Sept. 5, 2013 (#1405)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 5, 2013:
Dead Loss if You Don't Know Who's Boss:
"The Global Dominance Agenda seems Insane
And the U.S. is Set to Take the Blame,
Yet Internationalists Who Own the Nations,
Extremely Wealthy in Money Occupations,
Have used Countries before, Set on Fire
Revolutions Promising the Heart's Desire
Of Freedom, Equality, Liberty, the Con,
They Bind All with a Financial Thong
Of Slavery, Class, Privileges and Debt,
Privatize Government Departments and Yet
While Stomping Naive into the Mud
They Use Military for the Letting of Blood,
This Huge Agenda Requires Sacrifice,
For War is Peace and Other Orwellian Lies"
© Alan Watt Sept. 5, 2013
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 5, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca
|European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:
Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks &
Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September the 5th, 2013. For newcomers, I advise you to make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com; there’s lots of audios for free download. I take you through the system that you’re living through, that you’re born into. It’s a complete system, actually very well worked out. And it should be too because it’s been on the go for an awful long time, well over a hundred years in fact. You’ll find that the big private foundations, the big money boys, set themselves up a long time ago, at the height of the British Empire even; they were based in London, the City of London. They set up private organizations which would be a parallel government, the real government in fact, the ones that controlled all the cash; that’s where the money lies. So they set up foundations, tax-free, tax-exempt foundations to basically give themselves lots of cash to use for think tanks, and with these think tanks they advise with policies for every country across the world, on all their social policies, including military and so on and so on.
They’re still on the go today, these private organizations. Some of them sound very official, like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is a private organization, and its American counterpart the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) – it’s a member of the same organization – to take over the same kind of world Empire, for globalism. They are incredibly powerful indeed. They also hire thousands of NGOs, non-governmental organizations; in fact, they found them and set them up. They lobby governments for all the changes that you’re hearing about today, constantly, constantly advocating these changes to suit the boys at the top. So help yourself to the website.
Remember too, that you can help me tick along here by getting the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com; that’s all there is that I have for sale. You can help me tick along by donating too. To do so go into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can also get on the sites listed there, on that particular site you’ll see a whole bunch of sites, you’ll find they all carry the audios for free download. They all carry transcripts in English for print-up of many of the talks I’ve given over the years. You can get transcripts in other languages if you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. Remember, straight donations are seriously welcome as we go through the planned inflation, which they call quantitative easing these days.
So we’re living through a script, and that’s what folk don’t understand, it’s a script. Remember, I’ve mentioned so many times in the past that Professor Carroll Quigley, who was at one time the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations, this private group of course, that puts their own members into governments as well and the high bureaucratic positions. He was their historian for them and he said basically they’ve been behind all the wars in the last hundred years, and maybe even further back under different names. Basically we’re going through a continuation today of the same system, war after war, all planned well in advance and everything is lined up like ducks in a row, with the same propaganda being used pretty well to take down all the countries that are on the list to be taken down. Of course you’ve got to remember that the PNAC group (Project for the New American Century) back in the 90s published the countries that they wanted to be taken out, and Obama is simply continuing the same agenda in his particular rein, as they call it.
So we’re living through a script. And even the social changes you’re experiencing today are all planned, again, by the private foundations and implemented through all their front men that they have in government and outside of government. So we’re living through their script. Most folk don’t quite get that it’s their script. They’ve planned, too, to not just bring in a global government, but also to bring in an authorized controlled society across the whole planet. That’s the big undertaking that has to be finished this century, because this is what they call, in their own terms, in their own language, ‘the Century of Change’. So they have to finish off all the countries that will not come under the global World Bank system, the Bank for International Settlements, the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and go along with the World Trade Organization. They all have to be plundered, smashed to smithereens if necessary, and brought into the fold and run by the global organization. That’s what’s really happening today.
Most folk at the bottom haven’t a clue because they’re caught up in the day-to-day problems that they encounter, with deindustrialization, jobs all been given to China for instance, as they have been for the last 25 or 30 years almost, all through treaties drawn up, again, by the CFR/Royal Institute of International Affairs. They created the World Trade Organization as well, privately run. They decided to give China all the business and deindustrialize the Western countries. Of course now they’re dealing with all the problems of unemployment, etc. etc. etc. So everything is completely interrelated to do with these private organizations.
The governments never listen to the general public. They never listen to the public. When they don’t get what they want they go back for the vote on whatever it happens to be, whether it’s to join the European Union, in some countries they did it five times in a row. And just using marketing skills they find out who’s not voting, why they’re not voting, how can they sway them to vote, etc. etc, the fear factor, you’ll be left behind, all of this stuff. And they’re using the same techniques of course with the NAFTA agreement, because America is eventually to become the same as the EU with a central parliamentary system. During the free trade negotiations, before NAFTA even came along – that was the precursor, where everything was set up, was in the free trade negotiations – they actually discussed, the US government and Canada and Mexico discussed setting up a Parliament for the Americas in Montréal, of all places, but that’s where they decided to put it if they build one. So they’re still working on this and the integration is still going ahead.
Right now, at this moment of course, we’re all waiting for the list – the list of countries to be taken out, from the 90s, that’s still ongoing – to be continued. And these boys never change their plans. They never do. When the big foundations publish their agendas and what they want to happen, you can take it to the bank; it’s the only bank that really works because they never, ever change their agendas. Now tonight I’ll put up a couple of links to do with – and all the articles that I’ll mention, mind you, I’ll put up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com after the broadcast. But it was back in 2007, for instance, that General Wesley Clark was at the Commonwealth Club of California, and I’ll put the link up for that too and I’ll put also a little video clip up with it as well, where he discusses this.
Wesley Clark ( US 4 Star General ) US will attack 7 countries in 5 years
Wesley Clark , Oct 3 2007 at the commonwealth club of California. (San Francisco California ) http://www.newamericancentury.org/
He openly says that there was a policy coup. ( Donald Rumsfeld , Paul Wolfowitz , Dick Cheney ) - Project for the New American Century.
He stated that they are going to destroy the governments of 7 countries in 5 years. (Alan: ...within 5 years of each other.)
There actually has been more than 7 countries, when Military coups have failed, then there have been military interventions.
So in other words, they bring in first what we call Color Revolutions, where they put in students from all over the world to go and protest within countries that they want to take down or foment revolution. If that doesn’t work then they get their armed mercenaries in afterwards, like is happening in Syria right now. So he discusses all of this on the videos and you can listen to them. There’s two videos of him talking about it, I’ll put them both up tonight for those who want to see it.
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told - youtube.com
But America, really, is the big stick in the world, as we know, because after the Cold War, supposedly, it would be the only country left with the kind of power to finish off the global agenda. We’ll touch on that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. I’m talking about the US’s power basically as the big military power for the world. And it will go down the hill that way too because if you go back into the other globalists, from even back in the 1930s for instance, who taught at Oxford University, you’ll find that some of them wrote lots of books about the world order and the global society they were going to bring in. They talked about the US taking over from Britain as the big stick on the world, military-wise that is too; and it’s pretty well happened. You’ll find that they actually talked about the US eventually failing and how they would get pushed back one or two points and then rally forth again – that’s standard what happens in empires, and they seem to be winning again, but actually, the first time they start to lose anything at all, it’s really a sign of the way; it might take another 50 years for that to happen. But of course that’s the big plan too as we go into a global society. By that time the US will have forced the world into it, or those who run the US or control the US.
But here is from the Jerusalem Post right now to do with Syria and so on. It says…
AIPAC, J Street back separate letters to Obama
jpost.com / HILARY LEILA KRIEGER / 03/20/2013
WASHINGTON – The AIPAC-backed letter by Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) begins by labeling Palestinian unilateral efforts at the UN “unacceptable” . . .
(A: So Palestine, as you know, is getting no recognition from anybody, but they managed to get a little foot in the door when they lobbied at the United Nations themselves. Most folk don’t really care about the Palestinians because they’re kept out of the news as much as possible. But AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee; it’s the most powerful lobbying group, according to Wikipedia, in the country. And Britain’s got one too, their own form of it, so have other countries as well. Very powerful. But it says here that this actual letter by Senator Cardin and Susan Collins was actually backed by AIPAC itself, you see; so they’re spokespeople for them. And there’s the dilemma that the US has, because within the US you have the powerful lobby group that’s there for another country, not for the US. So whose interests, really, are being served here? ...when another country’s being used to go to war to finish off strategies, that’s going to basically benefit a different country altogether? Anyway it says…)
The letter garnered more than 60 signatures, according to AIPAC.
The other letter, which more than 200 J Street supporters from around the country lobbied for during visits to Capitol Hill Tuesday, opens by calling on Obama to reiterate his commitment to both Israel’s security and a two-state solution during his two-day visit, which begins Wednesday.
“It is essential for you to reaffirm on your upcoming trip that finding a pathway to peace remains a priority for your administration,” (A: But at the same time they’re all wanting them to go to war with Syria, on their behalf. I’ll put this up tonight for those who want to read it themselves.) states the letter, sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California).
And also as I’ve said already, that’s one article on AIPAC. Another one says…
AIPAC says they support (A: ...the US...) US strike on Syria
jpost.com / By REUTERS / 09/04/2013
Influential US pro-Israel groups remained quiet on the topic to avoid being seen as rooting for the United States to go to war. (A: This is from, again, the Jerusalem Post.)
WASHINGTON - Three influential pro-Israel groups urged US lawmakers on Tuesday to authorize US President Barack Obama to launch an attack on Syria, signaling a stepped-up lobbying effort for American military action.
The statements by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) represented the groups' most public show of support for US military action since the Aug. 21 attack near Damascus in which Syria's government is accused of using chemical weapons to kill more than 1,400 people.
During the past two weeks, the groups had been unusually quiet as the Obama administration sought to build a case for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad's government.
Supporters of the groups and government sources acknowledged that the groups had made it known that they supported US action. But, the sources said, the groups generally want the debate to focus on US national security rather than how a decision to attack Syria might help Israel (A: In other words, they want the US to take all the blame for it, for their benefit really. And I’ll put this up today as well.). . .
So it isn’t straightforward as you well know. Nothing really is. You have within the US a big powerful, powerful Military-Industrial Complex but you also have people from other countries, or who see another country as their own, not the US so much, and they’re using that too for their own interests.
Also this article too, is from the Times of Israel...
Israeli policy statement supports Obama on Syria
timesofisrael.com / Rebecca Shimoni Stoil / September 4, 2013
WASHINGTON — As Congress began to debate US military involvement in Syria, Israel’s Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren released Israel’s first official position statement on the subject Tuesday night. At a subsequent event, he dismissed those critics who argue that the US should not retaliate for the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons because it would put Israel in danger.
Shortly after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee concluded a lengthy session debating the approval of a retaliatory strike, Oren released an official statement in which he said that “Israel agrees with President Obama that the use of chemical weapons is a ‘heinous act’ (A: Well they all do that, when they’re not using it themselves.) for which the Assad regime must be held accountable and for which there must be ‘international consequences.’ Israel further agrees with the President that the use of chemical weapons promotes the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (A: ...where have you heard that before?) and encourages ‘governments who would choose to build nuclear arms.’” (A: They are meaning Iran, because they want Iran to be taken out too.)
New York Times 'Airbrushes Details of Hawkish Israeli Stance' on Syria after Aipac Pressure
ibtimes.co.uk / Timur Moon / September 4, 2013
(A: That’s from the International Business Times and it says…)
Powerful Israel lobby group in Washington accused of encouraging self-censorship of Syria reprisal report.
The New York Times has come under fire for "self-censoring" its own reporting on the Syria crisis after pressure from Israel's powerful lobbying group in Washington, the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (Aipac). (A: That’s AIPAC again. That’s a powerful group; it can literally run your propaganda in your own country.)
The newspaper ran a news story on 2 September outlining President Obama's efforts to secure congressional backing for military intervention in Syria, in which it broached the sensitive issue of Israel's position on the possibility of imminent air strikes.
The report detailed the president's meetings with influential senators and members of Congress, and with committees including the Senate Armed Forces Committee, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before moving on to Aipac and its agenda.
It quoted one unidentified administration official who described Aipac as "the 800-pound gorilla in the room". (A: Don’t you think the people themselves, everybody should get a vote if you’re going to be involved in a war? But you don’t, do you? But when you have these powerful lobby groups, that can make or break any Senator or Congressman, what are you going to do about that? There’s a conflict here.)
And also this article too, it’s from Pravda in fact and it says…
Syria: The case against Assad
english.pravda.ru / 03.09.2013
The apparent desperation of those who support the Syrian "opposition", insinuating that the Syrian Government used chemical weaponry without a shred of evidence, using photographs to prove the case, taken in Iraq in 2003, using dodgy proof from the King of Spin, the BBC, spells out a sorry story similar to those of Libya and Iraq. (A: And it’s true enough, they’re all much the same aren’t they? It’s not a bad article too. It goes through some of the history of this, that everybody’s forgetting about too because you’re always caught up in the now; and that’s what the media tries to do, they don’t want you to think back and put things together. So it’s not a bad article at all. I’ll put that up tonight as well.)
Also from Pravda it says…
The price of dignity (part two): The destruction of Libya
english.pravda.ru / 03.09.2013
It’s quite a good article in fact. It goes through the history of Libya and the Western interference it’s had, since it was created basically, all after oil and the minerals and all the rest of it they had there too; not just one country but many countries have been trying that afterwards. But it’s a good history, which is kind of omitted in the present time that we live in.
And also from Wikipedia too, it talks about the American Israel Public Affairs Committee; and it’s good, it’s not too bad actually, for Wikipedia. But it talks about…
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is a lobbying group that advocates pro-Israel policies to the Congress and Executive Branch of the United States. (A: Is that anywhere in the Constitution at all, folks?) The current President of AIPAC is Michael Kassen from Westport, Connecticut.
Describing itself as "America's Pro-Israel Lobby", AIPAC is a mass-membership, American organization whose members include Democrats, Republicans, and independents. The New York Times has called it "the most important organization affecting America's relationship with Israel." (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about AIPAC and its influence on American policy. And from Wikipedia it says that it’s…
. . . a mass-membership, American organization whose members include Democrats, Republicans, and independents. The New York Times has called it "the most important organization affecting America's relationship with Israel." It has been described as one of the most powerful lobbying groups in Washington, DC. Its critics have stated it acts as an agent of the Israeli government with a "stranglehold" on the United States Congress with its power and influence. (A: Then it goes on to talk about…)
In 2005, a Pentagon analyst pleaded guilty to charges of passing US government secrets to two AIPAC staffers in what is known as the AIPAC espionage scandal. Both staffers were later fired by AIPAC. In 2009 all charges against the former AIPAC employees were dropped. (A: They actually do that, many times. They’re even still doing it for, I think, Pollard who’s still in prison in the US for passing secrets to Israel. But they just keep lobbying to get them off, off the hook. And they have a lot of power to get it done too. And it’s a good history it gives you too on Wikipedia. It tells you how old the actual committee was and so on. But it goes into its aims and activities and how they actually can make or break, as I say, Congressmen, because everyone’s dependent on donations. It says here…)
The Washington Post states that AIPAC's "web site, which details how members of Congress voted on AIPAC's key issues, and the AIPAC Insider, a glossy periodical that handicaps close political races, are scrutinized by thousands of potential donors. Pro-Israel interests have contributed $56.8 million in individual, group, and soft money donations to federal candidates and party committees since 1990, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics. Between the 2000 and the 2004 elections, the 50 members of AIPAC's board donated an average of $72,000 each to campaigns and political action committees." (A: So they can really make and break, and it actually says, Democrats or Republicans who are running for Congress. And it mentions that in this article as well. So there’s definitely a conflict within the US. I think the world is aware of it too. And definitely this is all going along, with these wars, with Israel’s policies as well. Because they had the same articles of the countries to be taken out when George Bush Junior was in; and it tallied with the PNAC group then as well.)
Also the article I’ll put up tonight too is called, The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told, as I said before. That’s a YouTube one and you can hear how old this agenda is.
Also from Global Research in Canada it says…
“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
globalresearch.ca / Israel Shahak / August 26, 2013
Introduction by Michel Chossudovsky
The Infamous "Oded Yinon Plan". (A: This is what they call it.)
The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment.
According to the founding father of Zionism (A: ...who is...) Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.” (A: As well. And that has been mentioned, that, by different leaders of Israel over the years. So that’s another thing to keep in mind with all these wars that are going on.)
Now, it says Russian children now, as America exports some strange philosophy across the world because it’s now called ‘progressive’, it says…
Russian children get [same gender] love books from the West
english.pravda.ru / 04.09.2013
Representatives of the LGBT community like to point out that remarkably creative people are abundant in their community. This is a correct statement, considering the level of creativity with which the idea of homosexuality is promoted and propagated among children in the Russian hinterland by some publishers. This is evidenced by a scandalous story that recently took place in Vladimir.
Another "book" scandal erupted in Vladimir, Russia. Local Ombudsman for Children Gennady Prokhorychev came across children's literature of a very specific nature in a local bookstore. Formally, the book was one of the many "encyclopedias" (A: ...that’s what they call them…) on the burning topic of sex and where [children] come from. (A: If you go through the history, by the way, of the printing press, and the various revolutions throughout Europe, they all had a lot of ties to today in fact. You can find that the same kind of characters were putting out the same kind of books back then, to try to destroy the cultures across Europe, in order to change it. And some of them called themselves the Encyclopedists, the group that they formed at the time, to change the cultures of the actual people who would oppose them.)
Also as we go through this nonsense of war, war, war, which also covers a lot of things that are happening domestically, and to other countries across the world, because it hides a lot of things that are going on right now. But it says…
Israel missile test amid fear of Syria escalation
bbc.co.uk / 3 September 2013
Israel has carried out a joint missile test with the US in the Mediterranean, amid heightened tension over possible Western military strikes on Syria.
The test came as the US Congress prepared for its first public hearing on a possible military response to alleged chemical weapons use by Syria.
Earlier, the UN confirmed that more than two million Syrians were now refugees from the 30-month conflict.
More Syrians were now displaced than any other nationality, it said.
A senior Israeli defence official confirmed to the BBC that a missile had been fired on Tuesday to test its defence systems. (A: It says too, it was fired towards the direction of Syria in fact as well. You couldn’t really get the saber rattling going as much as it’s going on right now, by the ones who want it all to happen, eh.)
And as things are going on across the world too, don’t forget that you’re involved. And this is the whole thing too, as governments try to… In fact, I don’t like the name that governments use when they want to go to war. It’s like, Britain has decided, or, the US has decided, and so on and so on. No one’s ever, ever asked their opinion on anything, the vast majority. That’s why they call them the silent majority; you have no say in anything. In fact, you’re kept out of the say as much as possible. You’re trained that way, not to participate in having any power at all. Leave it to the experts. Leave it to all the specialists above you, that come out of special wombs and so on, and you just play yourselves – that’s what you’re told to do, that’s why you get so much entertainment.
We’ve touched on this particular character many times before, because of his shady past. It says…
Obama ‘science diplomat’ advocated for population control
(A: ...and you can guess who it is of course.)
dailycaller.com / 09/04/2013 / Michael Bastasch
The Obama administration has been engaging in “science diplomacy” (A: ...it’s called. Very Orwellian, again, eh. Science… It’s all called science today. Remember, the global society wants experts to rule us all, and various government agencies to decide everything about us, even if you can breed in the future or not. And I’m not kidding about that.) by sending out its top science adviser to visit foreign dignitaries. (A: So exporting, again. It’s not just porn and so on that they’re exporting from the US, it’s also this.)
But John Holdren (A: ...John Holdren, again…), director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Obama official engaged in this jet-setting, has expressed controversial views about government-imposed population controls.
The Guardian reports that Holdren regularly meets with top scientists from other countries such as Brazil, Russia, China and Japan as a new way “to reach out to bridge cultural and economic gaps between the United States and the rest of the world.”
Holdren has previously stated that the United States and the rest of the world have too many people, (A: What they really mean is the wrong people actually, folks. They don’t need us all anymore, you see. Because they’ve set up most of the manufacturing for everything in China, for instance, and they don’t need the old people anymore, the old-style human, because there’s no work for most of them. And there’s even less work in the future; they know that too. Anyway, he’s going on about the population bomb and so on and so on…) a population bomb that technology can’t defuse.
“Dr. Holdren has a record only surpassed by his longtime collaborator Paul Ehrlich for spreading misinformation and making failed predictions,” Myron Ebell, director of international energy and global warming policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
“In addition, Dr. Holdren has advocated a wide array of despicable policies, such as mandatory population control, and was a willing stooge of the Soviet Union as a member for several decades of the Pugwash Conference (and of which he was chairman when it was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995),” Ebell added. “John Holdren is therefore the perfect “science diplomat” for an administration that peddles junk science and supports policies that will make poor people, and especially poor people in poor countries, poorer. As President Obama’s science diplomat, he can now advocate for global impoverishment on a global stage.”
Testifying before the Senate in 1974, Holdren and fellow scientist and population control advocate Paul Ehrlich argued that the world was moving towards a no-growth economy because of overpopulation and technology would not be able to mitigate the problem.
“We are going to move to a no-growth [economy],” Ehrlich said. (A: See, everything’s planned way ahead, folks. It’s all planned way, way ahead, long before Ehrlich even came along too.) “Now, whether we do it intelligently through the Government by planning as rapidly as possible, or whether we move there automatically-by the way, when I look at some of the figures these days, I think we’re moving there much more rapidly than people realize–we’re going to get there, obviously.” (A: He said. The only problem is, when is the government going to take ALL responsibility for everything that we do? ...everything we do, individually. Back with more after this.)
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about Mr Holdren and Paul Ehrlich and how it’s still going on today, a very old agenda, as I say. Because a hundred years ago the big boys at the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Royal Society were talking about the same agenda then, what will we do after the industrial revolution starts to slow down and so on, and after we’ve got all these wars through, and we’ve got the global society, etc., how do we train the public? What do we do with them then? We bring down the populations and create institutional changes, these kind of things. Now it says here…
One such collaboration [between Ehrlich and Holdren] was an essay entitled “Population and Panaceas: A Technological Perspective” from 1969 that argued “man’s present technology is inadequate to the task of maintaining the world’s burgeoning billions, even under the most optimistic assumptions.” (A: Now the fact is, in most first world countries the populations have been plummeting; even the United Nations admits that. And the countries are going along with a policy of mass immigration, to not only keep the populations up, but also to bring in a global society. In fact, these wars, by the way, are part of it. Where do you think all these refugees end up going? That’s a big, big part of it, folks. Destroy the existing cultures for a global society. It’s all been discussed.)
Holdren and Ehrlich further argue that technological advancements to increase food supplies would be fruitless until “the population growth rate drastically reduced.”
“No effort to expand the carrying capacity of the Earth can keep pace with unbridled population growth,” they wrote. (A: That was back then.)
Holdren was heavily criticized after being tapped by President Obama in 2009 for being an author in a textbook that floated such ideas as forced abortions, putting sterilants in the drinking water and government-mandated family planning. (A: ...that’s forced abortion and so on and sterilization. This is what’s in the US government, folks, the ones that are bringing ‘progressiveness’ to the world, and everything else along with it.)
One passage of the textbook even argued that such coercive population control methods could even be constitutional.
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society,” Holdren and Ehrlich wrote. “Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.” (A: But he’s still up there as the Science Czar, isn’t he?)
Holdren’s office denied the doctor supported coercive approaches to controlling the population. (A: He does that right now, but it’s all documented in the books that they put out.)
“Dr. Holdren has stated flatly that he does not now support and has never supported compulsory abortions, (A: Well, he’s a good liar, that’s why he’s in government, because it was in his books.)
Anyway, this is what they put out for you, and these are the guys who are supposedly running the countries. Remember, you don’t have countries anymore. That’s what Van Rompuy said, the guy who was appointed as the head of the EU Parliament. He says, the nation-state is obsolete. I read the article on the air at the time; go into the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and read it for yourselves. See, people think, they always think, as I say, when you get pushed to go to wars and so on, that you’re still a nation. No, you’re not. No you’re not. You’re run by a small clique, a minority of people, and the whole world is like that now, with an internationalist agenda. It’s been like that for a hundred years. And so you don’t have what you think is your own country with its own customs and so on. That’s why they’re always changing... you’re progressive... You’re going through the agenda, folks.
And as all this is happening too it says…
Pandemic of pension woes is plaguing the nation
cnbc.com / 5 Aug 2013 / John W. Schoen
Across the nation, cities and states are watching Detroit's largest-ever municipal bankruptcy filing with great trepidation. Years of underfunded retirement promises to public sector workers (A: ...that’s what you get in the big socialist society, is so many folk working for government, right down to the bottom.), which helped lay Detroit low, could plunge them into a similar and terrifying financial hole.
A CNBC.com analysis of more than 120 of the nation's largest state and local pension plans finds they face a wide range of burdens as their aging workforces near retirement. (A: See, they’ve never had old folks before. You understand how things are written, people? They’ve never... The population boom, they never had people born before, until the 1950s apparently. And my goodness, they’re going to get old one day; folk apparently never got old before that. And a lot of them didn’t, actually; they were starved to death, or forced to work 16 hours a day sort of thing.)
Thanks to a patchwork of accounting practices and rosy investment assumptions, it's not even clear just how big a financial hole many states and cities have dug for themselves. That may soon change, thanks to a new set of government accounting standards that could serve as a nasty wake-up call to states and cities relying on rosy scenarios and head-in-the-sand accounting.
What it boils down to, it’s not just in the US. It’s the same – understand, we’re global. Every country is doing what every other country is doing, because they all get orders from the same internationalists. It’s been that way for a long, long time. And they’re going to plunder the pensions; actually, they’ve been spending them all along anyway. And they’re going to bring us all down into austerity; that’s part of the big plan. Austerity, you understand, where every penny you have will go to basic survival, for food, water, all owned by private internationalists, and it will go for your energy as well, to the energy corporations. That’s where your money is to go, all your extra spending money; there will be no more extra spending money.
Major Pharmaceutical Company Wants To Block Access
To Clinical Trial Data Of Their Drugs In Fear of Profit Loss
(A: It’s quite an article actually, but it talks about...)
collective-evolution.com / September 4, 2013 / Lisa Bloomquist
AbbVie (recently split off from Abbott Laboratories), maker of Humira, and InterMune, maker of Esbriet, have filed a lawsuit against the European Medicines Agency (the European equivalent of the FDA) to block access to clinical trial data on the benefits and harms of their drugs, claiming that these vital facts are “trade secrets” whose release would harm their profits. (A: It would also harm the people that take them, according to this article.) Medical researches have been denied [access] to clinical trial information.
Of course, when a drug causes cancer, release of clinical data information could potentially harm the profits of the company that makes it. Humira, a drug that is quickly becoming one of the best-selling drugs in the world, mainly because of the marketing techniques used by AbbVie, causes cancer.
(A: And it gives you one of their ads to watch if you want to watch it.) Here’s one of their ads – don’t forget to feel bad about your plaque psoriasis.
The FDA warning label on Humira warns of increased risk of “Lymphoma and other malignancies” including “a rare type of cancer called hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma” that “often results in death,” along with “increased risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, including tuberculosis (TB) (A: ...it opens you up to tuberculosis infection…), bacterial sepsis, invasive fungal infections (such as histoplasmosis) and infections due to other opportunistic pathogens.” Since the FDA is pretty slow on the uptake of actually putting adverse effects of drugs on their warning labels, (A: This author says…) I’ll mention that, in addition to Lymphoma, TB and other infections, Humira is also linked to the following:
Leukemia, Skin Cancer, Candidiasis, Kaposi’s Sarcoma, Histoplasmosis Cryptosporidium
All of which can lead to death.
No wonder AbbVie wants to hide their data from their clinical trials. (A: [Alan chuckles.] No kidding eh? [Alan chuckles.])
And it’s true enough, you know, marketing can sell you anything, folks. It can sell you anything. And of course except the side effects, and you’re supposed to just simply overlook that.... oh one in so many will get something nasty happening, perhaps. That’s what your doctor’s told, because the American Medical Association was all set up by the Rockefellers, remember, including what the doctors will be taught. And that’s still the same today.
Also, I’ve mentioned this before, Natural Capital Declaration...
Natural Capital Declaration announces new signatories and supporters as implementation begins
(A: I read the article the other day on the air to do with Agenda 21 and how everything is being privatized, etc. too, to save the world and save the earth, etc. But now the big Rothschild boys, that started up the green banks – for those who don’t know about it, look into green banks; it was Rothschild who put it forward, and all the little banks that you see are actually subsidiaries of his own bank – and they’re putting out natural capital. It says…)
7 June 2013, Oxford, UK and Geneva, Switzerland: The Natural Capital Declaration (NCD) has announced two new signatories and three new supporters: FMO, First Green Bank, TEEB for Business Coalition, Trucost and the Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia (ASrIA).
The NCD, a finance-led initiative committing banks, investors and insurers to integrating natural capital considerations in financial products and services, was launched at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in June 2012.
Earlier this week, the NCD announced the start of a new ‘Roadmap’ phase, which aims to turn these commitments into reality through a programme of work by four working groups, each led by a bank. (A: ...the same boys that run and own and set up the Royal Institute of International Affairs, folks. It’s quite something. See, they’re going to own the air itself, and you’re going to pay for every little bit of pollution, including your CO2 and so on, as they make trillions of bucks off you in the process ...to save the earth of course. What a great con that one is.)
Banks plan valuation of 'natural capital' - wired.co.uk / 31 August 13 / Duncan Geere
Can the World Banks' Green Bonds Become a Scalable Climate Solution? - theenergycollective.com / September 2, 2013
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Wesley Clark----'US will Attack 7 Countries in 5 Years'
The Syrian War What You're Not Being Told
AIPAC Supports US Strike in Syria
AIPAC, J Street back separate letters to Obama
AIPAC on US -Syria
AIPAC - American Israel Public Affairs Committee
Israeli policy statement supports Obama on Syria (Sept. 5, 2013, Times of Israel)
New York Times 'airbrushes details of hawkish Israeli stance' on Syria after AIPAC press (Sept. 4, 2013, Int'l Business Times, UK)
How White House push to Jews spurred shift on Syria (Sept. 4, 2013, Jewish Daily Forward)
The Case Against Syria
The Destruction of Libya
Obama to step on Hitler's path?
Greater Israel Plan
Russian children get gay love books from the West
Israel Missile Test
Holdren Pushing for Population Control
Pandemic of pension woes is plaguing the nation
Pharma Company Wants to Block Access to Clinical Trial Data of One of Their Drugs
Nature Capital Declaration
Valuation of "Natural Capital" for Agenda 21
Can the World Banks' Green Bonds Become a Scalable Climate Solution?
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"