March 1, 2013 (#1280)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 1, 2013:
Terror and Horror of Sudden Slaughter:
Bombing "Just in Case",
Relations of the Dead Get in Your Face,
The Children Could Get Angry Too,
Maybe Grow Up and Come After You,
Prevention Cure for Inter-generational Strife,
Means Bomb Them Before They Grow up in Life
Rather than Wait to See if They Pick a Side,
Cull the Population (don't Call it "Genocide"),
Ancient Evil has Returned in All its Gory,
Justifying Actions with Each Deceitful Story,
Justifying Kills in Thousands or Fractions,
You Should Know Who're Evil by Their Actions"
© Alan Watt March 1, 2013
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 1, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on March 1, 2013. Sorry about the delay there but there’s complications at the other end there. What we do here on this program is to go through the big system and the history of it and where it’s taking us. It’s all very evident. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests. And you can buy the books and discs that I have at cuttingthroughthematrix.com to help you understand the system of conology. That’s what it’s called, conology, the art of ruling the world and vast amounts of people. So help yourself to that, all the free audios. As I say, I go through the history of the big foundations, that the big bankers got together, as far back as the 1700s in fact, and decided to form their own parallel government that eventually would rule the world, via money basically, and via also getting a hold of the reins of power, politics and so on. It’s all been accomplished. And here we are today, living through it, the last standardization of the few countries left, that don’t have central banks, private central banks, and who are not beholding to the World Bank. But once we bomb them into oblivion, then of course the first guys in are the IMF and the World Bank to give them the big dirty loan, with compound interest which you cannot ever, ever pay off; it’s just there forever. So, as I say, help yourself to that. Remember too, [Order and donation options listed above.]. And straight donations are really, really welcome.
Now, I’ve had trouble too, as you well know, with XplorNet many times in the past as they try to choke you off; generally to get the guy to come out from the repair shop and sell you a whole bunch of new stuff that you don’t really need, of course, after replacing stuff that generally is not defunct and costing you about a thousand bucks or whatever, then suddenly it starts working again after he makes a call to XplorNet. So they throttle it and I’ve got this throttling going on, so that’s why it’s been awfully slow on uploading and so on. Even today I can’t even pull down any pictures at all with the Java on whatsoever. All I can do is just get the print. And I’m paying a lot of money for this. But anyway, that’s what happens in this world when you’re not authorized to be out there. And every corporation today is just corrupt. They use blackmail, like we’ve got it, you need it, pay up or else. And as I’ve said before with XplorNet, definitely, it’s a definite choke that I’ve got on mine. Because I’m uploading less than I used to and yet they’re just giving me less and less time on it at all. So this is standard procedure and I won’t bitch about it much longer. But I’m looking at alternative ways to get a signal here, maybe a hub or something like that.
Now as we well know, that certain things in the world are taboo topics, but it depends who says it of course; then it’s not so taboo. But even if you say it, or read it in fact, it can still be taboo; it depends on the thought police that are running the world today. I was reading articles in Canada yesterday where we’ve got our own thought police here, and language police and everything else now, exactly what Orwell talked about. Remember too that Orwell’s character in 1984, Winston, says the right to freedom was the right to say 2 plus 2 equals 4. Where O’Brien, that was his master and tormentor, said no, it’s whatever we say it is. In other words, reality is whatever we say it is. If I put up four fingers and I say it’s five, you better say it’s five, and you better BELIEVE it, you see. That’s how mad indoctrination gets you to. It’s Pavlovian training through fear and so on. And freedom of speech cannot be infringed because if you do that you’ve got nothing left. You’re living under tyranny. And often you can actually tell who the tyrants are by the power that they wield over you. Quite simple.
There’s an article that came out today, it says…
Israeli Sniper Mor Ostrovski Posts Photo Of Palestinian Child In Crosshairs (Alan: ...of a rifle...) On Instagram (PHOTO)
huffingtonpost.com / Ryan Grenoble Posted: 02/18/2013
(A: He put the photo up apparently – I can’t see it because I can’t pull it down; it just stalls out on me. And it says it...)
...has drawn outrage and condemnation across the internet, leading to an official rebuke from Israel's military.
The image depicts a young boy sitting near a field, with his back towards the viewer. As the camera peers through what appears to be the scope of a sniper rifle, the boy's head sits centered in a set of crosshairs. (A: They won’t show you the ones where they actually fire them, but I mean, there have been ones out in the past it’s happened to, by the way. Anyway, it was reported in different papers...)
The Guardian reports that Ostrovski is a sniper in the Israeli army. Given the minarets and Arabic architecture in the background of the photo, the child is likely Palestinian. (A: ...who are slated for extinction, as we all know, after watching this since 1946 or so.)
The Israeli army has condemned the incident, saying it "doesn't accord with the IDF's spirits and values." (A: Well, there’s many other articles up there from the Israeli newspapers which would contradict that, believe you me. But I’ll put this up tonight anyway.)
It’s just one of the many things that you shake your heads at every day, all through your life actually, as you get this more commonly, more commonly and more commonly. It seems that some, some people in this world, of freedom and equality, are more important than others. Orwell said the same thing, in such utopias some are more equal than others, too. So that’s what you’ve got folks.
Now, this is an interesting little article. It says…
New York clinic seeks smallpox vaccine test subjects
vaccinenewsdaily.com / February 28, 2013 / Paul Tinder
(A: Now, these things go on all the time. They generally get people, and you’ll see it buried into the newspapers under want ads and so on, and it generally goes for the unemployed, who are really broke, dead broke, or it’s before their money kicks in, their insurance company kicks in and starts paying them some cash to tide themselves over. But these are the ones that they go for, all these. All kinds of injections, and it’s so ridiculous because you don’t know really, ever, what you’re getting. You just don’t know, no matter what they tell you. But anyway it says…)
New York clinic seeks smallpox vaccine test subjects
A facility in Irondequoit, New York, is one of 40 locations in the United States testing a vaccine against smallpox that was made available in Europe a few years ago.
The Irondequoit-based Rochester Clinical Research is one of 40 locations that will test a combined total of 4,000 people. RCR is enrolling 115 adults between the ages of 18 and 40 for the study who were never vaccinated against smallpox.... (A: ...and it goes on and on, and more and more about it. But they’re giving you, really, what is… It’s like a smallpox-like vaccine; it’s a synthetic type, but it’s live. That’s what they’re doing.)
And then this story came in too, [Alan chuckles.], right after it too. It was just coincidence, but here it comes out. It says…
San Diego Man Sexually Transmits Smallpox-Vaccine Virus
(A: ...because it’s from the vaccine; they can tell.)
A gay San Diego man came down with a smallpox-related virus after having sex with someone who received a vaccination for the once-epidemical illness.
The case, first reported in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Report, came to light last summer when a 24-year-old man with secondary vaccinia virus transmission (A: ...that’s from the vaccination.) came to the hospital complaining of a rash.
Medical Xpress reports:
The patient had lesions on his anus and lips, and developed fever, fatigue, and nausea.
The doctors diagnosed him with the vaccinia virus after realizing he had sex a week earlier with a man who received a smallpox vaccine, [but] who had not kept his vaccination site adequately covered. (A: [Alan laughing.] ...his vaccination site...adequately covered. Anyway...)
The infected man (A: I wonder where he got it, eh?) had also had sex with a third man two days before he sought treatment. The third man sought treatment a week later after developing lesions on his forearm, penis, and scrotum, and experiencing malaise, sore throat, and nasal congestion.
Smallpox was officially eradicated globally in 1980 (A: So they’re doing all these experiments for something that’s supposed to be gone. Why? Hmm?), but it’s believed the original carrier was given the smallpox vaccine as part of a Department of Defense program (A: So here, that ties in with the last one; they don’t mention the Department of Defense - it’s probably for that.) required for all military personnel after heightened concerns about bioterrorism.
The vaccina virus is similar to, but cannot actually cause smallpox. (A: Well, we’ll see.) , Those who have been inoculated can experience symptoms—including rash, fever, and aches—and be contagious. The virus doesn’t have to [be] sexually transmitted: It can spread by skin-to-skin contact or via infected clothing.
“The smallpox vaccine is a live-virus vaccine, and it’s not news that it can infect people, but it cannot convert to smallpox,” (A: I’d like to have that, with a battery of lawyers, in writing.) Dr. Marc Siegel, a professor of medicine at NYU, told Medical Xpress. “It’s a different virus; it’s a kissing cousin (A: Well it depends who you kiss, eh?) of smallpox. It can be transmitted if you are not careful.”
Both infected men have recovered fully and now have the bonus of being immune to smallpox. (A: So it gives you smallpox immunity, but it’s not a smallpox one, right, it’s a synthetic one. [Alan chuckles.])
So it’s really comical to watch what’s going on in the world. And also this article is from RT and it says…
Obama to threaten Iran with military strike in June,
(A: ...according to...) Israeli media reports
rt.com / February 27, 2013
According to a report on Israel’s Channel 10 News that has since been picked up by the Times of Israel, Pres. Obama will use an upcoming meeting overseas to discuss a military strike on Iran. Pres. Obama is scheduled to visit Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu next month, and during the get-together the two leaders will reportedly work out the details for a possible assault. (A: [Alan chuckles.]...between the two of them, right.)
And also too, in the aftermath of the old ex-Soviet system, which has been replaced by the new EU Soviet system, they have massive, massive poverty in some countries. And that’s why they’re flooding out… flooding, flooding out, under this great European Union. As I say, it’s a Soviet; that’s what it is. It’s dictatorial. It’s authoritarian. It’s not democratic at all. It says…
No wonder so many in Romania want a new life in Britain
thesun.co.uk / IAN GARLAND / 1st March 2013
(A: Well, the problem is, Britain is sinking with the weight of all of them flooding in, from all over the place, the whole world. But it says…)
MIGRATION experts predict tens of thousands of people will flood in from Romania to Britain each year - after EU restrictions are lifted on January 1 2014.
(A: It shows you these ghetto areas inside the country – I can’t see the pictures so I can only imagine. It says…) And these photos taken inside a ghetto that's home to hundreds of Gypsy and Roma people (A: ...the Gypsy people…) show why so many are so desperate for a new life in the UK. (A: But again, it just causes more problems in the countries that are already destitute and cutting back on their welfare, for the citizens in Britain, and their health care and everything else, because they’re paying for so, so much, which they shouldn’t be at all.)
Also, it says…
New and Horrific Trend of CIA Bombing Suspects
(A: This is the trend. If they might go and bomb you one day, why not just kill them now? If they MAY do one day. So it says they’re bombing suspects now…)
‘Just in Case’ They are Guilty
21stcenturywire.com / February 27, 2013 / Jason Liosatos
Back with more after this.
Hi folks. We’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the system and how they’re really… We’re seeing these articles, actually, in the papers, more and more about the drone strikes, etc. across the world. That’s getting you acclimatized to the fact that eventually they’ll be used internally for the same purposes, just to take out potential… possible… possible suspects, of anything at all, as they spread terrorism down into basic law. That’s where it’s supposed to go. We all know that. But that’s why they’re really letting all the public know what they’re up to in other countries right now. You get used to it. You accept it, you adapt. Then when it happens in your own country it’s, oh well I guess it had to happen. You’re pre-programmed for it too. So I’ll put this one up as well.
And this one too, it’s quite interesting, because I never watch the Oscars; it’s just too much flamboyant nonsense for me. This is written in the Jewish Journal and it says…
Oscar’s big Jewish joke
jewishjournal.com / February 25, 2013 / Danielle Berrin
(A: And the writer, Danielle Berrin, goes through how they have all these inside jokes, that the general public are oblivious of too, to do with Jewishness basically in Hollywood. And it says...)
But for some in the Jewish establishment (A: ...if you say anything), this is akin to a crime. Talk of Jewish power is asur, forbidden. If it exists, it should be secret. Therefore the historic and enduring Jewish presence in Hollywood is publicly regarded as “myth,” a “falsity,” a “stereotype,” and should not be construed as fact. It is dangerous -- much too dangerous – even to joke about.
Take for example, this year’s big Jewish Oscar joke which came courtesy of host Seth MacFarlane. It was delivered by the actor Mark Wahlberg and his snuggly-looking, smut-talking sidekick stuffed-bear. . .
Anyway, she goes on about it too, about how they give out these jokes, commonly, at the thing, about their in-house jokes. But she said basically, at the end, after all the different people attacked them, the authorized attackers that they have in that community, and she says that some of us don’t need to be looked after, we’re quite comfortable being what we are, she says. And it makes sense too, because even other people censoring even the people they’re supposedly protecting, they’re censoring them from having a joke too, and it’s just gone too far. Again, a lot of people too, are really comfortable in their own skin these days; they feel quite safe and all the rest of it. So I’ll put this up tonight and you can read through it. And you can see who actually condemned the jokes and it’s getting just out of hand, all this, you know, all this thought police and so on.
And also, an article too, from a guy who also writes for the LA Times, and who tells you who runs Hollywood; he’s not ashamed of it he says. It says...
How Jewish is Hollywood?
latimes.com / Joel Stein / December 19, 2008
A poll finds more Americans disagree with the statement that 'Jews control Hollywood.' But here's one Jew who doesn't.
(A: And he, Joel Stein, goes right through it. He actually calls Americans pretty stupid, that they don’t know who runs it; he actually says that. Actually, this is his words…)
Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood. (A: And that was from 2008; I’ll put that up tonight too.)
But it really is thought police and all this nonsense. It’s getting beyond a joke, it’s way beyond any kind of joke. Even this article too, it just came in today...
US big guns row over Honduran ‘hate’ pope candidate
thejc.com / Ray Filar / February 22, 2013
(A: And again, that’s from the Jewish Chronicle and it says...)
Harvard academic Alan Dershowitz has hit out at the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). . . (A: So you’ve got two groups that are the thought police and the speech police today, fighting with each other, because one of them says that this candidate for Papacy is okay and the other one says no. It’s not Christians arguing over this; it’s funny, it’s another group altogether isn’t it?)
In a letter published in the Miami Herald, Mr Dershowitz accused Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez Maradiaga of Honduras of propagating conspiracy theories about Jews, describing him as an “unrepentant sinner” who has compared the “Jewish-controlled media” to Hitler for its persecution of the church.
He said the cardinal, a possible replacement for Pope Benedict XVI, blamed the Jews for “the scandal surrounding the sexual misconduct of priests toward young parishioners.”
Mr Dershowitz added: “He has argued that the Jews got even with the Catholic Church for its anti-Israel positions by arranging for the media — which they, of course, control (A: ...this is Dershowitz here…) — to give disproportionate attention to the Vatican sex scandal.”
But National Director of the ADL Abraham Foxman defended the cardinal. “As far as we are concerned, the issue is closed,” he said.
“He has never said anything of the same sort in the past 10 years. He is involved in a Catholic Jewish dialogue group in Latin America and has never repeated any such views.” (A: So everyone has to get vetted today for anything, it seems, by, I don’t know if it’s self-appointed people or what, you know. But it’s getting silly. It’s just crazy and silly.)
Lloyds of London… This is the age of plunder. You understand, the big boys know what they plan, the next big crash that they plan. Because they plan it well in advance. And they never lose, because again we always bail them out. And it has the added benefit of not letting a good crisis go to waste. They get us to bail them out, and it gets us further in the hole, in debt, we go down and we’re right into austerity, as we’re supposed to go. That’s the whole plan. And it says here…
Lloyds shares sale (A: They’re selling off shares.) moving closer
money.uk.msn.com / 3 Mar 2013 / By pa.press.net
The sale of taxpayer-owned shares in Lloyds Banking Group looked to be a step closer despite the lender's £6.8 billion PPI mis-selling scandal sending it to another big loss. (A: So they’re selling off even supposedly shares owned by the taxpayers, who doesn’t even know that they’ve got them. Because in our name our government puts these things in there, you see, and says, oh that’s the taxpayers’.)
The sale of taxpayer-owned shares in Lloyds Banking Group looked to be a step closer. . .
Lloyds said it remained in the red with £570 million of losses in 2012 after taking more mammoth mis-selling provisions. (A: So they made a lot of mistakes. But I’m sure we’ll bail them out too, mind you, as they sell off the public shares in it, [Alan chuckles.], the taxpayers’ shares. Back after these messages.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re talking about this matrix we live in. It really is quite comical at times too, and it’s very tragic at other ones as well, as insanity rules, authorized insanity in fact, with a lot of power in authorized insanity. We’re getting trained, of course, to be in a post commercialized, post consumer society where we’re simply going to be slaves. It’s a new feudal system, according to Carroll Quigley who was the historian for the Council on Foreign Relations organization. It really is a feudal system. They want to bring you down to utter poverty and then, literally, everyone will get stamped for their function and their standing, and necessity as well, for the community, or the world community or whatever community they’re talking about. So I’ll put up an article tonight about Agenda 21, which is all part of it too. And it shows you how far ahead – it was in 1992 that they had the first Rio summit by Mr.... Strong, Maurice Strong; I always forget his name, because I know he’s related to other families too and I get them all confused. Anyway, he was the guy who was put forward to pitch the idea, to a bunch of people who already knew it was going to get pitched because they were all part of it. These meetings are just where they go and get your officials to sign things from your countries, and they draft it up maybe a year, two years in advance. The guys who go back and forth as bureaucrats, to get all the agreements made before the big meeting, are called Sherpas, for those who don’t know. Anyway it says…
Agenda 21 Is Being Rammed Down The Throats Of Local Communities All Over America
theeconomiccollapseblog.com / By Michael / December 23rd, 2012
(A: And it tells you, again, it started with Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.)
... Since then, it has been adopted by more than 200 counties and it has been modified and updated at other UN environmental summits. (A: We don’t vote for any of this stuff. We’re run by private organizations.) The philosophy behind Agenda 21 is that our environmental problems are the number one problem that we are facing, and that those problems are being caused by human activity. (A: ...and too many folk as well.) Therefore, according to Agenda 21 human activity needs to be tightly monitored, regulated and controlled for the greater good. (A: In other words, they need a big culling, is what they mean, and forced sterilization; that’s another part of it too.) Individual liberties and freedoms must be sacrificed for the good of the planet. If you are thinking that this sounds like it is exactly the opposite of what our founding fathers intended when they established this nation, you would be on the right track. Those that promote the philosophy underlying Agenda 21 believe that human activity must be "managed" (A: ...by world managers, you see; I’ve mentioned world managers many times.) and that letting people make their own decisions is "destructive" and "dangerous". Sadly, the principles behind Agenda 21 are being rammed down the throats of local communities all over America (A: ...and Canada and elsewhere…), and most of the people living in those communities don't even realize it.
So how is this being done? Well, after Agenda 21 was adopted, an international organization known as the "International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives" (ICLEI) (A: ...a private organization, again, funded by foundations.) was established to help implement the goals of Agenda 21 in local communities. One thing that they learned very quickly was that the "Agenda 21" label was a red flag for a lot of people. It tended to create quite a bit of opposition on the local level. (A: They also call it Millennium Goals and so on, like that; there’s different names for it. On their website, I read from it, at the United Nations actually, and they told them to keep changing the names for it because the public were catching on... on the UN’s website.)
As they try to implement their goals, they very rarely use the term "Agenda 21" anymore. Instead, they use much more harmless sounding labels such as "smart growth", "comprehensive land use planning" and especially "sustainable development".
So just because something does not carry the Agenda 21 label does not mean that it is not promoting the goals of Agenda 21. (A: So, as I say, it’s happening across the whole world, and I’ll put this article up tonight. And there’s more to the article than I read.)
And also this one here, it says…
European Commission (A: Again, this really unelected bunch of commissioners, or commissars, the new Soviet Union Empire based in Brussels that runs all of Europe...) Announces “Full Engagement” (A: ... FULL ENGAGEMENT…) In Agenda 21
Jurriaan Maessen / ExplosiveReports.Com / March 1, 2013
On February 27, the European Commission published a document announcing it will take on itself the “lead role” in global environmental governance through “a unified policy framework”- in effect aligning itself with Agenda 21.
In the 30-page document titled (A: ...A Descent Life for All—actually I should say “Descent” and reword it. They say “Decent”...) A Decent Life For All (A: But it’s really a descent, or a descending life for all, isn’t it? And the link is here too; I’ll put that up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.) The EC says it aspires to a “leading role” in an “overarching framework” towards global governance. (A: That’s what I’m talking about, you have global managers and they call it global governance.) The commiszars profess to care about worldwide poverty, environmental degradation and other no-brainers, carefully handpicked by an elite-class prepared to use any and every pretext behind which power is being centralized at the international level at the expense of sovereignty at the national one. (A: Remember too, it’s staffed at the top with neo-Marxists and neo-Trotskyists – they call themselves now, after Lenin gave Marxism a bad name, or at least Stalin did. They changed their name to being Trotskyists; it sounds better, even though he was a mass slaughterer as well. Remember, that was the whole thing in communism too, centralizing all power in all nations, and then into blocs of nations, like the European Union – that’s why I say it’s the new Soviet – and eventually the world.)
“The world has undergone enormous change over recent years”, the document reads, “including major shifts in the global economic and political balance, increased global trade, climate change (A: They always put climate change in here.) and depletion of natural resources, technological change, economic and financial crises, increased consumption and price volatility of food and energy consumption, population changes and migration, violence and armed conflict and natural and man-made disasters, and increased inequalities.”
Quite some parade of calamities the EU is willing to tackle. A lead role is what they work towards, the authors state- and the EC Commiszars are perfectly willing to “debate” their plans with the European (only in name) parliament. (A: And it’s true, it’s only in name that it’s called European.) A few exceptions aside, this parliament consists of nodding, dozing- sometimes outright sleeping individuals who are there to approve the commission’s proposals and send their lunch-bills to the European taxpayer: (A: And they do that without qualm. And they do nod off, if you ever see them. They’re always nodding off there, or watching porn on their Internet. No kidding. There are so many things, comical things that they’ve caught them doing.)
“The EU needs to engage fully in the forthcoming international processes with coherent and coordinated inputs at the UN and in other relevant fora. In this respect, the adoption of this Communication should be followed by a debate with Council and Parliament during the spring of 2013 for the development of a common EU approach for the next stages of the ongoing processes (…)”
As the documents lists these stages, we immediately recognize the “overarching framework” as a merging of regional blocks (such as the EU) with the United Nations and Agenda 21. The Commission:
- ensure a comprehensive follow up to Rio+20 and guide the EU position at the UN Open Working Group (OWG) on SDGs, which will report regularly to the UNGA; (A: You need a whole dictionary for all these organizations that belong to the United Nations.)
- contribute to the preparation of the UN General Assembly Special Event on the MDGs in autumn 2013, including the report of the Secretary-General and the UN High Level Panel on post-2015, as well as the first meeting of the HLPF. The EU should support moving towards a post-2015 overarching framework. Discussion on the basis of the orientations set out above should make it possible for the EU to come to a common position on how the SDGs and the MDG review processes should best be converged and integrated into a single process to better deliver such a comprehensive framework.”
“Converge”, “integrate”, “a single, overarching process”. Words by cautious tyrants. All noses are now pointed in the same direction: towards the realization of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, including Agenda 21.
“To be achievable, the overarching framework should be accompanied by an effort to ensure that all resources are mobilised (A: ...all resources, folks; that’s YOU too, and your water and your food and everything…) and harnessed effectively, alongside a commitment by all countries to pursue a comprehensive approach to these resources and coherent and appropriate policies.”
To name just a few of these goals:
- climate and energy package and low carbon roadmap for 2050 (A: That’s high taxation, personally, for emitting carbon dioxide and so on.)
- 2030 climate and energy policy (A: That’s one of the goals.)
- energy efficiency directive
- ongoing legislative proposals on emissions from cars and vans (A: They want you off the road.), as well as fluorinated GHG reduction
In my October 10 2012 article (A: This author says; he put down...) EU-Funded Group Outlines Draconian Population Control Scenarios For The Next Forty Years, I covered a document from 2010, funded by the European Union and the World Wildlife Fund, titled Scenarios towards a One Planet Economy in Europe, in which several scenarios or “paths” are outlined towards a “one planet economy”. The “policy settings” mentioned within the document that are neatly in line with the endgame as formulated in Agenda 21, namely to redistribute wealth globally (A: ...that’s from you, higher taxations – you do it already; the Marxian concept of redistribution of wealth...), “greening” the global economy and to stabilize (read: reduce) the global population. In addition, the authors of this document sketch out a scenario in which the EU will control education and media: (A: You have to be totally indoctrinated into political correctness, of all kinds.)
“In 2050”, the document reads, “Europeans are forced to adopt green lifestyle habits– for example, via bans on non-essential individual long distance travel. (A: That’s part of Agenda 21, folks. They said there would be no private vehicles, if you read the whole Agenda 21. There would be no private vehicles; only essential vehicles would be allowed on the roads.) By this stage, air travel has long been too expensive for the majority of people. The state controls or heavily influences all available channels of education, media and marketing to spread this message to continually reinforce its adoption and mould perceptions of sustainability.” (A: In other words, total brainwashing.)
This reflects the proposal I covered recently issued by a plethora of prominent scientists to establish an Agenda 21-style scientific dictatorship in the United States. The document by the EU-funded group states:
“By 2020, most media outlets were tightly controlled by the government and used to try to manage behaviour change (A: That’s their job, creating behavioral change…), selling the “cool to play within the limits” (A: So it’s “cool to play within the limits.” So you’re good if you do that.) and “green means growth” messages.”
In the 2010 document, the authors also envision a future EU where “voluntary and assisted suicide became legal in all EU countries.” (A: Because they want to kill off folk who are beyond working age; they don’t want them to retire and have a pension. They want to take your pension from you. It’s already happening; I’ve read the articles, even yesterday concerning the US.)
European Commissioner for the Environment Potočnik recently stated that he “attaches more importance to behaviour-changing policies such as green taxes rather than ‘reactive’ policies that punish polluters”. Quoting his “good friend” Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme, as saying that the idea of governing markets was agreed upon when Agenda 21 was formally created in 1992 at the original Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro....
So, you’re going into a completely Orwellian time, folks, and at the end of it they hope to have the Brave New World scenario, after we go through the Orwellian part of the big boot and the black-clad guys. After that we’ll just behave ourselves because we’ll be totally indoctrinated.
And this one too is to do with… Oh yeah, the bombing suspects, just in case they’re guilty. I touched on that one but I didn’t go through much of it there. It says…
There is a new trend in the ‘war on terror’ by the real world terror of the US, Israeli and Western governments, and it is called ‘bomb them just in case’.
With the looming threat of an attack on ‘innocent’ Iran, it is the same premise of ‘bomb them just in case’. This tactic is no different than shooting someone ‘just in case’ they get a gun and kill you, even though they have never exhibited any aggression or threat of aggression towards you, or indeed never possessed a gun in the past.
A similar analogy is that of a bully in a school yard, terrorizing and beating up the younger kids ‘just in case’ they grow bigger and tougher and ‘just might’ become a threat to you later on, so get them anyway ‘just in case’. It is the same as the horrific, unprovoked murders taking place in Pakistan by the Drone strikes, which is murder without a trial for the victims or the perpetrators. Again we see the same pattern of ‘kill them just in case’ they might be guilty, with no evidence, no proof, and no trial. (A: Actually, it's part of standard warfare taught now, even in Sandhurst, is to kill off the children as well because they may grow up to be terrorists, because they’ll be so angry at what’s been done to their countries. And that came from Israel too, the same with the first-strike policy: They’re not hitting us, they aren’t even threatening us, but one day they will so let’s hit them first. And that’s been adopted by the US completely. Quite the world eh?)
We’re living, really, in an incredible changing world… incredible, incredible changing world… so fast that most folk can’t even keep up with it. Now, they do recruit psychopathic people at the top, who will sell their countries down the drain, like Tony Blair, a definite psychopath. He’s got all the qualities of the psychopath, absolutely; no repentance. Even in the interviews he’s given to do with his, basically, sole push for war on Iraq and bringing the British government into it, he said that he still wouldn’t go back and change his mind; he didn’t think he did anything wrong. See, a psychopath will never say they’re wrong, never, ever say they’re wrong, ever, ever, ever. That’s the way it is. And they have no remorse, you see. They don’t have sleepless nights worrying about things. It’s not in the makeup of a psychopath. Anyway…
Tony Blair admits people are still 'very abusive' (A: ...to him... right?)
10 years after he ordered Iraq invasion
dailymail.co.uk / Matt Chorley, Mailonline / 26 February 2013
Ex-PM says he has given up trying to persuade critics that the 2003 conflict was the right decision. (A: Well, it was for the ones who planned it all. And we do know that Kissinger said that, and Brzezinski too, that a long-term strategy of getting internal conflict going between the different factions, having them fight forever, would make them totally useless and no threat to anybody. Which they’ve proven that’s the case. The US and other countries, and Britain too, now are funding all sides, all the different types of Muslim groups and so on, so they all kill each other. Exactly as they planned. The big boys do tell you what they’re going to do, you know. Anyway it says…)
Tony Blair last night admitted the Iraq War had made him a hate figure in Britain – and acknowledged it had failed to make the world a safer place. (A: So he admits that part, it hasn’t made us any safer. Actually, it’s worse now because if your country got bombed you might grow up being awfully angry about it, for instance.)
In a frank interview to mark the tenth anniversary of the conflict, the former [British] prime minister said members of the public were still ‘very abusive’ towards him over his decision to take Britain to war alongside George W. Bush. (A: ...who worked for a foreign power at the time, by the way.)
Mr Blair acknowledged that the situation in Iraq was still ‘not nearly what it should be’, with the country suffering almost daily terrorist attacks.
But he said he had ‘given up’ trying to persuade people he had made the right decision. And he insisted the situation would have been even worse if Saddam Hussein had been left in power. (A: Well why? Worse than what? It’s in the Stone Age now, folks. Look at the money it’s cost too, and look at the lives that have been lost. Over what? Who benefited? Well we know, don’t we? Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about an article about Tony Blair, the great psychopath who got his pockets filled by the big boys once he left office; I mean, that’s when they get their big payoffs, you know. He was in with the big bankers after that too, and doing different things across the Middle East for getting the oil into the oil companies’ coffers and so on, as they plundered the countries. Awfully, handsomely rewarded for it too. But it says here…
He made no apology for the conflict, which cost 179 British lives (A: ...which is nothing compared to the Iraqis.) and led to the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqis. (A: Well, in the starvation embargo they had on with Madeline Albright, before it happened, she was asked about 500,000 dying – it was about half a million at that time. It was about a million by the time they finished starving them to death, women, children and all the rest of it; they wouldn’t even let medical aid in or antibiotics in. So it’s vastly over 100,000 Iraqis altogether...) And he suggested the West was in the middle of a ‘generational’ conflict which may also require military intervention in Syria and Iran. (A: Well, he’s completely PC, this guy; he knows who lines his pockets.)
His comments sparked anger among opponents of the war. (A: ...especially ones who have had guys killed in the military over there. And they’re very angry and one of them said…)
‘As far as I’m concerned he should be dragged in shackles to the International Criminal Court for war crimes,’ he said. ‘We invaded a sovereign country (A: ...and it was sovereign, remember…) and went against the United Nations. (A: Well, the United Nations is part of the problem, folks, as we well know. And of course, they also want the ICC, the International Criminal Court for a different purpose, not for what you think it is. Nothing is for what you think it’s for.)
‘When I look at my son’s grave I think, what did he die for? It is a total waste. Blair shouldn’t be surprised that people shout at him in the street – this will follow him to the end of his days. (A: It won’t bother Blair at all because as I say, he’s really a real out-and-out psychopath and they have no conscience; big smiling face, he would con anybody. Oh, he’s a nice fella… that’s what you think of psychopaths, they’re all nice fellas, you know. That’s how they are.)
Also tonight too, I’ll put up a link to… Most folk forget that the big boys, like who came up with the idea at the Club of Rome for global warming, to change all our lives and get us to act like obedient little servants in austerity... Before that they tried the other tactic, hoping there was going to be an ice age. They were putting out all the articles back in the 70s of the Coming Ice Age. All the same guys who are involved in the global warming were in on it, writing books and everything, the same guys, for the United Nations and all the big ones who own the United Nations.
1970s Global Cooling Alarmism - populartechnology.net / February 28, 2013
It’s got all the articles and links here. You can really go through all the articles, the big ones that came out from the 70s onwards about all the excuses they were using then. They were saying that pollution then was causing the ICE AGE. We were causing it; it was a man-made global ICE AGE. No kidding you. Now it’s man-made global warming. It doesn’t matter what they call it, you see, they’ll get it through regardless. Because it’s to tax you into the earth and make sure you’re trained into being a good obedient slave, to save us all you understand. This is a long article, all the links are in it; they’ve done their homework. There’s probably well over a hundred articles on here to do with what they were churning out and terrifying the public with, or trying to terrify the public with, back in the 1970s. And then it didn’t quite turn out that way so they, overnight, switched to, oh, global warming, global warming will fry the planet, too many people, there’s too many people having it too good... can’t have that.
So you understand, the media’s all part of it of course, always is. And we’re already in the age of world management. What we get fed at the bottom is mainly propaganda, mainly propaganda, sometimes outright propaganda, other times half a story is missing; the other half of a story is missing to bring you to the correct conclusion that your Masters want you to come to. But it goes on and on doesn’t it? Because they want a world management system, none of this democracy stuff.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Israeli Sniper Posts Photo of Palestinian Child in
Smallpox Clinic Seeks Test Subjects for Vaccine
Man Sexually Transmits Smallpox Vaccine Virus
Israel Reports Obama to Threaten Iran with Military Strike in June
Life Inside Romanian Ghettos
CIA Bombing Suspects "Just in Case"
Oscar's Big Jewish Joke
& More on Above
Hate Authorities in Row over Selection of Next Pope
Lloyds of London Selling Off Taxpayer Owned Shares
Agenda 21 Rammed down Throats of Local American Communities
Von Rompuy Threatens Britain Would Pay a High Price if it Left the EU Soviet Parliament
EU Commission Announces Full Engagement in Agenda 21
& PDF on Above
Psychopath Tony Blair says People Still Abusive over his Order to Invade Iraq
When Our Masters Backed Global Cooling in the 1970s