Sept. 12, 2008 (#166)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 12, 2008:
Sustainability, the Greenies are Stormin',
Rebuffed by Logic of Professor Takeda's Warning,
Need Public Support, Propagandists do Thunder,
We'll Keep You Safe while We Profit and Plunder,
Society's Not Safe, Terrorism Residual,
From the Gene Pool of Some Unique Individual,
From the Human Genome to the Human Zoo,
Gene Splicing, Chimeras, We've Got Plans for You"
© Alan Watt Sept. 12, 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 12, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi Folks, I am Alan Watt and this IS Cutting Through The Matrix on September the 12th, 2008. I always advise newcomers to look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site where you can download lots of previous talks concerning this whole big, strange, milieu, this New World Order, weíre stuck in and weíre being carried along with. I tell you where itís going, I tell you the big players and how they organize it and I try to motivate you into getting active because weíre ALL involved in this and really, itís not a pleasant ending if you follow this agenda with its depopulation program and all the rest of it that theyíve got stuck in there. And, itís not as though itís all hidden. Itís out in the open now, especially when you look through the big scientific papers that are being put out all the time by institutions in global meetings and the funding they get from the big foundations. Theyíre right in you face now with where they want to take the world. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can download transcripts in the various languages of Europe. Print them up and pass them around to your friends.
I just got off another show a little while ago there and I should also mention that tomorrow is Saturday and Iíll be on a station, KLBJ in Austin, Texas tomorrow at 7pm Eastern Time for 2 hours for those who have nothing better to do on the weekend.
We ARE certainly on a roll, as I say when so much information is in your face. I think itís because they have the public so terrified, so anxious about their society that their work, their economy, and all the rest of it, that they must get us into a stampede mode where they can guide us at every turn that we think weíre going into but in reality, theyíre driving at the front. Theyíre steering us all into this Brave New World scenario, right in the open, right in your face and the youngsters especially are the ones theyíre targeting because they have to grow up in the Brave New World where they will think that anything goes. Anything goesÖ thatís the big lieÖ because NO, anything does NOT go unless itís allowed by the agenda thatís on the books. Anything outside the agenda, will NOT be tolerated, whatsoever.
Under the guise of freedom, you can be made a slave quite easily when you think youíre having fun. Thatís what they sold the populations during the 60s and 70s during the big dope and rock and roll era and free love and all the rest of it. Free love was a term coined in the 1880s and 1890s and printed at that time by a propagandist for this agenda, HG Wells. Free love he called it. The only problem in his day is there was generally consequences to the free love. People caught certain things that were not terribly social, although they now call them social diseasesÖ kind of hard to get rid of. It goes along with an old song; itís called Great Balls of Fire. However, thatís how long ago they planned that great freedom enterprise, the big trick to BREAK the old society, the old ways of doing things, the old culture and create the new. You can certainly be enslaved when you think youíre having fun. Because thatís when the big boys are rushing ahead and building a prison around you, a prison that generally is invisible to begin with but then begins to manifest itself in your lifetime until you find you canít move without permission.
The days between being followed by a policeman wonít bring you comfort anymore. Youíre terrified when thereís a cop on your tail. You donít know if youíll end up in the hospital getting tazered or what. Things have changed DRASTICALLY and our servants are our masters. Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I try to keep people in the land of reality, the REAL reality, because believe you me, thereís so much DISinformation put out there by those who control the cultures and the media and entertainment industry and youíll find a lot of them in fact, even belong to various intelligence organizations and sub-sects thereof. Theyíre put out into society to truly spin off with truth into science fiction. Thatís their job, where people cannot tell the difference between reality and fiction any more. Thatís even in the department of psychological warfare, their manual. I downloaded one of their manuals recently. Itís for public access. Itís made available to the general public. They tell you in it that they have to BLUR the distinction between reality and fiction to paralyze an enemy. And that really is what happens.
Weíve been taught, you see, that weíre insignificant as individuals. That nothing we can do will really change society in any great way. Thatís the first big lie. We just swallow the lies, you see, to be conquered. Then they tell youÖ and this was a project, I think Bill Cooper mentioned it once. I think it was Project Jason that was born back in the 50s or so or 60s, 1960s, where they said that if mankind could be convinced that some superior type alien intelligence had created them to be inferior species, then the war would be over. You canít beat your master; youíre too inferior, you see. We saw the plethora of science fiction movies along that theme. Then out came certain writers to do with wellÖ the Annunaki, you see, created you to be an inferior type slave. All of that kind of stuff went right along with that agenda. Big money promoted that agenda too. Then, many other people, even in the Patriot Movement came out and carried that thing forward and blended fact with fiction until you throw out the baby with the bath water. You throw out the truth with the fiction and become disgusted at it all. That is psychological warfare. Thatís how it works.
People also ask me many times about spirituality and how you find it. Generally what they do is to try and find out what people have done before. They donít realize that the message all down through the ages is that you are like the journey of the sun. Your life is the sunís journey in a day. Youíre born, you go through it. You learn, youíre powerful at times and then you go. You give your life for the world, as they say, at sunset. Only you can experience your own experiences. Anything else is following someone elseís belief. Therefore, you CANíT simply, purely emulate 100% someone else. Youíre trying to BE someone else. You can certainly take wisdom from people, bits and pieces and philosophies and bits and pieces of that too. And donít forget that even within the philosophies they were meant to BEND a personís mind into a certain direction by what was called at the time different noble orders or societies. You must THINK FOR YOURSELF.
Which brings me to a topic I just grabbed tonight, because I was thinking about how weíre conned left, right and center, and how weíve been trained even to do with recycling and I thought about it at the time. I can remember when the big push was on to stop paper bags being sold at grocery stores and shops and everything suddenly had to be plastic and how much more environmentally friendly it was going to be. If youíve noticed, you canít even carry a bag out the grocery store without the tins or whatever youíve got inside are falling through them. Theyíre so thin. Plastic is all a byproduct of the petroleum industry. The oil company industries, the big boys again. The guys who own the foundations that run the world.
Hereís one person in Japan, you had to go to Japan to get someone with common sense on this topic whoís Professor Kunihiko Takeda. Heís a professor at an institute of science and technology research at Chubu University and heís written books on this and different papers on this whole idea of sustainability and so on, how weíve been stampeded along to this path that weíre going extinct because weíre consuming too much. He says here,
Tuesday July 22, 2008
Words to Live By
Professor Kunihiko Takeda
By Judit Kawaguchi
Our future is bright as long as we stop recycling old ideas and things. The new paradigm is always better than the one before: Our air, water and food quality are higher than in previous generations, (Alan: Now thatís true. You know, even in the West here we forget that they had MASSIVE sulfuric clouds over parts of England during the industrial revolution right into the late 1800s, early 1900s. Well, all those factories have gone and they donít burn coal any more but they keep hyping that itís never been as bad as it is today. Itís all how you perceive things if you actually swallow the indoctrination and PROPAGANDA thatís never ending.) and our life expectancy longer. Thereís no need to worry: Humans are smart.
I am a teacher before I am a scientist. In the first year of university, I talk about the concept of dedication, which students donít seem to know at all. For them, studying is something they do for themselves, but really it is what we do to contribute to othersí lives.
Recycling is rubbish: It eats more energy and creates more waste than burning our garbage in high-tech incinerators. The most efficient way of getting rid of garbage is burning it all together. Why? Because in raw garbage, plastics turn into their own fuel so you donít need to add anything else. (A: Because itís made from basically OIL products, you see?) Aluminum and steel should be recycled, though, as we need less energy for that than to produce them from scratch. (A: Then he goes on to say something which is very important. Hereís a guy who thinks, you see. This is very rare these days.)
Fear is a very efficient weapon: It produces the desired effect without much waste. (A: Isnít that the truth?) Global warming has nothing to do with how much CO2 is produced or what we do here on Earth. For millions of years, solar activity has been controlling temperatures on Earth and even now, the sun controls how high the mercury goes. CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another. Soon it will cool down anyhow, once again, regardless of what we do. Every scientist knows this, but it doesnít pay to say so. (A: For the hard of thinking, Iíll repeat that last part. Every scientist knows this but it doesnít PAY to say so. Thatís how they make their living is on smelling the wind and seeing what direction it goes and getting their grants from the big boys who are directing this agenda.) What makes a whole lot of economic and political sense is to blame global warming on humans and create laws that keep the status quo and prevent up-and-coming nations from developing. Global warming, as a political vehicle, (A: A POLITICAL vehicle, thatís what it is.) keeps Europeans in the driverís seat and developing nations walking barefoot. (A: And that is true. They donít want people in the developing nations becoming developed because they wonít have access in the West to plundering their land for minerals and metals and all the rest of it.)
Criticizing previous ideals is natural. In the 1930s, militarism was considered best; in the 1960s, mass production and mass consumerism. Then in the 1990s the main topic was the environment. Every 30 years we switch what we believe in. This paradigm will pass, too. (A: Heís right but he probably doesnít know that itís PLANNED that way, you see?)
Look beyond what governments tell you. Some praise ethanol as a substitute for oil, but making fuel out of corn makes sense only if you want to increase the price of corn and fuel at the same time. In order to grow corn, one needs lots of fuel and once the corn is ready, instead of becoming a nice meal, it gets picked and turned back into fuel again. This is just a way to purposely create a food and energy shortage (A: THIS IS JUST A WAY TO PURPOSELY CREATE A FOOD AND ENERGY SHORTAGE, thatís for the hard of thinking again.) until only the very rich can afford to eat and move. (A: Well, you see, whether he knows it or not, heís right on target here. Whether he knows it for the right reasons, I donít know.)
Getting married is easier than getting divorced. Same if we have a bowl of rice and a bowl of soybeans: Itís easy to mix the two but very hard to separate them. For water and red ink, it is next to impossible. It should take the same energy to mix and separate things but it does not: This is the rule of entropy. Now imagine the whole Earth from space and you can see entropy at work: Pet bottles, newspapers and cars are scattered around, and recycling is an attempt to put all the groups together again.
Consumerism marketed as environmental consciousness is the worst. Take the ďMy HashiĒ campaign for example (buying and carrying reusable chopsticks rather than using disposable ones). Chopsticks should be made out of the unnecessary branches that are cut to help trees grow bigger and healthier. (A: Thatís true. Just think about it. How they con you and con you and con you. They actually throw away all that stuff that they cut off the trees when theyíre trimming them and thatís what you made the chopsticks out of and they tell them theyíre scarce.) Instead of burning those branches, we should make chopsticks. That would be good for both the trees and us. (A: See how your perceptions are distorted when you donít think for yourself? You can be fooled SO EASILY by propaganda. And itís true, weíve been taught NOT to think or reason for ourselves like Zbigniew Brzezinski says.)
This is a good article. People should go into it and read it for themselves. Itís written by Professor Kunihiko Takeda and thatís the Japan Times Online from July 22, 2008. Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, trying to get to the heart of the matter, and itís not an easy job because we have SO much in our way, so much data and DISinformation and entertainment and often the two are mixed together so much and I found that from a lot of these New Age prophets who are doing their circuits in the world that blended with groups of Patriotists, at least Patriot programs, and they really are fuzzying reality even more so. People STOP trying to do something about whatís happening in their own lives because they think itís hopeless. After all, if some big, giant lizard made you to be an inferior type slave, well, you can beat that can you? Youíre done for. Thatís psychological warfare. Thatís how it works.
Itís not easy getting to truth and therefore, itís best to stick to the mainstream books, the ones that are put out BY the big boys, the technocrats they call them, those that move behind the scenes who are advisors to Presidents and Prime Ministers across the world and who write books about it. They write books about the agenda. Quite blatantly, right in your face, itís just that theyíre not widely known or theyíre not publicized much. Theyíre not on the New Yorkís best readers list for the week.
You have to think for yourself, once youíve read them because itís hard to digest the fact that there ARE people in this world, who PLAN ahead, by the generations, many generations, who have objectives to reach. They donít care how many peopleÖ or wars they create in the process, how many people they kill. They donít care. Itís irrelevant to them. Theyíre psychopathic in nature.
I can remember reading about Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill was into toy soldiers his whole life long, even when he died he had a whole MASSIVE room laid aside in Glenin Castle, his home, family home. He had the main stream battles of Waterloo and all these kind of main battles lined up with all the toy soldiers and all the cannons and so on. That it how he saw real people, just the same way; they were just toy soldiers to him. These are the psychopathic types who plan our future. They have mandates. They say at the top of Masonry that three men marching in step can do far more than 100 all walking at their own pace and doing their own thing. In other words, theyíre organized. They close ranks and they protect and help each other along the way.
Weíre going under the biggest tyranny the world has ever seen and it must be the biggest tyranny because they plan to eliminate that part of us which is human. That part which gives us empathy and hope and love and tears and laughter and all the rest of it. Because itís in the way of being efficient, itís not efficient enough. It also gives you your individuality. They must eliminate individuality. The United Nations has written about that. They say that their biggest problem is individuality. They claim it causes wars and all this kind of stuff. UTTER NONSENSE! They know darned well that to standardize a WORLD you must eliminate people who are characters; people with true character, whoíve developed their own individuality. Itís individuals down through the ages whoíve given us the best works of writing and thought and philosophy. It never came from the bulk of the populaceÖ who followÖ never.
This article here is from Michael Chossudovsky from Globalresearch.ca on Sept the 11th, 2008. It says here,
9/11 and the "American Inquisition"
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, September 11, 2008
Today's "Global War on Terrorism" is a modern form of inquisition. (Alan: Read about the inquisition.) It has all the essential ingredients of the French and Spanish inquisitions.
Going after ďIslamic terrorists", carrying out a Worldwide preemptive war (A: Preemptive means you attack first because you suspect you might get attacked. SuspectÖ What a great justification.) to " protect the Homeland" are used to justify a military agenda.
"The Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) is presented as a "Clash of Civilizations", a war between competing values and religions, when in reality it is an outright war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives.
The GWOT is the ideological backbone of the American Empire. It defines US military doctrine, including the preemptive use of nuclear weapons against the "state sponsors" of terrorism. (A: Again, all these little buzz words, STATE SPONSORS. You hear all these things used over and over and you never think what they mean.)
The preemptive "defensive war" (A: Defensive war) doctrine and the "war on terrorism" against Al Qaeda constitute essential building blocks of America's National Security Strategy as formulated in early 2002. The objective is to present "preemptive military action" --meaning war as an act of "self-defense" against two categories of enemies, "rogue States" (A: Now, thatís from the United Nations. Anyone who pulls out and goes their own way is called a rogue nation or a rogue state.) and "Islamic terrorists", both of which are said to possess weapons of mass destruction. (A: Iím using all the slogans here.)† The logic of the ďoutside enemyĒ and the evildoer, allegedly responsible for American civilian deaths, prevails over common sense. In the inner consciousness of Americans, the attacks of September 11, 2001 justify acts of war and conquest.
The legitimacy of the inquisition is not questioned. The "Global War on Terrorism" justifies a mammoth defense budget at the expense of health, education, and virtually every single category of (civilian) public expenditure.† The "Global War on Terrorism" requires "going after" the terrorists, using advanced weapons systems. It upholds a preemptive religious-like crusade against evil, which serves to obscure the real objectives of military action.
Iíll be back with more of this article, because this is very important, after these messages.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Iím going through a document here, a report from GlobalResearch.ca by a Professor Chossudovsky talking about the techniques that are used through propaganda and people and how we have our opinions GIVEN to us, we have our perceptions GIVEN to us by experts. Thatís their job. Theyíre a form of scientist. They understand how we think and how we process information and they can control whole nations this wayÖ by selective propaganda, selective information and the omission of the truth always and definitely the omissions of ALL the other sides of any story. It says here,
underlying 9/11 are known and documented. The American people's acceptance of
this crusade against evil is not based on any rational understanding or
analysis of the facts.
America's inquisition is used to extend America's sphere of influence and justify military intervention, as part of an international campaign against "Islamic terrorists". Its ultimate objective, which is never mentioned in press reports, is territorial conquest and control over strategic resources. (Alan: And this goes hand-in-glove with this interdependence, global interdependence that youíre told about, you see, you hear it now and then. How weíre all interdependent and it is true. The economic system is completely blended, intertwined, all over the world. All the rich people have their shares in companies across THE WHOLE PLANET. They donít have nations any more when it comes to economics at the top. Itís a huge WEB of interrelated shares and resources and so onÖ and corporations.)
The GWOT dogma is enunciated and formulated by Washington's neoconservative think tanks. It is carried out by the military-intelligence establishment. It is embodied in presidential speeches and press conferences:
"We've been warned there are evil people in this world. We've been warned so vividly. ... And we'll be alert. Your government is alert. The governors and mayors are alert that evil folks still lurk out there. As I said yesterday, people have declared war on America and they have made a terrible mistake. ... My administration has a job to do and we're going to do it. We will rid the world of the evil-doers," (George W. Bush, CNN, September 16, 2001, emphasis added).
An understanding of fundamental social and political events is replaced by a World of sheer fantasy, where "evil folks" are lurking. The objective of the "Global War on Terrorism" launched in September 2001 is to galvanize public support (A: Itís the first thing you must do for war is get public support.) for a Worldwide campaign against heresy. In the eyes of public opinion, possessing a "just cause" for waging war is central. A war is said to be Just if it is waged on moral, religious or ethical grounds. (A: So they bring the terminology in. Religious terminology and moral terminology and talk about ethics and so on.)
The Demonization of Muslims and the Battle for Oil
The US led war in the broader Middle East Central Asian region consists in gaining control over extensive reserves of oil and natural gas. The Anglo-American oil giants also seek to gain control over oil and gas pipeline routes out of the region.
Muslim countries possess 66 percent of total oil reserves. (Michel Chossudovsky, The "Demonization" of Muslims and the Battle for Oil, Global Research, January 4, 2007.) (A: Thatís another article he wrote.) In contrast, the United States of America has barely 2 percent of total oil reserves. Iraq has five times more oil than the United States.
Demonization is applied to an enemy, which possesses more than 60 percent of the world's oil reserves. "Axis of evil", "rogue States", "failed nations", "Islamic terrorists": demonization and vilification are the ideological pillars of America's Inquisition. They serve as a casus belli for waging the battle for oil.
The Battle for Oil requires the demonization of those who possess the oil. The enemy is characterized as evil, with a view to justifying military action including the mass killing of civilians. (Ibid)
Historical Origins of the Inquisition
The objective is to sustain the illusion that "America is under attack" by Al Qaeda. Under the American inquisition, Washington has a self-proclaimed holy mandate to extirpate Islamic fundamentalism and "spread democracy" throughout the world. (A: Isnít that the way theyíre doing it?)
"Going after Bin Laden" is part of a consensus. Fear and insecurity prevail over common sense. Despite the evidence, the White House, the State Department, the two Party system, cannot, in the minds of Americans, be held responsible for a criminal act (9/11/) resulting in the deaths of American civilians.
What we are dealing with is an outright and blind acceptance of the structures of power and political authority.
You should read that for yourselves, the rest of this article.† Theyíre showing you the techniques that have been used down through the ages to justify plunder, but itís more than just that as they change the entire worldÖremember itís a hundred years war. A hundred years war where NOTHINGÖ remember that statement we heard after 9/11ÖNOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE THE SAME AGAIN. That was broadcast to the world. You should listen to these little statements that come out after these disasters because they mean it, theyíre legalities. Weíve also got new FREEDOM, a new definition of freedom. Did you choose that definition? NO. Itís done by your betters, those who planned it all in the first place.
Hereís an article from the French, the people who are pretty quiet and are not liked because of their french-fries and all the rest of it, who tend to do a lot of navel gazing and pretending the worldís not there, it doesnít exist around them, but itís catching up regardless because their boys are in on it too. This is from MSNBC.com home web site and it says here,
By Estelle Shirbon
updated 10:23 a.m. PT, Thurs., Sept. 4, 2008
PARIS - Opposition to a new security database is gaining momentum in France (Alan: Now I mentioned, because itís the same world-wide, theyíre doing this EVERYWHERE.) as people return to work after a summer break during which the government authorized the state to store personal information on people as young as 13.
The decree creating the "Edvige" electronic database appeared in the official gazette on July 1, when the country was winding down for the summer, but news of its content has been gradually filtering out and is now stirring fierce criticism.
"The Edvige database has no place in a democracy," wrote Michel Pezet, a lawyer and former member of a body charged with protecting French citizens from electronic prying, in Thursday's edition of the newspaper Le Monde.
"There is nothing in the decree that sets limits or a framework. Whether the database is used with or without moderation depends only on orders from up high. The electronic Bastille is upon us," he wrote.
He was referring to the notorious Paris fortress in which French kings could arbitrarily imprison opponents until it was stormed on July 14, 1789, at the start of the French Revolution.
The decree says the aim is to centralize (A: Centralization, remember, the major plank of communism) and analyze data on people aged 13 or above who are active in politics or labor unions, (A: At 13 years of age!) who play a significant institutional, economic, social or religious role, (A: Or religious role) or who are "likely (A: likely) to breach public order." (A: See, theyíre collecting your personality profile and from that theyíll say, ďYouíre likely or unlikely to breach public orderĒ in your lifetime. So, they want to basically grab you before it happensÖ like a pre-arrest, they call it.)
The information that can be collected includes addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, physical appearance, behavioral traits, fiscal and financial records, and details about people who have personal ties with the subject.
Critics say this means the police can store data on people's ethnic origin, sexual preference or intimate relationships.
An online petition calling on the government to scrap Edvige has gathered over 103,700 signatures since July 10, according to its website on http://nonaedvige.ras.eu.org.
The reason Iím reading this is because as I say, this is happening ACROSS THE WORLD. There are no countries any more. The boys who are in this big world club, the big club that was created before the United Nations was set up officially and who run this world, run all the countries, theyíre one big club at the top. Theyíre all doing the same things world-wide at the same time. Until we canít MOVE, weíre going to be STIFLED because under the UN agenda of free trade and the free flow of goods and LABOR, as they stated it. They also state that too, by the way, for the American Union, the free flow of goods and LABOR. But itís not the free flow of goods. You try and sell something across state-side if youíre not authorized. Itís for the ones who are authorized onlyÖ the big corporations. And the free flow of labor, it sounds so wonderful to people who want to think globally, and youíre free. Free labor, why not just move and work? No. This is labor, you see, where youíve been sponsored into the country by the corporation that needs you. Thatís what itís coming down to.
Because the countries are going to get turned into PRISON camps for everyone and if you canít get out of the country through some corporation NEEDING your assistance, you wonít get out. In fact, into the Sovietized system, which has been set up, eventually with your ID card, you wonít be able to move out of your own AREAÖ without permission or a pass or a permit. Thatís whatís coming down.
I hope you realize it and itís always double meanings behind what they tell you. Donít take anything at face value. Check it out. Look at their preambles on these various charters they draw up at the United Nations and for the Summit of the Americas and the Union of the Americas. Look at the preambles because they give you the definitions of the terms they will be using. Theyíre generally so far away from what you would think if you didnít read the new definitions.
Well, Iíll go to the callers now and Iíve got Zee from New York, are you there Zee?
Zee: Yeah, hey Alan.† How are you doing? How are you and Hamish?
Alan: Weíre hanginí in here.
Zee: Good, good. Listen, I had a question and itís kind of off topic from your talk on terror and all that but I hope you can enlighten me a little bit on a term. What I find, whenever Iím debating or discussing something that somebodyÖ regarding 9/11 or any other quote, unquote conspiracy theory, and I hate to use that term, you know what Iím saying, they bring up Occamís Razor. Meaning that the simplest explanation is usually the right one and they say well, nobody could everÖ that such a conspiracy would never be possible, blah, blah, blah, and they always bring up Occamís Razor as one of their defenses. Could you talk about that, explain that a little bit to us?
Alan: Well, youíll find, I talked on a show earlier before this one, about how the Cecil Rhodes Society, when old Cecil was in charge of it, how he got a bunch of mercenaries together in South Africa and they attacked the Boers, the South Africans, and then, they even had their own reporters there who wrote back to London to say the Boers were killing off Englishmen, and that gave the British a pretense to come in and start taking over. Take the land away from South Africa from the Boers. They always create a pretense for war. Thatís standard historyÖ STANDARD history. If you look at the Romans, and of course, a lot of the writers, the later historians will tell you well, they brought civilization to the world. Well, they never explained what civilization IS. What they brought in was a giant militarized system that basically enslaved peoples and worked them and taxed them to death. Thatís what Rome did. That was civilization. That is how it was defined in those days. So they always justify the reasons for making war, or stealing land or property or resources from other people. That is standard in history. I donít know if thereís ever truly been a just war, to be honest with you. The only ones we have that could possibly be JUST are when rebellions take place against tyranny, when people are trying to plunder their land or plunder their lives or take something from them or put them under slavery. Thatís the only time that thereís a just war are from those that retaliate. Although, if you retaliate, youíll always be called a terrorist. Remember, the founding fathers were called terrorists. Anyone who opposed even prior to that, the British Monarchy, was called a traitor and terrorist. That was standard. There was never a free societyÖ NEVER a free society that existed prior to the American Revolution. All over Europe, across the world, you were a subject to a Monarch. A subject means you were owned. You were literally owned by the Monarch. We forget that. Therefore, history is always written by the victors. We know that people who pooh-pooh the September 11th attacks, well, if they love coincidences, how come Papa Bush mentioned ďThe New World Order coming into viewĒ? in that big speech he made on Sept the 11th, 1990! And then he repeated it a year later on Sept the 11th, 1991! And then his son takes over eventually and BINGO, 2001 comes along, on September the 11th and they get their merry wish. But prior to that, in the 90s, the Project for a New American Century, look it up on their web site, they have their own site up there, this group of Neo-conservatives, and in that Project for a New American Century, they tell you, thereís always been an Empire, and WE, the American Empire, will RUN this century. Then they go through the list of countries that will be the potential enemies and youíll find in there, thereís Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and so on. They list all the potential enemies.
Zee: Yeah and the next one is Iran.
Alan: Yes. And you know something, youíll find thatÖ see the CIA just took over and actually worked with MI6, from Britain. Britain RAN the world for centuries. They had it marked out when major things would happen on the planet, maybe a hundred years down the road. During the Viet Nam War, the CIA were already working on the next wars and the next wars and the next wars. Thatís how you do it. They also work on how it must be put on the public, put over to the publicÖ through propaganda. Do you remember the FIRST world trade center bombing?
Zee: Where the FBI actually cooked the bomb and trained the drivers and their inside man actually taped (Alan: thatís right) their conversations and it all leaked out and it was on major TV and whoops, yeah.
Alan: Thatís right. Hold on and weíll go into THAT, weíll go into that after this break. Just hold on.
Hi folks. Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and Iím talking to Zee from New York concerning people who are hard to get through, to people who keep pooh-poohing that fact that people would actually go to these lengths to create such a disaster so they could use itÖ then again, too, thatís a human reaction. We think that no one else would do such a thing because we personally wouldnít do that. Thatís why psychopaths get away with it in every generation. Because we wonít believe that theyíd actually set it up and do itÖ simple as that.
Itís true that during that first World Trade Center bombing it was on CBC television, here in Canada, documentaries on it, where the guy literally was told to put the bomb in, of course, he said itíll be a fake bomb wonít it? This is on tape. And his FBI handler said oh, no, we supply the real stuff. Thatís why the guy was taping them. He knew he was getting set up to take the can. Thatís how it happens. Itís the same with the Main, when they blew up the Main. They unearthed it a couple of years ago, and said the explosion happened from within. Well, what war did that start off, eh? Claiming they were being attacked. This is an old, old con game. Now, weíll go to Bazra from Australia. Are you there Bazra?
Bazra: Hello, Alan?
Bazra: Itís nice to talk with you. Iíve been listening to your show for a couple of years now and Iíve bought your books and your video and I know that youíve got a new one now. Iím looking forward to saving up enough for that too. Iím just wondering about the word play of these big players, in particular, one of the big players, Zbigniew Brzezinski. What do you think are the chances of him actually knowing that thereís a guy called Osama going to be replaced in the intellectual by a guy called Obama?
Alan: I know, I know.† Itís an utter farce, isnít it?
Bazra: Is that a psy-op in itself or what? Is that supposed to be big on peopleís minds or what?
Alan: It is a psy-ops thing in itself. Sure it is. And even the fact that, I mean this Obamaís had about 3 or 4 different names in the past so I guess this is the one that suits for the time. Theyíre always playing psychological gamesÖ
Bazra: If you canít find credible evidence of Osama around get a guy whose name rhymes with Osama and have him in the public domain all the time.
Alan: Of, course. And itís so funny too, because even Osama Bin-Laden literally means the one whoís got the illumedÖ heís the illumined one. Thatís what it means!
Bazra: Really.† And now this other guy, Joe Biden has come in and his name is sort of like Bin-Laden. You know, it reminds youÖ thatís a subtle reminder of Bin-Laden too almost.
Alan: Of course it is. Laden is also Laden. A batteryís proper name is a ďladen jar,Ē thatís how they created the first batteries. I just laugh when I see the names they conjure up for the public or they give families for their role in this particular system. You couldnít dream this stuff up in science fiction. They are what they do and itís just a big, big joke to them at the top that we will actually vote for them.
Bazra: Yeah, I call him Obama-sama!
Alan: The BAM part worries me, mind you. He might use the BAM-ing part of it more. It was the same too when they had the earthquake in BAM in Iran, remember when they were attacking Iraq and they had the earthquake in Iran and it wasÖ
Bazra: Yes, BAM!
Alan: They picked a place called BAM. Well that was HAARP they used to cause the earthquake in the first place.
Bazra: I hear the music, Alan. Nice talking with you.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, where theyíre certainly HAARPing us and spraying us, itís good night and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Transcribed by Diana