Sept. 26, 2008 (#172)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 26, 2008:
Unveiled by the U.S. Army,
90-Page Army Modernization Strategy,
Which Foresees War on Burgeoning Youth,
Demanding Rights Idealistically so Uncouth,
A New Target Enemy of Operations,
Soldiers Deployed Amidst Whole Populations,
New Kinds of War, They Have Said So,
True to Ordo Ab Chao, Hang on, Here We Go"
© Alan Watt Sept. 26, 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 26, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on Friday the 26th of September, 2008. Newcomers look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site where you can download as many of the talks I’ve given in the past as you can possibly want. There’s a big, big wish list there of information. Remember that there are no other sites out there where I authorize my books to be sold. It’s on www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com so look it up. Also look in to www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download and print up in the various languages of Europe.
Talking about the web site, I spend TIME here chasing down people who sell my books unabashedly, unashamedly and rake in the cash that keeps me going here. They cut it from underneath my feet. They take the bread out of your mouth. I just found another one that goes under the 9/11 Truth Movement where he’s selling my books. This guy’s selling my books so Alfonso if you’re listening down in Toledo, Ohio and I’ve got the photographs of your homes, by the way, you’ll know what to do. You’d better get them pulled very quickly and reimburse the loot that you’ve stolen from me. Okay?
Now, everyone’s getting rushed and worried about this big banking crisis but this had to come. It’s planned to come. They don’t make mistakes at the top. This goes back to something that was said by Senator Barry Goldwater in 1979 talking about the Trilateral Commission. Now, the Trilateral Commission is an ARM, a big arm, a more powerful arm, a more specialized arm of the Council on Foreign Relations. He said, “The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multi-national consolidation of the commercial and banking interests BY seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power, political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical, with no apologies.” That was Barry Goldwater in 1979.
What you’re seeing today is just the big machine in action as the people get screwed again by the robber barons. Nothing new in that at all. Read your history about the robber barons back in the 1800s and how the big boys and Morgan and Gould and all the rest of them literally looted the United States with all their pension funds THREE TIMES IN A ROW. Three depressions in a row. That’s before the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s. It’s a common theme with them. They build up stuff and then they just simply LOOT the country.
That gets me back to the people who do print my books up and sell them. See, psychopaths are psychopaths in all classes of society. It doesn’t matter if it’s the guy on the street, the con man, little fast-Jack type, who sees the angle in everything he see around him, every opportunity. Even the ones that are disasters. He SEES, like a shark going in to blood, he smells blood, he sees where he can get a profit made. He has no qualms because he doesn’t have empathy or emotion or compassion. The only difference between the guy on the street doing that or the guy stealing my stuff and printing it up, the only difference between him and the banker is that the banker is born into a more powerful, well-established family of psychopaths. So the problem isn’t just at the top. It goes all the way down to the bottom and it’s all throughout society… encouraged too, by today’s culture creation industry. I’ll be back with more after this following break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. On my web site in the archives section you’ll find links to the Department of Defence’s think tank for the UK. This is also the think tank for the NATO countries and they put out 90 pages of what they could foresee coming in the next 30-40 years with escalating riots and all of this stuff and how the military will be used ON the population. Well, the US has now come out with the same report basically. They’ve tidied it up a bit for the American public… not to scare them. They make you think that this is all for wars abroad. They do mention it’s for a youth, a youth society, that will be growing up in the future… with very unruly, unhappy youth. They’re talking about males really. This all ties in again with the depopulation agenda. There’s no doubt whatsoever. This came from the Irish Times.
US generals planning for resource wars
Monday, September 22, 2008
[emphasis added to article]
(Alan: This is how they’ve titled it here. It’s better camouflage. See, in Britain, they don’t bother camouflaging anything because the public are so beaten down with the scientific technique of propaganda and bureaucracies - there’s just bureaucracies for everything, constantly announcing things on the radio and television - that you’re made to be apathetic. That’s again, what Bertrand Russell said. ‘We shall create an apathetic society.’ Apathy is a very good tool to use in psychological warfare. But in the US because they have better script writers who work in Hollywood and so on and they do work with these guys and they work too with Madison Avenue to MARKET the ideas to the public, they get better write-ups, more camouflaged. But it says here…)
ANALYSIS: The US military sees the next 30 to 40 years as involving a state of continuous war against ideologically-motivated terrorists (A: Now, that’s a loaded term there because ideology can be anything at all. Having rights and freedom could be an ideology, you see. And it is an idea. Terrorism is now expanding to include even VERBAL terrorists. Speaking out can be terrorism. Definitely speaking out against the wars in the Middle-East has already been stated by Bush himself, that it is a form of terrorism.) and competing with Russia and China for natural resources and markets, writes Tom Clonan.
AS GENERAL Ray Odierno takes command of US forces in Baghdad from troop surge architect Gen David Petraeus, America has begun planning in earnest for its phased withdrawal. (A: Now, that ties right in with the troops being brought back home - the article I read last week - and how they’re deploying them to work alongside the police. Well, what do you think that’s all about? You’re watching the banks all go down, at the right times, mind you. They bring them home first and then collapse the banks. Everything is working to plan and schedule. Everything that happens on a major scale is done by plan an it’s always on schedule.)
The extra brigade combat teams - or battlegroups - deployed to Iraq by Petraeus have already withdrawn and a further 8,000 troops have been diverted to Afghanistan. (A: They have to protect the poppy harvest, you see.)
In January, the next president of the United States will conclude America's timetable for withdrawal in final negotiations with the Iraqi government.
(A: Then it goes on and down the actual page itself and you try to find what they’re really, really getting in to with the 90 page document and there’s also a PDF you can get with the whole thing on it, much deeper scope, more open about it too, rather than this handout they give to the media.)
Under the auspices of the US department of defence and department of the army, the US military have just published a document entitled (A: This is the PDF you get.) 2008 Army Modernization Strategy which makes for interesting reading against the current backdrop of deteriorating international fiscal, environmental, energy resource and security crises.
The 2008 modernisation strategy, written by Lieut Gen Stephen Speakes (A: How do they dream these guys’ names up? He‘s a speaker and he drafts up this thing.), deputy chief of staff of the US army, contains the first explicit and official acknowledgement that the US military is dangerously overstretched internationally. (A: Well, no kidding. They’ve been policing the world, all over the word, quietly from the general public that is, since World War II.) It states simply: "The army is engaged in the third-longest war in our nation's history and . . . the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) has caused the army to become out of balance with the demand for forces exceeding the sustainable supply."
Against this backdrop, the 90 page document sets out the future of international conflict for the next 30 to 40 years - as the US military sees it - and outlines the manner in which the military will sustain its current operations and prepare and "transform" itself for future "persistent" warfare. (A: Persistent warfare, ongoing warfare. Remember that phrase you heard at the beginning, right after 9/11 in 2001? ‘This is to be a hundred years war.’)
The document reveals a number of profoundly significant - and worrying - strategic positions (A: And I’ll try and cut to the chase here through all this nonsense actually. That’s just a lot of filler that they put in there.) that have been adopted as official doctrine by the US military. In its preamble, it predicts a post cold war future of "perpetual warfare".
According to its authors: "We have entered an era of persistent conflict . . . a security environment much more ambiguous and unpredictable than that faced during the cold war." (A: Which, again, was a farce.)
It then goes on to describe the key features of this dawning era (A: Dawning era. Masons love dawns, new dawns…) of continuous warfare. Some of the characteristics are familiar enough to a world audience accustomed to the rhetoric of the global war on terror.
"A key current threat is a radical, ideology-based, long-term terrorist threat bent on using any means available - to include weapons of mass destruction (A: Boy, you get bored hearing that one) - to achieve its political and ideological ends."
Relatively new, "emerging" features are also included in the document's rationale for future threats.
"We face a potential return to traditional security threats posed by emerging near-peers as we compete globally for depleting natural resources and overseas markets."
This thinly-veiled reference to Russia and China will, perhaps, come as little surprise given recent events in Ossetia and Abkhazia. The explicit reference in this context to future resource wars, however, will probably raise eyebrows among the international diplomatic community, who prefer to couch such conflicts as human rights-based or rooted in notions around freedom and democracy. (A: I like how they worded that. Which is very true. NOTIONS about freedom and democracy.)
The document, however, contains no such lofty pretences. (A: Their main enemy, it says here, for the US, the main enemy… Remember what Kissinger said back in the 70s, ‘The main enemy of the state’ and it’s parroted here, is ‘population growth’.) It goes on to list as a pre-eminent threat to the security of the US and its allies "population growth - especially (A: not conclusively) in less-developed countries - [which] will expose a resulting 'youth bulge'." (A: A youth bulge is what they’re calling their target.)
This youth bulge, the document goes on to state, will present the US with further "resource competition" in that these expanding populations in the developing world "will consume ever increasing amounts of food, water and energy".
The document goes on to describe in broad-strokes the manner in which its downsized military might ensure survival of the fittest for the US and its allies in future resource wars for water, food and energy.
As a consequence of identifying growing populations in the developed world as a threat in itself, the strategy document highlights a number of paradigm shifts in the way future wars are to be conducted.
(A: Now here is one of the main parts…)
It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Do you realize what that means? This is TOTAL WAR. Total war means that the population are really the target. In World War II, Dowding who was in charge of the Royal Air Force for Britain, targeted most of the bombing in Germany ON THE WORKERS’ HOMES. That’s what was destroyed mainly. The workers homes so that they became fair game. It was called ‘total war’ meaning everyone in society was a target. The idea was that if you could kill off the workers, there’s no one left to work the factories, even if they spring up new ones.) It predicts that "21st Century operations will require soldiers to engage among populations and diverse cultures instead of avoiding them". (A: Now, the marines are already training - that was in the Army Times, I believe - guys, soldiers TO GO IN PLAIN CLOTHES AMONG CIVILIANS. It’s one of the biggest things going right now, training for that very, very thing.)
The document reveals that new US tactical doctrine provides a template by which air, naval and field commanders will no longer just secure traditional strategic targets such as airspace, seaports and bridgeheads, but will, of necessity, also deploy and fight amongst and against the target population itself to win wars. (A: Well, you’ve heard of ‘killing fields’, and that’s what they call them in the military, where the troops are sent in and anyone and anything who happens to be in front of them is eliminated.)
The document refers to this euphemistically as "commanders employing offensive, defensive and stability or civil support operations simultaneously".
The remainder of the document is devoted to describing in detail how a downsized all volunteer (A: Meaning mercenary.) US military - numbering approximately one million soldiers, aircrew and sailors - could maintain an ever-present, international, offensive posture in many countries across many time-zones.
It describes how information communication technologies and digital technologies will create a new "networked" human soldier - the 'Future Force Warrior' (A: Oh boy, Future Force Warrior or FFW) - who will deploy among the target population and will operate simultaneously several remote, unmanned ground and air weapons systems. (A: Ground and air weapons systems. Remember, that also means what they’re calling ‘modular packages’ they’re giving the regiments back home in the US of non-lethal weaponry. They’re called ‘modular packages’. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. Eugenics is all the topic today, the culling back of the population is coming from the United Nations and all other sources and all the NGO groups that are associated with the United Nations, all the well funded ones that are PAID big salaries by big foundations which comprise the parallel government. This is an article from Louisiana and it was also in, I think, The Associated Press.
Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
State Representative John LaBruzzo of Metairie said many of his constituents are tired of paying for children from poor families and that is why he is considering proposing legislation that would pay women on government assistance $1,000 if they choose to be sterilized.
“You have these people (A: THESE people, you see.) who are just fed up with working their buns off to try to provide for their own family (A: That’s how they always bring this argument. You know, this bunch against that bunch.) and being forced by the government o provide for others’ families who just want to have unlimited kids,” he said. (A: That means children. They use animal terms for children to dehumanize them.)
(A: This is an old, old thing which the eugenicists pull up… that you’re paying for all that. But they don’t mention that you’re also bailing out the banks that are looting BILLIONS off of you or they don’t mention that the money that governments spend on their military campaigns and their big profiteering campaigns. That’s all government is for. It’s a front to profiteer by having wars and raiding other countries. They don’t mention these things. They always turn it on to their OTHER problem which is the general population. You know, those that might outbreed their betters as Russell and others said… and Charles Galton Darwin.)
LaBruzzo said he is studying voluntary sterilization for women whose sole financial support comes from the government in the form of welfare or other public assistance. His idea would be to give the women $1,000 if they had their tubes tied.
His proposal has come under harsh criticism by some civil rights groups.
The ACLU called it a misguided and mean-spirited attempt to eliminate poverty by eliminating the poor. (A: Well, of course that’s the policy. That’s how you get rid of poverty. Remember when Presidents have wars on things. They have WAR on poverty and WAR on drugs. That’s a legal statement. It’s a WAR on the poor, you see.)
LaBruzzo said his office has been flooded by emails, many supporting his position. (A: Of course he will.)
“We have more in favor, saying, ‘good job, keep it going.’” he said. “Of course we have a lot saying you’re going in the wrong direction.”
LaBruzzo said that in addition to the sterilization of women, he would consider vasectomies for welfare dads and tax incentives for higher income families with children in private schools.
So there you go with the same old stuff all over again. Always to make you feel that you’re really gouged big time to pay for all the welfare people. They never mention either, the culture industry that’s given you a constant feed, from the 60s onwards, stream of ‘just do it’, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex, sex. They never mention that at all. Never ever, ever. No, they blame the effects of things but they don’t mention the CAUSES AND THOSE THINGS WHICH PROMOTE THEM. Isn’t that rather odd, wouldn’t you think? Because it’s nothing to do with the wealthier supporting the poor. That’s not the thing. They don’t WANT the poor there. They’ve already stated that they don’t need them anymore. The jobs they used to fill are all gone. The factories are gone. Now they’re simply cleaning up what’s left. THE HUMAN COLLATERAL… as they often call it.
Just before I go to the callers, here’s an item that’s interesting. I always tell you that for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction. We always hear about, ‘you can do your own thing’ but there’s no effect left in society. Yet, we never really ponder the problems or what’s behind the ideals that guide policy. Remember, there are big, powerful foundations like The Council on Foreign Relations which draft out policy AND GIVE IT TO GOVERNMENTS TO FOLLOW. The Club of Rome states that itself, as well. That’s part of what they do. We don’t elect these people. These big foundations are set up to be the REAL government. They bypass any ideas of democracy. THAT IS THEIR PURPOSE.
Eugenics has to get society to accept the killing of people. I’ve said this. It’s not popular. I hear the standard slogans that have been downloaded into people, through repetition, over and over and over again when I speak about these things. You see, it stared with abortion. Once we have no more horror about abortion, they’re now moving in to the elderly. I read that article last week from that rather aristocratic, old, I’ll hesitate to call her ‘woman’ in Britain. I read off what she stated about the elderly: wanting governments to have the POWER to kill them off. So there are effects. Individually, there are effects that ripple all THROUGH society for our own actions and we all suffer the consequences. I’m going to read this article after the following break.
I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Before the break I was talking about how there are consequences to everything in society. It’s very, very true. This society does not LIKE children terribly much. They’re a hindrance and a bother. Read Charles Galton Darwin’s book, The Next Million Years, and he talks about going through this technique and strategy of how to basically download into people the fact that they wouldn’t want children; they prefer to buy material things and go for the material things in life rather than being tied to children. It’s been very successful because the first step in getting the public to ACCEPT the killing off of the public is to always have a big, emotional topic to debate. It’s never done by the public themselves. They watch experts debate it for them on television and choose one side or the other, but that’s not the point. The point is, this is the eugenics plan and everyone is being used in this big plan. Everyone is used. Because, this is an economic system and they don’t like anyone who is not a good producer and consumer. So they don’t tolerate young moms with children very well. However, they do encourage all the sex - there’s such a stream of since about the 1960s onwards - and encourage all the behavior. You can’t turn on Much Music without seeing it right in your face. It’s everywhere… aimed right at young children. Quite amazing. And we all tolerate this and think nothing about it. The Mail Online:
One baby in 30 left alive after medical termination
by FIONA MACRAE
20 April 2007
(A: There’s a picture there of Gianna Jessen who was born after a failed abortion. That was 30 years ago. She’s still alive today.)
One in 30 babies aborted for medical reasons (A: Now, that’s the term they use for pretty well ALL of them, psychological or medical. The mother might have a nervous breakdown and so that does fine, it goes under medicine.) is born alive, a study has found.
They lived for an average of 80 minutes - although in some cases foetuses (A: Babies.) survived for over six hours.
Most of the babies were born between 20 and 24 weeks of pregnancy, but some had been in the womb for as little as 17 weeks.
The figures, based on a study of West Midlands hospitals, has reignited the abortion debate (A: There’s no debate, by the way. It‘s a ‘must be’ by the elite.), with pro-life campaigners demanding the time limit for terminations be cut.
Researchers looked at the outcome of 3,189 abortions performed on seriously handicapped foetuses at 20 hospitals between 1995 and 2004.
It showed that 102 - or around one in 30 - aborted for reasons such as Down's Syndrome and heart defects, were born alive. (A: By the way, that’s not quite true either, because a lot of these tests have a lot of false positives and false negatives. I’ve got another article on that… which I don’t have time to read tonight. But the mother is advised to have an abortion anyway.)
Abortions are allowed to be carried out if the pregnancy is shown to have an adverse effect on the mental health and wellbeing of the mother up until the 24th week of pregnancy.
Beyond this point, the procedure is only sanctioned if the baby has a severe disability or if the mother's life is at risk.
The latest study, carried out by experts from the West Midlands Perinatal Institute and published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, showed that three per cent of aborted disabled babies were born alive.
Most of the abortions studied were medical abortions. These involve a women being given a series of pills, taken in two doses two days apart.
The first dose, a single tablet of mifepristone, blocks the pregnancy hormones that normally ensure the womb's lining holds on to the fertilised egg. The second dose, of four tablets containing hormone-like prostaglandins, triggers contractions and a miscarriage.
The death of the baby is a result of the trauma of the early birth, rather than the tablets itself, meaning, in rare occasions, some babies may survive the process.
(A: Here’s how they get around this now. It’s quite amazing when we think of all… I think of Jacques Ellul when I read these articles when he talked about ALL fiction being propaganda. Hospital series and dramas, all fictional, all how they’re in the emergency room and they’re SO professional and how they can bring everybody back from the dead. That’s all they worry about. But it’s a complete cover. It’s propaganda to alter perceptions. They must alter perceptions in psychological warfare. Here’s how they’re going to get around this. He says….)
From 22 weeks, the tablets should be preceded by a lethal injection into the baby's heart to ensure the baby is dead before the procedure goes any further. (A: Guys get paid to do this… and they sleep well.)
If these babies are born alive, it suggests they weren't given the heart-stopping injection (A: You know, we go on and on about Adolf Hitler as though he was the first and last criminal of his type and yet we accept this in society. Now there are corpses on display in art galleries, hanging on wires. That’s how debased and degraded we all are. That’s where it really starts. It starts from this and leads on to all of that.)- perhaps because the doctor thought it would have been too traumatic for the mother. The figures follow several studies which show that babies born at 23 and 24 weeks are capable of surviving.
While there is no suggestion that any of the babies documented in the West Midlands study lived for more than a few hours, doctors in Norwich are currently treating a toddler born (A: They’re currently treating… that’s double-speak right away.) at 24 weeks after three botched terminations. (A: THREE times they tried to kill this toddler.)
He was born three years ago and is still alive. (A: You know, they used to hang people for MURDER and so on. If you didn’t die the first time they dropped you through the trap door, they’d often let you go free. Here they go at this three times to try and kill a toddler, by giving a LETHAL injection in the heart. This is not a convicted criminal here. And the toddler’s still alive after three years.)
Campaigners said it was likely the Midlands figures were just the tip of the iceberg (A: You bet they will be.) as the region only accounts for around a tenth of the babies born in the country each year.
In addition, the study only looked at babies whose lives were ended because of disability. (A: And they haven’t proven the disability yet either. You should actually see this because a lot of these children are diagnosed and misdiagnosed and I think it’s on purpose too. They have to get a legal clause somewhere on the certificate to do the abortion.)
As I say, now we’ve degraded in to ‘let’s go for the elderly’. You always go for the weak, you see, those who can’t stand up for themselves. Then you go for the elderly. Then you start working on those in between. And because society’s been trained that it’s all quite natural to kill each other off and we’ve had this massive propaganda of ‘there’s just too many of us walking the planet’, we accept this. We’re degraded and degraded and degraded until we can not SURVIVE. We can not defend ourselves anymore from the elite who have all this down pat as the plan of their agenda. Quite something. Quite something. The world we live in… is disgusting.
Here’s a point I’d like to make too, before I go on to the callers, a point which is important. The elite KNOW they’ve brought us ALL to this degraded society. They know they can’t keep us all going much longer, but to allow the next phase to come in, they had to degrade us. Because a degraded society won’t stand up for each other. THEY DON’T CARE about each other. They’re easy targets, easy meat. They also know that you’ve accepted DEATH as a part of life. Not natural death, EUTHANASIA. Overpopulation is being used as an excuse and all the rest of it. You accept that. Once you do that, you’re destroyed. That was the INTENT of this movement many, many years ago. Nothing to do with the rights of the woman. It was the elite who sponsored and funded this. LOOK at the foundations who paid for it all.
Alan: Now, we’ll go to Steve from Denver. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Oh yes. Yes. I’m here. Thank you for taking my call, Alan. Just let me get my question out of the way. You’ve mentioned very infrequently about this 360° Masonic situation. Please tell me if you know of ANY 360° Masons and if so who are they?
Alan: There is an organization at the top that uses different terms. Prince Charles used it a couple of times. He called them ‘the Olympians’. It’s a very prestigious, high-level group of VERY wealthy, old families. Of course, they do the circle, as it’s called, Completion. You’ll see it too on a lot of the symbols put out there. Even in theosophy they’ll give you an exoteric meaning for the general public, including the members at the low orders.
Steve: Could you just name one individual? Are you saying Prince Charles is a 360° Olympian?
Alan: I wouldn’t say he would be because I saw him when he hit his 40th, I think it was his 40th, birthday and he went on stage in front of all the Lords of Britain who all wore there robes and so on. He had a glass of Champagne in one hand and then he did his little angled degree with his right arm, then put it straight out from him. So he’s up there, for sure, but he doesn’t have the brains to be in the higher levels.
Steve: Could you name a 360° Olympian?
Alan: You can’t name them. You can only get the names of their organizations.
Steve: Okay. So you don’t know anyone personally that you could put a name on so we can take a look at them and see how…
Alan: I certainly could but I won’t.
Steve: Oh, could but won’t. Okay.
Alan: I’m talking about people I’ve met.
Steve: I’m going to make a quick statement and that is that we are witnessing the end game. They are buying up the assets at pennies on the dollar. They way they’ve always done at the shearing of the sheep time and it’s sheering of the sheep time. We could sing that along with the Christian ‘Bringing in the Sheep’ only it’s ‘shearing UP the sheep’.
Alan: That’s right.
Steve: At any rate, lastly, your opinion on the elections. What’s going on with the elections and the debate tonight? They’re on the red carpet. That normally means that the royal family connected. What’s the connection, Alan?
Alan: The connection is widely known. That the US basically went over to Britain at the Treaty of Paris and most folk, again, don’t want to read that treaty but they should. It was basically an amalgamation. The elite and the aristocracy, and there is an aristocracy IN the United States, that became part of and parcel of the British Empire AND their agenda. We find that when they set up the Round Table societies, under Lord Milner and they also had the Cecil Rhodes Society, that was the group that merged IN to the Council on Foreign Relations for the United States. THAT was the final merger. That is why they went along with the same policies as Britain. Margaret Thatcher referred to it as ‘our special relationship’. Other politicians referred to it as ‘their special relationship’ all along. Also, the same bankers that run the British system sent Jacob Schiff and others along to running the US economy back in the 1800s. Of course, Schiff was brought up in the Rothschild’s home, probably as another child of maybe another Rothschild wife but not his official one, but he did have official Rothschild backing and given the respect of a full-blown Rothschild. So the US was merged in to this system long ago.
Steve: Why won’t you name an Olympian?
Alan: Because I know a couple and it’s good to know a couple if you want information.
Steve: Oh. Okay. Alright. Well, thank you and have a nice evening. Thank you, sir.
Alan: You too. That’s the whole thing. There are people who definitely run this world. They’ve always run this world. They give religions a time to run the system as they did in the past. You were taught the religion, the only religions you would ever know. They would be the religions which gave you a meaning for life. It’s the only meaning for life you’d have. You’d know nothing about any kind of science whatsoever. However, today, they’ve given us a new scientific priesthood but they’re also merging it with a world religion. This world religion is based on sustainability, greening, the whole new age phenomena where you’ll worship mother earth and all the rest of it - it’s right out in the open - and the culling off of ‘the unwashed masses’. They don’t want them around much longer.
However, I’ve had a chat with a couple I’ve met in my travels across the world. You bump into them in odd places, on board ships if you’re moving and stuff like that. If you get to know them, they let little things out of the bag… with a little sparkle in their eye, you might say. Whenever they talk about something, it’s self-assuredly. There’s no hesitation. There’s no guesswork involved. They just tell you about a specific topic and this is what’s going to happen. They might not explain the whys or how they’re going to do it but they just say, this is how it’s going to be.
To be honest with you, all of that stuff is mainstream now. You can look at that newspapers any day and they tell you what’s coming up. It’s just that the public really can’t believe it. They can not believe it. It’s TOO BIG to comprehend that their entire existence has been completely managed, that they have left no loopholes for you to escape to. And you’re at their mercy everywhere you look. That’s why they don’t want to believe it. People are taught there must be a way out of things. In the movies, there’s generally a happy ending. The bad guys get killed and the good guys win, but that’s not real life. But they still look for the hope, you see. They always look for the hope from SOMEONE ELSE, never from themselves because THEY’RE not going to do anything about it. As long as you’re willing to sit back and let others do it for you and not participate, you’re doomed. It’s as simple as that. These guys have given you your leaders down through centuries to follow. For every type of personality out there in society, they have a leader out there and a group for you to join. You go around in circles forever and ever as you go down the whirlpool and go down the drain. YOU ARE YOUR OWN CHAMPION. No one else. You are your own champion and you’ve got to reclaim the right to say yes or no… and you mean it when you say one or the other. Yes or no. If you have no convictions about right or wrong, then you’re doomed. Simple as that.
Alan: There’s Eric from North Carolina. Are you there Eric?
Eric: Alan, thanks for all your help. Speaking on the big lie, are you familiar with Project Blue Beam?
Eric: Research by a [inaudible] who coincidentally died of a heart attack and I was just curious if their agenda doesn’t go as planned that that would be a nice ace in the hole and quicken things up. I was just thinking on that plan, they do the invasion, kill a billion or two and….
Alan: Hold on and I’ll go into that after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and to answer Eric from North Carolina. It’s true the Blue Beam Project was a form of holography. Holographs which were projected into the sky and they were thinking of using this and even using religious themes and give you sky pictures at night. Pictures which would convince many people, it wouldn’t take much today with the new age and all the rest of it, that this was REAL. Because religion’s always been used down through the ages. Look at ex-Prime Minister Blair from Britain who’s leading this movement to bring ALL religions back together in to this NEW religion where they’re all equal and no one’s especially right over the other. So, they use religion. They’re using science as well and they did think also of giving UFO invading and all this kind of stuff. All different ideas that might be used on the public, if necessary, to get us to rush along in a panic into this brave new world and religious themes certainly were thought of as being used.
Alan: Now, there’s Nicole in Manitoba. Are you there Nicole?
Nicole: Hello? Hi Alan.
Nicole: It’s good to talk to you. Thank you so much for taking my call. I just wanted to say that your books are really good. I ordered them and I also liked the DVDs that came with it. It was really, really interesting. Anybody out there who hasn’t ordered it, I highly recommend it. I’m planning on ordering your new book and your new DVDs too. I hope everything in Ontario is going okay. Are you getting sprayed a lot there recently?
Alan: They sprayed incredibly this morning. There was this like spider-webby stuff that came down. It was all over the clothing I had hanging up to dry. Like short fibers an inch long, most of them, just covered all over these sheets I had hanging up.
Nicole: In Manitoba last week, we really, really got doused for about 5 or 6 days straight. Today there seems to be a bit of a break. I just wanted to ask you about Foucault. When I hear you talking sometimes, you remind me almost of Foucault. I was just wondering if you’ve read his works or if he influenced you in some way or….
Alan: I haven’t to be honest with you.
Nicole: Because he talks about power and knowledge and the power/knowledge couplet and…
Alan: I think he’s on the right journey. Whenever you’re on the right journey, you’ll always go through the same thinking mode, as you do your searching, and hopefully you come to the same conclusions, which leads you to a form of integrity for yourself. You realize you’ve got to have it for yourself above everything else. That’s how you win all battles individually and collectively. Society today has been made to be apathetic and they’ll actually cheat on each other in many, many different ways in this rat race system. So, the regaining of integrity and morality - morality isn’t the cultural morality that’s fed to you in any era - there’s a natural morality and they also call that a LAW of nature. It’s quite simple to see that if you break the laws of nature, you have chaos. Those who understand this can also use those laws of nature and break them for you or HELP YOU to break them by encouraging certain behaviors. Then we all end up suffering. They use these techniques. So, on your searches for meaning and purpose, you generally will end up along the same path, if you’re on the right path, you’ll end up on that same path that others have trod before. Thanks for calling.
Nicole: Thank you Alan.
Alan: From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada where they’re spraying the blazes out of the sky right now, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
"US generals planning for resource wars" by Tom Clonan, Irish Times - Sept. 22, 2008.
"The 2008 Army Modernization Strategy" (army.mil).
"One baby in 30 left alive after medical termination" by Fiona Macrae (dailymail.co.uk) - April 20, 2007.
"Metairie legislator proposes sterilization for poor women" Associated Press (at current.com).
Transcribed by Diana