March 22, 2013 (#1293)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:


Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 22, 2013:

Orwell Put the Plan in "The Last Man":

"The New Opinion Program is Surely Here,
And Taboo Own-Thought Guarded by Fear
Of Government-Mandated "Personal" Opinions
To Be Forced by Law Upon the Minions,
Backed by Psychiatry's Bible, DSM-5,
All Logic and Reason to Be Flayed Alive,
For Reality is Whatever Big Brother States,
Contrary Opinions Come from Those Who Hate,
So Put Reason, Logic, Fact Aside
And by Authorized Opinion You Must Bide"
© Alan Watt March 22, 2013


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 22, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 22nd of March, 2013.  For newcomers, I always suggest you make good use of the website and you’ll find this big system in there and how it works, how it started up and where it’s all going to go. Everything’s managed by intelligentsia basically, big foundations that are tax-free.  They have trillions of dollars.  They pretend they’re philanthropic of course, and they push all the radical agendas, and they have done for a hundred years. They are the parallel government. They put their own members in to government in fact, and bureaucracies too, across the world. Bureaucrats are very important because they know their agendas.  They’re put in there for life, until they retire, and they can get a lot done in there. It’s much, much better than the political guys that come and go.


So anyway, help yourself to that. You’ll find out why the system is the way it is, where it’s all going, why things are happening today that you just don’t understand, that seem crazy in fact. But you understand, you’re living through a new world order, the Century of Change and all that stuff, Agenda 21 from the United Nations, ALL manifestations of ideas that were planted a long, long time ago to bring in this controlled society, by the intelligentsia, working on behalf of the big, big international banking boys, the economists, that decided that they have the right to rule the world, and always did because they were the only ones who really started doing statistics in the first place a long, long time ago, and managing the world’s economies, and countries’ economies, and the wars and all the rest of it. So, that’s where you are today.


It’s the open secret, as HG Wells called it, because he actually wrote about that.  He called it The Open Conspiracy; you should look it up and read it. Everything is published, it’s just that the general public don’t get wind of it because it ends up in books that end up in the library, very dusty old books that are never read. They do legally tell you where they’re taking you, and you acquiesce to it by your silence. That’s a legality. Most things are done by that very method. You simply say, oh well I don’t understand that, and it’s out of your head.  But you said nothing, you didn’t complain, therefore you accepted by your silence. So as I say help yourself to the website.


Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you so you can keep me ticking along here, hopefully, maybe, if you can buy the books and discs at or donate.  [Order and donation options listed above.]  Straight donations are seriously, seriously welcome as we go through austerity and hyperinflation and all the other planned things to bring you into a post consumerist society, because that’s what it’s all about. Everything’s happening on cue, the way that it was designed to do, and at the same time they’re changing lots of other things too. All normalcies have to be destroyed, you understand, according to the Frankfurt School, and that’s exactly what’s happening today. All normalcies that kept the old systems going, the old cultures vibrant and alive and pretty safe, have to be destroyed to make room for the dominant minority that took over, and it’s manifest, in your face today, under the guise of science of course. Science of course is the technique, where you can’t argue with science, even though we’re watching global warming getting pushed and pushed and pushed as we freeze our butts off at home. So are you going to believe the science, or your lying eyes or your shivering skin? It’s up to you. 


So as I say, help yourself to the website. Really, you should start downloading stuff too because you don’t know how long it’s going to last with all the laws getting pushed out, with those that are authorized to be out there and the ones who are not, because that’s the big censorship. It’s been passed in Britain and other countries and it will be across the board within a week or two, I’m sure, as all the so-called British Commonwealth countries follow suit. Australia’s already doing it and Britain has passed it all. Even the regular media, which of course has always been on board with the big agenda, is now censoring their personal opinions about particular people in politics, stuff like that. So expect more trivia for your mainstream news. Back with more after this break.


Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the big system.  And you think, of course, all you get, really, you can’t really think about things… Most folk don’t really think about the news they’re given. I’ve talked about articles over the years and read from articles and studies they’ve done at universities and so on, over how people really think. Because we are the most studied creature on the planet; we always have been, for thousands of years. Not the animals or how ants have sex or anything like that. It’s all about people. Because after all, you have to manage the people first before you can manage anything else.  And believe you me, we’re the most studied and the most managed creature on the planet.


And more so today because as I say, I’ve gone into the history of what was often called socialism – before that it was Marxism and then it was called socialism. And the whole intent of socialism, and what surprised me too was how it got off the ground in Marxism too, with multimillionaires and international bankers financing it all. That should give you a clue as to the fact that the whole idea of Marxism was a front for something else, and the same with socialism too. But of course you must get the mob, or the people, to back you up and be all for you, by hitting things that are actually true. Like, why is the government keeping certain amounts of people in poverty and things like that. So they use real things to get laws passed that don’t end up helping the people at all. It ends up simply bringing the newcomers in that take over and dominate you all; that’s what it’s all about.  Because dominant minorities have always been here.  Aldous Huxley talked about them. He says, he didn’t see why there wouldn’t always be a dominant minority, might not always be the same one because there’s different rivalries going on down through history. But today it seems to be consolidated into one dominant minority that runs everything.  And of course they use the guise of science to run everything today, as I said before.


I’ve gone through the history of the Frankfurt School that really came out of Germany. The guys fled from Germany when the Nazis got in and they set up in the States. Their whole idea was to take over, after studying the culture of America and saying they didn’t like it very much, that they would alter it all. And they got permission to do so by the President of the US at the end of World War II. Their idea was to change the culture so much that Nazism couldn’t possibly arise in the US – that was the excuse that was given; it was an excuse – but also Britain and elsewhere. They used the United Nations to get their agendas through. They had many, many front organizations working with them and the big foundations financing them and working with them to make all this happen.


Now, here’s a partial truth, that they put out sometimes in different papers. It says…


The Sordid Origin of Hate-Speech Laws / December 1, 2011 /  Jacob Mchangama


All western European countries have hate-speech laws. In 2008, the EU (Alan:  European Union, parliament.) adopted a framework decision on “Combating Racism and Xenophobia” that obliged all member states to criminalize certain forms of hate speech. (A:  Now remember, xenophobia is something which is… anthropologists use the term all the time, and so do historians, as they go down through the cultures and the different countries and so on, that specifically like their own culture and don’t like any outsiders. Certain cultures are very collectivist, other ones are individualistic. Say America for instance, and Europe, were more individualistic cultures. You might belong to a culture but most folk worked individually, even in their businesses and so on; they didn’t form massive combines; it was unlikely for them to do it. But certain other people do, and other cultures do form massive combinations and of course they naturally take over and dominate individualistic cultures, with their ability to accumulate incredible money and work together.)  . . . that obliged all member states to criminalize certain forms of hate speech. On the other side of the Atlantic, the Supreme Court of the United States has gradually increased and consolidated the protection of hate speech under the First Amendment. (A:  Now, it doesn’t tell you the groups that brought forth the idea and kept it going, on hate speech.  You have to go through the history of it; you’ll find it up there if you do a search on hate speech and its foundations and so on, and different ones that were passed by whom.) The European concept of freedom of expression thus prohibits certain content and viewpoints, whereas, with certain exceptions, the American concept is generally concerned solely with direct incitement likely to result in overt acts of lawlessness. (A:  So in other words, turning people against a particular group or whatever in an act of violence. So it’s two different kinds here. The US basically bans any kind of contradiction to the political correctness of the new Soviet, which is really what the EU is. And actually America has turned into the same thing, really. And this article originally is from 2011.) 


Yet the origin of hate-speech laws has been largely forgotten. (A:  Now, there’s a partial truth going to be told here. It says…) The divergence between the United States and European countries is of comparatively recent origin. In fact, the United States and the vast majority of European (and Western) states were originally opposed to the internationalization of hate-speech laws. (A:  Now again, the US, as I say, and Europe, were individualistic cultures, remember. Meaning, you might belong to a culture and a country but people worked… you didn’t have so many obligations to be a collective and a collective idea, with the same opinion on everything.) European states and the U.S. shared the view that human rights should protect rather than limit freedom of expression.  (A:  After all, if you start limiting it you’re under totalitarianism and tyranny. And you are. You always will be; that’s how it’s always been, when you bring in hate laws. Because very powerful organizations, VERY powerful organizations and totalitarian organizations have done this in the past. They take over and they’ll tell you that up is down and down is up, and you better repeat it or else you’re in the slammer. Very simple.)


Rather, the introduction of hate-speech prohibitions into international law was championed in its heyday by the Soviet Union and allies. (A:  So there’s a partial truth. Because in the US and elsewhere it was people who were more than just ‘fellow travelers’ with the Soviet system; they actually had even members of the family running the Soviet Union, in the Politburo, many of them.) Their motive was readily apparent.  The communist countries sought to exploit such laws to limit free speech.  (A:  So you couldn’t complain about communism, you see, and the Soviet system.)


As Americans, Europeans and others contemplate the dividing line emerging on the extent to which free speech should be limited to criminalize the “defamation of religions” and “Islamophobia,” launched by the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (oic) since 1999, they should bear this forgotten history in mind. However well-intended—and its initial proponents were anything but well-intended (A:  And that’s true. Remember, the whole idea of hate speech and the prohibition of saying anything and limiting free speech came out of the Soviet Union and those allies that worked with it, inside all your governments and your countries, very powerful people too, and wealthy.) —the Western acceptance of hate-speech laws severely limits the ability of liberal democracies to counter attempts to broaden the scope of hate-speech laws under international human rights law, with potentially devastating consequences for the preservation of free speech.


Freedom of expression and hate speech


The (nonbinding) universal Declaration of Human Rights (udhr) (A:  ...again, out of the United Nations, right.) adopted in 1948 does not include an explicit duty to prohibit hate speech. Article 19 simply secures “freedom of opinion and expression.” (A:  ...that’s most important.) However, the drafting history shows that the issues of hate-speech regulation and restrictions on free speech were frequently discussed. During the negotiation of Article 19, the drafters faced the challenge of whether, and if so to what extent, freedom of expression should tolerate even intolerance. The majority of states favored a robust protection of free speech such as that set out in a U.S. proposal (un Doc. e/cn. 4/21), which read “there shall be freedom of speech, of the press and of expression by any means whatsoever.” However, the Soviet Union continuously proposed various amendments aimed at prohibiting expressions of intolerance.


The first UK proposal on the wording of an article aimed at securing freedom of expression recognized, like the Soviet proposal, the possibility for states to limit this right, in the interests of national security, against incitement to violence and disorder and obscene publications, whereas the UK proposal expressed doubts about the possibility of including publications aimed at suppressing human rights. But the UK did recognize a danger that “these words would afford a wider power for the limitation of freedom of publication than is necessary or desirable,” they found “that it would be inconsistent for a Bill of Rights whose whole object is to establish human rights and fundamental freedoms to prevent any Government, if it wished to do so, from taking steps against publications whose whole object was to destroy the rights and freedoms which it is the purpose of the Bill to establish.”  (A:  You understand how they can literally use any law to turn it against you in fact?)


At first glance this proposal may seem wholly reconcilable with the efforts of the Soviet Union. Yet two elements of the UK position differed crucially from the Soviet one. First, the UK stated that “the right of Governments to impose the necessary restrictions . . . is to be interpreted as strictly confined to such publications as advocate the use of violence,” and second, that “no Government is obliged by the Bill to make use of the powers of limitation.” In other words, the limitations on free speech advocated by the UK were, first, with a few exceptions, dependent on the advocacy of violence, and thus mere expressions of intolerance would not in themselves be punishable, and, second, held that there should be no human rights obligation to prohibit such expression. 


Now, all this stuff is a partial truth. It doesn’t go into the organizations in the US and in Britain that pushed, it was always at the forefront, to limit freedom of speech. And also too, as I mentioned yesterday and I’ll put it up again tonight, about the laws to do with the Leveson inquiry and the Leveson Bill that went through Britain there, that’s going to prohibit a lot of… even personal opinions from reporters on any article that they’re actually reading whatsoever, or writing about. So it’s all changed ONCE AGAIN. You understand, you’re going under tyranny step-by-step and this is the last straw, really. You’ll notice too, as Orwell said, some people have more freedoms and rights in such utopias, etc., some are more equal than others, when it comes to who can say what and who can’t. It’s very, very important to understand.


Press regulation deal sparks fears of high libel fines for bloggers - / 19 March 2013


Now, getting back to the Frankfurt School and so on, it says here that there’s a petition.  Now, psychiatry, before I get into the petitions about psychiatry, you’ve got to remember that psychiatry was launched by the same people who backed up Marxism and communism, as a technique under the guise of science to start altering the people’s opinions and so on, and make them subject… subject to a new profession that would have authority in law. Because law always asks scientists what they think now, you’ll notice, about anything at all. It’s very important you understand this. I’ll be back with more; I think that’s the music there.


Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the system and where it’s going and how it got here. And going through too, about how, from the Soviet era, even before it was the Soviet there were groups pushing and coming forward to try and invent something which would be regarded as a science. I’ve gone through the history of Freud and others that came after him, and even of course on a few occasions too – go into the archives section at, you’ll find all the articles I read on Bernays (that was a nephew of Freud) who came up with how to create the new consumer society for America, and then worked, even before he died, on the post-consumer society, for America and for the West. It’s all related. It’s all related to that, and communism, and to hate speech and so on.


Because in Russia, remember, in the Soviet system if you criticized anything in the Soviet system at all or even articles that you read, put out as propaganda, you were classed as mentally insane. And literally that was it; you were whisked off to the psychiatric loony bin, because you had to be insane to criticize such a utopia. Literally, that’s how simple the justification went. And you have the same people, a lot of the same people that were dedicated, diehard Soviet types, and communist types, socialism types, running the world today, on behalf of their Masters who run the capitalist system, for those who haven’t figured it out.


As I say, the Frankfurt School was one of their main ones. They brought lots of guys over from Eastern Europe during the 30s and put them straight into universities across America and elsewhere. They were vouched for by existing fellow travelers in the US and Britain and elsewhere. And they got professorships even though they weren’t qualified for them, and they brought in all of this new socialist ideas, under the guise of science, social studies and all the rest of it. And here we are today. 


Anyway, this is all linked together because psychiatry as I say was to be one of their main scientific techniques to reign in the opinions, and the attitudes, and the behavior of everyone across the world. They had to be remade, because the Frankfurt School said that anyone who criticized being taken over, by another group, this other group, were actually insane. That’s why they launched psychiatry, if you didn’t know the history of it. That’s why Freud said when they were approaching on the boat to New York Harbor, he said, we’re bringing in a plague to America.  Psychiatry was to be a plague.  And so much can be done under the guise of psychiatry. 


Now, the DSM, the big manual, the Bible of psychiatry has just been updated again. Very important stuff. I’ll start off with a petition against the DSM-5 that’s being launched now. This petition is from Britain; there’s a couple of them going on in the States as well.


Petition against DSM-5 is launched in Britain /  20/03/2013


A group of British mental health professionals has issued a statement of concern about the Reliability, Validity, and Safety of DSM-5. The publication of the statement is reported in The Times this morning.


The concerns the professionals list are that DSM-5:


• includes many diagnostic categories with questionable reliability, which may lead to misleading assumptions about their scientific validity; (A:  Now, this is the Bible… And remember, all the lawyers are using this now, all the judges are using this stuff, and whatever the psychiatrist says is the law, folks. They’ve got murderers off under the guise of using neuroscience, which is a form of psychiatry, if you don’t know. Also it...)


• did not receive a much-needed and widely requested external scientific review;  (A:  No, they rammed it through. Because you see, it’s for social change; that’s what it’s for.)


• may compromise patient safety through the implementation of lowered diagnostic thresholds and the introduction of new diagnostic categories that do not have sufficient empirical backing; (A: They’ve been made up, for political purposes.)


• may result in the mislabeling of mental illness in people who would fare better without a psychiatric diagnosis;  (A:  because there’s a wide variety of personalities in the world, and that are not classified as insane.  At least at the moment. Maybe it’s changed now.)


• may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful treatment, particularly with psychiatric medication; (A:  ...because that’s all psychiatry does now, is just dish out drugs, on behalf of their Masters, and the big boys that run the big Pharma industries are in cahoots with the big banking boys, who also backed psychiatry.)


• may divert precious mental health resources away from those who most need them.


The Stop the Insanity website, which publishes the statement, also invites readers to sign a petition. This calls on clinicians, researchers, journal editors, healthcare planners, managers and commissioners, the pharmaceutical industry (A:  ...forget that.) and the media to avoid use of DSM-5 wherever possible until these concerns have been resolved.


(A:  And it gives a history about the British Psychological Society…)

In December 2011 the British Psychological Society expressed its own concerns about DSM-5.


Now, the next article is about this, it says…


Psychiatry’s New Normal: ‘Transgendered’ Persons / JIM GRAVES   / 03/22/2013


(A:  See, understand, psychiatry has a different purpose. It’s a political/social engineering tool by those who know how to use it.)


The American Psychiatric Association drops ‘Gender Identity Disorder’ from its official classification of mental illnesses, as the drive for acceptance of sex-reassignment surgery advances.


Now, in other words, you understand that psychiatry up until the 70s, it tried, at least it tried, in some areas, to use empirical evidence and continuous studies on different categories of people to find out if there was such a thing as mental illness, and if there was all they could do is describe the signs and symptoms in order to give some kind of treatment. But in the 70s, the late 70s, the political agenda over-drove the empirical evidence and science.  And psychiatry failed to even pretend it was a science once it accepted political orders from above, as they changed a lot of stuff that used to be considered abnormal. ...which changed all of society. And this goes along too, with the Kinsey report and all the rest of it. I’ll put up again the woman who’s got so much documentation on it, it’s quite fantastic. I’ll put her links up again tonight to let you see the farce of the so-called… the big push of Kinsey, who fudged all his reports, again, and was funded by the Rockefeller foundation for doing it all. He even had paid people to have sex with children, babies… BABIES in his studies, and got away with it too. It changed all the court system. Back with more after this break.


Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America -


Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the big shakeup and new normals and so on and changes, by law, often using the guise of science, which itself is caving in under big lobby groups. So it’s no science at all obviously, if you just go for social acceptance in a particular science and disregard your own findings.  What kind of science is that? It’s nonsense. You’re right back at the Soviet era where they used psychiatry and so on to control the people. This is to do with transgendered persons, or the new normal it says.  So they’ve dropped ‘gender identity disorder’ from the DSM-5, the new psychiatrists’ Bible, that’s a political/social agenda now.


Whereas previously a man who “self-identified” as a woman (or vice versa) could have been classified as mentally ill, now the DSM-5 uses the term “gender dysphoria,” which means it is only a mental illness if you’re troubled by this self-identification. Elated activists in the “LGBT” community (A:  ...massively funded too…) had lobbied the APA for the change for years.


And this month in Massachusetts, students, parents and teachers are reacting with concern to a recent policy document from state Commissioner of Education Mitchell Chester stating that public schools should allow students to choose which bathrooms and locker rooms they use on the basis of their “gender self-identification,” not their anatomy.


The move follows on the heels of a federal judge’s order last September that Massachusetts provide a “sex change” operation to a male prison inmate.


The United Nations, too, weighed in on the issue recently, when a General Assembly anti-discrimination resolution included “gender identity” on the same level as race, creed, religion and sexual orientation.


But the Catholic Church continues to hold up a very different understanding of the permanence of an individual’s biological sexual identity.  (A:  But regardless of what the Catholics say, I mean, this was culturally the same in every country, non-Christians as well, for thousands of years, for I guess good reasons in a sense, because it can allow other things to happen, naturally, in a sequence.  Not just giving rights to a particular group but as I say, it’s used by the ones at the top who are using these rights for a different function altogether. Remember, the Frankfurt School said that the Western society was so disgusting to them altogether, because they came from a different culture, that they would destroy it, completely, right down to…  even necrophilia getting pushed out as entertainment wouldn’t be bad enough to destroy society, they’d go even further than that. Just putting it together for you, folks.)


This other article says…


Psychiatry 'Bible' DSM-5 Will Add PTSD (A: stress disorder…) for Preschoolers  (A:  ...right.) / KAREN KELLER / March 20, 2013


(A:  You understand, they said too, they’d REMAKE humanity, at the Frankfurt school. REMAKE humanity, grab them young. So here you are, folks. Everybody is fair game now. So children are going to get also diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder before they’re four or five.)


When the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-5, is published in May, a small section could alter the lives of millions of children.  (A:  Well, it’s to be the whole of the world actually.)


The manual, a reference bible for psychiatrists around the globe, will include pioneering guidelines to help doctors diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, in children under the age of 6, according to two psychiatrists who worked on the draft.


"When the DSM was written 20 years ago, it was mainly written about adults and field trials were all about adults," said Dr. Charles Zeanah Jr., vice chairman of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Tulane University. "The problem was there were children who were very severely traumatized but didn't meet criteria because they weren't included in the studies. Nobody knew what it looked like."  (A:  So they go looking for it, right. Well, the Frankfurt School gave them all this stuff, but they won’t mention that here.)


But new research details what PTSD looks like in young children and finds that treatment for these young sufferers can be effective, he said.  (A:  They want to drug everybody.)


The addition of a developmental subtype for any disorder is a first for the manual, which makes the expansion of the PTSD entry so exciting to researchers.  (A:  We’re all just little guinea pigs.)


"This is just what I hope will be the beginning of thinking of how different disorders manifest at different points in the life span," he said. (A:  ...and they go on and on and on about how wonderful this is and how they can diagnose you with anything at all.)


Small children develop PTSD at the same rate as adults -- one in four -- and the number of potential sufferers is vast, said Dr. Judith Cohen, a psychiatry professor at Drexel University's College of Medicine.


Consider sexual abuse cases alone: A quarter of all girls and a sixth of all boys have been sexually abused (A:  Again, no statistic...), and about a third of those are preschool-age, she said.  (A:  They always just pull these things out of the air, you know.)


"If we're talking about 25 percent [who] have PTSD, we're talking about a lot of children," (A:  ...a lot of money too, eh?) Cohen told


And yet because existing DSM criteria doesn't apply to young children, and because of society's tendency to idealize children as resilient, pre-schoolers aren't getting the diagnoses they desperately need, Zeanah said.  (A:  So, the children are crying out for drugging, you see. You understand? This is how everything is put across in propaganda. You are IN the Soviet, if you don’t get it, don’t know. You are REALLY into the new, updated, PERFECTED Soviet system.)


This article too, also is about PTSD, and again, the same thing, post-traumatic stress disorder for children. I’ve got quite a few articles; I’ll put them all up tonight.  


Psychiatry 'Bible' DSM-5 Will Add PTSD for Preschoolers - / March 20, 2013

Recent Updates to Proposed Revisions for DSM-5 -


Another one too, is...


Stop the Insanity - Statement of Concern about the Reliability, Validity, and Safety of DSM-5 -


So again, another thing you can put your name into, if you’re in the field at all, and try to get it stopped. Because it’s not science at all. This is a social agenda, for social engineering, a MASSIVE one.  They’ve been after this for about 80 years, at least, to get this power, over the whole of society. And this goes into the court system, it goes through government systems, it goes into the schooling system, the teaching, and literally, everybody, almost everybody’s going to get diagnosed now with one thing or another, and drugged from birth, and that’s the reengineering of all society that the Frankfurt school wanted all along. And by the way, they weren’t shy in telling you. They told you completely what they wanted. 


Also at the same time… It’s all happening at the same time because they went and passed it and pushed it through at the United Nations, and you know darn well all your countries have already signed this stuff; that’s how it works. All laws come from the United Nations, have for a long time. And the UN is a front set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, private foundation, private, not a public one, not democratic at all, neither is the United Nations, that sets up all the laws for all of you. You don’t vote any of them in. But it says…


Children's Rights Referendum: If you don't know, say no. / March 22, 2013


Because Ireland again is also fighting back on this. They were one of the last countries to get hammered with it. They’re fighting with it too because under the guise of Rights of the Child... See, the children are crying out for help, you understand. This is how it’s… You understand, this is the perfected Soviet. I’ve read so much on the Soviet system, this is what they used over there. And the same people, SAME people, folk, are running your countries now, with the same techniques. So in Ireland, once they put it through, the Rights of the Child, then comes the next amendment, and amendment, and amendment. They know, they’ve got them all lined up before they passed the first one.  Laws always get put on the books, and you all sit quietly and then you say, oh my God they’ve put in an amendment and they’ve changed everything. That’s how they do it, folks. So I’ll put this one up too tonight for those who are in Ireland and who want to sign their petition.


And another one too, as I say, in Britain, there’s about three or four petitions here. But I mean, this is the end of society as you know it, where you’ll have to literally train your children to watch what they say, or think, and all the rest of it, or else not only will they get diagnosed but they’ll go for the parents as well, I guarantee you, if they have any non-PC opinions on anything at all whatsoever.  And they’re constantly handing out all these surveys in school to children, what do your parents talk about? what do they think? on this topic and that topic? That’s how they’re getting it all. You are, if you don’t know it, in the new Soviet; you’ve been there for quite a long time.  And the Soviet is a cover for something else by the way. It’s up to you to find out.


And Canada too, has passed it into law, you can’t discriminate against them.  When they can define discrimination, again, into opinions and so on, you can’t say anything at all, what are you supposed to do? Just smile and say that’s wonderful?  …hmm? Is that okay? I mean, they haven’t told us what’s okay yet to answer in response if you’re asked any questions. That will come though. And the Canadian one, it says…


Canadian Parliament Passes Transgender Anti-Discrimination Law


Sponsored by New Democrat (A:  They’re far left, actually left of Marx.) Randall Garrison, the measure was approved by a vote of 149-137. It received support from key members of Canada’s Conservative Party, which has had a dicey record on rights for the country’s LGBT community. (A:  ...once again. Now who do you think funded and started up this LGBT community, folks?  It’s big, big bucks, you know; it’s not a little grass roots movement. They get external funding. They also get funding from the taxpayers, and big foundations. Remember too, I’ve told you about how you get funding as a nongovernmental organization.  It was set up by the United Nations for all the countries. And your tax money goes to groups who are for RADICAL CHANGE; that’s the only thing. You’ve got to prove that you’re for radical change, exactly what the Frankfurt School advocated, to destroy all existing normals, old normals, traditional normals had to be completely, utterly destroyed. Well, it’s happened. What’s next? What’s next on the list, eh? You better start thinking. If you want to think at all.)


“Today, New Democrats are proud to have contributed to ensuring equal protection under the law from discrimination and hatred (A:  ...hatred...) based on gender identity,” (A:  Now, you can’t even have disgust or dislike or whatever.) said Garrison on Wednesday. “Transgender and transsexual citizens are among the most marginalized and are too often victims of harassment and acts of violence.”  (A:  So, there you go. What’s next on the list? What’s next on the list?)


As I say, all the old normals are tossed out the window and every group has been encouraged to ask for rights, and demand rights, and getting paid to do so, to fund, you know, to push for them.


Australia police bust child sex abuse ring / 15 Mar 2013


Twenty-one people charged for using file-sharing network that contained images of children being exploited, police say.  (A:  Now, this is going to get worse and worse, because already… I’ve read the articles here where pedophiles now are asking for the same rights as all the other ones that have got rights in the last few years. After all, it’s their preference to go for children, right; that’s exactly the argument they’re using. I’ve said it before, once you knock down a pillar that holds up the ceiling, then the rest of them are all weakened and they start falling down one after another.  It’s easier to knock the rest of them down; it’s the first one that’s the hardest. You see.)


Police are sifting through thousands of images after executing search warrants on close to 40 premises [EPA].


Police have shut down one of the largest child sex exploitation rings seen in Australia that was dealing in "abhorrent and disgusting" images, officials have said.  (A:  Well eventually what’s going to be abhorrent and disgusting? I mean, that’s an opinion isn’t it? in this day and age, after the articles I’ve just been reading.)


Twenty-one people aged between 22 and 76 from around the country were arrested and charged, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) announced on Friday.


Police said they had also identified one child aged under 10 who was known to one of those charged and who appeared in some of the material.


"The material seized can only be described as abhorrent and personally disgusting," (A:  That’s their personal opinion, so I guess… they might get charged for that.) said Glen McEwen, cyber crime operations commander.


The operation began in January when a number of people were identified by the AFP using a file-sharing network that contained images of children of different ages being sexually abused.


Police are now sifting through thousands of images, with 26 hard drives found in one home alone, after executing search warrants on close to 40 premises during the week.


The network allowed those involved to access and download material from each other's computers.


"When you look at previous operations of similar activity, this is one of the largest," McEwen said.


One of those arrested was a woman, which police considered unusual for this type of crime, local media reported.


If convicted, the suspects could face up to 15 years in prison (A:  ...blah-blah-blah-blah-blah.) . . . 


"This operation shows that the internet is not anonymous (A:  Of course it’s not. They’ve known from the beginning what’s going on, and there’s never been anything getting by them, believe you me, and that’s why they promoted a lot of this stuff.) And if you are involved, or choose to groom children online, or be involved in the production, distribution or access of online child abuse, you will be pursued," he said.


And of course there’s another article too, that Facebook supposedly had a lot of stuff just come up the other day there too; it shocked a lot of people. And they’ve been known for years for doing this. But you often wonder, actually, if Facebook is putting the stuff up themselves, once in a while, because what do they say about publicity? Any publicity is good, folks. You think about it. Think about it, because they already have their censorship things, instant censorship things on Facebook. How did that get up there? Well, just a thought.


Fury as child abuse picture goes viral on Facebook with 16,000 'shares' and 4,000 'likes' - / Matt Blake / 22 March 2013


Also too, another topic that no one really cares about. It says…


Guantánamo hunger strike much bigger than reported,

rights group claims, 21 March 2013


(A:  It shows them all going on strike, a hunger strike and so on.)


A campaign group representing some of the inmates at Guantánamo Bay said on Thursday that a mass hunger strike currently taking place at the controversial prison camp is far larger than US military authorities have admitted.


On Wednesday, General John Kelly told a congressional committee that 24 Guantánamo prisoners were on "hunger strike light" and eating "a bit, but not a lot" as a way of protesting against allegations that the Qur'an had been mishandled by military staff, and also to highlight their continuing detention without trial.  (A:  Well, that’s going to be across the board everywhere, shortly, all that stuff, because they’ve passed all the laws so they can grab anybody within their own countries and do the same thing.)


And getting back to new normals and all the rest of it too, this is an interesting article actually. It’s a bit of a trivia thing as it comes out, but it’s also interesting why it’s in this book and what this book was put out for.


Hardcore Lesbian Porn Found In Children's Book, 'Otherworld', Published For Isle Of Man Charity / 19/03/2013


(A:  Well, I know some of these islands there, like the Jersey, and the Isle of Man, they’ve been up to a lot of strange stuff for years, as you well know.)


A children's book published to raise money for charity has been withdrawn from sale after 22 pages of hardcore lesbian porn were accidentally printed inside.  (A:  How do you accidentally print that inside? Has this been a special edition for certain members, I wonder?  Huh?  Think about it, folks.)


'Otherworld', by author Adrian Bailey, has sold 3,000 copies since its launch in 2011.


According to the BBC, Bailey was contacted in January 2012 by a woman who had come across the explicit text, extracts from two erotic stories.  lesbian porn kids book...  (A:  That’s how you groom children. You read them these kind of little sci-fi, or what you used to call fairy stories, and then they start grooming them. And then out comes the porn in amongst it. I mean, professional pedophiles know this stuff. But this stuff is printed in books. A limited edition, you might call it that, within a mass edition that didn’t have it in it? It’s a limited bunch; that’s going to be worth a lot of cash to the pedos.)


He received a "sincere" apology from the US printers but was powerless to know how many other copies of his book contained the illicit material.


Then last week another reader contacted him with the same problem prompting the publisher to recall the book.


Bailey said: "I just could not believe it. It was like the feeling you get when you're about to have a crash.


"I feel I can no longer stand by while more copies are potentially out there," reports the Telegraph.  (A:  So it makes you wonder what really… As I say, it’s like a limited edition within a mass edition isn’t it? It’s not an accident. How can you make that an accident, folks?)


Now, they’re banning, by the way, a lot of the big organizations that give you the other scientific data, and that use scientific data, again, all the studies that they will not print because big Pharma has more power than anybody else when it comes to the vaccine industry. They’re trying to force, in Australia for instance, organizations that tell you about the deaths and so on and reactions to vaccines, to use different terminology in their naming of them and so on, so as people won’t get confused. Well nobody gets confused, unless they want to be.  But here’s an article here... because this is a fact as well, the human papilloma virus, they’ve been pushing this big time, mainly on girls and so on, and there’s been deaths and so on. It’s now been confirmed about the deaths and the injuries, because they’re paying big court costs out and they’re admitting it. Back with more after this.


Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix and I was talking about the HPV vaccine, for instance, for one instance, that they’re admitting, quietly, by court cases and paying out to the injured or the parents of dead children and so on, after getting the HPV vaccine. But it says here…


HPV Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Confirmed /  March 20, 2013


Documents Obtained by Judicial Watch Reveal 200 Claims Filed with HHS for HPV Vaccine Injuries and Deaths, 49 Compensated.  (A:  And they’ve already compensated 49 people. They keep it quiet because they know there’s a lot more folk out there that have had the same kind of things happen.)


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has received documents from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealing that its National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has awarded $5,877,710 dollars to 49 victims in claims made against the highly controversial HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccines. To date 200 claims have been filed with VICP, with barely half adjudicated.


The documents came in response to a February 28, 2013, Judicial Watch lawsuit against HHS to force the department to comply with a November 1, 2012, Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:13-cv-00197)). (A:  So they’ve applied. The government didn’t want to give out the information but they had to because the request went in.) On March 12, 2013, The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of HHS, provided Judicial Watch with documents revealing the following information:


 •Only 49 of the 200 claims filed have been compensated for injury or death caused from the (HPV) vaccine.  Of the 49 compensated claims 47 were for injury caused from (HPV) vaccine the additional 2 claims were for death caused due to the vaccine.  (A:  ...that’s what they said in court. So for all those who think everything is wonderful they want to stick in you, you better think, folks. Because eventually you won’t get any data at all except their new PC data which is, everything is good for you, everything is good for you, or else. ...or they’re going to shut you down if you complain about it. ... or you’re mentally ill… mentally ill, again, and they can just give you forced medications, etc.)


And also, this article too, is about Mr. Biden.  See, the new kings of socialism, they’ve always been the same. The same in the Soviet Union, they lived like kings at the top in the Politburo. And by the way, it was intergenerational with the Politburo members, the same with the KGB. It still is, by the way. It’s the same families and their children that go into it over and over.


Joe Biden runs up bill of $585,000 for just ONE NIGHT in five-star Paris hotel (and taxpayers will pick up the tab) / Meghan Keneally / 22 March 2013


So, welcome to socialism, folks.  They really enjoy it at the top, and they’re doing awfully well about it.  Also an article too, is to do with... They’re telling us all the time and we acquiesce by our silence…


US plan calls for more scanning of private Web traffic, email / March 22, 2013


(A:  This is called repetition, for reinforcement, so as you get the point there’s no freedom, and you accept it.)


The U.S. government is expanding a cybersecurity program that scans Internet traffic headed into and out of defense contractors to include far more of the country's private, civilian-run infrastructure.  (A:  I’ll put that up too.)


And also, the United Nations, it says…


Nations urged to combine environmental and development goals / 21 March 2013 / John Vidal


(A:  Again, the planned society, the planned future, the planned world. An old idea, it’s all coming to fruition. Nothing is by chance. Nothing is happening by itself today, folks. Nothing, not one area of any agenda. It was written about a hundred years ago or more, some of them.)


'Humans are transforming the planet in ways that could undermine any development gains,' the paper warns.


Degradation of the natural world is undermining efforts to reduce poverty, warn scientists, who say the only chance of achieving global prosperity (A:  Well, they’re born liars, remember. You’re not going to get prosperity; these guys also are pushing for austerity.) is for all countries to combine poverty and environmental targets. 


So, they’ve got global warming, environmental targets and poverty all wrapped up together. So all laws, all bills, all future plans for government, right down to local, is to be combined totally as they bring you into their sustainable society/Agenda 21. And of course, who puts it through? Private institutions, again, folks, private institutions, from the foundations, the parallel government, and the United Nations that was set up by them.


This is the end of the night; it’s been a fast rush. From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 



Topics of show covered in following links:


Origin of Hate-Speech Laws

New Press Laws May End Blogging

The Systemic Crushing of Young Nonconformists and Anti-Authoritarians

Statement of Concern about Reliability, Validity and Safety of DSM-5

Petition against DSM-5 Launched

Psychiatry's New Normal---Drops Gender Identity Disorder in DSM-5

Dr. Judith Reisman---Truth on Porn, Kinsey Institute etc.

Dr. Judith Reisman Videos

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder----for Children---The Psychiatric Bible

& More on Article

& More on Above

Children's Rights Referendum Ireland

Canadian Parliament Passes Transgender Anti-Discrimination Law

Australia Busts Huge Child Sex Ring

More Child Porn on Facebook

Guantanamo Hunger Strike

Lesbian Porn in Children's Book "Otherworld"

HPV Vaccine Injuries Confirmed

Your Socialists Kings---Joe Biden runs up bill of $585,000 for just ONE NIGHT in five-star Paris hotel (and taxpayers will pick up the tab)

More Gov. Snooping on Individuals in US and Everywhere Else

PR Piece on Sustainable Development, Millennium Goals etc.