"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
Live on RBN (#211)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Dec. 9, 2008:
Foundation-New Tower of Total World Power:
"The New World System
is Based on Fear,
Suddenly Everything's Fearful, So I Hear,
Socio-Economics Based on Warming,
'Contrary Facts Heretical,' is Their Warning,
Recently Parents Would Say 'Don't be Daft,'
If You Said Their Children would be CAFed,
Interrogated by Anyone in Authority,
Delving in Areas Where They Ought Not to Be,
Elite Claim Public Cause All Pollution,
Eradication of Most of Them is Solution,
In the Meantime, Monitor Each Thought and Action,
And Train Them to Accept Breeding Reduction,
Words of Culture, Christianity, Land--Eliminate,
Reduced into Concrete, No Country, World State,
The Perfect World Tyranny is Birthed into Being,
An Old Mystery Religion with Eye All-Seeing"
© Alan Watt Dec. 9, 2008
Tuesday 9th December 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Dec. 9, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 9th of December 2008. Newcomers who have just tuned in for the first time, look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on the website there you'll find lots of talks I've given over the years where I try to give you the short cuts to understanding the reality, the big picture of that which controls your lives and I show you how it's planned, where they're taking you - and why - and, I give you the networking of big Foundations and NGOs that are all strung together, working together, coordinated together, the “thousand points of light”, as Mr. Bush Senior called it, and, at the basis of it all, is a sort of eugenics. It's also a form of social engineering. We're always being engineered and re-engineered, mentally, to fit in with the up-coming new type of society, pretty well in every era and these guys have been at this for an awful, awful long time. They took their models from previous religions and how they worked and how they gave a particular reality to different people; and, they utilised them. So much so, in fact, they have no shame in borrowing what used to be hymns, the melodies for hymns, now in schools in the US, because they have Green Parties associated with schools in the United States of America and other countries too, they're actually having the children sing hymns basically to the world, to the planet, to the greening of the planet, using old Christian melodies. They're shameless in their techniques but why would they possibly look over that aspect of it? They must always create a new religion for a new era; and; it's said in ancient times, even in Greece, when the old Gods die off, when the age passes, there's always a new God comes in. If you want to control the new era, the next million years, as Charles Galton Darwin called his book, you must create the new God and control society. That is well underway today.
This takes me on to people who donate to me: I do thank them very, very much, it's generally the same people over and over and I do tell people who listen to the show, that I'm brought to you, by yourselves, at least the ones who help out. You can either donate directly; you'll find on my website a button you can push to send money through ‘PayPal’ or you can order my books, CDs and DVDs. That's what funds me; I don't get money from advertising, I don't ask for money from the stations I'm on and, I never have. That way I can not be compromised as doing a business basically. This is not a business, this is not fun, what I do is essential, it's necessary. And, when I think it's not necessary any more, or it's too late or whatever, I'll just go off and teach private groups, where I can teach at length into the deeper understandings of this very-very old world and what runs it; and how to counter, at least counter, sometimes deflect it, from its course. It has been done, in times gone by, but not for a long time; and, with the totalitarian measures of the system today, it’s almost impossible to do it. In fact, there'll be massive bloodshed before the elite will ever change the ridiculous indoctrinations they've pushed on us like 'global warming'. It's a must-be scenario, this whole CO2 farce and they will, they'd rather kill most of us off brutally, than ever back down and admit it was a con to control the whole world and everyone in it. I'll be back with more, after the following messages.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix.
Social Engineering: how you plan what kind of society you want in 20-30-40-50 years, in fact, 100 years and you plan the indoctrination process, from kindergarten, with every intake and every year's intake, year by year, you upgrade them to what they'll hit or experience when they get to 30 or 40, or whatever. What they'll accept, what you train them to accept. Beria talked about it, in the Soviet Union, in the 1930s; and, it's in practice today. We also find the educational systems have their champions given to them too and I've mentioned before there are good books out there with the history of education. Gatto is probably one of the better authors of the histories, and he gives you that which is behind it, the big Foundations again, with the kind of societies they wanted, the kind of behaviour they wanted in society as well. We find men like John Dewey, a big player in the Americas, because he came up with, at least he was trained to come up with, because his tutor, I think it was Manning or Manley and he was well trained, well coached for his role and they do give them roles, they train them years in advance before the public ever have them presented to them. John Dewey talked about altering history altogether eventually and dropping all history where there was any conflict mentioned between any peoples. They’d eradicate it simply, simple as that. It doesn't stop at history because, see, words were also discussed, because words, after all, are how we communicate to each other. George Orwell went through that process, in his book 1984, where he called it linguistic minimalism. Every dictionary edition they'd make it thinner and thinner, as they’d withdraw words; and, when people don't have the vocabulary to express thoughts, very important thoughts, then there'll be no terrorism anywhere, it would be impossible to communicate ideas. That was called peace and safety.
You eradicate history and you eradicate words. Like Christianity, it is true, was used long enough, to control the world on behalf of a ruling elite. They used the Catholic Church and then, of course, the Protestant Church was created, for an industrial era. They wanted a good working type of system to come in for the industrialists and for the goods. The good man who would save his pennies and become successful as they say. Another part of their long-term agenda. Christianity was used down through the ages and definitely Protestantism was heavily-influenced and infiltrated, and actually run by Freemasonry, for an awful long time. Special sects were sprung up out of Freemasonry and Pike himself advised some of his top men to infiltrate and dominate Christian sects, especially in the United States of America. The idea was to gradually change the whole concept of Christianity and blend it in with the world system. You do away with evil because, remember, in the Masonic tradition, in the Cabbalistic tradition, there is no such thing as good or evil, there is only outcome. The judgement of humans is what you bring down to, or you classify as good or bad / good or evil; but in the long run, it’s irrelevant to nature you see; someone or something always benefits, in the end. Many Christian sects in fact were founded by Freemasons. There's one in Pennsylvania, I believe, who founded one of the great US sects. It's a pain to a lot of people, because they go round doors and keep knocking on them and he's under a pyramid with 666 written on the side of it, because he was a top Freemason. You look at the top Freemasons or the top 200 Freemasons that were published in the Masonic publication The Top 200 Freemasons of America and even the ones who brought in Lutherism to the United States, were 32nd and 33rd degree Freemasons.
Christianity had to be destroyed because it claimed it had exclusive truth; and, in the system that's here today, you must deny you have the exclusive truth on anything, to be accepted. If you claim you have exclusive truth, you'll be under heavy attack by all Press and media and even in the movie industry, they'll make sure that they flatten you; they'll make you ridiculous because you're Fundamental. Meanwhile they're bringing in the most fundamentalist religion of all: the oneness doctrine, the greening doctrine, the environmental doctrine; the mental part of enviro is what says it all.
Here's from the Telegraph, something that goes along these lines of removing words and history, because you must remove the words, to remove the history from the books. The Telegraph and this is from the 8th of December 2008 by Julie Henry, Education Correspondent:
Words associated with Christianity and British history taken out of children's dictionary.
Westminster Abbey may be one of Britain's most famous landmarks, but the word abbey has been removed from the Oxford Junior Dictionary.
It says what they’ve replaced it with is things like:
Creative Zen mp3 player, Words associated with Christianity and British history taken out of the children’s dictionary. Instead such words as mp3 player, voicemail and attachments have been included. Oxford University Press has removed words like "aisle", "bishop", "chapel", "empire" and "monarch" from its Junior Dictionary and replaced them with words like "blog", "broadband" and "celebrity".
You see, it's more important we follow the celebrities because it's part of culture creation; and, we ‘monkey’, we ape what we see.
Dozens of words related to the countryside
This is an interesting part:
words related to the countryside have also been culled out of the dictionary.
Why would they take words out to do with the countryside out of the dictionary? Because we know the whole agenda is to get us into compact cities and have us in these completely artificial environments where we're easily controlled. People in the rural areas, down through time, regardless of the kind of land you're born on, you will tend to fight and die for the land, you love the land, it’s part of you. It's part of your history, your tradition, your people, your family and so on. And, that must be completely destroyed, for this new system that is to be brought in. So, words from the countryside have been culled out of it.
The publisher claims the changes have been made to reflect the fact that Britain is a modern, multicultural, multi-faith society. But academics and head teachers said that the changes to the 10,000 word Junior Dictionary could mean that children lose touch with Britain's heritage. "We have a certain Christian narrative which has given meaning to us over the last 2,000 years. To say it is all relative and replaceable is questionable," said Professor Alan Smithers, the director of the centre for education and employment at Buckingham University. "The word selections are a very interesting reflection of the way childhood is going, moving away from our spiritual background and the natural world and towards the world that information technology creates for us."
Creates for us.
An analysis of the word choices made by the dictionary lexicographers has revealed that entries from "abbey" to " willow" have been axed. Instead, words such as "MP3 player", "voicemail" and "attachment" have taken their place. Lisa Saunders, a worried mother who has painstakingly compared entries from the junior dictionaries, aimed at children aged seven or over, dating from 1978, 1995, 2000, 2002, 2003 and 2007, said she was "horrified" by the vast number of words that have been removed, most since 2003.
You see how it's all planned that way? Incrementally; and, it's true enough, most folk won't notice, they won't notice, they won't know that someone's planning this.
"The Christian faith still has a strong following," she said. "To eradicate so many words associated with the Christianity will have a big effect on the numerous primary schools who use it." Ms Saunders realised words were being removed when she was helping her son with his homework and discovered that "moss" and "fern", which were in editions up until 2003, were no longer listed. "I decide to take a closer look and compare the new version to the other editions," said the mother of four from Co Down, Northern Ireland. "I was completely horrified by the vast number of words which have been removed. We know that language moves on and we can't be fuddy-duddy about it but you don't cull hundreds of important words in order to get in a different set of ICT words."
Anthony Seldon, the master of Wellington College, a leading private school in Berkshire, said: "I am stunned that words like "saint", "buttercup", "heather" and "sycamore" have all gone and I grieve it. "I think as well as being descriptive, the Oxford Junior Dictionary, has to be prescriptive too, suggesting not just words that are used but words that should be used. It has a duty to keep these words within usage, not merely pander to an audience. We are looking at the loss of words of great beauty. I would rather have "marzipan" and "mistletoe" then "MP3 player." Oxford University Press, which produces the junior edition, selects words with the aid of the Children's Corpus, a list of about 50 million words made up of general language, words from children's books and terms related to the school curriculum. Lexicographers consider word frequency when making additions and deletions.
Vineeta Gupta, the head of children's dictionaries at Oxford University Press, said:
"We are limited by how big the dictionary can be, little hands must be able to handle it
This is their excuse.
but we produce 17 children's dictionaries with different selections and numbers of words.
Back to John Dewey, what did he say? We've got to replace history. How you do it? You replace the words and delete words. I'll be back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi Folks, Alan Watt, Cutting Through The Matrix and showing you what's happening today and showing you, again, how it was planned long, long time ago. You have to read the old books and you find that nothing's happening today that wasn't planned long ago. You've got to jump past this incredulity that you have and study and then it all makes sense. Life is planned, generations are planned, the culture for each generation is planned, in advance. You'll find that Oxford University, look at the history of it, go into it. Go in to what they call the River that flows through it. They call it Isis, Oxford on the Isis. What's an Ox? It's a bull, it's Taurus, it goes over, Taurus over Isis, basically. So much has come out of it and we know that the Council on Foreign Relations or the Royal Institute for International Affairs has been heavily involved with that university and Cambridge for an awful long time. They helped to lead the world's cultures. Monty Python's Team came out of Oxford. The reason they could write so much stuff and one of them even went on to do movies like Brazil, about the future and the type of system, in a comical fashion, was because they went to Oxford, that's why; they knew what was up. That's where the Rhodes Scholars go as well. That's where All Souls College is, where the very-very high members, who are chosen to go on and beyond the Rhodes Scholarships, the Lifers go, there's few of them get to that very elite position and the ones that do are truly world leaders, behind the scenes. Real world leaders, the ones with the real power that are unelected, they're the technocrats.
Here's an article here, I was talking about the climate you see and no matter what evidence comes forward to prove it's all a hoax, they'd rather kill us all off in the most bloody fashion than ever admit it. Because this is a must-be, this whole CO2 global warming, climate change stuff is to replace other types of wars between nations, to rule the public on an individual level, world-wide. It's also the greatest tax system ever devised. All from this global elite who've used religions in the past, who are creating this religion, they have created this religion; and, they will tolerate no dissension from this, nothing will stop it, because it's a must-be. It says:
Beware the church of climate change [alarm]
This is from the Sydney Morning Herald, from Australia [Miranda Devine] November 27, 2008
As the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, an economist, anti-totalitarian and climate change sceptic, prepares to take up the rotating presidency of the European Union next year, climate alarmists are doing their best to traduce him. The New York Times opened a profile of Klaus, 67, this week with a quote from a 1980s communist secret agent's report, claiming he behaves like a "rejected genius",
In other words, they're trying to defame him already.
and asserts there is "palpable fear" he will "embarrass" the EU. But the real fear driving climate alarmists wild is that a more rational approach to the fundamentalist religion of global warming may be in the ascendancy - whether in the parliamentary offices of the world's largest trading bloc or in the living rooms of Blacktown.
As the global financial crisis takes hold, perhaps people are starting to wonder whether the so-called precautionary principle, which would have us accept enormous new taxes in the guise of an emissions trading scheme and curtail economic growth, is justified, based on what we actually know about climate. One of Australia's leading Enviro-sceptics, the geologist and University of Adelaide professor Ian Plimer, 62, says he has noticed audiences becoming more receptive to his message that climate change has always occurred and there is nothing we can do to stop it.
It's like the weather, right, can you stop the weather?
In a speech at the American Club in Sydney on Monday night for Quadrant magazine, titled Human-Induced Climate Change - A Lot Of Hot Air, Plimer debunked climate-change myths.
"Climates always change," he said. Our climate has changed in cycles over millions of years, as the orbit of the planet wobbles and our distance from the sun changes, for instance, or as the sun itself produces variable amounts of radiation. "All of this affects climate. It is impossible to stop climate change. Climates have always changed and they always will."
That's why they picked climate change, you see, this guy still doesn't get it obviously. That's why they chose climate change. It's like religion, it's a belief system.
His two-hour presentation included more than 50 charts and graphs, as well as almost 40 pages of references. It is the basis of his new book, Heaven And Earth: The Missing Science Of Global Warming, to be published early next year.
Plimer said one of the charts, which plots atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature over 500 million years, with seemingly little correlation, demonstrates one of the "lessons from history" to which geologists are privy: "There is no relationship between CO2 and temperature."
Another slide charts the alternating periods of cooling and warming on Earth, with the Pleistocene Ice Age starting 110,000 years ago and giving way, 14,700 years ago, to the Bolling warm period for 800 years. This in turn gave way to the Older Dryas cooling for 300 years, then the Allerod warming for 700 years, and so on, until the cooling of the Little Ice Age from 1300 to 1850.
I'll be back with more to complete this, after these messages.
=== BREAK ===
Alan Watt, back again, Cutting Through The Matrix and reading an article from the Sydney Morning Herald, from someone who knows his stuff and is qualified. However, as I said before, it probably won't make any difference because this is a must be. They prepared this for a long, long time, this greening and the control of the earth and the world and everyone in it, through this particular agenda; and, they'll never back down. To continue what this man is saying, he says:
This in turn gave way to the Older Dryas cooling for 300 years, then the Allerod warming for 700 years, and so on, until the cooling of the Little Ice Age from 1300 to 1850. Since 1850, we have lived through the "Modern Warming", one of the most stable climate periods in history.
Then, on page 2, he goes on:
Plimer said some astronomers predict we are headed for a new cooling period.
Plimer said there is a division between those scientists who sit in front of super computers and push piles of data into the mathematical models that drive the theory of climate change, and those who take measurements in the field.
Now, he's made that very important comment here, or statement: you see, they build special computers to give them the answers they want. Check it out for yourself. Every article they come out with, they've always said 'with this new computer' they've found 'this', then they can scare the hell out of us. That's how they do it, they get the answers they want. He says:
We are not sceptical enough about the data. For instance, Plimer cited differences between results from temperature measuring stations in urban and rural areas. Those in urbanised Chicago, Berkeley, New York, and so on, show temperature rises over the past 150 years, whereas those in the rural US, in Houlton, Albany and Harrisburg (though not Death Valley, California) show equally consistent cooling.
I'll tell you why that is: you see, 150 years ago, they had these little temperature sensing stations over grass fields and the earth absorbs the heat you see. Anyone who lives in the city in the summer is living in a basking of reflected heat from concrete all around you and on the ground; and, that's never taken into the equation. If they had a bunch of Chinese woks, all reflecting the sun to a temperature gauge, you know what kind of reading you're going to get. Well, that's what happens in the cities. Now the guys at the top know this con as well because they know the histories and where they put these particular stations. They know what the environment was like around those stations when they first put them up 150 years ago. Now, the cities are built up over them, they're surrounded in concrete. He says here:
To understand the chaotic nature of climate change, we need to consider all the inputs - cosmic radiation, sun, clouds and so on,
I'll add global spraying as well, by this big air force that no one takes claim of.
There was much more but essentially Plimer's message is that the idea humans cause climate change has become a fundamentalist religion which is corrupting science.
Again, I'll say it for the hard of thinking:
but essentially Plimer's message is that the idea humans cause climate change has become a fundamentalist religion which is corrupting science.
You bet it is, because it's meant to be a fundamentalist religion.
It is embedded with a fear of nature and embraced principally by city people who have lost touch with nature.
Ain't that the truth?
He likens the debate to the famous 1990s battle he had in the Federal Court, where he accused an elder of The Hills Bible Church in Baulkham Hills of breaching Australia's Trade Practices Act by claiming to have found scientific evidence of Noah's Ark in Turkey. Plimer says creationists and climate alarmists are quite similar in that "we're dealing with dogma and people who, when challenged, become quite vicious and irrational".
Well, that's what I said already, that's the mental part of environmental, you see.
Human-caused climate change is being "promoted with religious zeal there are fundamentalist organisations
You bet, I've mentioned lots of them, they're the big Foundations at the top.
which will do anything to silence critics. They have their holy books, their prophet [is] Al Gore.
What is Al Gore? What's his history? What's his expertise by the way? Apart from the fact that Armand Hammer picked him and trained him. Look into his particular history as well.
And they are promoting a story which is frightening us witless [using] guilt [and urging] penance."
By the way, Armand Hammer means arm and hammer. His father changed the name, because he loved the Soviet System so much. Armand Hammer also had an apartment next to Lenin and then Stalin and was still a citizen of the US, forging a big powerful, wealthy organisation. Foundations again eh? He says:
It is difficult for non-scientists to engage in the debate over what causes climate change and whether or not it can be stopped by new taxes and slower growth, because dissenting voices are shouted down by true believers in the scientific community
I wouldn't say they are true believers, I believe they are absolute prostitutes, who are so well paid by these big Foundations and the United Nations and so on that they know where their bread is buttered. To be honest, that is my personal opinion. He says these:
true believers in the scientific community who claim they alone have the authority to speak. Quadrant is under fire for publishing articles by sceptics but, as its editor, Keith Windschuttle, said on Monday night, "People who are really confident [of their facts] relish debate." In any case, ordinary people already have suspicions. The zealotry and one-sidedness of the debate alarmed an 81-year-old Seven Hills pensioner, Denys Clarke, so much that last month, at his own expense, he hired the ballroom at the Blacktown Workers Club for two public forums, titled The Truth About Climate Change. He invited a climate sceptic, the James Cook University professor Bob Carter, a geologist, to speak. More than 300 people attended, some from as far away as Nowra.
Carter, like Plimer and Klaus, has come in for his fair share of vilification. But as Clarke proves, you can't stop people thinking.
and then he finishes it with
He's got that on the bottom, because, they will, this is going to be verboten shortly, to go - I'm not kidding, the system we're in is the most totalitarian, politically-correct system, which is run from the top down. It's going to be impossible to view any personal opinion about anything at all, unless it's politically-correct, by law, by absolute law. That's how far it's gone; we're in big, big trouble, big trouble. This is the most, I've said before you think that previous religions were bad, with what they did and their hold over the minds of society, of people in society. This scientific foundation-run system is going to be the worst, most merciless system you could ever ever possibly envisage.
This article here, before I go to callers, is from the Mail online:
Has your child been CAFed? How the Government plans to record intimate information on every child in Britain
By Eileen Fairweather, December 7th 2008. It says:
When police raided Tory MP Damian Green’s home, they ‘sheepishly’ asked whether children were present before ransacking it. His wife assumed they were being polite. But, under sinister new guidelines,
Sinister, remember, that's still in the dictionary, I think.
officers must assess all children they encounter including while ‘searching premises’ for a police database called MERLIN.
Merlin, the magician
This, in turn, feeds into a giant new Whitehall database on Britain’s children, Contact Point, which goes live nationally in January. The Tories [Conservatives] have vowed to scrap it,
which they won't of course.
arguing that it threatens family privacy and children’s safety. But civil liberties campaigners say we must resist it now, before it is too late.
You bet it. It says:
Since April 1, hundreds of thousands of State employees, from police to teachers, youth and nursery workers, social workers and sports coaches, have been entitled to interrogate children aged up to 19, using the ‘Common Assessment Framework’ (CAF), a creepy, eight-page, 60-section questionnaire. CAF includes eye-wateringly intimate questions about children’s sexual behaviour, their family’s structure, culture and religion, their views on ‘discrimination’, their friends, secret fears, feelings and family income, plus ‘any serious difficulties in their parents’ relationship’.
Do you understand what I'm saying here about this totalitarian world system? It's here, already. It's overwhelming, it's into every facet of every individual’s life and, meanwhile, the media keeps us happy and entertained, with sex and violence. Generally, in a series or movies to do with them keeping us all safe. Lots of sex and violence in those movies, the hooks, while they indoctrinate us. Meanwhile, they're interrogating children about all the adults and there's no hue and cry from the people who are so dumbed down, they can't think for themselves anymore. All they can do is parrot their political correct slogans to each other. This article says:
How has such a terrifying intrusion into private life crept
Now, remember, this is also everywhere else. Britain's doing it, it's all over Europe and it's all over Canada and the Commonwealth countries and - no doubt - it's already underway in the US as well. See, we're global already and they're sharing the same computer databases.
How has such a terrifying intrusion into private life crept, almost unnoticed, under the radar? The answer is New Labour
This is the left-wing, supposedly; there's no left or right wing.
has cleverly packaged CAF as an aid to ‘child protection’ and delivering better services as part of its Every Child Matters project (ECM).
Remember 'No child left behind' and all this stuff, Al Gore and all that. You see, it's all tied together and there's always a lot more to what they put forward than what you think. This costs £224 million, from a destitute bankrupt country. This programme £224 million. You can double that for dollars.
has been beset by delays, incomprehensible acronyms and New Labour gobbledegook. But let us not be deceived – it is about control, not care, and spying, not safety.
ECM claims that nearly half of Britain’s 11million children have ‘additional needs’, so must continuously be assessed for the giant database at the Government’s Department for Schools and Families.
That takes me right back to Bush, in the US, who wants all children to be psychologically evaluated every year and eventually to creep up onto adults as well, bringing you in to see if you're politically-correct. It's really to see if you're a thinker. If you're a thinker and you're answering the questions alarms will go off all over the place. Sealed doors will come down and you're trapped: 'we've got one, he's a thinker'. You think I'm kidding? What was it Mao Tse-tung said? He says I wasn't afraid of anything, except “someone with an idea”.
CAF questionnaires will be kept until they are 19, or for 75 years
Ha ha ha
if they have been in care, and can be accessed electronically by hundreds of thousands of staff in other agencies.
Cradle to grave eh? The Communist Manifesto, the Albert Pike Manifesto, all the same you know, they're all the same manifestos. The Council on Foreign Relations Manifesto, same manifesto; The Royal Institute for International Affairs, the same manifesto; the United Nations organisation, same manifesto. It must all be coincidence eh? It says:
Contact Point will also store information from databases kept by the National Health Service, General Practitioners, schools, the Child Benefit Agency and the National Pupil Register. The potential for sensitive material about our children falling into malevolent hands is enormous.
Well, of course it is, it's in the hands of schoolteachers and people, have you seen the people who work in those places today?
Incredibly, parental consent is not often required for this intrusion into children’s lives. Youngsters from the age of 12
Twelve years old.
are deemed mature enough to agree to being CAF-ed whatever their parents’ objections. But campaigners stress that families should teach their children to say No: submitting to CAF is, currently at least, voluntary.
It's not really, when children see policemen and they start to be questioned, they generally start spilling and telling them what - they think any adult has authority, you see, especially in uniform. They're already trained that authorities have more, are more important than their parents, people out of uniform.
The Government claims that the database will identify children at risk of poverty, abuse or future
That was part of how they rammed it through. They can tell, you see, through the psychological associations etc who might be a criminal. They might measure your eyeball to your earlobe, like they used to do when they were trying it that way then. Or, your eyes too close together.
But since when did filling in endless forms release funds for frontline services, rather than divert them? By bizarre coincidence or not this assault on treasured British notions of privacy and propriety was devised by the woman responsible for Britain’s most notorious social-work scandal. ECM was launched in September 2003 by Margaret Hodge, Tony Blair’s shocking choice as Britain’s first Children’s Minister.
Why are we surprised? I'm not surprised at all. Look at Cameron: Cameron who was in charge of MK-ULTRA in sweet old lovely, pristine snow Canada. Look at his history, as he shocked and used LSD on people and children as well, by the way, they forget to admit that in their little movies and documentaries they do on him. All to eradicate previous memories and make compliant robots out of people; and it was funded by the CIA and validated and accepted and given the go-ahead by the government of Canada. It went on for years, on for years and what happened to Cameron after that? He went to the United Nations, as the head of Children’s Psychiatry, for the whole world and UNICEF; and we're shocked? I'm not shocked; I know what these guys are up to: they want a programmable society. After all, after Darwin, all humans fell of their perches, down to the ground and became just animals, which can be conditioned and trained and beaten and lambasted into submission and then reprogrammed into the 'proper' way of thinking. That's the reality of it.
Now, we'll go to the phones now. We've got Cody in Oregon. Are you there Cody?
Cody: Yeah, I'm here Alan, thanks for having me on your show.
Alan: Yes, hello, here's the music, so hold on and I'll get you when I come right back, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, Alan Watt here, Cutting Through The Matrix and we've got Cody from Oregon on the line. Hello Cody.
Cody: Yeah, hi Alan.
Alan: Yes, go ahead.
Hey, I ran into a Mason at a bookstore the other day. You know I was in the bookstore and I was looking for a few of the books that you recommended actually and it's a big bookstore and they have a whole Masons section actually; and I was in there with my wife and looking for Morals and Dogma and somebody overheard me looking for that and he popped around the corner and he starts bragging about all the different books that he knew in that section and he turned out to be a Mason you know, from what he was saying and everything. I talked to him for a long time and it was pretty interesting and I finally asked him: “what is this all about?” and he said it was about “memory”, because they're all - I was just curious what you had to say about it. What do they mean by 'memory'?
Alan: In different levels, he'd recognise that you weren't a mason because he'd give you a few words in the conversation and if you didn't pick up on them, he would know that you're not. And Memory is: you have different levels of memory, according to Freemasonry itself. What it's also: the high Mason's memory of his task in life, what he was sent here for. They often give the old story of Hiram being sent here and you'll find that Manley P Hall wrote about it too, they give this story of how he came through the universe, basically, was tossed here in this primitive place, the man of order etc etc, to build the foundation, the structure. They always start with foundations. It would take me hours to explain it all to you and I can't do it at this point.
Cody: Right, you know he said he could be given a speech and not even be thinking about a speech the way he could memorise it. He could memorise pages at a time with these tricks he learned, his powers from being a Mason basically. You know and he also recommended, well he didn't really recommend it, he was talking about one of these different books and he kind of said "This book kind of explains going through Masonry” and it was a book called Turning The Hiram Key and I actually ended up buying that one, I haven't got to reading it yet. Are you familiar with that book?
Alan: Yes; but, I'll tell you, you won't find the higher meanings in those books.
Cody: It's just like the boring going through the rituals.
Alan: Even the low Masons, it's enough to fascinate you and keep you titillated for a long time but it won't give you the higher meanings there. They don't tell the higher meanings to the public. You'll get hints and intonations of the eugenics all through them, if you're very careful and you see and read between the lines, but what they're really advising is good breeding and selective breeding, that's all through their literature.
Cody: It was really interesting, it seemed like he was kind of trying to like recruit or something. You know the way he was, oh ‘our Lodge needs some members and this and that’, it was really weird. The other thing I noticed was that it looked like he was wearing the same boots that I see the cops wear around the town. Not a lot of people have those boots, it was pretty interesting.
Alan: Well, if you're a Mason you can always get a pair, don't worry! Ha ha.
Cody: Oh, ok! [Laughter]. Hey, well thanks a lot Alan, I appreciate it.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
Cody: Alright, bye.
I've got some photographs of one of the biggest Lodges. It's the main Lodge in New York and it's floor after floor of these grand rooms; and, I'll try and find it and put the link up on my site. You'd be astonished at the finances that these characters have; but, everybody who's anybody in New York in the running of New York and all its facets, including education, police and so on, is a member and they go from all over the city, to attend this particular one big Lodge.
I'll be back tomorrow with more; but, for tonight, from Hamish and myself in Ontario Canada, it's goodnight and may your god, or gods, go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Links to the topics covered in tonight’s show:
associated with Christianity and British history taken out of children's
dictionary" by Julie Henry (telegraph.co.uk) - Dec. 8, 2008.
"Beware the church of climate alarm" by Miranda Devine (smh.com.au) - Nov. 27, 2008.
"Has your child been CAFed? How the Government plans to record intimate information on every child in Britain" by Eileen Fairweather (dailymail.co.uk) - Dec. 7, 2008.
Take a Grand Tour of this Charitable Brotherhood's Masonic Building in NYC [Click Play Button].