"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
Live on RBN (#214)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 12, 2008:
Russell Backed by Powerful Muscle:
"We Must Bow Down to Wise Men
Genetically Selected for Special Breeding,
Guided by Scientists, Intellectual Talent,
Tennis-Ball Theories, Not So Reliant,
While Sterilized Commoners Work and Have Fun,
Heads Full of Trivia, Intellect They've None,
Prattling On About Hollywood Stars,
Rutting, Childless Affairs from Red-Lit Bars,
This Lifestyle Makes Them Loveless, Coarse,
Unable to Bond, Self-Will, No Remorse,
Until Their Kind has All Died Away,
Replaced by Clones with Nothing to Say"
© Alan Watt Dec. 12, 2008
Friday 12th December 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 12, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December the 12th 2008.
I always advise newcomers, and there's always newcomers coming in all the time, every week to listen to the show and this is on RBN live right now. I advise them to go to www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com because I have all the previous shows from over the years archived there and I try and fill in the big reality, the one you don't see, the one in fact the whole system tries to prevent you from seeing. I try to fill in for you, fill in all the gaps and show you the whys and wherefores of the big events that happen in your lifetime. Mainly because they were planned before you were born, and the whole plan has been published, over and over. Not only published, they’re even publishing the next couple of centuries' plans right now, here and there, you'll read the articles on it. Big international meetings are on the go all the time; and they have been for a very, very long time, all networking together, big Foundations, NGOs, well-funded and they're all on board with consensus towards the same destination, which is not too pleasant for most people, although the people themselves will never really understand it or know it, even when it’s happening to them.
Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can download transcripts which of these particular past shows, and you can download and print them up and pass them round to your friends. They're done in the various languages of Europe.
We are going into this new system, the new system which is truly the first scientifically-controlled society. We've been under science for a long time, statistics run our lives, statistics run governments. We have departments of statistics. George Orwell talked about it, when he published his book in 1948, the book called 1984, when he had this background of statistics being spewed out on the television screens back then, before they had television. They knew everything was coming this way, because they were already using all the different graphs and data collection and projecting the future and it was all to do with controlling and maintaining control over the general population.
What the public don't know is the big stick or the front to the new religion, the whole earth-based religion, as Gorbachev said, over and over and he has since, from his first book and onwards he said it in every major speech. It must be based on a form of Earth worship and that's where they tie it in with science, that spews out all this data about CO2 and they call it ‘climate change’, now that ‘global warming’ has taken a nose dive. I just call it ‘the weather’, since the weather's always been here. And, that's going to control everyone's life, because the full measure of security forces will eventually come into line to manage every world society, every society across the planet, every individual across the planet. There'll be taxes and fines and imprisonment for breaking laws to do with this big invisible farce of climate change. As I say, they're already trading carbon debt, from one country to another, another big con game, because the big corporations that were supposedly going to be the ones that had to pay these particular fees, you could buy them in advance in fact, were given them mainly for free, by the Economic Union, probably the same in the Americas too. Now they're making money off them, some big corporations are $5 million to $5 billion richer. The tax payer pays it all. I'll be back with more, after these messages.
=== BREAK ===
I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the big hoax that's going on, “The biggest scandal in history”, as some scientists are calling it. This whole nonsense over climate change, the watered-down term from global warming is now climate change, officially. As I say, that eventually will be the big stick to control every individual's life. How far back does all this go? Because you see, the big Foundations that came out, all over the world, in fact, in the 1800s, were really front organisations to offset this thing called democracy; and, they were also set up to guide the world along a direct path. Foundations would fund all kinds of sides, they even created sides, because it's good to have conflict between sides and then you come to some agreements, and then, from the agreements, you've got a form of a treaty and then you're now on board in the same direction, you see? That's how you do it, you create the conflicts and they said that they'd create wars, right down to gender wars, in the 1800s; and they published these books. Mind you, at that time, most folk couldn't read or write; so, they published an awful lot around that period, because only their own type, their own class were reading it and they had no objections. When we look over old books, by big world leaders, and they were world leaders, because these characters sat in on the talks with many of the big Foundations, big Think Tanks, to plan the future that we are living through right now, the period that we're living through right now and the future that will come out of it. And, traditionally, with some of these big Think Tanks and organisations, like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is one of the biggest ones out there, with its other sister companies, the Council on Foreign Relations, running the US side. They knew back in the early 1920s where they were taking the world; and, they also knew that most of them would not live to see the outcome; they'd only do their part towards it. That's what Masons do, they model their terminology after architecture and after building, brick-building basically, big cathedrals; and; if you look at the Medieval Times, it would take maybe five to seven generations of stone masons to complete a cathedral, a single church. Each one, prior to the last one, would never see the completed thing in their lifetime. That's how they work and that's why they use this terminology of Freemasonry, they know they'll never see it in their own lifetime.
Now let’s go back to Bertrand Russell once again. Now, he never sat at a crystal ball or had such a fantastic mind that he had some kind of clairvoyance ability, some Nostrodamic type ability to see into the future. Whatever he wrote was because he'd already sat in the big Think Tanks and in the higher sciences which were not available to the public. It's the same today: the higher sciences are kept secret from the public. We are living in the lowest level of science, at the bottom here; and, that's from professorship down. Whatever he said, was because he was in on the planning of much of this and this is from his own material, from The Scientific Outlook, published in 1931, a couple of years before Huxley brought out his Brave New World.
The reason they were all on board with their writings was because they were all sitting on the same Think Tanks and they were also sitting on the Policy decision-making organisations that were directing governments even then.
From page 248: He's talking about the types of workers there'll be, because he talked about breeding a governing class. Now, the reason he was talking about breeding them, was because, in his day, they were already doing it. They'd been doing it a 100 years before him and you'll find that, like Charles Darwin for instance, you'll find, I think it was Ian Taylor wrote the book Darwin and the New World Order (In the Minds of Men is the other title of it). He goes into the genealogy of Darwin, and you'll see how interbred Darwin's family already was; and, that's only one family, many of the other ones were the same. The same with the Huxley’s, the same with Bertrand Russell and so on. They were breeding specific types, to be rulers and other types to be world managers for running the politics and other ones to be the scientific elite. Huxley fell into the scientific-elite type. Russell himself was between the scientific elite and the ruling minority, “The Dominant Minority” as he called them.
As for the manual workers, they will be discouraged from serious thought
Now think of all the media that's put out today for the average person. The workers:
will be discouraged from serious thought: they will be made as comfortable as possible, and their hours of work will be much shorter than they are at present
This was 1931
they will have no fear of destitution or of misfortune to their children. As soon as working hours are over, amusements will be provided, of a sort calculated to cause wholesome mirth,
Meaning basic slapstick comedy almost, that's what he means by that, trivia,
and to prevent any thoughts of discontent which otherwise might cloud their happiness.
They were meant just be happy, dumb and stupid. Later on in the book, he actually says that: dumb and stupid. He says:
On those rare occasions when a boy or girl who has passed the age at which it is usual to determine social status shows such marked ability as to seem the intellectual equal of the rulers,
In other words: one who has broken through their indoctrination.
a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates
His class, in other words.
and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers,
The governing class.
he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt.
You see, revolution is something they've always been terrified of. Remember what Mao Tse-tung said, he was afraid of an idea, someone with an idea. So, the whole idea is, if you have what it takes and you can verbalise it and you have the knowledge to communicate your thoughts to others, on a certain scale, they'd have to bring you into the fold, or eliminate you. The lethal chamber he calls it and they won't tolerate you walking around causing 'anarchy', as they like to term it. What is 'anarchy'? Anarchy is any other system or way of living outside the one they have designed.
On page 252, of the Scientific Outlook, Bertrand Russell says this:
I've been talking a lot about sterility and so on, in the last few shows.
Scientific breeding, in any truly scientific form, would at present encounter insuperable obstacles both from religion and from sentiment.
This is from 1931.
To carry it out scientifically it would be necessary, as among domestic animals, to employ only a small percentage of males for purposes of breeding. It may be thought that religion and sentiment will always succeed in opposing an immovable veto to such a system. I wish I could think so. But I believe that sentiment is quite extraordinarily plastic,
The emotions are plastic.
and that the individualistic religion to which we have been accustomed is likely to be increasingly replaced by a religion of devotion to the State.
“Devotion to the State”, that's what's being brought in now, it's a World State and it's to be religion and devotion to the State, coupled with Earth worship and so on. Our home etc. We can understand what our home is, so it's all nice and fuzzy and wonderful and warm and we’ll have these scientific elite dictating everything to us; the new priesthood.
On page 243, he says:
I think, therefore, that there is hardly any limit to the departures from traditional sentiment which science may introduce into the question of reproduction. If the simultaneous regulation of quantity and quality is taken seriously in the future, we may expect that in each generation some 25 per cent, of women
That's all they'll need.
and some 5 per cent, of men will be selected to be the parents of the next generation, while the remainder of the population will be sterilized,
Now, those who have followed the talks I've been giving, and have listened to the data I've been broadcasting about the sterilisation of males, primarily males; and females too are having tremendous problems because in about the '60s massive Chlamydia broke out, long term infection and most of them are unaware they have it, it's sexually-transmitted and that's part of the reason they promoted the sexual revolution, because during it, many-many women became sterilised. Their egg can't get through the fallopian tubes, because it's so heavily fibrosed with scar tissue, through this long-term, low-grade infection. He's saying here, that 5% of men will be selected, maybe 25% of females, the ones that they want, the stock that they want. I've already gone through the Cold Spring's Harbour, cold water harbour project of the Eugenics Society in America. Well, these characters were all in touch with Huxley's predecessors. It's a continuous movement in eugenics.
the remainder of the population will be sterilized, which will in no way interfere
Listen to this now, 1931:
which will in no way interfere with their sexual pleasures,
Because they were going to promote promiscuity you see.
but will merely render these pleasures destitute of social importance.
There will be no offspring. No offspring; this was planned a long time ago and I've given you the facts of what's happened. It's up to you to put 2 and 2 together. I'll be back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt we're Cutting Through The Matrix, just putting the big coincidences together for you, because that's how you're supposed to see it, as you grow up in this world. Everything that happens is just one big foul-up, unforeseen and, even though people talked about making this all happen many years ago, people think it is all just coincidence. They believe in coincidence theories one after another, it's rather extraordinary.
I'll continue on a little bit, this book The Scientific Outlook, because, what Russell is talking about here, he and others of his own peer group had discussed in many different forums, these guys were policy-makers for, basically, for the World, for the world that was already underway in his life and that is here today.
He's talking about the women that would be selected to bear children and so on. He says:
No obstacles will be placed upon their relations with sterile men
These are breeding women. He says:
or upon the relations of sterile men and women with each other,
All the taboos would be gone, the social taboos.
but reproduction will be regarded as a matter which concerns the State, and will not be left to the free choice of the persons concerned.
We've already seen it in the newspapers, article after article of who has a right to pass on their genes, that's what it's all about too, because it's all the same movement, right? Same Foundations funding it. He says:
Perhaps it will be found that artificial impregnation is more certain and less embarrassing, since it will obviate the need of any personal contact between the father and mother of the prospective child. Sentiments of personal affection may still be connected with intercourse not intended to be fruitful, while impregnation will be regarded in an entirely different manner, more in the light of a surgical operation, so that it will be thought not ladylike to have it performed in the natural manner.
You can do anything with people, they're plastic, you see?
The qualities for which parents will be chosen will differ greatly according to the status which it is hoped the child will occupy. In the governing class
There's to be a self-perpetuating governing class. It's already here, you'll find most of the bureaucrats are 4th, 5th, 6th generation bureaucrats and they tend to all inter-marry with each other. That's across the world. He says:
a considerable degree of intelligence will be demanded of parents; perfect health will, of course, be indispensable. So long as gestation is allowed to persist to its natural period, mothers will also have to be selected by their capacity for easy delivery,
He goes on to do with their frame, pelvic system and so on and so on. He says:
The care of infants intended to belong to the governing class would seldom be left to the mothers. Mothers would be selected by their eugenic qualities, and these would not necessarily be the qualities required in a nurse. On the other hand, the early months of pregnancy might be more burdensome than at present, since the foetus would be subjected to various kinds of scientific treatment
The foetus, in the womb, would be subject to various kinds of scientific treatment.
intended to affect beneficially not only its own characteristics but those of its possible descendants.
They're talking about altering the gene make-up in the womb itself and that's just come out in papers recently; and, psychiatry also wants to get into the womb, to prevent mental illness from happening. And this guy's writing this in 1931; and, he was no prophet, the guy was no prophet. He says:
Fathers would, of course, have nothing to do with their own children. There would be in general only one father to every five mothers, and it is quite likely that he would never have even seen the mothers of his children.
Well, we have these seed banks today and whoever they tell you the donor is, you don't know that for sure, do you? You don't know. You don't even know if the donor has been modified himself. It says:
The sentiment of paternity would thus disappear completely. Probably in time the same thing would happen, though to a slightly less degree, in regard to mothers. If birth were prematurely induced, and the child separated from its mother at birth, maternal sentiment would have little chance to develop.
Among the workers it is probable that less elaborate care would be taken, since it is easier to breed for muscle than to breed for brains, and it is not unlikely that women would be allowed to bring up their own children in the old-fashioned natural manner. There would not be, among the workers, the same need as among the governors for fanatical devotion to the State, and there would not be, therefore, on the part of the government the same jealousy of the private affections. Among the governors, one must suppose, all private sentiments would be viewed with suspicion.
In other words: they don't want emotion, emotion is to be taboo amongst the governing and scientific classes, frowned upon and reported, they don't want that, you see? He goes on later in the book, to talk about how emotion clouds the thoughts of good science, it gets in the way. This human part of us must be eliminated, you see. He says:
What should we expect of the mental make-up of people in such a world? The manual workers may, I think, be fairly happy. One may assume that the rulers will be successful in making the manual workers foolish and frivolous;
That's the culture they've given us, look at any newspaper today, look at Yahoo, Google and all the rest of them, with the bimbos on the side, all the ridiculous stories of trivia, mixed with horror and nothing's real. It's surrealistic; everything's a comedy, a bizarre, macabre comedy.
One may assume that the rulers will be successful in making the manual workers foolish and frivolous; work will not be too severe, and there will be endless amusements of a trivial sort. Owing to sterilization, love affairs need not have awkward consequences so long as they are not between a man and woman who are both of them unsterilized.
This has all happened, but it was planned long before it happened. I'll be back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, bringing you to a higher understanding that everything's that happening in your life, was planned that way and introduced by big powers, with lots of backing, political, governmental, bureaucratic, in cooperation with big companies like chemical companies and so on. The ones that made the cosmetics, that's who makes them, chemical companies. Chemical companies are part of the military-industrial complex, by their very nature; and, we have seen the reports - and they're all admitting it now, fifty years after the facts - that most men now are almost sterile. Oh, they just screwed-up, they didn't know. They didn't know, even though when they discovered Bysphenol A, back in the 1800s, they knew what the effects there would be then on the male. They also knew the effects, very shortly thereafter, of how it would affect the male as a fœtus, in the womb, from 8-12 weeks, the most crucial time for your sexual organs to develop. And, we've all been under attack.
To continue with The Scientific Outlook by Bertrand Russell, page 257. He's talking about the easy-going and frivolous pleasures etc, for the common people. Then he talks about the governing class:
The psychology of the governors will be a more difficult matter. They will be expected to display an arduous and hard-working devotion to the ideal of the scientific State, and to sacrifice to this ideal all the softer sentiments such as love of wife and children.
They must go.
Friendships between fellow-workers, whether of the same or of different sexes, will tend to become ardent, and will not infrequently overstep the limits which the public moralists will have fixed. In such a case the authorities will separate the friends, unless in doing so they will interrupt some important research or administrative undertaking.
Basically, the whole sexual lifestyle will be turned upside-down; and, thirty years after Russell wrote his book, his book here, we had what they called the sexual revolution that came along with the 1960s, where they brought in the free love, the drugs, as Huxley also advocated, drugging society. The whole agenda was just run right down, through society, so quickly and fast because it was well-planned. They had lots of planning in the past, years of planning and it was quite easy to implement it. It says here too, on 259, or 258:
In such a world, though there may be pleasure, there will be no joy. The result will be a type displaying the usual characteristics of vigorous ascetics. They will be harsh and unbending, tending towards cruelty in their ideals and their readiness to consider that the infliction of pain is necessary for the public good.
You've seen all the Ninjas out there, all ready to batter the people on the heads. They've been given 20-odd years with video games to desensitise them from violence and using violence. They were bred, in other words, and trained for their purpose today. We've also seen what's happening in science, as they go further ahead and chop up bodies that are all donated to them, like it was nothing. That also desensitises the young scientists coming into the job, as part of it; desensitises them, just chopping up bodies. They're all donated by people who think it's going to help other people. Now we hang them on wires in art studios, again to basically desensitise the whole public. So, no joy etc:
They will be harsh and unbending, tending towards cruelty in their ideals and their readiness to consider that the infliction of pain is necessary for the public good.
Torture: torture's been in the news now and they've even said well it's justifiable, yeah, justifiable.
I do not imagine that pain will be much inflicted as punishment for sin, since no sin will be recognized except insubordination and failure to carry out the purposes of the State. It is more probable that the sadistic impulses which the asceticism will generate will find their outlet in scientific experiment. The advancement of knowledge will be held to justify much torture of individuals by surgeons, biochemists, and experimental psychologists.
That's already happening.
As time goes on the amount of added knowledge required to justify a given amount of pain will diminish, and the number of governors attracted to the kinds of research necessitating cruel experiments will increase. Just as the sun worship of the Aztecs demanded the painful death of thousands of human beings annually, so the new scientific religion will demand its holocausts of sacred victims. Gradually the world will grow more dark and more terrible. Strange perversions of instinct will first lurk in the dark corners and then gradually overwhelm the men in high places. Sadistic pleasures will not suffer the moral condemnation that will be meted out to the softer joys, since, like the persecutions of the Inquisition, they will be found in harmony with the prevailing asceticism. In the end such a system must break down either in an orgy of bloodshed or in the rediscovery of joy.
Russell goes on and on and on and he says that there should be a Dictatorship. He was all for this particular one, the Scientific Dictatorship that will make all this happen. That's the reality of these characters. They used to publish a lot of their agenda. They're becoming a bit more careful about what they give to the public. They use Madison Avenue, as Russell and others and Huxley suggested they do, to basically propagandise us. You propagandise the public with the data; in other words, you rephrase it and make it sound nice and fuzzy, and the public accept it quite naturally. It's interesting here, that they were talking about a method of uniting the world, because in a world without war obviously the government has a hard time keeping control of people, because government's main function, at least it has been for many centuries, is at least the front that it uses to protect people, its citizens; and, without war what are they going to do? They'll need terror, everywhere, or some new bogeyman.
Russell said there is no nonsense so arrant (meaning so stupid, crazy and ridiculous), “There's no nonsense so arrant that it cannot be made the creed, the belief of the vast majority, by adequate government action”. And he already went through the ways of that and I've done it too: repetition – repetition - repetition. Climate change - climate change - climate change. Global warming - global warming - global warming and so on. And we have Gorbachev admitting that he's an atheist and yet he admits, as well, he's part of the team helping to create this global religion. This tying in with what they call governance, the planned society. It's also going to use the Chinese Communist ideas of, for the first stages, one child per family. They will really tax people to death in places like Australia, for having more than one child, because they'll be claiming they're going to put more CO2 out into the atmosphere. There's no nonsense so arrant that cannot be made the creed (the belief) of the vast majority by adequate government action.
Here we have world meetings on this farce; I say a farce, as I said the other day, where hundreds and hundreds of scientists are leaving the IPCC, to save their credibility, because they admit the whole thing is bogus. It's run on bogus science. And, because all the data is proving we're in a cooling period - and I should know that, I've got three feet of snow up here, and it's -20° right now and dropping - then they've changed it to climate change, which I just call the weather, because that's what climate change is. It's called the weather, weather is always changing.
This is an article that came out today; and, it's from Google news, it's also, I think on the AFP. It says:
China welcomes EU climate deal, says US must do more
China is going to tell the US to do more!
POZNAN, Poland China's top negotiator at the UN climate talks
I call it “weather talks”.
welcomed the climate pact adopted by EU leaders on Friday as a "positive step," but criticised carbon reduction goals set by US president-elect Barack Obama as too weak. In an interview with AFP, Su Wei said the deal struck at the European Union's summit in Brussels as "a positive step." "We welcome that," Su said. "It is important that European Union continue to take the lead in the international cooperation to address
He added, though: "Maybe some of the positions have been watered down compared to 2007.
This is a Chinaman with a sense of humour: the weather has been watered down!
"Of course, we understand in the face of the international financial crisis, countries put more efforts to address that crisis. But we think measures to address
should not in any way be delayed or watered down."
Well, isn't it amazing, again, how all this is coming together and you would think, if the world were real, and portrayed the way it is, as real, that during a financial catastrophe as we're going through now, which is brought on and deliberate, you would offset other things, so we could all survive. No, they've got the knife in your belly and they want to twist it, at the same time. That tells you there's another agenda at work here, you see. It's an agenda to bring the whole planet down, into a new system of economics, where you will serve the World State, you will work for the world State, you will serve the World State, that's what's coming out of this new economic system tied in with this weather nonsense. Su, this Chinese man, he says:
whose fast-industrialising nation has overtaken the United States as the world's leading emitter of CO2 -- qualified this. "I also heard the very firm political commitments from the ministers of the EU and from the European environment commissioner" Stavros Dimas, he said. The European Union's so-called 20-20-20 package
That's interesting, you see they've given you three 20s there and you put 3x2 3x2 3x2 it's 666. They love their jokes; they love their jokes, right in front, in plain view to the public. He says the:
package seeks to cut greenhouse-gas emissions by 20 percent by 2020
That's your 20-20-20. Three 20s you see 3x20 each way, that’s 666. And, they want to cut it up by 20%.
The Chinese negotiator said Obama's plan to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 was well short of the mark.
This is from China that doesn't have any problems with emitting black stuff out of all their chimneys, they've killed off half their rivers there with pollution and they're telling the US - because they're all in the same scam together. I was going to say that Huxley himself talked about this World Oligarchy running the world, made up of the elite families of each country. The ones who'd gone through the Darwinian process of selective breeding, got very wealthy - through all means possible - and kept breeding with their own kinds. They would run the world; and, they are running the world, so the Chinese elite you see and they're very old families in China that came through the Communist system and they're just as wealthy as ever, even more so now. They're also in on the act and they still run China. Here he says:
"We don't think it is ambitious enough," said Su, a top official for climate change
Or weather change.
at the National Development and Reform Commission in Beijing. Under the Kyoto Protocol, which the United States signed but then refused to ratify,
See, that's been the strategy the US has played since it created the League of Nations. They created it and then, because of the outcry at home, they didn't go in with it. Even though they put an official representative there with full voting powers and the public didn't know that. They didn't know that until they created the United Nations, the phoenix bird, from the League of Nations.
Even if the United States met Obama's 2020 target it would "mean that they are 20 years behind what is required," said Su.
Do realise, to meet those targets, they're going to have to cut down, or shut down, every coal plant there is? It means you've got to have fewer people breathing air, it means you'll have pretty well have no vehicles on the road at all. And, that is their game, because in Agenda 21, out of the same United Nations, we're supposed to all live in these habitat areas; and, for the next 30-odd years, the population is to gradually dwindle. I read their own reports, from the top Think Tanks, from the United Nations, on population control. I've read the same reports from the Think Tanks that work for NATO, the NATO countries, the British Military and the American Military and they all agree that, just by magic, the population after 2030 is to go drastically low, just drastically decline. Why is that? It’s because we'll all be sterile. They know all this, they know all this stuff; and, the fewer people the better.
You know, the Department of Food for the United Nations, the Department of Food and Agriculture have said that they could feed maybe a few million people living in a high tech industrialised society, at a good comfort of level that that society can provide, or, this is the other thing they could do: they could feed, I think it was 8 billion people at the level of peasants. Therefore, either we all turn into peasants living on the land - not that they want us on the land, or would ever allow that to happen - or they're going to have to reduce the population drastically, down to a few million. And, that's been the agenda, as I say, from before the days of Bertrand Russell. It's quite fascinating to see the things that have been going on, quite fascinating.
I saw an article today, where the cola companies have been trying to get their big inroad into India and it's so wonderful where people from a different culture have a different world view, a different way of seeing some things, seeing the same thing from a different vantage point. They found, in India, that it was cheaper to buy Coke as a pesticide for their plants on the farms, than to buy the regular pesticide because Coke contained, I think 20-30% more pesticide than the stuff they buy. We already know what it does to the people in the West and I've given talks about this in the past. Of course it was just one big screw-up, nobody knew, right? Well, they always knew, so why did they let it happen? Why did they let it keep happening? Well, we know, because that's the agenda.
Here's an article here along the same agenda, from the London Times, this was edition Monday the 11th of May 1987.
London Times: Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus, by Pearce Wright, Science Editor.
The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is studying new evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defence virus…
Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, tying together all the coincidences for you - and it's up to you where you want to take them, or deny them - but, the facts are the facts.
I'm reading an article from the London Times, May the 11th 1987, which I'm sure is a cover in itself, it's covering up, it's a scurry, a damage control, because what we all knew at the time, those with a memory, is that sure enough, it was in the wake of all these injections, the inoculations for small pox that left this big massive trail behind of people suddenly with HIV infections and AIDS, which are, technically, two different things. It says that:
Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.
But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times: 'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.' 'In obliterating one disease, another was transformed.'
I would say one was introduced.
Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed services are immunized as a precaution against possible biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.
This discovery of how people with sub-clinical HIV infection are at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox vaccination.
Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had been involved in any homosexual activity. In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing countries.
Now, I've already gone through the agenda, that was written along time ago, with big top economists involved, where they talked about the necessity to rapidly bring down the birth rate and increase the death rate of the Third World, because they couldn't see them coming in to a productive 8 to 5 type society, Monday to Friday type deal. They're too natural for that; and then, you have this coming out, and don't forget too: it was the World Health Organisation that did sterilise millions of women in Africa and India, when they gave them what they pretended was a free Tetanus shot for all pregnant women, I think, at the time, they all had abortions immediately and they ended up being sterile because whatever was injected into them went straight to their ovaries, caused mass inflammation and sterilised them. That was admitted to.
Well, that's the music coming in; so, from the snowy North of Ontario, Canada, from Hamish and myself, it's goodnight and may your god, or your gods, go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Links to the topics covered
in tonight’s show:
welcomes EU climate deal, says US must do more" AFP (google.com) - Dec.
"London Times: Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus" by Pearce Wright, Science Editor (at associatedcontent.com) - May 11, 1987.
VIDEO: "Indian farmers find a use for Corporate Cola" (brasschecktv.com).
"CSE releases new study on pesticides in soft drinks" Centre for Science and Environment (cseindia.org).