done, they'd use psychology, indoctrinations, political correctness, etc, etc; and then, once the parents are really out of the picture altogether, and the parents accept that the government has all these rights over the children, then they would go into altering the children themselves, preferably in the womb and they wrote about this, back in the 1930s, altering children in the womb.
As I mentioned before, Tony Blair was a true believer in all of this, brought up in the Fabian Socialist tradition, a member of the Society; and, remember, part of this society is to do with revolution and there's a revolution going on in culture and genetics and this article here ties in and it's long-forgotten now but it was the 31st of August 2006:
Blair to tackle 'menace' children
Tomorrow's potential troublemakers can be identified even before they are born, Tony Blair has suggested. Mr Blair said it was possible to spot the families whose circumstances made it likely their children would grow up to be a "menace to society".
Now, remember, this is a politician, with a doctrine, speaking; so, it's a very broad brush really to use as he says: "menace to society". Anyone could be against his particular indoctrination and what he believes, would be a "menace to society"; remember that when you're listening to this topic.
He said teenage mums and problem families could be forced to take help to head off difficulties. He said the government had to intervene much earlier to prevent problems developing when children were older.
Now, remember too: these eugenicists that now call themselves, they're into bioethics, same thing though, nicer term; but they do believe that you inherit all your traits and characteristics, they believe you have the poverty gene, or the delinquent gene. They used to measure the space between the eyes, the distance, and measure your eye to your ear and all this stuff, back in the 1920s and '30s, when they were on a roll. Now, they try to use scientific terminology to cover it up but it's the same agenda. Here he says:
... the government had to intervene much earlier to prevent problems developing when children were older. There could be sanctions for parents who refused to take advice, he said.
Punishments - in other words.
The PM has returned from his summer holiday to face intense speculation about his plans to step down. In his first interview since his three-week stay in the Caribbean, Mr Blair insisted his policies could outlast his time in Downing Street.
That's quite the term he used there, because he "insisted his policies could outlast his time in Downing Street". I've heard other politicians say the same thing who have made drastic changes; and you'll find the bunch who comes in afterwards will often say it will take 10-20 years to unravel, legally, all the laws that were put in place, therefore they would not even start. That's why he can say that.
His aides say people are more interested in problems like anti-social behaviour than in talk about when the prime minister will quit. The Conservatives say the government should not try to run people's lives. And one think tank suggested it was almost "genetic determinism" to suggest children could turn out to be troublemakers before they were born. Mr Blair told BBC News his government had made "massive progress" in tackling social exclusion but there was a group of people with multiple problems. There had to be intervention "pre-birth even", he said.
Families with drug and alcohol problems were being identified too late, said Mr Blair. And there was a "pretty good chance" children of teenage mothers who were not in stable relationships would grow up in a "difficult set of circumstances" and develop behavioural problems.
Now, they'll always use extreme examples, to bring something in, remember that, because eventually they put it across the board for everyone.
He admitted many people might be uneasy with the idea of intervening in people's family life but said there was no point "pussy-footing".
In other words: to hell with you and your particular values.
But he said: "If we are not prepared to predict and intervene far more early then there are children who are growing up - in families which we know are dysfunctional - and the kids a few years down the line are going to be a menace to society and actually a threat to themselves."
They'll alter you, because they can tell, in the womb, that you're going to be a threat to yourself or society.
Help had to be offered, but "some sense of discipline and responsibility" had to be brought to bear, he said.
Then they go on with the different sanctions:
Official figures released in February showed the conception rate for girls aged 13-15 was 7.5 per 1,000 in 2004. Mr Blair did not specify exactly what changes he was preparing to make or how they would work. He pointed to the success of Sure Start centres in giving parents help. And he said sanctions, such as anti-social behaviour orders or parenting orders, were already in place for those who refused support.
They already had by-passed parents who had refused support. He says:
But experience from other countries suggested people were willing to get support if they knew where to get it, he added.
In other words: everyone really wants it, you just don't know that you want it.
Conservative policy director Oliver Letwin said: "The answer is not more state intervention. It is to encourage the social enterprise, the voluntary sector, community groups, to help people without trying to run their lives for them."
And it goes on and on and on. However, as I say, this is about eugenics, plain and simple, an idea that they had a hundred years ago, and longer; these very societies that Blair's a member of. That they could raise and control millions of people, with the use of science and even mentioning that, eventually, they'd have the ability to go into the womb and remove certain genes, or replace certain genes, until they have their perfect robotic citizen. Now, you think about it too: this kind of power, in the hands of politicians like Blair - and Brown is in now - who are really following their orders, they're part of a big control group and they really believe in this mission. That kind of power will be used; it's already being implemented in different sectors. It's a scary thing, because it's like the Soviet Union, if you had complained about the government, because you wouldn't go along with the new 'in' / politically correct phrase, or terminology, they said that you had inflexibility of opinions and they classified you as mentally ill and put you in the Gulag.
That is coming down here too, with this incredible political correctness, where you can't speak about certain things, under the fear of law. When you can't speak, or even ask a question about something and you're genuinely curious, you're under tyranny, which means there's a dominant minority above you controlling it all and we cannot go that way.
As you can see from this article here, politics really has nothing to do with what you think it is, it's simply following an agenda, it doesn't matter which party gets in, it really doesn't matter, the agenda continues, it's all to do with the United Nations as well: depopulation and creating better kinds of servants. Remember what Koestler and others said: The elite will retain all their survival capabilities but, he says, the rest of the public won't have them, they won't need them, because the State will be making all their decisions for them. Remember that. That's the world they're bringing in.
Here's another article here, I mean see they're so far gone and they’re so sure of themselves today that there's no opposition, because really, parents are kind of out the picture, they expect the State to bring up their children, they expect the State and the schools to give them their values. They don't spend time with them, they're either watching television and their children are playing computers or they're all playing computer games, or they're out of the house altogether. It's been a very deliberate warfare strategy, which has worked very well.
This is from the Daily Mail UK, February the 17th 2009 (By Sean Poulter):
British scientists condemn using children in GM food trials as unacceptable.
That’s genetically-modified food; they're using children now in the trials.
Children have been used as 'lab rats' in GM rice trials that were carried out in breach of ethics rules drawn up in response to the medical crimes of Nazi Germany, it is claimed. Youngsters aged 6-10 were fed so-called Golden Rice, which has been modified to contain enhanced levels of beta carotene or vitamin A.
And good knows what else they've put in there.
The rice is being developed to combat Vitamin A deficiency, which is linked to damage to the sight, poor brain development and immune system failure.
These are all the very things which they've been attacking us with. Your immune system is shot; pretty-well everyone from the 1950s onwards has got a defective immune system because of all the shots we've got. It says here:
However high consumption can also have harmful toxic effects and cause birth defects.
Of course they know this, they know this.
Critics are furious that the GM rice was not put through animal feeding trials to ensure it was safe before being given to children. The decision to use the children has been condemned as 'completely unacceptable' by a group of 22 scientists - all GM critics - from Britain and around the world.
I'll be back with more because they've been using it on the children in the US as well. Back, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading from an article concerning the GM (genetically-modified) food, where they put all kinds of weird genes into plants etc - in this case, it's rice - I don't think there's anything they've left alone, to be honest with you. It says here:
The decision to use the children has been condemned as 'completely unacceptable' by a group of 22 scientists - all GM critics - from Britain and around the world. They claim it is indicative of moves by the biotech lobby, led by the USA and biotech firms, to force GM food into the mouths of the world without proper assessment.
Well, you'd better believe it because, you see, it's a must-be; it's one of these must-be things. It doesn't matter how many assessments are done on the health risk etc of people that are becoming obvious as well, it's going to be forced on everyone, because it's part of the agenda. That's why no one can touch the big boys like Monsanto, you can't touch them; they've got protection.
The project was financed and run through the US National Institutes of Health and involved children in China and America. The scientists have written an open letter to the team behind the experiments, condemning the way they were conducted. It states: 'We are writing to express our shock and unequivocal denunciation of the experiments being conducted by your colleagues which involve the feeding of genetically modified Golden Rice to human subjects.'
It goes on to say there's been:
'woefully inadequate pre-clinical evaluation' of the rice. The scientists argue there is a large body of evidence showing GM food production can trigger gene mutations which 'can result in health damaging effects when GM food products are fed to animals'. The letter adds: 'Our greatest concern is that this rice, which is engineered to overproduce beta carotene, has never been tested in animals'.
And, to be honest with you, I don't care what they tell you the excuse is, I don't believe them anymore at all. That's how bad it is, you can't believe anything they tell you as to why they're doing things.
It says there is evidence that certain chemicals derived from beta carotene 'are both toxic and cause birth defects'. Critics of the GM experiments says the Nuremburg code states that children under 10 are not considered legally capable of giving consent to participation in such experiments.
Well, who cares about a few laws eh?
They say the code also requires that human guinea pigs should not be used if scientists have an alternative experimental method. Thirdly, experiments on humans should not be conducted until tests with animals have identified potential hazards.
Now, listen to this:
Among the leading bodies behind the GM Golden rice project are the biotech company Syngenta, the Rockefeller Foundation
Ah, I'm so amazed, I'm always so amazed, it's such a surprise.
and the charitable foundation set up by
Microsoft boss Bill Gates.
Well, you know something that Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation all have in common? Sterilisation, that's a little clue to everything they touch.
The list of signatories to the protest letter includes Malcolm Hooper, emeritus professor of medicinal chemistry at Sunderland University, who said: 'This type of experimentation is frightening - children as lab rats - it is not on.'
So, there you go. You can read this article for yourselves and I will put up the links, at the end of the show to this, but it just goes on and on and on. As I say, just go back to what they'd said they'd have to do - and that's by-pass all parental authority - and in fact, if possible, eliminate the family, eliminate it. Then the State will be in totally control of everyone, adult or children, it didn’t matter. And that's pretty-well happened, no one stands up for anyone anymore; and here's another article that ties in with this one. It's just astonishing how it rolls in, at the same time, that's your synchronicity, from Bloomberg.com, February the 9th. It says:
Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan
Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy. Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion.
This is standard isn't it? When they put these omnibus bills through, they stick through the stuff they don't want discussed.
These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department. Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH
There's a PDF version on this site at Bloomberg. It says:
The bill’s health rules will affect "every individual in the United States" (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial.
This is what they're telling you.
It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
Canada's way ahead, we had that when McClellan was in charge, years ago, a centralised computer, containing all of the data of every Canadian in one computer. There was uproar in Parliament, so they said: 'Ok, we'll solve it'; so they put it in two computers, so no one can have all the data, ha-ha-ha.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective.
Here's the part: 'cost effective'.
The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446).
Your doctor can't make the decisions now; that's what it's telling you, they're going to guide your doctor's decisions. It says:
These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.”
So, they've not to act like "solo practitioners" anymore, the government will decide what cheap medication you'll get. Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and this article from Bloomberg, really, is showing you the US is simply blending into the world system, they have the same systems across the planet now; and the US was the last to go under it. What they do, I know this from Britain and other countries, is they mark you down in hospital as to the importance of your value to the society; and they'll decide whether you should be resuscitated or not. It will also decide what kind of medication you should get, are you worth the extra expense of the better medications; this all ties into it.
According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”
Well, there's no point in having them thinking for themselves, if the government's going to tell them what to think and what to prescribe. It says:
Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far. New Penalties: Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users”
That's what they call them, "meaningful users"
of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541). What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional.
That's true, it's an intentional vagueness, because it's not good news.
In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.
Once again, you have these Non-Governmental Organisations running your governments, which eventually run our lives. That's the real meaning, when they talk about democracy, that's what it is.
Now, we'll go to the callers; and there's Tim from Delaware there. Are you there Tim?
Tim: Yes I'm here. How you doing?
Alan: Not so bad.
Tim: I actually got your book that I ordered and I really enjoyed it; and my question was about, did you ever see that interview by some guy that interviewed Rockefeller?
Alan: I can't hear you; can you speak up?
Tim: Did you ever see that interview from that one guy - it's on the Internet - about Rockefeller?
Alan: Where he talks about what?
Tim: Where he would be interviewed by some guy and he'd asked him about how he run the world and Rockefeller was, basically, interviewed.
Alan: Was that in Japan?
Alan: I think I did.
Tim: What did you think about it?
Alan: I think it was set up, to be honest with you, that particular video; that was the same guy I think who interviewed him that’s claimed that there was all these Triads in China going to knock over the New World Order or something, wasn't it?
Alan: I wasn't too sure of that movie at all.
Tim: Ok, thank you.
And there's Patty from Maryland there, are you there Patty?
Patty: Yes I am and it's an absolute honour to speak with you and your subject tonight is excellent, and so timely, because I just happened to be reading a book right now, it's called Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey N. Smith and it's all about the genetically-engineered foods. Now, he wrote it back in 2003; but I would just highly recommend it, it's a good primer for anyone who wants to read about the history of all of this.
Alan: Yes, it's quite a history too, it’s a long history.
Patty: It's incredible, I had no idea that the United States was getting into it as early as they did. Then, of course, he goes into how the UK was just fighting it. Of course the large corporations wanted to get the UK in on the GM food but researchers over there were saying that there's not enough good scientific research and so on. Now I’m only like maybe half-way through the book at this point. But it sounds like, from what you said tonight, that children are being experimented on. That's just atrocious.
Alan: Well, it's the same in Canada. Canada was the test bed for all GM food, for ten years, and the Government came out afterwards and admitted they had made a "Secret Deal" and that's the term they used in the newspapers, a secret deal with Monsanto and others, to test it out on the Canadians. We had no idea that we were the dummies.
Patty: Well, that's how I heard about it initially, it was from one of your shows and you were talking about that and then about the cross-pollination and it's just simply astounding. But I just want to commend you for the work that you're doing and I was just so excited when I was hearing you talk about, you know, exactly what I'm reading about, at the moment.
Alan: I think I've heard of that book, I think it is a good one.
Patty: Yes, it's very good, I would highly recommend it. It gives a good solid foundation for anyone who wants to pursue this.
Alan: What you also find too: is the incredible legal power that back Monsanto and others, no one can touch them. It's like the word has gone out to all judges, you don't rule against Monsanto.
Patty: Yes, absolutely, absolutely incredible. I work for a federal government agency and what I see going on it's - well I don't really want to say where it is - but what I see going on, it just amazes me and sickens me and I would given anything to just to be able to blow the whistle, just anything, but I'm too afraid right now.
Alan: Yes, everyone's afraid, especially if you're in or you actually hear about something that they know the public must never get a hold of. It can be very dangerous.
Patty: Well, yes, but what amazes me is people have such blinders on, I pointed out a few facts to some people who have been with this agency for like thirty-odd years and they told me I had no idea what I was talking about and I was telling them about the Polio vaccine and how the government knew it and a couple of scientists tried to warn, 'don't give them out, they’re tainted', and they just went ahead and did that, and I had a scientist tell me that I didn't know what I was talking about.
Alan: I know, that's it, they can always pull out their scientists and I'm telling you, amongst scientists, there's plenty prostitutes who will prostitute themselves for money and say whatever they're told to say to the public. We've had plenty of experience of that in the past. We're seeing the scientists leave the world council on weather, you know, in droves, in absolute droves but those same guys were quite happy to tell lies for years to the public. Now, they're scared of their jobs because they're losing credibility
Patty: Well, yeah, that; but you know, gosh, the more I look around, I'm really going out on a limb now but I'm sure they're not listening anyway! But the more I look around my work environment and I really study these scientists and I've gotten to know them, I have come to realise that a lot of them would never ever be able to make it in the real world.
Alan: The real world.
Patty: I mean, I'm in an administrative position. I see all kinds of things that go on and not quite understanding the science, but I understand enough to know that a lot of them are just in their labs and they're just playing, they're like little children, just tinkering around with this and that.
Alan: They also must keep churning out any kind of reports, every so often, because they live on grants, they live for the grant handouts.
Patty: Yes, well, and I hand out a lot of grants, we're not only receiving them, alright, so I just told where I work! You know what: I don't care, I really don't care, I just. The FDA has a building next to my building and, oh my, it's just, ugh, it just makes me ill.
Alan: I saw a video with the FDA and it was about Monsanto in fact and they showed you some of the people who were on the Board for the FDA; and there was one woman, she's been a member of Monsanto three times and into politics, back with Monsanto and then she ended up on the Board of the FDA, back to Monsanto and then back to the FDA again. I mean, it's completely staffed with people who are ex-Monsanto. Or else, it's the big Glaxo-Kline drug companies and so on you know.
Patty: Well, I don't even want to go near the drug companies, I mean, I have Rheumatoid Arthritis and the treatment that I was given just about killed me; so, I'm not doing anything right now. And of course the doctors at work think I'm horrible, because I refuse to make the Mexatrexate which is a cancer treatment and then the Remicade and they want me to get involved in a clinical study and I keep saying 'no'. I refuse.
Alan: Clinical studies are dangerous to your health!
Patty: Oh my gosh yeah.
Alan: They'll try all kinds of experimental stuff there you know.
Patty: It's funny because if you bring up 'Oh I might do, be involved with a clinical study', most scientists look at you in horror and say "don't"! Now what does that tell you?!
Alan: I know, we're all guinea pigs, all guinea pigs.
Patty: Yes we are and it's very-very sad. Well, look, I don't want to take up any more of your time, but I love your show, I've learned so much and I get the books that you recommend and I'm reading them and I'm learning an awful lot.
Alan: It all ties together eh?
Patty: Yes, they do.
Alan: It does.
Patty: It's amazing, it's amazing.
Alan: Well, thanks for calling, Patty.
Patty: Ok, thank you.
Alan: Bye now.
Alan: Yes, it's difficult for a lot of people, you know, there are so many people out there who could say something, but they're in very delicate situations with their work situations and we know how ruthless they can be at the top. Very ruthless, it's no problem at all firing people or leaning on them, in different ways. Or their relatives, that's done as well; and it’s the same thing with people with families, they'll lean on guys and actually tell them, I've heard a few people tell me this, on the phone-line, not on the radio though, that they'll lean on their families, 'You'll lose your family' and all this kind of stuff 'if you continue down this route'; and that's the kind of thing in the real world that goes on, it's not pleasant at all.
Here's an article here, again from Britain, it ties right in to what I said, you know. Now, remember Bertrand Russell had his own experimental schools in the 1920s, where all of this kind of stuff was tried out; and he was given a free hand, under a Royal Charter, to do things to children that would have most people in jail. He was trying to see if they could do pre-pubertal sex, that's now getting pushed everywhere now. The idea being: that if you can encourage children to be obsessed with it, before puberty, there is less likelihood that they'll bond with a partner for life, down the road; they want to destroy the family. And look how far we've come, in no time at all; and I've already gone through the talks with the culture creation industries and so on and how they gave us our culture, which is so degraded now, we're at the mercy of the politicians and the big agendas of Globalism. This is from the Telegraph, Thursday the 19th of February 2009:
Contraceptive implants given to girls as young as 12
Girls as young as 12 are being given contraceptive implants on the NHS [National Health Service] without the consent of their parents.
Well, who needs to bother about parents anymore? I can remember the day back when teachers and schools and governments would run when the parents were after them. Not now, they don't even bother getting the consent of the parents; and the parents aren't generally bothered either. This is by Lucy Cockcroft. It says:
The procedure is regularly given to under-16s
Regularly given to under-16s.
who are not deemed responsible enough to remember to take oral contraceptives on a daily basis. Doctors inject a plastic implant under the skin of the young girls, which releases the hormone progesterone, guarding against pregnancy for up to three years. The procedure is regularly given to under-16s who are not deemed responsible enough to remember to take oral contraceptives on a daily basis.
They're not going to stop just at getting you in the womb and altering you and making you the person that you really should be, you know the kind they would rather have. They're also going to give these and they're giving them to young children now, young girls. It says:
Girls aged 13 and 14 are also considered, while in Scotland, a 12-year-old who became pregnant at 11 has been given the implant.
What do they watch on TV all the time? Have you noticed? Have you noticed what's on much music all the time? What is it they're pushing? It's not lollipops. And you wonder why 'monkey see, monkey do'? Plato talked about this, 2,300-odd years ago, how easy it was, through drama and fiction and music, to have the youngsters emulate everything that they saw on stage. Rocket science, isn't it? Bernays, all these boys, the ones who gave us the culture, and the CIA was involved in culture creation, and everyone thought it was the Communists, because it was all so far ultra-ultra liberal: do what you want, put it all in the open, let it all hang out; look where we are now.
Guidelines issued by the Government last April said the implant, known by the brand name Implanon or as the progestogen-only implant, was safe and there should be no age limit.
There should be no age limit, it says here, according to the government, you know that big God up there on the big mountain.
The NHS then allowed the contraceptive to be used on young girls who have become sexually active.
See, it's a step-by-step implementation, until people get used to it.
Supporters of the implants say that they will help reduce teenage pregnancies among girls who are reluctant to use condoms, and do not remember to take the Pill.
However, they won't tell you about all the other effects it will have on the girls that are taking it. I've already read the reports by Huxley and by Charles Galton Darwin. Charles Galton Darwin said they would get in to the hormonal structure of youngsters, emasculate the males and, basically, make the females more masculine. Have you looked around you today? They've been doing it and there are side-effects to all of these pills, all of them. It says:
However, critics argue that offering this kind of contraceptive will put more young girls at risk of sexually transmitted infections.
This is their only objection.
They also argue that making the implant so readily available will encourage more girls to have a sexual relationship before they are ready.
Well, why not emulate television, that's what you seem to see there all the time. They never attack that, do they? They never ever attack, or go into what might be causing things to happen, never ever, they won't touch it, because it's a must-be. I've gone into it before, where the censor bureaus for television, each country's got them, I used to think it was to kind of keep your culture safe until I read in the papers their job is to test the public to see if they're ready to push the envelope even further for the public. That's what their job really is; look where we are.
Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.
Before the show ends tonight, I should mention too that you can help keep me going and support me by buying the material that I have for sale that's on the website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can also help donate as well. You can donate money on that site, there's buttons there to show you how to do it and that helps things tick over. I don't ask for money or payment from any of the shows that I'm on, on any station, or TV; and it's up to you to keep me going if you like what I'm saying. And I'm not saying it to scare people, I'm not saying it just to cause some kind of panic either, I'm trying to get people motivated into making their own decisions as to what they will do in life and try and influence those around you, if possible, at least people who are worth influencing. Don't waste your time on people who close their minds; it's the most frustrating thing of all. They have chosen not to know, they prefer the cocooned world that television presents to them, that's the reality they prefer. It is a choice, it truly is a choice and we've got to respect that decision that they have; but where you can, and there's always someone out there you can actually, you should always push and give information and don't overload people, because that turns people off.
Don't mix in the fantasy stuff that's popular either, you know, the people who are into space alien abductions and stuff like that. There's an awful lot of nonsense put out there right now, which I think, personally, is meant to ridicule the patriot movements, when you bring in the New Age stuff with the facts, you ridicule the facts; and this is intentional, I believe.
So, stick to the facts, to those things that people can understand and you can go long ways with it, because big movements are happening / big things are happening across the world and the boys at the top are on a roll. They smell blood, they smell their destination, almost at hand and we cannot give up without a fight. We can't give up without a fight, that's a disgrace to ourselves, it's a disgrace to all those who have lived before us, utter disgrace to give up and cave in, under political correctness and what we're taught is the new ways etc, etc. That's tragedy and shame to simply stand back and say there's nothing I can do. As long as you breathe, there's something you can do, or say, but there's always something. It's a cop out.
Also look into the new religion that's in that's called Humanism, Humanism for Schools, I'll leave the link up, as well, to show you how they're taught to train in the schools Secular Humanism. If you wonder why all these stickers are on the buses that say "God is dead" - after Nietzsche of course - and why they're going to all this length and money to do so, it's to make you feel apathetic, basically, nihilistic and apathetic. It's necessary for control during the time that's coming. You'll see how they even put out what they call teaching toolkits and how to get it over to the students, in a way that will be psychologically adapted to them. In other words: they'll be downloaded with an opinion that they never really came to themselves. It's all scientific indoctrination; and you can search through the Secular Humanist areas, all their techniques for instilling this into children. All they're doing is replacing the old religions with a new religion; and that's what Secular Humanism is and it's also a religion that gives you no hope, by the way. They want to destroy hope.
Well, from Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada: it's goodnight; and may your God, or your gods - go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Topics of show covered in following links:
"Blair to tackle 'menace'
children" (news.bbc.co.uk) - Aug. 31, 2006.
"British scientists condemn using children in GM food trials as unacceptable" by Sean Poulter (dailymail.co.uk) - Feb. 17, 2009.
"Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan" Commentary by Betsy McCaughey (bloomberg.com) - Feb. 9, 2009.
"Contraceptive implants given to girls as young as 12" by Lucy Cockcroft (telegraph.co.uk) - Feb. 18, 2009.
"Humanism For Schools | Humanist Perspectives" (humanismforschools.org.uk).
"Humanism For Schools | Teaching Toolkits" (humanismforschools.org.uk).
"American Humanist Association" (americanhumanist.org).