January 22, 2013 (#1254)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 22, 2013:

Paying the Piper who is Anti-Lifer:

"Tired of the System, Wishing for Another?
Forget It, We've been Conquered by Big Brother,
Multitudes of Changes, All Incremental,
Created a New System, Not Coincidental,
Introduced Stealthily, Inter-Generational,
Pushing the Envelope, Media Conversational,
And Everyone Adapted, New Attitudes, Behaviour,
Promiscuity, Free-Love, Abortion-Clinic-Saviour,
As Life Became Cheaper, Masters Grew Bolder,
Introducing Euthanasia for Those who're Older,
Now Those Getting On in Years Ask What to Do,
Terminator asks "What's so Special About You?"
During the Changes Media Played "Just Have Fun",
Very Few Matured as it All was Being Done"
© Alan Watt Jan. 22, 2013

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Jan. 22, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers’ Comments)

 

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on January the 22nd, 2013.

I always remind newcomers to the program to look into the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You’ll find lots of audios for free download, where I go through the histories of the system you’re born into and how it’s a very old, old system; an old, old plan, of course. But it really came to fruition in the early 20th century (openly, that is), under the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which decided to take over the world, use the British Empire as the embryonic system, which the US would take over after them, and they’d share it together, I’m talking about the banking fraternities, of course. And they’d also own all of the resources, including your water and food and everything; not just the precious gold and diamonds, which they went after right away, but everything you need to live on, basically, they would own. So, help yourself to the histories and the people behind it, because they still run it today. The whole world government idea is their idea; the unified Europe is their idea. And the unified Americas, that’s still coming in, it’s still getting pushed, is their idea too. Same with the APEC countries in the Far East. So, it’s all a big program. You’re living through a script, including the wars that have to happen to take down countries that they say won’t fit in, the way they are at the moment. So, they’re all being standardized into the same system one way or the other.

And, remember too, you can get transcripts in English, of the talks I’ve given, on all the sites listed at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, for print up. And you can also go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts in other languages. And remember too, you bring me to you. You are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring advertisers on as guests. And I depend on you the listeners to support me. So, you can do so by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com or donating. And from the US to Canada, remember, you can still use personal checks or international postal money orders, from the post office. And you can also send cash or use PayPal. Across the world: Western Union, MoneyGram and PayPal.

But we truly are going into this world society, planned, as I say, an awful long time ago. And this institution that was given a royal charter to exist, puts people into government. In fact, they even claim, from their own personal historian, from their American branch (Council on Foreign Relations), that they’ve run the country for a hundred years, putting in presidents in the US and across the world too, where they have their bases. They have them across the whole world now, in every country. They even have the European Council on Foreign Relations and George Soros was appointed as head of that one. So, they run the world and their whole idea was to bring in this global system and eventually get their private central banking systems all over the world, borrowing from the World Bank. And the IMF is the heavy guy who comes in to collect and tell governments what to do. And also, they all come under the auspices, ultimately, of the Bank for International Settlements. Their own personal historian was Professor Carroll Quigley. He documented that in his own book, The Anglo-American Establishment (worth getting a hold of). So, you’re living through a script and everything that happens on a big scale, like the wars that are going on, were planned by this group. Before they became the Royal Institute of International Affairs, they were called the Milner Group... Alfred Milner... Lord Alfred Milner (top banker in London with a bunch of his cronies there). And he actually came from Germany to run the system in Britain. And also, the offspring of the families (there are Curtis and a whole bunch of them) all worked towards bringing in this world government. They wanted wars with Germany, to knock them out of the game. They funded and helped promote the Soviet system to come into existence. They funded Germany, as well, to come into existence in the Nazi era and they had the wars going. They said that world wars would be inevitable in order to get this world to its knees to go under a global form of government and an economic master. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. Remember, the elite themselves are really worried, because they are always projecting into the future; they’re desperate to always know their own particular future and make sure that they run it, or their offspring run it, because they claim that the rest of the public are using up all the natural resources, so there’s a massive outcry for depopulation, of course. And when I was small in Britain, it wasn’t overpopulated then and they had work because they hadn’t been sold out to the EU and they hadn’t been sold out to shipping all their factories off to China, through negotiations and treaties from the top. This is a world agenda, remember, for every country. And so they used to have... I think it was Margaret Thatcher who came and she said, we’ll have to open the floodgates to immigration, she said, because people aren’t having enough children to pay off the national debt. That was the con that she used there. But the fact was too, that the British people had been awfully good, in other words, they obeyed their masters and had their one-point-whatever children per family, child per family, and they’d done what they were told. So it was not good enough. You can’t win, you understand, because there’s a bigger agenda at work. And, at that time, they used to show always, overpopulated places in Bangladesh or in India; they’d always show you the same place in Calcutta, with masses of teeming people. And everyone thought, well thank God it’s not like that here. But, the thing is too, to get everyone involved into believing all this, they must bring in mass immigration, to make it like that – to make it appear like that, you see, into countries that truly weren’t meant to house them. So, massive things are happening, of course. And now, the average person in Britain probably thinks it’s overcrowded and it’s all our fault.  Well, it’s not our fault; you’re doing what you want and if you are decreasing your native population why should you be put under by hoards coming in, that are told to come in, by their governments, partly to destroy what’s left of the culture, too, because that was part of the agenda of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (destroying all the cultures). And then there would be world peace when the one group would rule over the rest, you see. One group would rule over the rest. And that’s pretty-well happened.

Anyway, every so often they come out with their favorite front men, who are always on television. And every country has their favorite person who is given the job (it’s Suzuki in Canada and it’s Attenborough in Britain) to hype on about global warming, overpopulation, all that kind of stuff, all the PC stuff. But Sir David Attenborough has been going for years. He started off, again, with nature and animals. You always love people who like animals, you see. And children get raised up with them and then they turn into greenies, you see; that’s the whole idea of it. But they have a different agenda. It says,

“Sir David Attenborough has described mankind as a ‘plague on the Earth’ and issued a stark warning that the world must limit population growth. This is to herald his new series on television on the Eden Channel.”

 

Alan: I guess there’s not many people in Eden. Anyway, it says,

“The 86-year-old presenter bleakly predicted that if humans do not curb burgeoning populations...”

 

Alan: Well, who are the humans that are causing... who have got burgeoning populations?  Because it’s not the people of – I’ve read the articles here from the United Nations, themselves, on Britain, Canada, the States and elsewhere, where the native populations have been plummeting for years. It’s the mass immigration that’s causing it and that’s welcomed in by the governments. Anyway,

“Sir David, who is a patron of the Population Matters organisation which calls for smaller family sizes...”

 

Alan: He’s also a member of the “Optimum Population Club.”

“...made his comments while speaking to the Radio Times about his latest series for the Eden channel.”

 

Alan: And it says here that,

“The face and voice of natural history programmes, his career has spanned 60 years, but David Attenborough said in a Radio Times interview he would not be replaced as a BBC nature frontman.”

 

Alan: Remember the BBC – and I’ll put that article up again tonight, on the BBC – all the money they spent getting the BBC on board with the whole greening/depopulation agenda (too many people). They spent a lot of cash on that. That’s why those who disagreed with the BBC, who worked in the BBC, on the global warming/climate change, were all kicked out, like Bellamy, for instance. But it says,

“‘The more you go on, the less you need people standing between the animal and camera waving their arms about,’ he said. ‘It’s cheaper to get someone in front of a camera describing animal behaviour than actually showing you it.’”

 

Alan: He says. So, anyway, he says,

“‘Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now.’”

 

Alan: I wonder on whose behalf, though, because obviously there’s people killing folk off, etc. So, there’s two articles on him; I’ll put them up tonight. And going back, remember too, this is the plague stuff and Prince Philip in 1984, said this: humanity is reaching plague proportions, he says. Now, he’s a real expert, Prince Philip, you know. He’s been involved in so much work all his life and studying and so on, down in the wine cellar, you know, of Buckingham Palace. But it says,

“Conservationist (and infamous patron of the Optimum Population Trust) David Attenborough recently said that humans, as a species, are a “plague” on the environment. He therefore proposed limits to human populations...’ ”

 

Alan: He says,

“‘We are a plague on the Earth,’ ...”

 

Alan: And he says,

“‘It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now.’ The ‘plague’ comments by the famous BBC presenter literally echo statements made by His Royal Highness Prince Philip who in 1984 bluntly pointed out that humanity is ‘reaching plague proportions.’ By stating humans are a plague, these environmentalists are saying that humanity equals a disease.”

 

Alan: It’s very much like The Matrix movie, where the agent, who is actually a computer program, talks to Morpheus and says, you’re a disease, you’re a virus; that’s what he calls them (humanity).

“A disease that may be cured by, as Attenborough proposes, limiting population growth. If not, ‘nature will do it for us.’  This belief is deeply embedded in a large part of the environmentalist- and scientific- community. Philip’s son, the prince of Wales, recently endorsed a report on population growth by the king and queen of neo-Malthusianism, Paul and Anne Ehrlich.”

 

Alan: They’ve been at this their whole life, getting massive funding for hammering at the population growth and so on.

“On the official website of the Prince of Wales, prince Charles commended the Ehrlich’s latest population study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society on January 8 of this year, calling among other things for globally provided ‘back-up abortions’ to avert overpopulation catastrophe. The prince writes: ‘We do, in fact, have all the tools, assets and knowledge to avoid the collapse of which this report warns, but only if we act decisively now.’”

 

Alan: Well, their last one, the big population bomb, it was all BS. But it doesn’t matter how much BS they churn out, they always bring out the same characters, because they’re awfully good at hyping up the fear and so on. And actually, if they do abortion on an IQ level, I think Prince Charles might be changing his mind there, because I don’t think he’d be around. Anyway, it says,

“In their latest study entitled Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?, biologists Paul R. Ehrlich and his wife repeat their decade-long mantra, namely that global population growth is certain to collapse civilization as a whole- and only a concerted global effort to reduce fertility...”

 

Alan: Now, you better understand, they’ve been doing that; that’s why folk are going sterile.

“...only a concerted global effort to reduce fertility may avert the feared catastrophe. The report mentions that global population reduction is a monumental task, but they add: ‘Monumental, but not impossible if the political will could be generated globally to give full rights, education and opportunities to women...’”

 

Alan: They’re always using that angle.

“‘...and provide all sexually active human beings with modern contraception and backup abortion. The degree to which those steps would reduce fertility rates is controversial, but they are a likely win-win for societies.’”

 

Alan: It says,

“These words contain some drastic and draconian implications. In order to provide ‘back-up abortions’ to women on a global scale, a worldwide population reduction strategy must be outlined and then enforced by all nations of the planet. The Ehrlichs concede that such a worldwide effort would not go down well with nations opposing abortions: ‘Obviously (…) there are huge cultural and institutional barriers to establishing such policies in some parts of the world. After all, there is not a single nation where women are truly treated as equal to men...’”

 

Alan: They always use this nonsense. Remember, these guys were communists and still are, and actually communism’s a front for something much bigger, for those who haven’t clued into it.

“ ‘… Despite that, the population driver should not be ignored simply because limiting overconsumption can, at least in theory, be achieved more rapidly. The difficulties of changing demographic trajectories mean that the problem should have been addressed sooner, rather than later.’ … Responding to countless recent studies showing that not overpopulation, but underpopulation seems to be an increasing problem, especially in Europe, the Ehrlichs state: ‘That halting population growth inevitably leads to changes in age structure is no excuse for bemoaning drops in fertility rates, as is common in European government circles. Reduction of population size in those over-consuming nations is a very positive trend,...’”

 

Alan: So, in other words, the native populations going down, and having no children, is a positive trend. And bringing in all the immigration, I guess, is a positive trend, as well.

“‘... and sensible planning can deal with the problems of population aging.’”

 

Alan: Sensible planning” can deal with the population aging, eh?

“They also write that besides change in the politics of demography, the educational system should also join the effort in a ‘symmetrical’ manner, ‘moving towards sustainability and enhancing equity (including redistribution).’”

 

Alan: This is of wealth, again, you know.

“The scientific community must throw its weight behind the effort, the Ehrlichs say, especially to counter all religious counter-argumentation underlining the value of life...”

 

Alan: So, in other words, they’re doing the same thing that Julian Huxley talked about at UNICEF and he talked about that many, many years ago; I’ve read his articles on the air here. It’s the same group actually, ongoing and it’s perpetual, well funded by the big foundations that are the fronts to distribute the money from the big international money-lenders. And it says here

“‘Global population reduction and global redistribution of wealth. These things can of course only be accomplished through a concerted global effort or, as the authors declare ‘an unprecedented level of international cooperation.’:...”

 

Alan: It’s right along the Marxian plank, which is the redistribution of wealth, remember. They’ve never changed their mantras.

“‘At the global level, the loose network of agreements that now tie countries together, developed in a relatively recent stage of cultural evolution since modern nation states appeared, is utterly inadequate to grapple with the human predicament...’”

 

Alan: So, they want to strengthen global environmental governance. I told you that’s to manage us all (this environmental stuff) and you’ve got global government already here, folks, if you don’t know it. Back with more, after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about the big system and the agenda, of course. There’s many parts of the agenda and everyone gets massive publicity through the media, because they own the media, you understand. It’s only when you understand why it’s all there, in the media, that you understand what they’re trying to get through to you, to change your opinions on things. Most folk don’t know what’s been happening. They look up to Attenborough as some kind of god. They’ve grown up watching him on television and they’ll believe that everything he tells them is true. And it’s so easy to see things, as I say, on television, like Calcutta’s busy city and you’ll say, oh my god, overpopulation’s just terrible. But they don’t show you a good part of India, where there’s just hardly any people, if anybody at all. But it’s all tricks of the camera, isn’t it, and perception? And, you understand, the whole world and all the financial ministers are on board with this big plan. The whole world’s on a governmental system. And sometimes they’ll use other countries to voice something, which will get you familiar with the idea and then when your own guys say it, in your own countries, you’ll say, oh well, I guess so, I guess it had to be that way. And this is from Japan. It says,

 

“Let elderly people ‘hurry up and die’, says Japanese minister” 

“Taro Aso says he would refuse end-of-life care and would ‘feel bad’ knowing treatment was paid for by government”

 

Alan: He says. So he says, Let elderly people ‘hurry up and die’. Taro Aso, he’s a top politician in the government there.

“Taro Aso referred to elderly patients who are no longer able to feed themselves as ‘tube people’.”

 

Alan: And,

“Japan’s new government is barely a month old, and already one of its most senior members has insulted tens of millions of voters by suggesting that the elderly are an unnecessary drain on the country’s finances.”

 

Alan: It’s almost like Obama talking about his granny, at one time, his first term when he got in. He was hinting along that line too: wouldn’t it be easier to let them die (sort of thing) than to spend lots of money on them. Now we can spend lots of money on wars; we can spend lots of money on taking whole factories, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them, out of countries and setting them up in China. That’s OK. The taxpayer pays for that. We can spend billions, if not trillions, paying off bankers that collapse the economies through con-games and frauds but we can’t look after ourselves. Anyway, it says,

“Taro Aso, the finance minister,”

Alan: Naturally he’s the finance minister.

 “...said on Monday that the elderly should be allowed to ‘hurry up and die’ to relieve pressure on the state to pay for their medical care.”

“‘Heaven forbid if you are forced to live on when you want to die. I would wake up feeling increasingly bad knowing that [treatment] was all being paid for by the government,’ he said during a meeting of the national council on social security reforms. ‘The problem won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.’ Aso’s comments are likely to cause offence in Japan, where almost a quarter of the 128 million population is aged over 60. The proportion is forecast to rise to 40% over the next 50 years. The remarks are also an unwelcome distraction for the new prime minister, Shinzo Abe,”

 

Alan: Strange name, Abe.

“...whose first period as Japan’s leader ended with his resignation after just a year, in 2007, partly due to a string of gaffes by members of his cabinet. Rising welfare costs, particularly for the elderly, were behind a decision last year to double consumption [sales] tax to 10% over the next three years, a move Aso’s Liberal Democratic party supported.”

 

Alan: They’re very liberal, eh? You better understand what “liberal” means, folks.

“The 72-year-old, who doubles as deputy prime minister, said he would refuse end-of-life care. ‘I don’t need that kind of care,’ he said in comments quoted by local media, adding that he had written a note instructing his family to deny him life-prolonging medical treatment. To compound the insult, he referred to elderly patients who are no longer able to feed themselves as ‘tube people.’ The health and welfare ministry, he added, was ‘well aware that it costs several tens of millions of yen’ a month to treat a single patient in the final stages of life. Cost aside, caring for the elderly is a major challenge for Japan’s stretched social services. According to a report this week, the number of households receiving welfare, which include family members aged 65 or over, stood at more than 678,000, or about 40% of the total. The country is also tackling a rise in the number of people who die alone, most of whom are elderly. In 2010, 4.6 million elderly people lived alone, and the number who died at home soared 61% between 2003 and 2010, from 1,364 to 2,194, according to the bureau of social welfare and public health in Tokyo. The government is planning to reduce welfare expenditure in its next budget, due to go into force this April, with details of the cuts expected within days. Aso, who has a propensity for verbal blunders, later attempted to clarify his comments. He acknowledged his language had been ‘inappropriate’ in a public forum and insisted he was talking only about his personal preference.”

 

Alan: And it says,

“It is not the first time Aso, one of Japan’s wealthiest politicians, has questioned the state’s duty towards its large elderly population. In 2008, while serving as prime minister, he described ‘doddering’ pensioners as tax burdens who should take better care of their health. ‘I see people aged 67 or 68 at class reunions who dodder around and are constantly going to the doctor,’ he said at a meeting of economists. ‘Why should I have to pay for people who just eat and drink and make no effort? I walk every day and do other things, but I’m paying more in taxes.’ He had already angered the country’s doctors by telling them they lacked common sense, made a joke about Alzheimer’s patients, and pronounced “penniless young men” unfit for marriage.”

 

Alan: This is an odd statement, too, he made:

“In 2001, he said he wanted Japan to become the kind of successful country in which ‘the richest Jews would want to live.’”

 

Alan: Isn’t that a bit odd? Eh?  And,

“He once likened an opposition party to the Nazis, praised Japan’s colonial rule in Taiwan and, as foreign minister, told US diplomats they would never be trusted in Middle East peace negotiations because they have ‘blue eyes and blond hair.’”

 

Alan: I wonder what he really perhaps is, behind that. I wonder what he really is behind all that. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt, talking about the big system and all of the symptoms of the disease. You can never talk about the disease but you can talk about the symptoms, the big fallout and it’s all fallout, you understand. And it’s all run by fear, as well. And lots of money goes into these television programs (like Attenborough’s) to terrify you. And lots and lots of cash comes from foundations, as well; the “parallel government,” it’s called, officially, the “parallel government.” It’s run by foundations that all work together and they fund hundreds and hundreds, thousands actually, of non-governmental organizations, across the world, because there’s a big plan underway, you understand. And, it’s amazing as I say, because over the last year and more, over the years I’ve read the statistics from the UN, to do with the populations of Ireland and Scotland and England and so on, and different parts of Europe, as it plummets, and most of the births now, in some of them, in fact, are coming from straight immigration. So, it’s quite interesting that, you see, you can’t please the masters, because then they just flood you with immigration, which also destroys the culture; not to help the immigrants, mind you, because they lose their cultures, as well, eventually, down the road and you end up being masters to this big brother government. That’s the whole idea behind it all. And to eradicate the main enemy of this plan for years and years, is to eradicate the native populations of Europe. And it says here, in this article here, too... I’ll put it up tonight, as well... all of these articles, I’ll put up the links to, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com... This one is to do with, it says,

“On the 19th of January, 2013, the biggest ever Irish pro-life rally took place in Merrion Square, Dublin - over 30,000 people tell Enda Kenny and Fine Gael to keep his pro-life promise.”

 

Alan: And I’ll put that up tonight, to show you that they know; they want to keep their people alive, their livestock alive, you might say, their history, their people. Because you are the end product of thousands and thousands that’ve gone before you, generations of people. Why should you just toss it out the window because you’re told to?

And this article, also, is to do with... it’s interesting, very interesting, because Peter Hitchens was the brother of Christopher Hitchens and Christopher Hitchens really was communist and he worked with The Nation newspaper, too, and a secular humanist, etc. His brother, who was also involved in newspapers (a journalist and so on) in some of the Cold War countries, during the Cold War. And he mentioned in previous articles that, after the fall—or the merging, I’d call it, of communism with the West, as it was designed to do – he said that the amount of unpleasantness, in the countries, with the way the people treated each other, because they were completely, really, turned into utterly atheistic people, living for themselves, and the amount of robberies and so on was just skyrocketing, because the love for their fellow man was just gone. And everything runs, even still today, on bribery, in these countries. But here he is, on what’s happened to Britain, as well, because he knows; he knows there’s been a war (a specific war), by a certain people who had to destroy, first, the church, because the church, also, was always pro-life, you see (whatever Christian church it was). And it says,

“Human Rights are the State religion of Europe...”

 

Alan: It says,

“...the unpleasant new country in which we are now trapped.”

 

Alan: The “unpleasant new country”... you know, they’re doing away with the nations and calling them just Europe. He says,

“These supposed rights have expelled and replaced Christianity. They have shrunk the human conscience and vastly increased the power of the State. That is why it was no use  anyone going to the Strasbourg Court to win back Christianity’s lost status as the dominant faith of Britain. The Church has been humiliated. Britain no longer exists.”

 

Alan: What a statement to make. “Britain no longer exists.” Now, I also put up that link last night, with a woman who blurted out on the BBC that it’s like living in a foreign country, because they’re all feeling the pinch. And they’re all paying for it too. It says,

“True, you can now wear a cross while working for British Airways. But you have that freedom because you are now just another protected minority, which has no more rights or standing than other faiths, such as Atheism, Islam, Buddhism, Sikhism or Hinduism. In fact, the Christian religion is worse off than all the others because it has to be constantly reminded that it is not the national religion any more. This means regular slaps and humiliations of the kind handed out by occupying powers...”

 

Alan: Nice term: “occupying powers.”

“...to troublesome peoples not yet used to being subjugated. The most devastating of these was delivered two years ago by Lord Justice Laws, who personally humbled Lord Carey, a former Archbishop of Canterbury, before jeering at religious opinions as ‘irrational’. He intoned: ‘The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other.’ I don’t like this judgment, but it is a deadly accurate statement of the position. This country’s official faith, as people are slowly discovering, is a code of ideas called ‘Equality and Diversity’, based on several European Directives but put into law in Britain mainly through the Equality Act 2010. The continued existence of a few rather wet bishops in the House of Lords, and various other baubles and trinkets in odd corners of the constitution, means nothing against the Equality and Diversity bulldozer, enacted by Harriet Harman with the willing help of her Tory counterpart, Theresa May. Its demands are written into the contracts of public employees, and supported by the politically correct public-sector unions. Private firms that do business with the State are roped in. So are (as we have learned in recent years) the owners of small hotels and cafes, adoption agencies, housing associations and councils that have prayers before they meet. It controls thought and speech in a new post-modern way.”

 

Alan: See it’s all thought control and speech control.

“Today’s liberal bigots don’t crudely threaten to throw people in prison for saying things they disapprove of.”

 

Alan: Or they do. It says,

“That might result in protests even from the increasingly spineless people of this country. Instead, they menace our livelihoods. Speak out and you lose your job, with little hope of ever getting another.”

 

Alan: It’s totally Big Brother and totalitarian.

“This is, of course, tyrannical and brutal. But because it is not the Gestapo, the Stasi or the Gulag, we don’t recognise it for what it is. And because it is done in the name of ‘Rights’ – which sound reassuring and friendly – we do not realise that it is, in fact, a deep and shameful wrong. And so it grows worse each day.”

 

Alan: So he goes on and on and it’s quite worth reading this article, as I say; I’ll put it up tonight and you can read it for yourself. But it’s true: Britain is gone. Lots of countries are gone. There’s still more to go. And there’s big pushes by big powerful forces to do in what’s left, you understand, so as you can be ruled “properly” by those at the top (who actually have a certain kind of religion, you might say).

Now, again too, we’re in perpetual war. I’ve read the article, before, from the US Military and it was actually called “Perpetual War” and it was also total conflict and so on. But that’s what we’re in now. It’s a big, big agenda: for your whole lifetime to come, you’re going to live from one war to the next. And they’re hyping it up. It’s like East Asia/West Asia, as Winston says, who are we fighting today?, as they keep changing their sights, in 1984 the book. Anyway, it says,

“UK in ‘generational struggle’ against terror, says PM”

 

Alan: Says the Prime Minister of Britain. And it says,

“He told MPs the UK needed an ‘iron resolve’ to tackle the threat and put terrorism at the top of the G8’s agenda under the UK’s presidency. The prime minister said the threat of terrorism from Afghanistan and Pakistan had reduced, but North Africa was becoming a ‘magnet for jihadists.’”

 

Alan: Now, any excuse will do. And you wouldn’t believe the wealth in the ground (the mineral wealth in the ground) of North Africa; they do, they know and understand at the top. And never mind even the Congo, for God’s sake, why they’ve been warring for years there. It’s one of the biggest reserves of uranium and the West wants it all, for peanuts. Anyway, there’s gold, there’s all kinds of things there, very rich. And to tie in with this article too, I’ll put a link up tonight, to do with:

“Fragile States and Ungoverned Spaces”

 

Alan: This was a CIA thing, put out quite a few years back. When Bush Jr. was in, in fact, the boys that ran him (he was the front puppet-man), talked about it too: the plan for revolutionary democracy, they’d call it, at that time, when they went into countries and forced democracy on the people by invading them. First you bomb them, then you shoot them apart and destroy their infrastructure, then you try and teach them democracy, supposedly. But, again, now they’re calling it “Fragile States and Ungoverned Spaces.” It’s a PDF, I’ll put up tonight too, and an article about it, as well, because Obama is pushing on the same kind of thing. But it ties in with this article here and it says the threat of terrorism is bad, etc, and,

“Concerns about the growing influence of al-Qaeda...”

 

Alan: This al-Qaeda is just like Goldstein in 1984; it’s everywhere, right?

“... in North Africa have been heightened following the deployment of French troops to tackle militant groups linked to the network in Mali and the hostage crisis at an Algerian gas plant, in which at least 48 foreign hostages died after a four-day siege.”

 

Alan: Remember too, I’ll put another link to the fact that there’s even Canadians apparently that were some of these militants over there. I wonder if we’re training them here. See, you don’t know who works for the secret services and who doesn’t, anymore, you know. So,

“Mr Cameron told MPs that the ‘murderous violence’ seen in Algeria required a strong security response and the UK would work ‘right across the region,’ including in Nigeria, Libya and Mali, to tackle the threat.”

 

Alan: So, they want to do all these countries in, especially all the Muslim countries (they’ll have to be destroyed). And we’ll hear one side of the story, which is: oh, they’re all al-Qaeda... they’re all al-Qaeda, radical Muslims and so on, etc etc.  Even though the West created what was al-Qaeda, which was a loose network at the time. And now, we’ve got years of children going to grow up, losing their mums and dads, that are never going to forget this and yeah, you will have terror forever. They knew this before they started. When there’s no terror there, you’ve got to create it; that’s what you do. And so he says,

“The North African terrorist threat could last decades”

 

Alan: He says. And,

“Three Britons are confirmed dead and three more are believed to have died after the Algerian army stormed the site at In Amenas on Saturday. Another UK resident is also thought to be dead. One victim has been named as 46-year-old Paul Thomas Morgan. The UK prime minister said the incident was a ‘stark reminder’ of the terrorist threat in that part of the world and added: ‘This is a global threat and it will require a global response.’”

 

Alan: And you know too, the big corporations, remember, it even came out after Blair, I read it on the air here, from mainstream newspapers, when they said that all the big oil companies went to him many months before they were going to invade Iraq, and they all put in their bids for different oil fields. This is how they do it, at the top. Well, they can do the same with all these countries I’ve just mentioned here. Also, of course, everybody’s going on about the Texas shooting. Apparently, it was some spiff between two fellas at the college campus in Houston, at,

“Lone Star College’s North Harris Campus...”

 

Alan: And it says,

“Three people have been shot at a college...”

 

Alan: And so on. And it says too that one person died with a heart attack. I don’t know if it was an elderly person going by or what. And,

“One person was arrested while a possible second gunman is being hunted by police.”

 

Alan: And we don’t know what the spat was about. We don’t know what was going on, but they haven’t said much more since then, but it seemed to be a duel between two different fellas that had something going, maybe gang leaders; we just don’t know.

And at Davos in Switzerland, where the big boys decide our fate, supposedly, because remember, the Bank for International Settlements is there too and that’s to be the kingpin for the world government. And it says,

“Business leaders ‘see no growth’”

 

Alan: There.

“More than half of chief executives (CEOs) in a new survey have predicted the global economy will continue on its current path of minimal growth in 2013.”

 

Alan: Then they go and give you percentages and all the rest of it and predictions. It says,

“It is still an improvement from last year when 48% predicted a decline. The research came from interviews conducted with 1,330 chief executives in 68 countries. It was released at the start of the World Economic Forum in the Swiss ski resort of Davos.”

 

Alan:  The WEF, which is the “few” backwards... it’s for the few. And this article too, is to do with... it says here... The Daily Caller, it says

“Child Pornography...”

 

Alan: And it says,

“The finding against the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) was made by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG).”

“Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder Thursday requesting an explanation as to why the Justice Department declined to file charges against a federal prosecutor with child pornography found on his work computer.” 

“... According to the Inspector General’s report, the AUSA admitted to spending a significant amount of time each day viewing porn at work.”

 

Alan: I guess they’ve got nothing much else to do there, eh?

“‘The OIG conducted an investigation concerning allegations that an AUSA was using his government computer to view inappropriate material on his government computer,’ the Grassley letter quoted from the OIG report. ‘The investigation determined that the AUSA routinely viewed adult content during official duty hours, and that there was at least one image of child pornography recovered on the AUSA’s government computer.”

 

Alan: So, they’re looking into it and so on, but this stuff is going to disappear because in Britain they’re already saying, ‘what is inappropriate and what isn’t inappropriate?’, because they’re getting some bigwigs off with it right now. And so there’ll be no legal implications, eventually (very shortly, in fact) for having whatever on your computer (any kind of child pornography). That’s where they’re going with it all. And I’ve read the articles here, again.

And, this article too... it’s good to be a climate alarmist because they pay you an awful lot of money.

“Climate Alarmist Michael Mann Charges $10,000 Speaker Fee”

 

Alan: Not bad, eh? It says,

“Prominent global warming alarmist Michael Mann, who often asserts that scientists who are skeptical of his alarmist global warming theories are motivated by making money, charges $10,000 plus expenses for speaking fees, Media Trackers Florida has learned. The revelation about Mann’s exorbitant speaking fees comes as Mann prepares to give a global warming presentation at a taxpayer-funded Florida public college. Mann will be speaking at Valencia College Thursday, January 17, at 1:00 pm.”

 

Alan: He’s got an agent, just like they all do these days – they’ve got their own agents, just like, you know, entertainers.

“Mann’s agent, Jodi Solomon, said in a phone call earlier this month that Mann would charge $10,000 plus travel expenses to address a meeting of Florida air conditioning specialists. Ironically, Mann publicly accuses scientists of making money off their skepticism of Mann’s alarmist global warming claims. For example, in a 2012 interview with Popular Science, Mann accuses scientist Steve Milloy of being a ‘valueless, all-purpose denier for notorious industries who need a hired gun.’ Mann presented no evidence of whether or how much money ‘notorious industries’ allegedly give Milloy. Mann’s speaking fees, however, call into question his motives for championing global warming alarmism.”

 

Alan: Well, it’s not hard to find out what his motives are, right?

“According to the American Spectator, Michael Mann research projects received nearly $6 million in grant money through the end of 2009.”

 

Alan: Not bad, eh?

“ Public records show Mann research projects additionally received nearly $1 million since 2010. Mann collects speaking fees in addition to his grant money. Mann is a very busy public speaker who may well be making hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual speaking fees.”

 

Alan: So, it’s the old, old story, you know: what’s good for them, is good for them. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And we’ll go to Joe, from San Francisco, if he’s still there. Are you there, Joe?

Joe: Yeah, I am, Alan.  I just wanted to thank you again for keeping doing what you’re doing. I wanted to ask you... you’ve mentioned the spraying that goes on and the fact that you keep mentioning the year 1998, as the year when they really kicked it into gear.  Can you tell me what was it about that year, or is there any kind of knowledge you have about that specific year, where they really kicked it into gear? Because that was the year that I felt things starting to get really kind of weird.

Alan: It was very evident for those that looked up at all, in 1998. And I walked out of the house one day and literally, it was like science fiction. They weren’t so high, those aircraft, as they are now. And they were leaving massive trails. They had already crisscrossed the sky, literally, like a chessboard and I thought, what is this? has a war started or what? And the only thing I could find out was that the countries involved, that were getting sprayed, suddenly, all together, had signed the Open Skies Treaty. And I looked into the Open Skies Treaty and it was very vague about airspace and so on, letting foreign planes come in and different things like that. And I couldn’t find any other connection but obviously it had been planned a long, long, many years before. Obviously, it had to be planned that way, for them all to start at the same time (in Canada and the States and Britain and elsewhere). It had to be an international treaty of some sort. Remember, there are treaties that the public are not allowed to get a hold of, because we wouldn’t like them, obviously, so they’re kept secret. But everybody was in on it. And as soon as they started spraying, I mean, people were getting very sick: sore throats, bronchitis that wouldn’t clear up; some people get cramps in their legs and so on – even animals have been found to get that too. So, these heavy metals are damaging us.

Joe: That’s about the time I noticed things just got weird. I didn’t really notice the trails in the sky.  And then I started getting really bad sinus infections.

Alan: That’s right. Yeah.

Joe: That just wouldn’t go away. At one point, I got really, really sick. I just thought that was really odd that you keep mentioning that year, the year that I just saw things as getting kind of strange in the media and elsewhere.  Anyway, thanks for answering my question.

Alan: Thanks for calling. Yeah, there’s no doubt about it. They did start spraying heavily then. People were getting bronchitis, couldn’t clear it up (antibiotics after antibiotics). And there’s obviously statistics that they know about at the top (in Canada and the States) of who’s dying with it (the elderly or whatever, folk with bronchial problems). And if you ask... even then the pharmacies were exploding with their sales of bronchodilators for bronchial problems and cold formulas, just exploding. And it’s still going on; winter and summer; it doesn’t matter now. They’re just downing the pills and the pharmacists also know that antibiotics have skyrocketed in consumption for bronchitic problems now. This is a time when few people smoke. And they can’t blame factories because there’s hardly any left. But this is the agenda, folks, and you understand, we are living at the bottom level of reality, even with all these articles I’m reading here; these are all the symptoms of the fallout in society, but you don’t get into the big agenda at the top, because, obviously, you would not like it at all.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

By the way, it’s thirty below Fahrenheit, right now. Freezing here. That’s about minus thirty-five centigrade or so. So much for global warming. Bye now.

{Closing Music ♫}

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

"Mankind is a Plague on the Earth"---David Attenborough

The Scientists who "Greened" the BBC

Humanity Reaching Plague Proportions

Elderly are an Unnecessary Drain on the Country's Economy---Japanese Financial Politician

Biggest Irish Pro-Life Rally Ever

Britain No Longer Exists

The Truth on Immigration

Who Are we Fighting Today, Eastasia or Westasia, Mr. Cameron?

Fragile States and Ungoverned Spaces

North Africa---Are Westerners Pulling the Strings

Cameron---North African War Could Last Decades

School Shooting in Houston, Texas

& More on Above

Davos---Business Leaders see No Growth

Child Porn Found on Assistant US Attorney's Computer

Climate Alarmist Charges $10,000 Speaker Fee